Comments on: GOTV http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/ Firedoglake weblog Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:44:27 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: Cozumel http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232297 Cozumel Wed, 09 Aug 2006 02:07:18 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232297 <p>U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary<br /> 575 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 76.87%<br /> Name Party Votes Pct<br /> Lamont, Ned Dem 109,239 51.76<br /> Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 101,818 48.24</p> U.S. Senate – - Dem Primary
575 of 748 Precincts Reporting – 76.87%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 109,239 51.76
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 101,818 48.24

]]> By: Knut Wicksell http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232268 Knut Wicksell Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:18:00 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232268 <p>It is going to be a wipe-out. We are witnessing the first stage of a Revolution! It took a long time in coming, but technology has finally caught up with television. We have another chance.</p> It is going to be a wipe-out. We are witnessing the first stage of a Revolution! It took a long time in coming, but technology has finally caught up with television. We have another chance.

]]> By: . . . and your little dog, too http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232267 . . . and your little dog, too Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:17:27 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232267 <p><a href="http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com">http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com</a></p> <p>This is the fastest site for me, and doesn’t take long to load.</p> http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com

This is the fastest site for me, and doesn’t take long to load.

]]> By: -ck- http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232266 -ck- Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:17:10 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232266 <p><a href="http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/and-the-winner-is-5/">New Thread — And The Winner Is — NED LAMONT!!!</a></p> New Thread — And The Winner Is — NED LAMONT!!!

]]> By: lotus http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232256 lotus Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:16:19 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232256 <p>189 of 748 Precincts Reporting - <b>25.27%</b><br /> <b>Lamont</b> 40,934 <b>55.09</b><br /> <b>Lieberman</b> 33,375 <b>44.91</b> </p> <p><a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2006/by_state/CT_Page_0808.html?SITE=CTHARELN&SECTION=POLITICS">http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/f.....N=POLITICS</a></p> 189 of 748 Precincts Reporting – 25.27%
Lamont 40,934 55.09
Lieberman 33,375 44.91

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/f…..N=POLITICS

]]> By: OldCoastie http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232254 OldCoastie Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:16:10 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232254 <p>from DKos and PsiFighter liveblog:</p> <blockquote><p>Another update: 32% of precincts in, 49K for Lamont, 42K for Lieberman></p></blockquote> from DKos and PsiFighter liveblog:

Another update: 32% of precincts in, 49K for Lamont, 42K for Lieberman>

]]> By: Cujo359 http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232246 Cujo359 Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:12:46 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232246 <p><b>Candidate Votes Vote %</b><br /> Joe Lieberman 22,898 44%<br /> Ned Lamont 29,463 56%</p> <p>with 17% of precincts reporting [WTNH at 8:59pm EDT]</p> Candidate Votes Vote %
Joe Lieberman 22,898 44%
Ned Lamont 29,463 56%

with 17% of precincts reporting [WTNH at 8:59pm EDT]

]]> By: nonwhiteperson http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232244 nonwhiteperson Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:12:15 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232244 <p>Lieberman was trailing with <b>43</b> percent, or 7,199 votes, to political novice Ned Lamont’s <b>57</b> percent, or 9,399 votes, with just <b>6 percent of precincts reporting</b>.</p> <p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/fc/us/midterm_elections_2006">http://news.yahoo.com/fc/us/midterm_elections_2006</a></p> Lieberman was trailing with 43 percent, or 7,199 votes, to political novice Ned Lamont’s 57 percent, or 9,399 votes, with just 6 percent of precincts reporting.

http://news.yahoo.com/fc/us/midterm_elections_2006

]]> By: OldCoastie http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232235 OldCoastie Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:11:21 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232235 <p>from courant/ap:</p> <blockquote><p>160 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 21.39%<br /> Name Party Votes Pct<br /> Lamont, Ned Dem 35,942 56.01<br /> Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 28,227 43.99</p></blockquote> from courant/ap:

160 of 748 Precincts Reporting – 21.39%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 35,942 56.01
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 28,227 43.99

]]> By: -ck- http://firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232237 -ck- Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:11:09 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/08/08/gotv/#comment-232237 <p><em>The Whole World is Watching!!! </em></p> <p>The Whole World is Watching!!!</p> <p>The Whole World is Watching!!!</p> <p>Go NED!!! Give ‘Em Hell, Tiger!!!</p> The Whole World is Watching!!!

The Whole World is Watching!!!

The Whole World is Watching!!!

Go NED!!! Give ‘Em Hell, Tiger!!!

]]>