<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Signs of the Times?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:44:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: charlesf</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-170254</link>
		<dc:creator>charlesf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 08:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-170254</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;x174, billmon has mulled it over also, and has updated his post on the nyt:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://billmon.org/archives/002498.html&quot;&gt;http://billmon.org/archives/002498.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
if i am reading him correctly, he thinks that they have picked the wrong place to make a stand, since financial tracking may not be a crime, and americans are willing to give up rights for security. but i still don’t understand why billmon thinks the nyt is ‘pursu(ing) a crusade’ against the administration, or why they should even be considered part of our plans. i’d say at this point, i would be happy if the nyt just did their job again, and this story is part of that job. i am flabbergasted that billmon, someone whose writing i’ve respected and enjoyed for some time, is suggesting our papers sit on stories for the purpose of some grand strategy of ours for winning back the country. the press is already emasculated, ham-strung, compromised, dibilitated, and any other watb word you can think of. please, let the press give us more facts, not less. reality is rove’s worst nightmare.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>x174, billmon has mulled it over also, and has updated his post on the nyt:<br />
<a href="http://billmon.org/archives/002498.html">http://billmon.org/archives/002498.html</a><br />
if i am reading him correctly, he thinks that they have picked the wrong place to make a stand, since financial tracking may not be a crime, and americans are willing to give up rights for security. but i still don’t understand why billmon thinks the nyt is ‘pursu(ing) a crusade’ against the administration, or why they should even be considered part of our plans. i’d say at this point, i would be happy if the nyt just did their job again, and this story is part of that job. i am flabbergasted that billmon, someone whose writing i’ve respected and enjoyed for some time, is suggesting our papers sit on stories for the purpose of some grand strategy of ours for winning back the country. the press is already emasculated, ham-strung, compromised, dibilitated, and any other watb word you can think of. please, let the press give us more facts, not less. reality is rove’s worst nightmare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: x174</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-170045</link>
		<dc:creator>x174</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 03:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-170045</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;after mulling it over, i disagree with billmon’s belief that the Times shouldn’t and shall not report on the resident-in-chief’s surveillance programs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i applaud the Times’ courage and would argue against capitualting in the face of tyranny.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nevertheless, i think billmon should still post more often and also take comments.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after mulling it over, i disagree with billmon’s belief that the Times shouldn’t and shall not report on the resident-in-chief’s surveillance programs.</p>
<p>i applaud the Times’ courage and would argue against capitualting in the face of tyranny.</p>
<p>nevertheless, i think billmon should still post more often and also take comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: x174</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169794</link>
		<dc:creator>x174</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169794</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;billmon to the rescue!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;though i wouldn’t presume to take billmon’s considerations lightly, i believe that what the NYT did in publishing the swift article was correct from the perspective of journalistic ethics—something the (grim and) grey lady desperately needs—i will consider billmon’s after-the-fact idea of withholding the piece, fwiw.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but, imo, if billmon wants to help turn the tide in this monstrous game of political brinkmanship, i for one think that he should post more regularly AND take comments (more) occasionally.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the respect that i have seen attested towards  billmon and his ususally very well-considered views leads me to think that the whiskey bar could once AGAIN become a vortex of despair for the rovians and his rabidly vile excrement-flinging zombies—-formerly known as republicans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;billmon to the rescue!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>billmon to the rescue!</b></p>
<p>though i wouldn’t presume to take billmon’s considerations lightly, i believe that what the NYT did in publishing the swift article was correct from the perspective of journalistic ethics—something the (grim and) grey lady desperately needs—i will consider billmon’s after-the-fact idea of withholding the piece, fwiw.</p>
<p>but, imo, if billmon wants to help turn the tide in this monstrous game of political brinkmanship, i for one think that he should post more regularly AND take comments (more) occasionally.</p>
<p>the respect that i have seen attested towards  billmon and his ususally very well-considered views leads me to think that the whiskey bar could once AGAIN become a vortex of despair for the rovians and his rabidly vile excrement-flinging zombies—-formerly known as republicans.</p>
<p>billmon to the rescue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayne</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169549</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169549</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;cbl 11:21 am — “about commerce”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yeah.  Commerce is like their manhood, at least in the neo-con world.  It’s the real source of their power, the corporatist chakra.  If we hit them in the commerce, it’ll crush them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Remember the Dubai Ports deal? (yeah, Dubai now owns the ports gang…hold that thought.)  That REALLY rocked their world because it was the commerce and the corporatist folks who were pissed off about it.  Non-stop wall-to-wall coverage on CNBC.  If it got the same coverage AGAIN on CNBC, it would do some serious damage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See my comment above about NYT and strategy.  I think this is has possibilities.  NYT being a port-town paper and the one that many commerce/corporatists read, I think we could press them for follow-up coverage. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think we could also tell Schumer he can redeem himself if he follows up and puts the screws on this story again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And I think we slip them the shiv by asking CNBC and [can’t think of his name] WSJ reporter to follow up on this as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cbl 11:21 am — “about commerce”</p>
<p>Yeah.  Commerce is like their manhood, at least in the neo-con world.  It’s the real source of their power, the corporatist chakra.  If we hit them in the commerce, it’ll crush them.</p>
<p>Remember the Dubai Ports deal? (yeah, Dubai now owns the ports gang…hold that thought.)  That REALLY rocked their world because it was the commerce and the corporatist folks who were pissed off about it.  Non-stop wall-to-wall coverage on CNBC.  If it got the same coverage AGAIN on CNBC, it would do some serious damage.</p>
<p>See my comment above about NYT and strategy.  I think this is has possibilities.  NYT being a port-town paper and the one that many commerce/corporatists read, I think we could press them for follow-up coverage. </p>
<p>I think we could also tell Schumer he can redeem himself if he follows up and puts the screws on this story again.</p>
<p>And I think we slip them the shiv by asking CNBC and [can’t think of his name] WSJ reporter to follow up on this as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayne</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169528</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169528</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Stephen Parrish — FMA = Federal Marriage Amendment.  Probably used the wrong acronym, sorry.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Parrish — FMA = Federal Marriage Amendment.  Probably used the wrong acronym, sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayne</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169525</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169525</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.  Had to drop off for a bit and look what happens…Billmon drops in and I missed him.  Nuts, that’ll teach me to leave FDL for even a minute!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Billmon’s correct about the need for a strategy; it’s hard to argue with success and that’s exactly what it was that brought progressives to this place in history, successful media strategy on the part of the right.  They had a strategy as well as an infrastructure and it’s been working for them for decades now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We’re finally building an infrastructure, but we have no strategy; a few people are trying to do what is the equivalent of herding cats to move the oceanliner that is Progressive Blogdom, but without the effect we need as a whole.  We need something more in the way of strategy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We must also acknowledge we do both beta and full product release in tandem; we have no room for a pilot project, must release as we develop on the fly.  But the stakes are too damned high not to do so.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I agree whole-heartedly with Jane about the NYT; they’ve proven themselves unreliable and easily manipulated.  Could we manipulate them to our needs is the question, keeping in mind that they are very much in the right’s tool box?  Doubtful — but perhaps we get ourselves organized and assign a crack squad to keep them occupied while trying to manipulate them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The biggest challenge I think we have is organizing an open source media in concert with an open source think tank and open source tactical team — while remaining below radar.  We would be running thin to count on speed alone; flying undetected must be considered a part of the arsenal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Relatedly, I found a post at WorldChanging today about bloggers and media, about the release of an online book: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/wp-content/RSFBloggerGuide2005.pdf&quot;&gt;Reporters without Borders: Handbook for Bloggers and Cyber-dissidents&lt;/a&gt;.  Maybe Jay Rosen would be willing to come and participate in a book chat about this?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Had to drop off for a bit and look what happens…Billmon drops in and I missed him.  Nuts, that’ll teach me to leave FDL for even a minute!!</p>
<p>Billmon’s correct about the need for a strategy; it’s hard to argue with success and that’s exactly what it was that brought progressives to this place in history, successful media strategy on the part of the right.  They had a strategy as well as an infrastructure and it’s been working for them for decades now.</p>
<p>We’re finally building an infrastructure, but we have no strategy; a few people are trying to do what is the equivalent of herding cats to move the oceanliner that is Progressive Blogdom, but without the effect we need as a whole.  We need something more in the way of strategy.</p>
<p>We must also acknowledge we do both beta and full product release in tandem; we have no room for a pilot project, must release as we develop on the fly.  But the stakes are too damned high not to do so.</p>
<p>I agree whole-heartedly with Jane about the NYT; they’ve proven themselves unreliable and easily manipulated.  Could we manipulate them to our needs is the question, keeping in mind that they are very much in the right’s tool box?  Doubtful — but perhaps we get ourselves organized and assign a crack squad to keep them occupied while trying to manipulate them.</p>
<p>The biggest challenge I think we have is organizing an open source media in concert with an open source think tank and open source tactical team — while remaining below radar.  We would be running thin to count on speed alone; flying undetected must be considered a part of the arsenal.</p>
<p>Relatedly, I found a post at WorldChanging today about bloggers and media, about the release of an online book: <a href="http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/wp-content/RSFBloggerGuide2005.pdf">Reporters without Borders: Handbook for Bloggers and Cyber-dissidents</a>.  Maybe Jay Rosen would be willing to come and participate in a book chat about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ehrenstein</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169503</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169503</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Right back atcha, siun!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I came face-to-face with The Truth in 1961 on my very first day at &lt;i&gt;Communist Martyrs High&lt;/i&gt; (aka. The High School of Music and Art in New York City.) As the overwhelming majority of my classmates were “Red Diaper Babies” the school was under police surveillance at all times. Our favorte sport was freakign out the cops from the “Red Squad” in the cars they had parked in front of the school to watch our every move. The noodnicks thought they were being discreet but we could spot them in a nanosecond. We’d walk up to the car and they’d floor it and drive away. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Later when I joined the anti-war movement, at the same time I was a member of media committee of the Gay Activists Alliance, my phone was tapped I used to say all sorts of things to freak them out.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right back atcha, siun!</p>
<p>I came face-to-face with The Truth in 1961 on my very first day at <i>Communist Martyrs High</i> (aka. The High School of Music and Art in New York City.) As the overwhelming majority of my classmates were “Red Diaper Babies” the school was under police surveillance at all times. Our favorte sport was freakign out the cops from the “Red Squad” in the cars they had parked in front of the school to watch our every move. The noodnicks thought they were being discreet but we could spot them in a nanosecond. We’d walk up to the car and they’d floor it and drive away. </p>
<p>Later when I joined the anti-war movement, at the same time I was a member of media committee of the Gay Activists Alliance, my phone was tapped I used to say all sorts of things to freak them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katie Jensen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169495</link>
		<dc:creator>katie Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169495</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wanted to respond to the idea about the “right wing blather”.  They are not whipping up the base. They don’t care.  They are pacifying. Period.  They just need plausible reasons for what they do. Plausible enough to keep the masses from getting upset.  They have the power.  They have the elections.  They have the senate, they have the house.  They have the oil or at least access to it.  Saudi is that connection. Bush and the Saudi’s have a very clear cut relationship.  Saudi owns much of our country.  This has been coming for a long time and in my humble opinion there is only one peaceful solution and that is to remove their power by refusing to use their oil.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We must develop a cheap alternative and commit to using it.  Bush co wants to keep us pacified in our big cars.  They will use whatever method works.  These are their golden years.  As the oil runs thinner, they make their biggest profits.  They don’t want us to get upset enough that we do something drastic like stop using their oil.  They will (like a good drug dealer) slowly raise the price.  Not too fast.  Just fast enough.  They will block any legislation that threatens these last golden years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The solution is a solution to the oil crises…it is the only way to get our democracy back…we must stop needing them.  This is without a doubt the solution to the alcoholic relationship…we are the codependents folks!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to respond to the idea about the “right wing blather”.  They are not whipping up the base. They don’t care.  They are pacifying. Period.  They just need plausible reasons for what they do. Plausible enough to keep the masses from getting upset.  They have the power.  They have the elections.  They have the senate, they have the house.  They have the oil or at least access to it.  Saudi is that connection. Bush and the Saudi’s have a very clear cut relationship.  Saudi owns much of our country.  This has been coming for a long time and in my humble opinion there is only one peaceful solution and that is to remove their power by refusing to use their oil.  </p>
<p>We must develop a cheap alternative and commit to using it.  Bush co wants to keep us pacified in our big cars.  They will use whatever method works.  These are their golden years.  As the oil runs thinner, they make their biggest profits.  They don’t want us to get upset enough that we do something drastic like stop using their oil.  They will (like a good drug dealer) slowly raise the price.  Not too fast.  Just fast enough.  They will block any legislation that threatens these last golden years.</p>
<p>The solution is a solution to the oil crises…it is the only way to get our democracy back…we must stop needing them.  This is without a doubt the solution to the alcoholic relationship…we are the codependents folks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ck</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169469</link>
		<dc:creator>ck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169469</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Chris Bowers has a What-Should-We-Call-The-Media post at MyDD. The Winner, by acclimation of Chris Bowers, is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Establishment Media&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mydd.com/story/2006/7/2/122645/5623#25&quot;&gt;http://mydd.com/story/2006/7/2/122645/5623#25&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Bowers has a What-Should-We-Call-The-Media post at MyDD. The Winner, by acclimation of Chris Bowers, is:</p>
<p><b>Establishment Media</b></p>
<p><a href="http://mydd.com/story/2006/7/2/122645/5623#25">http://mydd.com/story/2006/7/2/122645/5623#25</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LindaR</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169459</link>
		<dc:creator>LindaR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/07/02/signs-of-the-times/#comment-169459</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;tryqqth 169  — I haven’t the foggiest, really.  I’m just not a poll person.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tryqqth 169  — I haven’t the foggiest, really.  I’m just not a poll person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
