
[This afternboon's guest poster is Matt Browner Hamlin. Matt blogs at Emboldened and Bring it On, and was a key part of the delivery of a copy of Crashing the Gate to every Democrat in Congress. Back then he posted under his former pseudonym, "Philo," and he tells me he's cut his hair since his prime time appearance in this video. More recently, he's been helping Tim Tagaris with the netroots operation of the Ned Lamont campaign. Matt's also been a key architect of the continuing development of the Roots Project. We're delighted to have him guide our conversation about this excellent book today. -- Pachacutec]
A common thread running through analyses of the current American politics is that progressive change will only come when the barriers preventing regular people from participating in the democratic process are lowered. Bloggers are proving that self-published commentary can influence political discourse in Washington and capture the zeitgeist outside of Washington. The blogosphere has increased its capacity to drive traditional media coverage by out-working and out-thinking journalists. Vloggers like Spazeboy, CT Bob, and CTBlogger are pioneering a new dimension of People-Powered Media by using YouTube to publicize interactions between citizens and candidates.
But not everyone is a blogger and it would be profoundly short-sighted to look at recent blogospheric successes and declare the tactical manual for progressive change complete. Efforts like the Roots Project are striving to turn online organizing capacities into offline actions, but the need for change is systemic. We must work for change not just in Washington or our state houses, but on our school boards, PTAs, church groups, and zoning commissions.
50 Simple Things You Can Do to Fight the Right provides progressives with an extensive handbook of tactics, techniques, and strategies to incorporate movement activism into your daily, offline life. Less a polemic than a catalogue of ways to promote change, John Javna breaks down the book into simple actions and vignettes about why we fight for progressive values. Though I read 50 Simple Things in normal sequence like any other book, it lends itself well to browsing and should be kept ready-to-hand for easy use.
Each action is prefaced by a quote or statistic that frames the discussion. Background information and a series of simple things you can do and resources to use when doing them are provided for all fifty actions. Action #25, "Just Show Up," is prefaced by a quote that should be tattooed into blog tag-lines by the thousands:
"The world is run by those who show up." –Ron Nehring, Vice-Chairman of the Califronia Republican Party …
SIMPLE THINGS YOU CAN DO
Show up! You have the power at public meetings–all you have to do is stand up and speak. In fact, just being there makes a difference. "Without oversight," one activist says, "things slip by; the government can make important decisions without citizens knowing it. But if there’s just one person or reporter there, officials have to be careful about what they’re doing." The flip side: By not showing up, you abdicate your power as a citizen.
Javna’s message of participation is important for the blogosphere to hear. If you’re reading this you’re probably already politically activated. But reading and writing online won’t stop right wing activists from putting intelligent design textbooks into high school curricula or passing ordinances the restrict public protests. We need to be willing to get off the computer and participate in all aspects of the American democratic project (think of Chris Bowers running for a spot on the Pennsylvania State Democratic Committee as an example, not an exception).
While the actions Javna puts forward are interesting and useful, the most compelling passages in 50 Simple Things are from the "Why We Fight" sections. These sections discuss the underlying progressive values that give us reason to find new ways to fight against the Right. Here’s Javna’s number one reason why progressives fight; I’m quoting it in full because it sets the tone for his entire project:
1. We need to stand up for what we believe in. Progressive values are under attack…and if we don’t fight for them, who will? In this case "fighting" means committed action, not necessarily conflict–a willingness to sacrifice and a determination to overcome obstacles.
Of course, "fight the Right" does imply we’re fighting against something rather than for it. But under the circumstances, it’s hard to separate the two. Like it or not, if we want to achieve our vision of a progressive America, we have to take on the Radical Right.
The Right is open about the fact that they’d like to make liberals and liberal ideas a thing of the past. "I tell people don’t kill all the liberals," Rush Limbaugh once said to his audience. "Leave enough around so we can have two on every campus–living fossils–so we will never forget what these people stood for."
That’s the kind of thinking we’re up against.
"One lesson about democracy stands out above all others," comments one thoughtful progressive. "Bullies…cannot be appeased. They have to be opposed with a stubbornness that matches their own." And that’s why, at least for now, standing up for what we believe in means fighting the Right.
I think Javna includes the Why We Fight sections because too often our reactive campaigns against regressive Republican policies and politicians don’t take the time to say why we’re doing what we do. Our beliefs are part of a tradition that grows from the ideals that compelled our founding fathers to fight for America. Explicitly recognizing what we care about helps ground our efforts to promote change in a history of successful progressive activism, one that is responsible for equal rights for women and minorities, social security, and the weekend.. I agree with Javna, though, that part of our dedication to progressive change comes from a recognition of the threat the Right poses to the survival of things like workers rights, environmental rights, free speech, and reproductive rights. We wouldn’t have to fight now if the Right wasn’t working night and day to undo the progress our predecessors made over the last 150 years.
A largely unspoken message in 50 Simple Things is that all progressives are in this fight together. The book references hundreds of organizations and websites that can be used in the fight against the Right. Beyond their discrete usefulness for a particular action, giving recognition to the people who working on each particular issue reveals an ethic of supporting allies in the progressive movement whenever possible. Many people are committed to keeping America great; we can increase our collective strength by acknowledging the work others are doing. The more people working together for change support each other, the further their efforts can go.
I want to steer the discussion of 50 Simple Things in two general directions. The book includes fifty ways to fight the right (duh), but this is by no means an exhaustive list. What tricks do you use to counteract right wing propaganda? What guerilla tactics do you use to push progressive change? What do you do to leave your mark on American democracy? This discussion can provide a space for adding to our repertoire of actions beyond what Javna provides.
I also want to hear about why you’re involved in this movement from progressive change and against the radically regressive agenda of today’s Republican Party. Why do you fight? Why are you an activist? I look at this community and see thousands of concerned citizens who are dedicated to protecting a very particular vision of America. I want to know why the course of American politics matters to you. Most importantly, how does what you value give you strength to continue to work for change around America?
Related posts:
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Michael Huttner and Jason Salzman, 50 Ways You Can Help Obama Change America
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Dahr Jamail, The Will to Resist: Soldiers Who Refuse to Fight in Iraq and Afghanistan
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Jurgen Todenhofer, Why Do You Kill?: The Untold Story of the Iraqi Resistance
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Jill Richardson, Recipe for America: Why Our Food System is Broken and What We Can Do to Fix It
- McCaskill on Health Care: “This Will be a Fight and it Will be an Ugly Fight”





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

As is our custom in the Book Salon, please confine the discussion in this thread to the topic at hand. Other off-topic conversation should please continue in the comment thread below.
Next week, author John Javna will be joining us for Part II of this book discussion, so please be sure to come back again next Sunday!
Hi MATT and PACH
I really got excited when I read the book. I’ve had conversations with the editor of our denomination’s magazine and will be writing an article for it.
The one hitch in religious circles is overcoming the “partisan” thinking and language in order for it to pass muster.
Thanks for asking me to help facilitate this discussion Pach. Glad to be here!
Pach — sent you an e-mail, urgent.
I’ve now bought 6 copies. Given out 4 so far—one to our guy in Kerry’s office, one to my state rep. one to the head of the dem. town committee.
I see this as a useful tool in my line to get moribund social action/justice committees off their usual routines and doing things. It’s a great way to get folks involved at several levels, especially since John laid it out with 3 different “energy levels” of activists in mind.
scarecrow @
4
Watching for it; nothing yet.
I got this book about 2 months ago, and I can attest to its greatness!
Sorry for the server problems. We isoltaed it to a database issue, but still need to find theb root cause and cure.
The Tubes are eating comments! The Lieberman campaign strikes back!
Sorry for the server problems. We isolated it to a database issue, but still need to find the root cause and cure.
Matt Browner-Hamlin @ 9
I didn’t think they had the tech know how to do such a thing. They are totally incompetent Wankers. And WATBs too.
Small party, clogged toobz. what a disappointment.
tube-on, apply directly to the tubes
tube-on, apply directly to the tubes
tube-on, apply directly to the tubes
MATT!! FITZ!!
I’ve found that by reading the news with an eye for action items has helped me a lot. By taking a step past commentary to consider whether a letter to the editor or to Congress would help has transformed my own blogging (with Matt) into a more action-focused effort. I’ve received letters and emails from multiple Senators and Reps. and will be meeting soon with my local Rep. in Boston to introduce him to the blogosphere.
So there’s my tip: keep thinking about action. Using 50 Things can provide guidance on your options.
I am the Chair for our county DFA chapter, at our August 2nd Meeting 50 Ways was the main topic of our meeting and using the items in the book to organize actions. One of our local Air America talk show hosts attended and now I am hearing items from the book coming out.
I directed meeting attendees to join the book discussions here on the blog. The book is a great tool for organizers to provide action items for our groups. One of the thing that makes them feel empowered is the ability to Do something that actually effects change.
So many people feel powerless or that what they do, the hundreds of emails, faxes and letters just fall into a big black hole.
Any ideas on what we can do to generate more buzz about the book?
I came back from Ykos and dropped the obligatory swag bag in a corner of my office. Then I jumped right into two more events and didn’t look at it again until the State Roots Project suggested reading 50 Simple Things.
It does a great job in getting the creative juices flowing by identifying some contemporary grassroots success stories and providing resources to help adapt them for specific local efforts. Thanks, Matt and Pach, for recommending it.
If the toobz will permit, I’ll add some additional comments in little bit.
Temporary tubal ligation seems to have passed.
RevDeb @ 15
Have discussions on major progressive blogs about it?
We have a big community of people who are natural targets for the book. We should keep pushing it and pulling action items from it.
Gonna take a chance and see if this comment goes through…
When I have the patience for it, I have plenty of opportunities to discuss these issues right in my own home – a Republican husband comes in handy that way. *g* But I don’t usually have that patience, and he knows me too well, so we’ll set that example aside. After 26 years, we can finish each other’s sentences like others play “Name that Tune:” he can usually get what I am going to say after two words, and sometimes he doesn’t even have to utter a word for me to know what is about to be said.
I know a few pretty conservative types at work, and I find that I can repeat back to them what they are saying: “So, I think what I hear you saying is…” which sometimes leads the person to say, no, that isn’t what they are saying. I keep going with this, forcing the other person to do more than speak in sound bites and talking points, to actually have to think about what they are saying, and then hear how it sounds when I mirror it back. This technique has been known to send some off mumbling to themselves.
As to why I am a progressive, I guess it’s just the only thing that makes sense. I grew up in a home where we were taught to think, where we were encouraged to express our opinions, and be prepared to defend them. I have a strong sense of fairness, and while I don’t believe in people playing the system, I also don’t believe it is right to force people who have genuine problems to live on the streets. I see being progressive as a strong indication that someone is open to whatever is out there, who isn’t afraid to look at all sides, who isn’t afraid of coloring outside the lines, who isn’t afraid of others who are not like them.
We do not fear knowledge, we welcome it.
(fingers crossed that this posts!)
Is there a way we can post an action item of the day on top somewhere?
Matt, thanks for hosting. There are some great ideas in this book and it’s very readable.
Thanks to RevDeb for urging the Mass Rootz to read this. She’s becoming the east coast distributor. ; )
Pachacutec @ 17
tubal litigation you say?
Those damned lawyers gumming up the works again.
BTW I don’t think it has quite passed yet.
One encouraging guerilla activism thing out there that I’m a fan of is the Mouths Wide Open project. The group takes small, plastic toy soldiers – you know, the green kine that every American boy gets by the bagful at some point growing up – and puts a sticker on them that says “Bring Me Home mouthswideopen.org“.
The group leaves them in public places for people to find. Anyone can replicate this action by buying a bag of the toys and pasting stickers with a message of peace on the bottom.
Matt @ 23
I like that. Gonna have to do it.
sorry to go off topic, but this was GREAT
one of Lamont’s staffers was doing a raido interview on “state of belief”, an air America program with a progressive host who is also a member of the clergy
what happened was INCREDIBLE!
(can someone find out this Lamont staffer’s name please, and unbeleiveably well spoken gentleman who sounds like he’s been in politics all his life)
anyway, the conversation came around to cheney’s statement assiciating the lieberman loss to terrorism
the staffer, in an even temper went OFF on the vice president
he started with;
now, that’s not verbatum, I did it from memory, but believe me, I didn’t embelish…this guy just EMBARRASSED the vice president, IT WAS INCREDIBLE
maybe somehow the lamont team can get a copy of that interview and post that protion for us to download and cherish
tag check
Sorry Deb, no mohawk. But it’s damned short.
Revdeb–
I’m a UU also. I think I understand what you mean about the “partisan” thing in relation to church.
My church is in process of becoming a Welcoming Congregation, and I want us to do outreach/build bridges to mainline denominations. I keep thinking that this book would be a help in that work, though I’m concerned that people might be frightened off by the title…unless it’s the religious right, which of course UUs whom I know have no trouble being resistant to.
Aloha Folks… Matt, I just ordered my copy and I’m looking forward to it. I’m always in search of “Secret Scrolls” to add more styles to my “Democracy Kung Fu!”
As to the question above about wanting to know why we fight… Well, someone once said, “We are not our words or even our actions. We are what we fight for… Especially when we fight for nothing!”
BlueUU @ 27
There’s lots in the book to do with our own social action committees and some of it includes making alliances with others.
Since I do interim ministry, I find that many of our churches talk like they do justice work, but not many do, or at least do anything substantial. Lots of individuals do.
In Sept. I want to take this book and invite everyone to bring copies to a big meeting and go through it page by page. Challenge folks to do as many of the items as possible. Maybe even have some kind of, dare I say, competition (yes I know we teach our kids non-competitive games) to see how much we really can do? I’d bet that lots of our committee chairs across the country would be thrilled to have such a guide book. As in everything else UU, they can take what they want and leave the rest.
Enjoy it Nate!
Matt Browner-Hamlin @ 26
Matt, YOU are the one who pledged to go mohawk. No one, to my knowledge put those words in your mouth (or on your page).
Actually, I think you’d look silly that way. Just keep doing what you are doing and fighting the good fight. After all, we crazy bloggers don’t want people to think we’re counter-culture, do we? Having met so many at YKos and in CT, I know that we are your ordinary average citizens who just happen to be political junkies who want our country back.
I do not want to fight. I want to persuade with peaceful words, and withdraw support from that which I oppose. I believe we must be what we want the world to be, if we truly want it to be that way. I want an end to war and an end to fighting, though I know both will continue to exist at some level and in some places for as long as the future can be presently imagined. But it is the same to me as wanting an end to crime, and refusing to behave criminally to end it.
One of the things that draws me to FDL is that it instinctively follows a principle of grassroots organizing perhaps best stated in Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky:
Alinsky and his Industrial Areas Foundation had an incredible influence on my early thinking about organizing for progressive causes. Before his death in 1972, he sat for a lengthy interview that can be found, in multiple parts, at The Progress Report.
Almost 35 years later, it’s impressive how much his words still resonate today and how those of the opposition haven’t changed. We may be taking advantage of some new tools, but the strategic thinking should be the same.
I too want an end to crime but it’s not against the law to lock my doors at night to foil thieves. Much of what we can do as activists is as simple, non-violent and peaceful as that…
My answer to: “Who is the left wing we keep hearing about from the Bush/Coulter Republican Party?”
The “left” is that batshit, crazy 67% fringe that doesn’t believe in Bush anymore.
-GSD
Question: What’s the difference between George W. Bush and Santa Claus?
Answer: Some people still believe in Santa Claus.
GSD:
Hilarious!
RevDeb@29–
I used to chair Social Action and was even VP for Outreach at one time, and we fret a lot about doing stuff as individuals rather than as congregations. I went to a Social Justice organizing/training session put on by our district (Heartland) some years back. Apparently the old model was individual action, although now many churches use other models of consensus building and so on. There was a lot of debate about whether the social action committee spoke for the whole church or just for the members of the social action committee.
My congregation has been pretty internally focused since we bought a building a few years ago and struggle to keep it paid for and running; we have 70-ish members. But there is always concern within that we’re not doing enough SA and yet no giant head of steam builds over it. The Welcoming Congregation stuff will be a big accomplishment, believe it or not. We do have a lot of energy around environmental action/stewardship, though. And we are pretty involved with the local family resource center, which provides a safety net for the poor in our community. Still, I think we all feel like we’re mostly using Band-Aids over many issues.
I like the idea of getting the whole church rolling with this book, which I bought some time ago and use as a resource personally. Maybe I need to venture back onto the social action committee.
whig @ 32
I don’t think any of us want to “fight.” But here are a couple of quotes from the beginning of the book in the Basic training section:
This is what we are up against.
If we are in this for the long haul, we can’t prevail if we are using pocket knives against AK-47’s. I am a lover of peace AND I realize that we are in a war and I don’t mean Iraq, I mean for the soul of the country and the Constitution. I’m ready to suit up and do what is necessary.
Why make the effort? Well, it you drive around the country, just about anywhere, even the top of Mt. Hood in Washington, you see the legacy another generation left for us. Bridges, and libraries, and public schools that are classics, and stately courthouses, and parks and trails in the mountains, and even lodges like the one on Mt. Hood. And they did all of this during the Great Depression, when the country was flat on its back and there were millions unemployed and almost out of hope — but they didn’t give up; they built something for us — not them, for us. They built thousands of somethings, all over the country, because they believed in the future and in their kids and in us — they believed we’d notice and care and realize we have to do the same for the next generation. That was the whole idea of America.
And I look around today at the neocons and what legacy are they leaving? Dying infrastructure, neglected schools and public facilities, wealthy gated communities for the privileged few, surrounded by decaying neighborhoods and services for the many. And death everywhere — from NOLA to Iraq to Lebanon.
We have to turn that around. I want to leave something worthwhile behind, so that the next generations will say, “wow, those guys really were great, and they make me want to do the same thing for my kids.”
Please remain on topic for Book Salon. Other discussion is still ongoing downstairs. Thanks!
Oops.
-GSD
Scarecrow @ 39:
Right on. Thanks for sharing this with us scarecrow – I think you capture the zeitgeist for blog-based activism extraordinarily well.
Hey, Mt. Hood is in Oregon!
BlueUU
Good for you. Great stuff. I do plan to push the book through the UUWorld and any other outlet I can find. I may even try to enlist some congregations to “field test” it and do some follow-up to see how it goes. Interested?
I’m not sure how we will be using this at the new site, but there is where we want the action to be because the plan over there is active rather than passive.
Matt, Pach, how about posting “Action of the Day” on the front page there somewhere?
Uh, You’re right, the lodge I’m thinking of is in Oregon, but there are things like that in many states.
JH/97365 @ 43
And Timberline Lodge is one of the most beautiful places you could ever visit. Crafted by hand with love during the worst time of the depression.
Spent our wedding night there. Skiers going by the window in mid-june.
Does any one else hear echoes of the Nazi “Jewish Museum”?
RBG @#33 I’ve been carrying around my Saul Alinksy for 30 years. I recently met a community organizer and she had never heard of him. I took great delight in buying her one of his books. Now it appears I’m going to have to find out if she’s read 50 Simple…
RevDeb@44–
Sure, I’m interested. I’ll see if I can get everyone else fired up about it also. What a useful way to get people motivated.
BlueUU
there’s an e-mail link on my web site. Click through and we’ll “talk.”
a lengthy 1972 Playboy interview with Saul Alinsky
scarecrow 39:
Thanks for this most eloquent reminder of days past and what we will be again. scarecrow, that was beautiful!!!
Deb – Check out 100Actions.com, they have an action a day until election day.
General question: How might “homeowners’ groups” tap the political message network?
They were specifically targeted by the right for their control over political displays.
Blogging by neighborhood/precinct really created some political momentum before and during the GOTV in CT. (As observed from afar.)
I’m attempting to get my homeowners group to start blogging. It is local by design and observable globally.
Kathryn in MA @ 47
I’ve heard it elsewhere. The Nazis wanted to kill all the Jews, except for one — who would ride around Berlin with Hitler in his limousine.
Rush Limbaugh is a master at blending ridicule and fascist talking points. Does that make Dick Cheney a fascist, because he likes to be interviewed by Rush Limbaugh?
No, Dick Cheney IS a fascist — and that’s why he feels at home with fellow fascist Rush Limbaugh.
All–
My husband just suggested a walk as it’s a beautiful summer evening in SW Ohio–so very rare. So I’m off to put my shoes on!
Later!
*ilson@#51…Thanks for the link. All I have to do to make myself giggle is to remember the first fart-in he planned in Rochester. The visual (olfactory?) is so overwhelming I just crack up.
Matt Browner-Hamlin @ 53
yep, it is a good site, but I’d still like to see us adopt this kind of thing for the Rootz.
Anne @ 19 and Scarecrow 39 amen to what you both said.
Anne, I believe Fox, et al have retrained the masses to be unable to think and discuss for themselves. Seeking anything beyond a conclusory statement is offensive to many neocons, and they usually get flustered and angry.
Scarecrow, I feel that the Bush administration has been the equivalent of a hostile takeover, and the liquidation and sell off of assets is all but complete. I agree we need to reinvest in our country for our children.
How does the Right plan to ”fight” terrorism without engaging in liberalism?
Democracy is a liberal based form of government. Education for all the population – not just the wealthy elite – liberal. Women allowed to vote, to drive, to work – liberal. Free press (don’t start me on the AIPAC case) – liberal. This is why they are having such a huge disconnect. They would have had to make a commitment to liberalism for their concepts of regime change to work. Then they would have seen, immediately, that liberalism and military occupation don’t work together. Totalitarianism and military occupation work – but that’s not the message they wanted to send and not the commitment of time and resources we could make – bringing our totalitarian occupation to the world.
Policing, subject to protections for civil liberties, supplants militarized occupation if you want to liberalize the society. Militarizing our role, not just in the world, but in our own backyards — that’s my reason for being pissed. Dictators rely on militarized responses, civil leaders rely on police powers subject to legal constraints.
*ilson—we linked to the same interview but at different sites. Must be synchronicity. I’ll admit, the very first time I read it, I thought I was only there for the pictures.
Kewalo—what’s truly sad is not that your organizer friend hasn’t read it but that, almost certainly, Karl Rove has.
mjh –yeah, that’s a helpful way to look at a lot of what’s happening.
And re Fox: Fox didn’t have to train them. They’re home schooled, pre-disposed to believe without challenging. What Rove did was to make them too scared to ask question about what they were told. The blogs are a direct threat to that. We are part of “50 blogs you can read every day to challenge what you thought you knew . . .”
I only read Playboy for the Saul Alinsky interviews.
And and On Topic thought — the GOP right wingers have been kicking the Democrats ass, because the GOP learned and internalized the lessons of Saul Alinsky and FDR.
Meanwhile, the Democrats forgot everything they ever knew about politics, replaced by a Lieberman sense of disconnected entitlement.
Ask Tom Foley or Tom Daschle how that majority leader thingy is working out.
The Great Depression. I know what my father was doing then. He was working for the WPA about thirty miles from here in southwestern Oklahoma. And the work he did still stands, and serves a useful purpose to this day.
One of the things about the book and what comes out in conversations with John (the writer) is that this is going to be a long haul, long term project.
The wingers didn’t take power overnight and we can’t expect to take it back quickly. This is not about winning the next election cycle, it is about having a country that we want our kids to grow up in and prosper, intellectually, sprirtually, and financially. The way the wingers have ruled is all about money and power. They really don’t care about the debt they are leaving for those to come. They are about personal gain and winner take all.
That’s not who we are.
We are about common people for the common good.
We are about sharing the wealth.
We are about taking care of the most vulnerable among us.
We are about the peaceful resolution of disputes.
We are about justice and the rule of law.
That’s why we do what we do. And it WILL take a long time and a lot of work to turn this boat around. But as Margaret Meade said,
RBG@#60 She has now! Now I just need to see if she’s read 50 Simple Things and make sure she reads that too.
Deb at 64 — well said.
Scarecrow @ 60 – True! Unfortunately, and sadly, I think I have some distant relatives whom you’ve described. It does no good to debate anything with them.
Bravo RevDeb! I couldn’t agree more. I’m hoping we can start a takeover this election but if we don’t I’m in for the longrun. It’s too important to just give up.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 62
And they even managed to put the artists to work. Imagine.. they gave Woody Guthrie a job writing “The Grand Cooley Dam”. And the WPA kept the young abstract expressionists from starving. It was a pretty comprehensive well-rounded and humanistic approach to getting this country back on its feet. Remarkable.
ck@62
Seems to me that Rove’s playbook is right out of Josef Goebbels.
RevDeb—Amen!
Sorry for stepping away for a minute, I’m in the midst of cooking dinner and now have to go eat…back in 15.
Jenny ftb
It is the art at Timberline that makes it so special. Some pics here.
Disclosure/confession: I’m still WAY behind on my reading, very sorry, Matt; my copy of “Strawberry Days” just showed up and I won’t get through yours until next weekend.
But I needed to jump in and shout AMEN!!! to number 25 in this post.
I will testify loudly and gladly to each of you FirePups that showing up is the biggest part of the battle. It took me showing up at a single meeting to completely rock the foundations of a local organization, and my peeps will testify to the same. BE HERE, NOW. It’s that simple.
Not having read Matt’s book yet, I don’t know if this is one of the 50 Things — but it’s my recommended second step. Once you show up and are there, ASK THE STUPID QUESTION. You know, that dumb question you are terrified to ask. What you don’t realize is that most of the people in the room will be very thankful you asked the question. As a newbie showing up for the first time, you have incredible power you will not have again, the power that comes from the slack that groups cut neophytes and novices. Maybe that’s the underlying cause of beginner’s luck…but who gives a rat’s butt, USE IT.
I asked the stupid question at my first meeting; asking it prevented other unidentified newbies from leaving, encouraged them to come back again, and again, until we became a movement of our own. SO ASK.
Back to the issue of #25: do the numbers. In my state there are 10 million residents in 83 counties. At each of the party meetings there are an average of 25 people that show up consistently. That’s less than 2100 people who are actively working to protect Democratic/democratic processes in this state, only 1 in every 4700 or so people.
And this is a so-called BLUE state.
Please, I beg you, take that first step and simply SHOW UP.
a brilliant film about the WPA in the arts is Tim Robbins Cradle Will Rock
mjh — know the feeling. In my extended family on mom’s side, I have one terrific aunt and two cousins, out of about 40, who don’t see me as as ” lost, or at best, in immediate need of exorcism.” A rabid, venomous, lambsher of the left. But my aunt makes great New Mexico enchiladas and is a treasure. The rest are mostly book burners, and “50 Things . . .” would be thrown in first.
RevDeb –
It’s not so much that Rove is using the Goebbels playbook, but that Goebbels used methods that worked. Political Marketing 101, and all that.
In the 1940’s, the Republicans called FDR “The Great Dictator” — but FDR worked for the common good, while Dictator Bush works for the privileged few.
Plus, FDR was a lot more honest than these bastards.
America needs a New Deal for the 21st Century.
ck @ 77
agree on all counts.
RevDeb @ 72
RevDeb, thank you. I would love to visit Timberline, if for nothing else to see that Howard S. Sewell. That painting is really something else.
I’ve seen the WPA murals and paintings in San Francisco, though. I think they’re in Coit Tower (if I’m remembering correctly).
I don’t know if we’d ever have the foresight or appreciation to create a comprehensive arts support program again in this country – somehow I think it would be left out of the equation – I hope I’m wrong.
much of the WPA was financed by deficit spending — the anti-Roosevelt reactionaries hollered about “Tax and spend!” “Out of control budgets!” “Buying votes!” “Fiscal sanity!”
Woodrow Wilson Guthrie: this land is my land, this land is your land… Yours too, Jenny.
Okiddo
“America needs a New Deal for the 21st Century.”
I agree.
Rayne—you just recited page 98 of 50 Simple Things…without even reading it. Well done!
Scarecrow, it’s good to know that there are such dichotomies in other families, too. One of my brothers whom I was always close with growing up(I’m from a large catholic family)is now a card-carrying member of the NRA and a Rush Limbaugh listener! He has phoned me to ask me why I am such a liberal. He’s confounded! I told him that I would read one book that he would recommend, if he, in exchange, would read one that I recommend. While I can think of numerous books, he can’t think of one!! And, he’s not dumb, he’s just given up reading and thinking for himself. He’s become purposefully ignorant!
I think of us here at FDL like the outcasts from Farenheit 451 some days. We’ll each be a book (”It was the best of times, it was the worst of times“) and be living in the woods, breathing embodiments of the great writings after they’ve all been torched by our modern-day Savaronolas.)
I know it’s not a cheery thought, but it always makes me feel better and stronger to know we’re not alone. I need to decide which book I’ll be…
Jenny — Yeah, that’s important. We have to ensure the arts funding ourselves. If the neocons did it, they’d pervert it the same way they’ve done to CPB. We need them out of power.
I don’t know if it has been mentioned here, but the book’s web site has sample chapters from it on line here.
Oklahoma kiddo @ 80
And yes, my other favorite too, the one that always makes me cry… Plane wreck at Los Gatos (Deportee)…
Goodbye to my Juan, goodbye, Rosalita,
Adios mis amigos, Jesus y Maria;
You won’t have your names
when you ride the big airplane,
All they will call you will be “deportees”
mjh — well, ya gottem, then. Send him a different book each week/month, until he counters.
I purchased 50 copies of this book. I take a few copies to the various meetings I attend, such as the county political party, meetings of progressive women, meet the candidate gatherings, and sell it at cost to anyone who is interested. The books are all gone; I’ll have to order more.
I haven’t read the book yet, but I intend to.
I wonder whether anyone would like to tell us what their favorite “Simple Thing” is, and how they are applying it.
mjh — or maybe a used copy of Coulter’s book, with underlining of at least 50 examples of the hate speech, racist comments, etc — then ask him if you believes all that, because that’s who speaks for him.
oops — “ask him if he believes all that . . .”
About Deportee, I thought it was interesting they left that song out of the great recent American Masters program. They mentioned the plane wreck and how it affected him, but not the song. And then there was the glaring omission of Arlo Guthrie too. So I did some research and found out that Woody wrote the Deportee lyrics as a spoken word piece and later a melody was written by someone else (when he was already committed to a hospital?).
Others performed the piece, but it was Arlo whose recording was heard so widely. And now I’m thinking Arlo did not approve of the project and kept certain things (copyrights?) away from the producers.
Can’t imagine why, though.
The Scots, the Okies and the Irish share something. They know what it is to struggle against what seems to be insurmountable pending defeat. And yet, triumph. And walk proud. And so many others of different backgrounds in America, know just as well of what I speak.
I also want to hear about why you’re involved in this movement from progressive change and against the radically regressive agenda of today’s Republican Party. Why do you fight? Why are you an activist?
Oh man, where to begin. I am going to try to answer that. I guess I am involved, because I am a casual history buff who can’t stand to see this country go back to an Upton Sinclair era. I care about people and don’t like to see people getting hurt or ripped off or treated unfairly in the workplace, etc.. Also I am a patriot who can’t stand to see this country’s 18th c. ideals demolished along with its standing in the world. I think most Americans are disenfranchised from the political process, have no say and I think that has to change. We can start by replacing senators who are contemptuous of their constituents like Lieberman with attentive responsive ones like Lamont.
This book is great by the way. I browse it like a handbook from time to time.
Scarecrow – tee hee! I was just thinking that I was relieved that he didn’t mention Coulter’s book to me! I like the way you think, and maybe I will send him a few books on the taint of this administration, together with heavily tabbed and underlined copy of her book. Although I hate to spend one red dime on Coulter’s book!
mjh @ 97
you can probably find it remaindered somewhere—or used online.
Sorry, for the unedited comment and incomplete sentence. I should’ve proofed it first! I can’t quite figure out the “edit this comment” function yet.
RBG — oh cool!! I’ll be sure to check out page 98 FIRST when I get my copy of 50 Things!!
I’ll earmark it, flag it with fluorescent Post-it Note, so when I run into one of my reluctant friends I can say, START HERE!
I have about 10 books I’m trying to read simultaneously; one of them is Founding Brothers, by Joseph Ellis. Little book, but chewy; I didn’t make it far before I read something that made me stop and take a deep breath.
For those of you who are hesitating — those of you who have the time and resources to do more than vote — I ask you to consider as Glenn Greenwald asked, “What would a patriot do?”
Here is what the founding brothers thought, as they went about pursuing the democracy upon which our country was created; they did not have the luxury that we have to assume that democracy and representative government were foregone conclusions:
We need only show up. We need only be firm and persistent, be forthright and vocal. It’s the least we can do as heirs to men who risked their lives and fortunes for our freedoms.
What would a patriot do, after all?
OT
Colbert on 60 minutes (wish I’da known earlier) now.
mjh — I will never do this again, but just this once, I can in good conscience strongly urge you to steal the Coulter book. Don’t get caught!
scarecrow @ 101
STEAL THIS BOOK! heh.
Neuro—Chapter 13, Adopt A Candidate.
It helped me get past a personal reticence about getting involved in races outside of my own legislative district. Of course, Jane and Howie might also have had a little influence in my decision.
Jenny from the Blog @ 103
just be careful. they have those magnetic thingies in them now that make the doors at the store angry.
RevDeb and Scarecrow – you’ve got me on a mission!! RevDeb, is it okay if I lift a copy?
scarecrow — heh. I’ve found some rather amusing books at the Dollar Store, of all places. Says something about the book and the author (although you know many are ghost-written). I found books by Tom Daschle and Joe Lieberman recently, have seen many ‘winger books but passed them up.
Bet you Coulter will be there; I’d cough up the buck just to say that I’d bought her text at a Dollar Store.
Asked and answered! Thanks!!
mjh @ 106
we don’t “do sin” in our churches. Let your conscience be your guide (hmmm didn’t someone say that?)
And if you get caught, you’re a Republican who works in the WH. We know you not.
gotta go eat. not polite to blog while eating.
later . . .
scarecrow @ 109
mjh? Hmm.. might’ve met him in a rope line once… :)
I wish RevDeb had told me that before I blogged while eating tonight. I hope I didn’t offend anyone.
Christy’s going to prosecute if you get caught. Uh, maybe borrow one from a colleague.
Why am I assuming mjh is male???
scarecrow @ 77
I have to confess part of my progressiveness must have come from my mother who is more quietly patriotic than myself. She grew up pretty desperately poor in Boston looking at the underbelly of the beast. I try not to be appalled by other members of my family like my sister, who I love dearly, but she swallows the dominant political meme, ET and Britney Spears, and hysterical crime stories whole. That’s painful.
RevDeb @ 112
Oh, right, Deb! Like you, Kathryn, Selise and every blogger in Meriden didn’t bring your computers to breakfast, lunch and dinner! Gimme a break.
Scarecrow and Jenny from the Blog – you are too funny!! Nice to know you’ll cover for me, not! Actually, I’m not male, but I must write like one, and that’s not meant to be a sexist comment.
mjh -
nah, it’s just that nice girls don’t steal books so I assumed… er…
I actually found David Sirota’s Hostile Takeover pretty complementary to this book. It helps to understand certain unnamed congresscritters.
What? We’re supposed to stop blogging to eat? Unfair.
New suggested topic for PUAC: favorite stuffed animals. We had this on another of my message boards with hilarious and sentimental results. Adults…sorta.
Another topic: collections. Evening bags and shoes. Things a husband doesn’t need to know quite how much they cost :)
Nature note: on my extra long forest sanity walk I saw a blue heron!!! Talk about reward.
Remember smile, it passes the time between emergencies! [or meltdowns, in my case]
mui — yes, and Greenwald’s “How Would a Patriot . . .” provides another nice foundation.
? I don’t see my comment, even in moderation. Hmm.
This might sound silly, but I go to a couple of message boards. I’m a little disabled and can’t get out much. So I loved pg 30 about taking back the language. Whenever one of the RW start using their dreadful talking points I come right back at them. You’d really be surprised at how many stupid old farts there are at the AARP forum. Some really bright one’s too, but a ton of stupid ones. I figure if I can just change one mind, it’s a winning day.
BTW
In 2002, I just called it 50 Ways to Dump the Dubya.
Can’t wait to read the book tho…
mjh –
Don’t steal — little sins add up, until they become the chains on Marley’s ghost.
And the edit thingy — it doesn’t work in IE, but it does work in Firefox.
Jenny from the Blog, yeah, and I think that as the former Republican WH employee (that you and Scarecrow were referring to) I was recently give probation, right?
Mui – I meant to ready David Sirota’s book. I will have to go find that one, as well as “50 Simple . . .”
I am trying to compile a list of congresscritters who are not as lobbyist-ridden and corrupt as Lieberliar. Anybody got ideas?
Once more into the breach.
Must we stop blogging in order to eat? Unfair.
Suggested topic for PUAC: favorite stuffed animals. Also: collections, for example :) evening bags and shoes.
On my forest sanity walk I saw a blue heron!
Another comment got eaten.
????
If in moderation wouldn’t it show, at least to me?
Kewalo—we’re in sync, I was just typing the link for page 30, a pdf from 50 Simple Things about how to redefine the language of the wingnuts.
Humor is also a great way to break the ice headedness of your adversaries.
Q. What do you call a Christian who believes in Reincarnation?
A. Born Again and Again.
egregious — mine in moderation show to me, on my Mac, in both Firefox and Safari.
mjh @ 125
Well, the original rope-liner was Kenny Boy who’s now recently departed, but yeah, that other one too. :)
All joking aside, I’ll stand up for you!
scarecrow @ 117
That’s different. We were in the company of bloggers (and I only brought it to one breakfast, in the hotel where there was wireless, wireless that would not let us post to FDL, crap wireless as far as I’m concerned.)
My husband doesn’t like it at all when I bring the laptop to the table, so to keep peace, I don’t.
mjh@127
Don’t quote me on this, because I have bought a lot of good books thanks to FDL, but I might have gotten a super-savers deal on Sirota and 50 ways on Amazon.com. Or maybe it was just free shipping. At any rate, I find I save if I wait a little and buy all at once.
-ck-
Thanks on both points! We’re getting a storm, so I hope to catch up with you all again later!
Most days I feel like I am fighting the right just by refusing to stop learning and thinking. That seems like it should be easy, but when you consider how angry and frustrated we usually feel just reading the paper or watching the news, we probably all sacrifice some ignorant bliss just by making that conscious decision to keep our brains plugged in.
It has, actually, forced me to find things that smooth out the rough edges that staying on top of things gives me. Some nights, it’s making a conscious decision to just listen to music on the commute home. Or not turning on the TV in the morning as I get ready for work.
I fight the right by refusing to let the talking heads tell me what the story is and how I should feel about it. When people are talking casually about “the news,” I find myself having to take a deep breath and – just as casually – say, “did you know that…?” just because I cannot stand that some people still think that what Chris Matthews or Wolf Blitzer or Brit Hume or Brian Williams tell them is the sum and substance of what is happening in the world.
Speaking of deep breaths, I think I need one…*g*
egregious@130 -Perhaps the server found your comment yummy?
Oh sheesh, I am sort of supposed to be babysitting. G’night all.
I will never surrender to, and never cease the fight against the right. Not so much for what they are, but for what they think they are.
egregious, I’m showing two comments from you at 5:05 and 5:08, both with the blue herron in them.
Anne, they’d love to steal our souls but that’s one thing they’ll never do. I’m with you on the recharging, it’s essential.
try refreshing the page from the top rather than the refresh comments button.
I just sprang 2 of egregiouses comments …
RBG @ 131
To be honest I felt a little silly even putting that post up. But I love language, good writing is heaven to me (and BTW I’m going through Walcott withdrawal, he hasn’t had a new post in days) So getting back the language is important to me and that’s literally the only way I can do it. I’ve so enjoyed the conversations about framing. We have to start doing the framing ourselves.
Another BTW Ned was absolutely wonderful on Fox today. He did some great framing.
egregious — they’re up:
Are we really going to do that one? *g*
Kewalo @ 145
I bet he’s done some Habitat for Humanity volunteer work too…
eg*egious is setting off the alarms. I just posted a reply to her, and it went to an EPU.
scarecrow – have NO earthly idea why your comment went into moderation, but it’s free now…
scarecrow — you mean to an APU — not a Biden Apu but an Alternate Parallel Universe
Anne — Thanks. It was not an earthly reason. Strange things happen in EPU, and we humans are not to know of these things.
Scarecrow – your’s/e’s have done what one of mine did when it went into moderation.
It comes out with sprinkled in it.
*ilson@#147 HAHAHAAHA!
Anne@#138 You are so right. I am always astounded at the flat-out ignorance of people that only watch TV.
*ilson — if there were a “good” alternate parallel universe, it would be optimistic sign, and a powerful reason to increase science budgets.
Ned Thread
How nice to come in from the garden, and the hot sun, to find this discussion.
First, I want to thank Matt for helping us so much on the roots project site, and for being here today.
I first became “aware” of how political activism could change the country the summer of 1973. Between my stint at Jewish summer camp and the beginning of my 9th grade year, I found myself locked into position in front of the television, as the Watergate hearings unfolded. It was the best theater I’d ever seen. And I knew those hearings – and the outcome – would have a huge impact on the future.
Then, in my first year of college, I met Leon Panetta when he ran for Congress in my district (Santa Cruz). He met with about 15 students, stood there in rolled-up sleeves and answered every question put to him – honestly. I was so impressed. I started writing to him (he always wrote back) about the looming disaster that Prop 13 would have on California’s education system. He and his wife even sent me Chrsitmas cards each year. Yes, it was a vert different time.
As an adult, I’ve found that being active in community organizations is where it’s at. I serve on the board of my community council because: it’s where I live . I also serve on the board of directors of my city’s League of Women Voters. And considering that I run my own business, I’m busier than I ever imagined possible. But being in the LWV has taught me a million things about political participation of ordinary citizens, among which: it matters to the powers-that-be that we show up, and it really gets results. It’s also really hard work and can, literally, take years for substantive change to occur, and become the status quo. Most of all, it’s imperative that we get the facts straight. We need to be smarter than everybody else. The radical right lies, the corporate interests lie. But facts don’t. And we need to be creative. I think that’s where our roots project comes in.
I believe we need to be the change we seek. Call it what you will – “practice what you preach; putting your money where your mouth is” – we need to be living examples of the future we desire. And form what I know about FDLers, we are. I’m really impressed with the way people here are so active in so many ways. To be liberal means to be open-minded, accepting, and looking out for the other guy, not just ourselves. That’s the kind of world I want to see in our future. I’m a part of the roots project for that very reason.
EPU is just unforgiving.
sigh.
Jenny:
Name checking Guthrie and Savonarola in the same post: pretty damn good!
Bloggers are proving that self-published commentary can influence political discourse in Washington and capture the zeitgeist outside of Washington.
Bloggers are endeavoring to repeat the success of the likes of Tom Paine, and the entire ouvre of pamphleteers and other Revolutionalry self-publishers of another era…
it demonstrates why it is so important to the fascists that the ownership of the “Press” remain ’selective’, that the barriers to entry remain high and exclusive, and it explains the fascination upon ‘credentials’ of the ‘professional’ SCUM (SoCalledUnbiased Media)…
Hey, dorlin Jennie!!!
and liz!!!
howzit dahlins…
i never see you anymore…
(dabs small, but insistent tear from corner of eye)
Shoephone—that was beautifully said….now come on upstairs with the rest of us.
Interesting thoughts from leftist William Shawcross:
“Those of us who opposed the American war in Indochina should be extremely humble in the face of the appalling aftermath: a form of genocide in Cambodia and horrific tyranny in both Vietnam and Laos. Looking back on my own coverage for The Sunday Times…, I think I concentrated too easily on the corruption and incompetence of the South Vietnamese and their American allies, was too ignorant of the inhuman Hanoi regime, and far too willing to believe that a victory by the Communists would provide a better future. But after the Communist victory came the refugees to Thailand and the floods of boat people desperately seeking to escape the Cambodian killing fields and the Vietnamese gulags. Their eloquent testimony should have put paid to all illusions”
LeakRW18GZ KuH8GtM9C9D7 X3MSZdS6hDow