
This is an appropriate story for the 4th of July. You remember all of those rights we fought over 230 years ago, like freedom of speech and freedom of assembly? Well, you can still take advantage of them – until you walk through the workplace door – unless you’re protected by a union. This is a story for all of those who think that 21st century American workers don’t need unions.
What do we do with teachers who win “laudatory evaluations and recommendations from their principal, from their school’s director of instruction and from their school’s director of special needs and academic support, who win lavish reviews from hard-to-win-over students, and whose classes are showcased by Chancellor of Schools? Well, if they ask some reasonable, but uncomfortable questions about their salary and the fate of their 401(k) contributions, you fire their asses --if they're not protected by a union.
That’s what happened to Nichole Byrne Lau who taught English for the last two years at the Williamsburg Charter High School in Brooklyn. Nichole’s crime? According to the United Federation of Teachers’ blog Edwize:
Nichole shared with other teachers in the school the salary schedule for teachers in the New York City Department of Education. Although teachers at Williamsburg had many more teaching contact hours, and far less preparation time, than NYC school teachers, they found that they earned considerably less than their public school counterparts. Nichole reached out to the UFT, through this blog, asking what her rights were and how she might secure them. She and a second teacher asked Eddie Calderon-Melendez, the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Williamsburg Charter High School, how salaries were set, and if there was a schedule for the school. A third teacher began to ask questions about why the quarterly reports of teachers’ 401-K plans did not show that the school was depositing the funds that were part of their remuneration for their work.
Calderon-Melendez hauled Lau into his office and told her that she was being fired. Another teacher who had asked uncomfortable questions was also fired. When Lau asked Calderon-Melendez for a reason,
He replied that he did not have to give her a reason, as she was an “at will” employee who could be let go for any reason whatsoever. He did allow, however, that it had nothing to do with her teaching. [Charter school management who oppose unionization often argue “at will” employment is essential for ensuring the quality of their teaching staff.] “I was devastated,” Nichole says.
Calderon-Melendez may not have given Lau a reason for being fired, but when questioned by the press, he responded that "She hates children. She's a racist." (Which makes Lau even more of a teaching genius -- getting children to like you so much when you hate them.)
Charter schools in New York are supervised by the state and receive public financing, but are run by outside groups. Under state law, new small charter schools are not bound by teachers' union contracts. To unionize, charter teachers must go through a multistep process and a formal vote, according to the NY Times. Only eight of the 47 New York charter schools – including an elementary school operated by UFT -- operate under union contracts.
The UFT took up Nichole’s cause. UFT President Randi Weingarten wrote a letter to Calderon-Melendez saying “I am appalled by what you have done and will do everything in my power to both publicize and right this wrong.” She also wrote to New York City Schools Chancellor Joel Klein, asking him to “join with us and use your considerable power to ensure that good teachers are not retaliated against in their quest to have a voice in the school environments.”
What we have here is a combination of non-union workers’ helplessness in the face of the arbitrary actions of dictatorial bosses who tolerate no challenge from their employees, combined with the right-wings tendency to blame the ills of our education system on teachers, or more specifically on the unions that represent teachers. The anti-union National Right To Work Foundation has formed a special organization to oppose teachers’ unions:
Like many government-sector professions, public education has long been dominated by compulsory unionism. To combat the serious threat to academic freedom that compulsory unionism poses, Concerned Educators Against Forced Unionism (CEAFU) was founded in 1975. As a special project of the National Right to Work Legal Foundation, CEAFU has been at the forefront in the battle against forced unionism in public education for 30 years. It is continuing to educate America's teachers about the coercive agenda of the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers' union hierarchies.
California Governor Schwarzenegger has put together his “Education Coalition,” and packed it full of right-wing, anti-union members. And the AFL-CIO Now reports that New York Governor Pataki, Mayor Michael Bloomberg and others are trying to make it nearly impossible for the union to sign up members at charter schools
But New York is not the only place that charter schools have been used to attack teachers’ unions. Earlier this year, 7500 New Orleans teachers were fired, and all but four of the schools still exist in the city were transformed into charter schools which are exempt from union rules. The New Orleans Times Picayune describes how the non-union system is supposed to work.
Like private and religious schools throughout the area, the charter schools operate without negotiated contracts. They hire teachers for a year at a time, keeping those who perform well and letting go of those who don't.
Of course, as New York’s Nichole Byrne Lau has learned, “performance” may be about much more than just teaching.
Nichole’s story has a happy ending. She was quickly hired at Brooklyn Tech, one of New York City’s very best public high schools. The teacher fired along with her was also quickly hired at another school. But the lesson has been learned. Nichole says “I will never again work in a school where I don’t belong to a union.”
So, as you roast the dogs, watch the fireworks and listen to patriotic speeches tonight, just remember that the civil rights that many of us take for granted must be aggressively defended where they still exist, and fought for when they don't. Despite all of the trash talk about how unions price organizations out of existence and stifle them in bureaucracy, at their core unions are really about dignity and human rights -- inside and outside the workplace.
UPDATE: Adrianne Shropshire at the DMI Blog offers the perspective of a parent looking for Kindergarten for her daughter:
Charter schools operate within an industry where standards for teacher compensation have been set by employers and unions, thus creating a "high road" approach for working conditions in this sector. When charter schools opt out of this approach they become no different than low road employers in any other industry.
The mission statement for Williamsburg Charter High School says that "Fairness, justice, respect and compassion..." are what the school is about. Asking teachers to impart these noble values to our children while they are denied them by the school administration, smacks of deep hypocrisy. Saying one thing while doing the opposite is not the lesson I want my children learn.
Jordan Barab blogs at Confined Space.
Login Here
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


RSS/XML Feed
Fitz!
Fitz?
Dang, just missed the trifecta…
Fitz, whose hard-working father belonged to a union!
OT: CNN is turning into all-Korea, all-the-time … fascinating !
Jordan, you rock. This is such a great series you’re doing here. My dad was a public schoolteacher, and I know a lot of teachers. I’ll spare you all my rant about how undervalued and undercompensated teachers are. But imagine how much worse off they’d be without unions.
Evening. Quite a day while I hung out at the grill! Now, on this article…what exactly are Charter Schools? They receive some public financing? But do the students also pay tuition? And why do these type schools even exist if the gov’t body creates and fully funds Public Schools? Seems like the gov’t body ought to spend all its money on its 100% public schools, and let these charter schools fend for their own.
Ghostman
I teach in a public school in a rural, agricultural region, in one of the un-richest areas of one of the un-richest states. And my state is a so called “right to work state”. Which is code for being virulently anti-union. But I am one of the “richest” people on the planet. And I wouldn’t trade what I do for anything. I suppose I am one of the lucky few, who loves their work. And here I’ll stay… as long as I’m needed.
Charter schools are what the right has come up with to destroy public education.In theory,they can act as testing areas to try new ideas,and improve childhood education.in reality they usually end up 1.religious2.private[and expensive]The main difference that I see is they try to suck money from the public ed. funds
snuffy: Charter schools are what the right has come up with to destroy public education.
Exactly. Don’t they understand what would do to our country?
Wingnuts like to say that liberals want to “throw money” at education. If we want to improve the public schools we’re going to have to pay for it, and it’s well worth it.
OT-slightly. The huge slide in the # of union workers of all sorts in this country is one of the main reasons the DEMS slid nationally. Unions were not only key to giving people livable salaries and benefits but also to getting out the vote for democratic candidates. The DNC has done zip on this.
A very, very important issue, Jordan,
So where is the 401K $ going? To Lieberman’s campaign. To Libby’s defense fund. To hire non-union goons to go after the Guv of NJ? Probably all those things or worse…
No one believed, after Brown v. Board of Education that the protestant right in this country would oppose integration when it meant the end of quality public education in this country. But that is what happened. With class mixing, there was still the ability to claim a priveleged version of noblesse oblise. But once the race/class mixture became inevitable, the racist white middle and upper classes have been working out how to toss quality public education based on equal opportunity ever since.
As a teacher, I can tell you that the fix is in and it is a very large sea to swim in. First, there is the maintenance of privelege — both class and race based. Then, there is the maintenance of wealth which flows from that privelege. In its purest form, the elimination of the estate tax is just part of the aristocraticization of the United States.
Thank you again and again, Jordan, and Happy Fourth of July!
Read this post and one below almost simultaneously and came up with the thought that this post is representative of why it’s so damn important to get Americans who don’t vote involved. There’s alot of hard work to be done and the sidelines are no longer a subburb of the City of Denial.
Even my Fox News-watching middle school teacher mom is a member of a teachers’ union. She may be willfully ignorant, but she’s not stupid.
Jordan, thank you for this series. We seem to be forgetting, as a society, why we have unions in the first place. And we’re going there, again.
I heard an interview somewhere on Air America about a medical group (rather large, IIRC) who joined the Teamsters to get more leverage with the *nsurance companies, whom they accused of practicing medicine without a license. It worked, too.
Are you seeing any other creative ways to modernize union participation?
Yes Jordan you DO rock.
This whole situation is just chock full of right wing anti-education canards. And no wonder Schwarzennegger is stacking everything with anti-union people — weren’t the unions the ones that trashed all this absurd ballot initiatives in the last election?
Yet another reason to support unions.
Oh and excellent snark, Jordan. Happy 4th.
Well, if you don’t throw money at teacher salaries, and textbooks and supplies, you gonna have plenty of nuthin’. Which is the intent.
Any regular on this blog is constitutionally incapable of understanding the neocon mindset. The rightwingers are missing something vital, a brain chemistry or set of linkages that make it possible for empathy, and it is like color-blindness. They have no receptors, no generators for oxytocin, the great love potion in (most of) us. . . it it that simple? If you don’t know what I am talking about: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxytocin
Err, that would be “. . . Is it that simple?”
Well, I’m just not too familiar with this Charter School concept. But I know, as a taxpayer, if I learned that my tax money, paid to the school district, is going, in part, to fund a private school that ALSO collects tuition from students, I’d raise hell.
Maybe people aren’t too aware of how these charter schools work. Looks like the taxpayers are helping fund a corporation for its own profits.
Ghostman
The teachers I know teach because of the children. They do not do it because they are getting rich doing it, or because they love the controlling parents who think their children should get all A’s all the time, or because they love fighting all the nit-picky administrative baloney they put up with, or because they love the almost annual changes in the “approach” and methods and the rafts of standardized tests they have to administer.
I hate the idea of school vouchers. Am not sold on charter schools, either. Am tired of the argument that people who send their kids to private schools deserve something more because their tax dollars support the public schools that they are not using.
Public education benefits all of society, and that’s why you contribute tax dollars even if you don’t have children in the public school system - or in any system at all.
Yes, there are some pretty bad teachers out there, but the ones I know are dedicated and pretty damn good at what they do. Those teachers should be rewarded and compensated commensurate with the importance of education to society. No, teachers are not the revenue stream that ballplayers are, but if the children they educate go on to be truly productive and responsible members of society, their work is responsible, in some measure, for that result.
Less emphasis on administration, and more on quality teaching, would enable school systems to allocate more of those per-pupil costs to teaching itself, and not to salaries for a sytem that is top-heavy with administrators.
School-based administration also works well, allowing the administration and teaching staff to tailor the programs on the basis of the students they teach and the demands and needs of the area where the school is located.
Teachers need a voice, they need representation, and they need to be treated as the valuable members of the community that they are.
In one word: Duh. That’s what Charter schools are sposed to be like, to privatize pub ed, to minimize benefits, etc. Anyone who doesn’t know this going in to a Charter school system hasn’t done [her] … um, homework.
Meanwhile I checked with 2 minimum wage workers — a Blockbuster clerk and a Sherms cleark, and both told me they were getting time and a half today 7-4-06. (In OR with the $7.50 minimum wage. Thanks to liberalism.)
One of the best, if not the best, posts I have read here.
Thanks for the reminder.
Jordan, thanks for a thought-provoking post. We have to treat our teachers better, if we want the next generation to be educated properly.
Immanentize–OT: thanks, I just registered under the name ‘truly egregious’ :D
Jordan —
I’m not surprised to read that charter schools are constructing an anti-union framework. This isn’t all that’s wrong with charter schools; in San Francisco, we have seen standards lowered and public treasuries looted by public school administrators who endorse charter schools.
There is no excuse for abandoning our publicly financed public schools in favor of these voucher-supported “third way” charter schools, but school boards hire administrators who favor charter schools in order to keep the foundation and corporate money flowing.
Your posts dovetail well with the progressive agenda. Every time I read your work, I am reminded of that bumper sticker that says, “Enjoying Your Weekend? Thank the Union Movement!”
Happy Fourth, everyone. Really pleased to have enjoyed a very long photo-taking stroll in Golden Gate Park without knowing we were the possible target of North Korea’s missiles. Aren’t our Dear Leader and their Dear Leader a great argument for ending this legacy leadership lunacy that plagues our planet?
Increase the estate tax to 100% and start the meritocracy now, please….
=========
Had Enough?
=========
Was it Walter Reuther said: “If you have a boss, you need a union?”
regardless of the provenance, that’s the the truth of the matter…
egregious 24 HA! That is so much more YOU.
konopeli,
My wife is the boss here. Which union do you suggest?
We have to treat our teachers better, if we want the next generation to be educated properly.
who is this ‘we’ of whom you speak?
it is not the people who design the schools, or write the curriculum, of that i am sure.
the purpose of school in the US is to make as certain as is bureaucratically possible that no child shall escape the social class and labor niche into which s/he was born…
.
Every teacher I know of spends way too much money out of the meager paycheck they are granted to provide supplies for the ill-provisioned classrooms (I am in Florida). How demeaning it must be to beg parents and friends for used paper, pencil stubs, and the like because the school system does or can not provide for their clients. How totally that exposes our national hypocrisy about how we love children. Feh.
My wife is the boss here. Which union do you suggest?
try to get the strap-on away from her occasionally, for a start…
Jordan your posts are some of the best & most necessary stuff here. Thank you.
i’ll believe that throwing money at a problem is futile when the people with money refrain from throwing it at their problems…
Chater schools are about privatization. Outsourcing, if you will, public education to private operators. They are ostensibly (usually) non-profit and, as I understand it here in Florida, exempt from FCATs, those wonderful standardized tests that have eaten most of the curriculum. So there is no way of telling whether they are in fact doing better than the regular public schools, assuming that you define better by test scores. Privatization withut accountability — the Republican wet dream.
Yes, Jane, the teacher and nurse unions stopped Arnold in his tracks, and saved California from his dangerous ballot initiatives. Nurses dogged Arnold’s every public appearance — and the media loved it, their “sexy Terminator” called out by nurses at every stop. His poll numbers sunk into the low thirties.
This year, Arnold’s hired a Democratic chief of staff, lesbian Susan Kennedy, who is steering him to “the center” in his fight for re-election. Other Democrats on his and Maria’s staff are helping him “reach out” to the legislature. Dianne Feinstein tours the threatened levee system in Arnold’ helicopter, giving him more bi-partisan photo opportunities. Not surprisingly, Arnold’s ads started the day after the Democratic primary in June, and feature quotes from Phil Angelides’ opponent.
If Arnold gets re-elected, Californians will see another right turn, of course, despite all his talk about “listening to the voice of the people” after the initiatives went down to defeat last year.
Californians, don’t be fooled by Arnold’s election-year metamorphasis! Vote Phil!
==========
Had Enough?
==========
PS See how versatile this little slogan is?
There is no doubt that a lot of parents care about school quality. Elizabeth Warren’s study of bankruptcy showed that working families were stretching themselves to the limit to buy houses in “good” school districts. There is also no doubt that teachers’ unions get blamed (in states that have such unions) for everything that is wrong with public education. It’s the same mindset that blames the civil service for everything that’s wrong with the government.
That makes about as much sense as blaming energy workers for what was wrong with Enron. I want to yell at them, “It’s the management, you idiots — and while we’re on the subject, why don’t you pass school bonds?” Someday maybe people will realize that government isn’t free and that not all taxes are visible. We all pay for bad schools, just as we all pay for bad health care. So why don’t teachers’ unions do a better job of pointing that out? After all, if teachers can’t educate the public, who can?
Go, Phil, go!
Spot on !! I have a grand daughter who taught 2nd grade for her 2nd year and know she will appreciate your well written account. Thank you and please don’t be offended, if I say you truely do GOD’S work in this complicated vineyard. Thank you. James
In the 70’s and 8o’s there were lawsuits brought in several states challenging how shcools were funded–WV was one of those states where the suits were successful—schools cannot be funded locally, and therefore, what a school can provide is not determined by the tax base of the individual school district (counties in WV)—we are not held captive by local manufacturing/corporations. Schools are funded from the general revenue fund and that puts the pressure on the legislature, not the local board (so repugs have not taken over the local boards—they have much less say in the funding of the shcools). It also means that changes in fortunes in one area are spread across the state not absorbed by one school district.
No school can build anything without approval of the SBA–a centralized school building authority who each year determines how much money for building there iThis has really helped the poorer, rural counties who were beholden to theplight/flight of the coal industry. It’s not perfect, but it has gone a long way toequalizing education—and keeping charter schools out 9the localsprobably could not do it and the state would run into all sorts of opposition)
That doesn’t address however, the decline of unions, although, I’m not sure what the DNC can do about it
ever since schooling was made available to the lumpenproles as a mandatory exercise, the role of teachers has shifted from one of education the privileged to one of training the labor force…
not their fault, really; except that teachers tend to come from the ranks of people who did well in school; i.e., demonstrated themselves susceptible and amenable to training…
.
Unions are the biggest part of the Democratic Party GOTV effort. But what has the party done for the Unions? Nothing I can see. Even in the first two years of the Clinton Administration, nothing was done to strengthen the laws protecting unions. A party that does not take care of its friends does not deserve to win.
Great post Jordan. It is particularly discouraging when there is no good system to protect employees providing the most central and basic of community service - like education.
Anne: Am tired of the argument that people who send their kids to private schools deserve something more because their tax dollars support the public schools that they are not using. Ditto - the mega churches, too, are using their programs as $$ generators - after all, no property tax and a building ready to go doesn’t hurt.
I know a lot of megachurch people and when vouchers come up, I don’t have any problem with reminding them that property taxes, as well as “there” fed tax $$$, fund local education. So does that mean that all those who don’t have children should get reduced property taxes and up the property taxes of the “users” like them? Or should I get a doggie day care voucher - or maybe a barn help voucher - so I get ‘equal’ benefit?
And while we’re at it - shouldn’t their megachurch be paying taxes on that property, like other private schools? Should people who use non-church private schools get a second voucher - one for their fed taxes that are supporting the public schools, and one for their local prop taxes that support the tax free status of church property.
All such a silly argument. Taxes are for govt services and we use them unevenly. But they generate a society from which we all benefit equally.
Taxes are for govt services and we use them unevenly. But they generate a society from which we all benefit equally.
This is the great societal truth that the Republicans wish to destroy. One can talk about crime prevention and universal literacy in the same way. This is why Social Security is such a target for Bush et al. Sadly, there are no “neighbors” in their ‘hood.
mommybrain,
I don’t know where to begin. I guess I’ll start with “if you took all the “fuck’s” out of this guy’s website it would be a lot shorter. Like 5 inches……”
Taxes are not charged top churches, traditionally, because they were traditionally thought to supply some ‘value’ to their communities.
But, unless they’re housing and feeding the homeless and other disadvantaged members of the community, i think churches ought to at least pay property taxes to support local services.
personally, i wouldn’t be at all averse to taxing churches into fucking penury…
Of course, this same kind of harassment of teachers by principles can happen at regular old unionized schools in NYC too.
see here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B.....igh_School
Scroll down to the part about Principal McCaskill
It’s just done through other channels than firing.
NYC is desperate for teachers. The teacher in this article, unless they are absolute bottom of the barrel, can get a job at in the unionized system. There’s a good chance that they didn’t because they liked the flexibility that charter schools offered. If the charter school fires good teachers for bad reasons, then in theory the students & parents would vote with their feet an leave the school, along with those good teachers.
The New York City school system, though better than a lot of big city school systems, is a big mess. The UFT generally protects teachers at all costs, fighting for rules that allow bad teachers to stick around.
I’m a member of a union, and work in a heavily unionized field (film production). I appreciate the various unions greatly for its pension (union funded so much less likely to collapse), it’s health insurance and a number of work rules that prevent me & my coworkers from being worked within an inch of our lives. What I don’t appreciate are inflexibility and padding, lack of democracy and plain old bullying by many people in union leadership, leadership being in bed with the pension & 401K managers (thus draining away my retirement funds), not fighting strongly for universal health care because of their ties to union health care plans, etc. etc.
Working people in non-unionized sectors who resist unions aren’t just brainwashed. There’s lots of reasons, (some listed above) not to join one. Knee jerk pro-union posts like this one do a disservice by not recognizing this.
My kids go to a charter school, just where the district lies. While it has mantained programs that the other school have abandoned (art, drama, teaching spanish as a second language) I have noticed a lot of teacher turnover. Make sense if they have an “at-will” policy.
I understand in the UK charities such as churches only pay 50% of the normal property tax bill — a sort of eleemosinary discount, i suppose
Education is inherently inefficient compared to other segments of the economy. Technology allows a farmer, an accountant, an autoworker, or computer builder to produce more and more. This is not true in education. A teacher can teach about 20-25 students well in a class. This has not changed much in the last century. You can introduce technology into the classroom. You can increase class sizes and increase efficiency technically, but education will not correspondingly improve in quality. It will go down. Widgets and productivity are one thing, people are something else. They are inelastic this way. So as the cost of many things goes down over time due to increased efficiencies; the relative cost of education does not. It increases. People get pissed off because they think education costs more and they are right. It does. What is overlooked is that this is inherently the case.
When you overlay on to this the wildly inequitable funding of education based still largely on property taxes (with variable state support and both state and federal mandates), you have a toxic brew. K-12 education in the US sucks compared to many other developed countries. The reason is that it is institutionally underfunded and unevenly funded.
imm at 43, I think they’d find the very idea of neighbors rather tacky. They find “poor,” “ill,” and “war-wounded” people tacky. Of course they use them as props…
Another excellent post, Jordan.
1. Teachers need some form of protection - either tenure or a union - against political pressure. Suppose the mayor or police chief or local rainmaker has an unruly kid. Suppose teacher punishes kid. Suppose kid’s dad pushes back - “my little angel would never do such a thing!” Suppose kid’s dad hires the local Johnny Cochran. Teacher’s in a bad spot without some protection.
2. Given all the domestic spying going on, what happens if a teacher questions the war?
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/n.....E_ID=49079
3. You expect unions to take a hit under Republicans. It’s another thing when the Dems bend you over (NAFTA). The unions bosses would be the first to bitch about sell-out Democrats - I’ve heard them do it - but they never hold pols accountable. They never cut off the PAC money. They never tell the troops to sit it out for a guy like Lieberman.
4. I think two things created bias against public education. Before WWII, only those with means could get a higher education, or even graduate high school. The GI Bill sent our dads and grandads to college, and they found out they could compete with the elite. The elite actually had to produce, as opposed to exploit. Things got out of hand - a sizable middle class was created, and we ungrateful bastards got uppity. The elite needed to put that genie back in the bottle.
When the Supreme Court finally decided the Constitution meant what it said and intergrated the schools, ‘church’ schools sprang up all over the South. The tuition was pegged just high enough to keep the poor (and most blacks) out of them. Since the church school kids weren’t in the public school system, the parents figured, why pay for it? They don’t give a damn about the public schools, and they are now in charge.
“Between 1896 and 1920, a small group of industrialists and financiers, together with their private charitable foundations, subsidized university chairs, university researchers, and school administrators, spent more money on forced schooling than the government itself did. Carnegie and Rockefeller, as late as 1915, were spending more themselves. In this laissez-faire fashion a system of modern schooling was constructed without public participation. The motives for this are undoubtedly mixed, but it will be useful for you to hear a few excerpts from the first mission statement of Rockefeller’s General Education Board as they occur in a document called Occasional Letter Number One (1906):
In our dreams…people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. The present educational conventions [intellectual and character education] fade from our minds, and unhampered by tradition we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or men of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, educators, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we have ample supply. The task we set before ourselves is very simple…we will organize children…and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way.”
http://www.rit.edu/~cma8660/mi.....ers/2i.htm
In a speech he gave before businessmen prior to the First World War, Woodrow Wilson made this unabashed disclosure:
“We want one class to have a liberal education. We want another class, a very much larger class of necessity, to forgo the privilege of a liberal education and fit themselves to perform specific difficult manual tasks.”
Jordan, I do appreciate your point of view. I have observed worker’s rights fade away over the years. The state of Texas is a right to work state and the stress levels in the workplace here are horrible. Grassroots progressives are working hard to turn things aroung and you are right — can’t sit on the sidelines anymore.
I belong to a Mexico forum as I might retire there and you should read about our country from the perspective of the rest of the world.
If our electorate hasn’t “had enough” then we have serious problems.
Jordan –
Thank you! Just like your last posting here, this one is great.
The union movement began because the “pillars of the community,” those business and community “leaders” in control of the mechanisms of society could not be bothered treating workers with the decency one would expect from anyone with the nerve to call himself Christian — or even just HUMAN.
There would never have been such a thing as a union movement to begin with (nor any such thing as “socialism” or even “communism”) if those who claimed to have “moral authority” had acted in even a remotely moral manner toward their fellow human beings.
Greed rules the day when there is no organization and no laws to protect the “little guy.” This has been always true. The greed and cruelty of the robber barons and the fat cats on Wall Street brought us the Great Depression, which in turn gave birth to the presidency of FDR and his huge popularity among the entire populace (with the exception of the top 2% who hated him for being a “traitor to his class”).
Nothing has changed in the interim to alter the fundamental way in which the world works in these matters. You starve the “little guys” and abuse them and make it impossible for them to even have dignity remaining in their work, and if you’re lucky you’ll end up with an FDR-type instead of something much more radical — FDR actually saved capitalism. You’d think that some of these fat cats might actually have read and understood a bit of history, but no.
It seems like every day I read and hear more people commenting on FDR’s accomplishments. [I thought this would begin to happen, actually.] I think this memory of prior progressive reform and of the union movement will only become more pronounced as time goes on and this economy goes over the cliff it’s teetering on — if we’re lucky the fall will be in slow motion rather than a speedy crash.
The “elite” ought to be praying for another FDR type to arise and lead in any new time of crisis, rather than someone a bit more, uh, dramatic.
Happy Fourth to all the FDL Firepups and (and to all lurkers, too), who love our Constitution and the promise of what this country CAN be when it lives up to its founding priciples. It is a comfort to know you all are out there, and that we form a community of patriots who will not give up until we get this nation back on track in commitment to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
Nothing human is perfect, and unions are certainly human. Two of my former colleagues many years ago worked with Teamsters for a Democratic Union, a dissident group that was trying to get the union leaders to actually work on behalf of the members rather than fortheir own power and enrichment. In those days, messing with the Teamsters was really, really dangerous. And it wasn’t just the Teamsters. I worked in the theater in my youth, and some of the craft unions (as well as the Musician’s Union) were widely believed to be mobbed up.
While that is, I hope, in the past, part of the Union Label problem may be a perception that Big Labor is just another big institution too far removed from the everyday concerns of ordinary Americans. An increasingly dwindling number of workers have actually experienced the difference a union can make. And I wonder just how much attention, if any, public school history classes pay to the history of the labor movement? Oh wait — silly me, history isn’t on the FCAT so it isn’t really taught anymore.
Anyway, the fact that unions are inevitably flawed doesn’t mean we would be better off without them — and the fact that a place isn’t unionized sure doesn’t mean that the employees prefer it that way! Potential organizers like Ms. Lau get fired and that message is heard loud and clear. A functioning NLRB would help, but that’s not gonna happen with a Republican Secretary of Labor. So where’s Norma Rae now that we really need her?
(Yikes! It looks like my comment was eaten by the cyber monster — luckily I put it on my clipboard, since this happened to me the other day. So here goes again:}
Jordan –
Thank you! Just like your last posting here, this one is great.
The union movement began because the “pillars of the community,” those business and community “leaders” in control of the mechanisms of society could not be bothered treating workers with the decency one would expect from anyone with the nerve to call himself Christian — or even just HUMAN.
There would never have been such a thing as a union movement to begin with (nor any such thing as “socialism” or even “communism”) if those who claimed to have “moral authority” had acted in even a remotely moral manner toward their fellow human beings.
Greed rules the day when there is no organization and no laws to protect the “little guy.” This has been always true. The greed and cruelty of the robber barons and the fat cats on Wall Street brought us the Great Depression, which in turn gave birth to the presidency of FDR and his huge popularity among the entire populace (with the exception of the top 2% who hated him for being a “traitor to his class”).
Nothing has changed in the interim to alter the fundamental way in which the world works in these matters. You starve the “little guys” and abuse them and make it impossible for them to even have dignity remaining in their work, and if you’re lucky you’ll end up with an FDR-type instead of something much more radical — FDR actually saved capitalism. You’d think that some of these fat cats might actually have read and understood a bit of history, but no.
It seems like every day I read and hear more people commenting on FDR’s accomplishments. [I thought this would begin to happen, actually.] I think this memory of prior progressive reform and of the union movement will only become more pronounced as time goes on and this economy goes over the cliff it’s teetering on — if we’re lucky the fall will be in slow motion rather than a speedy crash.
The “elite” ought to be praying for another FDR type to arise and lead in any new time of crisis, rather than someone a bit more, uh, dramatic.
Happy Fourth to all the FDL Firepups and (and to all lurkers, too), who love our Constitution and the promise of what this country CAN be when it lives up to its founding priciples. It is a comfort to know you all are out there, and that we form a community of patriots who will not give up until we get this nation back on track in commitment to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
Great series, Jordan.
But I’m going to point out that unions are not a guarantee of either equitable treatment like they once were, nor a protection against stupidity in politics. UAW and AFL-CIO allowed far too many in-roads by elected officials against their Wagner Act rights to bargain this past year, by accepting legislation that permitted the automaker GM to break agreements about negotiated retirement requirements and benefits. What good is a union if it regresses AND allows automakers to contemplate doing the same again in the near future?
As for stupidity in politics: we are having a problem with an educational union in my state. They are going to endorse a REPUBLICAN candidate for state legislature, even though his voting record on education is far from acceptable, BEFORE THE PRIMARY. They are also going to do this on the basis of a single interview with candidates, ignoring the fact that the Democratic candidate is and has been a TEACHER for 25 years.
This is stupid…or there’s something corrupt going on here.
Teachers should definitely join unions or organize, whereever possible, but they should not expect that they will be represented well unless they take an active role in the union. It’s rather like democracy in general; we get out of it what we put into it.
Thankyou Di 52,That was the other side that I neglected to mention.Our education system ,such as it is was not made with the publics interest in mind.What was desired was warriors ,and wageslaves.You see,when the lower classes can rationaly think about their position in the great scheme of things they get uppity…
I get a little testy when I hear people disparage “training people for the labour market”. Last I checked, most people do end up working for a living, and it seems unfair not to make sure kids get the skills they will need to function.
I don’t support the corporatization of schools, but I have a problem with schools staffed almost entirely with people who have never done much beside go to school or teach in a school - and I have lost patience with curricula that assume everyone should be prepared for a university education.
Janet
Here’s my pre-Late Nite reminder:
WaPoO chats tomorrow — questions accepted right now, early and polite usually gets you picked!
Charles Babington (Congressional reporter) at 11am eastern
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....01137.html
Froomkin at 1pm eastern
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....01676.html
Mark Plotkin (local politics) at 2 eastern
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....01088.html
Oh good grief!
So sorry for the double post. But what the heck goes on? Post disappears, or rather refuses to appear. Re-posting attempt brings about the same result.
It took going away from the site, the firing it up again, to be able to see my comment (times two).
Anybody else having problems? Or am I in the Twilight Zone by my lonesome? :-)
My heartfelt prayers and hopes go out to the men and women who, at this moment, are giving their all for us..God Bless.
EXCELLENT article!
I’m union, have been non-union and if I have my choice, I will never work in a non-union shop again. If where I live becomes a “Right to Work” State, I’ll move.
But that’s not what I want to point out. My Aunt, who’s a nurse, was never union before, is getting ready to go out on Strike for the first time in her life. She’s the angel of the family. Although she’s real close to retirement, she’s fighting for working mechanical beds for her patients. It drives her crazy to see them suffer, because the Hosptial at which she works, won’t spend the money where it needs to be spent. Management individually tried to pressure these nurses and they threatened to fire her and she laughed at them, as she’s close to retirement and flat out told them that the money was not why she’d be striking! Meanwhile, the hospital administrator makes $500,000.00 annually! Her union is fighting for not only themselves, but for the patients they serve. They’d be on strike right now, if Hillary hadn’t stepped in and asked Management and the Union to extend negotiations till next Monday. This is going to get ugly, as management has already arranged for contract (SCAB) nurses. But local deliveries won’t take place, because those who know these nurses won’t cross the picket lines. They had a 1 day “informational strike” and nearly all of delivery guys stopped and asked and only when assured, drove in with the goods the Hospital needed. The reason I point this fact out is that sometimes union members benefit more than just themselves.
Then again, we all should thank unions for what USED TO BE a 40 Hour Work Week and the few protections we have now–like child labor laws.
Well, the UFT has the votes in Albany to make more charter schools impossible. The mayor and the governor wanted more than 100 charters, but the union said no, unless they can unionize the teachers.
But another ongoing issue here is the financial management of the school. The missing 401k money is a bad sign.
Everyone is waiting for Spitzer to be elected, then they will make their move on some onerous work rules.
Workplace rights? What’s that? Think about being told it was noticed your “work performance” was declining (no documentaion) the last three months before your lung cancer surgery. I guess the missing work from having to attend CT scans, PET scans, evaluation of recovery from surgery testing, lack of focus on future contributimight have had something to do with it.
Think about being moved from your normal job duties and being told your performance is under evaluation upon return from successful surgery. Think about another spot being seen on your first CT scan. Think about being terrified you’re going to lose your job and be without insurance facing the entire $300,000 of testing again.
It happens. Think about it.
Peace!
for all you legal eagles a question: is a contract with a union thru a city actually a public document and therefore all the info in it is public information?
Bravo.
I’m a tenured full professor and a proud union member. Thirty years ago our faculty voted to organize. The issue wasn’t economic: it was governance, having the degree of control over curricular issues which our professional training demanded. It was a radical step back then. Some of my colleagues thought Unions were for “them”…you know, the blue collar drudges, and not for “us”–the elite of the meritocracy. But we recognized, ultimately, that without collective bargaining we were all drudges, regardless of the colors of our collars.
When the rest of the nation awakes to its vulnerability in a corporate finance dominated global economy, regardless of education, regardless of professional skill, perhaps we’ll see a resurgence of the union movement. Teachers have provided a model. I hope the Union movement devotes some energy to organizing other “professionals” who may think of themselves as managers but who are as managed as any other working stiff.
Thanks for the link to the DMIblog Jordon. You’d doing great work as always educating the netroots!
One of the bigger issues that this charter school may face with regard to the fired teachers is the fact that the teachers may have a right of action against the school under Section 511 of ERISA. This federal law protects employee retirement funds and prohibits employers from firing their employees as a means of preventing employees from rights under those funds. ERISA protects both traditional pension funds and pension funds such as the 401k. If these teachers were fired because they were trying to learn what happened to their 401ks or to the funds that went into their 401ks, then they should seek legal advice on whether or not they have a right of action against the school. While employers in at-will states have the “right” to fire employees for almost anything, they do not have the right to fire them for reasons that violate the law, i.e. discrimination, preventing them from obtain a right guaranteed by state and federal law, etc.
It’s remarkable that the charter crowd can complain.
If they want the cap lifted, let them allow ananymous card checks in their schools, so that working teachers can choose whether or not they want unions.
If they’re unwilling to do that, they’re simply anti-union. I’d rather stand with 80,000 NYC teachers than all by myself. I suspect those who teach at charters feel the same.
And if they don’t, let them vote no.
The problem here, as with most of the country, is that emplyers don’t want them to vote at all.