
Some people in America have to work three jobs just to put food on the table and pay the bills...but, thanks to the Republican Leadership in the House of Representatives, Paris Hilton's trust fund return just went up another $91 million (at 2 AM ET).
The Par-Tay Party is in the House! Go gop-ers, go gop-ers, who's your girlfriend, who's your girlfriend...
Here are some real family values: Americans who live on minimum wage have not had an increase in that pay for ten years -- a decade at the same pay rate -- while expenditures, especially costs on energy prices, have gone up, up, up. They are squeezing their budget every way you can think, just to survive, to feed their kids, to give them a decent home. And they are working their butts off -- two and three jobs for each parent, leaving the kids hanging out quite a bit with grandma and grandpa, who get to enjoy their golden years by being permanent babysitters (who can't afford both their prescription meds and food...but hey, who is counting...).
This year, the Republican-controlled Congress gave itself a pay raise -- and passed a series of other tax breaks for the GOP's lobbyist pals:
But there was GOP discontent, too. Some conservative in the House were unhappy about the minimum wage vote, while moderates in the party were restive about its being tied to cuts in the estate tax.The GOP package would increase the wage from $5.15 to $7.25 per hour, phased in over the next three years.
It would also exempt $5 million of an individual's estate, and $10 million of a couple's, from estate taxes by 2015. Estates worth up to $25 million would be taxed at capital gains rates, currently 15 percent and scheduled to rise to 20 percent. Tax rates on the remainder of larger estates would fall to 30 percent by 2015.
The maneuver was aimed at defusing the wage hike as a campaign issue for Democrats while using the popularity of the increase to achieve the Republican Party's longtime goal of permanently cutting estate taxes.
Besides the 10-year, $268 billion cut to the estate tax, the measure contains $38 billion in other tax cuts that enjoy widespread backing, such as the research-and-development tax credit.
Oh yeah, I got yer family values right here. It's called "we don't give a crap about you once you are out of the womb. It's every man for himself, and I'm getting mine." More on the GOP's Paris Hilton Poison Pill Estate Tax Maneuver from the LATimes and Forbes.
Classy.
You want to know what I think? Screw the estate tax. The GOP wants to play games, be fiscally irresponsible at the time when we are spending money like it is water in Iraq and in pork-filled earmarks? Fine. Screw them, and help the folks on minimum wage. And then, whent he Dems take back the House and the Senate, the Paris Hilton Gift Wrapped Par-tay Fund goes back to a sensible, reasonable level.
Handing off more money to people who already have more income in a week than most of the working poor see in a whole year? Smarmy. And if you don't believe me, listen to Oprah Winfrey. (Yes, THAT Oprah Winfrey. Sure, she has some fundage now, but as a kid, she was more than familiar with the ramen noodle diet that I lived in college -- and once you've been there, you should never, ever forget it.) Oprah did a show yeterday about living on minimum wage -- and it was powerful stuff:
Thirty million Americans who work full time are living in poverty. The federal minimum wage in the United States is $5.15 an hour and has not been raised in almost 10 years.Someone working full time at minimum wage earns $10,712 a year—that's $8,000 less than what the government defines as poverty.
Why should you care? These are the very people we rely on every day. They are the teachers' aides in your child's classroom. They are caring for your aging parents in the nursing home. They make sure your hotel rooms, your offices and your schools are clean. They are security guards keeping buildings safe. They are paramedics who are there in your most desperate hour.
Take a look at the whole page of clips and discussion points on Oprah's website, and tell me that this is not an issue that touches the heart of who we want to be in America. Single women, especially, are dealing with such a difficult series of choices with this -- especially single moms who have to deal with exes who fail to pay regular child support. It is a tough, tough place to be in life, and the fact that the GOP would tie in helping these folks (after giving themselves raises!) to a "more bling for Paris" poison pill is unconscionable.
This Republican maneuver disgusts me, but I can't say that I am surprised, not in the least. Because they don't really want to help out hard-working, decent Americans who don't have the money to contribute to their campaign coffers. And the effect that this has on these people's children? The GOP doesn't care, so long as it doesn't make their "No Child Left Behind" test scores look bad -- and when schools in poorer neighborhoods do badly, whose fault is it? Not the GOP. They are never, ever accountable for anything they do, are they?
So I say, let them have their lame-ass tax cut. Give a hand up to people who truly need it, and if Paris Hilton gets more bling out of it, then fine and dandy with me. Because it isn't about Paris Hilton -- it's about all those families living on the edge and barely scraping by day by day.
Perhaps it isn't the most politically savvy thing to do -- but you know, I see people every single day where I live having to make choices on their medication or their family eating, on their kids getting one new outfit for school or buying gas for the car to get back and forth to work. And I get the feeling that the GOP doesn't have a clue that people have to do that sort of thing to just live these days. (Hint: try spending time in the poorer part of your districts instead of just at fundraisers at the homes of wealthy donors. You'll get a whole new perspective.)
And if the Republicans in charge of Congress can not feel any shame at what they are doing -- at a time when they have run up the biggest deficits in the history of this nation (oh yeah, I got yer fiscal responsibility here -- I don't want to hear the word "conservative" in describing these yahoos ever again), at a time when the "working poor" are more and more numerous, at a time when they preach "family values" out of one side of their mouths but could honestly give a crap at how those families survive once a child is out of the womb because it is an "every man for himself" kinda world that they live in, then the hell with them.
I'd say for shame GOP, if I thought there was any shame left in them. But I'll have to settle for "stand up for the little guy" -- because the GOP sure as hell doesn't give a damn about them.
(For more on the Par-tay Bling Tax Repeal, take a peek at this guest post from Ian.)
UPDATE: Here are a few Democratic highlights from the late night Estate Tax Poison Pill debate:
-- Barney Frank was on fire.
-- Steny Hoyer stepped up to the plate. (Been a while since I said that!)
-- Nancy Pelosi laid things out very plainly -- and her disgust at the GOP tactics was palpable. Was on a conference call with her yesterday, and I can say in all honesty that she is pissed on behalf of all those Americans out there who are barely getting by...she gets it, what's wrong with the GOP?
If you all have seen other good examples on the debate, or good reporting, please link it up in the comments!
(Oh, and just for fun, Crooks and Liars has an hilarious Letterman clip.)
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Fitz!
We need more like Fitz
Evidently, Democrats do a different kind of bondage than Reps.
The Dem constintuency is bonded to their creditors, their job(s), and the bill collector.
Reps do zero coupon bonds, muni bonds, and they DREAM of the bondage in Christy’s provocative photo (you do that a lot, CHS! Not that it’s bad thing!)
Take Back Our Country!
If I was working three jobs at minimum wage, and I saw the Democrats wouldn’t vote for it becuase of the estate tax issue, it wouldn’t make me feel like voting for them, no matter how much they promised.
When they had a chance to take action they didn’t.
I was under the impression that the DOJ requires that any pictures like this (i.e. bondage, nude or not, no matter how obviously the model is over 18) needs to comply with USC 18, sec 2257.
Protecting ths kids, you know?
& wow! they’re phasing in the minimum wage hike — wouldn’t want to shock the system . . .
despize the beyotch …
and when i start despizin’
i know it’s Really Time to Sleep …
Seriously, what is it that makes president cheney want to bankrupt us, kill us all, kill the earth, destroy all future of all living beings?
What is is that makes all tv screens cheerlead this?
Damn these soulless nazi fucks - i have such dread - they have barely begun their awfulness upon this land unless we stop them
sorry just thought I’d cheer everybody up - off to Cute Overload :)
Idon’t mean to hijack this thread, but I have to leave to go to a kickoff rally for Dave Mejias (running against Peter King) and I want to get this out to you all, but don’t have time to wait for the proper thread.
Russel Tice got subpeonaed to testify to a GJ seated in a VERY pro-WH district. They have cherry picked the venue (I wonder what the jurisdictional predicate was? Hmmm?)and are looking to put the fear of God or at least fear of Gonzales into the rank and file.
I clicked through to www.nswbc.org and it was quite a revelation. I don’t usually blog pimp, but i’m making an exception here.
Rock on, Christy. The Dems should have voted for it. Then, when we take congress, repeal the tax-cuts for the rich. Every American should pay his or her Fair Share.
Gee, I’m pleased as punch that in my own small way I’ve helped push the word “Goper” further into the public lexicon.
One thing that drew me to the campaign of Howard Dean was his insistance that just one person can make a difference. But it has to come from the heart.
Red Line Blues
Found this post over at kos documenting the actual dollar breakdown the big gift to Paris Hilton:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/7/29/5511/59225
Christy you cannot forget what the super-rich get another gift from the Repugs, the problem is that this will reduce revenues to the US Treasury which will increase the debt which then will pass this debt payment to the poor and middle class.
It is the reverse Robbin Hood policies of this Republican Congress to give to the super-uber-rich which will require taking from the poor. It also will put Democrats in a tricky position when they do retake congress. What is the Repug line….. “Dems will raise your taxes” … Well they are making sure that happens, no matter what!
katymine 12
You point another problem the Democrats have, they let the Republicans control the message. If th Democrats get out in front, and are agressive in supporting their actions, they can make the Republicans defend their tax breaks for the wealthy,
They really should counter with saying fine - we’lll just make death transfers an incometaxable event and lose free step up.
No “already taxed” issue, bc only prior untaxed gain is being taxed. Work that in with a credible approach to tax avoidance minority discounts in family llps or llcs, and go on. Someday that advice will be worth 2 cents I guess.
i saw the oprah show when it originally aired and was shocked by how many of the working poor they looked at were working in health-care related fields. considering that health-care costs have been out of control for years i don’t understand where all that money is going since it doesn’t seem to be supporting any of the regular folks working in the industry.
To be fair, Paris Hilton’s parents are true blue Dems and I heard they give lots of money to Dems. They are not in the forefront of this estate tax repeal. Apparently, there are 13 super rich families that are heavyily lobbying for this repeal. And Walmart heirs are the most prominent among them. “Paris Hilton tax cut” is a catchy slogan, but it should be called “walmart heirs tax cut”. Sam Walton might have been a southern/new deal dem, but his sons/daughters have become true red right wingers in every sense of the phrase.
Makes me very angry that the GOP cannot bring itself to do ANYTHING for those at the bottom of the pay scale without handing their super-rich constituents another gift.
Ought to be called the “Let Them Eat Cake” bill.
I can’t agree with going ahead with the minimum wage hike in exchange for the Hilton Tax giveaway. It just costs too much to the treasury. But then I am comfortable (so far) and would like to hear a more thorough discussion.
The idea of folks having to wait two more years for a shot at a higher minimum wage is ugly. And thinking of the ads that will be run against Dems in swing districts “He voted against raising the minimum wage. How can he say he is for the little guy?
But then, isn’t the contest going to be against GOPs in swing districts, so there is no DEM officeholder that is forced to vote on this?
I can’t see the GOPs campaigning that they voted to raise the minimum wage. It alienates their base.
This is of course all political cynical–not what Christy is talking about–the reality of living on $5.15 an hour.
But catch this added piece of bullshit in the last sentence, about tips counting toward the wage:
“Under the minimum wage proposal, the current $5.15 rate would rise by $2.10 over three years in three increments, reaching $5.85 in January 2007, $6.55 on June 1, 2008, and $7.25 on June 1, 2009. The change would also allow tips to be counted toward minimum wage increases in states where that is not now allowed.”*
*from NYT story.
Sorry–ecoast, but it’s the Paris Hilton tax cut or giveaway. The WalMart heir thing is just not as catchy.
“Seriously, what is it that makes president cheney want to bankrupt us”
aren’t poor people ripe pickings for military recrutiment? the only way to avoid a draft is to keep creating a growing class of people desperate enough for a buck that they would sign up.
It’s disgusting. The sanctimonious “Christian” Republicans will each have a lot of ’splainin’ to do when they get to the Pearly Gates. “Woe to you that are rich, for you have received your consolation.”
A special exception should be made, though, for Warren Buffett, who has spoken out against the estate tax repeal and is giving most of it away.
I understand your frustration, Christy, but voting for more plutocrat tax cuts and thinking that can easily be reversed if the Democrats retake Congress ignores the fact that any attempt to repeal tax cuts will surely be vetoed. We would therefore have to retake both the House and the Senate by veto-proof margins, and there aren’t enough Senate seats up this fall for that to happen. On the other hand, killing this now and passing a stand alone minimum wage bill after the elections (assuming we would have the votes for that) means Bush would have to veto that. That’s not such an easy call for him to make. In the meantime, Democrats can run on that issue and on fiscal responsibility, which they cannot do if they pass this bill. So much though I hate to disagree with you, I think Nancy Pelosi was right on this one.
$91 million would pay for the difference between the $5.15 minimum wage and the $7.25 minimum wage for almost 21,000 people for a year (at full-time). $268 billion over 10 years would make up that difference for more than 6.1 million people (also over 10 years).
$26.8 billion [annualized] / ($2.10 [min. wage diff.] * 40 [hrs/week] * 52 [wks/yr]) = 6,135,531 people
The same amount would pay for 1.78 million full-time employees at the $7.25 minimum wage rate.
Maybe the Dems’ message should be that the GOP has to bundle the wage-hike with estate tax “relief” because they fear the fall-out their “No” votes would bring if there were a stand-alone minimum wage bill.
Dems need to make clear that they welcome the opportunity to vote for a minimum wage increase, and have no qualms about voting against estate tax relief.
Millineryman #13 -
I agree that is Issue #1 for Dems.
There needs to be put out there is Corporations paying their fair share of taxes. They use the infrastructure built and paid for my OUR tax dollars, roads, railroads, ports and the internet. If you do business, live and work in America, then you pay your fair share.
Did you know that the 4 years prior to John Snow becoming Secratary of the Treasury, the company he was CEO did not pay taxes and received 160 million dollars in rebates? It also is the company CRX that was sold to B&O which is now owned by the Dubai Ports.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/2/22/101323/855
(scroll down to the section “Additional reserch by katymine”.
This is what I told the reporter from the Chicago Tribune at Yearlykos “off the record”. Why is it a regular old person can find all that detail about John Snow that was put in as a comment and then front paged on kos. I just love the internet!
As much as I hate to say it, can’t blame this one entirely on the GOP. It would have been defeated had we not had 34 turncoats.
Roll Call - Dems voting Yes:
Abercrombie
Barrow
Bean
Berkley
Berry
Boren
Boswell
Boucher
Boyd
Brown (OH)
Case
Chandler
Cramer
Cuellar
Davis (TN)
Edwards
Ford
Gordon
Herseth
Jefferson
Marshall
Matheson
McIntyre
Melancon
Mollohan
Moore (KS)
Peterson (MN)
Rahall
Ross
Rush
Strickland
Tanner
Towns
Wu
Having said that, how likely is it that the Senate is gonna go along with this? Pelosi says it’s dead.
I think a smart Dem. could vote for this bill and slam the GOP over the head with it from now until 2008 or whenever it gets repealed. It shows the greed that is the “G” in GOP.
“Goper”
Let it become a term of derision. Let it be a hiss and by word in the street. Look upon the Goper as you look upon someone blowing smoke in the face of a newborn.
“Goper”
It’s an ‘us v. them’ word that clearly identifies the object of derision. It exposes its dark side with a Mel Brooks snicker. It’s the mocking laughter at the Brownshirts in the beer hall.
“Goper”
Its a word to be used the way they used the word ‘Liberal.’ It rolls lightly off the tongue and stings like spit in the face of a fascist.
“Goper”
It’s the one word they have no defense against.
It’s a word that deserves a cherished ubiquity. An ultimate term of scorn.
Okay, so make it the “G” in Goper. That’s works for me.
And I get the feeling that the GOP doesn’t have a clue that people have to do that sort of thing to just live these days.
No, they don’t. At times like these, I’m always reminded of the Texas lawmaker I read about a few years back, who when the legislature was debating a cut to some program for the poor, responded to opponents by saying “well, they’ll just have a little less to leave to their children.”
Some of them are wilfully evil, others are just wilfully ignorant. But I’m reminded of the judge’s instructions in the Enron case, that the defendents could be found guilty even if they did not know about the fraud if the facts showed they should have known and were willfully ignorant of it. That standard applies to governing, too.
I’m a-trying and a-trying, but right now I can’t think of a single country not being ruled by the biggest doofus or set of doofi that that particular population currently has to offer.
The latest proof:
Care to step into my small room for a short talk and an elastic loaf, anyone?
katymine 25
Thanks for the background on John Snow. I did not know that.
I’m always amazed at how the internet really hit it’s stride parallel to the Bush Incorp regime. And by using it’s power, we can help shape the message that the traditional media ignores.
Hehe lotus…
Before you start calling Iran crazy, France agressively goes after non-french words too. (Yes, I know, Iran is way crazier than France hehe). And our own goopers want to worship English as the divine language and ban dem furreign words.
curious jim #21:
At least one militant Christian has some ’splainin’ to do right now. Allegedly.
http://www.tmz.com/2006/07/28/.....-cover-up/
I wonder if he’s ever thought about the ethnicity of his most famous character.
Call or Fax your Senators, to jointly walk out of the Senate and demand a Press conference, and say they want to let the American public know that the Republicans are blackmailing them into approving more Wealth for the Wealthy on the backs of Minimum Wage Earners!!!
Russia had a anti-foreign word purge in the Czar period. Pushkin made fun of one of the censors in one of his writings.
Christy:
Industry laywers have said that any depiction of bondage falls under the “sadistic or masochistic abuse” definitions in 2256. Publishing a regulated image makes one a “secondary producer” according to DOJ’s interpretation.
Ridiculous. & serious — check out those criminal penalties.
I dunno Christy, I kind of favor nixing this gooper bill that phases in minimum wage increases over 3 years. And just passing better bill after November, when the Dems control the Legislature. A bill that will not have the greedy give away to the Caviar Class.
I lived on minimum during and immediately after college, and at one point I couldn’t even renew my driver’s license because I needed a new glasses prescription and couldn’t afford it. I’m fortunate in that I had a degree and eventually got much better jobs, but I’ll never forget living like that. This kind of things happens to the poorest people all the time…and it’s extremely short-sighted of the wealthy to allow it.
At some point the poorest will just become fed up and start using force…and is that really what we want?
Kurt - France agressively goes after non-french words too.
The stuffy Academie Francaise is fighting a losing battle against the evolution of language, trying to keep it “pure”.
Millineryman 32
Anyone know that DP World owns 22 ports?
Does anyone know that the deal went through and NO ONE did anything to stop it?
I remember the Japan scare of the 80’s, Japan was buying up everything, “they will own all of America” but in actuality it was a front to cover up all the other countries who were doing the big buys to divert attention. Cities and states across the country have been selling their infrastructure to foreign companies & countries which will be charing fees and tolls. The day will come where only the rich will able to travel across America. For those of us who live in the west, tolls and fees are foreign concept. We have “Freeways” for a reason.
Portland Oregon is considering selling three of their bridges, areas in Texas are selling roads to foreign countries, roads in California are built by a foreign company and Texas is pushing for their part of the superhighway.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200.....s_for_sale
Um, paramedics make minimum wage? I am highly skeptical of that claim, Ms. Winfrey.
Great post, though.
Mel Gibson DUI arrest.
You’ll notice that I’m veering away from this topic. That’s because it makes me so mad I’d just splutter if I tried to address it.
Therefore:
Here (since it’s midday Saturday, and you know what that means) is one of Sunday NYT’s most fascinating and, for us, potentially-goodest-news articles.
For those who were following the ImpeachPac kerfluffle yesterday, they’ve released a replacement video for that “neo-nazi’s in the military one”.
Click to see it
Dems should turn it down flat.
If I read correctly, Hilton’s trust fund immediately gains $91 million dollars. Immediately. Yet, the minimum wage “grows” to $7.25 from $5.15 over three years. In three years time that $7.25 will be the equivalent of $5.15 today. This is a crumb off the table that should be tossed back in their faces.
And no, this is not a slam against Hilton personally (she’s hot!) but her case is a perfect example of the screwed up priroties we have with the GOP “leading” things.
The dems need to use this to drive home the point: is this the kind of nation we want to become? For all their talk of “values,” “morals” and religiosity, doing this is the antithesis to all of that. The WWJD crowd could not say that Jesus would approver of doing something like this.
People with wealth like that of the Hiltons already have more money than they can spend in ten lifetimes, it makes no sense to be lavishing millions more on them, when you got millions of people working 2 and 3 jobs and still in poverty.
Sorry, Christy, but going along right now with estate tax extension is a major, bad idea that would be a BIG mistake. As it now stands, the estate tax moratorium goes away next year, without the Democrats doing anything except standing firm with filibuster and other framing techniques.
If the Dems were so stupid as to allow the estate tax repeal to become permanent, they will not get it back until they can override a GOP filibuster — regardless of how dire the fiscal situation becomes.
Should the Dems take one house of Congress this yearr, they will actually get some space in the newspapers (not the single paragraph they get now — para 17 of 19) and can frame the issue and push it again and again into the limelight. And they can do it without the poison pills.
The good news is that Boehner seriously angered Grassley and Enzi by stabbing them in the back and yanking pieces of legislation from their bills and putting into something that shouldn’t pass if the Dems have an ounce of sense and a backbone stronger than Joe Biden’s. BTW, let’s get Joe Lieberman’s on the record on where he stands on a Paris Hilton bill filibuster.
Also worth pushing, pushing, pushing, is that this bill wasn’t written up and distributed when they voted on it. Runaway GOP congress. This was in every Dem speech opposing the bill, but mysteriously disappeared in the Post’s writeup. This is corruption that hits in every district, not just the ones where there are pictures of money changing hands.
Great catch punaise on Mel.
OMIGOD!
In AdNag’s Sunday story on Short Ride, we read:
{*} but not yet online
Nice catch WaPo critic.
msgop live poll . . . about . . . wait for it!!
the I word!!!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904
hmmmmm?
lotus, kurt,
Crusades to purify the language of “foreign” elements are futile and an admission that the war to “save” the language from foreign intrusions has already been lost. Farsi has you point out has a heavy superstrate of Arabic. Yet it hasn’t destroyed the Persian language so that anyone would notice. France too can legislate and make attempts to replace anglicisms. Some will succeed but in the meantime dozens of new anglicisms enter for each of these “victories”. These efforts are political and represent just one tension among many others that determine how a language will develop and how extensively it will borrow from other languages.
A more troubling aspect of “language management” is the suppression and discouragement of regional languages. Kurdish was essentially banned in Turkey for decades and while things have loosened up it and its speakers are still discriminated against. It is my understanding that in Iran regional languages are forbidden in schools and that if a child needs to use the bathroom they must ask in Farsi. Tehran says this is to encourage students to learn the national language. Speakers of Arabic, Azeri, Armenian, Baluchi, Kurdish, and Turkoman tend to see it more as Farsi hegemonism and discrimination.
PER LOTUS
New York Times endorses
NED LAMONT
shorter GOP:
finders, keepers
losers, freepers
As the mother of three young adults (23-26yrs)who are still living at home, two are in college. They attempted to make it on their own after they progressed beyond the min wage jobs to the next level jobs at Home Depot, Guess? and Starbucks making around $12/hr. The youngest was doing “ok” paycheck to paycheck but it was the increasing cost of gas that pushed him over the edge.
I worry about their future, not just being drafted and sent to a war I oppose but how are they going to afford a house? One daughter graduated from ASU last December and still looking for her post degree job out of her collge job in retail.
Somehow I thought one of the basic values in America was to make sure that our children had opportunities, things better than what we had. I continue to feel bad that I could not give the “leave it to beaver” life that I had to my children, the low cost California higher education, the ability to leave home and make it with just a little help from Mom & Dad.
In the nearly 10 years since the minimum [wage] was raised, Congress has voted itself nine pay hikes totaling nearly $35,000 a year
http://blog.aflcio.org/?p=871
Over in the Senate, Bill Frist has beem working on a similar ploy:
So not only are they holding minimum wage earners hostage, throw in teachers who buy their own supplies. GOP is evil.
New York Times tells Bubbah and all the Vichy Dems to go Dick Cheney themselves!
Sorry about all that AdNag vamping, but I wanted you guys to share the surprise just as I had.
good for NYT. Go Ned.
via TPM:
What clash of divergent worlds, people struggling while working 3 jobs, wealthy people with no need for more money, and the people who are in power playing their poltical chess games.
The biggest losers of course are the people struggling.
oops, somebody’s taggy negligence has reduced the impact of my bold, which was intended…
Several states have already pegged their min wage to inflation. If they do pass this incremental increase, by the time it is in effect three years out it will still be a net loss for the worker.
NYT for Lamont - that is big!!!!
woohoo!
Congressman John Conyers posted his opinion about this latest Republican political maneuver: House Republicans At Their Most Cynical
Arcturus at 37 — I seriously doubt a publicity photo of Paris Hilton that she put out to promote her “album” counts as sadistic bondage.
Kurt - thanks for the ad update …. phew!
while I agree with the argument in both ads, the production values sure need work
and thank goodness they pulled the Lamont mention!
ppirt at 9:54:
MSNBC online impeachment poll running 87% for “there is plenty to justify putting him on trial” with 275,000 responses!
We need a fresh revolution in this country - a total, balls/tits-out, nothing-to-lose, storm-the-bastille revolution - the cheney/kenny boy monster mentality will not be happy or sated short of total enslavement/starvation of the lesser folk - and even then not happy or sated - congress is their evil toady, I look forward to seeing them on the guillotine also
let me rephrase comment #52 (the one with the bad unclosed tag!)
NYTimes endorses Ned Lamont !
CHS at 10:07: Not against her, maybe but what about us? *g*
ppirt #50: That MSNBC poll is rockin!
87% say impeach the SOB!
Mary says: “They really should counter with saying fine - we’lll just make death transfers an incometaxable event and lose free step up.”
July 29th, 2006 at 9:01 am
You’re referring to the stepup in basis of inherited property permitted under Internal Revenue Code Section 1014. One of the problems with repealing that section of the Internal Revenue Code is the difficulty of determining the cost basis of property that has been in a family for many generations.
How much revenue is generated by federal gift and estate tax? I haven’t read the answer to that question in a long time, but I do recall that the amount of revenue generated by gift and estate taxes has historically been a very small percentage of taxes collected.
ppirt and everhopeful, almost 280,000 have responded to the MSNBC poll when I checked. 87% say “yes.”
These GOP thugs are out of control. I understand that this Estate Tax cut will affect a possible 7500 families? Did these rich families actually ask for this? If I had that kind of money, it would be a privilege to pay that tax! I guess that’s why I’m a Democrat though!
Now I have font envy.
Here’s a site (Let Justice Roll) dedicated to a Living Wage Campaign. They have had sucess in Pennsyvania and North Carolina. In progress is MA and CA.
Also, this map shows states with higher/lower minimum wage than the Fed’s.
Christy @ 65: One would think so, I agree. I’m was just trying to bring some attention to a very overly broad law, & the way it is being interpereted by the DOJ. You’ll find that here is a lot of ‘normal’ commercial stuff that can fall within its purview, if you take the time to check out the issue.
What I’d really like to see is an end to corporations being tax-exempt by hiding their “headquarters” offshore, while all of their business is being conducted right here. I don’t know how much extra revenue that would bring in, but I’m sure it would be a non-trivial amount hehe.
Really, at this point they’re just blatantly saying it, there is no “society” any more, there is them with a big fat gun and this is a ‘jackin over and over, and your children? Sneering cackle, what a shame their name isn’t Frist or Bush.
Maybe Peanut will grow up to take back this nation.
DemfromCt has a frontpaged diary at dkos on the Lieberman-Lamont race. Not much new (to us) in the diary itself, but some interesting stuff in the comments, particularly about the impeachpac ad that has apparently been pulled. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/7/29/10164/7867
ilson 68 - holy crap!
now if we could only get them to unendorse so much else since 01
Sharkie, back up to 47 ^ .
Sorry *ilson.
OT I would appreciate any suggestion on who to thank at the New York Times.
Also, unless someone dissuades me, I’m seriously considering informing Fred Hiatt at the WaPo.
Christy: According to the DOJ, any depiction of bondage falls under the “sadistic activity” clause.
“Now I have font envy.”
707
Most of the cost analyses I have seen are for complete repeal rather than the partial rollback passed by the House and likely to languish in the Senate. You can take issue with the exact costs but they almost certainly would be substantial.
“Permanent repeal of the estate tax would cost nearly $1 trillion between 2012 and 2021, the first ten year period in which its costs would be fully felt. (This cost includes $776 billion in revenue loss and $213 billion in higher interest payments on the federal debt.)”
http://www.cbpp.org/5-31-06tax.htm
also
http://www.cbpp.org/4-3-01tax.htm
As of 1:20 pm EDT, MSNBC Live Poll:
Do you believe President Bush’s actions justify impeachment? * 277486 responses
Yes, between the secret spying, the deceptions leading to war and more, there is plenty to justify putting him on trial. — 87%
No, like any president, he has made a few missteps, but nothing approaching “high crimes and misdemeanors.” — 4.3%
No, the man has done absolutely nothing wrong. Impeachment would just be a political lynching.
– 7.1%
I don’t know. — 1.8%
====
Now we know where the real basement is located: at 13%, plus or minus MOE.
Screw you, 13%, we are not going to be held hostage by this fakery much longer; you are definitely not the majority in this country.
Now we know where the real basement is located: at 13%, plus or minus MOE.
Well, among MSNBC.com users who happened to be using at that time . . .
NOT that there’s anything wrong with that! *g*
lotus 74
Now I have font envy.
well, the pen is mightier than the sword
punaise — D’oh!
Language ‘Purists’ in NJ:
Great catch Rayne!
MSNBC Poll
Do you believe President Bush’s actions justify impeachment?
Yes, between the secret spying, the deceptions leading to war and more, there is plenty to justify putting him on trial.
87%
No, like any president, he has made a few missteps, but nothing approaching “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
4.3%
No, the man has done absolutely nothing wrong. Impeachment would just be a political lynching.
7.1%
I don’t know.
1.8%
* 277594 responses
Tell that to a guy named Bobbit punaise.
And I would imagine that when news of Bush’s new bill allowing them to arrest any American citizen and jail them indefinitely without trial gets out, the basement might drop a little lower!
us Anglo-Saxons should have had a Language Purity Institute after 1166 — what a mongrelized tongue we speak now ! Carramba!
Mary - any guy cringes at the mention of that name….!
Conviction Upheld for WorldCom’s Ebbers
From Bloomberg News
July 29, 2006
“A federal appeals court upheld the securities fraud conviction of former WorldCom Inc. Chief Executive Bernard Ebbers, who will probably begin serving a 25-year prison term for leading an $11-billion fraud…..”
Ilson, I’m in the love Proto-Indo-European or die camp!
(not really hehe)
this would be a good time to recall Hugh’s brilliant series on the foreign influences on American language
Hedwig cringes too !
1166?
1166 - it’s the new 1066.