
Head On is a proud sponsor of Late Edition With Wolf Blitzer. You apply it directly to your forehead. My question is: What happens if you apply it to some other body part?
Today, the head-on collision that is North Korea was Topic A on the Head Shows. Not much comedy there. And all of the panels touched on the Lamont/Lieberman contest -- Causing me to apply my palm directly to my forehead, several times.
Meet the Press was preempted by Wimbledon in my locality. But you can read the transcript here, if you're so inclined.
This Week With George Stephanopoulos featured Sen. Richard Lugar (R-IN) on North Korea, the Webb vs. Allen Senate race in Virginia and a roundtable with George Will, Peter Beinart of The New Republic and Donna Brazile.
Dick Lugar thinks that Bush is on the right course on North Korea, namely, the Six Party Talks (6PT). Lugar agrees that it's okay to have 1 on 1 talks inside the 6PT, but not outside. (huh?) The U.S. should work with China, because there can be no change if China is shoring up North Korea. According to Lugar, Japan sees North Korea's missile tests as a national threat, and is prepared to produce nuclear weapons in response. Then we'll have an arms race in Asia. Lugar essentially agreed that North Korea has gotten more dangerous on Bush's watch. It has made $1.5 billion selling missiles to third parties in recent years. Also, a poll in South Korea finds its citizens are equating North Korea and America in terms of threats to South Korea. "Young South Korea" doesn't remember the Korean war.
Lugar says reports of a rape by U.S. soldiers, Haditha, etc. are damaging to America's standing in Iraq, but Iraq also sees that America is addressing the problem through military justice. Sectarian violence in Baghdad is "all too real," but Iraq's regular forces are beginning to crack down on the Iraqi militia.
Stephanopoulos interviewed both Jim Webb and George Allen in taped pieces, but interviewed Allen second and gave Allen the opportunity to respond to (Stephanopoulos' characterization) of Webb's answers. In response to questions about the length of U.S. military presence in Iraq, Webb noted that Bush was building four permanent and "huge" military bases and planned for us to be in Iraq for 30 years. Webb didn't favor the Congressional Dems' resolutions re: withdrawal, but thinks we should be out of Iraq in two years. Allen responded that Webb wanted to "duck tail and run," and robotically repeated the Bush line that withdrawal should depend on circumstances on the ground. Allen's also chuffed that Saddam Hussein's in prison rather than in one of his palaces.
Questioned about running as a Democrat after being a part of the Reagan Administration, Webb said that if Ronnie was alive today, he might wonder where his party had gone. Webb was a Republican in light of Democratic foreign policy post-Vietnam, but after 9/11, he felt more aligned with Dems in matters of fairness and economic justice. Allen expressed skepticism that the Gipper would be a member of the party of John Kerry, Harry Reid and Tom Daschle. Allen also denied, unconvincingly, that he was a rubber-stamp Republican, citing his difference with Bush on immigration reform.
During the roundtable, George Stephanopoulos characterized Ned Lamont's message as "Lieberman is with Bush on the war, so Democrats have to be against Joe." Lamont is, Steph says, simply a one issue candidate popular with "left-wing activists, particularly in the blogosphere." Not surprisingly, George Will agreed with Steph and raised him one, stating that anti-Joe Democrats are exhibiting "monomania." Will assured viewers that Joe is a "good liberal." Not to be outdone, Donna Brazile declared "I'm a Joe Lieberman Democrat." She allowed, however, that Lamont's challenge was good for the party because he had ignited a "healthy debate." Peter Beinart also piped up, claiming that activist Dems want a lockstep party, making it harder for pols to "go offer the reservation" (by representing the wishes of their constituents) These Dems, says Pete, "see Karl Rove as their role model."
Will asserted that North Korea was a problem without a solution, declaring himself of a proponent of the conservative philosophy that there are limits on the United States' ability to shape a recalcitrant world. Brazile asserted that North Korea is a fiasco for Bush. On the New York Court of Appeals' ruling against marriage equality, Beinart claimed the ruling was positive, because public opinion is growing more accepting of gay marriage, whereas court recognition of equal rights only "retards that movement" and causes backlash. Will thinks federalism is the solution: let some states experiment with gay marriage and see what happens.
Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer (Second Hour) opened with a Nic Robertson report from Iraq. The news is bad: two bombs in a Shia market killed 10 and injured 25. Meanwhile, Shiite militia squads are roaming freely in Baghdad, checking papers, killing Sunnis and leaving "piles of bodies." I guess Nic hadn't watched Dick Lugar on This Week.
Wolf then welcomed Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). (I can't remember the last Sunday I didn't see Graham's well-scrubbed mug on one of these shows.) Boxer again called for a prompt withdrawal of forces from Iraq, noting that, during her last visit to the country, General Casey asserted that a long-term presence is counterproductive. In addition, 87 percent of Iraqis want a timeline. American troops are in the middle of a "nightmare" and a "civil war." Lindsey Graham "wishes" we could disarm the militias, which, as they say, is not a plan. He also asserts that every time we give the Iraqi government a goal, they meet the goal, so they should be able to overcome the militias. Lindsay supports a timeline for withdrawal -- but only if it comes from the elected officials of Iraq.
In a shocking development, Boxer rejected Nouri al-Maliki's call for reconsideration of immunity for American forces accused of crimes in Iraq. She wouldn't trust the Iraqi government to try an American citizen. Graham -- did you know he was a reserve JAG officer? -- agrees that troops are best tried by the American military.
Wolf asked Senator Boxer if she in fact plans to stump for Holy Joe in the Nutmeg State. Boxer answered in the affirmative, stating that she's going to spend "a couple of hours" telling Connecticutians everything she knows about Joe. Joe's aces on the environment, it seems. Boxer refuses to say what she'll do if Joe loses the primary. Graham stops short of stumping for Joe, but "he's a big fan of Joe" and has the "utmost respect for him," seeing as Joe recognizes that Iraq's the frontline in the Global War on Terror. (Recognizes? Hell, Joe was present at the creation.)
On North Korea, Boxer thinks the 6PTs are essential, but there's nothing wrong with some back channel talks, maybe with a special envoy. The shape of the table doesn't matter. Graham says the Chinese are the key to the North Korea problem; they must join the world in hardline diplomacy.
In a segment on terrorism, CNN's Peter Bergen said the New York subway plot was more serious than that of the Miami terrorist wannabes; not a "huge deal" but definitely worth stopping. Bergen scoffed at Abu Gonzales' suggestion that loose cells not a part of al-Qaeda are the new new threat, since al-Qaeda has reconstituted itself on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border and the heads of al-Qaeda are still on the loose. Bergen pronounced himself astounded by the DHS decision to cut New York anti-terror funding by 40 percent, as NYC is still a central target.
Blitzer also interviewed the military and civilian defense lawyers in the Hamdan case, Neal Katyal and Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift. Katyal scoffed at Bush's claim that the Supreme Court "accepted" the use of Gitmo in its Hamdan opinion, stating that claim was the equivalent of one that the high court approved $4.00/gallon gas prices. It was simply not an issue in the case.
Fox News Sunday The first guest was Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns, and the subjects were North Korea and Iran. Burns' talking point was multi-tracking. Burns is hoping for a Security Council resolution re: North Korea in the next several days. Meanwhile, Bush and Condi are in touch with regional leaders, asking China to exert its influence on North Korea. And, of course, there's the 6PT.
Burns claims that the U.S. has been successful in isolating North Korea and Iran. Regarding Iran, those wily Iranians thought they could divide the world community, but our coalition is in full effect. Time's almost up for the Iranians to respond to that June 1 coalition proposal re: dis/non-armament. We'll know this week if the Iranians are serious or just dicking us around. (I paraphrase.)
On North Korea, Rep. Peter Hoekstra says that the key is international pressure, even though Korea will never keep its word no matter what the world does. Asked about his letter to Bush suggesting that Bush had violated the law by keeping the House Intelligence Committee in the dark about his secret programs, Hoekstra said that the letter triggered a briefing on at least one previously undisclosed program. Ex-CIA chief James Woolsey also thinks China must "lean hard" on North Korea, if it doesn't want four new nuclear neighbors (Japan, North Korea, South Korea and Taiwan). During this segment, FOX displayed a graphic asserting that Kim Jong Il "loves western music and congac." (Other turn-ons: starving masses and platform shoes.)
In the first panel segment, Bill Kristol declared himself disgusted with Bush on North Korea. He pronounced Burns' "complicated world" rhetoric and talk of U.N. resolutions a throwback to the Clinton Adminstration. Kristol wants to dump the 6PTs, tighten sanctions on N. Korea and make Korean nukes a litmus test for relations with China. Hume was dismissive of the Korean threat, citing the failure of the recent missile tests. He thinks sanctions are a non-starter, given China's veto on the Security Council. Mara Liasson recalled Bush's axis of evil rhetoric, stating that it made Bush look even more impotent when he couldn't deliver. She believes the military option has been all but ruled out.
The panel also spoke of Holy Joe, who is, according to Wallace, fighting for his life. Hume states that Joe's troubles are evidence how far the Democratic Party has moved to the left. The anti-war faction is now the dominant force in the the Democratic Party, and it's all to Bush's benefit. Kristol claimed that Hillary Clinton went out of her way to state she'd support the winner of the Connecticut primary because she fears the left. Kristol thinks that Lamont can beat Lieberman. Wallace also floated the fantasy that Tom DeLay might win if he remained on the ballot in Texas in November; not even Kristol thought that might happen.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Fitz?
Now that that’s out of the way, what did the heads say today?
Been waiting Roger! Thanks for watching so we don’t have to.
well, when you’ve got Boxer and Lindsay Graham stumping for the same candidate, you kinda have to stop and scratch your head.
Head On Collision
I was afraid it was another Zinedine Zidane thread for a second…
In response to questions about the length of U.S. military presence in Iraq, Webb noted that Bush was building four permanent and “huge” military bases and planned for us to be in Iraq for 30 years.
Me: So I guess we can safely say that Iraq has at least a 30 year supply of oil.
I imagine that our troops will return before the 2008 Election and the paid Halliburton guys will stay to keep the order.
Funny thing. Since I stopped watching the Sunday Republican Week in Reviews, the Nightly News, and CNN….my BP has gone way down and I don’t get hedaches anymore. Coincience? I think not.
I appreciate the PSA from FDL, though. Not having to waste a pefectly fine Sunday AM questioning my sanity is a very good thing.
cc 6 — someone should tell Bush you can’t get the oil out of the country with an ongoing civil war.
These Dems, says Pete, “see Karl Rove as their role model.”
My head just exploded.
George Stephanopoulos totally has some manpris.
I would bet Lindsay Graham has some, too.
Lina: First someone needs to tell him there is a civil war.
The anti-war faction is now the dominant force in the the Democratic Party, and it’s all to Bush’s benefit.
When was the last time Hume said ANYTHING didn’t accrue to Bush’s benefit? “When in doubt, say ‘this is great for Bush.’”
Kristol claimed that Hillary Clinton went out of her way to state she’d support the winner of the Connecticut primary because she fears the left. Kristol thinks that Lamont can beat Lieberman.
Well Holy Joe collected the George Will endorsement, anyway. And that’s the important thing.
Wallace also floated the fantasy that Tom DeLay might win if he remained on the ballot in Texas in November; not even Kristol thought that might happen.
But it would be good for Bush.
Okay I was just bullshitting about the manpris. Now I’m going to have to do the post, huh?
Given their characterization of Ned Lamont and the blogs that support him, do you think they might be more accurate on any other topic?
Talk about a decadent, degenrate class of royalists just begging to be sent into retirement!
Yes, that’s why they sit behind the desk on the set so nobody knows they have manpris on. They sure act like clam diggers.
ccmask,
They’ll bring home a few and splatter the homecoming all over the TV. They’ll keep the ones they are sending to replace them a secret, and the contractors will continue to be overpaid killers.
Graham — did you know he was a reserve JAG officer?
I think of him as more of an unreserved jag-off.
I hope the clams win.
Thanks Roger for the good wrap up. On the HBO Luis Black Special, he was talking about how crazy his parents get when they watch these shows and how he has to throw them a chew toy to calm them down. That’s how I used to get before you Roger.
I hope the clams win.
Admit it, you dig them.
And George Bush was busy applying vodka to his tomato juice.
I smell some big parades for Memorial Day. Maybe Bush will kiss Pickles in Times Square for added effect.
-GSD
When I am confronted by a pair of manpris, my hands get cold and clammy.
lol–Jane is gonna get us for this. I can’t wait to see the graphic.
OK, grunion. But only occasionally. I can’t help myself when they begin to run…!
OK, grunion. But only occasionally. I can’t help myself when they begin to run…!
Grunion with the Devil…
OT:
‘Gotta meet the Gurneys and a dozen gray attorneys… ‘
;>)
Nice one darkblack. How do you do that so good? It’s really perfect.
GSD #23:
Yeah, Memorial Day. I’m sure we’ll hear so very much from our incumbent pols about the sacrifices of our military, even as they continue to be staked like goats ouside the village, hoping to draw the lions.
That’s right around Katrina plus-one time, too, is it not? More speechifying, no action. Can’t wait.
darkblack, if ol’ Joe would just put a little engine and a pair of headlights on that thing, the victim could be to the next hospital in practically no time.
Oh wait. I’m thinking of Labor Day. Chao time.
What the fuck is a “Lieberman Democrat?”
Must read reality check. Hello George?
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/s.....ry_id=3525
I think I speak for many persons of discriminating taste. I am violently opposed to manpris.
Why does Mr. Kristol get to be on these panels anyway acting like he is an authority figure instead of a gop shill. It is really too much.
Tommy
A “Lieberman Democrat” is someone who has just kissed the Democratic Party goodbye, and flipped it off for good measure.
What the fuck is a “Lieberman Democrat?”
A Bush Republican in Democratic Drag . . .
DB #28: Sweet!
What the fuck is a “Lieberman Democrat?”
It’s a bit like a jumbo shrimp.
A Lieberman Democrat is a sleeper Republican who uses reverse psychology by printing false bumper stickers about himself to confuse the enemy but instead confuses himself. I would love to put one on his car.
See this is why I’m not in politics. I just couldn’t sit at a roundtable and listen to that crap being spewed without starting to punch those people hehe.
How you even watch them and listen to them closely enough to summarize what they are saying is beyond me….I just can’t listen to them anymore.
I do watch the McLaughlin Group religiously though, but man Tony Blankley raises my BP :)
Thanks, ccmask.
neurophius…I’m thinking Briggs & Stratton 3 hp’s for the whole state.
;>)
Donna Brazile is a total embarassment. Of course, so is George Staphlococcus, but he’s got the little man’s microphone now.
Hey darkblack: How about Lieberman in Manpris?
OK, I haven’t watched Sunday talk shows in … well, I never did watch them, and after reading Roger’s wrap-ups these past few weeks, I see that it was time well spent … doing whatever else I may have been doing. Relatively.
al-Scooter @30, Katrina 1 is August 29, about a week before Labor Day (not Memorial Day)
darkblack
Leaverman is a liberal, I’m sure he’ll support federal funding for the Briggs & Strattons…oh, no, I guess not. That would send the wrong message.
cleter - your eyes see into the soul. As soon as you mentioned Sen. Graham, I could see him in manpris. The ones with the patch pockets.
>>>>>>>>>>>
How horrible that the left wing bloggers have DRUG the party, kicking and screaming, so far to the left that their conerns on things like the Iraq war, NSA surveillance, govt spending run amok, etc. are being voiced by such well known hardlefties as Bruce Bartlett, Brent Scowcroft, Bruce Fein, John Dean, Paul O’Neill, Pat Buchanan and Bill Buckle;
so far off center that only guys like Schwarzkopf and a slew of recently retired officer and generals — all liberal weenies — can begin to see the blogs point that Rumsfeld is almost as bad as the Algerian ice pirates;
so opposite of right that they would dare to opine, with the agreement of only 80 percent of the American populace, that Dick Cheney is a bad guy and needs to go.
How dare the left “add itself” to the middle and end up being reflected in the 60 % of Americans who don’t want to have a beer with Bush?
Hume is famous for — what, exactly?
I too am very glad that Roger and you other good folk do the recap and spare me the tooth grinding rage that seeing these shows live sends me into. Hell just Donna Brazile declaring herself a Joe Liebermand Democrat means my dentist can make another boat payment this month.
AC #46:
Yeah, got my holidays mixed up. Wonder if W(hatshisface) will still be at the ranch on 8/29 or if he’ll do some more NOLA photo-ops.
Jim - they make rubber mouthpieces for that sort of thing. Check em’ out before losing you molars.
al-Scooter
Doesn’t John McCain have a birthday around that time? I’m sure Bush won’t want to miss that…
al-Scooter @50 For the record, Laura B has been to New Orleans (I think) seven times now since the big K. As someone I know says, why doesn’t she just buy a house here (or better yet, a FEMA trailer)?
Laura Bush: concern troll.
McCain was born on August 29, 1936. Wouldn’t that make him older than Reagan when he took office, if he should get elected president?
I can’t stay up for the pantaloons. I have an 8:00 meeting in the morning…good nite all.
ccmask @ 8:56 pm (#36) - I’m wondering who would be invited on as “authorities”, and then it struck me that there used to be these people called “journalists” on these shows. The idea was that they would learn as much as the could about the subject, and then ask questions about it.
Thankfully, we’ve outgrown the need for such things.
neuro #52:
After this last week, I don’t think the boyz will be feeding each other birthday cake this year.
Hume is famous for his role as “Bub” the zombie in “Day of the Dead”.
-GSD
So, did FDL get a little largesse from Big Pharma for the product placement at the top of the post?
For some reason, that combined with the “Head-On Collision” headline reminded me of one evening I spent (working) in a bar, where a half-drunk Scotsman explained to me the finer points of delivering a “Glasgow Kiss” (in essence, that’s a head-butt) …
After this last week, I don’t think the boyz will be feeding each other birthday cake this year.
Well then, when’s Joe’s birthday?
I wish Bush would deliver a “Glasgow Kiss” to his good buddy Lieberman…
McCain is going to let Bush anally inject his birthday cake as Bush gives Nacho Lieberman a reach around.
-GSD
A Glasgow Kiss Of Death?
Feb. 24th.
darkblack — that is genius. I’ve got the perfect post to go with it tomorrow.
Joseph Isadore Lieberman, (born February 24, 1942)
Feb. 24th.
No wonder he’s so desperate to get re-elected. I bet Bush won’t come to his party if he’s not a senator anymore.
Joseph Isadore Lieberman, (born February 24, 1942)
Hey, isn’t 65 retirement age?
neuro @62, I’d actually pay good money to see those two Butt Heads!
ccmask @ 45:
Joe in a mankini would be far more….revealing.
However, we must ‘think of the children’…The untold damage that could be caused by even the briefest glimpse of such a thing…
;>)
He’s already come to Bush’s party. Long since.
Feb 24th is Lieberman’s birthday (1942).
Joe in a mankini would be far more….revealing.
A Liebermankini.
Mary @ 9:04 pm (#48) - Hume is famous for — what, exactly?
By the look of him, I’d say it’s a world record has something to do with consuming lemons.
Darkblacks got a million of ‘em. Acchcchhaachhaaa!
-GSD
“I bet Bush won’t come to his party if he’s not a senator anymore.”
What do you mean, Eli? By then, he’ll be secretary of defense!
darkblack
“Joe in a mankini would be far more….revealing.”
I dare you.
What do you mean, Eli? By then, he’ll be secretary of defense!
Secretary of defensiveness, maybe.
Posted Sunday, Jul. 9, 2006
Could Tom DeLay be headed back to the House? A source close to the ex-Congressman tells TIME that DeLay is planning an aggressive campaign to retake the House seat he quit in June if an appeals court lets stand a ruling by a federal judge last week that his name must stay on November’s ballot–even though he has moved to Virginia. “If it isn’t overturned, Katy bar the door!” says a G.O.P. official. “Guess he’ll have to fire up the engines on the campaign and let ‘er rip.” DeLay, awaiting trial for money laundering, never intended to fade away. He plans to give paid speeches and has signed a deal to have his bio penned by best-selling author Stephen Mansfield. But to run, DeLay would have to raise money fast: his campaign fund has well under $1 million left. At least he knows his would-be opponent well: ex-Congressman Nick Lampson’s original district was eliminated in a redistricting engineered by DeLay.
darkblack at 28, that’s hilarious.
AC at 60, that reminds me of those Foster’s beer commercials, where they teach you “how to talk Australian.” The one for “locksmith” features a guy head-butting a door to open it. Of course, Foster’s isn’t an Australian beer at all, but let’s not tell the children that.
a roundtable with George Will, Peter Beinart of The New Republic and Donna Brazile.
Looks like three Republicans to me. (quickly ducking Bob Somerby’s fist.) When are we gonna get some Democrats on these shows?
Darkblack RE: neurophius @78, NO! Please don’t! I’d have to look, and I’m not sure my eyes can take it ( … doctor my eyes, tell me what is wrong was I unwise to leave them open for so long …)
“When are we gonna get some Democrats on these shows?”
How about a Democrat–or even a Republican!–who doesn’t support Joe Lieberman for reelection?
JH @ 66:
‘One person’s genius is another’s agenda-driven troublemaker’… ;>) …Ta, Jane.
You shouldn’t dare me, neurophius. Only a cheap laugh at the expense of the powerful can result.
>:-)
The Fox News farm team in action.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=819OMATs4lc
*Spew warning.
-GSD
darkblack
They can afford it
It’s not particularly rational but I always assume that the only people reading this blog are those that are commenting. I know it’s not true but I just believe that the 10-20 people participating in any particular discussion are the only ones in the room.
I think a few more people may be reading it than I think.
The Fox News farm team in action.
Has everyone seen Atlas Shrugged’s latest video blog? It’s a Love Trainwreck.
What the fuck is a “Lieberman Democrat?”
The post says Brazile “allowed, however, that Lamont’s challenge was good for the party because he had ignited a “healthy debate.” LOL!
So I think we can infer from this that a “Lieberman Democrat” is somebody who’s happy to have Joe as a new client. You know her exceptionally perceptive advice has got to be pretty spendy, and I really doubt the Lamont campaign would be interested. A consultant’s gotta do what a consultant’s gotta do.
Atlas Shrugged is horrifying. I keep waiting for her to go check in her crockpot to see if the rabbit is ready.
-GSD
Jane @88, don’t forget about our friends at the NSA
Atlas Shrugged is horrifying. I keep waiting for her to go check in her crockpot to see if the rabbit is ready.
After watching her (shudder) singing and dancing, I can’t think of the last time I saw anyone so utterly deluded about their own appeal. Among other things.
If you look at the Coulter picture and think “foot”- then it all makes sense- the woman has four feet!
I wish those damn Iraqis would stop talking down the situation.
(Snip)
“Presidential security adviser Wafiq al-Samaraie told Al-Jazeera television that “we are at the gates of civil war” unless “exceptional measures” are taken.”
Everyone clap your hands and say “happy purple fingered people” five times fast.
-GSD
If you look at the Coulter picture and think “foot”- then it all makes sense- the woman has four feet!
So all the transgender jokes were way off - she’s actually trans-species.
Everyone clap your hands and say “happy purple fingered people” five times fast.
Shiny purple fingers holding hands…
5 Fox TV Affiliates Display “Secret” Swift Monitoring Info For 5 Years!
I thought that it was odd that my “find” was undiscovered everywhere else that I checked. As an unexpected dividend, I was able to use what I found to destroy the argument of John Hinderaker that “only liberals” and “not terrorists” searched the internet for the 2002 UN report that described the government’s “secret” SWIFT monitoring program. Hinderaker posted that the SWIFT details contained in the 2002 UN report paragraph #31, did not put the SWIFT program in the public domain….he asserted that would require larger exposure…something bigger, maybe that the fact is that the SWIFT program details have been available for public viewing on 5 Fox TV affiliates websites for the past 58 months..would be enough to shatter Hinderaker’s stealth attack on the NY Times….
Is it true that the “Lieberman Democrat” is fast becoming an endangered feces?
As long as the Iraq situation doesn’t deteriorate into an incivil war, the rightosphere will think everything’s peachy.
Jane #88: did you read the comments at that blog? Hysterical!
Eli
Well, mentally perhaps, she obviously hasn’t completed the surgery.
GW Clusterfuck can always take refuge in the fact that during his watch Iraqis became partly purple.
Infortunately for most Iraqis they are turning purple from lavidity.
-GSD
What the fuck is a “Lieberman Democrat?”
Another term meaning bait and switch.
A large gray tick on the party.
A newspaper with a subcription for one.
The latest model of Pet Rock.
What kids say before they pour salt on a snail.
It’s like a mankini wedgie.
Political Zidanizm
given the death count in GW Clusterfuck’s war- he’s a purple people eater.
given the death count in GW Clusterfuck’s war- he’s a purple people eater.
Violets beget violets.
Louisiana has passed a law making internet hunting illegal. You can no longer go online and shoot things and have the carcasses sent to you.
The corporation who had been thoughtfully offering the service to the home bound- and just plain lazy-now plans to offer internet warfare- whereby for a certain price- you can off Iraqis from your easy chair and have the remains stuffed and mounted.
Anne Coulter- a viscious human trapped in a weasel’s body.
The corporation who had been thoughtfully offering the service to the home bound- and just plain lazy-now plans to offer internet warfare- whereby for a certain price- you can off Iraqis from your easy chair and have the remains stuffed and mounted.
This is kind of like Republican Iraq policy in a nutshell…
For a somewhat higher fee, internet customers can take control of a drone aircraft and drop 500 pound bombs on houses said to contain “terrorists”. In this scenario, however, customers are not assured that their trophies will be stuffable.
In this scenario, however, customers are not assured that their trophies will be stuffable.
They can get framed poster-size photos, though…
I must have missed the “manpris” thing, I had no idea what it was about … is this:
http://blogs.bakersfield.com/d.....npris.html
the subject under derision? This is capri pants for men?
GW Clusterfuck welcomed the new internet warfare as a good american piece of ingenuity and a coup for the free enterprise system.
“It’s about time americans got the opportunity to experience first hand the things our troops experience daily” said enterprising president.
Internet “Rape and Iraqi” is in the planning stages— and “torture an Iraqi” will be available soon.
Oh yes, AirportCat.
Whatever you do, do not attempt to find out anything about mankinis. You will be scarred for life.
rwcole @109, FWIW: eagles may soar, but weasels never get sucked into jet engines.
Eli @115, thanks for the warning! (busily re-setting filters on browser to block all mention of “manpris” and “mankinis” …)
No problem AC. It’s just a service I provide.
praying mantis
playing manpris
any dude who wears those probably deserves to have his head removed by his mate.
manpris - gateway garment to untold fashion horrors
New Clusterfuck international policy on North Korea—”No- YOU stop him!”
punaise @119, “… last seen in the company of Ann Coulter, wearing a pair of ochre manpris …”
Thanks, Roger, for this highlights reel. Tell me, though, how pained were you to miss Mrs. Greenspan for the tennis?
I’ve gotta say BushCo came up with a pretty one with that Nicholas Burns. Hellllllooooo, Mr. Ambassador!
punaise, not implying you as last seen in the company of … sorry if it came out looking that way …
Airport Cat 122 - I appreciate being mentioned outside the quotation marks!
Ann Coulter is a viscous weasel trapped in a humans skeleton.
-GSD
RWCole. Just how well is the new Bush policy of pointing the finger at France and saying “They agree with us!” going down with the wingers anyhow?