by Sheldon Rampton
There is something deeply scary about the Bush administration's efforts to pass the Cheney/Specter bill, which if approved would give the White House unprecedented powers to wiretap and spy on U.S. citizens, without the need to obtain a search warrant. In addition to the threat that this poses to the privacy of all Americans, it particularly threatens journalists.
According to the American Civil Liberties Union critique of the bill, it would "vastly increase the government's statutory power to examine all international phone conversations and emails, making warrantless surveillance of Americans’ conversations the rule rather then the exception and expand the ability to conduct warrantless physical searches of Americans’ homes."
As an example of how this legislation could be abused, consider the situation of my own organization, the Center for Media and Democracy. We are based in the United States, but one of our staff members — Bob Burton, who lives in Australia — works as the editor of our SourceWatch project. Giving the government the ability to examine all international emails without a warrant could mean that even our routine staff communications could come under secret surveillance — ranging from discussions of editorial policy to matters as mundane as staff vacations and the family photos that Bob occasionally sends us. The same thing could happen, of course, to any organization whose employees work outside the United States — which happens to describe every major news outlet, and in particular publications whose reporters are covering the mess in Iraq.
This comes, moreover, at a time when the U.S. military is also planning to spend millions of dollars to monitor and and manipulate journalists. As Walter Pincus reported recently in the Washington Post, "U.S. military leaders in Baghdad have put out for bid a two-year, $20 million public relations contract that calls for extensive monitoring of U.S. and Middle Eastern media in an effort to promote more positive coverage of news from Iraq. The contract calls for assembling a database of selected news stories and assessing their tone as part of a program to provide 'public relations products' that would improve coverage of the military command's performance, according to a statement of work attached to the proposal."
In short, the government will be ranking reporters and news outlets based on how favorable or unfavorable they are to the U.S. military and to the war in Iraq. And $20 million is a lot of money to spend on monitoring the media.
Back when Bill Clinton was president, John Stauber and I wrote an article about then-Secretary of Energy Hazel O'Leary, criticizing her for spending a much smaller amount — $46,500 — to hire a PR firm named Carma International to monitor reporters and rank them according to whether they wrote favorable or unfavorable articles about the Department of Energy. Not only did we criticize this practice, government officials and journalists from across the political spectrum united in condemning it — including even the Clinton administration itself.
Clinton's press secretary, Mike McCurry, said O'Leary showed poor judgment and her media monitoring was "clearly unacceptable." The Washington Post called it "a thoroughly dumb idea." The Washington Times wrote that the Carma contract evoked "the chilling suggestion of a press blacklist." The New York Times said O'Leary had "stepped well beyond the bounds of propriety" and called on Clinton to fire her. Mary Manning, a reporter for the Las Vegas Sun who had criticized the federal government's plans to locate a repository for high-level nuclear waste in Nevada, said that finding herself listed on Carma's roster of "unfavorable" reporters felt like being put on "Nixon's enemy list." She added, "If private companies want to hire a PR firm to monitor the media, that's one thing, but this is the government. If they start making lists of reporters they don't like so they can 'work on us a little,' we have to worry about the fact that they control the police, the FBI, the CIA and the IRS."
At least 77 members of Congress, mostly Republicans, signed on to a letter calling for Clinton to demand O'Leary's resignation. Rep. Joe Barton (R-Tex.) chaired a hearing to investigate the Carma contract, at which Rep. Chris Cox (R-Calif.) complained, "This is about ranking reporters for the purpose of manipulating the press: awarding friends and punishing enemies. Reputations and lives have been destroyed." Tom Coburn, (R-Okla.), said, "My heart's kind of sick today that we're even doing this ... We don't have a money problem. We have a moral problem about how we spend our money."
All of these warnings are even more valid today, when the proposals to grade Americans according to their political thoughts are coming, not from the lowly Department of Energy, but from the Vice President of the United States and the U.S. military. Moreover, these proposals come at a time when the Bush administration's right-wing base is vigorously denouncing journalists as traitors, with some even calling for the editor of the New York Times to be sent to the gas chamber. Nor is it any comfort that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld seems determined to fan these extremist flames, as he did in his recent speech to naval personnel, when he declared that terrorists are "actively manipulating the media in this country."
The White House and Senator Specter would like us to believe that their plan for warrantless wiretaps and other surveillance of American citizens will only be used to trap real terrorists, and that this vast power to engage in secret spying will not be used against journalists, bloggers and other peaceful citizens who challenge their policies. Given the things that they have already done, and the frequency with which they condemn their critics as traitors, we would have to be extraordinarily naive to trust them.
Sheldon Rampton is the co-author, with John Stauber, of several books including The Best War Ever: Lies, Damned Lies and the Mess in Iraq, which was published this month by Tarcher/Penguin.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
What to say?
FireBIGDOGLake!
George Orwell’s 1984 - KKKarl’s favorite book!
Mad Dogs @
3
That and Mein Kampf
Too bad they never read Sun Tzu.
I agree, this is the most important issue facing congress and the American people. I just wish the Dems would get smart on this and redefine and reframe it.
It is the Citizen Surveillance Program
This Republican Congress has not only not performed any oversight, they have authorized every Bush administration failure to date.
Good morning!
Kinda OT, but I need a little help this morning. In the Had Enough? videos (which Howie has so graciously offered to do for our candidate) I need to make absolutely sure that our Rubberstamping incumbent did support the illegal wiretapping. I’m not finding it in his voting record, anyone have a bill # or something to help me pinpoint that info? Thanks!
Great yet chilling post, Christy.
Will it never end?
What’s overlooked in this debate is that all journalist communications are ALREADY monitored, domestic or international. The NSA/CIA spend billions upon billions every year in eavesdropping efforts. Does anyone really believe there are lines in the sand that aren’t routinely crossed? The government doesn’t need statutory permission to wiretap, open mail or place bugs wherever they please. Legal and illegal are abstract, nuisance concepts. Bush will jam through retroactive immunity for anyone accused of breaking any laws anyway. Failing that he can just issue pardons on his way out of office. You’re all being listened in on to some degree, with the more prominent journos, policy wonks, politicians and corporate titans totally under the microscope.
not watching the Bush jokefest, but I hope somebody pushes him over the edge.
windje @ 4
Junya says he was going work on that one over the summer, but he couldn’t find his crayons.
He’s close to flipping out right now. Someone brought up the Powell criticism. Touched a nerve. He’s babbling incoherently.
This is an issue that just makes me feel sick when I contemplate the full implications of this legislation even being proposed, much less passed.
While Bush is certainly to blame for his failure to adhere to the law, I fault Congress for failing to exercise their own oversight responsibilities, and for failing to exact any consequences from the executive branch. I find myself appalled that the government is even talking about torture and warrantless wiretapping and surveillance, much less crafting legislation that approves it.
I said yesterday that the Specter bill might as well go into the category of “faith-based initiative,” as the bill is so vague and so broad that the American people can do little more than have faith that the powers given to the president - and future presidents - in this bill will not be abused.
Where is the accountability? Where are the limits that are supposed to be observed? What is wrong with these people? Obviously, the president knows he is breaking the law, and it astounds me that Specter is going along with the request to shield the president from any liability for having done so.
I know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that if these were things being proposed by a Democratic administration, the GOP would be rioting in the streets, and I can’t for the life of me understand why the Democrats continue to take such a laid-back and passive approach to this.
Yes, Harry Reid has indicated that the Specter bill will not pass, but these Democrats should be going all-out to protest and to educate the public on the ramifications of this kind of legislation.
Honestly, impeachment seems like the least these criminals should be subjected to, but it would be a start.
immanentize @ 7
So chilling that Christy had to publish under the psuedonym of Sheldon Rampton! *g*
Imm made a boo-boo…Imm made a boo-boo! *g*
Now he’s doing the manic thing of cracking jokes and talking folksy and then getting mad again. Talking like a 3 year old in 5 word sentences.
Jesus H. Christ on a unicycle, even if these people think Bush is the Messiah and they’d trust him to shave their genitals with a straight razor, are they so completely unimaginative that the thought of “President Hillary” with these powers never occurs to them?
Or do they all have absolute faith in Diebold and the Thousand Year Right?
May I suggest this talking point…
Who watches the watchers?
Mad Dogs @
12
Is my face red!!
Sorry Sheldon (Christy gave us a heads up on the last thread and I just went to text….)
Mad Dogs @ 9
Also, there isn’t a comic-book version.
Bearpaw @ 14
Oooh, good one!
rat bastahd @
6
is your incumbent on the House Judiciary Committee? they’ve been debating H.R. 5825?
Anne @ 11
And then there is the Courts…isn’t there?
Hello…paging the Courts! You have an urgent message at the white courtesy phone!
My question for Bush:
Would you like American soldiers to be treated the way we treat our enemies?
“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross.” - Sinclair Lewis
Look familiar?
Bearpaw @
14
LOL, this just deserves to be block-quoted. Nice one, Bearpaw.
meta @ 13
And it is sooooo impressive when he gets “faux mad”!
He can’t even get that right.
meta @ 10
Wow, that’s the second near-meltdown in two days in response to that! I sure hope journalists have the balls to keep asking about it.
The tone of the questions are a lot more incredulous than ever before.
Bush ain’t gonna meet with Ahmadinejad “NO”. Great balls of fire, he does not get it at all.
The most dangerous man in the world is the preznit.
“we would have to be extraordinarily naive to trust them.”
Suicidal.I wouldn’t trust them to open a can of beer for fear they’d cut me with the tab.
chimp - i hope people aren’t trying to rewrite the history of saddam. saying that he was a benevolent fellow…
Raw Story headline: Bush’s second-choice VP nominee attacks Republicans
over ‘big brotherism,’ ‘gay bashing’. . . Developing. . .
The guy “Dave” is asking my question
He tells David Gregory that he looks beautiful.
Great question by Gregory.
immanentize @ 31
that guy has been grilling chimpy and snow the last few times i have watched
…in an effort to promote more positive coverage of news from Iraq.
So, for instance, today’s biased liberal media headline Police found 30 bodies bearing signs of torture Friday could be rewritten, “Most Residents of Baghdad Still Alive And Untortured Friday”.
I feel safer already.
So why was Rummy shaking his hand, if he was so bad?
immanentize @ 31
But the question is not being answered. *yawn*
Bush is just trying to cover himself and all the other monsters so they don’t go to the proverbial Hague and it is too late, buddy– y’all already broke the law. There is clarity in the law.
He’s screaming at David now.
Democratic leaders need to engage in this battle, prominently and unequivocally. My sense is that the Republicans are actually quite keen to have a very public intra-GOP “debate” on these issues. Look for endangered Republicans to use the secret prisons and wiretapping stories to distance themselves from Bush, and look for the White House to string this out, then cut a very public deal with those Republicans on both wiretapping and secret prisons. This helps the GOP in at least 4 ways: 1) distracts from Iraq; 2) lets individual Republicans distance themselves from Bush and portray themselves as agents of change, as doing oversight etc; 3) allows the White House to recite its “Defending America” and strengthen its War on Terra credentials while putting on a show of being willing to “work with Congress” and listen to criticism; and 4) (ironically) lets Republicans attack the Democrats as too weak to stand up to the President. At least, that’s how I would play this if I were Karl Rove (eww etc). If you’re interested, I have a post with my take on the secret CIA prisons part of this and Saint McCain’s role in it. http://zaxtracks.blogspot.com/.....watch.html
I’m watching with the sound off. If I listen to that dumb son of a bitch, I’ll have a stroke.
chimpy trying to worm out of answering Dave Gregory. Dave keeps asking. Chimpy pissed now.
I can’t watch the Child-in-Chief, that’s no way to start any day, let alone a Friday.
selise, no Greg Walden is not on the Jud. Committee, but I believe there must have been a House-wide vote on it at point.
Your republic is disintegrating. i don’t think the people of the US realize how little there is left.
Man, the press has really gotten their act together.
When does he start stomping his feet, cause he’s losing it, big-time.
MY point is the imprortant point. Sheesh
angie @ 32
I couldn’t tell it was Gregory — I am watching the Wapo streaming….
Oh, what’s the matter now, Bushie-baby-poo? Why the sudden push for yet another surveillance bill? The White House still doesn’t have enough power? Is that it? We still haven’t caught the al-Qaeda bogeyman that’s hiding under your bed at night, so let’s expand the search?
I guess it is all about oil!
“Idealogical war of the 21st century.”
chimp - imagine an enemy that cant stand what believe in, getting hold of oil resources. or imagine iran w/ nookulur weapon.
so chimpasshole expects us to imagine hypothetical situations but he wont respond to hypothetical questions.
BTW - CNN audio way better than CSPANs right now
He “laks” Kofi…but has no odea what else to say.
Jesus, this is like absurdist theatre.
I keep getting an error message,’Invalid Session I.D.
What is he talking about?!
“Blue helmeted”
Is he just buffing helmets?
Christ, he can’t even pronounce Darfur. “Da-fur”
women being raped is causing him “frustration.”
I’m glad I missed the first part of this presser because this part is really pissing me off.
Chimp - “Im frustrated with the UN concerning the Sudan”
i m lost
meta @ 13
Talking like a 3 year old in 5 word sentences is the way his briefers have to talk to him, and he just repeats it the same way.
meanwhile, we are building trenches around Baghdad and setting up checkpoints in a desperate attempt to “control” anything in Iraq - what a successful plan to spead democracy:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5349398.stm
twolf1 @ 51
C-span 3 has audio also.
The non-reply to David Gregory was instructive. In response to “what if Iran or North Korea were to adopt standards of their ‘interpretation’ of humane treatment for our soldiers?” he basically said “we’re defining these standards, and if they adopted them, that would be great!” It appeared that he was not just rejecting the hypothetical, but (similar to the impression I’ve gotten from other administration lackeys) was impervious to the idea that anyone else could set “international standards.” Call it Boltonism, perhaps…
reporter “HUTCH” asks about eavesdropping program, chimp corrects him saying “we call it the terrist surveillance program”
Lookin forward to going to NY — always an intereting experience for a west texas feller…
Starts off by talking about is “conversations” with 9-11 families and then the 1st chance he gets, slips in a little dig at NYC.
Huge fuckin’ softball — who is McKinnon?
Press conference: In answering a question whether a civil war was already on in Iraq, Bush inadvertently gave the reason for the war in Iraq —- to protect our access to OIL.
I can’t repeat his exact words here, but he said in effect that if we do not prevail in Iraq the region will be in chaos (as if it isn’t already), and endanger our oil sources.
Some reporter just referred to the “eavesdropping program” which Bush quickly corrected as the “terrorist surveillance program.” We can only wish that was true.
He actually believes the average voter is going to buy the idea that the economy is doing great?
chimpy believes the goopers will win in elections because of their record on the economy - cites success with katrina.
now answers a hypothetical saying that he believes dems will raise taxes
ifthethunderdontgetya @ 34
How do they know it was torture? Did they do an autopsy to show if there was organ failure before death? Have they done a thorough examiniation into the hearts and souls of the
torturersinterrogators to see if they actually “intended” to torture? Did they check to see if there had been prior authorization by a superior officer? And really, the bodies were ME right? Arab,Persian,Turk,Kurd whatever - that means they were enemy combatants doesn’t it Some of them probably were wearing a Casio watch, or drab clothing -This country is unrecognizable and there is not one person in the Administration that you can view with any credibility.
I thought we’d reached the apex awhile back when a Fed Dist Ct judge in open court had to question a DOJ lawyer as to why they should be believed (in their statements to the court - that’s what the Bushleague lawyers have done to this country) but it’s just gone on and on from there.
Who would this be that Raw Story is promising us?
Bush’s second-choice VP nominee attacks Republicans over ‘big brotherism,’ ‘gay bashing’. . . Developing. . .
Siun @ 59
The Baghdad Pale . . .
So, apparently, our legislation will clarify Common Article 3 for the entire global community…
Court decision on terrorist surveillance was “flawed.”
GOP record on the economy is strong (man, is he out of touch). Aren’t those tax cuts great?Doesn’t believe Dems will take over. Dems will raise taxes on working people - they will call them taxes on the rich, but that’s not how it really works…apparently that MBA is just a goddamned piece of paper, too. Wants the election to be about economic performance.
1,264 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ JUST GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Thank you (SLAP!!) Sheldon, I needed that…Now is there anyone out there that really wants to argue about whether or not we are dealin’ with real, live, to-the death FASCISM here??!!
We need to crank up the heat in this election battle because I am convinced that Bush will break before November and try to suspend the Constitution and the elections if the tide keeps building against ‘im.
These folks are not isolated nutcases…they are elected leaders, lifetime-appointed judges, military commanders and insulated leaders of World Banks. The organized reserve army for the corporate-fascist oligarchy have been sayin’ out loud for decades that “we have people everywhere in positions of power”. The “Mein Kamf” for the fascist beast was published in 1996 as the manifesto of The New American Century…it’s not as though this is a surprise here folks!!!
KEEP THE FAITH AND FOR GOD’S SAKE LOAD UP SOME A THAT AMMUNITION…WE’RE ALL GUNNA NEED IT BEFORE THIS IS OVER!!!
immanentize @ 64
Either Jeff Gannon’s “bottom” or KKKarl “The Weasel” Rove’s gofer for another roll of TP.
reporter asks about people saying dems want to protect terrists more than americans
chimpy - i wouldn’t put it exactly that way. but look at the patriot act.
wtf was that mumbling stumble??? mwhmmmmsmsmeem smmw (sounded like that)
“i dont question the patriotism of people that dont agree w/ me” B.S.
Sorry, Stephen P, didn’t see ya had it aleady.
Marc @ 15
“Who will guard the guardians.” Robert Heinlein
That is a great name — IEP — I agree with the President on calling it the “Illegal Evesdropping Program.”
Uh, er, um. Errr…
He doesn’t question the patriotism of those who disagree with him - it’s a difference of opinion.
(We gotta change this from the Terrorist Surveillance Program to what it really is…)
He is just dying to call Anne Richards a lesbian.
Chimpy giggles weirdly while saying “what was it you called it - the illegal eavesdropping program? - iep instead of tsp” hahahahaha
Can’t even string together an appropriate comment about Ann Richards…what an idiot he is.
Chimpy on CNN - talking about Ann Richards. stuttering and leaving long pauses, no coherent string of words.
“Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?” — Juvenal
Interesting how chastizing the UN about Darfur shows his ability to talk in detail about atrocious events like women getting dragged out of their homes and raped, but a question about events suggestive of civil war in Iraq elicits nothing.
-ck- @ 70
So Rumsfeld’s “modern army” plan involved moats.
Wow - maybe he’ll work up to catapults before Bush is out of office
Won’t someone ask him about pressuring military JAGs to sign his phony letter?
Is he still talking? I didn’t think his handlers let him go this long between naps.
Chimpy on CNN - grunts every time there is a question he doesnt like (as usual)
article 3 of the geneva conventions is very hard for normal citizens to understand - so he’s going to tell us about it because it’s a ‘vague’
I took a phone call and have missed the last 15 mintues. And he’s still on. Wow, he’s really trying to hog the limelight. Over-explaining is bound to get him in trouble, no?
Siun @ 79
Numbnutz probably doesn’t realize that an IEP is an Individualized Education Program that special education teachers write for their students. He doesn’t realize it because his teachers never showed him his.
Muzzy @ 83
After all, he only has women dragged from their homes and kidnapped to get their husbands to turn themselves in. Way different.
Well, except for a few stray 14 yos.
The SNL skit of a debate between Bush I and Dukakis keeps going through my head, with a paraphrase of Jon Lovitz’s great line being applied to Dubya:
I can’t believe dems LOST to this guy! Twice!!
He can’t answer a question directly. Unwilling to listen to other opinions, even from his allies. Unable to consider the possibility that others might have something to contribute. Belittling of those who question him. Contemptuous of those who oppose him.
David Gregory’s question was crystal clear, and if I were an undercover DOD or CIA intelligence operative without official cover, Dubya’s answer would scare me to death that my commander in chief is going to get me tortured and killed.
Of course, if I were a DOD or CIA intelligence operative without official cover, I’d have thought that way ever since Valerie was outed.
The public key encryption nerds have been worried about all this for at least 25 years. They have prepared a smorgasbord of possible ways to mitigate the problem, ranging from IPSEC to SSL to PGP to steganography to onion routers.
It’s not nice, but now that we really need these techniques, we should thank these prescient inventors and start partaking of the fruits of their labors.
Been waiting for Sun Tzu to pop back up in comments. I want to read the Tzu and would appreciate a recommendation of the best version. Any thoughts?
Also on Cheney/Specter obviously the most important issue to Cheney/Bush is retro immunity for countless past violations of law. I hope they don’t let this slip through in any bill! That may very well be Conyers future ace in the hole and they wont lose this fight without an all out war. Accountability dammit!
re prior assertions about future troop levels “are you moving the goal posts, Mr. President?” ouch. reeling again.
Oh good one: troops coming home when the Iraqi government decides they can come home!
we NEED to put this in the perspective nobody would argue with
the ‘breaking the law”, “against the constitution”, “violating my privacy” won’t work
we need to point out that with this program they will steal
with this program and no warrants, with no doubt they can steal your company secrets, with the financial information they are able to gather they can take over your most valuable contracts, find your sources, they can out bid you, they can glean the people who have become your personal contacts you’ve spent your entire carreer to discover, they can steal your trade secrets, they can tell where you’ve been, where you are going, what you are doing, what you have done, what you are buying, to who you are selling, what price you pay, what price you get, how you manufacture your goods, how you develope your product
that’s the short list and only the first few things that come to mind, the long list is too tiresome to post.
ONCE keeping our personal affairs private was a concervative position…how easy for “party loyalists” to change…”concervatives” have abaindoned yet another princicple…surprise surprse…are there any left?
they not only think it’s fine and dandy (now), they get mad if anyone exposes these crimes commited against Americans…why is this postition no longer a principle of the republican party?… their “party” leader wants to do it that’s why, so “let’s just abandon ALL of our principles why don’t we.”.
the most important thing to which you have closed your eyes;
there is NOTHING that would not have been gathered WITH warrants and WITHOUT breaking the both the law and the oath this president made to god and country
nothing…not one thing….nada…zilcho…zero…ummm…nothing
the ONLY reason to conduct searches without warrants is if you want to gather information that has nothing to do with national security, information nobody would agree you should have.
Chimpy on CNN - is he harder to follow today than usual or do I need more coffee?
-mentions building a berm around baghdad (as Old Sow pointed out at end of late night thread)
-shorter chimp - “i reeeelly want the trupes to kome home”
Bush says terrorists ‘are coming again’
*ilson46201 @ 82
“Who bells the cat?” — Aesop
Yo, Pakistan is a sovereign nation. You gotta be invited in.
What was Iraq?
Re Mary - “After all, he only has women dragged from their homes and kidnapped to get their husbands to turn themselves in. Way different.
Well, except for a few stray 14 yos.”
Good Lord. What a reminder.
Did he just say, “The Paks?” for Pakistanis?
Wow
By Bush’s “logic”, isn’t Pakistan a state sponsor of terrorism for harboring Bin Laden?
He called the Pakistanis Paks just like Cheney did on MTP– it is an insult!
Bush: We can’t send in troops to Pakistan to go after OBL because Pakistan is a “sovereign nation.”
And Iraq is chopped chicken liver?
Pakistan is a sovereign nation? So was Germany.
Jesus.
In spite of the fact that he has said that he doesn’t spend much time thinking about bin laden, it is only an urban myth that he doesn’t spend much time thinking about bin laden.
angie @ 98
Or Afghanistan?
Paks
Japs
Huns
Niggers
Mary @ 68
They’re living in they’re own “reality” thingie they made for themselves.
Ya know…that one with all the purty colors and with all their BFFs like Huey, Dewey, Louie, Micky and Goofy. All courtesy of Disney
Peterr @ 98
Who kicks the murdering moron’s ass up between his shoulderblades? (Oops, too harsh?)
OMG, he just mentioned the Third Awakening. HELPPPPP.
Cozumel @ 105
Yeah, Coz you are right, of course!
Chimpy on CNN - sounds like 2 more questions.
asked about sending more resources to get OBL
chimp - Pakistan’s a sovereign nation, we have to be invited to go in before we can go in.
(someone needs to ask him what sovereign means, he has proved before that he has no idea)
“I just read a book on abraham lincoln” gots ta let people know dat i can read
Ooo…OOOO…don’t forget this interesting tidbit:
“Testing weapons on testy US mobs” http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/09/.....index.html
Nonlethal weapons such as high-power microwave devices should be used on American citizens in crowd-control sit