<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judiciary Committee FISA Hearing, Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:15:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HopeSpringsATurtle</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-207065</link>
		<dc:creator>HopeSpringsATurtle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-207065</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Shouldn’t I just cc my emails to hubby to the WH just to save the gov’t a little money? I think of myself as a ‘liberal, fiscal conservative’…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This makes me smokin’ mad.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn’t I just cc my emails to hubby to the WH just to save the gov’t a little money? I think of myself as a ‘liberal, fiscal conservative’…</p>
<p>This makes me smokin’ mad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egregious</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-207046</link>
		<dc:creator>egregious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-207046</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;mui at 109 &lt;i&gt;*ilson, how about a little furriner love chat that’s wily and inscrutable, would that come under the program?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Mui we have been enjoying your little chats.  Got ‘em all right here.  “Hugs and kisses”!!&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;———HALliburton 9000&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mui at 109 <i>*ilson, how about a little furriner love chat that’s wily and inscrutable, would that come under the program?</i></p>
<p><b>Mui we have been enjoying your little chats.  Got ‘em all right here.  “Hugs and kisses”!!</b> </p>
<p>———HALliburton 9000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lotus</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206992</link>
		<dc:creator>lotus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206992</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Philo, are you here?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I FINALLY got through to Brent Woolfork on FLA Nelson’s staff just now:  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sen. Beel hasn’t announced a position on S.2453 yet because it’s still in Judiciary (BW: ” … and I’m watching that hearing right now”) and he’s on Commerce, but he IS very concerned about all this electronic-surveillance stuff, etc., etc., and when it comes to the Senate flo–&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Well, Brent, [sez I] I hope you’ll ask the Senator for me — FOR ALL OF US — to get with his colleagues on Judiciary and ask them to kill this thing before it ever reaches the Senate floor.  [Launch into talking points via, “Don’t you suspect that, if Specter’d been in the Senate during Watergate, he’d have called for &lt;i&gt;burglary&lt;/i&gt; to be legalized if Nixon had authorized it?”  I ended up with something like] We’ve GOT to have Sen. Nelson stand up against the most out-Nixoning-Nixon, un-American stuff we’ve ever heard of!”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BW: “Uh-huhUh-huhUh-huhYesMa’amUh-huhYes’mUh-huh!  I’ll certainly tell the Senator all about this.  Thank you!” (But he couldn’t have been taking notes and doing all that Uh-huhing both.)  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;General impression on this end: put FLA Nelson down for “a &lt;i&gt;leaning-our-way&lt;/i&gt; wiggler” and his office for “DEFINITELY paying full attention.”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philo, are you here?</p>
<p>I FINALLY got through to Brent Woolfork on FLA Nelson’s staff just now:  </p>
<p>Sen. Beel hasn’t announced a position on S.2453 yet because it’s still in Judiciary (BW: ” … and I’m watching that hearing right now”) and he’s on Commerce, but he IS very concerned about all this electronic-surveillance stuff, etc., etc., and when it comes to the Senate flo–</p>
<p>“Well, Brent, [sez I] I hope you’ll ask the Senator for me — FOR ALL OF US — to get with his colleagues on Judiciary and ask them to kill this thing before it ever reaches the Senate floor.  [Launch into talking points via, “Don’t you suspect that, if Specter’d been in the Senate during Watergate, he’d have called for <i>burglary</i> to be legalized if Nixon had authorized it?”  I ended up with something like] We’ve GOT to have Sen. Nelson stand up against the most out-Nixoning-Nixon, un-American stuff we’ve ever heard of!”</p>
<p>BW: “Uh-huhUh-huhUh-huhYesMa’amUh-huhYes’mUh-huh!  I’ll certainly tell the Senator all about this.  Thank you!” (But he couldn’t have been taking notes and doing all that Uh-huhing both.)  </p>
<p>General impression on this end: put FLA Nelson down for “a <i>leaning-our-way</i> wiggler” and his office for “DEFINITELY paying full attention.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blank Kludge</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206972</link>
		<dc:creator>Blank Kludge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206972</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;continuing up new thread…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>continuing up new thread…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blank Kludge</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206969</link>
		<dc:creator>Blank Kludge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206969</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Schmidt:&lt;br /&gt;
Tell (or I say ‘take’) it to the judge. That’s THEIR job; not YOURS or PRes. Do yours, and let the pros handle it. Constitional questions go there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cites guy Levy, helped draft FISA. But can’t (me) follow exactly his point.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schmidt:<br />
Tell (or I say ‘take’) it to the judge. That’s THEIR job; not YOURS or PRes. Do yours, and let the pros handle it. Constitional questions go there.</p>
<p>Cites guy Levy, helped draft FISA. But can’t (me) follow exactly his point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Bong</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206965</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Bong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206965</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OT:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Iran joins the fray…&lt;b&gt;ARRRRRRRGHHHHH!!!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Surrounded by yellow Hezbollah flags, more than 60 Iranian volunteers set off Wednesday to join what they called a holy war against Israeli forces in Lebanon.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Linky: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/07/26/iran.volunteers.ap/index.html&quot;&gt;http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/.....index.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;lotus - more, please??&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT:</p>
<p>Iran joins the fray…<b>ARRRRRRRGHHHHH!!!</b></p>
<p><i>TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Surrounded by yellow Hezbollah flags, more than 60 Iranian volunteers set off Wednesday to join what they called a holy war against Israeli forces in Lebanon.</i></p>
<p>Linky: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/07/26/iran.volunteers.ap/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/&#8230;..index.html</a></p>
<p>lotus &#8211; more, please??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blank Kludge</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206964</link>
		<dc:creator>Blank Kludge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206964</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;insert ‘t’ plz.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;‘Profiles in Cowardness.’ indeed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;…&lt;br /&gt;
witness ties it in with NetNeutrality. Mebbe I had that in earlier thread after all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;—-&lt;br /&gt;
tech change does not authorise overriding privacy principles. Nice.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>insert ‘t’ plz.</p>
<p>‘Profiles in Cowardness.’ indeed.</p>
<p>…<br />
witness ties it in with NetNeutrality. Mebbe I had that in earlier thread after all.</p>
<p>—-<br />
tech change does not authorise overriding privacy principles. Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drouse</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206963</link>
		<dc:creator>drouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206963</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&gt;I’m convinced Specter and Bush are playing a  bizarre bluffing game, in which Bush wants to seize even more power than he has (because he’s the president, dammit!), and Specter wants to give him as much power as he needs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That is exactly what he is doing. Sec. 801 if left in the bill will plant the idea of the unitary executive in law. You just know that Bush’s four vote block will just jump at the chance. That means they only have to convince one justice to agree with it and then we’re all screwed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;I’m convinced Specter and Bush are playing a  bizarre bluffing game, in which Bush wants to seize even more power than he has (because he’s the president, dammit!), and Specter wants to give him as much power as he needs</p>
<p>That is exactly what he is doing. Sec. 801 if left in the bill will plant the idea of the unitary executive in law. You just know that Bush’s four vote block will just jump at the chance. That means they only have to convince one justice to agree with it and then we’re all screwed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mui</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206956</link>
		<dc:creator>mui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206956</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good on Jim Dempsey.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on Jim Dempsey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Canyon 2</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206957</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple Canyon 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/26/judiciary-committee-fisa-hearing-part-i/#comment-206957</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Chris #114,&lt;br /&gt;
“Profiles in Cowardice,” Good one and you are so right!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris #114,<br />
“Profiles in Cowardice,” Good one and you are so right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.297 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 10:18:41 -->

