Comments on: Late Nite FDL: Brace Yourselves

By: Czarmangis

Czarmangis — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 06:15:55 +0000

lucky @ 335

The profanity and vulgarity in the original article is food for those who oppose us. While I detest the neocons as much as anyone, I would prefer a more calm attack. Vile only outrages and inspires our enemies. Lets clean it up here.
Thank you

Fuck off.

Thanks!

Nice…please continue in that manner you snotnosed little children.You make it sooo Ezzzz for the GOP.

By: nikto

nikto — Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:27:56 +0000

WHAT RIGHT-WING REPUBLICANS *REALLY* ARE:

(Brace yourself for a shock)

http://altair44.blogspot.com/

By: Tom Hyland

Tom Hyland — Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:48:12 +0000

“How stupid does he think we are?”

At least 39% percent of the Amrican people are idiotic dolts.

By: Patrick

Patrick — Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:44:09 +0000

lucky @ 335

The profanity and vulgarity in the original article is food for those who oppose us. While I detest the neocons as much as anyone, I would prefer a more calm attack. Vile only outrages and inspires our enemies. Lets clean it up here.
Thank you

Fuck off.

Thanks!

By: xebecs

xebecs — Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:40:17 +0000

FishGuyDave @
329

Xebecs, I don’t know the answer — I’ve been looking for one myself lately. I don’t know whether it’s possible to actually get to some people in the sense that if they’re not willing to think, we can’t do it for them.

My take on the woman was that she was the clueless sort whose first encounter with “information” on the topic was the Pt911 film, but who might not have been a hard-core righty.

Perhaps it’s not a matter of getting through to people who won’t think, but people who haven’t been paying attention.

You and I know to look first at the source of information, and then to check the veracity using google and trusted web sites, but many (most?) people don’t. How do we get into their “visual field”?

By: Rayne

Rayne — Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:16:53 +0000

Is it just me, or are we seeing another rash of f*cking concern trolling?

;-)

Mornin’, FirePups. Easterners, batten down; rain coming your way, got a mess of it last night.

On to the next thread…

By: twolf1

twolf1 — Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:32:51 +0000

new thread

By: montag

montag — Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:29:00 +0000

lucky @ 334

The profanity and vulgarity in the original article is food for those who oppose us. While I detest the neocons as much as anyone, I would prefer a more calm attack. Vile only outrages and inspires our enemies. Lets clean it up here.
Thank you

Gee, I prefer accuracy, and these assholes deserve some bile spewed in their direction–and here’s hoping they don’t duck quickly enough.

Cheers.

By: Old Sow

Old Sow — Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:28:59 +0000

Lucky, if you are new here, this is an ongoing topic of discussion that rouses high emotions on both sides. The rule here is if it’s okay with the owners and the moderators, it goes. But point taken here.

By: Capeman

Capeman — Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:28:10 +0000

My big worry in the coming year has to do with a tactic that I have been seeing more and more, the denigration of basic civil rights.
When I read “because they want to uphold the ancient judicial traditions”, I immediately remembered an article in the NY Times Magazine on August 20th by Weekly Standard’s Christopher Caldwell. His thesis was that our civil rights “are overly punctilious, and damaging to law enforcement” and that “they are temporary adjustments that were useful under certain specific circumstances in part of Europe between World War II and the late 20th century.”
The Post 8/10 World
The point coming down the road is (with a nod to Mr. Orwell) that some people are “more equal than others”, thus, only some are entitled to a fair trial by jury and only some are entitled to privacy, only some are entitled to vote or a fair counting of votes, etc.

Be afraid, be very afraid.