
The "pretend to do something while we're really standing up for the status quo" Congress is at it again. All that talk about lobbying and corruption reforms in the wake of the myriad of Republican corruption and bribery scandals, indictments and guilty pleas...well, it was all a lot of hot air designed to provide public CYA for the next election, according to the WaPo:
When Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) announced his resignation as majority leader in January -- soon after lobbyist Jack Abramoff pleaded guilty to corruption charges -- House Republicans panicked. Dozens of GOP lawmakers, fearing a political backlash, flooded the office of House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) with urgent pleas for lobbying reform.Their message was clear: Hastert needed to champion legislation to crack down on unethical behavior and impose tough new restrictions on lobbyists and congressional perks. Hastert, who had previously shown scant interest in the issue, responded with proposals that surprised longtime reformers with their reach: a ban on privately funded travel by lawmakers and severe restrictions on lobbyist-paid meals.
"We need to reform the rules so that it is clear, beyond a shadow of a doubt, what is ethically acceptable," Hastert said at a news conference 10 days after DeLay stepped down.
But that was then. Six months later, the legislation has slowed to a crawl. Along the way, proposals such as Hastert's that would sharply limit commonplace behavior on Capitol Hill have been cast aside. Committee chairmen once predicted the bill would be finished in March, but the Senate did not pass its ethics bill until March 29 and the House passed its version May 3. The House has yet to name negotiators to draft the final package.
Legislators and public-interest group advocates say the most likely result this year is a minimalist package that would allow members to say they have responded to the Abramoff situation and other scandals but would do little to crimp their ability to accept lobbyist favors.
Oh yeah, I got yer "public interest" right here. Do they think that everyone in America is so caught up on who is hitting whom with a chair on the WWF this week that we won't notice that they have done absolutely NOTHING -- that every action taken is mere window dressing?
Let's take a stroll down Republican Corruption Memory Lane this morning, shall we? I think we all need to refresh our recollections as to just how broad the reach is in terms of lobbying efforts, bribery and looking the other way in the Rubber Stamp Republican Congress of Corruption:

Meet Tom Delay. Former Republican House Majority Leader -- I say former because he has resigned his seat in the House to deal with a multiple felony indictment in the State of Texas, and an alleged pending investigation by the Department of Justice on his KStreet "pay to play" activities and his crony friendship (and that of multitudes of his former staffers) with Jack Abramoff. This lovely photo was taken with President Bush around the time of DeLay's indictment -- in a show of solidarity. Cozy.

Meet Jack Abramoff, Ralph Reed, David Safavian and Bob Ney. (The tall guy in the back, Jack Murdoch, is the bloke who organized the golf junket and is now stuck in a photo with these bozos for all eternity.) Jack Abramoff, uber-GOP lobbyist and power dealer in Washington recently plead guilty to a multiple felony federal plea. He's awaiting sentencing. David Safavian was found guilty of multiple federal felonies by a jury of his peers last week -- he's also awaiting sentencing. Bob Ney is a Congressman from Ohio (for the moment...) and is allegedly under federal investigation for corruption and bribery charges -- and he is now alleged to have lied to Senate investigators. (Ouch.) Ralph Reed is having a pretty bad week himself, since Sen. McCain released lots of documents late last week that make Reed look like a hypocritical user of his Christian Coalition pals for Reed's own personal accumulation of wealth and power. What a group of family values fellas, eh?

Meet former Republican Congressman Duke Cunningham -- he's accepted responsibility for multiple federal felonies, including bribery, and is now cooperating in the investigation of an even larger bribery and corruption scandal involving hookers, limos, poker and...

Republican Rep. Jerry Lewis, also of California, who heads up the powerful House Appropriations Committee.
And that's just the first few that I pulled off the top of my head this morning before I've even finished my first cup of coffee. Your Republican government in action..nothing like a lot of feeding at the trough, I suppose, and never mind the real people (you know, the "constituents") that you are supposed to represent. Sheesh.
Who did I miss? List your favorites and maybe we'll get some more rogues gallery photos up...
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Yahoo!! I’m first!
No, I am…you’re at zero
fitz
MMPPH!! GMPGHH!!
Here’s a link to Madsen’s corruption scorecard, if you need a refresher
http://waynemadsenreport.com/gopscorecard.php
Someone please remove TRex’s gag - he’s suffered enough. (*g*)
LOL Anne — poor TRex…
How did lobbying become the evil that it is in my mind?
The idea of agitating or informing a congresscritter about an interest is not necessarily a bad thing. One would think people who have expertise do help congresscritters understand complex issues.
How did this “information” providing mechanism get so corrupt?
pssst: TRex…can you hear me? Here’s a little cake with something sharp in it. I’ll be waiting outside with the motor running. Hurry we don’t have much time.
———egr
Sadly, the answer is “Yes” for many on your WWF question. That, or they think that all politicians are corrupt and the Republican scandals just confirm this view.
By the way, anybody else tired of hearing about Markos and The New Republic? That dead horse has been beaten, chopped, drawn, quartered and mulched. TRex’s post notwithstanding, of course, because it was funny.
DefJef, it depends on how many decimal places “information” has.
DefJef at 8 — when it morphed from being a way to persuade Congress about an aggregated group of citizens’ interests to a “pay to play” method of corporations and other powerful groups buying whatever they wanted from powerful members of Congress. All of the money floating around is nauseating. I have nothing against people making money — or lobbying for their own interests (hell, we encourage that all the time here, with the phone calls and faxes and all) — but throwing money around to put an elected official in your pocket is disgusting on so many levels.
Sam at 10 — I was tired of it last Wednesday. *g*
egregious.. seriously… there have always been bribes .. I know that.
But when did this lobby corruption thing explode to the mess it is today…
When did lobbying firms come into existence? I can understand the widget manufacturers association metting with congress critters… but we are talking a whole other level.
What do these lobbyist… aside from playing golf … actually DO for their fees?
gittin the congress to po-leece its ownself is kindly lack my mama sendin me to git a switch fer my own whuppin. ye kin bet twernt no hickry.
them rubberstamplicans is the best ever at deecepshun, pertendin to do jes a nuff till folks quits watchin em.
Thanks for the Shocking Truth
I am a devoted TRexoid.
I pray that Kod will allow more.
Awaiting input.
Redd.. OK that helps.. but can you put this into a date context… 80s 90s..???
The idea of agitating or informing a congresscritter about an interest is not necessarily a bad thing.
It’s the imbalance of power for one thing. For another, it’s the so-thin-as-to-be-almost-non-existent wall between who lobbies and who makes legislation. The line between advocating to Congress for a particular cause and peddling influence via gifts, money and so on, is getting crossed on an alarming basis.
Has anyone done a complete expose of the history of “lobbying” congress as an institution (could it be called this hahhaah?)
I used to work at a federal agency, and guess how much we could get from policy holders as gifts? $0. Even if they brought in cookies, we had to share it with the whole staff.
And this excuse of how little the congress critters earn!
WTF.
Linda Schrenko is near and dear to our hearts here in Atlanta.
“…Well, Linda Schrenko (R - of course) looked like a million bucks when she entered the federal court house in Atlanta this week (11.20.04). Actually, wearing her fur-trimmed jacket and sporting a face-lift, you might say Schrenko looked like $614,000 bucks. That’s the amount of money she is charged with embezzling from federal and education funds while she served as the Superintendent of Georgia schools.”
http://www.buzzflash.com/edito.....04086.html
Half of the money went to here failed 2002 nomination for Governor, says U.S. attorney Sally Yates.
If Georgia wasn’t ranked 50th in Public Education, I wouldn’t be so pissed.
cathy @ #5,
Madsen’s list is pretty stunning. What a set of family values politicians!
Oh yeah. Linda Schrenko plead guilty in May.
“…Former State School Superintendent Linda Schrenko pleaded guilty this morning to defrauding the government and money laundering.
She has been sentenced to eight years in prison and is waiving her right to appeal. She faced a maximum 25 years on the charges.”
http://www.ajc.com/metro/conte.....leads.html
please forgive the repeat OT - but tomorrow there will be a hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee on “Presidential Signing Statements”
http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=1969
when the Senate Judiciary Committee had a hearing on the Senator Feingold’s censure resolution (wrt NSA warrentless wiretapping) in march, most of the dem senators didn’t even show up.
if you want to call your senators (D&R) to tell them how important it is for them to defend the constitution, here is the list of senators on the Judiciary Committee:
http://judiciary.senate.gov/members.cfm
we need some more citizen lobbying!
Is there an historian in the house? One who can put the gilded age side by side with now and make a comparison?
This is looking so much like the gilded age that I am again becoming a Toynbee, Sorokin and Pareto fan. Is this just part of a gigantic historical cycle? Are we doomed to repete it over and over again?
Mornin’ all. The weird (hah) thing is that no one other than those in the blogosphere seem to really care, or are pretending (hah) to be so obtuse that they really don’t “get” it. “Analysis” on TV and radio is so childlike, the push-back from our dem Senators (they like all that money I guess) seems so half hearted, that I feel like I went to sleep and woke up in doofus world.
Samurai Sam says…
The line between advocating to Congress for a particular cause and peddling influence via gifts, money and so on, is getting crossed on an alarming basis.
IMO…. use of the word “alarming” is way too mild.
In that subversion of the constitution is obvious…
It should be framed as treason.
Morning, all!
Christy, don’t forget The Honorable John Doolittle here in Cali, currently playing Goliath to Charlie Brown’s David, but also under investigation as a member of the “Jack Who?” crowd.
OT, with apologies. But kinda related, since sham issues are what the Senate chooses to tackle right now, gr-r-r.
[Just signed on, & look fwd to reading this terrific post & comments! WaHoo Go Gettum Christy & firepups!]
Just got an alert from ACLU that the Senate, in all its wisdom, is trying to force thru the “Flag Amendment” yet again, ASAP.
ACLU urges calling our senators immediately if not sooner.
In case it’ll help, below is a copy of my “talking points” I just e-mailed to OH’s Senators [harumph!]:
———————–
” Please vote “no” on the Flag Amendment.
“Why does the Senate waste time on a sham issue like this, when it should be exercising more oversight of the Executive branch of the government?
“Waging a pre-emptive war, based on lies.
Attaching “signing statements” to over 750 laws.
Engaging in warrantless spying.
“Please urge Senate leadership to pick a REAL issue, and tackle it head-on.”
Close the bold, please!
eek. i did not have my “bold” setting on. what happened? sorry……….
Ah, thanks. selise, thanks for the reminder. Those signing statements are a slap in the face to the American people and the Constitution, every time he does one.
Republicans are so sure that they will stay in power, they won’t even pass pretend legislation. Whatever they pass, a Bush signing statement could negate it. It’s all for show yet they won’t even bother. The plunder take must be amazing.
Bold off
Contrary to some reports, Duke Cunningham has done next to nothing in terms of cooperating with the Justice Dept. on providing information on others involved in the ever widening ‘pay for play’ fraud. Why did the Justice Dept. request sentencing so soon after the Duke was convicted? Did they even attempt to ‘turn’ him? It doesn’t appear to be the case and I would really like to know if Abu Gonzales had a hand in that?
As for Jack Abramhoff he is apparently doing all he can to get some time knocked off his sentence and some cash knocked off his fine when his sentencing date arrives. Nice to see that Jack ratted out Grover Norquist and his money laundering operation. While Norquist isn’t in any criminal jeporady for funneling money for Jack; the tax-exempt status of Norquist’s non-profit organization, Americans For Tax Reform, should certainly be in the cross-hairs of the IRS. Is the IRS in the hip pocket of Bush Administration or will they act on this blatant abuse of a 503(c)?
Wouldn’t it be great if all those fat cat GOP donors to Norquist’s ATR got a notice from the IRS that their donations are not tax deductible and that they need to file amended tax returns and get their checkbooks out to add to the coffers of the US Treasury? It’s probably a ‘Blue Moon’ type scenario but hey, a guy can dream can’t he?
Morning all. Heads up– the Democratic Policy Committee’s hearing on the ultimate corruption is scheduled for 130 pm on CSPAN3.
01:30 PM EDT
2:00 (est.) LIVE
Use of Pre-War Intelligence
Senate Democratic Policy Committee
Harry Reid , D-NV
Byron L. Dorgan , D-ND
test
Did I start this bold thing with my 27
If so…sorry… how can I stop it?
Sophistic at 25 — Yes, the gilded age does seem to be repeating itself, but in a different spiral of the universe. I have seen the parallels (Evil ones? sorry EPU.) My one hope has been that after all the excesses of the Gilded Age/Robber Barons, we had all the reforms of the early 20th Century — Anti-trust legislation and all that. Who will be our new Teddy Roosevelt?
First, heartfelt condolences to Jane and her sister Pam and family.
**************
Also this week, Frist is calling up the Flag Amendment. The Republicans are in full-court press on diversion issues.
Why can’t the Democrats say, enough monkey business. This is the people’s business we should be talking about…and then use the debate time to talk about corruption and lobbying reform, corruption in war profiteering, and just general corruption, corruption, corruption by the Republican leadership. And they can alternate that with hammering home their true support of the troops by bringing them home as the Dems and General Casey want to do.
And when the vote is called, instead of allowing Republicans to frame the vote, Democrats should all vote “Present.”
Present to tend to the people’s business, not monkey business.
Hell, I’d put chimps in the gallery…the Republicans want to run stunts on the floor of the Senate…well, Dems, get creative, run stunts of your own.
Howard Beale at 35 — I heard, and this is strictly rumor mill in terms of back-up sourcing because I haven’t been able to verify it as yet, but I heard that Cunningham was threatened with having his plea deal revoked if he didn’t start spilling as he agreed to do. And that had an immediate impact on his cooperation. I’ve been trying to find out where this is going to go, though, through the public corruption unit at DoJ — I’ve been hearing rumbles and rumors that Alice Fisher (former DeLay staffer and pal) has been, shall we say, less than enthusiastic about pressing investigations on power players in the GOP. Have been trying to work on this story from a couple of angles — and if anyone knows anything on this, and is willing to talk, e-mail me at ReddHedd at AOL dot com. Nothing pisses me off more than playing politics with a criminal investigation — I don’t care what party someone is in…that something would be glossed over because a political playa gets put in charge would seriously piss me off.
DefJef at 8 says, “How did lobbying become the evil that it is in my mind?”
“The idea of agitating or informing a congresscritter about an interest is not necessarily a bad thing. One would think people who have expertise do help congresscritters understand complex issues.”
One word. Money. Lobbying is legal bribery. The solution is to allow lobbyists to provide only ONE thing to reps and senators: words. No money, ever, in any way.
I fixed the bold — refresh your browsers and it ought to be fixed for everyone. There was an open HTML tag.
DefJef -
Lobbyists are folks who are paid by groups of like-minded people to bring their concerns to the attention of the Powers-That-Be in DC, both in Congress and in the executive branch. Nothing exactly sinister about that - it’s what the First Amendment refers to as the right “to petition the Government for the redress of grievances.”
Most focus on a single issue (or group of issues) which they delve into in great depth. Reputable lobbyists can serve a public good, by providing needed advice and research to those in the government who do not necessarily have the depth of experience in dealing with a particular issue. They can suggest legislation to Congress or regulations to the Executive branch, or speak against proposals offered by others that they view as harmful. Again, nothing sinister here.
Disreputable lobbyists, on the other hand, attempt to petition the government not for the public good, but for the private gain of a few. Steer the contract in this direction so my friends can benefit, or issue that regulation to screw my competition. Little items get inserted into bills at the last minute, often with no fingerprints attached, and no one is the wiser until someone who got screwed screams - and until someone in the media picks up on it.
What’s the difference between the two?
That’s simple: <snark> Everybody loves their lobbyists - it’s all those pesky “special interest groups” that cause all the trouble. </snark>
More seriously, the difference is often where their work takes place. Lobbyists work where they can be seen by all; “special interests” work in the shadows and behind the scenes, where they hope no one will notice.
sofistic @25 -
Yes, it is a lot like the gilded age, and it’s going to be even more obvious once more of these Abramoff trials get under way. K Street feeds the new robber barons, and its starting to get noticed.
If you really want to see the dark underbelly of the K Street beast, let’s elect a Democratic Congress that takes its oversight responsibilities seriously and is willing to conduct hearings on government contracting, regulations, the revolving door of government officials taking jobs in the companies they regulated, etc.
Just of the phone with Sen. Stevens’s office and Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation office. Apparently, there’s a meeting going on with Stevens’s and Inouye’s chiefs of staff and the staff of the committee. Supposedly, thy’ll get back to me when it is adjourned…….
Christy or Moderator
IMO…the 41 comment/link is a security concern
Yes or No?
Larry — it’s been deleted. Refresh your browser. And folks, we will not tolerate spamming of insta-chat links to who knows what sorts of open chat rooms. They will be deleted immediately upon notice — and you will be banned if you continue to spam them. FYI. Move on to a less-patrolled forum.
To everything, there is a season. Damn! Why do the lyrics and melody of that Byrds tune keep running through my head?
follow on answer to DefJef at 8 - the root of it (IMO) is the cost of campaigning. While it’s certainly the case that corrupt politicians have plenty of reasons to be on the take besides an expensive election campaign. The high cost of election slants the odds in favor of those who have a well-oiled money producing system. And unfortunately, that means that corrupt, paid-for politicians have a natural advantage versus those who believe in representing the voters in their districts. Without the high cost of elections, challengers would be able to compete on an equal footing and make the currupted-behavior an issue for the election…
Damn sofistic at 48 — now it’s running through my head, too. *g* Time to browse through the CD collection and find something to drown it out…maybe some Kansas this morning. For some reason, I’m in a “Wayward Son” kinda mood today…
Yeah, I know the biblical reference. But it’s the damn tune that won’t go away. (bet you are all hearing that tune now, aren’t you?) Usually it is interspersed with a voice that says “we’re gonna get even with a vengeance.”
Sorry for the OT.
Christy 41 - I remember reading a published article on Cunningham’s lack of cooperation. I believe it was the CA USA office (??) that had someone specifically saying that he was not being cooperative? You may already have that story, but if not, it may give some reference points.
I have no idea whether Cunningham has suddenly been more forthcoming (btw - wasn’t that Fisher in the Gonzales presser on the Miami 7?) but I remember the tenor of the article was that the prosecutor(s) were pissed off. But that Cunningham sounded like he was running a little scared and that his sentence, even with his plea, was likely to put him away for long enough that he might have lost interest in cooperation (all of this last sentence being my impression - not fact).
OT,
but I thought that was Lord Kos in my head
sophistic & Gnome de Plume - wrt to the gilded age. good talk by krugman (with amy goodman, greg palast and randi rhodes) a couple of weeks ago. krugman’s talk, “The New Class War in America”, drew many parallels to today. he argued that the polarization of incomes is bad for our society, and not just for social justice, but also because it undermines the trust we have in each other (because we don’t believe we’re all in the same boat), increases corruption and feeds a political process that depends on the exploitation of cultural divisions, polarization & nastiness.
http://nysoundposse.com/2006/0.....61306.html
krugman said we need a new FDR, but palast countered that “the people, the uprising of the public from 1927 onward - created the New Deal. It is the new deal that created Franklin Roosevelt, not that Franklin Roosevelt created the New Deal. We don’t need another FDR, we need another movement, another movement that creates a New Deal and the leader will finally step out from behind us.”
thought that was very ROOTZ sounding. ;-)
What will be interesting is what will happen when there is a Democratic majority (forget “if” - we’re going with “when!”) and all of a sudden the lobbyists are lining up to court Democrats who now have the power to set a legislative agenda and affect the interests of corporations. Will the Dems hold to their commitment to clean things up, or will they - or at least some of them - be seduced by the gilded carrots being dangled in front of their noses?
With representative government, we have to have an ability to petition to be heard - the problem is in getting legislators to appreciate that the interests of individuals should be accorded the same status as the interests of the big-bucks corporations, and that has not been the case for a long, long time. An individual who asks for the congressperson’s vote on a particular issue has much less to offer in return. What’s one individual’s one vote and minimal donation as thanks measured against the possibility of oodles of campaign cash, power and influence?
The right to petition the government has morphed into a quid pro quo that perverts and possibly thwarts what that concept was originally intended to do.
OT, but hilarious. This from Time Magazine’s upcoming spotlight on Lamont vs Lieberman:
“Even so, the attacks on the kiss became so vocal that an exasperated Lieberman told one group of Democrats “I didn’t kiss him back,” a response that didn’t exactly hearten them. (The incident has become so radioactive that Lieberman now denies Bush actually kissed him, telling TIME last week “I don’t think he kissed me, he leaned over and gave me a hug and said �thank you for being a patriotic American.”)”
http://www.time.com/time/magaz.....83,00.html
Christy & sofistic.
Bunch-a 60’s-era tunes been floating thru my mind for ’bout 6 yrs now, & I was [too busy student-ing to protest back then], sigh. Well. I’ve got time now! ;->
Inextricably linked to an unprecedented reign of bribery, influence peddling and dirty deals in Congress, in the White House, in state houses and on K Street, the Republican Party has protected its wrongdoers by blocking investigations, denying access to records and even politicizing the definition of crime itself.
For more on the ethical woes of a laundry list of Banana Republicans, see:
“The Republican Rap Sheet.”
“I didn’t kiss him back” - that made me laugh out loud - just grateful not to have had a mouthful of Diet Dr. Pepper at the time!
Thank you, Ed*ward Teller!
I don’t know if this is the article I saw or not, but it’s about what I remembered.
From early May?
http://www.nctimes.com/article.....5_9_06.txt
By: MARK WALKER - Staff Writer
Rick Gwin, special agent in charge of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service’s western regional office, said he is troubled by the lack of assistance, particularly in light of Cunningham’s plea agreement that calls for him to tell all that he knows.
“In my opinion, he has not been cooperative and I have not gotten any information from him to further develop other targets,” Gwin said in a telephone interview from his office in Mission Viejo. “I was hoping that from a jail cell, he might become more cooperative, but we just don’t have the cooperation that I think we should have.”
. . .
“This is much bigger and wider than just Randy ‘Duke’ Cunningham,” he said. “All that has just not come out yet, but it won’t be much longer and then you will know just how widespread this is.”
Just remember to ask Kos before you go much further.
OK, Christy, if you are going to do Kansas, try substituting “All they are is dust in the wind.” And you know who “they” are.
I didn’t kiss him back
A campaign slogan if ever there was one. If nothing else, it will get the 5th grade recess vote.
Mary, I remember asking Christy around that time if Cunningham’s deal could be yanked if he failed to cooperate, and I think it may have been an article like the one you cited that prompted it.
There was a feeling that Cunningham was in such poor health that whether he ended up with more than eight years, it might be moot as he might not even survive the shortened term he received as a result of the deal.
I would think that when the person who made the deal is likely sitting on tons of info that can implicate others, you don’t go easy on him for not cooperating just because his health isn’t great.
sofistic @ 25 - I’m no historian, but I just received a book on the history of the house…The House by Robert Remini - maybe it will have something in it. A comparison might be fun to research, at least.
Now, let me find my spare time….Hehe
Speaking of Kansas…from abc breaking news, SUPREME COURT RULES, 5-4, KANSAS DEATH PENALTY LAW DOES NOT BREACH CONSTITUTIONAL BAN ON CRUEL & UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT”
No link yet.
I’m damned surprised the vote was that close.
Anne 64
I think its pretty much a given that even though the Dukes in jail its primarily for the protection of the repugs and his own safety.
Lewis will be there soon.
Hey Mary,
Belated response to your comment in the OFG/OKC thread, but perfectly on-topic here: yeah, Conrad Black would fit right in with this crowd. Crooked cash, lies and obfuscation, self-righteous indignation that anyone is impugning his sterling character. If he escapes conviction, it wouldn’t surprise me at all if he ran for office.
TRex -
Here’s the WaPo
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....00410.html
Also, they struck down a VT campaign finance law, but did so with six separate opinions. See http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....00407.html
for the details.
It’s that time again, folks. Summer vacation is almost here for the Supremes, and all those end-of-the-term opinions are on their way.
Detainees at Gitmo is one of the big ones yet to come down . . .
Should be T-, not TRex.
Preview is my friend . . .
Apologies to both.
But… but Cynthia McKinney hit a security guard! And Harry Reid got free seats to a fight! And… and Abramoff’s clients gave money to Democrats! It’s a bipartisan problem! (Okay, there was Jefferson & Mollohan - I would have liked to see the Dems move faster to disown them)
“I didn’t kiss him back,” a response that didn’t exactly hearten them.
He didn’t inhale?
DanD is spot on about the cost of campaigning. Unless you’re rich enough to self-fund, it’s currently impossible to mount a campaign without either wealthy (i.e., corporate) backers, or help from the party establishment, neither of which are exactly friends of the progressive grassroots.
(I’m hoping a Lamont victory will change this - I’m not sure everyone realizes how hugely important that would be, beyond just CT)
Unless and until either netroot fundraising is big enough to compete with corporate fundraising, or campaign finance is fundamentally reformed to level the financial playing field (or make it less important), we will always have a surplus of pro-corporate politicians in *both* parties.
By the time I finish typing this, at least three other people will have said the exact same thing, but better.
Peterr,
Not into the Jamesons this morn are you?
Larry,
No, just trying to multitask: World Cup (Italy v Australia), FDL, and cooking breakfast for a cranky Kid.
fyi - Cunningham Cooperation -
soon after the statement from the investigator (2-3 days) there was a statement released that indeed the Dukester was ready to co operate, but I qualify it by saying it may have been released by his atty, but it was not refuted by DOJ
see if I can find it over at TPM muck
Peterr,
Cranky one ….how old?
Don’t forget the Republican way to invest: buy land, use earmarks to build a highway or freeway exchange near it, and then sell it and pocket the profit. Denny Hastert can provide details.
Nice culture of life that Scalito supports, huh?
VOTE LEIBERMAN:
Because he didn’t kiss him back.
And the groping was accidental.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
L/CA - While “Lord Black” fits right in with the themes of Prince of Darkness Perle and Darth Cheney and the Dark Side, I guess from a citizenship basis he can’t run here. The Constitution didn’t adopt the, “citizen of country where you spawned your evil progeny” rule. Although it’s ez, looking at Washington, to think otherwise.
One partial solution is to have term limits and get rid of the power of encumbancy. We would have a new congress every few years. Two terms seems long enough.
Another measure would a real closing of the revolving door. You cannot work in an industry you “regulated” in congress or the reverse. Not just limited on time… absolute firewall.
And of course, no gifts whatsover - NONE… no meals, nothing…nada.
Public finance of elections would certainly do some great things and “level” the playing field. If only…
Four, and cranky because the municipal swimming pool is closed today (his promised swimming day).
I’m sure its Abramoff’s fault somehow. Or the lobbyists for the Municipal Natatorium Association of America.
Lotsa things stalling on the Hill, including some that should:
Raw Story
FLAG BURNING AMENDMENT WON’T PASS
THE SENATE, AIDES SAY…. DEVELOPING…
US drops Patriot Act request for library records: Soon…
History of Corruption -
wouldn’t be surprised if Public Citizen had some materials of interest
and there’e always C.R.E.W.
(can’t find link - google - the house that jack built
www.publiccitizen.org
Susan Collins apparently scares easily. From the WaPo article in Christy’s post:
Yeah, I was afraid Congress might actually act on substantive lobbying too. Fortunately, saner heads prevailed and we got back to protecting marriage and all that.
Ludicrous. That about sums it up, all right. (And does the Senate really want someone who scares this easily to head up the Homeland Security committee?)
Reformaphobia. Blech!
Christy –
Is it possible that a former DeLay staffer like Alice Fisher is clean? How much leeway would a DoJ Attorney have, to start asking questions and pulling threads that lead to her Fisherness?
TRex keeps the gag in, until he gets used to the frickin’ *la-ser* mounted on his *cra-nium* (those are words you grunions er, minions might learn in evil trial litigation school…In Rangoon)…And my Paraguayan factory has the latest set of compliance implants now ready for installation… Prepare to be shorn (prolonged evil laugh)
;>)
Peterr @ 44
I understand the principle behind lobbying. But of course lobbying is NEVER in the public’s interest unless that interest aligns with the interest of who the lobbyist is advocating for.
So if the auto industry lobbies against seat belts… which they did.. it was to save them money (so they thought)… and this was clearly NOT in the public’s interest.
From my limited understanding it has gotten to the point where special interest lobbyists actually write the legislation… and it is introduced by a congresscritter. This should be unlawful as well.
The constiuency of many in congress is some special interest and in the case of the repukes… biz in general, or wealth people.. not ALL the people.
But of course congresscritters are advocates for the “special interests” of their own constituents… famers, fisherman, facotry workers… whatever.
A short but good overview of the Gilded Age robber barons is Strangely Like War:The Global Assualt on Forests,by Derrick Jensen and George Draffan.If you can find it,their book Railroads and Clearcuts is another good one.I think there’s a website for the Railroads and Clearcuts book,I’ll have to check.
Lots of dirty deals,bribes,and outright theft,along with murder,madness and mayhem.
The big difference now is the amounts of money being stolen and appropriated into the hands of a few.Plus,today it’s lots easier to hide stuff in other countries with a global economy and everything being handled by computers these days.
We’ve got a catch-22 here with all this corruption.The corrupt people are the ones who decide the rules and make the laws.Until you take the profit out of politics this problem will never stop.
Been off doing some searching for databases with lists of indictments of at least congress members. A lot of spotty stuff from different watch groups, but no real database so far. There must be some political scientist out there who keeps track of this stuff. Just haven’t found it yet. Will keep looking… I would like to see a list of both federal and state legislators who have been indicted, the nature of the indictment, the disposition of it, and the outcome, along with the party affiliation, a bunch of demographics and a time horizon of at least ten years. Still looking, will report back.
OT — I found the very definition of “lame” in Salon this morning:
So…apparently Ingraham is a comedienne? Who knew?
Or is this yet another example of the right not getting it, that TDS is truth dressed as pure snark?
Joe Lieberman: he didn’t kiss Bush back, and there was NO tongue action.
(I keep thinking about the Seinfeld episode where George gets a massage and freaks out later because he thinks “it moved.”
DefJef 85
Friend on the hill confirmrd to me several years ago that the lobbyists routinely write legislation.
makes one sick…yes?
Though we gotta say hello, with each phone call,
Darling I promise you this
Your intercepted calls and your emails -
UnSealed with a kiss
http://www.salon.com/news/feat.....index.html
CA Court unseals EFF doc with expert review of ATT ‘backrooms’
Mary:
Lieberman has a mandate. Just not that kind.
I guess Conrad will have to run in Canada; he might be a Schwarzenegger-type candidate if enough voters like him.
OT, but Internet-related coolness: Increasing numbers of homeless people are going online.
Fox is reportedly making a pilot for what a source tells TVNewswer is “an absolutely terrible rip-off of ‘The Daily Show.’” To be called “Watch This Right Now,” the news spoof show is going to be hosted by conservative talk show pundit Laura Ingraham.
Not Nancy Grace? I thought that gag with the lacrosse stats was pretty edgy and wacky.
I am so glad that Joementum has cleared up that tongue reciprocity issue.
Sounded so french to me.
Another OT definition of “lame” may be had over at Glenn’s place, re Zengerle’s now-Red-faced supporters.
Deelish.
P.S. Isn’t Conrad Black a British subject now? Renounced his Canadian citizenship to become Lord Black, didn’t he?
I’m sure all kinds of journalists busted a gut laughing at her cute remarks about balconies in the green zone. Although that might not have been laughter that busted her gut.
As long as she’s doing her show from Ramadi and working in the good news, I’m all for it.
Larry:
Freedom Frenching? Liberty Lip-Lock? Governating requires sacrifice, I tell ya.
DefJef 84
But here’s the problem: Suppose a lobbyist see a problem that needs addressing. They go to a congresscritter, make their case, and the CC agrees. What now? The CC says “Write something up that solves this, and we’ll try to make it happen.”
Members of Congress need experts to help with crafting legislation. If you’re going to pass a law dealing with EPA and clean water, you’re going to need some chemists, for instance, and I don’t see a whole lot of them among the 535 members.
You can’t ban outsiders from suggesting the wording for legislation. And, I believe, we don’t really want to either. What we want is transparency in the process, so we can see what is being proposed and by whom WHILE the debate is still under way and not after the bill is signed. Which experts are providing the analysis? Who benefits from their work?
I’d love to see an end to the practice of sticking little items in during conference committee meetings that have no names attached.
Transparency and Accountability.
You can’t have the second without the first.
Peterr,
Agreed and very well put!
Time to recruit The Daily Show to network….intact. No tact. Any way at all. It’s America’s only reality check…oh, except for M. Colbert.
As for The Kiss…No Mo’, Joe! No Mojoe…
DefJef and Larry -
one of the cogs in the Permanent Republican Majority machinery is something called
ALEC - it’s another so-called think tank and it’s primary purpose is to write legistlation/ for goopers everywhere - a virtual drive up policy window
until I’d heard of it and what it did, I’d often wondered how some of these 1st string dumb asses (think SD’s Rapist Bill of Rights)ever in fact put together legistlation
www.alec.org/
Yes Connie is now a Brit, thanks to Jean Chretien, who, bless his vindictive little heart, didn’t want to watch Connie pat himself on the back, without a least getting a kick in the pants first.
Chretien passed some sort of last-minute stipulation that Canadian citizens cannot be members of the british ‘laureate’.
Connie, despite his Maurice Duplessis worship, quickly renounced Canadian citizen ship.
…this is the same ‘Jean Chretien’ that had cabinet members calling the shrub a ‘moron’, and who Bush was gulled into calling ‘Jean Poutine’.
Mandates in the Political Capitol.
That DC lingo throws me every time.
I didn’t realize he had to giveup his CN citizenship to get his title. OTOH, he really should think about America. Over here we can still make someone king. It might be against the law, but the lawyers aren’t against it.
He should look at how nicely things have worked out for Rove and consider it at least.
The ‘Jean Poutine’ gaff is available here as appeared in associated press during shrubs first presidential run.
http://www.dewit.ca/archs/poutine/index.html
Oh Maaaa-ry. Something I wish you‘d consider is that guest post you were trying to talk Matt O. into concocting last night, tracking Ashcroft through his machinations . . .
Wouldn’t you enjoy that? WE would.
Eric Boehlert has a post at MyDD — Newsweek Makes My Head Hurt
http://www.mydd.com/story/2006.....5#readmore