<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lieberman to Campaign With Republicans Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/24/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/24/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:58:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sooner Thought &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Great Post on Lieberman Screwing Up Our Majority</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/24/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-273087</link>
		<dc:creator>Sooner Thought &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Great Post on Lieberman Screwing Up Our Majority</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/23/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-273087</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[…] Now,  Ned Lamont would be a secure Democrat and a certain vote for Harry Reid.  He is within striking distance of Lieberman in the polls, and the momentum is all on his side.  There is absolutely no reason for the Democrats not to come down hard on Lieberman and put all their money and resouces behind Ned if what they really want to do is secure control of the Senate; Joe is way too thin-skinned to handle that kind of opposition, and despite his bent for necking with the GOP, his race would crumble in the wake of his own brittle ego. […]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Now,  Ned Lamont would be a secure Democrat and a certain vote for Harry Reid.  He is within striking distance of Lieberman in the polls, and the momentum is all on his side.  There is absolutely no reason for the Democrats not to come down hard on Lieberman and put all their money and resouces behind Ned if what they really want to do is secure control of the Senate; Joe is way too thin-skinned to handle that kind of opposition, and despite his bent for necking with the GOP, his race would crumble in the wake of his own brittle ego. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix Woman</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/24/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-261462</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/23/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-261462</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thing is, they were breaking ground on the $600 million housing project BEFORE the pro-forma insertion of Groton onto the BRAC list.  The fact that Groton got a near-unamious thumbs up WRT BRAC shows that it was not in danger then and it’s not in danger now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As he mentioned in somebody’s pro-Joe diary over at DKos, Pachacutec’s been talking to various DC pols and insiders about this and they’re all in shock that Holy Joe’s using the pretext of “saving” a non-endangered sub base to justify doing a photo-op campaign appearance with two GOP Congressional candidates eager to distance themselves from Bush, and who are looking to Holy Joe to give them the fake “feint to the center”.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thing is, they were breaking ground on the $600 million housing project BEFORE the pro-forma insertion of Groton onto the BRAC list.  The fact that Groton got a near-unamious thumbs up WRT BRAC shows that it was not in danger then and it’s not in danger now.</p>
<p>As he mentioned in somebody’s pro-Joe diary over at DKos, Pachacutec’s been talking to various DC pols and insiders about this and they’re all in shock that Holy Joe’s using the pretext of “saving” a non-endangered sub base to justify doing a photo-op campaign appearance with two GOP Congressional candidates eager to distance themselves from Bush, and who are looking to Holy Joe to give them the fake “feint to the center”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Chusid</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/24/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-261437</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Chusid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/23/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-261437</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Per the above comment, reviewing the media reports it is somewhere in the middle. Thes was a staged PR event and this time of year to call such a thing a campaign event is legitimate. I’ve only seen mention of Lieberman but none of the other Democrats who were involved in this last year being present. There are Republicans quoted saying favorable things about Lieberman.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is some ambiguity, but there is enough there to call this “campaigning with Republicans.” It adds to what we already knew–that Lieberman is the Republican-preferred candidate in this race.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Beyond that, this is far from the strongest case against Lieberman. It’s not enough, by itself, to use to call for things like removal of Lieberman’s seniority. There’s enough ambiguity in this being a state event to give Lieberman cover. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s not that terribly significant a thing,  but I did wind up in a debate over this after I linked to this at my blog, Liberal Values. The discussion is at:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=141#comments&quot;&gt;http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=141#comments&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per the above comment, reviewing the media reports it is somewhere in the middle. Thes was a staged PR event and this time of year to call such a thing a campaign event is legitimate. I’ve only seen mention of Lieberman but none of the other Democrats who were involved in this last year being present. There are Republicans quoted saying favorable things about Lieberman.</p>
<p>There is some ambiguity, but there is enough there to call this “campaigning with Republicans.” It adds to what we already knew–that Lieberman is the Republican-preferred candidate in this race.</p>
<p>Beyond that, this is far from the strongest case against Lieberman. It’s not enough, by itself, to use to call for things like removal of Lieberman’s seniority. There’s enough ambiguity in this being a state event to give Lieberman cover. </p>
<p>It’s not that terribly significant a thing,  but I did wind up in a debate over this after I linked to this at my blog, Liberal Values. The discussion is at:<br />
<a href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=141#comments">http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=141#comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralphbon</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/24/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-261337</link>
		<dc:creator>ralphbon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/23/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-261337</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OK, it’s now the day after yesterday. What are the CT newspapers saying about yesterday’s Groton event? Did it in any way resemble the “campaigning with Republicans” description? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I suspect it comes down, Clinton-like, to what the meaning of “with” is.  Here in New York, if you’re running for office, you attend the Salute to Israel parade or risk being smeared as a latent or blatant anti-Semite.  And if politicians of the other party do the same, you could technically be considered as campaigning “with” them, but let’s get real. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I suspect it’s the same deal with the Groton event.  The Groton base is as sacred a local cow in CT as Israel is in NYC.  Did Lieberman appear “with” Republicans in the Salute to Israel sense or, as Jane insinuated, in the lending-support sense?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If she made too much of this, she could acknowledge such openly and move on. Holy Joe is sufficiently odious without any added hype.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, it’s now the day after yesterday. What are the CT newspapers saying about yesterday’s Groton event? Did it in any way resemble the “campaigning with Republicans” description? </p>
<p>I suspect it comes down, Clinton-like, to what the meaning of “with” is.  Here in New York, if you’re running for office, you attend the Salute to Israel parade or risk being smeared as a latent or blatant anti-Semite.  And if politicians of the other party do the same, you could technically be considered as campaigning “with” them, but let’s get real. </p>
<p>I suspect it’s the same deal with the Groton event.  The Groton base is as sacred a local cow in CT as Israel is in NYC.  Did Lieberman appear “with” Republicans in the Salute to Israel sense or, as Jane insinuated, in the lending-support sense?</p>
<p>If she made too much of this, she could acknowledge such openly and move on. Holy Joe is sufficiently odious without any added hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cugel</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/24/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-261202</link>
		<dc:creator>Cugel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/23/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-261202</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-259667&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;steve duncan @&lt;br /&gt;
                               40              &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;51 votes. If a Lieberman win assures them 51 seats Schumer, Reid, Clinton and Obama would all blow the S.O.B. on alternating days for a month after the election. Don’t believe any crap about Joe getting put on some sort of shit list or being booted from the party. 51 votes. That’s ALL that matters. Today’s Dems are a cesspool of cowardly invertebrates. LBJ would’ve taken Lieberman aside and informed him defying the party meant he was soon to be the most miserable bastard roaming the halls of Congress. He’d have to swim a stream of shit just to get to his desk. No chance for that type of enforcement with this crew.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What gave LBJ power was the seniority system. There weren’t all those sub-committees for every day of the week so every Senator can preside over something. In the old days the leadership had the kind of power that only the Republicans now wield and nobody crossed the party line or they’d get a call from Sam Rayburn or LBJ. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The democratic caucus today is like a band of headless chickens running in every direction. None of them can ever resist the urge to put both feet firmly in their mouths, usually on national TV. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s just sad how spinelessly useless they all are. As Teddy Roosevelt said “You can’t carve a man with backbone out of a banana.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-259667"><em>steve duncan @<br />
                               40              </em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>51 votes. If a Lieberman win assures them 51 seats Schumer, Reid, Clinton and Obama would all blow the S.O.B. on alternating days for a month after the election. Don’t believe any crap about Joe getting put on some sort of shit list or being booted from the party. 51 votes. That’s ALL that matters. Today’s Dems are a cesspool of cowardly invertebrates. LBJ would’ve taken Lieberman aside and informed him defying the party meant he was soon to be the most miserable bastard roaming the halls of Congress. He’d have to swim a stream of shit just to get to his desk. No chance for that type of enforcement with this crew.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What gave LBJ power was the seniority system. There weren’t all those sub-committees for every day of the week so every Senator can preside over something. In the old days the leadership had the kind of power that only the Republicans now wield and nobody crossed the party line or they’d get a call from Sam Rayburn or LBJ. </p>
<p>The democratic caucus today is like a band of headless chickens running in every direction. None of them can ever resist the urge to put both feet firmly in their mouths, usually on national TV. </p>
<p>It’s just sad how spinelessly useless they all are. As Teddy Roosevelt said “You can’t carve a man with backbone out of a banana.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thucydides Jr.</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/24/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-261130</link>
		<dc:creator>Thucydides Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 04:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/23/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-261130</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Leftofliberal, I emailed the DCC and got a polite stiff-arm saying that the DCC is only concerned about House races. I then reiterated (as I noted in my first message) that his Senate bid is hurting Dem House races.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also noted it was worrisome I had to point this out to them, and that I had hoped that were smarter than that. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Guess not.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leftofliberal, I emailed the DCC and got a polite stiff-arm saying that the DCC is only concerned about House races. I then reiterated (as I noted in my first message) that his Senate bid is hurting Dem House races.</p>
<p>I also noted it was worrisome I had to point this out to them, and that I had hoped that were smarter than that. </p>
<p>Guess not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalD</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/24/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-261026</link>
		<dc:creator>CalD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 02:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/23/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-261026</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh wait. I get it. Thanks PhoenixLady, for posting the AP clip. That clears things up considerably. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FYI, Groton was on the chopping block in the Base Realignment and Closure thing last year or the year before. Keeping it open was pretty huge for CT’s economy and a major accomplishment on the part of their entire congressional delegation (Dem’s and Repub’s). So if they’re breaking ground for new housing down there now, I guess they’ve got a right to crow about it a little.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wait. I get it. Thanks PhoenixLady, for posting the AP clip. That clears things up considerably. </p>
<p>FYI, Groton was on the chopping block in the Base Realignment and Closure thing last year or the year before. Keeping it open was pretty huge for CT’s economy and a major accomplishment on the part of their entire congressional delegation (Dem’s and Repub’s). So if they’re breaking ground for new housing down there now, I guess they’ve got a right to crow about it a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalD</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/24/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-260989</link>
		<dc:creator>CalD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 02:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/23/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-260989</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Onset of Alzheimer’s, perhaps…?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was kind a relief for me to hear though. I was sore afraid Lamont was going to have to run against a sane Joe Lieberman. But Lieberman can’t win without a sizable chunk of the Democratic vote. There just aren’t enough Republicans in CT to make up the difference if the Dem vote goes over overwhelmingly for Lamont. And I seriously doubt this kind of behavior is going to further endear Mr. Lieberman to Democrats in any way.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Onset of Alzheimer’s, perhaps…?</p>
<p>This was kind a relief for me to hear though. I was sore afraid Lamont was going to have to run against a sane Joe Lieberman. But Lieberman can’t win without a sizable chunk of the Democratic vote. There just aren’t enough Republicans in CT to make up the difference if the Dem vote goes over overwhelmingly for Lamont. And I seriously doubt this kind of behavior is going to further endear Mr. Lieberman to Democrats in any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reno and Its Discontents&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Lieberman Getting Ready To Punk Democrats Again?</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/24/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-260956</link>
		<dc:creator>Reno and Its Discontents&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Lieberman Getting Ready To Punk Democrats Again?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 02:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/23/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-260956</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[…] Today, Lieberman campaigned with Republicans and the netroots/nutroots (depending on your sympathies) are demanding that Lieberman be stripped of his Senate committee assignments since he now seems to have fully relinquished his status as a Democrat. A story in The Hill suggested that this would be the case, but Lieberman says he’s been assured by Reid that he would retain his committee seniority. From the Journal Inquirer: Lieberman told the Associated Press the day after The Hill’s story was published that he had spoken with Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid and that Reid had assured him he would retain his positions within the party caucus should he win in November. […]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Today, Lieberman campaigned with Republicans and the netroots/nutroots (depending on your sympathies) are demanding that Lieberman be stripped of his Senate committee assignments since he now seems to have fully relinquished his status as a Democrat. A story in The Hill suggested that this would be the case, but Lieberman says he’s been assured by Reid that he would retain his committee seniority. From the Journal Inquirer: Lieberman told the Associated Press the day after The Hill’s story was published that he had spoken with Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid and that Reid had assured him he would retain his positions within the party caucus should he win in November. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purvis ames</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/24/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-260775</link>
		<dc:creator>purvis ames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/23/lieberman-to-campaign-with-republicans-today/#comment-260775</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Next time check the facts. This kind of thing won’t do Lamont any good.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next time check the facts. This kind of thing won’t do Lamont any good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
