Comments on: Rove to CT-Republicans: Don’t Ditch Schlessinger

By: Timothy Beauchamp

Timothy Beauchamp — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:22:14 +0000

What was Lieberman’s role in the 2000 elections?

http://www.margieburns.com/blo.....22583.html

By: benwa

benwa — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:15:49 +0000

When is the democratic “leaders” in elected offices going to stand up and fightthe lies and spin of the right? This is sickening that not one of them is coming out strong and telling the righties that it is not the fringe that elected Lamont, but the mainstream??? BY mainstream, I mean the entire population of the US.

The spinelessness of the elected ones is pathetic.

By: Timothy Beauchamp

Timothy Beauchamp — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:12:40 +0000

Ned Lamont!!!

Democratic Senate nominee Ned Lamont responded yesterday to Dick Cheney’s suggestion that his primary upset heartened terrorists, saying the vice president was mixing up the war on terror with the invasion of Iraq.

“I just think that this Bush administration confuses a comprehensive attack on the terrorists with the invasion of Iraq,” Lamont said in a telephone interview yesterday. “I think the invasion of Iraq was a terrible distraction.”

GO NED GO!

http://www.greenwichtime.com/n.....-headlines

By: Crooks and Liars » A Matter of Trust

Crooks and Liars » A Matter of Trust — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:55:10 +0000

[…] And the fact that he apparently feels that he is entitled to one says everything you need to know about the empty, egomaniacal husk of a man that Lieberman has become — holing up in his hotel room and refusing to talk to long-time political friends who are trying to talk sense to a man who is besmirching whatever political legacy he may still have by pushing forward the "Lieberman for Lieberman" ego parade. […]

By: Sam

Sam — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 01:30:28 +0000

Makes you feel warm and fuzzy that NARAL has chosen to continue their support for Lieberman in light of his loss.

By: tanbark

tanbark — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:48:57 +0000

Good thread, Jane.

That’s the key question, following Ned’s showing the lamo democratic “leadership” how to do it;

Will they find the intellectual courage to do start naming bushCo’s bloody bullshit, for what it is?

The need for ANY kind of bi-partisanship went down the tube when that first Abrams crossed the dry-bed Rubicon on the border of Kuwait.

Goatboy and the neo-cons got down in the back alley and rolled the bones, and now they’re coming up snake-eyes.

Deal with it, assholes.

By: Ralphie

Ralphie — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:30:42 +0000

Lieberman’s statements in the NYT article are pathetic. He uses the foiled terrorist attack to try and make Lamont look weak on security, then bemoans the idea that anyone would use the WOT for ‘partisan’ politics. I just don’t see how this is going to fly in Connecticut. I thought Lamont and Swan’s response to this BS was very good. Leiberman looks like the fool he has become.

By: cynic

cynic — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:02:54 +0000

hippies in the blogosphere huh? I’m not a hippie, just an older American voter who is sick of seeing fat fucks like Rove wearing that flag pin. It’s a disgrace. He’s not an American.

By: e

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:49:57 +0000

the dance is over and the one who brung you has gone home..
you shame yourself..
it’s time to go home and teach in a college while you can…

By: Margot

Margot — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:04:16 +0000

Ed*ward Teller @188
I hope you don’t mind if I send that around to a few friends.