
Remember Joe Klein recently said:
Rove has shown a positive genius for organizing campaigns around poisonous trivia. He will question the patriotism of Democrats (and, once again, be aided by those on the noisome left who believe that the U.S. is a malignant, imperialistic force in the world). He will deploy an ugly, stone-throwing distortion of Christian "values," especially against those Democrats who choose not to discriminate against homosexuals. And if things get really desperate, he will play the race card, as Republicans have ever since they sided against the civil rights movement in the 1960s.
Let's play connect-the-dots:
Republican Sen. Conrad Burns, whose recent comments have stirred controversy, says the United States is up against a faceless enemy of terrorists who "drive taxi cabs in the daytime and kill at night."During a fundraiser Wednesday with first lady Laura Bush, the three-term Montana senator talked about terrorism, tax cuts and the money he has brought to his state. Burns is one of the more vulnerable Senate incumbents, facing a tough challenge from Democrat Jon Tester.
He has drawn criticism in recent weeks for calling his house painter a "nice little Guatemalan man" during a June speech. Burns, whosere-election campaign is pressing for tighter immigration controls, also suggested that the man might be an illegal immigrant. The campaign later said the worker is legal.
Allen was making a campaign stop and spotted a college student who was shadowing him - videotaping all his appearances - to gather possible ammunition for the campaign of his opponent, Democrat James Webb. The young man, S.R. Sidarth, is of Indian descent. Allen pointed him out for the all-white crowd, calling him "Macaca, or whatever his name is", and then said to Sidarth, "Welcome to America and the real world of Virginia". Sidarth happens to have be a Virginia native.Allen and his aides scrambled to assure reporters that the senator had no idea that macaca is the genus to which macaques belong. Nor did the senator have a clue that in some European countries "makak" is a derogatory term for North African immigrants.
As we set to see the 3rd Laffey/Chafee debate tonight at 8:00pm on Channel 12, the National Republican Senatorial Campaign has unleashed a dirty, malicious and racist ad attacking Cranston Mayor Steve Laffey in an attempt to portray him as ‘soft’ on immigration and homeland security.Click here to see the ad.
The funny thing is that Lincoln Chafee supported every pro-immigrant bill in the Senate – from a legalization for farm workers to the legalization bill by McCain-Kennedy. Trying to position Steve Laffey to the left of Chafee is like trying to put Joe Lieberman to the left of Ted Kennedy. Ain’t gonna happen folks.
The Lieberman campaign is trying to frighten white voters in Connecticut — and Democrats in Washington — by reminding them over and over again that Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson support Lamont. This week, the senator’s aides told the New York Times that playing the two African-American preachers off against Lamont will enhance Lieberman’s appeal on an independent ballot line. "Primary night was the first time that many Connecticut voters saw Lamont on TV, and he’s surrounding himself with two of the more divisive and problematic figures in the Democratic Party," said Dan Gerstein, the Lieberman campaign’s communications director.
Any questions?
Update: As if on cue, Pat Buchanan:
What I would like is — I’d like the country I grew up in. It was a good country. I lived in Washington, D.C., 400,000 black folks, 400,000 white folks, in a country 89 or 90 percent white. I like that country.
Looks like the November GOP War on Brown People is already in full swing.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
you gotta be kiddin’
NED!
beaten to the fitz :)
NED!
again
Fear - it’s all they got left.
Thoughts on Bush’s address today before the American Legion National Convention. Part 1.
Of preliminaries and strawmen:
You see it’s all very simple. It’s black and white. Us against them. Of course, the world isn’t this simple and the Middle East is one of the most complicated regions on the planet. Simple minded solutions to complex problems are pretty much doomed to failure. This tells you a lot where we as a nation and Bush as a leader started going wrong, i.e. from the start.
The simple solution:
Outside of the initial invasion of Afghanistan, what successes there have been in the war on terrorism have been due to ordinary nuts and bolts police work. No one is saying that the military could not or should not be part of this struggle but militarizing our approach to terror is an unsubstantiated jump in logic. “Fighting them there so we don’t have to fight them here” is yet another strawman. In fact, fighting them there does not preclude that we will not be attacked again here. It also ignores the animosity engendered and recruitment potential of a “fighting them there” policy which makes our security situation worse not better.
The results:
Afghanistan:
This, of course, assumes that there was a lot of “progress” to roll back. In fact, the warlords who dominate and poison so much of Afghan life never went away. Nor are the Taliban some alien force operating outside of and unsupported by segments of the population. The Taliban are extremely repressive but then so is much of Afghan society. Unmentioned is the burgeoning production of opium. That’s progress of a different kind.
Lebanon:
Huh? Israel bombs Lebanon back to the Stone Age but it’s our enemies fault, and the international community led by us leaving Lebanon to bleed for a month was really a show of support. There is nothing I could or need to say about this.
Iran:
Some might find this pronouncement menacing. It is really an enunciation that Bush’s policy is that he has no policy. You could see this as a push for sanctions which are unlikely and an admission that currently there is no military option.
Black is the new black. And rolling out that product in August: they must be shitting themselves.
Under pressure, their true colors come out…
Bush’s address before the American Legion National Convention Part 2
Iraq:
OK, one, Saddam did not harbor terrorists. This has been debunked over and over again. Two, Saudis raised tons of money for the families of suicide bombers. Did we invade them? I didn’t think so. Saddam did invade his neighbors, first Iran then Kuwait. There was something called if I remember correctly the First Gulf War which dealt with the invasion of Kuwait. Now while Saddam did possess and use weapons of mass destruction principally against Iran and his own citizens, that First Gulf War that Nush seems to have forgotten about resulted in the elimination of his WMD and the programs which produced them. Does anyone besides me find it curious that Bush who thinks the UN is worthless should, nevertheless, cite UN resolutions as a casus belli for the invasion of Iraq. Or that he should blame Saddam for not “openly abandoning” WMD which did not exist? Or that he has never shown himself to be particularly eager to hold Israel accountable for its longstanding disregard of international law and UN resolutions in its occupation of the West Bank and Gaza? So having put forth a series of conditions that were either spurious or impossible, Bush invaded Iraq. Makes me feel better knowing someone like him is in charge, I can tell you.
The un-civil war:
So getting killed does not constitute involvement, good to know. I suppose the same could be said about Jews and the Holocaust. They weren’t involved in the Holocaust. They were just killed by it. Makes me feel better as it no doubt would make their relatives and survivors. Also a clarification is in need here: “a small number of Iraqis are engaged in sectarian violence,” these are also known as the guys with the guns.
Another simple solution:
A few minor quibbles. Maliki’s government is a joke. At best, it’s spoils divided among militias. At worse, you don’t want to know. We have been in Iraq 3 years 5 1/2 months. Just how much more refining do our tactics need to get? Just brain storming here but do you think there might be after this length of time, oh, say, a problem with our overall strategy, as in it’s not working or we don’t have one?
Another strawman:
I see. So now we are letting the terrorists define the parameters of the war on terror or perhaps I should say Bush’s take on what the terrorists are thinking is defining our response?
The president speaks in the present and future tense every time he says something that purports to be a refutation of critics’ claims.
“They say I have done things that are bad, to which I say that I am doing good things, and will do good things - so therefore I have done nothing bad and they are totally wrong.”
Bush has no policy. He breaks things. Like the terrible toddler he is. He makes messes for others to clean up. He’s determined to
wreak as much havocinvade as many Middle Eastern countries as possible because he thinks only he is man enough to do it.He is perpetually arrested in the terrible twos.
Contrary to what he believes–as his actions demonstrate–he is not the divinely chosen son of God, he is the spoiled son of Babs.
astralplame @ 9
CAuse all the bad things wen down the memory hole
This Rocky Anderson thing needs coverage before it gets expunged.
astral 9 - even shorter chimpy = “gonna! gonna-gonna!”
Hugh - Your post is Mary-esque.
I’d only be repeating myself if I comment on Rover’s alleged genuis. So shorter me, via analogy - the magician’s trick loses all its power over the audience once they know how it’s done. Klein obviously is very slow.
Maybe Rove is somehow paid by the number of times his sycophants print or state the word genuis. Hey, you never know.
Jane,
I mean no criticism of you, but to your list I would add the abhorrent, year-long (and beyond) mistreatment of the people of color in Louisiana.
Bush’s address before the American Legion National Convention Part 3
And another strawman:
Shorter Bush: I don’t dispute your patriotism but if you disagree with me you are a craven idiot and endangering the country. Note how Bush enumerates our “enemies” but how they all morph into the single category of “terrorists” attacking us here at home. As I said above, fighting them there doesn’t mean they won’t attack here as well.
In conclusion and yes, another strawman:
So there it is, folks, you can either agree with Bush and whatever he’s saying or deliver you children into the hands of nuclear armed terrorists. Well, what’s it going to be? Those mushroom clouds are gathering.
My suggestion is none of the above.
kate o’beirne just made some snotty statement about democrats rising to the bait on dumsfeld’s comments… everyone just ignored her… very nice!
OT - Buchanan: ‘The Country I Grew Up In’ Was ‘89 or 90 Percent White. I Like That Country’
Talking point:
Bush never tires of asserting that his primary job is “to protect the American people” (implicitly by whatever means he deems necessary).
I must have missed something in Article II, Section I of the Constitution:
Mr. Bush, we hire many hundreds of thousands of capable people and train them to defend and protect us in circumstances where we cannot personally fend for oursleves. YOUR job is to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” not to piss on it at every turn when you’re not actively ignoring its inconvenient provisions.
_
Sophist @
12
I posted links to 3 vids of Rocky Anderson in the last thread EPU’d and awaiting moderation…won’t post links again here, cuz would trigger same problem — go to homepage
http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/
all embedded and require QT 7 (but smaller files)
1,257 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ JUST GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Prairie Sunshine:
“…son of Babs.” I positively LOVE it! Now if this were just a scene from an Akroyd and Belushi movie, we could all laugh and have a beer (or whatever) and exclaim how clever the writers were. This last 6 years haven’t been a movie though…it’s the real thing.
KEEP THE FAITH AND GET OUR KIDS HOME FROM HELL NOW!!!
Still… “son of Babs”, I love it!
It’s now, what, 3 solid weeks since the Connecticut primary?
And Joe Lieberman’s website still says this:
#10: Please don’t insult my toddler–he could certainly run the country better than George W. Bush. But then so could a monkey.
Go Webb!
Hugh - I thought you post was genius. ;)
While I mostly agree with, “OK, one, Saddam did not harbor terrorists” there was the PKK.
Kind of like Bush harbors the KKK. And kinda like Bush has been harboring the PKK for the last three years. ;)
Prarie Sunshine - “Like the terrible toddler he is.”
That’s my diagnosis - caught in “I da baby” land and the military and intelligence and science and economic structures of this country are the kittens he unconcernedly jokes to death.
OldCoastie @ 13
or even
“gonna! heh heh heh, gonna-gonna!”
Alright - he’s not that funny. Let’s go with CHokes.
He will question the patriotism of Democrats (and, once again, be aided by those on the noisome left who believe that the U.S. is a malignant, imperialistic force in the world).
Can someone please explain to Klein that pretending our country is Candyland does not prove anyone’s patriotism? Sometimes the U.S. IS a malignant, imperialistic force in the world. Recognizing this is how we fix it, which is something in which an alleged “liberal” like Klein ought to be interested.
By the way, that picture of Rove is chilling. Reminds of Pacino in “The Devil’s Advocate”, especially with that sinister looking lady in the lower left corner.
astralplame @ 25
oh yeah, I definitely forgot the heh heh part…
Speaking about blacks that rove (he’s still in charge of the Katrina portfolio right?) doesn’t give a **** about;
http://operationeden.blogspot.com/
twolf1 @
18
Finland is probably still more than 90% white. Maybe Pat should move there….assuming they will take him. But why should I wish such a fate on the lovely people of Finland? Go, Sibelius!
Fear - it’s all they got left.
It’s all they ever had…
Hugh @ 5
Actually, I think there is a more nefarious purpose. Bush will push for sanctions (via Mustache Bolton), wait a few months and announce that sanctions aren’t/didn’t work.
It will then become necessary to invade Iran to prevent them from having the nukular weapon that they don’t have yet.
Iran is Farsi for Iraq which is Arabic for Vietnam…
BC
K. Harris, coming up on hardballs…
That
bitchrunning in Florida up next on Hardball![Moderator: tsk, tsk, tsk.]
OldCoastie @ 31
filing this under “mental images I did not really need”
hee hee!
*ilbo - you might want to edit your description for Ms. Harris… not cool…
OldCoastie @ 31
Eeeewwww. When I was in HS (and dinosaurs roamed the earth) I thought girls who used a palette knife (or worse, a mason’s trowel) to apply their make-up were … yuck.
KH reminded me of that revulsion, with the added feature that she’s incapable of speaking the truth to anyone.
BC
a week from today I will be oppo-photographing like Sidarth a fundraiser for a local GOP Congresscritter-aspirant. I hope my “Who you calling MACACA?” T-shirt arrives in time for me to wear it…
OldCoastie @ 34
Actually, my bitch resents the comparison. Diva (a Belgian Shepherd) is a hell of a lot smarter than K Harris…
BC
Bush:
Oh, my. Let’s see. The Nazis attack Great Britain. So Winston Churchill, itching for a chance to show who’s boss in the Falkland Islands, sends his valuable Army off to the South Atlantic to fight the few Argentinian troops there. The Argentinians and, for that matter, the Nazis send some guerillas down there to pin down the British Army, taking pot shots at them from high hillsides. They start blowing people up in the Falklands and bleeding the British Army dry there.
And this proves that the Falklands are the center of the war against Nazism, because the Nazis choose to pin the British Army down?
In this scenario, the British would have made a huge mistake and if the Nazis were to exploit that mistake it would make it not a mistake?
George Bush is a far deeper thinker than I am, obviously. I cannot follow his logic.
Kate seems to have overused the botox… amazing she can still blink her eyes!
test
Katherine Harris
Talking about one deluded woman!
The only way she wins is by totally rigging the voting machines.
The GOP is playing to its racist base because that’s all they have got. They know that moderates and independents are moving away from them, so their only viable strategy is to hope that they have enough wingnut voters to carry the elections.
Mary, EPU, thanks,
I was thinking of Ansar al-Islam and Zarqawi although it is true for the PKK as well. All of these operated in areas of Iraq covered by the US no-fly zone and were outside of Saddam’s reach.
Do you think they let Harris onto airplanes these days with all the gel she has in her boobs?
my bitch Devious uses no augmentation on her ten teats …
Kath Harris says she’s won twice when down by *thirty* points - “you can make polls say whatever you want…”
Well she does have some experience in elections turning out wrong….
Hugh @42 - I wasn’t serious about Sadaam “harboring” the PKK; anymore than I think Britain or Spain “harbored” the al-Qaeda related terrorists on their soil, or that we “harbor” the KKK here.
You can find terrorists anywhere you look. Bush’s more unique ability is to create them where they weren’t.
how do repug Floridians bridge the gap b/n the Cuban immigration policies (is it called something like “dry feet”?) and those polices affecting other Spanish speakin’ nations?
Mary - If I said that Hugh’s post was “Mary-esque,” and you said that Hugh’s post was “genuis,” aren’t you really saying that Mary is a genuis? ;-)
OldCoastie @ 47
Why would they want to do that?
tenor, 30:
Not an invasion (as in ground operations a la Iraq). What is in the works are “surgical strikes” and “commando attacks.” This is in a sense worse than an invasion because it has the deceptive allure of “quick and decisive” but we know that it is never that simple. Rummy may think it is, but Rummy is delusional. Iran has many ways to retaliate, including forcing oil to $200/bbl.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOL.....ersh.iran/
ooo - did Harris just call Noron a ‘liberal” because Noron mentioned KH’s connection to Duke Cunningham?
harris re; cunningham scandal - that’s old news, people of FL aren’t interested in that. we’ve moved on
With all due respect, I am not sure that Rove is truly *that* much of a political genius. Can he single-handedly implant the acceptance and the love of racism as the norm in the minds of all these politicians? No, I think this is more of an example of sheer ugly coincidence — the GOP knows that their strongest and staunchest base of supporters are all racists, so their representatives are, well, representative of that segment of the American population. To be fair, the right has made similar conspiracy charges against us (we’re all in cahoots and The Kos is our Great and Secret Leader, remember…toe the party line now, people, er I mean comrades) when it comes to connecting the hidden dots. Perhaps this is just Turd Blossom exploiting the Homo ignomunts in the Establishment through a cause they can all identify with.
One thing about Katherine Harris. She seems to be in the category of kooky that I associate with some few women who hit the second or third glass ceiling. They had the will, the luck, the connections, the instinct to break up into a male-dominated power structure - at some cost to their own ego and super-ego. After years of fighting and succeeding, they finally think “This is it, here I am, I made it - I am IN THE CLUB”. But then they hit a “bridge too far”, and the wheels start spinning, the engine overheats, and the kookiness really lets loose.
btw - the trick to keeping sane in that situation is to never let yourself believe you are in the club.
ConcernedCitizen @ 53
I think Rove really likes to stir up the shit - chaos and fighting means people aren’t paying attention to other stuff like wars and death and Halliburton…
OldCoastie @ 47
They don’t. Cubans are refugees from communism, that’s the entire story. Does it make sense? No. But it didn’t start with the present administration either, and is really as a good a question for dem’s as for repugs. You would think that fleeing from a Pinochet or Honduran death squads would count for something. It doesn’t.
Shorter Prof: In military tactics one does not determine whether something is, or is not, a diversionary tactic by observing that people are fighting.
That’s what diversionary tactics do: they trick you into fighting the wrong battle, so you don’t have the strength or wisdom to fight the right one.
The whole point of a diversion is to suck you into fighting in the wrong place. The fact that you and they end up fighting there does not make it any less a diversion.
If it’s the wrong place to fight, you have still been sucked into a diversion.
If we have a strategic goal (which I doubt), we should be pursuing it — not responding to a diversion (or picking the wrong tactic in the first place)
No surprise, as we approach Labor Day weekend and the traditional turning of attention (as much as actually happens) to the fall elections, Rover’s amping it up.
It’s gut-check time.
Let’s look at who Rove really is, the product of a dysfunctional home life who got really good at reading the immediate vibe and manipulating his way through it.
A product of the oil patch who latched onto a rich patron in the Walker-Bush clan and who’s been playing with house money ever since. He’s got nothing of his own to lose.
A direct-mail guy who knows how to craft and test messages, lots of ‘em, and how to slice and dice an audience and tell it exactly what it wants to hear to serve his purpose without those pesky morals or commitments to a higher purpose getting in the way.
Above all, he knows how to handle the Ivy League metrosexual scions of the Democrat Party: just keep raisin’ the ante until they fold. He pulled their beanie caps down over their heads, snapped their suspenders and took their lunch money. Heck, he even nutted a Bonesman, albeit in service of another Bonesman.
This isn’t the time to hold ‘em or to fold ‘em. This is the time to call his bluff. Reality’s caught up to him, and he hasn’t quite filled that inside straight he needed. Keep his hands away from the deck, don’t let him kick over the table, be a little quicker on the draw and we won’t need Fitz.
Waittaminnit– Joe Klein says that the left smells bad? Or does he just not know what ‘noisome’ means?
Pathetic.
oh yuck. hitchens on hardballz now. looks hung over — kind of slumping
Don’t know if I’ll have time to read all comments here, but had to rush to the bottom to give a big tip of the hat to Prairie Sunshine:
Contrary to what he believes–as his actions demonstrate–he is not the divinely chosen son of God, he is the spoiled son of Babs.
God bless you for giving me a new “swear word” –
Next time I call someone an s.o.b. I’ll tell them it means “son of a Babs” — much, much worse than the traditional acronym.
So is Bush against fascism or facts-ism?
So when she brings her dog to the State House what type of legislaion results? Sorry, I meant to say lonely wannabee control type of freak.
twolf1 @ 60
mumbling like he’s already been imbibing the hair of the dog.
orangejumpsuit @ 50
OJS,
They’re trotting Reza Pahlavi (son of the deposed Shah) just like they trotted out Chalabi before Iraq. He’s saying the same tired shit, too. “Iran needs to be a democracy,” with the subtext, “And I’m the guy to lead it.”
If regime change is the goal (and Bush’s rhetoric seems directed at regime change to me) attacks by Delta Force and the Ranger brigade aren’t going to do it.
And just exactly when has publicity made any of these idiots reconsider anything?
BC
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14602723/?GT1=8404
poll at msgop:
Do you agree with President Bush when he likens the struggle against Islamic fundamentalism with the fight against Nazis and communists? * 182143 responses
Yes. Bin Laden and others are the Hitlers and Stalins of our times.
43%
Maybe. But I’m going to need some more convincing one way or the other.
4.2%
No. This is just dishonest, warmongering designed to scare voters about national security in time for this fall’s elections.
52%
Christopher Twitchens
Hugh @ 16
I can’t remember who said it, but I recall reading a great statement two or three years ago that we would know the fight against terrorism was lost when every enemy was referred to as a terrorist.
And here we are.
al Scooter - Even if Rover was a genuis, which he is not (and I won’t repeat why - AND THE THREAD CHEERS), he can’t beat reality - no one can.
punaise @ 67
it would be even better if his middle initial were “D”
Prof @ 2:54 pm (#57) - If we’re going to talk about Nazi Germany and useless diversions in the same sentence, then their North African campaign might be a good example. We and the British, among others, faught very hard there, but from the German’s point of view it was a useless diversion of resources that kept Rommel’s armies away from the Russian front and western Europe. The reason they initially got involved was to assist their none-too-useful ally Mussolini in conquering the region.
twolf1
Oh yeah. Noron’s still on point too, so watch out. Just called Hitch “my dear” after he tried to correct her intro.
AND cut off discussion before he could even wipe the drool offn his mike. oh dear indeed….
[THANKS Olbermann…..]
Dan Whitworth @ 59
The same thought occured to me when I read where he said “noisome.” Joe can be noisome even when he is quiet.
isn’t it pitiful that in 1776 we kicked our King off the country but in 2006 Bush is pimping a Shah for Iran ?
OT - WaPo puts picture of john mark karr over caption about Ken Melhman
via HuffPo
*ibo:
you forgot “lonely wannabee creepy strange botoxed control type of freak ;-)
astralplame @ 54:
I disagree. Harris is clearly “woop woop” crazy, but it seems to me the result of an inappropriate sense of entitlement, resulting from a well-to-do family and helping to perpetrate the fraud that was the 2000 Florida “election.”
No doubt she feels an absolute right to win, or be coronated, and sees the electoral process as irritant and formality.
Hopefully, she’ll completely melt down soon and publicly spill the beans about how she “earned” the seat the electorate will deny her.
RevDeb @ 40
Shhhh…she might hear you!
If we don’t say it out loud, she might not remember what she did in 2000. *g*
Hugh @ 62
Yes.
Nothing speaks of democracy like the son of the former King. I’m sold.
Hugh –
You provide excellent analysis, and bless you for wading through all that crap I won’t even go near (btw — did you hear Olbermann say, in a toss-away line earlier in last night’s broadcast, that Bush would be speaking today “so don’t wear your good shoes”? Bwaahahahah!).
However, when I came upon this sentence –
So there it is, folks, you can either agree with Bush and whatever he’s saying or deliver you children into the hands of nuclear armed terrorists.
I realized that the “nuclear armed terrorists” are really the evil bastards in THIS administration, but upon re-reading your sentence, I realize THAT fits, too.
astralplame @ 54
precisely, couldn’t have said it better.
OT–LHP, thanks for your response on Moment of Zen.
Mad Dogs @ 78
I’m sure she remembers it vividly and tries to remind BushCo of it whenever possible.
Bargain Countertenor @ 79
Remember though, that Bush is against everything he’s for …
BC
Hugh –
Re your #61 –
It’s all a simple pronunciation error by the Deciderer in Chief. He doesn’t hate “fascists,” he hates “fat shits.”
Evil Parallel Universe @ 69
I think he’s been more lucky than good but rapidly running out of luck…
Evil Parallel Universe @ 69
In the long run, he’s all dead.
Meanwhile, we need to limit the damage he can enable and get some kind of start on saving the planet before 1/20/09.
OT - Connecticutblog reports Lieberman is now publicly calling for a series of debates with Lamont and the other candidates:
http://connecticutblog.blogspot.com/
Sen. Joe Lieberman called on the four other candidates in the hotly contested U.S. Senate race Thursday to meet next week and agree to a debate schedule.
Lieberman, who lost the Democratic primary to businessman Ned Lamont and is now running as an independent, sent letters to Lamont, Republican Alan Schlesinger, Green Party candidate Ralph Ferrucci and Concerned Citizens candidate Timothy Knibbs.
“Voters are eager to know what we will do to solve the problems affecting their daily lives,” Lieberman wrote in his letter. He also said the candidates have an opportunity to set “a high standard for a new politics of civil engagement.”
Bargain Countertenor @ 65
They can’t really think that the Iranians would accept the Shah’s son? Can they?
Prof @ 57
Exactly. Right now their diversionary tactic is using “fascism” to brand any form of disagreement with their f**ckups. If anything, their “fascist” ploy should be greeted with hoots of derision and laughter. It’s on the same level as Preznit’s fondness for farting in the Oval Office.
Me, I would challenge Bush to spell “fascist” at a press conference.
tommy yum @ 77
I don’t see the two theories as necessarily exclusive. To a certain extent, the congenital nuttiness, sense of entitlement, and privileged connections could all contribute to her getting as far as she has - only to contribute even more to her ultimate de-stabilization when the “prize” disintegrates in her hands.
*ilbo @
63
Or how I spent my trust fund in soooo many beautiful ways.
astralplame (#70) –
I think of him as Christopher D(elirium) Tremens.
*xyz @ 89
How do you spell D E S P E R A T E ?
1,267 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ JUST GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
FDLers:
Now that things have gotten outta Rove’s control, we are seein’ the heavy hitters in the fascist party (i.e. Burns and Allen - that has a nice ring to it doesn’t it?!) throwin off their robes and shining up their jackboots. The tsunami that is buildin up in Rove’s swimmin’ pool has forced the bunch of ‘em to push forward the schedule.
The play in Iraq is clearly gunna be “stay the course” thru ‘08 and then impeach the next administration with “who lost Iraq?”. The move on Iran was gunna happen in early ‘07 but now is gunna be played in late October. The judicial nominees and assault on Social Security that was gunna happen in the Spring of ‘07 is gunna be pushed in this rump session of congress in order to keep the Democrats occupied as long as possible on domestic issues in Washington and outta their districts and states.
For those who are sanguine about the comin’ elections and who believe that all the Democrats hafta do is lay low…well, go read German history 1930-33.
History has presented our leaders and would-be leaders with a challenge…a moment when their actions must be first in defense of principle and truth even if it is against their own short-term political interest. So far the elected leadership of the House and senate have failed the test, failed us and failed history. When this period is written in historical scripture, Mrs. Clinton will be a minor footnote.
We can take nothing for granted and we must be ready to drag our leaders behind us when the fascists call us into the street.
KEEP THE FAITH, COURAGE IS SOMETHING YOU FIND WHEN YOU NEED IT!!