~~ Sec. 9-60. Discretionary erasure or exclusion from enrollment list for lack of good-faith party affiliation; citation and hearing. Whenever the registrar of voters of any political party, [] is of the opinion that any person on the enrollment list, [] is not [] in good faith a member of, that political party and does not intend to support its principles or candidates, such registrar [] shall cite such person to appear before him and [] to show cause why his name should not be erased or excluded from such enrollment list.

So…doesn’t it follow that any “person on the enrollment list”, including the other Connecticut “Democrats” in office who have voiced their support for Not-A-Democrat Lieberman, and who have not given “their support” to the duly elected Democratic “candidate” Ned Lamont, also get their names taken off the Democratic “list”? These undemocratic Democrats clearly show a…”lack of good-faith party affiliation” and “do not intend to support its principles or candidates”.

This common-sense statute should be absorbed by the national Democratic Party who have some members who don’t seem to get the concept (yet).

Rick B @
57
How about “Little Lord Lieberman”?
http://simonsays.com/assets/is…..869940.jpg

DING DING DING DING DING!!!

I think we have a winner!

I’m happy to say this mistake has been corrected, and he is now no longer listed at all:

link

Is Bret Baier the New “Jeff Gannon”? http://www.democrats.com/why-w…..bret-baier

Michael Barone gives the game away:

We have always had our covert enemies, but their numbers were few until the 1960s. But then the elite young men who declined to serve in the military during the Vietnam War set out to write a narrative in which they, rather than those who obeyed the call to duty, were the heroes.
They have propagated their ideas through the universities, the schools and mainstream media to the point that they are the default assumptions of millions.

Indeed…’Elite young men’ such as George W. Bush, Richard “Dick” Cheney, Karl Rove, Paul Wolfowitz, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Richard Perle, John Bolton, Elliot Abrams, Tom DeLay, Dennis Hastert, Newt Gingrich, Phil Gramm, Alan Keyes, Michael Ledeen, Tony Snow, Rush Limbaugh, Brit Hume, Bill O’Reilly, Roger Ailes, Pat Robertson…

And Joe Lieberman.

;>)

I think that every chance the Lamont campaign has to speak about Lieberman, they should refer to him as “Connecticut for Lieberman Candidate Lieberman.” Calling him “my opponent,” “Joe,” or “Mr. Lieberman” don’t brand Joe as the whiney loser he is, and which Connecticut voters need to have embedded in their collective subconscious as they head toward the polls in November.

Or, maybe just the “Lieberman for Lieberman candidate?” …since we don’t really want to imply that CT really is for Lieberman.

How about “Little Lord Lieberman”?

Sounds like a job for Darkblack.