Last week, I wrote about the decision by Judge T.S. Ellis III to overturn the $10 million verdict against Custer Battles. It was decided on the grounds that the company ripped off the Coalition Provisional Authority, an entity independent of the United States government, thus the False Claims Act does not apply.
This week, on the heels of an appearance on The Colbert Report, Paul Krugman and his facial hair weighed in on the mercenaries that continue to undermine U.S. efforts in Iraq.
Yet Blackwater, whose chief executive is a big contributor to the Republican Party, continues to thrive. The Department of Homeland Security sent heavily armed Blackwater employees into New Orleans immediately after Katrina.
To whom are such contractors accountable? Last week, a judge threw out a jury’s $10 million verdict against Custer Battles, a private contractor that was hired, among other things, to provide security at Baghdad’s airport. Battles has become a symbol of the mix of cronyism, corruption and sheer amateurishness that doomed the Iraq adventure — and the judge didn’t challenge the jury’s finding that the company engaged in flagrant fraud.
[...]
Tax farmers, mercenaries and viceroys: Why does the Bush administration want to run a modern superpower as if it were a 16th-century monarchy? Maybe people who’ve spent their political careers denouncing government as the root of all evil can’t grasp the idea of governing well. Or maybe it’s cynical politics: Fiefdoms provide both an opportunity to evade accountability and to create a vast source of patronage. [emphasis added]
A 16th-century monarchy? The fundies are in bunches at the thought of one.
But this certainly points out one glaring head scratcher with regards to Rummy's attempts at modernizing the military. Since when was modernization tantamount to regression? As previous empires have learned the hard way, mercenaries are highly expensive and hard to control. Additionally, arm them with modern weapons, insert them in a volatile region in a media war with global communications, and you've got a serious problem on your hands.
Some people just never learn.
Mercenaries in Iraq have proved to be problematic, to put it nicely. And it doesn't help that the President and his rubberstamp crony Congress have protected these people from the very beginning.
Meanwhile, Jeremy Scahill from The Nation continued covering Blackwater for the publication, noting a three judge panel's decision to keep the wrongful death suit against the company in North Carolina courts. The families of the four slain in Fallujah in March 2004 and Blackwater tried to get it dismissed in federal court.
In its motion to dismiss the case in federal court, Blackwater argued that the families of the four men are entitled only to government insurance payments under the federal Defense Base Act. Many firms specializing in contractor law advertise the DBA as the best way for corporations servicing the war to avoid being sued. "What Blackwater is trying to do is to sweep all of their wrongful conduct into the Defense Base Act," says Miles. Blackwater spokesperson Chris Taylor told the Associated Press, "We are reviewing the decision."
Blackwater argued in its appeal that the four men "were performing a classic military function...with authorization from the Office of the Secretary of Defense that classified their missions as 'official duties' in support of the Coalition Provisional Authority" and therefore any court, federal or state, "may not impose liability for casualties sustained in the battlefield in the performance of these duties." In other words, because Blackwater was supporting the occupation with its forces, the company is immune from damages or lawsuits. The court said this argument "proves too much" to permit, saying Blackwater's "constitutional interpretations" were "too extravagantly recursive for us to accept."
The images of the charred bodies hanging from "Blackwater Bridge," as it is now known, sparked the massive assault on the city, killing 600 Iraqis. Soon the Abu Ghraib abuses would be unearthed and down the spiral we go on Bush's misadventure in Iraq.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Fitz.
Good to see you back, Matt O. At the end of the preceding thread, I guess this subject came up. Not the court case, just another aspect of this vast corporate conspiracy. peterr brought this Seattle PI article to our attention:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/.....ase24.html
WASHINGTON — In an ironic twist, legislation that would open up the murky world of government contracting to public scrutiny has been derailed by a secret parliamentary maneuver.
An unidentified senator placed a “secret hold” on legislation introduced by Sens. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Barack Obama, D-Ill., that would create a searchable database of government contracts, grants, insurance, loans and financial assistance, worth $2.5 trillion last year. The database would bring transparency to federal spending and be as simple to use as conducting a Google search.
interesting….
Matt O.!
Thanks Ed.
I’ve been pretty busy at work.
Actually, I don’t like my 16th C. monarchy.
I want my republic back!
Phillip V!
Louis XIV!
Henry VIII!
Ok, I’m kind of running out of 16th century monarchs here.
EPU’d from previous thread (I think) but in support of Jane:
I read Elliots hateful little stain of a piece at HufPo and commented this:
Also nice to see so many comments sticking up for Jane and telling Elliot to stuff it.
Jane? Elliot?
I’m missing something here. (Haven’t done much blog reading outside of local ones in recent days.)
Didn’t we lay a savage beat-down of monarchy at Yorktown? IIRC, didn’t we pop open a can of whup-ass and make those monarchist jackholes take a big ol’ swig of it at Yorktown? Do they not teach the kids about Yorktown anymore? Was Bush off doing a line of coke with some hookers when they covered Yorktown in history class at his fancy-pants elitocrat academy?
Actually, I don’t have a problem with Blackwater types hanging from bridges anywhere, anytime. Blackwater stuff is just another example of fascism on the march. 16th. century monarchy? Makes me feel so old continental. And British too. Hail, Czar George! Or should it be Heil George?
Soon it looks as if there will be a whole new theater of opportunity for those assholes — unless we stop them. Bolton, Bush and the Gang seem to be getting ready preparing to act alone on Iran sanctions, or worse. Sure sounds familiar — but what then? Unlike Iraq, Iran has plenty of ways to respond. Bring on the $10.00 gas…
Nobody believes the Coalition Provisional Authority is independent of the U. S. Government. It was set up by the U.S. Government to install its hand-picked puppet to look the other way as we looted the oil. Looks like the mercenaries want it both ways. Custer Battles gets off the hook as an entity independent from the U.S. Government but Blackwater gets to duck their liability citing the Defense Base Act.
Matt O. @ 7
Stephen Elliot at HuffPo calling out our dear Jane for writing that Holy Joe was campaigning with republicans.
OK Kiddo … and how do you feel about Mussolini’s demise ? (and Clara Petrella’s too)
cleter @ 8
I thought the Hessians were just part of the coalition of the willing. You mean they were mercenaries?
cleter @ 6
Louis XIV: 1638-1715
Philip V: 1683-1746
You did get one out of three.
Actually the Bush administration reminds me more of John I — a monarch who managed to piss off every one inside and outside his domain, all the while bringing his country to financial ruin.
With any luck the Dems taking back both houses of Congress in November will be the reenactment of forcing John to sign the Magna Carta.
Morris Sheppard @
15
And don’t forget Poland and General Pulaski!
lina @
17
I’m reminded of Yertle the Turtle, myself - “I’m king,” declared Yertle, “of all that I see, but I don’t see enough - that’s the trouble with me.”
lina - just hoping no Robin Hood times come
lina @ 16
Francis I and Medici-dominated descendance…
Charles V and Phillip II
Elizabeth I
At this point, I’d shove Bush into the wayback machine for an even swap, Mr Peabody. Even Bloody Mary Tudor.
From Scahill’s article:
What? Another bunch of judges who don’t think that “extravagant” constitutional interpretations hold water? Activists! Wait ’til Addington and Yoo hear about this!!
/snark
*ilson46201 @ 14
As to Benito’s rather painful, I assume, and abrupt departure? Well, after all, all politics is local. As to Clara Petrella… the only person by that name that rings a bell is the soprano. I am not aware of the circumstances of her demise.
Are you by chance referring to Mussolini’s mistress Clara Petacci?
Jim @ 21
Bush has a few things in common with Bloody Mary: religious fanaticism, intransigence and delusion, lots of needless death.
Well I personally am not fond of our 16th century monarchy at all. Even if Jane were our monarch, dressed like Queen Elizabeth I hehe. OK, well she would be tres posh, but I’d still not like it :)
When I think of things like this my blood starts boiling, and I start feeling evil thoughts. I’m sure a lot of you guys get the same way. Do something constructive when you feel like this.
Collect the general feedback emails of the MSM (CNN, MSNBC, etc)…and email them a complaint about their crappy lack of journalism. If you use Outlook, you can set up a mailing list, so you only have to enter the email addys once, and then the same email will go to all of them.
Email and call your Senators. Be polite. Be repetitive.
Personally I’m hammering them on normalized relations with Iran right now. It would change the whole dynamics in Neoconland if the conversation is turned from dropping nuclear bombs on Iran, to having talks with them instead.
These are things that the blogs are perfect for. We can direct large amounts of force with laser-precision at weak points in the Administration. Don’t feel angry. Don’t feel hopeless. Feel vindicated instead, when you participate in changing the conversation.
/em sermonizing off hehe
lina @
16
well, poop. I meant Phillip IV. And Louis XIII, of course. Heh. Look! Over there! Terror!
I’m now picturing Bush in that white face and red wig from all those Elizabeth R movies, for some reason he looks more like Bette Davis than Cate Blanchette or Glenda Jackson. Though I think any of the four would make better foreign policy than Dumbya
cleter @ 26
don’t mind me, I’m pedantic. it runs in the family.
Matt O. - Was wondering about you recently. Demanding job explains it. Anyway another fine post in a sorry chapter of the great experiment.
The two trillion dollar question is….
To whom are such contractors accountable?
Another question reporters should be standing at the front yard waiting to ask every day. Thankfully you are here.
Whose laws do these blackwater and other mercenaries operate under while in Iraq or Afghanistan while they are making their nest-eggs? there is a law on the books as of now that can hold them responsible til Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Gonzales et al yank it…
It’s about War Crimes…
Kurt - good point and don’t forget spotlight.
Several years ago there was some very serious reporting about the mercenaries - particularly the use of some of the most violent mercenaries from apartheid days - by the US. We really need to stay on this issue and bring that information back into the public eye.
Thanks Matt O for this post and for staying with it!
The legal situation of these mercenaries is very complicated, if I remember correctly. Does anyone know the current details?
cleter @ 9
The answers to your questions are: Yes; Yes; No; and Yes.
Want to kill people for good pay and no risk of a court marshall. Blackwater and Custer Battles is hiring.
MFI has been taking on this mercenary problem for a long while now, including the slave labor issue re the contractors.
http://gorillasguides.blogspot.....rward.html
Peterr @ 19
One of my favorite books, back in the 60s. Thanks for the memories, Peterr!
“So pile up more turtles!”
OT/
Funny, I don’t see this happening for any Repug.
Obama goes to Kenya
UptownNYChick @ 38
I heartily applaud him for taking a very public AIDS test and trying to help people of that ravaged country and the world.
Tell me again why Howard Dean does not hire Krugman to work for the National Democratic party????????????????????????????????????
I have yet to read a Paul Krugman article that was neither dead-on accurate nor simply and clearly written and explained.
This guy’s just a Princeton economics professor specializing in global economics? What a waste of talent.
clueless @ 40
I wouldn’t say that, Paul does a fine job of getting his accurate take published every week in the New York Times. And this is important, what with all the Richard Mellon Scaife funded propagandists driveling away.
Since when was modernization tantamount to regression?
Since the Clean Air initiave fucked up our air, the No Child Left Behind initiative left children beyond, etc. etc. etc.
Up is Down, Black is White, etc. etc. etc.
When are people going to figure this out?
So, let me get this straight:
Custer Battles gets off because the CPA was NOT an arm of the US Gov’t, so the plaintiffs had no standing to sue under US law.
Blackwater is claiming that they were working for the CPA, which WAS an arm of the US Gov’t, and therefore Blackwater’s liability is limited under US law.
Do I have it right?
cleter @
9
Not only Yorktown. The little dust-up in Paris a couple of years later had to do specifically with privatized government, i.e. tax collection. But to some people it’s as if these events have been kept secret.
Bloody Mary, or Mary Tudor should not be confused with Mary, Queen of Scots. They were I believe second cousins, but that’s it.
I wouldn’t say that, Paul does a fine job of getting his accurate take published every week in the New York Times.
Yeah, but not once the NYT instituted their Times Select. That cut out much of the online community that refused, like me, to pay the NYT any money to read their bullshit. So they did silence Krugman that way.
Jim Wilson @ 43
Jim Wilson:
It has been said that a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds. There is nothing foolish about your expectation of consistency. It is entirely appropriate. This is a matter that the appellate courts are going to have to sort out. I would feel much better about that fact if it had not been for 5 1/2 years of Bush appointments to the federal courts…
Oklahoma kiddo @ 45
I’m not confused. They had different last names:
Mary Tudor
Mary Stewart (or Stuart)
One was a scatter-brained victim.
One was a butcher.
…but personally, I think that the notion that Paul Bremer, the Coalition Provisional Authority and the contractors working for it were not arms of the U.S. government is absurd. Who sent them there?
How is this different than any other Republican attempt to change or curtail the advance of civil society?
Instead of progressive improvments we have massive devolution of society. Fraud and corruption are the norm. Criminal competition is standard in a race for the bottom.
Yesterday, Conspiracy Secretary posted about his dad, Subway Serenade. I have a post up here
http://howardempowered.blogspo.....light.html
In a later thread, Denise posted this:
I’ve been off blog for a few days and am distressed to hear about Subway.
As you know I work for a biotech and we do have a treatment for pancreatic cancer. I understand that there is a possilbe insurance issue.
I have many clinical oncology specialist friends in the NYC area that might be able to help David get this treatment if his doctors approve.
Can someone get the word out and give my contact info if his family is interestd? I’d hate to see this chance passed up if his situation is as dire as it seems.
Continued prayers to you and your family, David.
She sent me her contact information to pass along to Jason (ConSec), which I did. At least I sent it to the only address I have for him. I really want Denise to be able to connect with Subway’s family. I’m posting here because that’s where a lot of the commenters seemed to be coming from last night, posting notes for Subway. If anyone here knows how I might get in touch with his son, could you e-mail me at howardempowered (at) gmail.com. Thanks.
I’m not really following blogs today, because I have to much that needs tending around the house, so I don’t know if there’s been further comment on the matter or now.
Back to job applications, but I’ll be checking my e-mail.
King George The Decider!
Pah-leese.
Cesar Chelala, MD, PhD, winner of an Overseas Press Club of America award for an article on human rights says about Amnesty International’s severe criticism of Israel’s tactics in Lebanon: “Many of the actions described are war crimes, and those responsible are subject to criminal accountability anywhere in the world through the doctrine of universal jurisdiction.” Hizbullah leaders, Israeli leaders and many American leaders are war criminals. In my view.
lieberman retracts and endorses the democrats
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2....._0826.html
interesting
neurophius @ 49
Odd as this may sound, that “C” in CPA had some functional meaning. Civilian contracts were administered by the Brits in the southern areas where their military was the occupying force.
Paul Bremer got a paycheck, presumably. By whom was it signed? Jesus? What currency was it in? What bank was it drawn on? When he quit…to whom did he address his resignation? Jesus again?
Ok Kiddo - the call from Amnesty International is for investigations of all parties:
Amnesty International is calling for a comprehensive, independent and impartial inquiry to be urgently established by the UN into violations of international humanitarian law by both sides in the conflict. It should examine in particular the impact of this conflict on the civilian population, and should be undertaken with a view to holding individuals responsible for crimes under international law and ensuring that full reparation is provided to the victims.
I’m with you that I’d add US enablers to the list of targets of any investigation.
I’ve been reading Robert Fisk’s Pity the Nation about Lebanon (extremely recommended and available via the Amazon link on the FDL page) and it’s astonishing to see how closely the recent Israeli attacks mirror their earlier invasion of Lebanon. Fisk is clear that many parties were at fault then - as he also does in his reporting now - but the claim of Israel to some higher moral authority (similar to the US claims, eh?) are particularly disturbing and I’m very glad AI is calling them on it.
me to me says:
“lieberman retracts and endorses the democrats”
Lieberman really does think he can have it both ways. He was for the Democratic candidates before he was against* them. Now he is for them** after he was against* them. Maybe it depends on what time of day you ask the question.
*He was against them in the sense that he declared himself a “non-combatant,” and appeared with Republican candidates at an event that some observers saw as a campaign appearance.
** But what does being for them mean? He hopes they win? Is he going to refrain from any activities that may hurt their chances, such as doing GOTV among Republican voters? I doubt it.
lina @ 48
My comment was most assuredly not aimed at you lina. Never in a million years. It’s just that an awful lot of folks get the two Mary’s mixed up. It was just an FYI thing. Me mum was a Scot, and I remember the only time I got the two Mary’s mixed up as a kid. Boy, that is not a fond memory. Believe me.
ot, VERY IMPORTANT
FROM HERE
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0608/S00316.htm
FRANK RICH:
Were it not so tragic, Mr. Bush’s claim that he had never suggested a connection between the 9/11 attacks and Iraq would be as ludicrous as Bill Clinton’s doomed effort to draw a distinction between sex and oral sex. The tragedy is that the country ever believed Mr. Bush, particularly those Americans who were moved to enlist because of 9/11 and instead ended up fighting a war that the president now concedes had “nothing” to do with the 9/11 attacks.
http://select.nytimes.com/2006.....wanted=all
word.
Siun @ 57
Thank God for Amnesty International. In the face of all that’s wrong with the world, their work stands out as a small candle in a dark, vast cavern.
out from behind the NYT wall:
Return to the Scene of the Crime
By FRANK RICH
PRESIDENT BUSH travels to the Gulf Coast this week, ostensibly to mark the first anniversary of Hurricane Katrina. Everyone knows his real mission: to try to make us forget the first anniversary of the downfall of his presidency.
As they used to say in the French Quarter, bonne chance! The ineptitude bared by the storm — no planning for a widely predicted catastrophe, no attempt to secure a city besieged by looting, no strategy for anything except spin — is indelible. New Orleans was Iraq redux with an all-American cast. The discrepancy between Mr. Bush’s “heckuva job” shtick and the reality on the ground induced a Cronkite-in-Vietnam epiphany for news anchors. At long last they and the country demanded answers to the questions about the administration’s competence that had been soft-pedaled two years earlier when the war first went south.
What’s amazing on Katrina’s first anniversary is how little Mr. Bush seems aware of this change in the political weather. He’s still in a bubble. At last week’s White House press conference, he sounded as petulant as Tom Cruise on the “Today” show when Matt Lauer challenged him about his boorish criticism of Brooke Shields. Asked what Iraq had to do with the attack on the World Trade Center, Mr. Bush testily responded, “Nothing,” adding that “nobody has ever suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attacks.” Like the emasculated movie star, the president is still so infatuated with his own myth that he believes the public will buy such nonsense.
As the rest of the world knows, the White House connived 24/7 to pound in the suggestion that Saddam ordered the attacks on 9/11. “The Bush administration had repeatedly tied the Iraq war to Sept. 11,” Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton write in “Without Precedent,” their new account of their stewardship of the 9/11 commission. The nonexistent Qaeda-Saddam tie-in was as much a selling point for the war as the nonexistent W.M.D. The salesmanship was so merciless that half the country was brainwashed into believing that the 9/11 hijackers had been Iraqis.
To achieve this feat, Dick Cheney spent two years publicly hyping a “pretty well confirmed” (translation: unconfirmed) pre-9/11 meeting in Prague between Mohamed Atta and a Saddam intelligence officer, continuing to do so long after this specious theory had been discredited. Mr. Bush’s strategy was to histrionically stir 9/11 and Iraq into the same sentence whenever possible, before the invasion and after. Typical was his May 1, 2003, oration declaring the end of “major combat operations.” After noting that “the battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September 11th, 2001,” he added: “With those attacks, the terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States. And war is what they got.” To paraphrase the former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke, this was tantamount to saying that the Japanese attacked us on Dec. 7, 1941, and war with Mexico is what they got.
Were it not so tragic, Mr. Bush’s claim that he had never suggested a connection between the 9/11 attacks and Iraq would be as ludicrous as Bill Clinton’s doomed effort to draw a distinction between sex and oral sex. The tragedy is that the country ever believed Mr. Bush, particularly those Americans who were moved to enlist because of 9/11 and instead ended up fighting a war that the president now concedes had “nothing” to do with the 9/11 attacks.
A representative and poignant example, brought to light by The Los Angeles Times, is Patrick R. McCaffrey, a Silicon Valley auto-body-shop manager with two children who joined the California National Guard one month after 9/11. He was eager to do his bit for homeland security by helping protect the Shasta Dam or Golden Gate Bridge. Instead he was sent to Iraq, where he was killed in 2004. In a replay of the Pentagon subterfuge surrounding the friendly-fire death of Pat Tillman, another post-9/11 enlistee betrayed by his country, Mr. McCaffrey’s death was at first officially attributed to an ambush by insurgents. Only after two years of investigation did the Army finally concede that his killers were actually the Iraqi security forces he was helping to train.
“He said we had no business in Iraq and should not be there,” his mother, Nadia McCaffrey, told the paper. Last week’s belated presidential admission that Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks on America that inspired Patrick McCaffrey’s service was implicitly an admission that he and many like him died in Iraq for nothing as well.
Mr. Bush’s press-conference disavowalof his habitual efforts to connect 9/11 to Saddam will be rolled back by the White House soon enough. When the fifth anniversary of 9/11 arrives in two weeks, you can bet that the president will once again invoke the Qaeda attacks to justify the Iraq war, especially now that we are adding troops (through the involuntary call-up of reservists) rather than subtracting any. The new propaganda strategy will be right out of Lewis Carroll: If we leave the country that had nothing to do with 9/11, then 9/11 will happen again.
But before we get to that White House P.R. offensive, there is next week’s Katrina show. It has its work cut out for it. A year after the storm, the reconstruction of New Orleans echoes our reconstruction of Baghdad. A “truth squad” of House Democrats has cataloged the “waste, fraud, abuse or mismanagement” in $8.75 billion worth of contracts, most of which were awarded noncompetitively. Only 60 percent of the city has electricity. Half of the hospitals and three-quarters of the child-care centers remain closed. Violent crime is on the rise. Less than half of the population has returned.
How do you pretty up this picture? As an opening act, Mr. Bush met on Wednesday with Rockey Vaccarella, a Katrina survivor who with much publicity drove a “replica” of a FEMA trailer from New Orleans to Washington to seek an audience with the president. No Cindy Sheehan bum’s rush for him. Mr. Bush granted his wish and paraded him before the press. That was enough to distract the visitor from his professed message to dramatize the unfinished job on the Gulf. Instead Mr. Vaccarella effusively thanked the president for “the millions of FEMA trailers” complete with air-conditioning and TV. “You know, I wish you had another four years, man,” he said. “If we had this president for another four years, I think we’d be great.”
The CNN White House correspondent, Ed Henry, loved it. “Hollywood couldn’t have scripted this any better, a gritty guy named Rockey slugging it out, trying to realize his dream and getting that dream realized against all odds,” he said. He didn’t ask how this particular Rockey, a fast-food manager who lost everything a year ago, financed this mission or so effortlessly pulled it off. It was up to bloggers and Democrats to report shortly thereafter that Mr. Vaccarella had run as a Republican candidate for the St. Bernard Parish commission in 1999. It was up to Iris Hageney of Gretna, La., to complain on the Times-Picayune Web site that the episode was “a huge embarrassment” that would encourage Americans to “forget the numerous people who still don’t have trailers or at least one with electricity or water.”
That is certainly the White House game plan as it looks toward the president’s two-day return to the scene of the crime. Just as it brought huge generators to floodlight Mr. Bush’s prime-time recovery speech in Jackson Square a year ago — and then yanked the plug as soon as he was done — so it will stop at little to bathe this anniversary in the rosiest possible glow.
Douglas Brinkley, the Tulane University historian who wrote the best-selling account of Katrina, “The Great Deluge,” is worried that even now the White House is escaping questioning about what it is up to (and not) in the Gulf. “I don’t think anybody’s getting the Bush strategy,” he said when we talked last week. “The crucial point is that the inaction is deliberate — the inaction is the action.” As he sees it, the administration, tacitly abetted by New Orleans’s opportunistic mayor, Ray Nagin, is encouraging selective inertia, whether in the rebuilding of the levees (“Only Band-Aids have been put on them”), the rebuilding of the Lower Ninth Ward or the restoration of the wetlands. The destination: a smaller city, with a large portion of its former black population permanently dispersed. “Out of the Katrina debacle, Bush is making political gains,” Mr. Brinkley says incredulously. “The last blue state in the Old South is turning into a red state.”
Perhaps. But with no plan for salvaging either of the catastrophes on his watch, this president can no sooner recover his credibility by putting on an elaborate show of sermonizing and spin this week than Mr. Cruise could levitate his image by jumping up and down on Oprah’s couch. While the White House’s latest screenplay may have been conceived as “Mission Accomplished II,” what we’re likely to see play out in New Orleans won’t even be a patch on “Mission: Impossible III.”
Not to split hairs, but Lieberman didn’t retract. Gerstein is doing damage control - a continuation of the cr*p he was blathering on Friday…
“On Saturday, a Lieberman campaign aide called to offer a clarification for this article,” reports the Times. “The aide, Dan Gerstein, said that the senator had endorsed all the Democratic candidates for the House and still hoped they would win.”
“Mr. Gerstein said, however, that in light of their endorsement of Mr. Lamont, the senator did not expect the Democrats to ask him to campaign with them this fall,” the article continued.”
————-
The fact is, Lieberman said what he said and did what he did and there’s no taking it back.
CPA:
top U.S. military reported TO them. ya wanna tell me they were independent of our govt?
busy here w family stuff, all good.
please:
1-save the vote/take back the congress
2-NO WAR AGAINST IRAN. cannot overemphasize this
3-take care of each other and push back personally to make yrselves stronger.
that is all. back to fam.
——————-egregious
From Crooks and Liars, Hastert nullifies congressional election
I wouldn’t count on the dems ‘winning’ the house, I think if the stakes were high enough to ‘fix’ the elections to get George in, the stakes are certainly high enough now to warrant every dirty trick necessary to keep congress from becoming a danger to the ‘unitary executive’.
oh and ((((CHS good health))))
precious time w the little one. so soon gone…baby is 19…
me to me @ 60
They’re not supposed to be doing this shit in California any more:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/arti.....GKPR41.DTL
When I go to vote in November, and nothing has been done to change those machines, I’m going to make a very ugly scene. Look for me on the evening news.
Sophist @ 66
Has anyone sent this to the Laesch campaign?
OT- egregious- I sent you an email yesterday- did you get it? Maybe I had the wrong addy. Been thinking about you.
Matt O.!!!! Hello and the best to you- BTW, have you changed day jobs?
The Nefarious Leslie @ 69
Done.
At one point Steve Clemons was writing about a year ago about highup sources giving him inside info, he said they were concerned about what had already happened but were much more concerned about THE NEXT BIG THING.
Needed to read between the lines a little, but that plus the outspoken generals makes the case. I asked my military friend was it important about the 6 (now 7) generals speaking against gov’t policy, answer HUGE.
The neocons are trying to run their propaganda once again, to send our sons and daughters to slaughter once again, and for the good of *IPAC?
Why should we?
Caring for the victims of WWII should not translate into creating tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, and if the neocon match lands in gasoline, MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WILL DIE if the war with Iran gets going.
This is confirmed by my diplomat/Democratic party high official who says ATTACKING IRAN IS A MISTAKE THEY WILL BE TALKING ABOUT FOR THE NEXT 500 YEARS.
Let’s not go down this path, shall we?
Can intelligent people work together to prevent the next Dark Ages?
“When I go to vote in November, and nothing has been done to change those machines, I’m going to make a very ugly scene. Look for me on the evening news.”
I’m with ya Lina. I threw a complete shitfit when I demanded proof on paper of who I voted for here in Utah.
Evening News indeed.
From - Congressional Election Nullified – Nobody Noticed
Almost a dollar a vote for a recount !!
btw - one small victory for the will of the voters! Patricia Todd, the lesbian running for Congress in Alabama, won at her hearing today… From the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund:
A good blow-by-blow is provided by the Birmingham Blues here
Bush is coming to Utah next week.
Yeah. “Everybody” can attend. I’ll be putting that to the test and keeping you posted.
http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_4242195
Thanks, Teddy!
egregoius - Just like the last couple of Iraq invasions. So many folks didn’t really think it would happen or didn’t think it through.
Bush attacking Iran (imo) should be treated as a certainty without opposition in advance of the people and congress. I don’t think a negative Nov. election will stop him.
this topic makes my blood boil. utimately this kind of corrution ends up poisoning the troops. Who wouldn’t be bitter and start trying to , “get some of the pie”?
Thanks for the great post Matt O
Eureka Springs, AR @ 79
in fact, as a total lame duck, he will be emboldened to do even more insane things. Not to mention what Crazy Dick Cheney might have in store for the universe.
Christ, where are the superheroes when you need them? We need a bat signal or something.
In Hollywood, someone would save us from these crazies. Here in reality, we’re fucked.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 45
Strange, I always thought Bloody Mary was a drink.
shooogarp @ 74, kick@ss and take names!
Yeah. “Everybody” can attend. I’ll be putting that to the test and keeping you posted.
orangejumpsuit @ 82
4 parts catholic to 1 part protestant.
ignite.
Mod - might need a snip & link @ 63.
Egregious!
normally an item like 63 should be linked BUT its behind a ‘locked door’ so it stands. Its not a recognized and accepted thing to do normally but is available for our pleasure. NYTimes lawyers, please dont sue!
*ilson46201 @ 86
Sorry - distract from the B’Party upstairs. H’BDay dude! What is it - 39?
Valley Girl @ 70
Hey VG– have been out of town w family stuff. Thx for the love [typed ‘live’] much needed. Will pickup email upon return to SENATOR WEBB territory…
NO NEOCON WAR OF AGGRESSION AGAINST IRAN. IT’S AGAINST GENEVA. CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY like bombing Lebanon civilian targets. Water purification plant…sure…because ‘terrorists’ drink water…WAR CRIMES. THE HAGUE. JUSTICE.