
David H. Brooks, former chief executive of the company named after himself DHB Industries Inc., is a greedy war profiteer that sounds like the long lost love child of Enron's Kenneth Lay and Martha Stewart.
Brooks developed DHB in 1992 after he purchased the fledgling company "from the verge of bankruptcy." Earlier that year, the Securities and Exchange Commission penalized him while working at a brokerage firm with his brother. A hefty $405,000 fine by the SEC and an $800,000 investment later, Brooks was back in business. (DHB has two divisions, DHB Armor Group and DHB Sports Group, the latter produces protective gear for athletes.)
In 1998, DHB received a contract to be the lone supplier for armored vests for the U.S. armed forces. It was supplemented when the U.S. went to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. In 2001, sales were at $98 million.
Sarah Anderson, from the Institute for Policy Studies, writes:
His fortunes turned dramatically in the lead-up to the Iraq war, when Brooks successfully lobbied for an exclusive contract to make the vests used in the body armor now issued to every U.S. soldier in Iraq. The Pentagon’s largesse boosted DHB’s stock, which in turn sent Brooks’ pay, including stock options, skyrocketing, from $525,000 in 2001 to $70 million dollars in 2004.
Charlie Cray, of the Center for Corporate Policy, wrote that Brooks' compensation raise constituted a 13,349% pay increase. Meanwhile, the federal minimum wage continues frozen at $5.15 for the last decade and corporate payouts to executives are on the rise, further spreading the pay-gap between top execs and their employees.
Timothy O'Brien wrote for the New York Times in January 2006 that DHB claimed over $340 million in sales last year. And while the exclusive contract slowed the deployment of the body armor until nine months after the war started, over 23,000 DHB vests were recalled because they failed to pass tests to stop a 9mm round.
The Marines and the Army recalled about 23,000 Point Blank vests from the field last year after The Marine Corps Times reported that the Marines acquired the vests despite warnings from Army personnel that the vests had what the newspaper described as "critical, life-threatening flaws."
Michael Moss of the New York Times wrote that a Pentagon study concluded that roughly 80 percent of the upper-body wounds to U.S. Marines in Iraq that resulted in death could have been prevented if the soldiers had more body armor. O'Brien wrote that DHB Industries said it was the Department of Defense that outlined the armor specifications and not the manufacturer. Producing bad products was the least of Brooks' worries, wrote Anderson, "Instead, the Defense Department is focusing on alleged financial wrongdoing at DHB – a matter further from their own hands."
And so like Al Capone and his tax evasion and Augusto Pinochet and his money laundering, David H. Brooks’ downfall will likely have more to do with financial hanky-panky than the possibility that troops were killed because of his company’s shoddy vests.
In late 2004, the Brooks family sold millions (reportedly $186 million, according to O'Brien) in stock at the end of 2004 just prior to serious concerns arose regarding the faulty body armor. His holdings in the company decreased by over two-thirds from 48 to 15 percent. The sale dropped the stock price from $22 to $6.50 per share.
Last November, in what sounds like an episode of MTV's "My Sweet Sixteen" gone mad, Brooks reportedly spent $10 million on the Bat Mitzvah party for his daughter held atop of the Rockefeller Center in New York. (A few pictures can be found here.)
Earlier this month, Brooks was placed on administrative leave by the DHB Board of Directors, until his "legal problems are over."
Brooks is currently under federal, state and internal investigations regarding his stock-based compensation. Brooks cashed out nearly $70 million in DHB stock in fiscal 2004. DHB is also under Securities and Exchange Commission investigation regarding alleged fraud in its inventory records. According to Monday's statement, Brooks will have no authority at DHB. Retired General Larry Ellis, DHB's president, will assume the role of acting chief executive.
And a quick update on the stock:
DHB's stock, which last traded on the AMEX at $1.57 per share, opened on the pinks July 7 at 87 cents per share and has since crept higher. Shares of DHB gained 8 cents, more than 8 percent, to trade at 98 cents per share Monday morning.
At this rate, Brooks' daughter will have to settle for a drive-in wedding ceremony in Las Vegas. Aerosmith and 50 Cent will be unable to attend, but Elvis has R.S.V.P.'d.
Other Posts in the Series
"Merchants of Misery" and the "Do-Less-Than-Nothing" Congress (introduction), 04.29.06
Houston, We Have a Problem (Halliburton), 05.06.06
Friends in High Places (Bechtel), 05.20.06
Transforming Risk into Opportunity (Custer Battles), 06.03.06
The Insider (General Dynamics), 06.25.06
A Day Late and a Dollar Short (Parsons), 07.01.06
Justice in a Sea of Destruction?, 07.08.06
To the U.S. "Thanks for the Money!" --Halliburton, 07.15.06
Your Tax Dollars at Work, 07.22.06
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Putz!
Ned!
Jane!
Redd!
Pach!
Donita!
Wish it had been that warmongering wanker
No wonder he prostitutes himself every time he appears as a pundit.
Ought O. Mattic for the People!
(OK, that’s the last time…)
I couldn’t figure out what to put as the picture but whenever I read Brooks’ name in DHB articles, I envisioned him to look like Bobo, so there you go.
Damn, Matt, you had me going until I saw klyde’s comment.
Damn, I thought it was Bobo. I almost started celebrating.
Ya don’t mean the young David whose eureka moment was fishing a burning $5 bill out of a barrel when his parents took him to a hippie be-in in NY’s Central Park? No, no, couldn’t be that little Davie.
Matt O
You gotta do more than put that tiny photo caption up there to make it clear that this is NOT The Wall Street Journal writer and PBS commentator.
Because it took me three attemtps at re-reading and switching back and forth to the Bat Miztvah link before I figured out that the post was NOT about the guy in the picture that went with the post.
If he wants to sue your ass, I would take that case, because this is not fair what you are doing to him.
See what I mean, Qualar at 4 thinks you are talking about teh WSJ Brooks
WHICH YOU ARE NOT.
This is wrong
See what I mean, Qualar at 4 thinks you are talking about teh WSJ Brooks
WHICH YOU ARE NOT.
This is wrong
Looks like Brooks got a twofer:
Insider trading and war profiteering all rolled up in one neat package.
not cool. and believe me, there’s nothing i like more than a little bobo bitch-slapping.
O. Matt….
I’m so horrified by these jackals! $50 MILLION on any child (unless for medical necessity) is just sick and evil.
Still, you deserve major kudos on bringing every dirty detail to light.
As my Dad might have put it: “DAMN THESE BASTARDS TO HELL AND BACK!”
—
(That is a HIGH compliment. Trust me.)
—-
I wish there was a way to label each and every atrocity with the time-honored slogan:
“Your Tax Dollars At Work” -
might wake some folks up.
—-
lhp -
left you somethng downstairs.
—–
I took a test in 5th grade. Brilliant teacher. It was a sheetful of questions that were kinda Zennish. They might have an answer, but you’d spend an hour calculating…AT THE TOP WAS :
“Read everything. Turn the page over, sign you name and hand it in.”
A lesson well taught.
Is Qualar the only one?
I think we would all know if the pundit/columnist David Brooks was a war profiteer by now.
Yup. I’m a sloppy reader sometimes and I definitely thought it was BoBo.
Alright, since the point isn’t effectively made and people are confusing the two, I’ll change the picture.
Matt 15 -
The problem is the most unlikely suspects are war profiteers these days — in upside down world anything is possible.
Jenny 18 –
Duly noted.
BlanK - I took a test in 5th grade. Brilliant teacher. It was a sheetful of questions that were kinda Zennish. They might have an answer, but you’d spend an hour calculating…AT THE TOP WAS :
“Read everything. Turn the page over, sign you name and hand it in.”
A lesson well taught.
I remember racing though a test like that, so satisfied that I was “acing” it. Only one student, a quiet thoughtful girl, actually “got it”.
“in upside down world anything is possible”…
–
Too true. Like Jozo berating Ned for holding a stock portfolio w/HAL, while he himelf also owns that same holding.
Replace this D.H. Brooks fellow with a retired general. Sounds like this stock might go back up. There ought to be some sense of shame in this fubar world.
I’m sorry Matt, I am not coming down on you, I think you have miscalulated badly here.
This is SOOO not FDL. We don’t do unfair. We play a little rough sometimes, but fair.
WSJ Brooks has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with this post and you have done nothing to protect him from a misunderstanding due to similar name and have exacerbated the problem by putting his picture there.
IMHO you need to swap a pix of the David Brooks you are talking about and ammend your post to MAKE IT VERY CLEAR that you are NOT talking about WSJ Brooks.
Please do this pronto. Please. I’m begging you. or take the post down. Please.
Matt O at 17.
Thank you so much
More importantly, that Bat Miztvah is nauseating. What’s she going to do for her Sweet Sixteen? Fly her friends to Mars?
Thanks, Matt!
Matt O. - you’re great - just protect yourself.
Jenny from the Blog 25 - lmao We can only hope it’s a one way ticket.
punaise -
My class mighta had a half doz out of 30ish.
Sadly, I was not one. But, I did gain a valuable lesson. I’m no lawyer, but I do tend to read EVERYTHING. Starting at the top.
—-
….finally, lhp - CONGRATS on your case. (even if Buckner’s shadow floats around. I’m certain the non-judgemental ‘action’ is positive.)
with mega apologies to Matt who I can’t wait to read …
just wanna say that I’ve booked a flight into CT tomorrow and will be working for Lamont thru the primary - had a minibonus from work and some unused vacation and can’t think of a better use than taking back our democracy … taking up Jane’s call to get to New Haven and add some boots to the ground.
I’ll see if I can get more info when I’m there to share with folks about the possibility of virtual phone banks, etc and whatever else Jane and crew think useful.
So c’mon down or east or up and join us!
Do we know which congress-critters and Senators are involved wtih these contracts? Who took bribes and killed Marines?
Steve
Graet news siun!
siun walks the walk and talks the talk!
Great too… preview is my snarky cousin
Way to go siun!
GNN cited that Brooks ran up $2 million on corporate credit cards.
Now THAT’S quite the credit line.
Matt, the company website has some good pictures. You could probably grab one of those. I did see your caption, and anyway I already knew it was a different David Brooks — but the first time I saw an article about the DHB David Brooks, I was thoroughly confused by the similarity of the names. Then I got it — one David Brooks is a sleazy, prevaricating douchebag, and the other founded a body armor company.
OT There is some reason for guarded optimism about the situation in Lebanon. The key event was the decision of the Israelis not to escalate the conflict further. Israel was looking at a protracted war psychologically draining and ruinous for its economy. Lebanon sustained major damage to its infrastructure, general disruption of its economy, and more civilian deaths. Large numbers of Israeli and Lebanese civilians have also been traumatized and displaced.
While the costs were high to both sides, both Hezbollah and the Israeli Defense Force have made their points. Hezbollah showed it can stand up to the Israelis. Israel showed that if it does Lebanon, the Shia, and Hezbollah will pay a catastrophic price.
Meanwhile the elements of a peace deal were there all along and may now look preferable to the alternative.
The Israeli points are:
1) A quiet Northern border
2) An international force in South Lebanon under UN auspices: The Israelis originally wanted an international force without the UN to take on and disarm Hezbollah. This was unnecessarily confrontational, would have been hard to put together, and would have looked like yet another foreign occupation, something which both the Shia and Hezbollah have been very sensitive to. So while it may not seem like a big difference, it is really quite important.
3) Agreement that Hezbollah should be disarmed. Realistically, this will take a while but even before the current crisis there was talk of incorporating Hezbollah forces into the Lebanese army. A ban on further importation of rockets is critical and would need the approval of Hezbollah, Syria, and the Lebanese government and be part of any UN mandate.
4) Return of the captured Israeli soldiers
For Hezbollah the points are:
1) A quiet Southern border
2) Return of Lebanese and Hezbollah prisoners held by Israel
3) Cessation of Israeli overflights, and assassinations
4) Return of the Shaba Farms
The US and Condoleezza Rice’s role in all this is mostly not to screw up a deal that is begging to be made. Similarly, what is needed for both Hezbollah and the Israelis is to keep the inevitable posturing to a minimum and do what is in both their best interests.
suin, scarecrow, cosmo and ReDeb!
Thank you so much for finding a way to go to New Haven! Maybe more of us will be able to work it out. It would be so wonderful to have a large fdl contingent on the ground. Be sure to take tons of pictures and keep us posted as you can. Awesome!
sorry siun for suin…
Thanks BarbaraB.
The backup was the corporate logo with the “quality by design” line on it. That’s usually how I get my titles, from their own literature and logos, or backgrounds.
So I guess D.H. Brooks and old Mr. Addington have a no photo policy.) Where is the Paparazzi when we need them?
Eureka, I saw one, which I think I link to regarding the ‘party pics.’
Hugh 38:
That is extremely interesting. I think Israel has over 1,000 prisoners who have been held for quite a long time. If they comply with that it would be quite amazing. I hope the negoiations you’ve outlined come to pass. It’s heartening to say the least!
Matt O
Isn’t he the very first pix i n the Bat Mitzvah link?
Why isn’t this front page news? Why is this motherfucker not in jail?
Hi Jenny!
.
Hello agave. Nice to see you!
Slideguy
I was wondering whether he and his crappy company are imune from suit or not.
That would be on heck of wrongful death/personal injury suit.
Any tort lawyers in the house?
Drive by …
Hugh @ 38
Keep your eye on the Litani River
http://earthchamber11.blogspot.....-wars.html
http://www.american.edu/ted/ice/litani.htm
Have a great day all!
loose –
Yeah, that’s the picture I was referencing in #43.
ember - I do that all the time … and punaise, I just can’t think of a better vacation!
Hugh - sadly, I do not come close to sharing your optimism and family of friends in Beirut, Ms Rice “not screwing up” is I believe a misunderstanding of the US role in this.
Matt - thank you for highlighting this issue. The number of troops without proper body armor has been so scandalous. One soldier wrote - after the Pentagon was claiming they had solved the problem - when I was corresponding with a number of soldiers in Iraq, their constant worry was the lack of body armor and some received the ceramic inserts but no vests while others got vests with no inserts … for shame!
Thanks.
Nice to see you.
.
Matt, so can you swap them? Cause on my screen WSJ Brooks is still up
Hugh:
I was so hopeful reading your Leb/Isr war could break out into peace…but then I saw:
…”The US and Condoleezza Rice’s role in all this is mostly not to screw up a deal that is begging to be made.”…
—–
Bush/Bolton/Rice et al - ‘Who could imagine?’
—-
Sorry, I’m a tad bitter on this issue and our constantly debauching our overseas overtures. That are perfectly pointed out in that one sentence. I’m convinced it is deliberate sabotage. Peace is War.
loose –
Really? I switched it to the DHB company logo with the motto.
Are you clicking “Refresh Comments” or are you reloading the page?
Reload the page and it should show up with the changed image.
Ok. I hit “refresh” and now I have “quality by design”
Is that what I am supposed to be seeing?
Thanks Matt for a terrific post as per usual.
OfT JennyftB, completely agree, thanks Hugh, I hope, pray you are right. Hezbollah are Shiite and the Shiites work the Saudi Oil fields under a Sunni monarchy. US just announced 2.9 billion dollar deal to send Abrams Tanks over to protect Saudi
oil fieldsinfrastructure.lhp, it was changed around comment 18…
Blank Kluge
I saw your nice little acknowledgement on the last thread. So sweet.
Body armor could be the single ost powerful, wildfire issue in the November elections. Absolutely everybody gets the unfairness and the incompetence of this.
When combined with war profiteering, the sense of injustice is magnified. There WAS enough money but they were too busy passing it out to their buddies. Troop protection? Not so much.
Waiting to hear about your plans for a book :)
ember
Thanx. I just don’t want to see anybody get sued around here. This place is all about fairness and good faith behavior. It’s both a sword and a shield
LHP—the photo was swapped for the DHB logo over thirty minutes ago.
Yeah, the company logo.
Hell, Matt, just go out buy a platoon’s worth of little toy soldiers and some ketchup. Splay the toys around in as chaotic an arrangement as possible. Spray the arrangement w/ketchup (to taste of course, not too much, not too little. You’ll know it when you see it.)
Break out your digital camera and post the results.
—-
Hell, even the Prez could do that…oh, wait. He already is. Every fucking day.
lhp, I was glad you noticed it and spoke up.
egregious
I think you are so right about this being a potent campaign issue. Thank you Matt for bringing it up
Remember all those stories about parents privately buying body armour to ship over to their kids on the battlefaild?
I think every volunteer fire department and girl scout troop on LI did somekind of drive to finance independant buys of body armour.
Or so it seemed.
The very fact that DOD “sole sourced” the contract is what made it so valuable. however the company’s inability to keep up production with demand caused how many uneccesary deaths???
Oh yeah, it Cindy Sheehan all over again. How many irate greiving mothers do you think would speak up on this issue if they were informed about how preventable and unecessary the deaths of their children were?
lhp -
backatcha. You are GOOD. So glad you liked.
…and your little dog, too!
:~>
egregious, hope you were able to get some sleep.
siun, I share your pessimism, but emptywheel has a post where she argues that Condi is getting hammered by Rummy and DeadEye.
Pick Your Incompetent Cabinet Member
by emptywheel
“If I were to tell you a bunch of Republicans were lobbying to get one of Bush’s Cabinet Members fired or transferred for incompetence, who do you think that Cabinet Member would be? And if I told you this person was perceived as botching up the Middle East, being ignorant of the Middle East, allowing our enemies to take advantage of us… And what if I added that these Republicans expect this Cabinet Member’s policy to collapse within a few months?
Well, I guess that last bit–looking to the future for this person’s policy to collapse–is your tip off the conservatives are not calling for the sacking of Donald Rumsfeld, whose policies (notably his fantasy of “Transformation”) have already failed, and with it the entire Iraq War.
Nope, they’re happy with Rummy’s incompetence. It’s Condi they want to get rid of. (Hat tip to lukery.)…”
My take is Condi and a few others have been able to get the shrub to understand at least temporarily that if the Lebanon government falls, Israel is in a world of hurt.
Also since it’s a Republican White House, maybe a few of them remembered the Beirut Memorial, since it happened during Reagan’s tenure. *ilson was the first FDL’er to remind me of it.
ember/lhp –
Again, thanks for letting me know that the joke wasn’t easily picked up for some. I certainly didn’t see that at first.
Thanks again and I hope you didn’t think I was butting heads with you.
Matt
Butting heads? not at all. I was just worried about you catching a world of hurt. The WSJ has mega lawyers.
Matt O. - it can be nice to have an attorney on the staff:).
Matt O — I admit I was one of the slower ones on the uptake, but I was really, REALLY hoping it was the same DB. What I wouldn’t give to find DB’s been on the take, a payola baby.
I probably should poke around and see if DB has ever written anything for Heritage Foundation or TownHall.com — it would be a dead giveaway.
Matt O., If you intentionally exposed a 13 year old girl to public insults and ridicule, you’re reprehensible. If you didn’t intend it, then you’re grossly careless.
You could have posted the fact about the $10,000,000 bat mitzvah without the pictures and without naming the girl.
If what you’ve written about Brooks is true, he’s a criminal who should be brought to justice. But I don’t see the point of tarring the young girl.
Blank Kludge
Lebanon could sputter on for a while. It’s a testosterone thing. What this country can do at this point is to give diplomatic cover for a deal. I’m with you that it’s not clear they’re up to even this. What is going to grate on my nerves is, when and if there is a deal, Bush getting up on his hind legs and acting like his boneheaded ideas had something to do with it.
Rayne:
Now that Rayne’s admitted it… :)
lhp — I’m not a tort lawyer, but basically active military can’t sue for injuries in the line of duty. I know for sure they can’t sue the government, anyway. And sue DHB for what? The article doesn’t say wearing the vest got anyone killed or injured; the defective vests were recalled. You can’t sue a product manufacturer for not manufacturing a product you didn’t use, and it’s the government’s fault that soldiers were sent out without body armor.
The company is being looked at by the SEC, too, the stock’s been delisted, they just settled a shareholder class action, and I wouldn’t bet on a lot of products liability insurance either. The odd thing is that DHB just announced it got another government contract. If you enjoy reading SEC filings — and who, pray tell, does not? — the company website Matt links to has them. If I were more curious, I’d take a look at the contingent liability provisions in the financials, but c’mon. DHB is trading in the pink sheets. Blow on it too hard and it’s in Chapter 11.
Hugh:
If he were ’smart’ he’d share ‘credit’ (unlike ‘blame’) w/Poodle over the Pond.
Sadly more will die as we wait and watch and hope.
(I think W’s ‘thinking’ is reflected by this Fundie-type, who I believe is actually sincere:
Would a cease-fire REALLY save live? or just delay the inevitable..? And I said, if I wake up tommorow alive b/c lack of bombing and bullets, the HELL YES LIVES ARE SAVED!)
—-
gotta shaddup now. making self too crayzee.
Godot.
10 Million dollars for an event. It was stunning when it was first reported and should be brought up at every opportunity.
I feel kind of sorry for his daughter. Will she ever be able to feel as though future celebrations are adequate?
Can anyone remember how much Kenny Boy’s birthday party for his wife cost?
Matt O. : I am so proud to read you, because I just know someday we’ll say, “We knew him way back when…”
No conservative, not one, that I’ve talked to about this has been willing to say he or she is concerned about the body armor issue.
Why do they think voicing criticism is so unpatriotic? Did the whole wingersphere go nuts after 9/11?
jim
IIRC the story of the $10 mill party was fairly widely reported. I seem to recall the Aerosmith and Fitty Cent thing being talked about in the MSM.
So, Matt didn’t “out” the kid. her father did.
The damn bat-mitzvah story is from the New York Daily News which has a monster circulation http://www.nydailynews.com/new.....4735c.html
The body armor issue was out there as the perfect issue for the last presidential along with the lack of uparmored humvees … a number of us hoped Kerry would run hard on it but while he mentioned it at times, he never took it on as a critical example of the disaster that is W.
On Lebanon, the assumption that the US wants things to settle down is off I think … this is not a surprise to Washington and the rush shipments of more arms and the veto of a ceasefire certainly are not signs of an admin that wants resolution … today, Israel was bombing on the border with Syria … just barely inside Lebanon and W was talking tough yesterday on Iran (read the transcripts of his press con with Poodle).
The ray of hope depends on accepting the idea that Israel has the right to invade other countries at will, to murder 600 civilians and destroy the infrastructure and the environment (see oil spill on Lebanon coast) … this is not hope, these are war crimes and we are funding them.
Jim at 74 - this was greatly broadcast, I am sure, Internationally.
Jim –
I understand your point. However, I want to point out that I didn’t name her myself. Indirectly, yes, but not by writing her name out in the post.
I would also like to point out that any that searches for articles on the party itself produces her name. I just wanted to show people pictures of the event.
Sources like the Jerusalem Post, sfgate.com, etc. all named her. I didn’t.
In fact, C&L wrote a post on it, hat tipping Paul Rieckhoff from IAVA, linking to the GNN site that I linked to. Additionally, C&L linked to the NYDN post about the party that specifically names her.
Sleep is highly overrated anyway. (4am here)
Usually I don’t make tiny corrections but single post important => single most important. Though if this one post were to be published in a nationally read newspaper….
last year, the circulation of the NY Daily News was 735,536.
I think it’s odd that a newbie commenter like “Jim” should leap to the spurious defense of a war profiteer who has an obscene sense of pecuniary ostentation …
Good post, and you didn’t even have to get into the part where the Army stopped allowing troops to supply their own armor, like the superior Dragon Skin and faked tests to make it look like they were doing this inthe troops best interests instead of trying to protect DHB’s stock price.
Margot
i don’t think the right wing rank and file could concieve of the level of evil it would take to deliberately enter into a contract for body armour that would cause an insuffcient supply chain to meet demand.
you know it used to be that contracting officers in the various departments were career civil servants. It was bushco that suddenly made them political appointees.
At the time, when I first heard about it, I was puzzled b/c these jobs are hard tedious work and do not pay spectacularly well, had no glamour, ewtc. and didn’t seem like they would be attractive patronage positions.
You realize that the “Plum Book” under Bushco is the bigggest it has ever been? you know that, right?
Now, after Savafian. After what Bunnytine had to say when she blew the whistle, NOW after the harm has been done, I get to smack my hand on the forhead and say “of course”.
It was hidden in plain sight.
The information contained in this post is obscene, ranging from the sole-supplier contract to Brooks’ $70 million in compensation to the $10 million Bat Mitzvah, but the most obscene part is the failure of the body armor to do what the government paid Brooks for it to do.
flounder –
I wish I had the time to fully document such things. But I remember a dKos post on the Dragon Skin vest that included videos of its testing.
Jim wrt to your 5:10
1. Could you dial it back a little, because you’re addressing someone who posts at FDL.
We always try to treat our posters with respect and the appropriate “tone.” The tolerances wrt “tone” are more generous if you want to go after a commenter.
2. I appreciate your desire to take the high road. I think that’s a good thing, but
Brooks is heavily insulated as a result of being a neocon at the NYT’s and we’re not playing canasta here.
If we have a soundbyte or photo that’s accurate, “works” and doesn’t meet the legal definition of slander, I’m not sure we’re in a position to not use it, because it doesn’t meet our high moral standards. It’s our tax dollars funding those bombs falling on Lebanon and paying for torture in secret prisons.
My # 88
that should be “do NOT pay spectacularly well”
flounder - In the heat of the dragon skin/prohibition of using own armour news… (IIRC) I believe Rumsfield was outfitted with dragon skin. It was explained that he was just testing it.
This post raises a number of questions, the answers to which will never provide solace to any family which lost a loved one who was killed wearing inferior body armor, or any family left to care for a servicemember injured while wearing this crap.
One - who did Brooks know that he was able to get this exclusive contract?
Two - who on the other end of the contract was asking the questions - one of which should have been “how is this company qualified to produce this item?”
Three - who in the Pentagon is charged with overseeing quality control - shouldn’t someone have to make sure that the product performs as it is supposed to?
Four - why is our government unable to find someone to make a quality product at a reasonable price?
Five - when it became clear that the body armor was defective and/or ineffective, why didn’t the government make sure that each soldier was issued a replacement product?
Six - who decided that troops wearing non-government-issued body armor would forfeit government benefits and/or life insurance if killed or injured wearing it, forcing troops to choose between armor known to be defective - which could get them killed - and armor proven to be of better quality that might save their lives?
Seven - what will it take to hold our government accountable for the lives it is sending into harm’s way?
This stuff just makes my blood boil. Considering the number of things that have that effect on me these days, it’s a wonder my blood has not been reduced to sludge.
Jim,
This party was widely reported in the Corporate Media. I even knew some of the details, and I don’t waste my time on the gossip pages.
You will hear me talk about not dragging kids into an argument about their parents, but this kid was arguably already made into a public figure by her father’s efforts. So, future Judy Miller anyone?
Agave: Hey, good to see you here. There are quite a few Atriots here.
J in Sacto: *waves*. Are you going to Drinking Liberally this Thursday?
I am sure that our troops loved hearing about the 10 million dollar event while they were piecing together scraps of body armour. It would certainly go over equally well all over the world.
John –
Thanks for the defense. However, you wrote, “you’re addressing someone who posts at FDL,” and I don’t want anybody here to think I must be curtsied or addressed as mister, etc. I’m just a regular Joe that cares. I hope to be spoken to with respect, sure, but at the same time I wouldn’t want anybody to hold back criticism, right or wrong, either.
2. It sounds like you think this David Brooks is the columnist, which it isn’t. I specifically changed the heading picture because some people didn’t understand that it was a joke because of the similar names. I apologize for getting anybody confused on that.
egragious - if you are still here - and anyone who missed my note yesterday …
an update on MFI - he is just back from Iraq and is horrified by what he saw on the ground there … says it is the worst he has seen (and he served as peacekeeper in Bosnia and Lebanon at their worst) - he is extremely concerned for what is happening to children there and the number forced to do dreadful things simply to eat … and he is very concerned about reports in Iraqi press of an upcoming dissolution of the already ruined elected govt:
http://gorillasguides.blogspot.....e-and.html
for a sense of what Lebanese think of Ms Rice, see his latest post at the link in my name above.
Matt O- Yeah there was a Dkos post, to find anything on their search takes me all day. The test was from the Dragon Skin manufacturer. The Pentagon claimed it did its own tests and that it wasn’t up to snuff. The thing is no one has seen any documentation from those tests or that they even exist. Does bring up the point ember makes that Rummy, generals, and special forces keep using the armor that isn’t good enough for the infantry.
Guess I missed Jim’s comments (just spilled an entire cup of coffee on my keyboard), but the daughter’s lavish party is in the public domain.
Matt, your post is really wonderful and I have learned a lot by reading it.
Thanks Matt.
Thanks for catching that I whiffed on Bobo. I was so hopeful it was him, but….
Looks like we have a new troll, how droll. Key philosophical question: concern, or ping?
what is a “ping troll”? Is that someone who pings the site with a link to their own article and that article is a thumbs down on the post? My guess…???
siun,
I hope you can find some way to get mfi’s account of Iraq into the CT press before August 8.
Bush has a lid on the bad news getting out about how bad it is.
WaPo had a terrific story last week from the US soldier’s pov about how bad it is, but that doesn’t begin to tell the real tragedy.
Department of Defense that outlined the armor specifications and not the manufacturer.
———————
I am curious who designed the armor and why the DOD put forth faulty designs?
egrigious
What is a ping troll? Like a driveby?
JennyftB, see 5:10.
oh heck- my cookies got scrambled again!!!
Hiya Matt O. !!!! xxoo M/VG
Eureka
From back in my Office of Inspector general days:
One of the best ways to rig a contract is to make yourRFP or design spec such that only one manufacturer can meet it. Sometimes so it won’t be too, too obvious they list is as “as designed or as equal” and then reject every proposed substitution as not being equal.
This is contract fraud/bid rigging 101.
I remeber reading about the flaws and if I remeber the vests were not up to specs. The ceramic was brittle, They took one shot and broke like a dinner plate, leaving the soldier with a bag of shards and dust on his chest
Maybe ping is the wrong term. Darn, and after I read the whole wiki article John Casper gave us.
It’s possible that sleep isn’t highly overrated after all.
lhp and M/VG - I think it is a drive-by but egregious is the expert.