gguttncq qerzkzxoa hcbrgjtgy

They are deliberately changing the facts of history. That is wrong. It’s that simple.

John Kerry is the bravest, gentlest, warmest, most wonderful human being I ever voted for! Even more than Big Dog, his own bad self!

Good for you Matt! I met him myself twice in 2004 and found him to be amiable sort…not to intellectual but a likeable man. The worked with the Clintons in the late 1970s; trust me, there’s no “there” there.

matt @
250

UptownNYChick @ 177

matt @ 173

The best way to handle these guys is to engage them constructively…we’re preaching to the choir and wasting our time. Lets change there minds by talking to them, not at ‘em

It’s a nice idea, but I have had these people tell me 1. Saddam Hussein DID have weapons of mass destruction, 2. He moved them to syria before the war, 3. they are burried in the sand, 4. the intelligence that we had was Clinton’s fault, 5. We are winning in Afghanistan, 6. we are winning in Iraq.
They are talking AT us, how exactly do we talk WITH them?

Negotiations with Saddam were never possible. A democratic Iraq will inevitably change the middle east for decades to come.

Oh yes, negotiations are always possible, matt. There will be no hope for a democratic Iraq until we leave– please go study history and then come back to engage. :)

Hi Angie,

I appreciate the post.

The United States is still the beacon of hope to many disenfranchised peoples around the globe. Eastern Europe is a good example of positive US engagement. Millions throughout the middle east have taken notice of the trend (…Egypt is a good example here), and are making thier own path to freedom. History shows that once democracy has been inculcated in a population, there’s no stopping it…

As I said before, buddy, can you paradigm.

How would anyone know that ‘negotiations with Saddam were never possible’?
We never tried to negotiate, after Bush took over. He doesn’t do ‘negotiate’, he only does ‘my way or my army’.

UptownNYChick @ 177

matt @ 173

The best way to handle these guys is to engage them constructively…we’re preaching to the choir and wasting our time. Lets change there minds by talking to them, not at ‘em

It’s a nice idea, but I have had these people tell me 1. Saddam Hussein DID have weapons of mass destruction, 2. He moved them to syria before the war, 3. they are burried in the sand, 4. the intelligence that we had was Clinton’s fault, 5. We are winning in Afghanistan, 6. we are winning in Iraq.
They are talking AT us, how exactly do we talk WITH them?

Negotiations with Saddam were never possible. A democratic Iraq will inevitably change the middle east for decades to come.

Oh yes, negotiations are always possible, matt. There will be no hope for a democratic Iraq until we leave– please go study history and then come back to engage. :)

matt @ 173

The best way to handle these guys is to engage them constructively…we’re preaching to the choir and wasting our time. Lets change there minds by talking to them, not at ‘em

It’s a nice idea, but I have had these people tell me 1. Saddam Hussein DID have weapons of mass destruction, 2. He moved them to syria before the war, 3. they are burried in the sand, 4. the intelligence that we had was Clinton’s fault, 5. We are winning in Afghanistan, 6. we are winning in Iraq.
They are talking AT us, how exactly do we talk WITH them?

Negotiations with Saddam were never possible. A democratic Iraq will inevitably change the middle east for decades to come.