
As Christy reported, Judge Reggie Walton set the start date for Scooter Libby’s trial last week. Jury selection begins on January 16, and the trial starts immediately thereafter. I’ve got to give Jennifer Nix a couple of months to do her magic with the manuscript, so that means I’ve got just over two months to write this book.
Since so many FDL readers have already contributed to this project, it’s only fair that I tell you what it will include and how I expect to get it done in time.
Our goal is to bring this book out just in time for the trial. We’ve got three goals for it
- Provide a primer of the events and the people involved in the Plame Leak so those just tuning in as Scooter takes the stand will know how he got there
- Show how the cocktail weenie culture of Beltway journalism was complicit in the leak, both during the actual leak phase, and in helping Libby and Rove game the investigation
- Challenge the narrative Libby’s lawyers want to tell about the events
When Scooter Libby’s lawyers try to pretend Judy Miller is someone who would lie to incriminate Libby, this book will remind the public that Judy Miller bent over backward to save Libby’ ass.
So how am I going to get it done in time?
As some of you have guessed, this thing didn’t just come out of the blue. Jane and I first talked about this at YearlyKos. After I returned home in June, I finished up my most recent Anatomy of a White House Smear series, which covers everything except Novak’s and Armitage’s recent disclosures. That’s already 35,000 words long, and this book is targeted to be 55,000 words long. I’m going to have to totally rewrite that, though, because the Anatomy series wasn’t written for people who were just tuning into the story.
In addition, there are three chapters and a Preface which aren’t included or developed fully in the Anatomy series. I’ll add a chapter showing that the Administration had been warned their WMD claims were false. I’ll have a chapter integrating the beginning of the leak more closely with Judy Miller’s reporting in Iraq. And I’ll have a chapter showing how the administration laundered classified information through journalists so they could use it to support their claims for war. I’ve made a substantial start to all three of these chapters.
Then, there’s the stuff I am adding to turn my “deep in the weeds” details into a story that does justice to the archetypal scope of both the villains and heroes of this story. Jane’s giving me her best Hollywood coaching on this stuff, for which I am very grateful.
And finally, there are the developments to come. One of the biggest advantages of the blogs to books format is its timeliness. We will integrate events that occur just over a month before the trial. Who knows? Maybe I’ll get to tell the story of a Cheney indictment! In any case, the best way to stay up to date—and make sure crummy journalists don’t set this narrative unchallenged—is to continue blogging the subject.
I intend to continue blogging—and updating my narrative as I go.
Which leaves the Preface, which is where you all get to contribute … again. The Preface is where we explain to those unfamiliar with the Internets, blogs, and particularly the Firedoglake and Plameologist communities, why a bunch of ordinary citizens have spent so much time following this story. We’re going to explain what we as bloggers and commentors brought to this story that the traditional media couldn’t, or wouldn’t. We’re going to claim credit for our scoops. And we’re going to talk about the importance of citizen journalism, particularly in an era where the government is trying to protect its power by cowing us into silence.
I’ve already started drafting the Preface. But I could use your help. I’d like to use this thread as a brainstorming session to make sure I don’t forget anything important and to make sure the Preface reflects the viewpoints of the community. So in the thread, please provide your feedback on the three following questions:
- What are the scoops the blogosphere has gotten before the mainstream media—things like eRiposte’s work on the Niger forgeries, Jane’s scoop on Viveca Novak or Christy’s and my discovery of Libby’s insta-declassification of the NIE?
- What are the special skills and contributions the blogosphere has brought to this story—things like Christy’s and Jeralyn’s expertise as lawyers, or pollyusa’s and the DKos Plame Timeline’s remarkable catalogs of all the events and the coverage of the scandal?
- Why does this matter to you? Particularly if you first came to FDL because of Jane’s and Christy’s Plame coverage (or TNH because of my own Plame obsessions), what was it about the story that you thought was so compelling?
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

FITZ!
MARCY!
Truth!!!
Justice!!!
And Marcy Wheeler!!!
Olbermann!
I actually think I may have finished the “Administration knew their claims were false” last night–well, drafting it, anyway.
If you can, please go to the donate link below the thermometer on the right sidebar to help us reach our goal to finance Marcy’s book publication.
Thanks, and thanks to those (including my Mom) who have already donated (Mom kicked in a C-note, beating my $50).
Oh, and repeat contributions are accepted ;-}
And don’t forget to donate to the book right up there ^ by the thermometer.
$100 bucks from 650 readers should be doable although any amount you contribute is most appreciated.
Donate here: CIA Leak Investigation Book by Marcy Wheeler
All that, and a bag of chips!!!
Why is this important to me?
Because I am an American citizen who believes in the rule of law; I find it an outrage that an operative working under deepest cover, at risk to themselves and loved ones for the sake of this country, could be so callously treated, could be expended like so much used tissue by men who have never faced comparable risks in their lifetimes.
Because I am a mother, the co-head of a family, and I’m fed up with the blather of the right-wing about progressives’ perceived lack of so-called family values. Why is the right-wing not as outraged about the outing of a mother of toddlers, and the exposure of all the other families she surely was in contact with during her service to our country?
That’s for starters.
Go, Marcy, go!!!
Thanks for that Pach–Javascript has just declared me dead to it, so I’m having trouble linking anything!!
Marcy – this is getting exciting! Here’s another chunk for this most essential book!
Thank you so much.
Question 4: What should the title be? [Can we have a contest to name it?]
Looks like a good thread to discuss OT’s on prior threads.
Just a quick reminder. I have noticed a chorus of folks who want to donate but cannot and or will not use paypal.
scarecrow @ 12
Tenatively it’s “16 words.” But I don’t know whether the folks running this show like that or not.
Eureka Springs, AR @ 14
Yes, people have been asking for a PO box — there is at least one request every time I post the donate link in the comments.
Eureka Springs, AR @ 14
Very true – I bet there are thousands of dollars in the form of checks that will roll in once you set up a P.O. box!
Thank you for performing this service. I eagerly await the book and my donation has been made via paypal (last week).
Rayne @ 9
Rayne
Thanks. That’s precisely the kind of thing I want to include in the preface.
“About Those Sixteen Words”
Why does this matter to you? Particularly if you first came to FDL because of Jane’s and Christy’s Plame coverage (or TNH because of my own Plame obsessions), what was it about the story that you thought was so compelling?
That’s why I first showed up, and that’s when FDL took off like a jet Plame.
Why? It was an egregious, easy to fathom atrocity, with appealing protagonists and evil villains. And I was ramping back up my interest in politics following my deep mourning after the 2004 election debacle.
hey, there’s a picture up top now :)
Dem campaign spot:
Clusterfuck on screen sayin “Our strategy is simple- as Iraqis stand up- american troops will stand down- and we will leave”
Freeze frame on Clusterfuck’s moronic face
Candidate voice over:
“So 300,000 Iraqi troops have stood up. How many american troops have stood down? None- the president has actually sent MORE troops. This is the man running our country- my opponent has supported his positions 95% of the time- vote democrat- your future depends on it.”
Amy Goodman discussed this issue today…see Democracy NOW with Michael Isikoff and David Corn.
What a lot of work, EW, and how amazing on so short a deadline. We all are pulling for you.
I think my attraction to the Plame story was that, back when Bush’s numbers were still above 50% and most of the public was still being fooled most of the time, here was a chance, a real shot at catching them at their game–and maybe catching the biggest, fattest targets red-handed. Patrick Fizgerald seemed like our last, best hope of getting the b******s and maybe just saving this republic. And irony or ironies, given all the crimes they have committed, he may still be.
—
twolf1 @
20
Oh thank god–I thought I had lost Dick and Bush.
That’s Bush handing Dick the 16 words. All a formality, I think, Bush returning the favor for Dick giving him those lies he told in the first place.
Amazing what you can learn by reading the White House Press Briefings:
Q I also have a question about troops, the troops in Afghanistan, Tony. How does the administration feel about the NATO debate about sending more troops in? The President, of course, last night said that administration efforts have chased the Taliban from power, but they’re threatening in the south.
MR. SNOW: Well, they’re threatening in the — there are several things going on, Peter. And this actually — some of this answer is going to apply to Iraq, as well, so I’m going to broaden it beyond your original question. The strategy both in Iran and Iraq is to get more troops on the ground.
Q You mean Afghanistan.
MR. SNOW: What did I say?
(from Sept 12 2006)
The Plame outing was this administration in a nutshell: vindictive, dishonest, contempt for the institutions of this government, secretive, and a knack for guaranteeing long-term catastrophe for short-term gain. I still believe it will be their undoing.
I so appreciate your efforts to date, Marcy, and wish you every success with the book. Godspeed.
“16 Words”
You might want to sex up the title a bit.
How about “Betrayal: How the Bush Administration Exposed a CIA Agent and Endangered America”
Okay, mine might be a little over the top… but “16 Words” seems, to me at least, a little wonkish for the general public.
emptywheel @ 24
They both look like they’re giggling a little in the picture.
Off topic just a little bit from the prior thread(where it was off topic), but the house is having a hearing on warrantless wiretaps on CSPAN. One witness just called the Wilson bill pernicious.
In the few minutes since then the hearing has gotten quite hot in a genial sort of way
*xyz @ 27
I agree. It’s not in the public consciousness yet. But it will be after they read Marcy’s book!
No offense to anyone, but the only two things that truly matter are the commitment to the whole, unvarnished truth and perseverence that bloggers have shown.
The personal qualities mentioned above have nothing to do with the meduim of blogging. Though without blogs (and the internet), the ability to diseminate the information widely and quickly would be lacking, as would all the feedback.
Why does it matter to me? I may vehemently dislike their policies and the reasons for their policies, but I can’t abide (I really can’t) moronity, incompetence, lies, corruption, cronyism, hubris and many other things the Bush Administration has come to represent. I don’t hold myself to different standards and I expect elected officials, regardless of party (whether I voted for them or not) to abide by those standards as well. For a very hip and cool Evil Parallel Universe, I guess I am old fashioned in some ways.
there’s always “snakes on a plame”
I’m one of those who came to FDL because of the Plame story. What bowled me over is the truly professional insights given to people like me who don’t know a lot about the legal system and how it really works. I’ll never be able to tell a dumb lawyer joke again. Blogging lawyers rule!
And hypocracy. I can’t believe I left that out.
emptywheel @ 14
Oops. I just realized this is a little like asking expectant parents whether they have a name for the baby. Never ask.
But the idea of “16 words” makes sense.
I came to FDL because of the Plame coverage. It was a LONG time ago, when no one knew anything.
I knew that there were big gaps in the MSM story, and I wanted to find out what was happening. I was in college during Watergate, and I knew that good investigative skills could save a country.
I wanted to know that there were good people asking hard questions. I wanted to be part of a collective, networked inquiry, a Q&A with a purpose. ReddHedd (as she once was known) and Jane were able to keep pounding away on this, so that “Move along. Nothing to see here.” was patently absurd.
I also tend to see the worst kinds of nefarious networks with scant evidence. The careful, logical slogging through published evidence and the links to your work and others’ made the emergent denouement less like the twilight zone. This is much more like a particularly gripping episode of a Raymond Burr drama. Understated. Authoritative. Irresistable and addictive.
That’s “irony of ironies” at 23….
The Plame story is most interesting to me because I want to believe in someone and I choose Joseph Wilson. He is my idea of a true Patriot. Someone who worked for our side with few accolades and never looked for at-a-boys from the bureaucracy. He saved the Embassy personnel in Iraq at his own peril and as far as I can tell, tried to keep his mouth shut about the Bush administration’s BS until he saw they were lying to the American people about Iraq. I don’t hate Bush(well maybe Darth Cheney),I just want justice for the Wilson’s.
Emptywheel –
I had an opportunity last weekend to meet the Director of the FBI. As people here know, I asked for (and received — thanks!!!!) input on what I should ask him, given the chance.
It was a great experience in large part because I was able to separate the questions that best express what I feel like:
“When are you going to arrest the President?”
With the reasons I want him to answer that question. LHP and Mary4 and Anne and others helped me get to that point.
What my questioned ended up as (complete with preface) was:
“Many here teach law students — future lawyers. We generally teach that the Congress makes the laws, the executive faithfully executes the laws and the Judicial branch interprets the laws. It seems that currently, there is some idea that the executive is responsible for making and interpreting the laws, not just executing the laws as enacted by Congress and interpreted by the courts. How does the FBI see its role in this question of the source of law in this country? As an executive agency, do feel bound by the executive alone, or do you currently follow the congressional text/judicial interpretation structure?”
Never got answered.
BUT — the point is, the reason I ask that question is the same that the Libby story is so critical. we are currently on a new adventure in constitutional structure. It is primarily a discussion about who holds the authority to decide what is lawful. What is right or wrong is a political (or moral) dispute. That discussion should happen outside the question of what the law allows or proscribes. Whether we follow a person or a set of laws mutually agreed upon by the community was, I though, the fundamental decision of the framers — choosing the community over the King. We are now rethinking that same question. And although it is heady stuff for scholars and philosophers to debate, the practical effects of this ultimate and critical discussion appear in seemingly small ways.
One place that this new urge to allow the rule of one man to thwart the decisions and best interests of the many has played out is in the Plame affair.
2 threads at once
[Mod Note]: twolf1, the FDL timeclock got a little screwy. You got a sneak preview of the 4:00 thread. Pretty good one, ain’t it?
Brainstorming titles:
“The Big Lie”
“National Insecurity”
. . . .
That’s all I’ve got so far. Also, a book like this needs a subtitle, such as “How Bush and Cheney Betrayed America” or some such thing. Maybe you need to get the Plame name in there, I dunno.
STELLARTON, Nova Scotia (AP) — U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice acknowledged “difficult going” fighting a resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan but insisted Tuesday that the world cannot afford to pull out now.
“We owe it to the people of Afghanistan to help them finish the job,” Rice said as she thanked Canada for its role as a leader of NATO forces in the country.
So where was Condi when the Afghan govt was sayin that if the US didn’t send money they were goin under? In Iraq- that’s where. Clusterfuck stiffed em- and now the mayor of Kabul is goin down.
Clusterfuck’s such a dumbfuck!
Although there’s something stealth and clandestine about the title 16 Words that does evoke intrigue and a bit of mystery. Marcy may be 100% genius with this title, after all. :)
This matters to me because:
I want to watch ESPN again, and will end my boycott when ABC agrees to produce the film of Marcy’s book gratis, without commercials, using only FDL staff. I get to be ‘Best Boy’. Or ‘Gaffer’. What are those, anyway?
Now on to the fun:
Title: Plame On! The Bloggers Who Torched BushCo.
Starring:
Valerie Plame-Wilson ___ Gisele Bundchen
Joseph Wilson ___ Jon Stewart
Irving Libby ___ Paul Reubens
Ideas anyone?
rwcole @ 43
I gotta say I hate what they have done to Afghanistan, Iraq and the world. I am going to go cook dinner now and hope to get back to emptywheel’s question when I can get the steam out of my ears.
From the minute I heard about the outing of Valerie Plame I was certain that this was a very deep story. Because of my upbringing in a family with connections to aeronautics and the military industrial complex and having known Intelligence folk my whole life, I sensed hundreds of people were potentially involved and endangered. I knew that this heinous action meant the destruction of a structure that had taken years to develop and regardless of the area of expertise, that great damage had been done to our national security. And then we learned that the area of intelligence gathering was about nuclear activities in the Middle East……..
And then it was so blatantly politically motivated, and I so loathe and dispise this administration. I don’t recall just how I “found” FDL, but when I did arrive here, it was clear that I had found my home. The connections/links that brought me into the arena of the rest of the people, like you, Marcy, who are devotees of learning the truth about this situation has brought some hope into my life that justice will be served!!
So go fitz, and thanks to all the great people who are so much a part of my life now.
EW:
I have yet to comment over at TNH about how thankful and excited I am about the project (I have contributed some $).
There are a combination of several factors as to why I was so taken by the Plame scandal. First, it struck at the heart of the biggest tragedy and crime that this administration put us through: lying us into the war. The Administration’s Plame/Wilson pushback was their dastardly attempt to protect themselves from exposure as frauds. It is quite a dramatic story.
Second, it lifted up the veil and allowed us to see the disgusting underbelly of this secretive and corrupt administration.
Third, as a criminal defense attorney, I am always fascinated by a good crime story, particularly the mens rea and motives of the different participants as well as the futile attempts to coverup criminal behavior.
Finally, the story brought some extremely fine and perceptive minds to the forefront and allowed logic (as well as creativity) to enter into the discussion.
The time I spent reading EW’s and Christy’s and Jeralyn’s posts was invigorating and helped me to believe that this country can rebound from the depths that the criminal syndicate in charge of this country had lowered us.
Hope that helps.
JK
OT, as usual. (I must confess that I’m always off topic in my life too, but here I have the excuse of twirling around the globe on a different time and season for coming off schedule to any party at FDL).
On another thread, poormary was talking about children’s books and the Left Behind series. May I suggest the Redwall series for children to her, by Brian Jacques? They are long, though, and that may not work with the point system your child’s school is having (funny how the program often works against what it is proposing).
But I want to give a shout out for reading aloud to children long past the time that they can read themselves. My husband is 40 plus years older than our offspring. He is an old school, Naval Academy grad, an engineer, who has little emotional vocab (other than spitting nails anger at the Bushco cronies), who dearly loves his children but for the life of him can’t figure out why they aren’t like he was in the 1950’s.
What he did do (and still does), though, was read to them. Always and often. He has read The Count of Monte Cristo aloud. Twice. (the kids are six years apart). It is 1000 pages. He has read volumes and volumes. The daughter is now 22 and across the ocean. When they are next together, he will pick up the volume of Dumas where they last were and he will read to her.
My son is 16 and he just picked a book about Napolean. His dad reads to him while he cleans his room (that could take lengthy volumes).
My husband has traveled through time and space and emotions he can’t particularly voice himself with his children. He has planted the sound of a sentence and the arch of a narrative in their ears and their brains. He has given them a rich vocabulary from inside out. I may be the writing teacher, but the engineer gave them the key to being good writers.
Sorry for the long digression. It does relate, though, as we need to teach our children the language, from inside out, so they will be less susceptible to having it used against them. They need to own their words and the meanings behind them.
Evil Parallel Universe @
34
hypocrisy too !
Jenny from the Blog @ 43
Well, it was actually a friend who thought of it.
He talked me out of “Sources and Methods.”
Marcy, thaks so much for taking this one on!
A little backstory: even though I was opposed to the Iraq war from the get-go, Powell’s infamous UN speech sealed the deal for me that the Iraq war was a frame job writ large. When the Joe Wilson op-ed was published in the NYT followed by the Valerie Plame Wilson outing, I went ballistic and haven’t returned to Earth since.
I fought through an earlier war and I’ve seen good men die for this country and what it stands for. So what does it say now that its government would out one of its own deeply covert intel agents just to save a few votes in an election? And how can a government even begin to function when its own secrets, if one actually buys into the currently-operative cover story, can be promiscuously disclosed in a casual conversation by some Uncle Fester look-alike running his mouth?
There has to be accountability here for all our sakes, and justice (remember that?) has to be done on behalf of the Wilsons. Period.
To your question concerning sources, I remember that Josh Marshall and Laura Rozen were collaborating on the SISMI part of the Niger document forgery story back in ‘30-’04. IIRC, they were partially scooped, but they still might be a good source for background details.
Oh, and Godspeed!
Good luck with this book!
Because rule of law matters to me. The future of America matters to me. Bush has violated so many laws and priniciples of American democracy and decency. Bush is destroying all that is good about America. This outing of a CIA officer is something a regular person can understand, i.e. blowing a spy’s cover is bad. I began following this to see how it would be presented to the public and whether justice could still be done in this country.
I came to FDL because of Plamegate. Simply put there was no traditional news outlet for what FDL gave me: breaking news, insightful legal analysis in plain English but not dumbed down for a 5th grade intellect besides the 5th Grade reading level, fact checking, and comprehensive coverage. Also, the news wasn’t tainted by the MSM’s he-said-she-said stenography that they insincerely call “journalism”.
Also, it was refreshing to be among people who wanted to think and discuss important things in a civilized manner.
*ilson – Remember, there is metric spelling in the EPU.
The MSM, even at its best, is a mile wide and an inch deep, and that is especially true of broadcast journalism. Heck, reading the NYT cover to cover everyday on a 3 hour RT commute to NYC comes nowhere near what can be found on a blog.
I was outraged by Plame’s outing, and the MSM don’t cut it. I wanted inch wide and mile deep coverage.
An added attraction is interactivity, the ability to ask a question or engage in a bit of dialogue. Its also a rapid response medium.
Thanks for all of your work. I have saved virtually all of your posts in searchable doc files.
windje
And are you really sure it is a mistake? It does work on many levels.
I found FDL because it was mentioned in an article in the New York Observer as a good source of information regarding the Fitzgerald information. How long ago was that? Feels like ages. So much has happened.
EW -
It’s the kind of title that could be remembered for a very long time (not to be too hyperbolic) but I’m liking it more and more.
SIXTEEN WORDS. Kudos to your friend. You do know that so many brilliant playwrights (Joe Orton comes to mind) could never write their own titles. It’s just one of those marketing things that eludes the creative mind, sometimes.
Good luck with the book…
Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) Calls Out Cheney For Continuing To Push Faulty Intelligence
Sixteen Words is a great title, but only for the really hard core junkies who follow this stuff. I think you should call it what it is: Treason: The betrayal of an undercover CIA agent for political gain.
In-joke titles seem clever but they can be too clever. A physicist named Woit (I think) just published a book called “Not Even Wrong” about the problems with string theory, but only those who know something about Wolfgang Pauli would have gotten it. In his case it was OK because only the people who got the joke would be able to understand the book, but in your case you are going for the greater American public, so don’t be subtle. BTW I kicked in my C note.
emptywheel @ 24
If you keep writing salacious prose like that, it should be a runaway best seller.
al-Scooter @ 51
You’re right. JMM, in particular, also covered the Plame story heavily from the start. One of my favorite posts of his is when he shows how, when Novak has used the term “operative” in regards to intelligence professionals, he has always used it to refer to someone who was covert.
Jenny – You do know that Harold Robbins said that once he thought up a title, it only took him a week to write a book. The title was the difficult part.
If you wanted to sex-up the title, I would add a “THE”:
THE SIXTEEN WORDS
(How Political Pushback Compromised Our Future)
Let me add one other thing, focusing more on the book itself. I know that it appears that the general outline and goals have been established.
But to really catapult it into the stratosphere (and to potentially get the talking heads talking about the real implications of plame), I would suggest that you make a thesis/subtitle of the book this:
“How the evidence available to the public strongly suggests (or shows) that the Vice President of the United States was behind the outing of a spy”.
How can the public ignore that? It’s what you have been saying over and over again over at TNH. Isn’t that the book you would love to write?
The Spy Who Was Thrown Out into the Cold (and Under A Bus)
Evil Parallel Universe @ 62
EPU – I laugh because it is so true! It’s a whole other chunk of the brain that seems to conflict with the art part. For example, most painters I know can neither title nor frame their work. It’s pretty funny and I love the counter-intuitiveness of the whole phenomena.
I think the title of Marcy’s book should be a little off-kilter and not too wonky. I like the brevity of the title she’s chosen, and she can also, (as Pach mentioned) have a subtitle that gives a clear description of what’s inside the covers…
Alphabetically, 16 Words trumps almost anything else. Very important if you’re listing it in the Yellow Pages.
Main title – OUTED
Subtitle – Scooter was a bad dog
BTW and OT – NZ expat I feel your pain. I commute between US and Oz and never know what day it, what season it is, what time it is or how to spell anything. And no, it isn’t (just) senility.
Good one, petedownunder. I was just thinking that Le Carre taught me that there is a reason for every betrayal. And often not a good reason.
jk @ 64
Yes, I have been saying over and over, haven’t I? Maybe the gig is just to wait on the subtitle, and if I get much surer of the NIE stuff, then we can just use, “How Dick Cheney Outed the Spy Who Could Prove He Lied Us Into War.”
I agree. I don’t think the idea of a longer subtitle is a bad idea either – to give the less informed some idea what the book is about. Subtitles also seem very fashionable these days.
The thing that bothers me most about the whole incident is the lack of resolution. Everyone was “outraged” that her identity was revealed. The President threatened to fire anyone involved. But now we get to the point, seems like everyone knows what happen and the only person being charged with a crime is Libby. So what did happen? Was it not wrong to discuss a convert CIA agent working on the most sensitive matter to the country (WMD) all while exposing the yes the wife of our diplomate in your country could be spying on YOU. Where is the justice.
Is there a PO Box where I can send a check? I don’t do credit cards :-}
Also – #38, please don’t call him “Darth” Cheney;
Vader was redeemed at the end. Not a chance in hell that’ll ever happen to Cheney. (Maybe “Adolf” Cheney?) That creep veep is evil and rotten through and through.
I gave a hundred bucks to become a “silent publisher” of 16 Words because this book needs to be written and I can’t write it.
I came to Firedoglake for the Plame coverage. I admit, I’ve never had any respect for George W. Bush and Company, but even I couldn’t believe they would actually out a CIA agent. For any reason. There had to be an explanation that didn’t lead to treason.
I stayed because the coverage was — and is — based on facts and reasoned analyses, challenged by a group of smart, educated people who want to know what really happened. The end result is a body of information that stands up to the test. I believe 16 Words will be a book people can refer to for the truth. If I can be a part of the effort to make that happen, how can I not?
windje @ 68
I like it, windje.
But can we use Dick instead? That’s the one we’re going after eventually.
“Lies and War: The Inside Story Of How The Bush Administration Betrayed a CIA Agent and a Nation”
OT– Bruce Fein just said that most recently people who voted against Lieberliar and for Ned Lamont were called unpatriotic … he is on fire!!! I am listening to this while cooking and thank goodness for Maxine Waters, Bill Delahunt, and Sheila Jackson Lee.
immanentize says:
September 12th, 2006 at 2:43 pm
I like it better without ‘The’, and that subtitle rocks!
Thanks for taking on this project.
I came to FDL because the Boston Globe and
other MSM were not even covering the story…
It is an enormous story with many layers
of intrigue and abuses of power…
This book will inform and tell the REAL story
of what went on to sell the war and smear good
folks. I grew up with Watergate and felt
that Nixon was lying and then the tapes proved the case. I know Bush, Cheney and Rove were the masterminds of this attempt to hijack our country… but…
They are so cunning, I hope Fitzy will prevail since he believes in the TRUTH.
I am so so sick of being lied to that Canada
seems like an option…
We must win this one, our freedom is at stack…
Thanks again,
Jack
I was online the night that the Kaloogian(sp?) photo fraud was discovered. It was such a rush to be even the tiniest part of that.
To oversimplify, the blogosphere brings EVERY point of view and skill to bear. It’s distributed intelligence, where many of the sources are experts in their own fields.
First off, it matters because the Plame incident perfectly encapsulates what is wrong with this administration. They are fundamentally un-American, because they will not tolerate dissent. They will attack anyone who challenges them; and they don’t just attack the message, they try to *destroy* the messenger.
emptywheel @ 76
Hope that the Dick will be dicked springs eternal, but I’ll believe it when I see it happen – he’s pretty slick at keeping his fingerprints off the doorknobs.
or “Lies and War: The Inside Story Of How Scooter Libby Betrayed a CIA Agent and a Nation”
P J Evans @ 79
Yeah, imm. I love the subtitle too. Bigger than a breadbox but smaller than an SUV. No downside in also having a catchy subtitle, like the one you suggest…
If you put Scooter Libby in the damn title, it is going to make it much, much tougher to pardon him. Put Scooter in the title. Make him the focus. Prevent the pardon.
There’s always one in every crowd. :)
Marcy, if anyone can do it, it’s you and Jen, so I’m 100% confident that 16 Words will be 100% terrific — and my god, what a service to the public!
The theme of absolutely over-the-top public disservice is what makes this story so compelling to me, and of course so infuriating. That the minions of Public Servant No. 1 have tried this long and this hard to set themselves above the law — and so nearly succeeded — makes them greater villains than I ever dreamed possible, especially after Nixon.
But their arrogance set up their downfall, and I believe that the Plame case — whatever course it takes after January 16 — will soon become recognized as the point at which the law began to catch up with them. As the facts of their ineptitude burst through into daylight with Katrina, the facts of their criminality burst through with Plame.
They will go down. And long after they have, the book you’re pulling into shape now will serve as an invaluable landmark for historians.
I’ve been delighted to be an onlooker as you, Jane, Christy, lhp, Mary, imm, and others whose incredible pro bono diligence I’ve witnessed here and at TNH have teased out the story to this point.
When the P.O. box goes up, I’ll be even more delighted to enlist more directly in your effort!
Jenny from the Blog @ 87
Sing with me, Jftb:
“Every party has its pooper, that’s why we invited you –”
please, no LieberChow for trolls !
immanentize @ 89
heehee! When I first started working, I’d come home ranting to my dad about some obnoxious person in the office and he’d say: “Jenny (not really), there’s always gonna be one SOB, wherever you go.” Smart guy, my dad.
okay, *ilson. I was just leaving anyway… :)
No doubt it’s been mentioned, but the Jeff Gannon story came from the blogs.
Hey Marcy — did you get this email today?
Emphasis mine…Um…do you know anybody in Levin’s office?
To reiterate, it would be so powerful to put Scooter square in the middle of the title. If he is to be the firewall, he must be made to realize that he will have to act as such without the benefit of a pardon. Making him the focus of the title will get his name out in the national consciousness. If this book makes Scooter the public face of treason, his odds of getting a pardon decrease. He is the lynchpin – take him out.
“Many here teach law students — future lawyers. We generally teach that the Congress makes the laws, the executive faithfully executes the laws and the Judicial branch interprets the laws. It seems that currently, there is some idea that the executive is responsible for making and interpreting the laws, not just executing the laws as enacted by Congress and interpreted by the courts. How does the FBI see its role in this question of the source of law in this country? As an executive agency, do feel bound by the executive alone, or do you currently follow the congressional text/judicial interpretation structure?”
Never got answered.
imm, bravo on your question — perfectly phrased, I’d say. And that it “never got answered”? I’d say it did. Alas.
Marcy: a few suggestions.
(1) Be sure to include a detailed timeline of events as they unfolded, beginning with the runup to the SOTU speech and the 16 words.
(2) Be sure to tie the book to a blog (Next Hurrah?) where readers can check in to follow developments as they occur.
(3)Possible title: Slam Dunk This brings in the CIA involvement which is critical to the whole story. Also brings in Tenet, Plames’ uber-boss at the time.
(4)Possible subtitle: Words of Mass Deception
(4) Possible subtitle: Anatomy of Deceipt
Um…do you know anybody in Levin’s office?
No, and he didn’t send this to me (though I haven’t checked my special Senatorial spam email address. Maybe he’s just cross at me for getting so many people to call him before the Convention about supporting his buddy Holy Joe rather than his party.
But maybe you and I should go visit together? He likes you…
orangejumpsuit – agree 100% regarding the timeline. Put it right at the front so it can be referred back to, and to pique the interest of the reader…
I found FDL and TNH when I became aware of the Plame leak.
I was drawn to the story because I found it riveting.
I felt a sense of betrayal that my country had deginerated to a cesspool of politically motivated attacks on a CIA agent.
I wanted justice and I felt that the truth was being hidden away. I went on a search for truth.
Rayne @ 93
Though many of those classifications are known facts!!!
For example, they totally rewrote the story of Chalabi in N. Iraq from the 1990s, even though Bob Baer wrote a book about it already. And they classified the news that the INC defector Haideri failed a CIA lie detector test.
I mean, how pathetic is it to declassify something that 10 journalists have already covered.
One last version of the title:
“Of Lies and War: How Scooter Libby and the Bush Administration Betrayed a CIA Agent and a Nation”
OT. “Path to 9/11″ will be discussed with Jeffrey Brown on PBS Newshour tonight (12 Sep) according to Brant at Huffington Post.
Good Luck Marcie!
I think ‘16 words’ leaves something out.
“The 16 Words of Treason” Sounds better to me.
That is what I think of when it comes to PlameGate. TREASON.
Everything leading up to it, and every thing since.
OT..Pics of Jane and CHS at Clinton’s blogger conf. They look great.
I think the title should be, hmmmm, uhhh…
“Malicious Intent”
(How the White House Sold Out a CIA Agent to Even a Political Score)
I’m just brainstorming here, so bear with me.
emptywheel @ 76
*xyz @ 101
EW
I like xyz’s suggestions or variations thereupon.
OT, but what’s with the Lieberman campaign’s new “blog” The Full Monty attacking Annie Lamont?
I’m not a Kossack, but if there are any here, would a diary there with a link for donations be appropriate? Exposure to a wider sympathetic audience couldn’t hurt.
Mimikatz — yes! That is a PERFECT example of the power of the toobz, a massively parallel computing array with highly intelligent nodes working in tandem. SusanG got that story stuck in her craw, and the Kossacks went WILD on the chase, eventually giving rise to ePluribus Media.
In the software industry, many of us are familiar with Eric Raymond and his online book, The Cathedral and the Bazaar, in which he tries to explain the business model of proprietary software in contrast to the “gift economy model” of open source software. One of the key points about open source is this:
Microsoft’s WinXP SP-2 release made this very point; within 48 hours of the release of this patch, hundreds of companies had identified incompatibilities that Microsoft had not found in months (years?) during the design and subsequent release of WinXP and SP-1. Many more eyeballs were involved and found the bugs (although they could not fix them because of the proprietary model).
The internet facilitates the bazaar in the course of this investigation; where else, how else could a project attract the caliber and diversity of investigators as contributors, let alone neophytes who are merely motivated purely by curiosity and are unafraid to ask the “stupid questions” that are important to resolution? (If a project cannot solve a “stupid question”, it won’t succeed, and sometimes too much brilliance results in a project team that fails for this reason.)
The only two major flaws I can think of with an open source investigation are:
1) openness itself – the opposition sees everything going on, can predict where the investigation will go and interfere with it, depending on the level of safeguards in place; I don’t know that this is not what happened with Gannon-Guckert. (Did they circle the wagons to keep us from getting in any deeper because they could see we were too close?)
2) participants come and go like the wind, bringing and taking resources and skills with them in unpredictable fashion, unless the project has been laid out in such a way that it has backups and alternatives in place to buffer flux of talent coming and going.
to me, the key phrase for the subtitle is about “betraying a CIA Agent” as in “How Dick Cheney betrayed a CIA Agent to save his reputation”
Hi, empty. These are great questions.
When I heard that my own government revealed the identity of an undercover CIA agent, I was sure there was something horrible going on. Even with a pedestrian notion of “CIA” and “spy,” it makes you stop and think about what must have happened to cause this. I started paying attention as soon as I heard about it because I’ve never ever thought anything remotely positive about Bush or his administration, and I’ve never trusted him. I’ve also never ever supported this war, and when the details started to trickle out, I was fascinated. Why? One reason is because Joe Wilson seemed like such a smart, articulate, decent person who has served this country with honor. In other words, everything Bush is not. So I started to try and find everything I could on it, and that curiousity led me to the blogs. I wanted to understand who was involved and what was happening, and how this confluence of events was tied to the war. When eriposte started writing about Niger, I was convinced this was truly an historic event. We had all the elements of a true scandal. The more I learned about Valerie and Joe Wilson, and the more I learned about the lies leading up to the war, the more I felt outraged. When we had a chance to see who Fitz was and the integrity he brought to the situation, I began to become obsessed with finding out the truth.
All of the people involved in this case are archetypal figures. It is a classic story of wrongdoing perpetrated upon true patriots by those who have done so much to ruin our country.
I salute you, Marcy. I have read your work for a long time, and I can’t tell you how much I’m looking forward to this book. Although I’ve done my best to try and keep up with every detail in this story all over the blogosphere, there are so many complexities and nuances and legalities and dishonesty and not enough hours in a day……I need a more wholistic overview and some fresh perspective. I sincerely wish you the best with this project. We are here for you in every single way.
al-Scooter
Teddy SanFran did a diary before – It seemed to work well. Hopefully someone will put another one soon. Anyone? Buehler?
So, I was just mulling over the implications of this sort of open-source brainstorming. Does anybody do intellectual property work here? Are there any concerns over, for example, copyrighting the candidate book names so that other people won’t try to interfere?
Oh, and Marcy, make sure you grab domain names quickly when you’ve narrowed down the possible names.
Steve @ 103
Could we have a link, please?
Why does this matter to you?
It matters because I am so fed up with
1) CheneyCorp lying, over and over.
2) The so called press, with very few exceptions, just letting them get away with it, or even becoming enablers.
Thank you.
P.S. Helen Thomas is one of the few exceptions. What she does is what they all ought to be doing. Damned lapdogs.
*ilson? Calling *ilson!
Sorry posted at Americablog(I am still working on links, delurking is painful)
Primordial Ooze @ 112
Give *ilson a hundred bucks and put him on the case.
*xyz #111: Good on Teddy! Another base covered.
TRex @ 114
http://i67.photobucket.com/alb…..igDawg.jpg
OK ; )
Marcy,
To me, this entire tragedy (yes, I emphatically call it a tragedy!) epitomizes the mendacity that forms the foundation of the Cheney Administration’s “ends justify means” governing philosophy as well as their actual governance itself.
A delirious and deceitful pretense of government by “rules are meant to be broken” instead of by “rule of law”!
This tragedy gives ample evidence that they truly believe that no law can restrain them.
Like believing that the victors are the only ones who write history, they ultimately believe that the rulers make the rules, and without any regard for the ruled.
The most appropriate thing I can say to bid you well in your work is: “May the Fitz be with you!”
Marcy — You know, we could try and work the local office here in Saginaw to angle for a time with Levin. Bet the office here has a LOT less going on than the main office in Detroit.
Wonder if Levin would know his stuff well enough that he could tell you, Look deeper here – Not there…? Or do you think we need to ask which staffer…?
Nice find, Steve. Bloggers’ picnic wif da big dog.
the President said in a press conference that Saddam Hussein “had relations with Zarqawi.”
I wish those words hadn’t jumped out so – sometimes don’t ask, don’t tell has an upside.
I’m incredibly shallow and kind of recent. I discovered FDL from a piece Jane did at Huffpo sometime last fall, after Katrina but before Feingold put together his Patriot Act filibuster (was that December?). I wasn’t sure what a blog was and had just discovered Huffpo. Jane’s piece was really good (which is why I clicked) the name fascinating, and the pictures and graphics with the threads were incredible. I loved how conversations carried around and jumped back and forth too. It was really appealing to have something discussed with some depth and not just “balanced prattle”
Plame is really really really interesting to me; but I’m not sure I have it in the same “important” category as most here. Not having been with the site from the early reports, I don’t have the same “vesting” that develops over time and with effort. I also just don’t have a good finger on the pulse for what people will and won’t react to (never dreamed that the Cheney shooting would be a big deal)
The Plame story is fascinating and a part of that is fact that probably some things won’t come out – the actual consequences of the Plame leak, for example. You challenge yourself some with how the “what ifs” might or might not affect how you view the outcomes.
I like The 16 Words but I think it is a bit insider. I guess “LIES: Untruths and Consequences in the Bush White House” is my pipe dream. Here’s hoping Waas can slip you some stuff – surely someone, somewhere, wants to spill a little bit more about the missing emails?
TRex @ 113
There’s this.
My answers to ew’s questions:
1. The scoops – you got the big ones I think, but there have been dozens of smaller scoops driven by the fact that we have time to actually read the source material (esp. court documents) that most journalist don’t have time for.
2. Special contributions – I think the most important thing to emphasize is focus. The Washington press corps (with the notable exception of Murray Waas) has not been able to focus on this story, even the ones writing books about it. Because they are slaves to the news cycle, they have ceded the editorial function (i.e. what gets published) to their anonymous sources. Every story in the traditional press seems to be written by and for people who have almost no recollection of what has already been said about the case.
3. Why this is important – I’ve believed from the beginning that this story is the lever by which we can start to destroy the edifice of evil erected by these miscreants. It puts the lie to their propaganda. Telling stories is the way to change the world. This story has all the basic elements that people understand (power, revenge, even hubris). The fact that the heros (Joe and Valerie Wilson) and villain (Cheney) look their parts makes it even better.
*ilson46201 @ 109
Betrayal is important. Everyone understands betrayal. Definitely should be in the title.
But I can’t emphasize enough that Scooter should be mentioned in the title.
Scooter is their firewall, and it is his trial that is coming up. He is the only one under indictment and the only one who is relying on a possible pardon.
Putting Scooter’s name in the title does serious damage to his hopes for a pardon (which is perhaps the main goal of this whole project) and also it ties the book in with the ongoing trial – which is good for marketing!
Putting Scooter’s name in the title also ensures that even those who do not read the book will come to think of betrayal when they think of Scooter Libby. This is not only factually correct, it is exactly the message that we need to convey to the largest possible audience.
How about:
Sixteen Words
The Outing of a Spy
1,261 dayz and the killin’ goez on and on and…
“None Dare Call It Treason” is a great title (oh the irony) but it’s been taken…so how about “Treason: Sixteen Words and the Death of American Democracy”?
KEEP THE FAITH AND YOU GO GIRL!!!
OT.. Hopefully we will get a report from one or both of the ladies tonight.
Emptywheel!!
You all amaze me with your tireless efforts to clarify the Plame case. Thanks.
My title suggestion would be
By Any Means Necessary.
Good luck with the book.
My fond hope for the book is photographs to go with the names, and lots of them. Maybe Swopa could be a consultant on that front? I’ve really enjoyed the well-chosen photos of the key players that have been displayed at Needlenose. And has anyone ever seen a photograph of Fred Fleitz, for example? How about Doug Feith, or David Wurmser, etc., etc. Get this people out of the shadows and onto the record where they belong. It helps to connect and remember the players when you have a visual memory to go with their name (at least it does for me).
I like orangejumpsuit’s “Words of Mass Deception.” Maybe with a subtitle like ‘Sixteen Words and The Ambassador and His CIA Wife Who Called Their Bluff and Paid The Price.’ [Very roughly - it seems as though the Wilsons (and ‘bloggers’/'blogs’?) should show up in the title somewhere.]
Here’s my title idea:
Hottie
How an undercover babe-alicious spy was outed, probably leading to people’s deaths
Oh Tommy! gasp (faints dead away!)
Because of Iran Contra and Ollie North. Because of Bush Sr’s ‘Thoousand Points of Light.’ Because Bush Sr did not know the price for a gallon of milk. Because of Reagan’s ‘I don’t recall.’ Because of the DNA and the dress. Because were there empty pizza boxes in the West Wing, and if so, does that mean a lack of disciplne? Because the adults had come to restore dignity to the White House. Because Ari Fleischer behaved like a purile, pimple-faced squeeze doll. Because I think Cheney’s actually stupid and mean. Because the narrative was written by the wrong hand. Tough-talkin’ Texan? Sissy wind surfer? Left wing of the left wing of the left wing to allow Americans to marry martians? Because of the whisper campaigns. Because the silver foot in his mouth stayed put in Texas, never to see VietNam. What part of ‘can’t produce the evidence’ don’t you understand? Because ‘is’ is what it is, but ‘torture’ isn’t. Because of ‘bin Laden determined to strike America’. Because Christy’s just sayin’. Because Valerie Plame’s got a heckuva case, and looks good in a cocktail dress. Because of FITZ!
Amen.
O.K. WAY off topic….but did y’all see Christy and Jane with Mr Bill Clinton on Americablog??????? Go take a gander…
I am so jealous and can’t wait to hear their take on the meeting!
What sheila anderson said!
16 Words that Misled America Into War
And How Dick Cheney Betrayed a US Spy to Cover It Up.
The scope of betrayal is far beyond Valarie Plame.
The entire team was compromised by this disclosure.
A team centered around…WMD.
NCO’s do not grow on trees, and they cannot be replaced with a fresh crops of Yale MBAs.
They must be cultivated, groomed and protected carefully to be effective.
Of course, THIS administration felt no need for QUALIITY intelligence, just SUPPORTING intelligence. Which can be made up on the spot.
That is why this matters.
Because like so many other actions of this administration, the American people will be paying down the debt for another generation.
(If we are lucky)
jmba @
136
Here’s the group shot.
Rayne at 92, what I’d give for just one Senator to write me emails like that. Bob Graham would have — but he’s retired. Sure would make a fine replacement for Negroponte — or Rice — though, wouldn’t he?
I’d leave Scooter OUT of the subtitle, in that it makes him personally the focus, rather than the broader collection of rascals in (and out) of the Bush Administration. Irving’s the one on trial in January, but the book is aimed at the larger scandal of the whole affair. By putting Irving’s name in the title, it’s easier to say “gosh, that one bad apple . . .”
Why does this matter?
Words matter. Promises matter, like those made to intelligence officers who are undercover. Words that expose these officers can kill, if not them, then the people with whom they work.
Words matter. We elect people to offices from the proverbial dogcatcher to president, based in large part on the words they present to the public. “Here is my vision . . . here is my plan . . . here is my policy . . .” When those we elect play fast and loose with their language, the public learns to distrust the words that candidates use, and democracy itself suffers.
Words matter. When the United States was founded, the Continental Congress offered to the world an accounting of the reasons for our separation from Great Britain. When the United States was concluding its civil war, Abraham Lincoln offered to the nation a vision for healing the great wounds, “with malice toward none, with charity for all . . .” When the United States has signed treaties, from Versailles to Berlin to Geneva to Oslo, our words – our promises – have helped to shape a world of peace. And when our word can no longer be trusted, the world is a much more dangerous place.
Words matter. When President Bush included those infamous sixteen words in his state of the union address, he (and/or those who advised him) chose to ignore the warnings of the Intelligence community that these words were not just not proven, but that these words were not true. The Congress received a lie, the American people received a lie, and the world was given a lie.
Words matter. When this lie was on the verge of being revealed, the prescription from the Bush Administration was more lies, more deception, more fraud, and more damage to the institutions of democracy. That damage continues to this day.
Words matter. This book, as it tries to map the course of this scandal, separates truth from speculation from outright fiction. Where the scandal started is a judgment call, but where it became public and obvious is easy: it started with sixteen words.
Sixteen well-chosen, intentionally included, carefully crafted, and demonstratably false words, known to be such at the time they were uttered by President Bush in his state of the Union Address. Sixteen words.
Words matter.
Thanks for the pic “twolf1″. BLOGGERS RULE!!!
Well said, Peterr.
Reeeeowwwww….geez TRex remind me not to send any post-baby pics your way :)
I only have a fuzzy recollection of how I ended up here (I’m pretty sure I came over from The Next Hurrah, actually.) It was definitely because of the Plame case. I think I had a sense, even at the beginning, that this could be this administration’s Watergate, and wanted to understand it through and through. It matters to me because I care deeply about this country and the ideals it’s supposed to stand for, and wrongdoing that undermines our system of government cannot be allowed to stand.
Some of the special features that make the blogosphere well-suited to this kind of work are:
- Direct application of expertise. Meaning that someone like Christy or yourself can give us the benefit of your knowledge without having to first work your way up in a second career as a feature writer, or be filtered through an established journalist.
- Searchable institutional memory. Both by digging back through news reports and comparing, as has often been noted, but also internally. That is, you can write about a topic when there are new developments, or when some new synthesis occurs to you, and the previous posts are there to link to or for me to scan back through, rather than by attempting to dig up an old magazine or newspaper.
- Collaboration. Within comments on sites, across sites, through links and citations, this is one of the engines that drives this massive open-source research. (And its lack, if I may say, is why the right blogosphere for all its protestations of being “self-correcting” is as unlikely to come up with useful answers as their ideologically-driven think-tank “scholars.”) For those of us lacking either the time or skill to write at length, one of the joys of being part of this is the possibility of turning up that one nugget of information, that one analytic connection that no one else has noticed.
sheila anderson has it okay, but I’d leave out the price of a gallon of milk. Lots of guys never go in a market to find out, and he didn’t have to, not while he was VP and not while he was Pres. (That’s why scanners were a surprise. That’s why delivered pizza was a novelty. Sheltered life, for years.)
jmba–yowsa!!
Cheney’s Little Dick: The Scooter Libby Story
-GSD
I first became really interested back in Jan 2005 when SusanG over on Kos asked if anyone else was interested in finding out more about why a reporter from a no name news organization like Talon News had been questioned about the Plame leak. I guess I must have known something about what was going on because I had been reading Kos since the summer of ‘04.
So much sprang from that one question.
I was appalled by the reality of Gannon’s journalism credentials: a weekend course at The Leadership Institute, an organization set up to get conservatives into the media across the land.
I was shocked by his real job. What sort of message were the powers that be who set him up as “Chief White House Correspondent” for Talon News sending out and to whom?
I was thrilled the first time Joe Wilson posted a response that acknowledged the efforts of us all to follow this story.
It gave me chills when he posted on the Dean book thread here, that without us (bloggers), he and his wife would “have been destroyed” by the Administration.
I came to Firedoglake looking for more Plame updates. Watching you and the rest at Ykos on Cspan on my computer made me feel like I was watching history in action.
You make me feel proud to be in some small way associated with all of this.
I hate it when my thought bubble publishes itself….
TRex @ 148
man oh man oh man…
-ck- @ 3
Amen.
Okay, As a regular, I am so embarassed to be asking this question that I am not even going to post under my “real” name. I really can’t remember the 16 words, tho 4 must be weapons of mass destruction. They were exactly?
Why does this matter to you? Particularly if you first came to FDL because of Jane’s and Christy’s Plame coverage (or TNH because of my own Plame obsessions), what was it about the story that you thought was so compelling?
The timeline brought me to TNH, and you actually communicated with your readers
then I was amazed at the conversations at FDL
As I read EVERYTHING in the WaPo and NYT during the buildup to the invasion every fiber of me screamed that the voices of reason were relegated to back pages and not heard in tv coverage… I was outraged that petty but powerful people were trying to establish shadow governments, snuff real heroes, the conflict at State, the conflict at CIA, the well spoken ambassador being targeted…
I was seeing no justice…
then there were a few flickers… Ashcroft stood down… Fitzgerald was not intimidated… the US did not roll into Iran ninety days after the fall of Bagdad…
Those tiny cracks gave me hope… and when I found the blogs with an entire community who were also looking for justice, that hope started growing.
As your book grows, it shines a light into the dark history of the build up to the Iraq invasion.
What I find compelling about the story is that the neocon abuse of power was not hidden. They tried, but there are enough good guys watching and comparing notes that you’ll get the full story out soon.
Your book matters to me because it gives me hope.
Just to add to suggestions above:
(main) The Sixteen Words of Mass Deception
(subtitle) And the Ambassador Who Knew Too Much
I have seen your fine writing elsewhere, notably on BopNews.Com from time to time, and so I’m sure you’ll do a great job with this project.
What I am concerned about are various aids to help make the book more accessible and usable.
For example, is there some way to summarize the whole thing graphically in a few pages, for example in a timeline. A verbal, executive summary, perhaps the opening chapter would be helpful. Also, some sort of alphabetized biography for each of the people named in the book.
All of these aids will make your work much more usable and accessible. I hope you can find people who are competent at this sort of “information design” and can add it to complement and amplify the prose of your work. Good luck!
I can’t remember verbatim…I am sure someone will…But basically Sadaam has sought to secure uranium from Africa.
mmmmmm… yellow cake…..
someone @ 154
From memory: Great Britain has learned that Saddam Hussein recently tried to obtain uranium from Africa. Only 14 words. Oh well
Marcy,
Other’s have covered the 1, 2, 3 questions well.
My input, for whatever it’s worth, is: think about your “voice” as you write, and perhaps have an imaginary reader in mind. If your intelligent but uninformed second cousin sat you down after Sunday brunch and asked, “So, Emptywheel, what’s all this Plame brouhaha?” how would you tell your story?
2 more: “…large quantities…”
someone @ 154
“the British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa,”
I think between Sheila Anderson and Peterr – you have an intro.
I don’t know if there’s any chance you’ll get a shot at talking with the Wilsons’ atty -but if so, it would be interesting to hear his take on what you call a Presidential directive to leak cherrypicked info to a handpicked reporter, off the record.
Declassification? ;)
someone @ 154
The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.
Oh, yeah, who could forget the classic drunk’s careful diction of “quan-ti-ties.”
Peterr – I’m sorry, but you are wrong. Scooter should rightfully be the focus of the title. Putting his name there serves many complementary purposes:
1. Scooter is the one on trial, he is the one up for a pardon, and he is the one that the whole gang is relying on to act as a firewall. Putting Scooter’s name on the title serves to associate his name with betrayal, treason. If Bush considers pardoning Scooter, he’ll be forced to confront the fact that normal citizens across the country will be saying to themselves, “Scooter Libby? Isn’t he that guy who betrayed a CIA agent? Why would Bush pardon someone who did that?” Scooter in the title makes it politically harder to pardon Scooter, which is a primary goal of this book.
2. Having Scooter in the title doesn’t mean the book has to be all about Scooter. By no means. The book is what it is. And Scooter will be a big part of it. Why not mention him on the cover for the other reasons I mention here? Anyone who opens the book will realize that the whole administration is involved as well. And by making it harder to pardon Scooter, the book’s title could quite possibly allow the trial to go forward, thus even further exposing various members of the administration on the witness stand. This would be huge. And it would be done so by focusing the title squarely on the lynchpin – Libby.
3. Marketing. When the trial gets underway, Scooter’s name will be all over the news. People will want to know more. A book with Scooter in the title will attract immediate interest from anyone who watches TV.
4. One bad apple? Well, if that is the case, then why should Bush pardon him. If we spell out on the cover that Scooter betrayed a CIA agent, then if Bush pardons him, then the taint of this crime will extend to Bush as well. The goal, again, is to prevent a pardon. And if you need the administration in the title, why not say “Of Lies and War: How Scooter Libby and the Bush Administration Betrayed A CIA Agent an the Nation.”
To sum up:
Preventing Scooter’s pardon is how the truth comes out – either through his trial itself or through his cooperation. Putting Scooter’s name in the title puts the treason spotlight squarely on Scooter and draws in readers without requiring any changes in the text of the book itself.
GSD @
149
With one more subtitle? “16 centimeters”
Who’s the dark headed woman right in front of Bill’s dick?
For a title:
“TREASON” (with footnotes)
Ode to emptywheel:
an answer in three parts
sorry, I don’t pay much attention to who was “FIRST” with a scoop. I have been amazed at how the story has developed thru discussions on DKOS, TNH, and FDL. In particular I’ve been a big fan of the discussions between you (ew) and pollyusa. I’ve learned a lot from viewing those lenghty exchanges
emptywheel’s ability to distill this criminal conspiricy into a straight narative, Christy’s ability to provide accurate legal opinions in the midst of of shitstorm of spin, and pollyusa’s ability to pull just about ANY small detail or article out of a hat on request (and often without any specific request) are the three best contributions that the blogosphere has to offer
the blogosphere is an important part of the chorus that has kept this story in the news
I once was afraid of the innertubes. I’m an information junky, so the innernets are like crack to me. I avoided the lure until this nitwit presnit attacked Iraq. As I sat and watched Baghdad’s morning commute dodging Bradley fighting vehicles in March of 2003, I ventured into the tubes.
By July if 2003 I was thuroughly hooked on the tubes. The Plame Conspiricy was my first true innertubes bender. I was there in the tubes at the beginning. One of my main suppliers, DailyKOS, had a powerful voice that fed my Plame addiction. I followed that voice when it moved to another blog. And that voice led me to other voices that also fed my addiction.
An offhand conversation at DKos between Jane and some unknown fellow addict led me to FDL, where a second voice began feeding my addiction for legal knowledge of criminal conspiricies
there are several other news stories which I have been constantly following for years, (Tamil Tigers, Nepalese Moaists, etc) but most of those stories predate my time in the tubes. The Plame Conspiricy is the first wholly innernets story I have been involved in. I had once become used to being a day or two ahead of the local newspaper. Thanks to the innertubes, I’m weeks ahead of the local paper.
Having the ability to predict the news comes at a price. At the hight of my addiction I spent 18 to 20 hours a day in front of a glowing screen. Lately I have been in a recovery program that only allows 4 hours a day on the innertubes
since my 4 hours are up, I’ll leave people to guess the identity of the powerful voice from DKOS that fed my addiction, led me to TNH, and allowed me to understand exactly how scooter libby and karl rove committed treason
someone @ 154
op99 @ 167
I just watched that damn SOTU address last night. I cringed every time he said nu-qew-ler.
And after I watched it, I watched Patrick Fitzgerald’s press conference, from start to finish.
There’s an exercise in contrast for you.
While I can’t prove this, call this a Texas hunch:
Cheney’s agenda in smearing Joe and Valerie has something to do with Halliburton selling nuke technology to Iran…..however….Cheney over shot, and threw the snowball that started the avalanche.
This was mentioned by 73rd Virgin in a comment in a piece I wrote, and I think it is a nice bit of dot connecting.
emptywheel @ 174
Except for the baseball analogies?
emptywheel, you have a stomach of steel…
but at least you gave yourself a very, very nice dessert afterwards. ;)
pow wow’s request for photos is excellent, and I’ll emend it a bit by extension.
In Francine du Plessix Gray’s Them, the wealth of photos of her famous-across-three-continents-and-two-centuries family and friends — each of those photos falls on or very near the exact page where the corresponding new character or place is introduced, rather than in a few photo sections sprinkled throughout a 499-page book.
Maybe that’s something only big houses such as Penguin can pull off. But if it’s really just a matter of improved technology available to all publishing by now, I certainly recommend it!
freepatriot #172:
To the trio of contributors you’ve covered so well, I’d add Jane’s sense of narrative. When I first came to FDL (IIRC via TPM and Eschaton links), one of the things that struck me was the synergy between Christy’s legal analyses and Jane’s views of the zeigeist (for lack of a better term). So there was a combination of What’s Really Happening in and out of court and What It Means Politically. Add in the community, and it’s kinda hard to get any work done.
The skills of the blogosphere? In the words of Annie (Susan Sarandon) from Bull Durham, “Oh my . . .”
One gift of FDL and other blogs is the vast array of people that come here and share their knowledge, their backgrounds, and their ways of understanding. When a Fitz filing is posted, the lawyers see certain things, and those who work or have worked in executive branch offices see other things. DC folks, knowing the local culture of DC, will notice little details that SF folks might miss. SF folks, having perhaps a better sense of the big picture, might see nuances of behavior that DC folks will overlook. The sheer number of eyes and the various ways in which they focus is incredible.
Another gift of the blogosphere is the ability to focus for more than 24 or 48 hours. Most news media has become obsessed with “what’s happening now” or “breaking news” or “just in to the Situation Room” but has lost the ability or desire to follow a long story. Individual reporters may want to do so, but the institutions that employ them appear all too often to be all too impatient. “If you can’t get the story by Friday, forget it and move on.” The blogs will follow a story as long as the blogs are interested in it, and because $$ is much less of an issue in most cases, there is no pressure NOT to follow the story as deep and as far as it goes.
The blogosphere is also interested in more than just missing white women. Enough said on that.
Scoops for the blogosphere . . . picking apart the whole Disney mess before it aired this last weekend would never have happened without the blogs. Finding the scraps of video or people who had seen it, stitching together the backstory of its production, getting the attention of the main victims of the fraud (Albright, Berger, Clinton, American Airlines, etc.), getting in touch with Scholastic and the various local ABC stations to stop their spinning . . . Without the blogs, all this might have happened after the show aired; with the blogs at work, incredible amounts of detective work and advocacy was done in a very, very short period of time.
What are the scoops the blogosphere has gotten before the mainstream media…
Ahem.
First to note the “I didn’t know it was classified” defense.
First to speculate that Judith Miller was a participant rather than a recipient of the Plame leak (three weeks ahead of Arianna H.).
Most of my most important firsts. though, are things even the rest of the Plameosphere still hasn’t caught up with. :-)
For a summary, see: Part 1 (June 2003 to Rove’s chat with Cooper), Part 2 (Rove-Cooper to the 1×2×6 leaks)
Um, “Yellowcake and the Plameout” Nope.
“The outing…” Nope.
Anyway, I think you should use your internal outline derived from all of the in-the-weeds work to guide the arc of the narrative.
As to how I (we, actually, my wife and I have followed a similar path to FDL) first found FDL, I think I started by stumbling across a few uninteresting blogs, then found Huffpo, and went to all the links on her blogroll. When I found FDL it was like a breath of fresh air, with thoughtful, well researched, logical and sometimes passionate narrative. Then there are all the comics and punsters that break up the tension. And the stories of personal lives brings a depth that few other blogs have.
tommy yum @ 176
Bush didn’t use any baseball analogies in that. Just shot his jaw out and glared ominously.
Actually, I’d love someone more adept at video than me to trace the time when he started his glance sideways shifty look, then turn your head in that direction, because I now suspect it started with that “performance.” It’s the same way you learn to turn your head in ballet. But you lead with the eyes. Very very creepy.
I wonder if the Domenech story – broken by blogs – isn’t one that would set you up well going in? It highlights how little fact checking and critical reasoning is employed these days, at even a paper like WaPo.
*******
Libby, Leaks and Lies.
Apprentice to the Leaker-in-Chief: How a leaky White House endangered a secret CIA program tracking weapons of mass destruction.
PLANTED: How the Libby Leak Investigation Proves You Can’t Rely On DC Journalists for the Truth About — The Libby Leak Investigation.
kemo @ 153
“Sixteen words, and whaddaya get…”
newish thread
EW @ 174 – you must have a very interesting tape collection. I pity the poor teenage house sitter hoping for porn. *g*
hey firedogs!
JeffreyW, I’m with you – except I’d use High Treason
a little concerned “16 Words”, provides the Wurlitzer with an easy out -
. . .”that’s old news, Hadley did it, already apologized, blah, blah, blah, nexxxt!”
‘Support and Defend’ or ‘Purpose of Evasion’ -something from Cheney’s Oath of Office
of course the sub title has to be all about the sheer petty and cavalier nature of what they did to Valerie and the Constitution – maybe something from the schoolyard
The Plame investigation was my wading into the political stream via FDL. I just wanted the basics with no bullshit or spin. What I found was a group of highly intelligent, passionate and straightforward group of people who never mince words where it matters. It has been very interesting watching the blogs develop into a legitimate power (and hence threat) to the status quoe. When all is said and done, the world will be quite grateful the blogs came along when they did, just in the nick of time…
Swopa @ 185
“St. Peter don’t ya call me ’cause I won’t go…”
Hey, y’all — we’re missing an essential participant in this conversation. Has anybody heard from Anne today?
BETRAYED
The Outing of Valerie Plame
have you not yet been introduced to the Millennial Lab?
lpercy @ 161
*xyz @ 168
Upon further review, I would like to revise and extend my remarks . . .
Oh, hell – it’s not the first time I’m wrong. I bow to your persuasive arguments.
I do like putting “and the Bush Administration” in there, though, to keep it broader than just Irving. Yes, he’s the one on trial officially, and he’s the one who might be angling for a pardon, but the words “unindicted co-conspirators” keep coming back to me.
Irving didn’t do this alone, and I get very nervous when I hear folks trying to make this scandal smaller than it is. By all means, put his name in there, but let’s be clear that he had plenty of friends helping him on this.
btw, was drawn to the story b/c I saw it as the first glimpse of soft white underbelly of these monsters – they had done something antithetical to their own memes and therefore vulnerable – finally having to pay a price for something they couldn’t wrap in the gd flag -
“Follow the Yellowcake Road”
Peterr – thanks! I really enjoyed your comments, by the way. And I didn’t mean to be rude – just got caught up in my own argument. I’m really fine with keeping “16 Words” also – just as long as Scooter Libby and Betrayal or Treason is in the subtitle.
Swopa @ 185
War.
16 WORDS
How Bush *ucked Congress and the American People
Cabalicans
Usurping democracy in 16 words
16 WORDS
and no oversight
16 Words and countless other lies
Demanding war at any cost
16 WORDS
hypnotizing the opposition
The Big Lie
In Sixteen Words
Sixteen Words and ear wax build up
Sixteen Words and blood still runs warm
Sixteen Words
unabated
Sixteen Words
Lies Murder War Intrigue Power Oil Uranium Weapons Treason President WMD’s Treasury CIA and no sex.
njr @ 192
No way man, McC the MilleniaLab is well-informed (not so bright, but still sharper than Pool Boy). Maybe my husband?
suppose a first has to be Corn’s “could this be criminal?” if he had a blog at that time… does he have a blog now?
Swopa @ 180
*xyz @ 196
I didn’t take it as rudeness at all. Just garden-variety FDL directness between friends.
But as long as we friends are just talking, I’d steer clear of “Treason” in the title. I hear/read that, and pictures of Ann Coulter and her book pop in my head like a bad jingle that will never leave.
;)
Peterr – Just wanted to say thank you for all your fine comments. I always sit a little straighter as I begin to read them. You’re no slouch, so why should I be?
Valerie Plame was flying without a net. No cover, no ‘official’ cover, so deep that we’d just say, “Sorry, she’s not one of ours,” if she came to harm in another country and inquiries were made about her.
She was working for us, on WMD. And one of our own White House people outed her.
As a member of the duck and cover generation, that floored me. I remember Bay of Pigs. I remember thinking, thank God for spies who find out stuff so we don’t have to have wars all the time.
And…one of our own people OUTED HER.
I want justice. Her work is over. A damn shame. But justice is not done yet.
I’m just now checking in and had time to read emptywheel’s post. For fear of gertting epu’d, I’m jumping in with readsing the comments and will go back to them later.
The Plame case was indeed the very thing that drove me to fdl.
When the story first broke that someone at the White House had outed a covert agent whose specialty was nuclear prolifieration and WMD, I suddenly remembered something Bush had said in the run-up to the Iraq war — something to the effect that we can’t let the world’s worst weapons fall into the hands of the world’s worst people.
Next thing you know his administration outs an agent whose job was to prevent just that.
It was in that moment that I saw Bush for what he is: a lying, scheming, soulless charlatan who doesn’t give a rat’s ass about the war on terror and is willing to sell America and Americans down the river to achieve his political ambitions.
So I came to fdl to follow the story, thinking, like Virgil Tibbs says of Endicott in the film “In the Heat of the Night,” We can bring this fat cat down.
Will Marcy at last be explaining why the ambassador went to Niger when the mines there are the property of the government of France?
I am one of those who came here because of the Plame story. I was already disgusted with this administration and its excuses for war; I was outraged that they would betray someone serving our country in such a vital way.
I agree with the statement upthread that this narrative captures everything that is wrong with this administration: its utter contempt for the Constitution, for the laws of this country, and for every principle except raw power. Its belief that the end of maintaining that power justifies any and all means. The grotesque sense of entitlement that leads them to so viciously attack anyone who opposes them. The corruption that is the very heart of this administration is perfectly exemplified by how they treated Joe and Valerie Wilson.
Scooter’s name should not be in the title, imo. His face somewhere on the front or back cover, maybe; his name mentioned in the back cover and/or inside jacket blurbs, absolutely. But the story is much bigger than Scooter, and readers can be made aware of his involvement without putting his name in the title.
16 Words: The Ultimate Betrayal of America (I like the word treason – I think that’s what it is – but there may be legal reasons not to use it. It can certainly be suggested, however. And while the betrayal Valerie experienced was certainly very personal to her, ultimately we were all betrayed.)
16 Words: War, Corruption, and the Betrayal of America
16 Words: The Lie that Changed the World
Some variation thereon.
how about something snarky like
Unintended Consequences ?
Why was this story so compelling?
Because Valerie Plame Wilson was betrayed by her own government. And from the outset, it seemed like it was purely for political spite.
My interest in this case was/is personal. My father, mother, sister and uncle all worked for the CIA. If it could happen to Mrs. Wilson, it could happen to anyone. No one is safe from the criminal actions of the Bush-Cheney administration. When this story broke, I was (and continue to be) appalled. In a time when the U.S. is having difficulty recruting people to work in clandestine services, it is especially appalling.
It is the stuff of totalitarian regimes, not the United States of America.
16 Words: The Lie that Changed the World
Excellent, that’s the book I buy.
Marcy, release date?
My instinct is to definitely NOT put Libby’s name anywhere in the title or subtitle — that would be a gift to BushCO and diminish the power of the whole project.
The essence of the story is not about bit players like Scooter Libby.
kemo @ 210
Yeppers. I LOVE THAT.
Swopa @ 185
A pile of dead people and a mountain of debt …
More food for thought (why not tie it to the real perpetrator?)
The True Story Behind Bush’s 16-Word Lie
kemo @ 209
If all goes well, sometime just before January 16.
How aboout Sixteen Words: The Lie That Lost Two Wars?
Thanks for the nod, Mary and meta. I posted my riff in a total rage, which is something I normally don’t do, Couldn’t help myself. I agree with PJ Evans…about the milk. I was not thinking of helping out with the book when I posted, as much as I wanted to articulate my particular beef of the moment.
I like 16 Words of Mass Deception, but think it won’t win because it probably doesn’t sound adult enough.
Signed,
total adolescent (sometimes) ;)
Click the pics
title suggestion:
“Protecting the Lie”
How a covert officer of the CIA was betrayed by the Bush White House
Wilson spoke truth to power about intelligence manipulations that lead us into Iraq.
Our top goverment employees (whom we pay) most likely orchestrated a campaign to discredit Wilson for blatant political reasons, rather than criticise him in an honest and legitimate fashion, and used the media in a dishonest way toward this endeavor.
Bush promised to “get to the bottom” of this leak and fire anyone responsible, but hired a lawyer and hid behind him when he testified to Fitgerald.
Libby, after indictment, was given a cush neo-com welfare postion and a multi-million dollar defense fund.
The Wilson’s have nothing to fight back with except their government service retirement benefits and savings.
It is so unfair.
He was already there.
http://www.ThankYouValerie.com
Newsflash: Armitage’s sizable butt being sued by the Wilsons.
A to #3: (it’s a bit wordy)
We’re not a warmongering people. We exists as a nation of internationals, and are still very much an historical experiment. We understand our destructive capacity, and therefore do not regard war lightly.
Deep in our guts we knew the neocons wanted war with Iraq, an historical fact. But we were not sure to what lengths they would go to do it. We presumed some moral and professional bar, below which we wanted to believe they would never stoop. We knew for example about the setup of the OSP under Feith, which could hypothetically allow them to ‘mainline’ whatever intel nuggets, however erroneous, they wanted arriving back at the CIA. Basically, we witnessed them installing their capability to hijack intel, but in what way and for what ultimate purpose at the time we could only surmise.
Our worst fears were answered when the Niger document was established a forgery. Not ‘bad intel’: a forgery. Someone wanted that document to exist badly, so much so that they created it. Who it was remains a secret.
Wilson bravely served as messenger to the public’s need for the truth, he risked a lot, and we applauded his courage. So somebody went after the messenger’s wife. The messenger’s WIFE.
How low would they willingly go? As a blogger once replied; how deep is Hell?
Illegal, immoral, cowardly, profoundly un-American; in a war that was supposed to have a good guy, on which moral side this event put our leaders became a dark and serious question. As events would transpire, the liberal left occasionally would find itself in the awkward position of verifying claims made by the CIA itself, against the White House. What historian ever saw that coming? What planet had we all been unwittingly beamed down onto?
Meanwhile, journalism could no longer serve its vetting function. Enmired in government manipulation and corporate motives, its investigative responsibilities atrophied. Journalism today typically relegates to hovering over the AP newswire machine and regurgitating whatever prints out, none of which involves analysis.
The only thing clear was that the mainstream public should no longer trust somebody powerful in the direction of the White House, nor the mainstream media by proxy.
Plamegate became an event that required members of the internet community to find and share information on their own. It was not Woodward & Bernstein’s Watergate. It was (and remains) in many ways more dangerous, with no safety nets or any prospect of institutional protections. You had to use the tools at your disposal to create a new form of news analysis and discourse, complete with its own set of checks and balances, in order to conduct proper investgative research, and you did it. It’s not hyperbole to say Plamegate was probably your finest hour.
And, if no one else said this before, the kicker would be that you put out the book with a companion CD that allows you to click on all the links…..
Emptywheel — I don’t know exactly how I found firedoglake. I do know that in my frustration with Sunday news programs and other media that I began to search for more indepth news and facts on my own. I stayed at firedoglake, my blog home or townhall, because of the community support and leadership of Christy and Jane. I found answers to my questions about Valerie Plame and many other related topics supported by linked facts and supporting documents.
I like the picture posted above and your proposed title 16 Words. Your work is excellent and I am a grateful American citizen.
Why does this story matter to me? For 17 years I developed classified satellite systems for the govt (DoD, NSA, etc.). This work required an extensive background investigation (EBI), spanning 15 years of my life (grade school to grad school). The FBI even spoke to my grandmother in Western Ireland, and then had me sit through a 4 hour polygraph test to talk about their findings, with follow-up strap-in tests every five years. Let Libby try that.
This is a story about the misuse of classified information to dupe this country into war. The highest crime a president can commit.
Personally, what does it mean to me? Let me put it this way: I took my work seriously, I thought it was important. Would I ever work for this government again? Never.
I just put in my donation. Missed the first post about the book. But I’m very excited to know it will be coming.
Why do I care? From the very beginning the Plame story infuriated me. It was everything, all rolled into one story, that I think is WRONG about this administration. I am still angry every time I think about it.
Yes, I was in the group that first came to FDL because of that story. And of course, I’ve stayed and stayed.
Way to go Emptywheel!! You Go! Get the book written. We here will see that there is enough money to get it out there. If it is anything like what you write on your blog, it will be great.
You are proof that one person can make a difference. Get that book out there and make the cost of a pardon from the Boy King expensive.
Actually, I don’t doubt that there will be a pardon. But hopefully it will be right before he goes out of office.
Suggestion for preface:
“Even though I’m a tranquil guy now at this stage of my life, I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view, the most insidious of traitors.”
– George Herbert Walker Bush, 1999
Father also said going into bahgdad would be a quagmire.
EW:
You need a co-author: someone who has done yeoman’s work on the Niger forgeries. I believe it was Duncan Black, but it may be somebody else, who did an UNBELIEVABLE work of great length. Knit Libby, Niger and you have a story of high drama!
sheila anderson @ 135
Sheila Anderson speaks for me
Suggestion for title:
Most insidious of traitors.
Like Vincent Bugliosi did in Helter Skelter, the case is not complete until the motive is determined – in Libby’s case, various motives for Libby to lie to investigators have been hypothesized, such as covering up for Cheney, or saving his own ass from a charge of exposing a covert agent. Libby’s defense is he just forgot about his conversations about Valerie Plame because of Iraq and the the 2004 re-election campaign. But that’s the whole point. It was all about re-election. Joe Wilson’s op ed’s were a direct challenge to the very foundation of their re-election strategy: the U.S. is a country at war, and it is unwise to change horses in the middle of a war. The 2004 election didn’t cause Libby to forget about his conversation with Matt Cooper; the 2004 campaign was the very reason for this conversation. By obstructing Fitzgerald’s inquiry, Libby was able to delay disclosure of Bush/Cheney’s involvement long enough for the 04 elections to take place.
You ever notice how expendable “freinds” and compromised members of the Bush/Cheney Crime Syndicate willingly toss themselves under the bus to save their paymaster (Dick Cheney) whenever the poop starts sticking? First we witnessed Harry Whittington’s groveling public apology for throwing his face in front of Double-barrel Dick’s Quail killer at precisely the wrong time. Now we see veteran Dick Armitage heroicly tossing himself on Dick’s dull sword of disgrace for “accidentally”, single-handedly, outing Val Wilson. Dick Cheney sure likes his weapons.
Vic Blazier, 2003 Operation Iraqi Oil Veteran
I myself don’t recall how I discovered FDL, it was probably a link from somewhere else (HP, C&L). I think it was last February. I got a reliable internet connection at home late last year (sorry, I live in Timbuktu) and accidentally discovered blogs via MSM.
I have always had an interest in the Plame case via hardcopy MSM (Time, Newsweek, VF went I can get it).
What happened to me was I was browsing FDL for the first or second time, and I saw this thing called a Site Meter, so I clicked it out of curiosity. I clicked the yearly graph and saw the dramatic rise in hits from August 05 to October 05. It was amazing to me, so I wanted to investigate that story. It was mostly due to Plame coverage, including the addition of ReddHeed as a contributor (originally a commentator). Of course, this lead me to many other sites. The Plame story was political porn, as Jane famously said, and since then this site has progessed and evolved way, way beyond that initial start.
Back to Plame. This case was the start of the end of the hubris, lies, corruption and all the other evils of this adminsitration.
This is great. I can’t wait for this book.
Emptywheel -
Would you consider any submissions I have for the artwork for the book? I would love to work with you.
I can bring any idea you have to life or you could let my devilish creativity run rampant.
Let me know!
dartmonk at comcast.com
-Monk
Please include the tidbit that this woman’s name is Valerie Wilson. Not Valerie Plame. If it seems minutiae, it’s not, or at least this is significant minutiae.
I don’t have citations but Joseph Wilson has stated this several times.
She didn’t keep her name, she became Valerie Wilson at marriage. Not progressive perhaps but something many women still do (and even some men in fact).
This renders such claims as “we didn’t use her name” or “you can find her name via a book” even more ridiculous and meaningless than they already were.
When someone says “Joe Wilson’s wife” this is saying “Mrs. Wilson” which is, in fact, her name. This renders all discussion and ink wasted on the following steps, whether someone consulted a book, or asked around, or any other method, to connect this to someone named Plame — utterly meaingless, in one swoop.
The name Plame was a convienience for reporters, innocently enough perhaps, but it’s no more her name than Mrs. Ricardo’s was Lucille McGillicutty.
The more we all continue to use a maiden name for someone who doesn’t use it herself, the more it muddies things, IMO.
Thanks,
Fred
‘Fair Game”, title recommendation (although I like Sixteen Words).
kemo @
227
kemo
Where in W Ireland?
“Me faather-in-law’s from Tuam.”
Fred Mertz @ 237
If it helps, I’ve been training myself off Plame in recent writing.
burningbush @
229
We could call it “The Most Insidious of Traitors.”
But unfortunately still too close to Coulter.
Betrayal: sixteen words that changed the world.
The Anatomy of a Betrayal
The sixteen words that lied us into war.
Trust betrayed: the 16 words that lied us into war.
Since Libby fancies himself a writer, I think the title “From Rhyme to Treason” is fitting.
Marcy
I can’t wait to read it.
A timeline (annotated) is a must, even if it’s an appendix
Rayne @ 93
Um isn’t it illegal to classify material in order to hide wrongdoing?
Dems must take the House.
emptywheel @ 239
God rest her soul, she’s buried in County Limerick. The whole town marched in her precession.
MsAnnaNOLA — yeah. Damned straight, we need to take the House AND the Senate, and every Governorship and every Secretary of State and State AG. Every damned one, or we’ll not only not take Congress, they’ll steal the next and future elections.
EW — I forgot to add a couple things to my “Why is this important to me” litany.
Because it’s PERSONAL. My stepson served in Iraq in 2003 for a lie, a lie of such magnitude that the most senior elected and appointed officials in the country felt they needed to burn an operative and all associated assets and collateral to protect that same lie. My husband and the rest of the family worried constantly while this young man served in Iraq for a lie. The pictures my stepson brought home on leave, while they eased some of the family’s trepidations, didn’t jibe with what we new, reflecting a bankrupt country never fully recovered after Gulf War I. My stepson now has PTSD and is chronically challenged by the bureaucracy of a collapsing military support system, all because of 16 words uttered by George W. Bush.
Because the 16 words were only the tip of the deadly iceberg into which our nation has run. There’s more, and if we don’t find out how big it really is, we are well and truly sunk as a democratic nation.
emptywheel @ 240
Empty: Excellent! Glad to hear it.
PS: Family hailed from Ballinrobe, County Mayo, here. (Not me, my grandparents.)
“Wheel’s on fire, rolling down the road…”
we are currently on a new adventure in constitutional structure.—Immanentize
I’d always thought of it as a pseudo-legalistic coup, but the above way of describing our situation has the virtue of focusing the attention on a better way of finding restoration. Still, but for the exposure of Valerie Wilson I’m not sure it would have been as clear as it is, for as long as it has been, just how contemptuous of their oaths to the nation, the law, their offices, the civil servants and career military who work with and under them at frequently great sacrifice, and the true security of this country as a public good rather than as something to be divvied up among a few people in bunkers, these knaves are.
It was the clarity of outing a highly clandestine agent that got my attention: the Power and Freedom Cabal, as we might call them, really think they can just throw anyone or thing on the trash heap that they find expedient. Further information that has come out on Mrs. Wilson’s various task areas has made clear the PFC’s determination not merely to get away with past lies about the existence and nature of threats to this country, but to retain the capability of telling future ones, whatever disaster might ensue. There are many other stories that display aspects of the depth of their maleficence, but few, of the ones that we know perhaps only the callous treatment of New Orleans and the Gulf coast, better display their complete uncaring for the people of this country.
Moral clarity. The PFC and their mouthpieces are always babbling about it, but how ironic the path they have chosen to shake us into that state.
Anyway, my attention engaged, I finally went in search of news sources that took the story seriously, eventually finding FDL, DailyKos, CrooksandLiars, and NextHurrah among others (all of which I found during one lost several-day period, as I recall).
EW, thank you for the opportunity to speak, it is very gracious of you. I’ll join the others here in rooting for you progress however I can.
I keep saying: gotta have an Index.
emptywheel @ 241
This could be a most compelling first paragraph for your book. A quote of this magnitude by Poppy would set the irrefutable tone of gravity and clearly mark the treachery of outing an agent.
Title: “Scorched Earth”?
Possible subtitles:
“How the WH betrayed the nation to hide the truth”
“How the WH handles dissent”
“Treason in the name of Bush”
“How a covert agent became collateral damage in the rush to war”
I still wonder if this is *just* about Joe Wilson. It has been pointed out elsewhere that the rationales for many Rove/Cheney actions are multi-faceted. I wonder if this was also a way to eliminate hard data on the WMD status quo for both Iraq and Iran. I’ve also heard that the cover company was involved in trying to determine the “peak oil” status in Saudi Arabia.
The Plame fiasco brought me to the lake, either via TPM or Atrios. I frequent blogs because they connect the dots and query the accepted spin.
Not sure I remember any scoops other than those already mentioned and, let’s face it, that’s what MSM’s financial resources and access should provide the public. Yet the blogs are far better at recognizing the importance of a scoop than many traditional reporters and they can run with a story that intrigues them. Not burdened with the new he said/she said rules of journalism, responsible blogs are far better at analysis/context and they excel at identifying the players and possible motives, not only as operatives in the narrative but as sources of info. Google is a blogger’s friend, whereby we get Goldbar’s backstory, the inter-twined relationships of Scooter’s legal trust, and the past bias of a particular reporter. What I personally love about the lake is the legal commentary that heightens a lay person’s understanding of how to interpret the zigs and zags.
I share many of the same interests in this story with other firepups, but one aspect that particularly infuriates me is the drive-by quality of the shooting. The administration and its political appointees have proven their allegiance to power, ideology, and patronage. They evidence no love of country or the common good. The Wilsons served the country without public recognition or gratitude. Sure, the Ambassador had a shinning moment when he stared down Saddam before the first Gulf war, an example of courage and political theatre that may have slipped down the memory hole had he not decided to stand up once again for his country. Valerie Plame took a vow of silence in her service to country, seeking neither thanks nor glory; indeed, she is prohibited from defending herself against whatever outrage her own government and their media fling her way. (Let’s hope that civil suit goes forward!) Career civil servants are disposable to this gang of marauders, who actively disdain competence and rule of law. Institutional memory and analysis are respected only if they serve this administration’s purpose. Valerie Plame is the most vicious example of a career destroyed by W’s cohorts, but the devastation is widespread and will take years to repair. God willing, they will never darken the doors of government again, but neither will many honorable souls who asked only what they could do for their country.
They came to loot and pillage, not to serve and protect. The Constitution, the environment, the institutions, the Wilsons, and the rest of us are just collateral damage.
No matter what, I hope you spend some time on the damage the administration has done to our intelligence gathering capabilities by proving they put politics above protecting our intelligence assets. No foreign government or their intelligence agencies will EVER forget our government exposed classified information for political purposes. How can our government ever expect someone to risk their very lives in providing intelligence when they know our government won’t even protect its own operations and spies?
The thread is old, but I must respond. I had read about the “outing” of Plame via Novak and was looking for the “story” in the MSM. It didn’t appear. I went searching the web for embellishment, and hit Mark Kleiman. He directed me to both your site Marcy (Next Hurrah) and to Firedoglake (Jane’s theories) about the Plame outing. I have been posting/lurking on FDL since and “check-in” with “Next Hurrah” on almost a daily basis.
sonate — the thread may be aging, but it’s still attracting quality material, yes? I’ve been watching here in the EPU zone; I have the feeling there will be more interesting material that appears overnight.
The root topic has a way of doing that.
Hi Rayne!
My comment won’t be as elegant as those before, but I found FDL via a PressThink link where Jay Rosen was giving kudos to Jane. I got hooked on the Plame (Wilson) material, because before that I was unaware of the *extent* to which the MSCM (main stream corporate media) was spinning and distorting events. Yeah, I had that sense before, but to see this play out over and over on this one issue was riveting, to say the least.
Oh, and not to mention the insane irony of it being a Poppy quote, of course. It’s not new to the blogosphere but it will sure make a helluva impact on the 99.9% of the folks out there who’ve never heard it before.
Emptywheel,
Thanks for your herculean efforts in bringing clarity to these issues. A very big issue I’ve not seen much about is one I raise in this reworking of a comment I made here at FDL last April, re Taylor Marsh’s excellent Mary McCarthy
post:
Every CIA or other intelligence operative is watching with vital interest what happens now, and the rest of us should be deeply interested too, especially since the CIA is being destroyed as an information source and remade into a propaganda source. The Plame Leak did two things, remember: it fogged up clearly seeing the pack of lies that put us into Iraq and to do this it was willing to sell out a high ranking intelligence officer and her WMD networks – but it also told everyone in the CIA (and their spouses) to drink the koolaid, or else watch while their careers are terminated and their human networks –like out-of-date maps on some conference table– are, in Le Carre’s bloodless phrase, “rolled up by the opposition.”
“All the Truth asks, and all it Needs, is the Liberty of Appearing.” –Thos. Jefferson
on George senior: my mother changed her voter registration from ‘official’ (but non-practicing) GOP to Dem when he changed his publicily-proclaimed principles in order to become VP. He may be a nice guy (as I’ve been told by people with long acquaintance with him), but his kids are not. And Shrub is – well, this is a nice place, and I don’t want to mess it up.
Hi Marcy,
I was Joe Wilson’s editor for his book THE POLITICS OF TRUTH. I am very interested in seeing that your book do well and succeed. One thing that has always bugged me from Valerie’s detractors was their imputation that she would have somehow schemed–just before Joe was sent to Niger in Feb. 2002–”oh, I’ll send Joe, so he can put the kibosh on the Niger/Iraq yellowcake link, and thus knock a prop out from under the White House’s as-yet undeclared (in public) decision to invade Iraq.”
Huh? It’s just too implausible, yet they’ve never been called or asked to describe exactly
what motivation she’d have had in sending her husband to Niger?
Please let me know if I can help in any way.
Best wishes,
Philip Turner
Carroll & Graf Publishers
philip.turner@avalonpub.com
In this case, the Bush 43 White House was caught rat-fuc%ing it’s political enemies. This was just a small episode but it is at the center of how the president conducts business and it revealed, in the most significant way, that our president took the country to war on bad intelligence and knew it, or should have.
Our president actions, were focused on presenting a case that the American people would support, truthful or otherwise. We got otherwise.
In the run-up to the ill-conceived aggressive war of choice on Saddam and Iraq not Al Qeada, We have been witness to one of the most powerful misinformation campaigns by a presidency. Yet dogged bloggers and reporters like Murray Wass, Jason Leopold, David Corn and Michael Isakoff have sunk their dogged teeth in to the story like bitbulls.
We have a prosecutor we believe is principled, smart and tough as nails. A modern day hero, in a cesspool a political federal government available to the highest bidder.
I always found it odd that Dick Cheney claimed not to know Joe Wilson. While Cheney was the Secretary of Defense leading up to and during the Persian Gulf War in 1990-91, Joe Wilson was a senior U.S. embassy official in Baghdad. In fact, after the U.S. Ambassador was kicked out of Iraq, Wilson was THE senior U.S. diplomat in Baghdad. And Cheney didn’t know who he was? He had no conversations with him? He engaged in no information gathering with him? Strange.
Perhaps there was some bad blood between the two dating back to that conflict? Might be worth exploring. Clearly, Cheney had a bone to pick and it may have gone deeper than the Niger yellowcake disclosure.
Title?
Snakes on a Plame
All The (Vice) President’s Men.
16 Words $450 Billion and one CIA Agent
Court Jester @
253
“…..i heard that too.” is the pope bavarian?
i came to FDL in late August or early September of last year. i didn’t even know what the word blog meant. and now i have one. i had been suffocating for decades and FDL was oxygen. i have a TV but i haven’t turned it on but twice in the past two months. it was the most disgusting drug but a suprisingly easy habit to break. and i am much better informed than i even imagined i could be.
noting some of the coincidences that are regularly revealed here i would like to share that after about a month of FDL nurture i came to realize that i was located only a couple of hours drive away from jane. within another month or so i learned that in my first job i had worked in a small town where part of her family came from.
if malcomb gladwell ever writes a sequel to his spot-on “The Tipping Point” i am certain that he will do a chapter on how blogging is changing America, and for the better. in the original he includes a section about how ABC’s Peter Jenning’s had some effect on the election of Ronald Reagan. what with our recent highlighting of the mendacity of that corrupt organization i was reminded of this. amazing how “the chickens come home to roost”.
jane and christy have raised my consciousness about both media and politics. they and digby and billmon and recently driftglass and others have inspired me and given me both hope and motivation to be more active in my responsibilties as a citizen of this country and a human being living on this planet.
FDL lead me to you, marcy, and i am repeatedly amazed at your powers of analysis and throughness, doggedness, as it were, ;-). you are a smoldering firedog with a heaped, longlasting bank of coals, and no matter how much hugh hewitt or victoria townsing or the rest of their ilk keep trying to throw water on your fire and blather their way out of this you just keep right on going, just like the inimitable fitzgerald. you are among the best of ankle biters and their ankles are now little more than ragged, festering wounds.
i like “Sixteen Words” for the title of your book. it is succinct, and well-focused. a lot of the other suggestions for titles here may give more details but they sound like so many other book titles. it matters to me not if you have a subtitle. i imagine that could be easily added at the last minute and something might come along between now and press time which will be just the ticket. at the moment my conceit would be “betrayal at the highest levels of government” or some such.
thank you for letting us participate!
ember @ 238
I believe that’s the title Ms. Wilson has selected for her own book.
I became addicted to the story when I saw Repubs & associated pundits (esp. Novack) calling Joe Wilson “partisan” when (a) he worked for HW, who called him a “hero” when he stood up to Hussein and (b) he voted for W in 2000. Wow, you don’t start up the smear machine just for funsies.
Watching Mehlman spend an entire Sunday saying “exonerates, doesn’t implicate” gives me much sympathy for TRex’s recent, er, Pam troubles.
Why does this story matter to me? Because for the first time in American history, the office of the POTUS revealed the identity of an American spy for political gain. To me this is an act of treason. The most fascinating thing about it is the irony. We are living in a time of hyper patriotism. Everybody has a yellow ribbon on their car…support the troops! And yet the Bush supporters who follow this story as closely as we do use every excuse they can think of to defend the administration and the act of revealing Plame’s identity. I would suggest that you go into detail about the excuses they make for the administration and possibly suggest how they are really simply defending their own identity. (They see themselves as intelligent patriots) Talk about how they rationalize this event, it boggles the mind.
Here’s a short list of what I think get’s the crazies to sleep every night:
1)WILSON LIED!! Wilson is liar. He lied about who sent him to Niger and he lied about Iraq aquiring or attempting to aquire uranium from Niger. His op-ed is a lie.
2) Because WILSON LIED!!! he outed his own wife when he wrote the op-ed.
3) Plame was not under cover. She was not a covert operative. She was not a NOC. Remember, Janitors work at the CIA too. Therefore, no damage was done.
4) Because of the massive turf war between the CIA and the white house, the CIA requested a DOJ investigation into the leaking of Plame’s identity as a means of getting political payback for having to take the blame for the bad pre war intelligence.
5) The Butler report vindicates the Bush administration and proves that the British also believe that Iraq aquired or attempted to acquire uranium from Niger.
6) Bush was not the first one to suggest Iraq had nukes. The threat of Iraq possessing nukes was not the straw that broke the camel’s back turning public opinion in favor of invading Iraq.
GIVE ‘EM HELL JANE!
I’m sure Jane will come up with amazing stuff, but something occured to me the other night while watching PBS the other night. Bear with me. There was some kind of music special on, where Reba Macintyre played the lead role from South Pacific. There’s a song about ’seeing her from across a crowded room;’ very romantic. The look on her face was priceless (I was thinking it wasn’t an act!). The guy’s voice was amazing. Anyway, all I could think of was Joe and Valerie Wilson (well, I did think of my wife for a moment). Do you remember that passage in Joe Wilson’s book about seeing Valerie for the first time? Sounds to me like a good opening scene. Their lives are intertwined with ours. Their story is as much about the two of them as any two of us who are lucky enough to meet someone we get to spend the rest of our lives with. Can you imagine how you would feel if that man or woman that you spied “from across a crowded room” was “fair game?” Or how you would feel if the mother of your children (forgive me, this is just not the same as the “father” thing) had her career ruined and her life put in danger? Whoa. Back up the truck and unload the shotguns.
This is probably the stuff of a book in itself, but I would like to see someone encapsulate the run-up to the war in Iraq in a simple way. I’m thinking of the preface to “A Rumor of War” by Philip Caputo, where he managed to condense the motives and mood of America before Vietnam so clearly.
Cheney, et. al., had wanted to overthrow the government in Iraq for a long time. Bush was pulled into their circle as he started planning for his Presidential election run in 1998. In a debate in New Hampshire in December of 1999, he said that he would invade Iraq. This had been in the planning stages for a long time. When Cheney came to power, he had the apparatus of State that would allow him to pursue that goal.
I think that getting the historical backstory right is good for the preface.
the subtitle could be the actual 16 words, in quotes.
“How To Spin A War In 16 Words or Less” (and in the Process Hone Your Skills on Orwellian Politics)
Watergate (or the burglary of) did not bring down the Nixon administration–the coverup did. The Iran-Contra arms swap-for-cash wouldn’t have brought down the Reagan administration either. But the cover-up almost did. That is until Reagan finally admitted to it and apologized to the American people that he supposedly did not know until after the fact that it had occured (that is still highly debateable!). And the coverup of the Monica affair almost brought down the Clinton administration. This has always been about going into a war of choice by this administration but pumping up the propoganda to make everybody on this side of the curtain feel it was an unavoidable and urgently needed action. Afterall a war of neccesity could be justified be the actions taken by this administration to divert troops to Iraq if it appeared it was covered be the legislative autority given to it by our representatives in Congress in the fall of 2002. However, a war of choice, not proven justifiable or APPROVED by language in that piece of legislation might well be grounds for impeachment (especially if there was intent to mislead the Congress, the nation and even the U.N. to begin such a misadventure). This is why the coverup is the initial crime here and the outing of Plame and the demonizing of her husband were only continuation of that coverup.
There is now ample evidence this administrations goal from the very beginning (indeed even before the Supremes crowned them supposedly victors in 2000) was to find a way to go back to Iraq and this time go all the way to Bagdad. Don’t forget the intent for action–to bring down Sadam. There was speeches before 2000 by Rice about regime change in Iraq. There was O’Neils’ book “The Price of Loyalty”. There were the Downing Street memos (www.afterdowningstreet.org.). Etc., etc., etc.
The motivation by this administration has been and can be well documented it was looking for a reason…any reason… to go to war in Iraq. What was missing was legitimate, urgent, and neccessary reasons the public would not only buy but get behind. There still has been little discussion of how the Niger forgeries ended up in British and American hands, who forged them and why they kept re-surfacing inside this administration regardless of the number of times they had been discredited by numerous professionals inside the Intel community.
LaRepublica, the Italian newsprint of note, has published several stories on this (forged) material (can be found at http://www.prospect .org.–American Prospect Online) but it has gotten very meager coverage on the net and absolutely none in the MSM (go figure). With the latest Senate Intelligence Committee findings about no connection between Sadam and al-Qaeda or bin-Laden, advice by the Energy Department disputing the alumunum tubes for centrifuges claims, and the amazing (see report by Carnegie Jan. 04 report-on WMD pre-war evaluation) revealations of no pre-war WMD it becomes clearer each and every passing day the need for this administration to have the MSM stating thier was no crime committed here because Karl Rove was not indicted.
The real story is becoming increasing clear this administration, while ignoring thier own CIA, State, and Energy Departments, went shopping for any and all information to justify thier actions and intent of invading Iraq simply because they wanted to, even if that information had to made up. Rice has often stated she did not know how the 16 words made it’s way into the State of the Union address even after it had been removed, upon CIA request, at least from one previous speech the President made in 2002. It is very interesting then that the Niger forgeries first surfaced (according to LaRepublica) at a time the critical vote in Congress authorizing the President to use all neccessary force to disarm Sadam was being debated. Since the forgeries were first peddled to an Italian journalist, it is interesting to note that Stephen Hadley had a secret meeting in Washington on Sept. 9, 2002 with Nicolo Pollari, chief of Italy’s military intelligence service (SISMI) one month before the forgeries surfaced. That’s the Stephen Hadley who at the time was Deputy National Security Advisor directly under Rice.
The outing of Plame was a response to not only coverup the known but ignored warnings that the claim Sadam was attempting to obtain yellowcake from Niger was false but to distract the MSM and the public that the evidence cited by the President was purposely falsified to assist in obtaining a rationale for going to war. A rationale that if investigated thoroghly would demostrate that it wasn’t just bad intel that got us into Iraq. It was Itel made up from whole cloth that never existed before. That is the crime. That is the original impeachable offense. That is the reason this administration keeps up the propoganda campaign and why it committed the additional crime of outing a covert CIA agent. Folks it’s called survival and that is this administration is struggling to maintain. That is why the whole truth needs to be told. Jack
Suggestion(s) for book title:
16 Words: How the Bush Administration Slamdunked the American People [to Go to War]
Thanks so much for your efforts, Marcy and FDL. Good luck with the book!
Nan
My attraction to this story has more to do with Plame’s CIA front company and sources overseas. Its logical to assume, and no matter what spin anyone in the U.S. puts on it, that once her name was leaked every intelligence agency worldwide backtracked her every move with the hope that they could locate anyone with in their own nations that had associated with her or her front company in the past. If they were successful and linked her to say a nuclear scientist in their own nation then they would arrest, interrogate, torture, or kill that person. In addition, there is no telling as to how many current sources have decided that they will no longer provide information due to this incident. They may feel its to risky or that they may be next if their CIA contact is “outed”. Only the CIA knows for sure how damaging this really is though.
Maybe none of what I have mentioned happened at all but one thing is for sure. This story was used by foreign intelligence agencies, via their media to send a subtle hint to any current sources in their home nations. The hint being “Do not trust the Americans. They will out your contact to and when they do we will find you.”
Just another angle to the story that I thought you might ponder for your book. I look forward to reading it.
Joe,
What a story: (Where is the Times? The Post?)
It’s hard to deny that for personal monetary and political gain, these Republican-Corp creeps have torn the eyes and ears out of our intelligence apparatus — perhaps literally– and are now busy driving the brains out of it. There is a ghastly human cost to this, as you say. And if there is one thing an empire needs to have in order to keep running, it’s a bright and subtle intelligence apparatus, not a FEMA-Katrina bunch of bungling political Stooges. These guys are killing our empire as well as our Constitution.
But all empires die, perhaps for the same reasons.