
(Mike Segar/Reuters)
Ned Lamont won the Connecticut primary last night. And the Democratic leadership is already rallying behind his candidacy, according to the NYTimes:
Mr. Lieberman’s determination to remain in the race may soon collide with the will of many Democratic leaders in Washington and Connecticut, however. The Senate minority leader, Harry Reid, and Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York, who is leading the effort to elect more Democrats in November, planned to announce this morning that they were supporting Mr. Lamont and that the party should unite around the nominee, according to Democrats close to both men. A spokesman for Mr. Schumer said a statement would be forthcoming, but declined further comment.
“Reid and Schumer will back Lamont, but the big question is if they will approach Joe about dropping out, because they don’t want to get his back up against the wall,” said a senior Senate Democratic aide who was involved in the Reid-Schumer discussions but was not authorized to discuss them publicly.
Senator Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut, Mr. Lieberman’s Democratic ally, privately congratulated Mr. Lamont last night and was expected to appear at a “unity press conference” with Mr. Lamont and other candidates at state party headquarters this morning. Two Lamont advisers said that they expected Mr. Dodd to help smooth Mr. Lieberman’s exit from the race; a spokeswoman for Mr. Dodd, however, said he would not play a go-between role to broker the senator’s exit.
A spokeswoman for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile, restated Mrs. Clinton’s announced intentions to support the Democratic nominee in Connecticut — now Mr. Lamont.
Joe Lieberman lost the Democratic primary. And if he has so little respect for the voters in that primary that he will not abide by the results, then the party leadership must show him the door. To do otherwise would be to sanction cheating Democratic voters of their rightful say in the party process — and would render the party leadership moot. That is true whether Ned Lamont won by one vote — or by several thousand.
This has been a fight to force the political machinery to listen to the voice of the American public, over the din of lobbyist and corporate interest noise in the Beltway. They are hearing you loud and clear at the moment. From the NYTimes:
Advisers to the senator said last night that Mr. Lieberman was emboldened to continue in the race because of the narrow margin of Mr. Lamont’s victory. Yet the advisers said he might still drop out if the next round of opinion polls showed Mr. Lamont well ahead of Mr. Lieberman in the fall general election.
The Connecticut race drew national and even international attention this summer as a barometer of the mood of American Democrats over the Iraq war. Among political insiders, too, it was seen as a test for liberal bloggers to affect a major election, instead of merely commenting on politics in cyberspace. (emphasis mine)
At some point, the folks who report on politics and the folks who run for office will wake up and understand that bloggers are merely Americans who try to amplify the sentiment of thousands more just like them. And the overwhelming sentiment that I have been hearing for months and months is that people have had enough of the lies, the manipulation, the self-dealing, the egos, the idiocy, the selfishness, and the outright dereliction of duty and lack of accountability from so many in Washington, D.C. in this rubber stamp Republican Congress…we’ve had enough.
We, the people, still have work to do this morning. But take a moment to savor the taste of a victory for our side…and then stoke that hunger for more of those to come in November, because we have a lot of work to do between now and then.
And if you live in the great state of Connecticut, my congratulations. And my thanks to all of you, Nutmegger or not, for all of the work, the canvassing, the GOTV efforts, the calls, the campaign donations, the cheering, whatever — you guys are the best.
If you live in Connecticut, please sit down and write a letter to the editor supporting Ned and asking that Joe Lieberman respect the will of the voters, or that he stop calling himself a Democrat. He doesn’t get to have it both ways.
Related posts:





Spotlight








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

FDL!
the gates are officially crashed.
Pro-War, You get the door!
Oh, what a beautiful morning . . .
The gates are not only crashed but disabled…LieberLIAR better lose ALL his committe positions. He dissed the dems this morn on CNN and as Fox’s fav as partisan…WTF…partisa?…what an IDIOT…y’know what fellow lake dwelleres he is FAR WORSE than any of us thought.
THE INTERNEDS !!!
My apologies, but I was EPU’s from the last thread, so this is a repost.
The immensity of the Lieberman debacle cannot be underestimated. When you consider that he was defeated as a three-term senator, a former candidate for VP of the greatest country in the world, a former presidential candidate, an endorsee of the ex-president of the United States, any number of Senate colleagues, the financial support of special-interest lobbyists, virtually all the MSM (Times excepted), and taken to the woodshed by a rank neophyte who had to build a campaign from scratch (yes, we know he has money)…well, this is nothing short of a political earthquake Richter scale at least 8.0.
Now, keeping this in mind, for Lieberman to get on the podium last night and crow about losing by fewer percentages points than the ‘pundits’ (his word) predicted, shows a deep disconnect with reality on his part. The man is no longer marginally incompetent. He is a political basket case. Any Democratice politician of major standing who, noting the above facts, still supports Lieberman, suffers from the same disconnect with reality. If these politicans are friends to Joe, they should remain friends, and do him a favor by asking him to “go gently into that good night.”
Lieberman is just Zell Miller without the Southern accent …
Thanks Jane for all your goading and encouraging for all of us to get involved in this campaign. Brightest moment in many months, this win.
Maximum respect…….
There will be Dems who support him because there will be “strategists” who say that is the wise course of action. They don’t want to alienate him because he has a good chance of winning as an independent. It is all crap of course – Joe was a headache as a Democrat, and will be worse as an independent. It will give him his wet dream – to be the “bridge” between the Dems and the GOP. In other words GOP enabler. That sucks.
Christy says “At some point, the folks who report on politics and the folks who run for office will wake up and understand that bloggers are merely Americans who try to amplify the sentiment of thousands more just like them. And the overwhelming sentiment that I have been hearing for months and months is that people have had enough of the lies, the manipulation, the self-dealing, the egos, the idiocy, the selfishness, and the outright dereliction of duty and lack of accountability from so many in Washington, D.C. in this rubber stamp Republican Congress…we’ve had enough.”
You are absolutely correct. I get weird looks from friends and family when I speak of “what I read on the blog”. They fall for that media definition of what bloggers are, tin foil hat and all. I just tell them that we are people just like me who are angry at DC and want our country back. We are standing up and saying we have had ENOUGH.
xeroman: I’m not so sure. His Indy run is so blatantly self-serving, he might become radioactive.
The hard work is just beginning for taking back the party and this country. This will look like a cakewalk, but we must persevere, for all who and that we hold dear.
But here’s the incentive not to give up, besides doing the right thing and having some sanity again:
However high you guys felt last night about this victory? Imagine what it will feel like in November. Last night was nothing.
Keep chipping away at the stone.
having followed the race here at fdl, it is amazing to me that just a few months ago ned wasn’t even a blip on the radar. after paul hackett’s run in ohio got scuttled by party leaders i had really lost hope that the will of the people would ever matter in politics again. thank the stars for the good people of ct who rose up to make themselves heard. i hope this is the light in the darkness that prompts voters all across the country to work just a little harder to take back every local, state and national office. ok, maybe i’m getting a little ambitious, but i really hope this is the start of something bigger.
Political Wire
– Sen. Joe Lieberman, in his book In Praise of Public Life published in 2000. Hat tip to Political Wire reader Nick Benson.
FINALLY, Jane (and everybody else who worked so hard so long) gets to relax!
Maura the Goddess!!!
Oh, and here’s how the UK papers like it:
Voters reject Lieberman over his support for Iraq war
Pro-war Lieberman loses Senate primary
Pro-war Lieberman loses to anti-Iraq war challenger
Good Morning — what a beautiful day in the neighborhood!
Hip hip hurrah!!!!
I gave up on the internets last night (those pesky 503s!) but I followed the precint results as they came in . . .
Lieberlooser will have to back out, but he won’t do it for awhile. I’m thinking of his tie for third place in New Hampshire in ‘04. Pouted and whined and scolded for quite some time after that. Unitl he ran out of $$. This time he does have $$, so it will take some big-gun support from DC Dems to put him in his place.
Or maybe Rummy will resign, and Bush will appoint him as the next Sec Def and put us all out of our misery. Would be fitting Karma, because then HoJo would have to learn what it is like to really be held accountable by your party. (somebody could make a nasty groudhog day spoof on this nightmare.)
Exactly Right
Even the NYT gets this
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08…..9wed1.html
windje
Morning all! Massive kudos to the voters of Connecticut! What a rude wake-up call to the cabal of Washington insiders, pundits, and lick spittles.
Joe should not only have his committee assignments yanked, return every cent of party money so it isn’t used to defeat the party nominee, he should also be reminded, ruthlessly and relentlessly, of his own words after the ‘04 Presidential race:
..”there’s no prizes for second place in American politics.”
We started the wave in Ct. now it is up to all of us to continue it until we have changed our country’s direction. We applogize for being the birthplace of GWB by sending you our next Senator Ned Lamont.
I heard a snippet of LIEberman on PNN this morning what a WATB lying sack of shit that man is. Let’s hope the people of CT finish that effer once and for call come Nov.
Here’s a question: have Sean Smith and Dan Gerstein left town yet? If so, Joe has a bigger problem than the voters – he has to build a new operation from scratch.
Good catch, *ilson.
fdl deserves to bask in the sunlight before charging onward to november
you put it well, Christy — Ned won
it’s bullshit that top Democrats feel they need to handle joe with kid gloves: joe isn’t treating Democrats with respect — if joe stays on his committees it will show that top Democrats have nothing but contempt for their constituencies
Is it just me or does it make you mad that all the media hype this morning is “Lieberman Lost” (boo hoo) when it should be “Lamont Wins – defeats 18 yr incumbent”?
lina,
Lieberman IS radioactive
He is the proverbial chicken with his head cut off.
This is a great day for democracy.
The CM is, as usual a bit behind the curve, but once they realize that Joe is toast, they will pile on so fast I will almost pity him.
Polls have shown that in a 3-way race, Joe would win as an independent, but –
1) Those poll numbers are likely to change as Joe’s post-election, sore-loser persona intensifies.
2)The morning after, heat is already intensifiying, as Dems ask Joe to stand down. If he wants to run, he’ll have to face an increasing barrage of flak.
3) My prediction: as more and more prominent Democrats ask him to “Say it ain’t so, Joe,” he’ll eventually back down. But it may take a while for critical mass to build.
It must feel INCREDIBLE to be a Nutmegger today — I mean, think how good we who didn’t have a vote there feel. But THEY did this nation-saving thing.
I love them, I just love them to pieces.
timewarp @ 16
Depending on the date of this hypothetical resignation, wouldn’t it be sweet to see Ned voting on Joe’s confirmation as Secretary of Defense?
Senate Clerk: “Senator Lamont?” . . .
God bless all you hard workers in CT
I think the dems that supported Lieberman have to be very vocal now and call him out. The majority have spoken. He is calling people who voted in Conn. partisan and he said that he was “sick of them partisans”. The dems who supported him, need to make it CLEAR it is over for him…..
If they don’t they desrve to be called lapdogs of Bush!
I think there’s now a good chance that my dream scenario comes true — Joe’s ego keeps him in the race long enough that he’s no longer identified in the public mind as a Democrat, and he can’t speak for Democrats on Fox and elsewhere any more credibly than Zell Miller.
It would be amusing if the Unity08 crowd manage to string him along long enough to humiliate him again, though.
We won!!!!
Woooo Hoooo!!!!!
Ms hardin Smith,
You are linked to on teh front page of the Huffington Post.
And WOOHOO!!!
ummmm . . . RICHARD GOODSTEIN. Ya. Um . . . wow this is tough . . . ummm.
answer me a question if you please . . .
ARE YOU A LAMONT DEMOCRAT OR A LIEBERMAN DEMOCRAT?
ARE YOU A LAMONT DEMOCRAT OR A LIEBERMAN DEMOCRAT?
ARE YOU A LAMONT DEMOCRAT OR A LIEBERMAN DEMOCRAT?
and
GO FUCK YOURSELF!!!!!
Senator Lieberman, respectfully,
SHUDDUP and SIDDOWN, YOU SKEEVY ASSHAT
Next step in Ct is to remove the three Repub representatives. I am loving the thought of Lamont standing up with Chris Murphy who will get rid of Nancy Johnson of the rubber stamp brigade.
To paraphrase the great NorskeFlameThrower:
KEEP STICKING FORKS IN HIM AND PASS THE SCALLOPED POTATOES! HE’S DONE AND DONE!
Now is the time to contact your senators and reps to tell them you support Ned Lamont, and that you are part of the people-powered movement behind him.
Introduce yourself. Offer to build a bridge. They are curious about you, perhaps afraid. They read a lot of lies about you. Reach out. Have an impact. Get organizied together and build relationships with your elected Democrats. Seize the moment!
You know, I realized this last night:
Real victories are far superior to moral victories.
Looking at today’s NYT, I think that is happening. AdNags mostly gets it right. The editorial page is right on the button. Despite some whiny fears for a future without single issue lobbyists, Noam Scheiber gets it right in an op-ed piece.
I do think they read the blogs, because I can see our narrative in these articles. As I’ve said before, the triangle is closing. Much thanks and praise to FDL, Markos, Glenn, MyDD, and all the others who have relentlessly presented this narrative–a narrative that has the priceless virtue of being not merely effective, but true.
AP: Lieberman files papers to get on ballot
Carpe diem, Pach. :)
i heart jane @ 34
Even better (now that the Clinton’s backing Ned):
Are you a Bill Clinton Democrat or a Joe Lieberman Democrat?
Congratulations to Jane, Christy, TRex and all the other FireDogLake regulars who gave every ounce of their devotion to this race. And, thanks to Senator Leiberman, it looks like there is three more months of extra hard work needed to get Mr. Lamont into the US senate.
That being said, Firedoglake is an important NATIONAL blog. Please Jane and Christy, do not forget about the rest of the nation! The Democrats will not gain control of the Senate, let alone the House, with just a Lamont win. Now please shift your focus and your followers energies to other parts of the country – Webb in Virginia, the Montana senate race, there are outside chances to pick up house seats in Idaho, even Wyoming (!), the “fighting dems” that are running for house seats across the country and more. Please don’t forget the big picture.
I predict that after Lieberman sees the next major poll he’ll bow out. If he can go graciously he may salvage a cabinet position in a future Democratic Administration.
It’s joey’s turn to cry, joey’s turn to cry, joey’s turn to cryyyayay – everybody now, yeah, it’s joey’s turn to cry…
Lina,
Radioactive to us, but to the GOP voters in CT, he would be more attractive. Joe did get a substantial amount of the vote, and while some of that will bleed away after the primary I think the GOP injection makes him a contender.
Congrats to everyone!
Barkeep! This rounds on me!
I have a hard time believing that a state that went for John Kerry in 2004 will vote for a Bush-backed Indep. Lieberman this Nov.
It just doesn’t compute.
Sunny at 19 – YES. Remind him of his statement about “no prizes for second place” every single day. Also remind him about how eager he was to concede in 11/04. Want to be good sports and all that. UGH.
Oh yes, remind Joe about his previous stands on losing.
angry_cyclone @ 25
Actually, it doesn’t bother me, though I understand your anger. Remember, the news (in theory) is about what’s unusual, and an incumbent senator losing is really unusual, even more so in a primary. I actually don’t think it’s a bad thing at this point to have lots of news stories about how Lieberman is the loser; it’ll kill any vestigial support and hasten his exit. We’ll have plenty of time for good news about Lamont after that.
I don’t post very often, but I just had to relate this story:
My 7 year old son watched the Lieberman faux-concession speech with me, and asked me to explain. I didn’t know what to say. We try so hard to get him to follow the rules, and here’s this man on TV blatantly rewriting the rules as he goes along.
I think everybody needs to ask the question:
WHAT DO WE TELL OUR CHILDREN, JOE?
Thank you for pointing out that the “bloggers” are real people with real concerns and that the blogosphere is about the only place in America where these concerns can be discussed.
In the 6 years under Bush I have felt really repressed. Our government is being run by fanaticals and voicing dissent has yielded terms like traitor, or today radical.
WEll, I am tired of being labeled just because I want a return to a two party system. Mr. Lamont win is a hopeful return to saner times and saner government.
Christy, if you want to amplify that idea today, the one in my comment, be my guest. I’m swamped with work today. :/
It IS truly a wonderful day in the neighborhood and I am one happy Nutmegger — and ready for the next phase of battle. Go Ned!! Thanks to all the out-of-staters for your good wishes and support.
Christy and Jane:
I was out of teh country and I come back to VICTORY! Yeah!
Three cheers for all who helped and for the sane CT voters! Finally the tide is changing.
Let’s work on making Ned a senator!
Lady Bug at 44 — we’ve got a great interview with Victoria Wulsin, who is going to kick Mean Jean Schmidt’s ass coming up soon in Blue America. (Which we do every Saturday — take a peek at the candidates we’ve covered thus far here.) Trust me when I say that our eyes are on the Karl Rove crying in his beer prize…
carpe diem ? the carps are dying? more Bush environmental disasters? global warming?
cyclone, 11:”They fall for that media definition of what bloggers are, tin foil hat ..
The MSM’s depiction of blogger and blogging as the rantings of liberal lunatics (”tin foil hats”) is based on fear and loathing. The best of the blogs (certainly not all) are challenging the MSM’s traditional turf and and influence. As such, responsible and insightful blogs directly challenge the MSN’s continued presumption of being “the voice of the people.” So what I am referring to is a second war, aside from the battle between blue and red states, the simmering and increasingly hot war between MSM and the bloggers. One difference between the two is that so far, the bloggers are NOT hostage to privileged power brokers and corporate money.
Bloggers should take heed: to keep on the side of the angels, they need to resist the lure that has entrapped the MSM, and not become hostage to money and entrenched power. For some blogs (not mentioning any names) this is going to be hard..especially when you hear of multimillion dollar investments in political blogs. That spells for a bad marriage.
I’m looking forward to seeing Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, Tom Delay, Don Imus and Dick Cheney in CT campaigning for the Independent Lieberman – the man who wants to heal the partisan divide.
First of all, thank you, FDLers for motivating me! I’ve written my two senators.
I only got to see a very short clip of Lieberman’s “concession” speech on CNN International here in Germany, but it included his words “I cannot and will not let that result stand.” I couldn’t believe what I was hearing!
To me, that’s not a rejection of the Democratic party, but of democracy itself.
I realize that he can now legally run under another party name, but I can’t stop thinking about those words, regardless of the context in which he meant them.
In a democracy, you don’t get to decide for yourself which election results are allowed to stand and which aren’t.
Hope I’m not repeating anything that’s already been mentioned — it’s been quite a challenge to keep up with all of you all night long!
Christy is right: the media need to understand that we bloggers are the media manifestation of a much larger people powered movement of American grassroots.
We are not the movers and shakers: we are the messengers.
i heart jane at 6:46:
Hee, hee! Yes!
Lady Bug @ 45
I know what you mean. I’ve been working on family members in Montana to take a closer look at Tester every chance I get. And we’re talking 14 possible votes. Anything I can do, I’ll do.
Up to now, one of the forces keeping Democrats in the snivel position (head firmly between knees, “Please don’t hurt me in the next election, Karl”) was fear of being targeted/swiftboated/Clelanded by the Republican thrashing machine in ‘06.
Ned Lamont has changed that dynamic. The new fear will be getting blindsided by the electorate. And that fear, let us hope, will put strength in the voices of Democratic candidates, fire in their campaigns and gonads in their pants.
If I had accurate polls telling me I could win an election I would get 7500 people from Connecticutt to sign a petition and I would run. I wouldn’t let anybody stop me. If he’s got the votes he’ll run. If he doesn’t, he won’t. I know it makes things harder, but that’s how it is. How do you spell Connecticutt? It looks wrong.
ragz @ 47
Thanks ragz. I’ll have that in my head all day *g*
Next Steps:
We all need to
1. Email or call Harry Reid and ask that Lieberman be stripped of all his committee assignments as he is no longer a Democrat.
2. Email or call our local Democratic representatives and strongly state our demand that they publicly support and endorse Ned Lamont as the Democratic candidate for Senate in Connecticut and denounce Lieberman’s betrayal of the party.
3. Brainstorm here at FDL about ALL possible ways to apply pressure to politicians who may be on the fence with regard to Lieberman. Now is the time, folks. We need to shape public opinion immediately before Lieberman can develop any sort of momentum. His selfish desire to get a “do-over” must be made dead on arrival.
4. Keep a running list of who has stood up for Ned Lamont as the Democratic nominee for Senate.
4. Also, as importantly, keep tabs on WHEN each Democrat came forward with an explicit endorsement of Ned Lamont.
We need to let Democrats know that they need to act FAST to get on the side of Lamont. Any delay will be noted and remembered for a long time to come. This is significant because such delays aid Lieberman by giving him time to shape the narrative in his favor.
Any Democrat in office needs to get on the public record YESTERDAY about Ned Lamont, in clear, forceful, and unambiguous terms. They must be made fully aware that if they sit on their hands regarding their support for Ned Lamont this race for ANY LENGTH OF TIME, we won’t forget about it.
If you haven’t done it already, please, Please, PLEASE write to harry Reid and ask him to strip Joe Lieberman of any and all committee assignments and associated perks for his ill-advised and defiant break with the party. Retribution for Joe should be swift, comprehensive, and emphatic. Then get on the horn and tell your elected officials to get behind Lamont in a big way-pronto.
Don’t let Joe-Mentum get beyond the bleeding phase.
Congratulations firedoglake! You played an instrumental role in a historic and important victory. Keep up the outstanding work.
Well bput Christy. Lieberman needs to bow out, and the sooner the better. Understandably his Texas sized ego will have a hard time coming around to this decision. The democratic “leadership” needs to force his hand soon; get this next fight over quickly so as not to further enhance the perception and reality of the party as one in disarray.
The thugs will be all over this quickly, attempting to characterize the vote as a sign that the dems are a party of left wing-anti war wackos, when in fact this was a large vote and, by definition the majority of such a large vote must represent a middle or moderate way.
That the country, the moderate and middle of the country is (by 60%) this morning in favor of pulling troops out of Iraq will not dissuade the Rovians from playing the distorted weak-on-terrorism, cut-and-run card. Keep the big lie rolling.
If Liberman can’t understand this simple set of affairs and get his ego out of the way, he deserves increasing contempt. Or, if he’s so deluded that he can only hear his own echo chamber he needs to be immediately given ECT and put on Zyprexa.
I tried to pose this questions last night but was never able to get through.
The big question still seems to be what will the labor unions do? What will the national NARAL do? And most importantly, what will the CBC do? Will all the inner city churches that supported Joe (why why why ) still go for him?
Will most dems come over for Lamont? Joe is thinking that all those who voted for him will still vote for him in Nov. It is turning those votes to Lamont that will win the day. Joe will get all lobbyist votes, republican votes, AIPAC votes and… and… big question it seems.
hmmm… Motley Fool in the house.
Fool, let’s talk sometime about giving voice to the progressive small business comunity somehow. If you’re interested or have ideas, email me, please.
Russert is coming up on MSNBC with his analyses, FWIW.
Redshift @ 52
I see what your saying. And makes perfect sense. I’ll keep that in mind.
I want to scream when pundits & msm infer that get out of Iraq war voices are lefty & fringe. Now, all of a sudden, the Lamont win is an anti-war message to dem party. So, msm, all those polls before yesterday showing majority of americans want out didn’t really count? And no one can tell me that repub & dem officeholders haven’t been hearing this from a lot of their constituents at home. The msm seems to look at the polls & say, “Well, that doesn’t follow the script. We know better what most americans want.”
Lady Bug, welcome to FDL — you’re JUST our kind of grrl, it’s clear, so fold your cute li’l wings and stay a while!
Re: “Lieberman Lost” in the media -
That was the NYT photo last night. This morning’s story feature’s Ned’s photo.
Big ol’ welcome to you too, Fool (though I seem to remember your being here before … dunno, maybe it’s my hangover)!
To amplify Pach.
What the blogs have done is to allow regular old people who are eaking out their living like everyone else — rushing kids to school so they can get to work on time, running home to fix dinner and create a safe and happy home for their children, using the weekends and evenings to do all the work that didn’t happen during the week like laundry and cleaning and Doctor appointments and still trying to play with the kids and have a good relationship with the spouse — the blogs
and this blog in particular
give people like that (us) a place to chat with similarly minded folks in the moments we snatch from our days. We have come together and, not surprisingly, we are stronger for it. Let us see, this morning we had Connecticut and Florida and Maine and Boston, and NOrth Carolina and Japan and Italy and Indiana and New Yourk all speaking together in a voice of common action. That is what the blogs give us: community.
Watch out, DC! The audience just took the stage!
Congratulations to Ned and the citizens of Connecticut!! To bad Joe plans to be gum on the shoe of the Democratic party. If the people who voted for him really listened to his concession/campaign speech last night, they know he is a man without conviction, and will do whatever it takes to serve himself.
Too much Nedly goodness to link individually, so just stroll on over to http://www.huffingtonpost.com and take a whiff. Sweeeeet.
Last nite on WTIC radio Lowell Weicker, Jr. made it clear he was adamant about getting Indy’s for Lamont full throttle.
John Kerry has also issued a statement supporting Ned Lamont. I’ll keep putting these up as I get them:
Below is a statement by John Kerry on Ned Lamont’s victory in the Connecticut Democratic Senate primary.
Kerry said on July 5th that he would support the Democratic nominee in Connecticut, and he supports Ned Lamont, the Democratic nominee for the United States Senate.
“After an intense and competitive primary season, Connecticut Democrats have chosen their nominee and they’ve made a strong statement about the current course in Iraq which is failing our troops. I strongly support Ned Lamont for the United States Senate.
“I’ve worked with Joe Lieberman since our days in college together, and I respect his many contributions to our public life. But the Democratic Party stands for something, and the Democratic Party in Connecticut has made a choice. That choice will matter in November to the direction of our Party and the
direction of our country. The events of the past months make even more clear the
differences Democratic leadership would make for our country on Iraq, in making America safer, in having an economy that works for everyone, and in achieving energy independence. That’s who we are as Democrats, and that’s what we’ll be fighting for. It’s time for all Democrats to come together to support Ned Lamont. It’s time for Democrats to unite.”
Watch out, DC! The audience just took the stage!
YESSSSS
immanentize @ 79
Amen. This community energizes me to help make a difference like never before.
(Tennessee community here)
lotus @ 78
Thanks Lotus for the welcome (and Christy too for responding to my comment). I’ve been lurking here for a few months and have been blown away by the quality of writing on this blog. Decided this morning it was time to jump into the pool and start swimming with the rest of you FDLers. I have to say the water feels pretty darn good.
Hey Joe, better put your hands out to catch the anvil all your buddies are heaving your way.
Jayzuz, of all the days to be too busy to blog. . . !!! GRRRR.
I watched that capitulation speech of Lieberman’s last night, and there are a couple of things.
1) It was the only clip carried. Nothing about Lamont’s win, only Joe’s losing.
2) Joe didn’t just say that he would run as an independant, he said he would run as an independant “DEMOCRAT”
3) If Joe runs as an independant, what that will do is split the Democratic party in Conn. and hand over the election to whichever republican du jour is running.
4) When Joe runs as an independant it would be interesting, and enlightening, but no surprise to find that the money supporting him comes from the Republican party/lobbyists.
5) He was whining BTW – felt good
6) I’ve lived in New England – I love New England. The people there give me hope. Yay!
Does Joe have 7500 signatures and have they been verified?
How many are registered Republicans?
Can he use funds generated by Democrats to run as an Independent?
He should have to fight for his bid to run as an Independent – every move he makes from this point forward should be challenged. His rabid need for power will further alienate him from Democrats in CT.
And another question: When he submits these signatures, is he automatically an Independent? If so, Senate Democrats need to immediately treat him as an Independent.
If you haven’t had a crack at NYT’s lede editorial this morning, here ’tis:
Revenge of the Irate Moderates
Call Senator Minority Leader Harry Reid at 202-224-3542 to ask that he strip Lieberman of any and all committee assignments and associated perks for his act of defiance against the Democratic Party by running against the duly elected Democratic Party nominee Ned Lamont in the general election.
Full-court press, people. Keep the pressure on them 24/7/365.
Phew…stayed up WAY too late combing through all the CT race feedback. How absolutely breathtaking all of it is!
Best video: CTBob’s minute of pure joy — I tear up every time I’ve watched it.
Best commentary: Spazeboy’s wrap-up (sorry, not going to link here so I can get through faster)
Thank you all, Jane, Christy, Pach, TRex, all the FirePups for supporting this in so many ways.
Thank you Nutmeggers for having the courage and tenacity to b*tchslap entitlement and entrenchment into next week, and for giving our democracy the kick in the *ss it has needed.
Thank you to all the other people-powered races that didn’t quite make it, but blazed the trail.
And thank you, Howard Dean, for reminding us so very often: You have the power to take your country back.
OT (you knew I’d do it eventually)
Justice Kennedy:
“We are at another turning point in the history of the law … The freedom of the next generation hangs in the balance.”
How about
R U a Lamont Democrat or a Lieberman Egomaniac?
Woodpecker @99
And you think Joe Lieberman being there3 makes us safer!!??? she asked incredulously.
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Sounds as if someone is a LITTLE cranky this morning…..
My advice to you, take some Bromo and then hit yourself in the head with a large inflatable clown hammer repeatedly, repeating to yourself “It’s only a movie, it’s only a movie….”
The handwriting is on the wall for 2006:
why all the concern (quoting the times article) among the senate leadership about not causing lieberman to feel his back is up against the wall? why all the deference at this point? would we treat a cancerous tumor this way after the operation to successfully remove it? there is no wall behind lieberman, only an open doorway, or a window (hopefully on the first floor) and they can just push him through it. and toss his hat into the street after him.
congrats CT…from TX! like your style
I’m a lurker who’s been spending time each day for several months now, checking your site because it’s soooo informative, right on, and even gives a real sense of community. Most of all, it gives me hope that change is possible, albeit with a LOT of hard work, every day, for a long time to come. Thank you to each of the participants here- educators, really, and friends. You are the ones bringing that change about, as is evident in last night’s win for Ed Lamont.
My heartiest congratulations to you all, along with sincerest thanks,and major Congratulations on Lamont’s win last night!
Could respond to many of the comments on this thread, but will limit myself to a hearty “Hear! Hear!” to Ladybug’s suggestion at #45. Much dialogue could come from that. Let it flow.
This is good news, a victory to celebrate. Thank you for all your hard work. Now on to November!