
I sincerely apologize to anyone who was genuinely offended by the choice of images accompanying my blog post today on the Huffington Post. It's also important to note that I do not, nor have I ever worked for Ned Lamont's campaign. However, at their request, I removed the image earlier today.
Unfortunately, Senator Lieberman's campaign has used this in attempt to hurt Ned and score political points, mustering their own faux indignation in attempt to further distract from the issues important to the voters of Connecticut.
For weeks, Senator Lieberman has attempted to woo African Americans by pretending to be someone he clearly is not. Meanwhile, his campaign has liberally distributed race-baiting fliers that have the "paid for by" Joe's campaign disclaimer at the bottom, lying to the press about their intended recipients.
But for some reason, more questions have been asked about me, a blogger. With so much at stake this election, is the choice of images used by a mere supporter really newsworthy?
To the extent that rightwing Republicans like Michelle Malkin are trying to harm Ned Lamont with this ginned up controversy by "defending" his opponent with these absurd charges of racism --- I regret it and I invite them to take it up with the person who did it, namely me. I answer to nobody and I operate entirely on my own volition. If you have a problem with something I've written, you know where to find me.
But perhaps it's also time people started asking why the Republicans suddenly feel they have a dog in this fight in the first place. First David Horowitz, then the College Republicans and now the rightwing blogosphere are all championing a particular Democrat in a Democratic primary. Perhaps they have come to admire what seem to be ever increasing Rovian tactics, such as that flyer accusing Lamont of being a racist (which inspired the satirical graphic in the first place.) Whatever it is, it certainly should give Connecticut voters pause as they consider whether they are really voting for a Democrat in the Democratic primary on August 8th.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
FITZ!
Rootz,Baby!Rootz!
Nelson Mandela was a fighter and a peacemaker!
Jane!
truth.
Yay Jane!!!
Way to step up, Jane!
Jane,
Please remember that you are dealing with bottom-of-the-barrell scumbags. White trash. Lieberman was the guy who created the impression that somehow democrats were in favor of a war based on a pack of lies. Now the NeoCons will do everything in their power to protect him.
Lieberman betrayed the interests of the American people and deserves to be booted out of office. Jane, keep up your crusade…and know you are on the side of all patriotic America people!
Dang, I didn’t get to see it. But here’s a photo from this afternoon in Newtown, Connecticut. Joe wouldn’t come out of the building until after we left, hee, hee, hee…
http://thumbsnap.com/v/F3N8tvFu.jpg
Sorry I’ve been away most of the day.
Did I miss anything?
I guess that rumor about Joe admitting his mistakes about Iraq weren’t true, but at least you’ve set a good example.
Which he won’t follow.
Jane Hamsher @ 9
LOL,bidness as usual.LMAO.
cool pic http://thumbsnap.com/v/F3N8tvFu.jpg , Lakezorian ! Workers of the World, Unite!
Jane, WTNH said they tried to contact you regarding this. My first thought was for you to contact them and explain exactly as you did here. However, now I’m not sure if it’s worth it or if that would feed the story more.
It’s quite possible that it will just blow off the radar, but I’ve also seen things not addressed get worse. It’s one helluva judgement call.
What are the odds that we hear about “Lamont blogger posts racist graphic” from the AP reporter tomorrow?
And what are the odds that we hear about Joe hiring the college republicans?
Jane!
You might’ve missed this item on Joe’s post-loss planning:
http://politicalwire.com/archi....._week.html
I wonder if he’ll be hiring Karl Rove to run the Joe Party for him. It might be his only hope.
Jane,
I don’t expect any of the Malkin’s of the world to try to take you on.Much easier to rant to themselves.
I didn’t see the graphic,but it says much to me that you removed it and regret it.
Expect this to be a major issue for those that want to talk about anything but the real issues,i.e.the Leiberman camp.
Jane Hamsher @ 10
Nah ; )
Jane, the image was in bad taste, but I am doubly proud of you for owning up to it.
when Joe loses, is he going to hire Lynde England to get tough finally?
I’ve been thinking lately as the world just falls apart around us all, how the GOP, in the lead-up to the 2000 coup d
‘etatelection, that there were going to be grown-ups in charge for a change. Well, I have never seen such a bunch of incompentant petulant little boys — like Joe & Bush who really think kool aid is real — running the show in all my years.When I see and hear Ned, I feel a sense of relief. He comes across like a sane, mature human being!
Jane Hamsher @ 10
ROTFL! No, not a thing. Nothing to look at over here.
Just a little bit of people freakin’, that’s all. You might want to check back a few threads.
Um, and with regards to my previous post, it made the local TV news.
I stand behind you Jane.
You might’ve missed this quote from Thomas Ricks, author of Fiasco, on KO a few minutes ago:
A candidate for a future Book Salon?
Jane, you brave woman you. Owned up and did the right thing, unlike some I can think of.
The prude in me was mildly offended by the graphic. I know to expect Darkblack’s images to be challenging; I often cringe at his taste while LMAO.
But I am far more offended on a daily basis by the hypocrites giving you a hard time. (Can you believe there was a time when their meme was “What’s wrong with hypocrisy, anyway?)
a confession, Jane: I tried to use my tech skills to hack in and remove that photo quickly but the sysadmins have done their work well in bullet-proofing. Oh well…
I went digging around and finally saw the pic over at Malkin’s site.
I liked it. I would have kept it up, but, yeah, if the Lamont campaign asks you to take it down, I guess politeness would demand you do that if just for Lamont’s sake.
But next time, take a lesson from the Republican playbook. DON’T APOLOGIZE. GO ON THE ATTACK. It might not work in foreign policy, but it works well in politics. Stand by your ad, and rub it in their faces as if it was the best idea any graphics-maker has ever had. Explain why it’s such a great ad, and look like you’re enjoying yourself while you do it.
Jane Hamsher @
10
No. Well, Hopey posted an awesome YouTube!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSbZcAiVBSc
Jane:
I have to say, when you make a mistake in judgement, it is a doozy… Keep your chin up and keep swinging. - Dilbatt
al-Scooter @
25
Whoa.
OOHH look over there . . . . something shiny . . . .
God forbid the wingers should deal with real life and death issues like the war, like poor people caught in the vise of credit card debt, like rape victims being told to go somewhere else for help.
There are SO many issues that Ned is good on and Joe isn’t. Let’s get this train back on the express track and show them what a candidate that isn’t bought and paid for by lobbyists can do.
This is so bizarre. The number of total votes is hardly enough to sneeze at, and the right poitical machine is throwing the kitchen sink at it. They are sending the writers, the talkers, the bloggers, and some fuckhead college kids to work for a democrat. And what the fuck do Boxer and Clinton think they are doing.
There are some Republican senators in some deep shit in November and the machine gives two shits about them.
I’m outraged by the outrage. :)
They will try to use it to change the debate but your quick response will hinder their efforts. I believe the post election planning is now in full swing and that is where they are now doing their work.
Rallies with only one or two attendees is a strong message.
I clicked on that article just before a nap this afternoon. *yawn*. Malkontent gets to have a little evil fun. What’s next?
OT Wouldn’t it be fun to meet the Young Republicans coming to work for their favorite Democrat with a big Operation yellow Elephant outreach? We could do Leiberman’s people a favor by setting up tables for military recruiters outside his offices and events.
Jane!
darkblack!
I don’t post often and hope I don’t sound like a concern troll now, but wanted to throw in my two cents.
While politics needs passion, we always have to remember it’s a minefield as well. To be inclusive, we have to remember that what is said within the “family” circle is not always appropriate to the less committed we also have to reach, because our concern is with them as well as those firmly on board.
Still, even making mistakes reflects the human attributes that bring people to Ned.
darkblack, where are you?
most of the hired LieberYouth have no idea that LieberHawk is a major backer of the War on Iraq…
Jane,
Please send our love and affection to darkblack. No one meant to be angry at him, we just want so badly for Ned to win, we don’t want anything to even accidentally or unintentionally hurt the cause.
Jane!!!!!
OT- so this is from M/ aka Valley Girl- Jane, the f***ing grant proposal finally got turned in today. I just made plane reservations to go to New Haven- arriving Sat leaving Thurs morning, staying with my best/oldest friend in Branford. I sure hope that we get to meet up sometime there. And, I am assuming that TRex will make it too, love to meet him. My friend is going to send me info to link me up with her local GOTV group- I’ll work on that while she’s at work. What’s the best way to find you in New Haven? M/VG
Malkin is just mad because we have all noticed just how cheap and trashy looking her outfits are compared to Coulter’s.
And that’s not saying much lol.
Don’t worry Michelle, I hear Tonya Harding has some trailer trash hand-me-downs you can pick up on the cheap.
Fuck you scarhill.
Apologize to Jane right now, or I might say something I regret.
Oh, BTW, my friend opined “I think he (Ned) is gonna win”. She has good political instincts but… ya never know
maybe the republicans are helping out because they want to reassure Sen. Lieberman that it is just a short ride from his current platform to theirs if the democratic voters don’t treat him properly at the primary. Given that he feels violated by this whole primary challenge, and doesn’t have any problems with short rides.
(looking like a bitter humor day, over here)
UptownNYChick @ 37
I love this idea. Wish I could help.)
chill about the trollerie ! it only takes a second to zap them…
Ohhh, Internet Toobz Cage Match!!!
In one corner, Whiney Ass Anchor Baby Michelle Macalang!!!
Cheered on by the cheeto stained merde flinging knuckle draggers of Red State, LGF, and Joe Lieberman’s campaign team!!!
In this corner, True Blue Jane Hamsher, champion of all that good and light, and defender of the American Way!!!
Cheered on Kossacks, Eschatonians, and squadrons of rabid venomous lambkin poodles!!!
I’ll bet a US Grant that Ms Macalang will be dragged out feet first, and Ms Hamsher will be fresh as driven snow!!!
And, uh — Lamont 64% Lieberman 32% — HoJo has a good cry, and then endorses Lamont on Tuesday Night. Then, all of the LieberBucks K-Street pimps have a really good cry — they’ve lost their favorite Ho!!!
Jane,
Malkin is frightened of you. That’s why she chose to distort your comments. Keep up the good work.
From the previous thread:
John Casper at 4:34 pm - I strongly suspected that Joshua was a Lieberman troll,
I usually have a pretty good nose for those, but for some reason that never occured to me in this instance. Oh Gawd, I even thanked the guy for bringing it to our attention. Thanks for the clarification.
Also, there was at least one call for Darkblack to apologize for the graphic, and I don’t think that’s necessary.
meta #31:
Mr. Ricks did not have the demeanor of a happy man. After all the crap he’s waded through to research the book, I’d say controlled righteous indignation tinged with weariness was more like it.
He also said that he’s most gratified by the e-mails he’s received from our troops in Iraq. Lotsa thank-yous for telling it like it is and not a single negative comment.
Eureka Springs, AR @ 49
The General should be notified, he is an Operation Yellow Elephant expert.
Jane:
I did see a link to your post on Drudgereport earlier today. It mentioned Huffingtonpost and had the graphic but took me directly to your post. Since someone over on Huffingtonpost is saying that it was never up there on Drudge you might want to know if you do not already.
al-scooter 54
Regarding Ricks, I’d feel lots better about him if he had started writing about this stuff when it was going on rather than waiting 3 years into the war.
Hey, you know that graphic . . . no, not that graphic, the one at the top of this post.
Somebody or other pointed out that the Repugnant logo has the upside-down stars of the dark side.
Our Dem donkey, however, has ‘em right side up, like the patriotic little donkey he is. :)
M/VG in CT !! Yes!
Come back swinging, Jane. Don’t let them get us off topic. I wouldn’t talk about it for another minute except to say that a minstrel show is what that Clinton drop-in was–perhaps a different graphic would have made the point more deftly.
I saw it myself on Drudge — thats when I knew the Mighty Wurlitzer was gearing up for poo-flinging …
“…take it up with the person who did it, namely me.”
I didn’t see the graphic.
But let me say… we do so admire folks who take responsibility for what they do. And permit me to say if you will, Jane Hamsher, that it is a common trait of us here in the great state of Oklahoma to admire those such as yourself who say to everyone “…take it up with the person who did it, namely me.” For what it’s worth.
Thanks Eureka- I am so looking forward to it. This will be the first fun I’ve had in 4 mos!!!
Eureka Springs, AR @ 59
jail4wncrew @ 55
The pic was on Drudge but he pulled it after it was pulled on Huffpo. I don’t see the big deal with it personally, but politically, it was best to pull it IMO
Oh for God’s sake. That graphic is totally on target and funny. That’s exactly what Lieberman is trying to say:”I’m black like you, and the Big Dog is on my side, and that’s all you need to know, so just vote for me, ok?”
This politically correct crap is getting very old. I think we better stop apologizing and just keep attacking. That’s what the righties do, and it’s easy to see how it works for them.
Side note…..Malkin calls Jane a bottom feeder. Takes one to know one, I’d say!
I wonder why Drudge pulled it? It’s so out of character.
RevDeb @ 57
Exactly my thought, RevDeb. It’s like tweety deciding five a half years too late that America really does need a president with a clue, instead of a codpiece.
Huh? From that Political Wire article:
Pungent. Something smells, that’s for sure…
Jenny from the Blog @ 66
Cause his link no longer contained the pic he said was there! LOL
marksb @ 69
or else they have “pungent” confused with “pugnacious”
I really don’t give much of a shit that Drudge had it and lost it and Malkin now has it. Seeing it shown on local CT TV news wasn’t great.
However, I sense it will just blow on by as just another mark against those nasty internets bloggers. They did, at least, correctly state that it had nothing to do with Lamont’s campaign.
and Holy Joe is often described as plangent (look it up!)
Cozumel -
That explains it. BWAHAHAHA!
Is that what you meant? Jane is no bottom feeder. But, for someone of Malkin’s ilk, it’s easy to project one’s own motives and character onto others.
StuInCa @ 67
Since you’ve filed your apology, don’t mention it again. You’ll only extend the story.
M- You deserve it! Have fun and Nederize.)
Mike J, back so soon from your white supremacy meeting?
Have you had a chance to read the posts Jane commissioned on racism? I’m interested in what you think of them.
Hey, Mike J, I missed the FDL post on Mel’s anti-semitic spill. Do you have a link?
marksb @ 70
And HOW, precisely do they plan to “take the fight to Lamont?” What do they have left in their bag of dirty tricks?
I understand that so far they have turned in 817 signatures. They’ve got a few to go and they will probably be trying to get them on Sat. Maybe the out of state young pugs will be working the mall crowds. Is it legal for them to do so?
Some Lieberman supporters keep coming by (although always after dark:
http://thumbsnap.com/v/BlVs1CxV.jpg
Jane,
These things happen. Don’t worry about it.
You’ve been doing a great job overall. Ned rocks… .:)
It unfortunately made it on the local nightly news.
It’s a very silly controversy if you ask me.
please dont feed the fucking trolls … mkay?
.
.
Channel 8 News (I’m not sure what its call letters are) picked up this story, unfortunately. They called it a new low in the campaign. Of course, my heart sank when I heard that. They showed a shot of the picture and made clear that Jane was not a paid member of Lamont’s campaign and that the campaign did not approve of the picture.
Then they went to Joe to get the martyr’s quote. You would think that after 18 years in the Senate and decades in politics that the guy would have more to say than the drab, whiny crap he’s known for. Nevertheless, he whined about how the blogs are out to get him and called this par for the course.
I know Jane meant no offense and I’m glad that she has apologized for this. However, these guys have nothing else to run on at this point. So you can bet we’re gonna hear more about this. It’s interesting who is stepping up to the plate though. I saw it on Drudge, Malkin, the usuall Wingnut suspects. I’m wondering whether their defending him actually will backfire. Is this who he wants as his defenders at this point?
Maybe we could link some of these Joetrolls to websites where they can sign up for his war too.
It would serve two purposes, bolstering the ranks and keeping up the “good fight.”
And it would improve the discourse at home.
alScooter, I did see him on Chas Rose and I was very moved by his straight talk. He didn’t appear to have an agenda, except to get out the information he learned from the troops and their commanders. He’s right that one of Rummy’s shortfalls is that he planned a coup d’etat and not a war. Other good points - Looting was significant because it sent a message that Americans were disrespectful of Iraqi society, eroding confidence in the occupation. Grace period was spring 2003 when opportunity evaporated and then the Baathist Party became influencial. The lack of coherence of American policies on the civilian side and the policies on the military side proved fatal. Bremer de-baathification created a disaffected class of military and drove them underground, and military cutting off weapons promoted insurgency to regain power. And as far as finandes – there was no cut off of money from Syria.
So I agree, it might be a good candidate for a salon.
I tried to post this at HuffPo but couldn’t because I can’t remember my user name there… but racism is an action/institutional structure which has a negative impact upon people based upon the color of their skin. The Joe/Minstrel blackface used a well-known historically racist reference/image to make a point about Joe Lieberman. The point it made was not racist. Whether or not Lieberman’s behavior is racist I leave to others to ponder.
The fact that all those folks at HuffPo are yelling “racism” shows a fundamental craziness and desire to use “racism-yelling” as a political ploy. They don’t seem to know what racism actually is — and think that any reference to/use of/ race in any way shape or form is racist. Colbert btw does a wonderful send up of this in his “I dont’ see color” routines.
That all being said, I admire your retraction and remarks, given the wingnuts being who and as they are. It was just too complex an idea for many in this country which is totally confused and dishonest on this issue.
The people who are calling your graphic racist are basically the same people who would call Dave Chappell racist. They are people who want to keep race out of our current discourse. The important issue is that black face has an important history in our society, and it is far more dangerous to ignore it (which is what we most often do) than to recognize that it was (and continues on a subliminal level) and important issue that we must continue to bring up in a modern context. It is important to remember that the initial reason for black face was segregation. White entertainers pretended to be black in order to engage in a safe form of their music and dance. The white public was allowed the enjoy the fruits of what was basically a slave culture without having to face the reality of it. In essence I believe that you could make the same argument for Joe Lieberman and a number of Democratic/centrist politicians. They attempt to enjoy the fruits of the black voters while at the same time making black issues safe for white voters. This is what leads to a frustrating disenfranchisement of a minority population.
It was an important graphic and I hope we get to talk about it more. As for Malkin and the other conservatives, they remind me of Colbert at his most satiric when he tells his guests he is completely color blind, that there is no longer any such thing as racism in America. I think the rightwing bloggers should be asked exactly why the picture is racist. Watch them tremble if they are forced to face reality for even a moment.
meta at 29,
I liked Hope’s YouTube! I gotta send that to several people.
Peterr - just now back. My 5 minutes is apparently way up. Thank you.
It is interesting to see what it takes to get the rightwing bloggers going. It certainly is not the arguments by the left, but a harmless caricature. It shows the way they are thinking, aware that the neocon arguments are completley worn out and useless, that they are proven wrong by the messes in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon. So lacking any real argument, they are focusing on Jane’s caricature, which hopefully serves as a lightning rod to Ned Lamonts campaign.
John Campanelli @ 85
Works for me.
MAY I STRONGLY ENDORSE *ilson’s COMMENT AT 84 or thereabouts (5:54): “please dont feed the fucking trolls … mkay?” It just makes the mod job all that much more difficult, and I think the next few days are gonna be hard on the mods. PLEASE.
Actually, upon reflection, and in association with all my other commentary on it today, there’s another lesson here.
Take heed, if they can’t take on Lamont directly, they’ll take on the netroots that support him and try and create an association to his campaign. You know their just itching to dismiss the bloggers as screaming, rabid lambs, but it’s even better if they can imply some sort of direct association to Lamont.
Hey M/VG!!
Missed ya!
Jane
Never fear! This looks like a job for [duh! duh! duh!] Operation Yellow Elephant!
Another day goes by without Joe discussing the issues.
UP- thanks. Likewise!
rudy, I really really like your 5:56.
Your Senate inaction:
August 2, 2006
Sessions Amendment S.Amdt. 4775 to H.R. 5631 (Defense Appropriations 2007)
Purpose: To provide $1,829,100,000 for the Army National Guard for the construction of 370 miles of triple-layered fencing, and 461 miles of vehicle barriers along the southwest border.
Status: Agreed to
Vote: 94 Yeas 3 Nays 3 Not Voting
Nays: Feingold (D-WI), Hagel (R-NE), Jeffords (I-VT)
Comments: WTF?! Maybe we could have some nifty guard towers with floodlights and machine guns, just saying.
Dodd Amdt. No. 4819 to H.R. 5631 (Defense Appropriations 2007)
Purpose: To make available an additional $6,700,000,000 to fund equipment reset requirements resulting from continuing combat operations, including repair, depot, and procurement activities.
Status: Agreed to
Vote: 97 Yeas 0 Nays 3 Not Voting
Comments: Addresses the wear and tear on the military’s equipment which the Administration had underfunded.
Motion to Table Durbin Amdt. No. 4781 to H.R. 5631 (Defense Appropriations 2007)
Purpose: To appropriate, with an offset, an additional $2,000,000 for Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army for the improvement of imaging for traumatic brain injuries
Status: Agreed to
Vote: 54 Yeas 43 Nays 0 Not Voting
Comments: Feingold voted Yea to table i.e. torpedo the amendment and was the only Democrat to do so. The amount is peanuts and it is a little like voting against puppies.
August 1, 2006
S. 3711 Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006
Purpose: A bill to enhance the energy independence and security of the United States by providing for exploration, development, and production activities for mineral resources in the Gulf of Mexico.
Status: Passed
Vote: 71 Yeas 25 Nays 4 Not Voting
Comments: This bill will allow deep sea drilling off the coast of Florida.
Oh, and one more thing. By definition a white person cannot claim that an act is racist - that is actually racist because it usurps the last power of the racially stereotyped group. Until some black people come out and claim the picture is racist tell everybody to shut the hell up.
Jane Hamsher - the Dorothy Thompson of our era - funny, fearless, fabulous and stellar futurologist. That’s right little concern trolls, reach for your dictionaries.
And, oh I almost forgot to add Kobe’s mistress is also - hands down - the freaking haberdasher fashion czarina of the internet tubes.
Who knew soft wooly little Burberry hats keep heads cool, even in the summertime. ;~)
LieberYouth — after your $60/day sugartit dries up on August 9th, checkout http://goarmy.com — Joe would so approve!
Much as it pained me, I did take a look at Malkin’s
shitesite earlier today. Jane, she links to the amazon.com listing for your book! Hope that generates some sales for that fine piece of work.(To be perfectly clear, it was for Killer Instinct, NOT the NBK novelization…)
Thank you John Casper — you have been nice to me twice today and are encouraging me to stop lurking or rather to keep talking.
And Wilbur - yes!!!
-ck- 50
OK, maybe I’m being too sensitive, or too uptight, but the put-downs are really starting to wear on me.
Twin sets from Old Navy - - fine; trailer trash - - fine; knuckle-dragging - - if the shoe fits . . . .
But Cheeto-stained fingers? Leave my Cheetos alone! Waahhh! I LOVE Cheetos! Does this mean I can’t be one of the kool kidz, now?
Pout. Cheeto Lovers Unite!
Gimme a C! Gimme an H! Gimme an E! Gimme an E! Gimme a T! Gimme an O! What’ve you got? CHEETOS! Yaayyyyyy!!
Anyway, why do you think God made baby wipes? It wasn’t just because Monk is neurotic or because babies poop their pants.
CHEETOS FOREVER!!
I would imagine it’s simply a diversionary tactic by the wingers. If they’re all pointing to something they expect you to be distracted and look at what they’re pointing to.
The fact that Joe is so staunchly supported by wingers and Republicans alike tells me that he truly *is not* a Democrat. Because the elected Republicans and wingers *hate* Democrats and make no bones about it.
Joe’s abandonment of his constituents and of the principles of the Democratic party are what they don’t want you to look at. They want to keep their favorite enabler in place.
Kiss. Kiss. Kiss.
When Joe cheer-led us into this inhuman, illegal war, resulting in the loss of tens of thousands of innocent life, yet without any remorse, he was just being “principled” and “transparently the most kind-hearted, well-intentioned of men”.
When Joe accused people who questioned the Iraq war as unpatriotic, he was further more “without question, one of the finest men”.
When Joe depicted Ned as an animal, they were just having a little fun.
Now, when bloggers criticized Joe, then it was all about “hate”. When Jane posted a satiric graphic, it was all about “racism”.
As a minority myself, I am totally disgusted with Lieberman’s self-righteousness and self-entitlement.
urban pirate @ 96
Arrrrghhhhh!
Can the CT Bloggers create a large two sided A-Frame truck mounted billboard — with the Operation Yellow Elephant graphic?
Just like the Kiss float is newsworthy, this reminds everyone that LieberBaby is hiring out of state College Republicans to do his dirty work!!!
Maybe the CostCo poster printing service could do it — break the graphic up into four (or more) panels, and assemble them on the billboard.
Hope’s Youtube - That’s what our family is doing on a river in Utah in one week. Well, we’ll be in a raft but there are 15 of us going - 2 rafts and 8 kayaks. Last time I went on a multi-day trip with these folks, Waco unfolded while we were headed down river.
Wonder what I’ll find When we re-emerge this time?
Ned Lieberman is the Dem nominee in CT
Boltin’ Joe has bolded Indy
HopeSAT smiling to us from Germany
Peace in the Middle East
Yeah, Margot! It flew through the tubes to everyone I know. Very powerful and on point.
Hey M,
I am so envious on two counts:
You’ve put young Grant to bed
You get to go work with Jane and Lamont and everyone in CN.
{{{{M}}}}
Darkblack, if you’re out there, I need you!
df530 at bellsouth dot net
Thanks!!
Look, the important point is that the Republicans are campaigning for Joe. Stick to this, do not get sidetracked.
Wilbur at 5:56, I agree. You wrote: Watch them tremble if they are forced to face reality for even a moment.
As I am sure you know, there isn’t the “oxygen” to even begin having that kind of a reasoned discussion. With less than six days before the primary in a sound-byte world dominated by an adversarial media, I think Swan made absolutely the right call. I really hope darkblack is reading what you wrote, because I think s/he felt so devastated by Lieberman twisted it into a reaction which was so opposite of the artists’ intent.
. . . and your little dog, too –
Hey, I like Cheeto’s too — or at least, Kroger Baked Cheese Curls. Much better than the original, actually . . .
I love how the Huff posters complained about the racism of the picture, yet it was usually accompanied by something along the lines of “but what can you expect from hateful liberals, anyway.” Right.
It was in questionable taste, but not worthy of this kerflaffle. The Lieberman campaign is simply grabbing whatever they can.
Any word from the Connecticut African-American community on it? Or from Maxine Waters, or Al Sharpton?
Well, a picture says a thousand words, but I don’t think the inference made is what you were looking for. That said, what’s done is done. I understand FDL is home base, but the image incident didn’t occur here. And reading the HuffPo piece, it’s hard seeing how the image was relevant. With this FDL post, it’s easier to see the proper context. It’s painfully obvious the majority of America doesn’t keep up to tabs on things politcal and the quick sound bite is what gets attention. Keep things in context and move on.
A hundred points to the first person who can email me a photoshop of Malkin in blackface.
I prolly won’t get to use it, but god, I want it.
Hi Jane and darkblack -
Thanks to you both for your passion and drive.
As we all know, the Drudge/Malkin/O’Reilly spewholes don’t care about anything other than their pimpled backsides.
The idea that any of these creeps gives a flying jump about equality is risible as their record of overt and covert profession of racial stereotypes for monetary and political gain is despicable.
I’ve seen the commitment to freedom and equality for all reflected in both of your work, and I’m not concerned either of you intended any disrespect to anyone other than Joe and his apologists -