
(Photo by Sasha Blaes/Clinton Foundation. Left to right, John in DC from Americablog; young fellow from Clinton Foundation that I did not meet personally (sorry!); Jay Carson, Clinton Foundation press secretary; former President Bill Clinton; and Peter Daou.)
It turns out that Bill Clinton got started reading blogs by his daughter, who told him that he really needed to check out the independent reporting and analysis that was being done on the web. And he did...and, according to Peter Daou, who did much of the coordination for the meeting, President Clinton really loves reading blogs. Who knew?!?
So, the call came in last week with the invitation to go up to New York and meet with the Big Dawg -- but we were asked to keep the meeting off the record, it was just going to be a meet and greet, no more than an hour...your basic, "Hello, you know I'm out there, I know you're out there, perhaps we can do something together in the future." sort of thing.
Jane and I decided to go -- as if a meeting with a former President is something you just blow off (that would be rude!) -- and we wanted to emphasize the need for better messaging and coordination/cooperation with blogs and the Democratic leadership, who seem to constantly be trying to work at cross-purposes with all of us. (Hello?!? We're here to help, and we aren't charging you a dime for it -- and we actually care if you win, unlike some of the consultant rat holes you keep pouring your money into every election cycle. Wake up!)
(Photo by Sasha Blaes/Clinton Foundation. From left to right: Bill Scher, Liberal Oasis; Duncan Black, Atrios of Eschaton; Dave Johnson of Seeing the Forest; and Chris Bowers of MyDD. Quite the brainy row, isn't it?)
As you might imagine in a meeting with a former President and a policy wonk like Bill Clinton, we did a lot of listening to start things off. Interrupting a former President takes a little getting used to, for me at least -- momma beat those manners into me a little more than usual, maybe. But after the first moments of shock when he walked into the room and that part of your brain that tracks celebrity gossip started going off "OMG! That really IS Bill Clinton!"...and he looks just the same in person as you see on teevee...we got down to business and started talking shop.
Which, for all of the folks in the room, turned out to be one huge wonk festival, as you might imagine.
With lots of disagreement and talking over each other, including, on occasion, talking over Bill Clinton. Because the weird thing was, after we started digging into our lunches and talking shop, that whole "former President" veneer sort of slid away for all of us, but the issues about which we all care, and debate, and haggle, and argue, and the rest -- those were there for all of us, and that's what we dug into for more than two hours.
Jeralyn has covered a number of the topics we discussed, and I'm sure several of you have read through her post, so I don't want to re-invent the wheel here. But there were a couple of topics that I wanted to hit that Jane and I emphasized -- emphatically at times -- because this was an opportunity to get a message beyond Bill Clinton to the entrenched party apparatus and we were not going to miss out on a messaging moment because Miss Manners might prefer a more demure luncheon attitude. (Screw that!)

(Photo by Sasha Blaes/Clinton Foundation. From left to right: Jeralyn's son's head; a little of McJoan from DailyKos; Jane Hamsher of FDL; and Matt Stoller of MyDD.)
As you can see in the above photo, Jane wasn't shy about speaking her mind. (As if...) And she spent some time during the meeting emphasizing the lack of coordinated message and how much more effective the party could be if they would work with -- instead of against -- us. The ABC/Disney movie work was a great example of the synergy that can be created when the blogs and the party and various individual interests all get on the same page and push something important to all of us.
Imagine where that could take us for the elections in November.
And while President Clinton has faith in the abilities of Rahm Emmanuel and Chuck Schumer, I made clear to Jay Carson, his press secretary, that both Schumer and Emmanuel have been dismissive and rude to bloggers when we have offered assitance, or critique, or information -- and that this attitude needed adjustment for the greater good of the entire party. That what we all want is a Democratic win, and that we were willing to work with them toward that -- but they had to be willing to listen to criticism when we were getting an overwhelming message from our readers that they are doing something wrong. (Didn't get a chance to say that to President Clinton, but Jay was attentive and interested in the examples that I gave him of specific instances with both men, and promised to see what they could do to...um...rectify the situation.)
I thought both Jane and Matt Stoller made excellent points with regard to messaging failures in the Democratic party and the need for better talking heads to represent us all on the news shows. And the need for much better preparation for those shows. We have offered, in the past, to put together prep information -- specifically on the CIA leak case, because Jane and I have been so steeped in the minutiae and the facts and bigger picture implications -- but no one has ever taken me up on the offers (can't speak for Jane on that).
I mean, honestly, how hard is it to task someone on your staff to Google for a couple of hours to put together some summary papers on issues you know will be hit on a Sunday show? Or to e-mail a blogger who specializes in a particular issue and ask for help? In case anyone is wondering: we would be more than happy to be helpful -- and we'd actually be discreet and prompt, because it's just the sort of people we are.

(Photo by Sasha Blaes/Clinton Foundation. Left to right, Jeralyn's son -- isn't he a cutie? -- and me, talking with my hands, as usual.)
We got to talk a bit about poverty, race, and class issues -- specifically regarding some of the criminal enforcement issues that have risen to the surface via mandatory minimum sentences and the bass-ackwards way that we approach crime in this country. This is a pet issue of mine, and is one of the reasons I stopped practicing law because I couldn't stand being a short-term band-aid any longer to problems which need serious, long-term political solutions -- and I wanted to be able to work toward that somehow. Jeralyn and I have both seen the effects first-hand of a criminal system designed to give political points to elected officials who get to act "tough on crime," while really only making things worse in a whole lot of ways. I hope we can have more conversations about this issue in the Democratic party in the months to come, because it is a huge problem.
The transcript of the on-the-record portion of the meeting isn't yet available, but when we get it, I'll update if there is something that I've missed here.
All in all, I thought it was a good first meeting. President Clinton was clearly in meet and greet mode, but so were we, so it worked out well. Where things go from here, if anywhere, is anyone's guess -- but this is an excellent opportunity for blogs and politicians to become much more comfortable with each other in the Democratic party. The GOP has been using this communications medium to its advantage for quite a while, and it is high time we levelled the playing field -- but bloggers cannot do that by themselves, the elected officials have to start playing ball. And I hope that Clinton's example of a reach-out will move that along.
Now for the dish: during my travel to NYC, a bottle of saline solution opened up in my luggage and drenched everything around it, including my straightening iron for my hair. I woke up the morning of the meeting, turned on my iron and hopped in the shower, only to start smelling this burning plastic smell. Eeep! Thankfully, I had put another dryer in the bag as well as a just in case, but I had to go to the meeting with less than smooth hair. Oh well.
Rode over to the meeting with McJoan, who I absolutely adore. President Clinton was running late from a prior meeting, so all the bloggers headed down the street to a Starbucks to hang out until he arrived.
Lunch was fantastic. A local caterer brought in some great food: Southern-style baked chicken (no fried food for Clinton since the heart issue), spinach with a little ham hock, baked sweet potato fries, yummy cornbread, salad and fruit. And for dessert, we had red velvet cake with cream cheese frosting.
Bill Cinton was wearing a very well tailored suit, and a blue shirt with very tiny white pinstripes -- the blue was the exact color of his eyes. (Someone has a good eye that is doing his tailoring.) He wore a deeper blue tie, and looked like he was enjoying himself as he talked to everyone around the table.
All in all, I think the bloggers enjoyed themselves. It was an interesting meeting, and one that I'm sure we'll all be dissecting in some way for a while -- there are a number of ways this can move forward (or not), and the question is which of them will he, and we, choose. We live in interesting times...
(Huge thank you to Twisted Martini, who helped me with my picture downloads late last night. Couldn't have done this post without your help!)
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
FITZ!
FDL!!
Good morning!
OT -
I cannot confirm, but a diary over at Kos reports that the latest Rasmussen is in for CT - and it is good news for Lamont after those other (questionable) polls showing him behind by double digits. I have cut and pasted the diary below:
Rasmussen has just come out with a new poll behind the subscription wall, but since these polls are put out there
i figure it`s ok to give the results.
Rasmussen has this race a dead heat
LIEBERMAN 45
LAMONT 43
Now all other polls show Lieberman with a double digit lead
so it`s a question who to believe. I think Rasmussen has a pretty good record with state polls.
also of interest TESTER 52
BURNS 43
http://www.dailykos.com/storyo.....8291/46398
I’m so proud!
Bling and FDL
Reddhead!
Big Dog!
(gotta go, late for work!)
Good morning, and Go Blue!
What a completely uplifting experience this must have been.
So, did the aura of Bubba make you feel warm all over? I feel his infectiousness over the airwaves just upon hearing his voice!
You are one lucky gal!
OT– Novakula on cspan.
Oh, Twisted — I forgot to thank you in the post for the help with the pictures! I’m so sorry! You were essential to my being able to post this at all!
Quick OT: CNN interviewing Mitch McConnell just now about the detainee interrogation program. Funny how all the nice Republicans call everybody patriots when the disagreement goes public in their own ranks…
Bush is holding a press avail this morning at 11:15. So here’s what I want to know. How can you with specificity say the detainee interrogation program and the torture tactics you want the Congress to sanction have stopped another terrorist attack.
I haven’t had any elephants in my backyard in the last five years…is it because my cocker spaniels are such effective elephant chasers?
Or maybe they’ve picked other backyards?
Like, Spain. Or Great Britain. How can you, Bush, justify conflating the torture tactics you want to use with the fact that we haven’t been attacked in the last five years. What attacks have you specifically halted? If you can’t tell us, which Senators can confirm your bluster? The Bushaholics? Or credible speakers?
Trust us? Not again, Bush, not ever again.
After reading Clinton’s biography, I’m not at all surprised that he reads blogs - it fits in with the information sponge personality that comes through the book. So, on the off chance that he’s reading here . . .
Hi, Bill! Glad you made the effort to pull this gathering together. You - and the Democratic party - won’t be sorry.
Christy,
I know there’s stuff that’s off the record, but did you get the impression that Big Dog might be interested in a more formalized relationship between the bloggers and the centralized DC establishment?
Complete trivia. I’m glad you weren’t at a Lieberman luncheon and served spinach.
Seriously, thank you for all you do.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 10
Just doing my job m’am.
It was my pleasure, contributing a little bit to roll the rock another few yards up the mountain.
Will help in this effort where I can. Not so good on research, but can throw in on messaging.
Gotta pack, headed for Las Vegas this afternoon.
A little OT but….
Thank you tommy yum, I can’t stop humming the tune
If anyone can get through to Bob Novak on Washington Journal this morning on C-SPAN via phone or email (I think he’s on for about another half hour):
“Have you testified in the Plame investigation since the beginning of this year?”
would be an excellent question to ask…
P.S. Sorry to change the upbeat subject of this thread - and dig the photos!
tommy yum at 13 — You know, I’m not certain what the answer is to that question, honestly. It’s tough to tell at this stage whether it’s a co-opting the blogs for their purposes or a synergistic partnership or what. And, honestly, he can’t speak for everyone in the party, so what he and his supporters want isn’t necessarily what someone else wants. It’s a very dynamic situation — and it presupposes that we’ll just go along with what they want, which is NOT a given. I’m just sort of taking a wait-and-see approach on this. It could prove very helpful for the Democratic party for all of us to work together on issues where we can find common ground — we saw that clearly with the recent fight with ABC/Disney where they weren’t expecting any fight from the left and ended up having to edit the movie at the last minute and back down on their claims of anything beyond biased truthiness. It was serendipitous that the meeting occurred so close on the heels of all of that — having been scheduled well before that fight got going — and I think Clinton was appreciative of us having his back, without having had to have been asked to do so. So we started the meeting on more of a peer footing than we otherwise would have, I think, which is a good thing for the bloggers.
Wow Christy, what a day! I am so heartened by this–it does make one feel like “someone” cares, that they are willing to listen.
If any of you folks from the Clinton Foundation (or Chelsea or “someone”) are reading this, to follow up on the points Christy made about the lame-assed Dem talking heads (I mean Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi — like embarrassing performance by Reid on the PBS Jim Lehrer Newshour the other night) that get sent out on our behalf (because Christy is right on, we do desperately want Dem victories); stop dumbing shit down!!!! Find some people (actually Big Dawg is great on this score) who know how to speak intelligently to the issues that we all care about, who can do it in normal conversational english, and who can do it with passion.
We, the people . . . are. Not. Stupid. If we wanted to be treated like children, we would’ve become republicans along time ago.
Please ditch the Joe Klein patronizing attitude. And the robotic Pelosi ‘talking points’ style. And find spokespeople who can think and speak on their feet, who are willing to take the time to become well informed on issues that really matter.
And who have the courage and the confidence to speak with passion and conviction. Like Ann Richards (God bless her soul), Mario Cuomo and even Al Gore when he has freed himself of his handler’s shackles.
If you all haven’t seen it yet, Molly Ivins has written a wonderful tribute column to Ann Richards. You can find it at:
http://www.creators.com/opinio.....nsName=miv
pow wow at 18 — aren’t the photos awesome? Clinton’s photographer was fantastic — very unobtrusive, but she really knew her stuff. :)
OT– am trying to get thru pow wow. ;( Boy is Novak combative and rude to anyone who questions him and downright nasty wrt Corn and Wilson and bloggers.
Says Corn is a “nasty piece of work”.
oddball @ 17
Love me now, hate me later! Personally, after spending day after day comping vocals, mixing, cutting custom backing vocal tracks and watching new iterations of the video, I’m a little toasty on the track. But I never listen to my own records anyway.
What I mean to say is thank you!
Novakula is really dishing out the BS right now.
Lesson one, how not to answer the questions….give a detailed history of nothing
Christy Hardin Smith @ 21
She sure did. Everyone just shines with life and passion!
(and I love that blue on you!)
How exciting. This gives us hope.
Christy, did you get a sense of whether there will be real follow-through on the Disney/ABC isssue by President Clinton or any of the other people mis-portrayed in that production?
…a bottle of saline solution opened up in my luggage and drenched everything around it…
C’mon, you’re a smart woman - segregate all your liquids into a ziplock bag for travel. :-)
sweet jesus what a compliment!
I’m so glad to see some thawing between the bloggers (and blog readers, by extension) and the party entrenchees. There has seemed to be an artificial “war” where our observations, information, and labor are brushed off with a “shut up and stick to voting and donating”.
You’re so right that the effort against “The Path to 9/11″ was a beautiful example of concerted effort.
And leave it to Big Dog to see the light and take action. I view it as a very hopeful sign!
Thanks for your debriefing, Christy. [and Twisted, for the tech!]. This meeting may become the tipping point that actually gets the one-way roads of the estabDems interacting and working with the bloggers for maximum positive change and effect.
A synergistic moment indeed. Bridge to the future, even.
Thanks, Christy and Jane, for being our guiding lights on this boulder-strewn road. Will be exciting to
watch this unfoldparticipate in building the synergy even more.Christy Hardin Smith @ 19
The $1,000,000 question. We are both threat and boon. I completely share your vision for the potential of a cooperative relationship, but there are lots of Incumbocrats and their lackeys in the way.
I totally hear ya on the ABC thing, but clearly (to me, at least) the Lamont primary victory pricked up some ears.
op99 at 28 — You know, I had done that, but I had to pull the saline out to clean off my lens after I got something under it on the train, and I put it back into the luggage without bothering to stick it in the bag. (Ooops. Won’t do THAT again. Hello, dry cleaners…)
Good stuff as usual, Christy.
No doubt, Clinton is an impressive dude. A few years ago he paid a visit to some of my family members in Hong Kong (they’re high-profile academics, which over there is something of a celebrity status warranting photo ops with prominent dignitaries and such). Despite disagreements with some of his policy positions, everyone present was uniformly impressed by his broad intellect and, of course, his legendary charisma. They also thought he was a good listener, which was a big compliment and a bit of a surprise to me.
Sounds like your exchange was definitely a step in the right direction. I’m just thankful “we” had someone like you there to represent.
And I’m glad you enjoyed NYC (I’m a commuter from CT, my day job’s in Manhattan — was the food from Sylvia’s?) Oh, and tangentially I’m also pleased that NYC’s coffee culture is expanding…!
Thanks, angie. Yeah, one ad hominem attack after another from Novak. And boy, is Brian Lamb a safe interview for Novak - no fear of dangerous questions from that direction.
I think that was a great first step that will utlimately grant credibility to the liberal blogsphere…I mean who better to meet with than the man himself!!!!
Hopefully now he can get his DLC cronies and other DEMS on board with the Lib Blogesphere with the aim of winning the Pres Election in 08….
Great job guys!!!!!!!!
tommy yum at 32 — well, I’m pretty sure that the Lamont victory had a LOT to do with Jane and I being included. *g*
OT– “Fox news network is very nice” to Novak (his words)
Christy Hardin Smith @ 37
You can always count on me to state the obvious!
I’m proud of you.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 19
That’s important to me, that the left blogosphere doesn’t become just an echo chamber/megaphone for the party establishment. Sure, use each other when interests coincide, but with eyes wide open.
I just think that is such a cool thing for Clinton to have done, request such a meeting and be willing to listen to what they have to say.
I like the pics as well!
Kai at 34 — it was a very interactive meeting — he is a great listener, very sharp and focused on the points that he wants to make, but also willing to consider a counter-point from someone else who has differing opinion, weigh it out and think about how it might change his own thoughts on the issue. (You know, something we rarely see from Bush. SIGH) It was an intriguing meeting in a number of ways.
Oh, and it wasn’t from Sylvia’s, it was a new restaurant whose name I didn’t catch. But the chef came along to serve, and she was so fun — we talked cooking for a few minutes before Clinton came into the room, and I lamented that we weren’t having collard greens instead of spinach. *G* The cornbread was awesome!
Oh, yes, Brian Lamb is trying to rehabilitate Novak. Like pinning water on the wall. To a caller, “Are you calling (dear old) Bob a liar”? I said, “Well, yeah.” Bob knows it was a Democrat asking the question appearing in Republican’s clothing.
Bob always looks like a big fat toad sitting on a leaf croaking about the horror of capital gain taxes. Apologies to my Mom who tried to teach me not to make fun of people.
Christy Hardin Smith @ 36
But not everything. The rapidity of the ABC crock-u-drama response was one example of a stellar FDL performance. Extremely focused and successful. I also think that anyone who has been following the Plame-betrayal case would also be impressed–it would be interesting to know if the Lewinsky brouhaha would’ve even happened if there had been a blogosphere back then checking up on every last little piece of bs that came out of Starr’s office going back to Whitewater and the Paula Jones-Ann Coulter frivolous lawsuit. And holding the MSM’s feet to the fire for stooping to tabloid-level journalism (we are still the laughing stock of the civilized world over that).
OMG, only a very brilliant Christy Hardin Smith would have the foresight to travel with TWO hairdryers.! You have amazing hair, you look incredibly gorgeous as always. And Jane, love the dress. I’m sorry it was such a pain to get these photos up, but you know FDL is going to save you. Twisted, you are the one.
Sounds like a lovely chat. And a necessary one. I want to thank you for hammering home the point about cooperation. We really, really need that right now. So many of us are feeling that we have the time and the energy and could help in some way, but there is so much cross-talk, it’s hard to sort out what’s going on. Wouldn’t it be wonderful to have many more roundtables such as this with all of the leadership? And yes, please - is there anybody listening? - find a new lineup for the talking head shows. Help!
Thanks for the summary, Christy.
However, that’s a mighty white group of people in the picture who met with Bill. I know there are plenty of minority bloggers–Steve Gilliard & Pam Spaulding are two who come immediately to mind–how come they’re missing? Anyone ask Peter Daou since he coordinated the meeting?
It’s a pretty big oversight.
OT– He doesn’t like Chris Matthews and has never seen Jon Stewart and will go to his grave having not seen it.
Bless that caller from Alabama!
And a BIG SHOUT out to Chelsea. 3 cheers for good parent-kid relationships.
(Tommy, I’m with oddball at 17, that tune pops into my head at the most unexpected times…and yes, we may all live to regret your efforts (LOL) YET may it help take us where we want to go first!)
Tommy — in 1962 I was working as a bdcst engr when Birch Bayh (Evan’s Dad) ran for Senate. He used a jingle “Hey look him over - he’s your kind of guy…” based on a pop tune from the period. The damn thing was played over and over. Bdcst folk hated it but it worked!
A coupla years ago I was at a big public event honoring the real Senator Bayh — others praised the jingle but I told him how to this day I still loathe it.
Over-familiarity breeds contempt!
Terry in MD, thanks for Molly — she must have typed that through buckets of tears.
Anybody who missed this 8-minute 2004 speech of Ann’s when Hopie posted it the other night, DON’T MISS IT AGAIN!
Ann Richards vs. the
poor, poor pitifulTSA.Old Sow @ 47
Me 3. Happens at the weirdest times and the weirdest places! Ricky’s voice is infectious–I want to sound like her in my next life.
Good morning, Christy and everyone.
Too early to open the FDL martini lounge, so I’ll buy everyone a gubba goffee (how they say it in NY.)
Twisted Martini @ 52
never too early. I’ll have mine with an olive.
the Preznit is doing his presser at 1115am EDT
will we ever have a smart president again?
(a la bill)
*ilson46201 @ 49
One of the many dismaying revelations I had about “the biz” was when I was told that the big Clear Channel stations had done “burn out” polling on our single. In other words, they figured out how often they could play it before a majority of listeners couldn’t stand it anymore. Which they proceeded to do. I mean, fuck, I love “Strawberry Fields Forever” but don’t play it ten times a day!
The whole point of the track was to be viral. If I had actually expressed my feelings in music it would have sounded a lot more like “White Light/White Heat” (Velvet Underground) than a pop song. Or a primal scream therapy session! It wasn’t really intended to preach to the choir; it was meant as the spoonful of sugar, for to help the medicine go down.
Thus endeth the thread hijack.
Corrine at 46 — there were also several people who appeared by phone. The meeting was put together in a week and a half’s time (I barely was able to coordinate travel plans and The Peanut, frankly, because Mr. ReddHedd had to rearrange his schedule at the last minute.) There were a number of female bloggers physically there, which was great — Kos couldn’t make it because of prior commitments, and I know there were others who were also invited who couldn’t make it either. So don’t make assumptions based solely on four photos that I pulled — especially when I don’t have complete information on who was on the call (John Amato from C&L and Glenn Greenwald were on, I know, but I’m not certain if and who others might have been.). For a first meeting put together on the fly, I thought Peter put together a great group of people who were very passionate about the issues and willing to speak their minds. And I’m certain, if there are more meetings in the future, that others will be included.
lina @ 52
Actually, I think I’ll pass on that one (my stomach cannot bear the thought of straight anything at this hour) but since it is a dark, rainy, cloudy day, maybe a very spicy bloody mary with lots of garlic stuffed olives wouldn’t be so bad!
OK, Bloody Marys or Mimosas?
timewarp @ 59
Ooh, come over here and sit by me!
The issue for the Dems is that the bloggers on our side of the aisle are emphatically not mouthpieces for the leadership. Nor are they media outlets that can be bought like TV or print adspace. Nor are they sycophants.
FDL and the others at that meeting are able to do networked research, writing, distribution and action without the help of any Beltline consultants. While Clinton is talking to the bloggers, the Beltway boys are murmuring words of fear in a Greek chorus off stage. “Their way lies radicalism. If you listen to the bloggers, the whole party will become marginalized.” What they really mean is that their business model is becoming obsolete, and they are scared.
The blogs won’t work as a cheap substitute for consultants. Then the pols won’t get honesty: the bloggers will tell them what they want to hear.
The pols need to buy expensive ads from the blogs and leave the brilliant work to the bloggers and their devoted coteries.
And they need to read and listen, even when the words seem too hard.
One of the things that makes me so mad is that the conversation on TV, and the rest of the media for that matter, is that there is no conversation. I mean no offense to sports fans, but all those locker room interviews? You’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all. How does it feel to win? Are you feeling bad about your loss? How do you think you played today? And the answers are always the same. It feels great! It feels bad, but we’ll be back another day. It’s just the same conversation every time. And it is the same with the Sunday talking head shows. All the lame softball questions and the predictable non-answer cover your ass canned responses. It’s not a conversation, it’s a ritual. With very, very few exceptions, it’s devolved to a dance without music that no one in their right mind believes is genuine. That is why Colbert and Stewart are so brilliant and so revered. It’s unpredictable and fresh.
Christy — a quick drive by to alert you, if you did not already see it, that there is a stunning lead editorial in the NYT today on the detainee/tribunal legislation. It is the best article I’ve seen in the MSM and in both detail and analysis goes well beyond the best reporting I’ve seen in the “news” articles, let alone cable TV commentary. It could have been written by Glenn Greenwald.
This needs spotlighting, either via a post by GG (haven’t checked yet) or by FDL. Regrettably, it can’t be easily copied or dissemimated because it is behind the wall — the best argument I’ve seen for why that policy is self defeating — so if GG doesn’t cover this, perhaps . . .?
George W. Bush on TV at 11:15??? On the west coast, that’s 8:15am. That is just way too early for that kind of nonsense. Is this about the torture duel he wants to have with Congress? Will he finally lose his marbles on national television? Should we watch in the hope?
scarecrow, “Stampeding Congress”?
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09.....5fri1.html
Christy,
Great stuff here, especially the discussion of Democratic political leaders turning to bloggers for prep backgrounders and talking points for the talking head shows. This really should be a no-brainer, but the fact that it’s not shows too much about how insecure and territorial many Hill staffers are — I’ve seen this having worked for a couple of major Dem politicians in the mid-1980s to mid-1990s — that they would rather give mediocre, safe, conventional ideas that they produce than go to someone who inevitably has been spending more time learning and thinking about a particular issue (like you all and emptywheel on Plame) than they ever could.
Of course it’s also a matter of the signals the politicians sends about what they want — one of the guys I worked for was Mario Cuomo, who was very comfortable with combative stuff as long as it was well grounded (and he of course made far more effective use of that grounding than we had done in what we gave him) — but most good Democratic politicians will be open to a strong case for a tougher point of view if you back it up and have thought it through well enough. We’ve seen Reid take lines from bloggers, to good effect.
What I wanted to ask you was this — in the meeting with Clinton, did you all talk about or get any indirect sense that he gets how the core mission of Republicans since 1994 has become to destroy Democrats and destroy our constitutional system? If there’s one thing that’s most infuriating to most bloggers and their readers, it’s to see how we’re not in the relatively comfortable political world of the pre-Clinton impeachment (which really started in the 104th Congress) era yet most Hill Democrats — Lieberman is by far the worst example of this, but the ethos is pervasive — seem to be behaving as if they were still in some collegial world of consensus-oriented policy-making and dealing with Republicans like Everitt Dirksen and Bob Michel. Reid seems to get it but is, it seems, too modest, self-effacing, and self-contained to disabuse his Democratic colleagues of their delusions. Clinton is so widely respected for at least his political smarts by just about all Democrats that he could be very effective in privately conveying this awareness, which potentially can drive all else in political strategy. Do you think he gets it, or that you all in concert could convey this message to him, and that he could be open to raising awareness on the Hill about it?
Obviously he would not want to be very public about this as it would backfire with the media’s corporate stenographers as being incompatible with the dignity of a former President, but he certainly could send powerful messages in private — especially to his former staff like Rahm Emanuel.
1,263 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
FDLers:
Good Mornin’ foxhole buddies, it’s a great new day in the war zone!
Citizen Hardin Smith, it’s great that the upper crust a the progressive blogosphere had audience with Monsignor Big Dog (but where was Blogenfeurer Kos??!!). But did any of you temper your enthusiasm with a bit of wariness with regard to potential “cooption” by the Clintonian tool and die machine. Both Clintons are not only creatures of the DLC, they are by some measure, the next generation of DLC so it would seem that one would wanna have their shit detectors in full operation when dealin’ with ‘em.
I would think that if Clinton really wanned to advance the blogosphere into the mainstream of Democratic Party action-decisionmaking, he could do it in a heart beat but would necessarily lose the potential to coopt it into Hilary’s empire. The cudos to Rahm E and Chuck The Bookeeper are, IMO, very telling about how powerful the tail is on the Big Dog.
But, GEEZE LouEEZE, it is so great that you and Jane were amongst ‘em…did you read the peans to you two gals yesterday in the context of Ann Richards and Barbara Jordon. I want to add my voice to those who proposed that you and Jane are this generation’s Richards and Jordon…I know this father hopes his two daughters will walk on your paths for a mile or two.
KEEP THE FAITH AND KEEP THE AMMUNITION DRY…WE’RE COUNTIN’ ON YOU!!!
Twisted Martini @ 59
Mimosa for me, please! And thank you for asking.
op99 @ 40
I was thinking the same thing. I hope they recognize that we’re a powerful force because we’re intelligent, independent agents, not a top-down message machine like much of the right blogosphere. We do have an advantage in that there’s a model for this — liberal interest groups (however ineffective they are of late) and now MoveOn, DFA, etc., are recognized by the party to have their own agenda that works in congruence but not lockstep with the party. If the leadership can be made to understand that our more dynamic ad-hoc organizations have an element of that, and aren’t just groups of volunteers and contributors to be directed, I think it’ll help us work together.
meta @ 65
It gets worse, at least here in the Bay Area. Darth Cheney is flying in for a fundraiser on the Peninsula this afternoon, which is guaranteed to screw up the PM commute for folks there.
I sense disruption in the Force, Luke . . . Scary, it is, and cold.
And on a Friday afternoon, at that. Of course, considering the guest of honor, that may be the intentional point.
CHS -> I’m very heartened to read this. I’ve been wondering whether there has been any reaching out -any liasons- between the Dem power structure and the ambassadors from Blogistan. That the powers that be see the necessity for such outreach and that it was with someone as powerful and politically astute as the Big Dog is a very welcome sign and a tangible showing that: a) he gets it; and b) they recognize that the NetRoots is a vital and entrenched cauldron of power.
I’m so glad to see the line-up. I can’t think of anyone I’d prefer to see at such a meeting. I’ve been concerned due to the enmity - much of it earned- that seems to exist between the DLC and the progressive tribes. We’ve villified each other ruthlessly…probably earned, but still I think there has to be a recognition that we need to discover shared interests. If we can’t develop working respect and mutual admiration, we can, at the least, learn to cut hard bargains and deals with each other that serve to help us all accomplish our goals.
This is VERY heartening. Thanks!!
about Clinton understanding the threat to democracy some GOP have become — recall that he told Al Gore about the Impeachment : ” It’s a fucking coup d’etat ! “
Twisted Martini @ 59
Mmmm, mimosas! Yes, please!
Re: Off the record
I see no reason why any part of a meeting like this should be off the record. Giving people “private” information is the easiest way to start to co-opt them. It is a pattern the the mainstream media has gotten into and they get played all the time because of it.
Let’s not fall into this trap. Once you hear something off the record you then need to self-censor yourself ever after. Bloggers represent the public, and therefore their should be no secrets.
Next time such a situation comes up excuse yourselves from that portion of the meeting or demand that everything be public.
Ohio Rep. Ney pleads guilty
WASHINGTON - Rep. Bob Ney (news, bio, voting record), R-Ohio, pleaded guilty Friday to making false statements and conspiracy to commit fraud and violating post-employment restrictions for former congressional aides.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200.....ruption_15
1,264 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ IT JUST GOEZ ON AND ON AND..
XYZ:
There is an echo in here…I said last night that I thought next week (or this weekend’s) Lamont pollin would show even better’n the 46-42 that Zogby projected. I still think that this is Lamont’s race to lose and that he’s gunna hafta get caught on tape committin’ a high crime of immorality in the street for Joe Likuderman to win.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION THIS WAR AIN’T OVER BY A LONG SHOT!!!
Peterr, thanks for the warning about Cheney. I hadn’t heard. Where in the world is he going to appear?
Fresh outta mod at 296 last thread, you’ll find something to file under “We Have Our Research and Goopers Have Theirs.”
It’s a Stratfor report called “Iraq: The Policy Dilemma,” preceded by an explanation of how I came into it and what I then found out about Stratfor, a private “strategic intell” provider to Gooper wanting to consider themselves mucky-mucks. The report itself is well-written but flimsy-ish compared to the pro bono thinking we have here.
As will come as no surprise to you . . .
I can see some distrust and wariness, but it would be so easy for them to begin to pick up on some synergy from the blogs without necessarily locking themselves in to “on the record” exchanges that they worry may come back and haunt them later or be provocative if publicized.
Sending out some topics at intervals and having bloggers send responses - just as a data sampling, not as a locked set of position points; keeping a list of expertise for quick research etc.
I’m very glad you mentioned the fact that a different set of talking heads is needed for the shows. Plus - you guys take great pictures.
*ilson — yeah, there’s no question Clinton understood very well what was going on against him, but that was personal, and couldn’t be seen by anyone as systemic with the Republicans at that point because it was the first big example (starting with the Whitewater and Paula Jones garbage, that was all of a piece — impeachment was just the last act).
IOW, does he view impeachment as a one-off that he understands and was concerned about because it was against him personally, or does he see it as the first rocks in what has become an avalanche of Republican attacks on our constitutional system?
Peterr @ 69
Heh. A couple of weeks ago, Bush was going down to George Allen’s home for a fundraiser, and apparently his people asked Virginia officials if they could close the carpool lanes of the main southbound highway from DC for six hours, including most of evening rush hour. (The state officials talked sense into them, and he took a helicopter.) These people don’t care how many peasants they trample on their rides; to them, we’re only here to shout their praises.
OT Question about Ney -> Is it a likelihood that DOJ has gone along with the plea agreement in exchange for Ney’s cooperation with others? Would they typically be entering into an agreement without his willingness to talk?
If that’s the case, this is very heartening news. If I’m not mistaken, most of Ney’s underlings have already plead. This would mean that Ney would be helping to nail other Congress critters or -perhaps- those in leadership above him.
I’m w/ Norske on the co-option potential here, and as robert feinman mentions, the use of ‘off the record’ is one way to start that ball rolling. Perhaps I’m too sick of all the secrecy in the Bush administration, but remember, we don’t want to be like them.
For those following Bush’s attempt to legalize war crimes, I recommend this posting by Marty Lederman over at Balkinization. It’s the first rational explanation I’ve seen of the differences between the administration’s bill and the McCain, Warner, Graham vesion that got the endorsement of the Armed Services Committee yesterday.
According to a short lead-in posting by JB (Jack Balkin) himself:
[…] The key problem, as Marty points out, is that the Administration has simply been unwilling to admit to what it has done and what it would like to keep on doing– in the name of protecting freedom and human rights, of course.
meta @ 76
Deadeye Dick is appearing at a fundraiser for Rep. Randy N. (for Not) Kuhl (pronounced “cool”)(R-Shotgun)next Friday in my town, Rochester NY. Kuhl is opposed by Blue American fightin’ Dem Eric Massa.
robertdfeinman at 75 — well, thanks for sharing but you’ll pardon me if I live in the real world where blabbing every little thing can give the other side an advantage that I’d rather not give them, given they already have a massive messaging advantage as it is. Nothing that was said in the off the record portion came as a surprise to me, but it still is not something that should be blabbed around because, well, sometimes discussions about strategic options or personal opinions about individual public figures or whatever the issue that is publicly controversial — it’s good to be able to have a frank, open, honest discussion instead of couching everything in public, masked language and talking in code. I do enough deciphering between the lines of NYTimes and WaPo article quotes as it is.
Jeebus, this isn’t some sort of tin foil hat meeting where we all bow down and vow to do everything Clinton tells us to do, for hell’s sakes. Every blogger in that room was a strong, professional individual who had their eyes wide open. They would not have invited us otherwise, frankly, because they don’t need to bother with the full treatment for sycophants. This was a fairly frank discussion for a first step — but it was just a first step. And there will be more off the record portions of discussion with people in the future — because it is simply how things work. Period. But neither Jane nor I plan on handing over the keys any time soon — we both like driving, thank you very much.
robertdfeinman — we will have to agree to disagree.
First, bloggers are individuals. They are not representatives of the public; they ARE the public, but not as an aggregate. They do as they see fit.
Second, this meeting clearly had a political component, and not unlike business, some of politics is proprietary and confidential. This was NOT a publicly-funded meeting between elected officials, but a private meeting between individuals in a private venue with a limited amount of proprietary information exchanged. The information exchanged could also be highly personal — like the status of any possible lawsuit being contemplated by Clinton against ABC-Disney. If I were talking with the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton about this specific matter, I would expect standard practice to include execution of a Non-Disclosure Agreement.
Why don’t you save your fire for George Bush, an elected official, who has had numerous closed door private discussions off the record with journalists? Why aren’t you asking about Jeff Gannon-Guckert’s access to the publicly-owned White House? Or ask about any of the elected or appointed Senior Administration Officials who had access to Valerie Wilson Plame’s identity and status and disclosed it in violation of law?
Jeepers. Keep the eyes on the ball — and on the right one.
moe99 — ditto the above for you.
What’s with the concern all of a sudden, from folks who aren’t frequent commenters? And especially concern about Jane and Christy — women who CLEARLY are independent in thought and intense in analytical capacity?
Norske has a great point — remember, Daou is not just a blogger at the meeting, he works for Hillary. I am sure he was smart enough to figure out there is huge and appropriate resistance to Hillary and that the best way to smooth some of that over is to bring out her secret weapon — the Big Dog. This meeting seem to have worked well as a way to get bloggers to feel that they are part of the insider group, rather than external agitators.
I am as big a yellow dog dem as they come. But, there will be increasing pressure for us to do what is deemed best for the party rather than what is best for the country. The Darkblack Lieberman image keffluffle ought to stand as a cautionary tale for what happens when one combines independent blogs and party politics.
They will admit nothing and they will give up on nothing. This is a fight to the death. The Cheney Administration will have it’s way with us no matter how much we protest. It’s called rape. Plain and simple.
mayan @ 81
This is a very important question — we learned AFTYER his plea, that DOJ received no cooperation agreement from Cunningham. Very bad prosecuting there. So, i