newtonusr @328

I went to the Lieberman blog briefly after a head’s up from *ilson and was disgusted by all the anti-Lamont garbage. Lieberliar’s web site looks like the Drudge Report.

When I read the article you highlighted it clicked that Lieberliar has indicated that there is dirt coming out about Lamont so stay tuned. So, I’m wondering – is Lieberliar going to benefit directly from the opposition research and negative campaign dollars the GOP is doling out? Digging up an 8 year old email from a constituent is a good start (of course if that’s the worst they can do – it’s pretty pathetic). If Lieberliar is part of the GOP smear effort – will that be enough to have the Dem leadership denounce him?

Surely Lieberman has plenty of stuff that can be used to show he’s a hypocrite and a liar. Why doesn’t the Lamont campaign start with Lieberliar’s own words about running against a three term Senator?

Hi dab from CT!
First off, I’m from CA, so I don’t have a pipeline into CT mindsets, except yours and your lovely friends from there.
Second, as rumors began that RGJoe would go Indy, I dismissed the idea – i thought Bubba had struck a deal, so RGJoe would not be able to taint him. Wrong.
Third, I thought the entire state would tar & feather the jerk. Wrong.
Fourth, in the unlikely event that 2 & 3 didn’t happen, I believed the Dems in the Senate would strip RGJoe’s committee assignments, parking space, washroom key and dining priviliges, Wrong.

So I think it would take a literal miracle for the Senate Dems to jettison RGJoe. Hope I’m wrong.

And Lamont has run the cleanest campaign I have ever seen (I’ve been involved in campaigns since ‘64, and the only campaign I can remember that was even close was when a great guy named Jerry Waldie ran for CA Governer in ‘74).
Lamont simply will not get down in the mud with these fools. Or am I wrong?

*ilson46201 @ 378

the old Schnabel recording brings out the rhythmic idiosyncrasies better because it seems ‘awkward’. Modern pianists know how to handle those passages better …

When I was at Oberlin, a piano major friend turned me on to Schnabel’s Beethoven. Later I discovered his Schubert performances. But my favorites are his recordings for Vox of the late Mozart concerti.

I can’t find a recording of Sviatoslav Richter doing Op. 111, but I keep hoping.

do you do bit-torrents? there are TWO different Richters doing op111 at demonoid.com — recording done 30 years apart. if you dont do bittorrents, I’ll snatch them and burn a CD or 2 for you…

*ilson46201 @ 378

the old Schnabel recording brings out the rhythmic idiosyncrasies better because it seems ‘awkward’. Modern pianists know how to handle those passages better …

When I was at Oberlin, a piano major friend turned me on to Schnabel’s Beethoven. Later I discovered his Schubert performances. But my favorites are his recordings for Vox of the late Mozart concerti.

I can’t find a recording of Sviatoslav Richter doing Op. 111, but I keep hoping.

i’d like to hear Moravec do it.

the old Schnabel recording brings out the rhythmic idiosyncrasies better because it seems ‘awkward’. Modern pianists know how to handle those passages better …

When I was at Oberlin, a piano major friend turned me on to Schnabel’s Beethoven. Later I discovered his Schubert performances. But my favorites are his recordings for Vox of the late Mozart concerti.

I can’t find a recording of Sviatoslav Richter doing Op. 111, but I keep hoping.