
The NYT is reporting that Joe Biden will bring his bleached teeth and hair transplants to Connecticut to campaign for Holy Joe (and that's the last I want to hear about "outside interference" from Camp Lieberman). He'll be joined by fellow Alito-lover Ken Salazar, and sadly, Barbara Boxer:
Their goal is to reassure the party faithful of the three-term senator's loyalty to Democratic causes, including women's issues, labor and the environment.
"It will be a reminder to voters of the work he's done on progressive issues," Lieberman spokeswoman Marion Steinfels said Wednesday. "Some of his colleagues wanted to come here and campaign for him on issues that matter to him and them."
If Boxer wants to come to Connecticut and spend some of her political capital on Rape Gurney Joe, she better bring a Brinks truck. Because the last time I encountered Barbara Boxer talking about Lieberman, she was sadly misinformed. It was during Yearly Kos, and she was saying that opposition to Joe was "all about the war" and that on women's issues, he was great.
The women of Connecticut don't think so. Before Boxer steps in the deep doo-doo Lieberman has created for himself with women in this state by his stance on Plan B and publicly funded Catholic hospitals, she might want to educate herself on his history. I'll quote the great Connecticut Bob here:
Lieberman said he believes hospitals that refuse to give contraceptives to rape victims for "principled reasons" shouldn’t be forced to do so.
"In Connecticut, it shouldn’t take more than a short ride to get to another hospital," he said.
Well Joe, that’s not very helpful. I mean, I know that you’ll never need emergency contraception at two o’clock in the morning after having been brutally raped. So I guess it’s easy for you to disregard any woman who is unlucky enough to have gone through that trauma.
I actually think this is great, because one of the big reasons I came to Connecticut was to counter the ridiculous notion that opposition to Lieberman was "all about the war." Boxer stumping for Lieberman and saying how wonderful he is on women's issues in a state where 78% of the population thinks that emergency contraception should be avaliable at Catholic hospitals (including 74% of Catholics) could be the perfect opportunity to telescope attention onto the issue. Although I'd much rather be hammering the folically-challenged Ken Salazar or Joe Biden, you work with what you have. (Lieberman has also supported those creepy anti-choice state license plates.)
I got a chance to meet State Rep. Denise Merrill last night, who took the bold step of trying to restrict funding for hospitals that did not offer emergency contraception to rape victims (it was finally stripped out by Speaker of the House James Amman, who by coincidence pledged his undying love for Rape Gurney Joe today, as well as his support for an indy cut-and-run bid in November). It was a bold move that brought the whole issue to a head, led to the creation of Connecticut Choice Voice (women supporting Ned and speaking out against Lieberman) and eventually resulted in the Connecticut heads of NARAL and Planned Parenthood bucking their national organizations and voting for Ned at the state convention.
It's sad that an 18 year veteran has to bring in out-of-state ringers to convince the people of Connecticut that he's worthy of the Democratic nomination (not that he cares anything about their opinion, mind you -- if they reject him, his own personal Plan B is "fuck 'em all").
Well I'm off to start calling the ladies of Connecticut Choice Voice, I'm sure they'll be there when Boxer shows up to ask a few pointed questions. And that will be me with the camcorder.
(graphic by Dark Black)
Update: Alice Marshall comes up with a new meaning for WATB: "Whining About The Blogosphere." That may have to take a permanent place under the official definition.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
I think Firedoglake should be renamed the All Lieberman All the Time Blog.
Jane we love you….You are awesome……Boxer has been great but her support of RapeGurneyJoe MUST be challenged…..She doesn’t know what the hell she is talking about on this topic, that is for sure.
OH……FITZ!
Joe Biden will bring his bleached teeth and hair transplants to Connecticut to campaign for Holy Joe
what happened to him bringing his baseball cap?
Shame on Babs for this.
“It will be a reminder to voters of the work he’s done on progressive issues,” Lieberman spokeswoman Marion Steinfels said Wednesday.
Should be a real short visit, then.
Joe Biden, consituency of one: MBNA,or whatever they’ve become.
Everybody hop on over to the C-Span debate between Lamont and that other guy.
Better yet, multitask. Somebody else’s turn to liveblog, my fingers are tired :)
I suspect that all three of them will offer lukewarm support at best. Biden usually has his fingers (and toes) to the wind, and he should quickly realize that supporting Jumping Joe today is going to cost him a lot of votes in the 2008 Presidential primaries. Boxer has to know that she’s not going to be able to say “Lieberman” and “pro-woman” in the same sentence and manage to keep a straight face. As for Ken “Who?” Salazar, is his “help” really going to help Joe all that much?
George says
July 5th, 2006 at 3:55 pm
I think Firedoglake should be renamed the All Lieberman All the Time Blog.
———————————————————-
Must…not…feed…troll.
Ok…. I’ve seen the acronym (sp) ‘WATB’ around the blogs in reference to Lieberman. What does it mean???
He’s like all the others - doing everything he can to remain in power….
I thought Boxer got schooled on this at YearlyKos? If so, then she’s disingenous and just off the reservation (or is that “on it” in our current DCCC & DLC metaphor?)
Jane, do you think e-Faxes, emails & letters to Boxer, Biden & Salazar voicing our opposition in their support of Leiberman?
Can site the facts about Leiberman’s failure to support womens issues and the local support of Now & NARAL…
Those of us out here in the left side of America want to help (besides money). What can we do to help the cause?
Blast. The debate is TOMORROW at 7. All day long I’ve been convinced it’s Thursday.
Jane - A commenter at Gilliard’s place suggested you were going Hunter S. Thompson on us! LOL
I can’t wait to see the video with Boxer.
I think Boxer has some kind of crush on Joe. It’s the only explanation I can think of.
Any women out there who can explain his Svengali-esque sex appeal to me?
Eli says
July 5th, 2006 at 4:00 pm
“It will be a reminder to voters of the work he’s done on progressive issues,” Lieberman spokeswoman Marion Steinfels said Wednesday.
Should be a real short visit, then.
———————————————————-
Do you think they’ll even bother to land the plane?
If you took the best of Boxer and the best of Hillary, and tossed the rest, you’d have one helluva fantastic candidate for anything. As it is, both leave a not so good taste…
Ok…. I’ve seen the acronym (sp) ‘WATB’ around the blogs in reference to Lieberman. What does it mean???
Whiney-Ass Titty Baby.
iowa christine says
July 5th, 2006 at 4:02 pm
Ok…. I’ve seen the acronym (sp) ‘WATB’ around the blogs in reference to Lieberman. What does it mean???
He’s like all the others - doing everything he can to remain in power….
———————————————————-
Whiny Ass Titty Baby
egregious I think that’s tomorrow, but thanks for being on alert ;)
My Senator (I have disavowed Diane F), Barbara Boxer, sent me an e-mail last week asking for support for Maria Cantwell. Haven’t yet received a missive from her asking for support for Lieberman. Maybe he has called in some chips and she feels she just has to go. You have my permission, Jane, to let Boxer know that this California voter does NOT approve of Joe’s stance on women’s issues. Plus, I will e-mail her.
Do you think they’ll even bother to land the plane?
Ooo, maybe they could fly a skywriter! Really, a sentence or two is probably all they’d be able to manage anyway.
Petro @ 11
Whinny ass titty baby…. WATB… LOVE it!
I suppose the good news out about this is that it will effectively end any chance Joe Biden had of becoming the Democratic nominee for President in 08′. It won’t keep him from fundraising millions of course and I’m sure he’d still trample over a room full of children to get in front of a camera on the other side. But at least I don’t have to worry about true democrats ever really taking him seriously as a candidate anymore.
As for Barbara Boxer… That’s just plain sad. Don’t any of these idiots have staff that are willing to warn them against trying to polish the brass on the titanic? Oh wait, It’s all good!
After all… The band is still playing!
Any women out there who can explain his Svengali-esque sex appeal to me?
BLAH! [Snoopy style] No appeal here, sorry Eli can help you.
Nate:
He had as much chance as I do, anyway.
BLAH! [Snoopy style] No appeal here, sorry Eli can help you.
You don’t swoon at his crinkly, twinkly smile? Or his calm, soothing voice? Or his… umm…
I got nothin’.
Whiny Ass Titty Baby
Typing that is so FUN.
Jane, if I may speak for the Democrats from the Great State of Colorado:
Sen. Salazar, there’s a difference between striking a moderate path, due to one’s lack of seniority and inexperience, and being a benighted, short-sighted fool for the goals of men whose only good to the Democratic Party is through their seniority.
In short: Going along to get along isn’t always the smartest idea. As I and many others will tell you, in the upcoming days.
Biden gives “unctuous” a bad name.
Big disappointment to hear Boxer is going to stump for Joe. She is usually on the right side of an issue. I can see supporting him verbally, since they’re in the sitting senator’s club, but to CAMPAIGN for him? Looks like we Californians need to remind her gently about why we hate Joe.
Great post, as per usual Jane.
I am just going to offer this. Is it possible for us to ask Boxer, Salazaar,and Biden not to support Joe until he ditches “Plan B,” and commits to supporting the winner of the primary?
This gives the three an “out?”
I support Ned, but I will be emailing all three and absent any other suggestions, this will be the gist of what I say.
It’s critical imo to stop these three. If we don’t Schumur may be next followed by more.
Jane:
Liberman is a Rat, an enemy of the constitution, and the fact that one of my congressional representitives is showing up to support this Republican is shameful, and I just got off the phone with her office and told them so. There is something going on here, what I don’t know, but it is not politics as usual, it is something much more sinister…..and if the Democrats can’t put their house in order, we’re all in deep trouble. If Lieberman does not plan to leave the Senate if he is not elected, he should be dragged off the floor by the capitol police. As Trex said last night, we do not have a house of Lords.
Big disappointment to hear Boxer is going to stump for Joe. She is usually on the right side of an issue. I can see supporting him verbally, since they’re in the sitting senator’s club, but to CAMPAIGN for him?
It seems completely out of character. DiFi I could understand.
Egregious, I thought it was Thursday too, and was baffled to find news about the Shuttle (interesting) and something Book TV’ish (not nearly so interesting). I think we’re just anticipating the “The Smiting of Holy Joe” that Ned will administer.
Biden puts the smarm in smarmalade.
Department of Ooopsie: sorry about the debate thing…I just FEEL like it’s Thursday. Our administration runs on feelings, shouldn’t we?
Any women out there who can explain his Svengali-esque sex appeal to me? As a female I can tell you I am mystified.
The only shred I can come up with is that he seems confident. Of course in this case he is confident and WRONG => wanker.
I still canNOT believe that the DSCC and Boxer!–how very disappointing! would support a candidate running AGAINST the winner of the Democratic primary. Ugh a bug.
Eclaire @ 22…
I am in complete agreement with you on this issue. I will be emailing Senator Boxer in order to share with her my profound disappointment with her choice. How can she support a man who feels the way he does about rape victims? A man who may not even share Senator Boxer’s party affiliation a month from now?
It just ain’t right!
Pach- He had as much chance as I do, anyway.
What worries me about that pach is that I’d vote for you! :)
The more time that tanning-booth Biden spends in front of the camera, the more support he siphons from true progressives. I’d rather see him laughed out of possibility publicly and early. I hope this expedites that process. Now I’m off to call Sen. Inouye’s staff and ask a friend to try and knock some sense into Babs’ staffers…
very disappointed to hear that about boxer. people in CA should be calling and emailing her. a lot.
Svengali-esque appeal???? From Lieberman??? You’re joking?? Right?? Now if we were talking about Harrison Ford, or similar, then we’d talk!!
Thanks for the definition!!
I wonder why he feels he has the *right* to retain his seat in the Senate? Just because you’ve held the seat for 3 terms doesn’t mean that you can have it for as long as you’d like. Maybe, he’s got a very nice off-shore account that gets padded every so often from the corporations and Republican Party??
Do we have any pull with any other Dems, who could write Boxer, Salazar, and Biden a public letter asking them to stay out of the CT primary, until HoJo commits to support the winner of the primary?
Does Hillary’s office have any suggestions?
She took the big step on July 4. She has to be royally and justifiably pissed at all three.
Aren’t all of these assclowns just a big club looking out to hold on to power. They see Lamont as an OUTSIDER.
Dear Senator Salazar –
You ran on the platform of defending Colorado’s Land, Water, People — last time I checked, those did not include George Bush’s favorite (watb) Democrat.
Swoon? Oh Eli,
I had friends over yesterday for a barbeque. The most interesting thing was said. Our friend who is registered Independent is now switching over to the Democrats so that he can vote for Ned Lamont in the primary.
Also, his son who is eligible to vote stated he would also be voting for Lamont and against Lieberman for one reason - the war.
“Maybe he has called in some chips and she feels she just has to go.”
That’s it in a nutshell–he’s calling in every chip, I.O.U. and photo with livestock he can. The sniveling, little turd’s feeling the ground shake under his feet and he’s scared as all hell.
Remember, he’s going to tthe mattresses here over a PRIMARY challenge.
The smell you’re catching in the air is that of raw fear, mingled with the briney tang of freshly-shed tears, and the earthy, sodden stink of crapped pants.
Such sweet perfume… :)
Any of these pro war dems need to recuse themselves from speaking anywhere until they admit their ENORMOUS error.
Salazar did not vote as he was not in the Senate. Biden voted yea. Lieberman voted yea. Boxer voted nay. She’s got some ’splainin to do.
I had friends over yesterday for a barbeque. The most interesting thing was said. Our friend who is registered Independent is now switching over to the Democrats so that he can vote for Ned Lamont in the primary.
I’m pretty sure Republicans are the only ones who really like Joe. He’s one of them, after all.
Jane,
Many people called or e-mailed sen. Boxer after her YKOS questions about our concerns with Ho,Jo. She has our answers. Why is she continuing to support this preposterous war on womens health? I cannot wait for your video question! Thank you.
EPU’d (so what else is new) from previous thread:
Shoogarp — Your Animal Planet update, strangely a propos: Now showing, Most Extreme, with an episode entitled “Cheats.” All about animals that use deception for hunting and reproduction strategies. The synopsis doesn’t say whether the program will also cover animals running for office pretending to be Democrats. However, the featured critter is an alligator snapping turtle, noted for luring its prey by the fraudulent color at the end of its tongue, and that sure sounds like someone we know.
Video of the KISS BWAAHHAHAHAHAHA
EPU’d again!
I called Boxer’s Sacramento office. The nice person there said they are keeping track of the opinions on Lieberman.
smarm in smarmalade!!!!! lol punaise!!!
Video of the KISS BWAAHHAHAHAHAHA
Maybe *after* dinner…
FDL Friends,
Spoke with Boxer aid at her LA office about joe the schmo. She said Boxer hasn’t decided what she’ll do when Ned wins the primary. Will Boxer still support joe. I asked isn’t it as simple as the voters choice? She said yes, but there were other concerns. I said for the voters it was a lot like crime, were against it and we have long memories.
Question: Does WATB stand for “what a total baby?”
I called Boxer’s Sacramento office. The nice person there said they are keeping track of the opinions on Lieberman.
That’s nice. Do they plan on actually *acting* on them?
Keep up the good work Jane.
Question: Does WATB stand for “what a total baby?”
Whiny-Ass Titty Baby.
tithonia 54 - thanks, spread it around
OT: CSPAN2 notes that the North Koreans conducted another missile test today. It sure looks like they’re trying to get someone’s attention, doesn’t it?
There’s a news conference on this issue next on CSPAN2.
Hey Linda,
Just read thru the last thread … they have tv’s at the Streets of London Pub … they watch football there (soccer to us ‘Mericans) ;)
The new fragrance by neoconLauder “Lieberman”
Hints of raw fear, mingled with the briney tang of freshly-shed tears, and the earthy, sodden stink of crapped pants.
Available at fine cosmetics counters near you…
I too am very disappointed in Boxer, my former Senator. DiFi, yes, I could see her supporting Joementum, but Boxer?? Urgh. I can’t wait to vote for Ned now that I’m back in CT!!
Jane, Christy, Trex, love all the posts. You guys rock!
Joe:
Have you heard of (former) City of St. Paul Mayor Randy Kelly? Welcome to private industry. I’m sure you’ll be fine. A kiss is just a kiss, eh?
Paul Miller
Northfield, MN
Just got off the phone with Barbara Boxer’s office in San Francisco where it was confirmed to me that she is going to campaign for Leiberman before the primary!
I told the man I was speaking to that I am usually a big supporter of Senator Boxer but that she was making a HUGE mistake to not only go against the women of Connecticut but to disregard the State Democratic Convention votes of CT Planned Parenthood and CT NARAL. I told him that Boxer should make sure she is aware of all of Leiberman’s positions regarding woman’s issues, including his wrong Alito vote, before she gets on a plane to Connecitcut. I also told him she aught to listen to what Ned Lamont has to say on all the important issues this country faces as he is a true Democrat ,and he is definitely going to win the Democratic primary, and she will end up on the losing side.
He said he would pass my concerns on to the Senator…..
The good thing about Lieberman is that he is forcing out all of the rest of his Gopdem sleeper cells out of hiding.
Could you share Boxer’s office phone number? (Apologies if it’s upthread somewhere and I missed it.)
LowerManhattanite@47
The smell you’re catching in the air is that of raw fear, mingled with the briney tang of freshly-shed tears, and the earthy, sodden stink of crapped pants.
Well, that’s one way to put it, I guess. :)
Thanks for the Animal Planet update BarbaraB!
Could you see if Modern Marvels is on the National Geographic channel?
“Next on Modern Marvels a Democrat running as a Democrat AND an Independent AT THE SAME TIME!”
Eli 16 — that’s disgusting.
“Next on Modern Marvels a Democrat running as a Democrat AND an Independent AT THE SAME TIME!”
I think I found a pic.
Eli 16 — that’s disgusting.
*shrug*
It’s what I do. Anyway, how else can you explain one of the most reliably progressive senators (and from the bluest of blue states) going all the way across the country to stump for a Republican?
WATB= Whining about the blogosphere
Terrifying, actually.
Rape Gurney Joe has all the appeal of squashed pit bull.
Barbara doesn’t get too many things wrong - but she does have to put up with DiFi being the senior Senator from my state, so excuse her on this one.
Biden:
DC office: 202-224-5042
Wilmington office: 302-573-6345
Milford office: 302-424-8090
Boxer
DC office: (202) 224-3553
Sacramento office: (916) 448-2787
San Francisco office: (415) 403-0100
Los Angeles office: (213) 894-5000
Fresno office: (559) 497-5109
San Diego office: (619) 239-3884
Inland Empire office: (909) 888-8525
Salazar
DC office: (202) 224-5852
Denver office: (303) 455-7600
Colorado Springs office: (719) 328-1100
Fort Collins office: 970-224-2200
Ft Morgan office: 970-542-9446
Pueblo office: 719 542-7550
Four Corners office: (970) 259-1710
Western Slope office: 970-241-6631
Alamosa office: 719-587-0096
OT: News Conference on NK missiles. Japanese ambassardor to UN calls this “far more serious” than previous acts. SC met this morning about the issue at Japan’s urging. Japan urged that a resolution be drawn up. No details given. Apparently, that’s what the afternoon meeting will be about.
U.K. ambassador wants a “united council” and a “strong response”.
Bolton says that “no member” offered support for NK actions. Asked about how China might react, Bolton says we must “proceed carefully”. Needless to say, I’m fascinated to know what passes for “carefully” in John Bolton’s world.
Bolton says that this display’s Bush’s wisdom in abrogating the ABM treaty. Didn’t say what exactly we’d be doing in regard to defending Japan.
Just reheard Hardballs and Scheuer says on one hand that w. didn’t know about the dissolution of alec, but the tall one hand picked Zarqawi’s successor. Acc to him, nothing happens without the tall one’s direction.
uh, is there a disconnect here?
“Anyway, how else can you explain one of the most reliably progressive senators (and from the bluest of blue states) going all the way across the country to stump for a Republican? “
She’s no longer reliable.
Hi everyone–
daily lurker/occasional commenter here….
Just a quick thanks to Jane for keeping us updated w/all things Lamont v. Lieberman; when I read at Kos that my senator Boxer was stumping for Rape Gurny Joe my jaw hit the floor.
Has Boxer learned nothing since YKos?! sheesh.
Thanks Jane for contacting the CT Women’s groups and being there when Babs blabs.
Go Ned!
Anybody else wondering if Kennyboy is alive in another country?
just call 1-800-426-8073 to be connected to the Capitol Switchboard and ask to be connected to the senator
Asked about how China might react, Bolton says we must “proceed carefully”. Needless to say, I’m fascinated to know what passes for “carefully” in John Bolton’s world.
I think it means you don’t throw staplers at their ambassador.
California Senator’s and Representative’s contact info.
www.visi.com/juan/congress/cgi.....p;state=ca
She’s no longer reliable.
We’ll see if her voting record changes. We may need to perform a DNA test and/or exorcism.
Eli #73
LOL!
Jane, you gotta use Eli’s pic for a post!
John in Sacramento — thanks! I will be there.
:sheesh: I should have read further before asking the WATB question . . .
Over at shakespeares sister there is a most hysterical pic of bush looking extremely miserable. Caption under it is: President Poopypants.
not that i don’t think bush & co are anything other than incompetent, lying, self concerned, theiving, morons, but- it may be heretical, but i can’t get all worked up about NK and their rather pathetic missles. NK seems to be the one nation everyone can agree to keep contained, the one issue that china and japan can agree on, for christ’s sake.
sure, i’d like to see regime change and peace in the region, but lobbing a couple of rusty hulks into the sea of japan or whatever- not so scary.
OT: (UN news conference on NK missiles, cont.)
Russian ambassador: No “punitive measures” have been proposed, nor does he expect any.
Barbara Boxer in San Francisco: (415) 403-0100
Barbara Boxer in Washington: (202) 224-3553
Alice Marshall 75 — I think you’ve got the new definition there.
ccmask #83:
Is this really you?
http://kenlaylives.blogspot.co.....death.html
If so, it’s the most subtle blogwhore I’ve ever seen!
it may be heretical, but i can’t get all worked up about NK and their rather pathetic missles.
I’m with ya on this. Even if they were fine and effective missiles, Kim is still not crazy enough to launch anything with a return address. They’re porcupine quills: a deterrent, not a threat.
Now, nuclear *warheads* in the hands of a cash-strapped lunatic, that *does* concern me a bit…
Ken Lay was the fifth Beatle. Ken-Ken-kachoo.
Ken Lay was the fifth Beatle. Ken-Ken-kachoo.
Kenny Lay is in my ears and in my eyes…
eli- you mean like in pakistan? oh, wait…they’re on our team. never mind.
Why, in the name of all that’s good and holy, do we have even ASK dorkwads like Schumer and Boxer and Botox Biden if they will support the senate nominee elected by the people of Connecticut? They shouldn’t even have to think about it. When you ask, “hey, will you support the primary winner,” you should be met with an incredulous stare, and an immediate “of course!”
I think the source of their fear is that this strikes at the heart of the whole meta-narrative by which the party apparatus operates–the whole triangulate, find-the-mushy center, don’t-look-liberal, court-the-swing vote strategy.`If that meta-narrative is true, a decentralized, energized progressive base cannot beat an incumbent senator in A PRIMARY.
Just called Boxer’s LA office after getting a busy signal twice at the DC office. Thanks for the numbers!
eli- you mean like in pakistan? oh, wait…they’re on our team. never mind.
I’m not so worried about *Musharraf*, but I don’t know how long he’s going to stay in power…
thanks for the Boxer contact info john from sacramento. i’m in sacramento too. hi neighbor!
I just finished the Crazy Doings thread and I’m dizzy. Interesting links BarbB - thank you.
Re: Rumsfeld getting a subpeona - should be interesting. That is in connection with the young whistleblower (or at least he looked awful young to me) Provenance (sp?) and it could be interesting. The things he said in the hearing I watched on c-span seemed to make it crystal clear that Sanchez would have HAD to know most of what was going on at Abu Ghraib. He mentioned a huge board - BIG - with techniques listed on it, in the room where Sanchez would have had to walk through. I’m trying to remember what he said, to, about the board and the IRC inspections - I can’t remember though. He also talked about the use of children to make parents talk.
The IG brigade there testifying were infuriatingly blase about the punishments meted out on the whisleblowers and also on the conduct that they reported.
So will Rumsfeld comply with the subpoena? Will it be a good faith compliance? Will DOJ decide that he can lie to the committee just like the President could lie to Americans and it is all just fine - exec power stuff.
Truth or No Consequences.
Interesting times.
Eli #102:
It’s the replacement players who worry me. Benazir Bhutto’s very smart and very sane, but I somehow don’t think she’ll be getting the nod.
IN FOR A PENNY, IN FOR A POUND
Boxer, Salazar, and Biden are all campaigning for someone who will NOT commit to support the winner of the Democratic primary in CT.
Boxer, Salazar,and Biden are essentially supporting Joe AFTER he has declared the Dem primary in CT a complete waste of Democratic resources.
Perhaps we should be calling the CA, DE, and CO Democratic parties to explain exactly how dangerous this is to the National Democratic party. If HoJo can get away with it, why not every other incumbent? If the Democratic primary doesn’t mean anything, the Democratic Party does not exist. Without a binding primary, the “will of registered Democrats” has no impact on the Democratic party.
Eli 71 — What a great poster! All it needs is some Darkblack magic to either have two Lieberman heads (one blue, one red) or one Lieberman and one Bush. As for Boxer, folks, if she didn’t get it before, she will now. Best guess is that she won’t cancel, but she’ll fly in quietly, attend a fundraiser, and fly out. Sort of like Cheney does when a candidate wants the money but doesn’t want to be seen in public with him, only in reverse.
Called Boxer’s LA office as well. I asked the staffer to have Boxer NOT campaign for Joe based on war, republicking, Plan B, etc.
She asked me if I was a constituent from CA, which is no. So I ask: “How does that matter when a Senator from one state is meddling in the primary of another state?” Seems to be an issue of national Dem import when a Senator is trying to undermine a primary election.
{{{boggling my mind}}}
Oh Eli, I wouldn’t worry about Musharef. It’s not like Pakistan has ever had a military coup, or anything…oh, wait..never mind. Well, I’m sure the kind of coup Musharef staged against the elected government in Pakistan could never happen again.
It’s the replacement players who worry me. Benazir Bhutto’s very smart and very sane, but I somehow don’t think she’ll be getting the nod.
I was thinking more along the lines of Mullah Omar, actually…
chicago dyke @ 4:38 pm (#91) - I’m not a rocket scientist, but I am an engineer. Experience tells me that it’s unlikely that these “tests” have anything to do with validating or checking missile designs. Usually, tests like that are done singly and the data are then evaluated over a fairly long period (days surely, more likely weeks). If some problem is discovered, it will usually be corrected before the next test.
In short, you don’t just fire off a bunch of missiles at once if you want to get any value from the tests.
Whatever this is, in all likelihood it’s a political statement by the north Koreans. What that may be I leave up to your imaginations, but we all know there are quite a few possible motivations.
Sheehan says she would rather live under Chavez of Venezuela than Bush. Her heart may be in the right place. But I don’t know if her head is. I hate to give the fascists ammunition like this.
the local paper “the new london day” has a poll question. “If Lieberman loses in the Democratic primary should he run for Senate as an Independent?” i don’t want to freep the poll so i can see how the neighbors think. currently answering no is more than 2-1 (104 yes and 226 no)
Capitola 103
… i’m in sacramento too.
damn global warming. Capitola used to be near Santa Cruz, on the Pacific Ocean. or maybe it was the earthquake.
I have on occasion wondered if the reason why Bush is spying on EVERYTHING and Congress is letting him do it, is because there are nukes floating around there right now.
Of course if that was the case we would be inspecting all of the cargo containers coming into the country. Right?
Eli #110:
Me, too. And whatever happened to A.Q Khan, the glow-in-the-dark salesman extraordinnaire?
punaise, a very Aptos comment!
shows you which of the politicians (ticks, plain and simple, see blood, see suck) are beyond party politics and are simply corrupt and offensive. The demos would rather have joe than someone that beats him in the democratic primary?
we have met the enemy and it is us
al-Scoot: Soquel it what it what you will…
Situation Room just went to break talking about Hillary and Joe when they get back from commercial. Quote: “…sounding more like a presidential candidate and find out why an old ally might be on the losing end of that” with a split screen picture of her and Rape Gurney Joe.
cujo- all of which make me say “yawn” even more over these “tests.” a cry for attention: yes. a reason for me to worry…not so much.
Dear Sen. Boxer,
I have been a supporter of yours since you represented my district in the House. I have generally supported your positions on things but the news that you will be supporting Sen Lieberman in the CT primary is hugely disappointing.
1. Joe Lieberman is a DINO, and has voted for Bush and the Rs when it most counted (cf. the Alito cloture vote).
2. He is opposed by a qualifed and apparently electable candidate in the CT primary, who as a complete unknown, received 33% of the delegates’ vote in the CT Dem Convention.
3. He has stated that if he loses the primary he will run as an independent, thus threatening the electability of the Democratic candidate and putting his interest ahead of the Dem party and the Dem voters of his home state.
Why are you doing this? Why is any incumbent Senator (including Sen Biden) doing this? As a matter of stri