<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net Neutrality:  Crunch Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:50:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zedaker</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-155396</link>
		<dc:creator>zedaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-155396</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i’m confused. do we want to kill s.2917 in committee or register support for it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“This is not a given, not by a longshot, but if we can kill this bill in Committee, that’s a fantastic outcome for us.”–Christy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;or&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“UPDATE #2:  Per reader lotus (should have spelled this out clearly, sorry!) %u2014 you are FOR S. 2917, WITHOUT AMENDMENT (the Snowe/Dorgan bill).”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;doesn’t a vote “for” get it OUT of committee?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hmm, preview shows some garbage characters from the copy/paste that edit doesn’t show…sorry i don’t know how to fix them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i’m confused. do we want to kill s.2917 in committee or register support for it?</p>
<p>“This is not a given, not by a longshot, but if we can kill this bill in Committee, that’s a fantastic outcome for us.”–Christy</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>“UPDATE #2:  Per reader lotus (should have spelled this out clearly, sorry!) %u2014 you are FOR S. 2917, WITHOUT AMENDMENT (the Snowe/Dorgan bill).”</p>
<p>doesn’t a vote “for” get it OUT of committee?</p>
<p>hmm, preview shows some garbage characters from the copy/paste that edit doesn’t show…sorry i don’t know how to fix them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-155143</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-155143</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It’s the end of the internet as we know it… and I don’t feel fine.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s the end of the internet as we know it… and I don’t feel fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ouachitawoman</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-154718</link>
		<dc:creator>ouachitawoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 01:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-154718</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i contacted mark pryor for arkansas but don’t yet know what he will do.  i know today he voted to “stay the course” in iraq.  boo to him. usualy he is a bright fellow.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i contacted mark pryor for arkansas but don’t yet know what he will do.  i know today he voted to “stay the course” in iraq.  boo to him. usualy he is a bright fellow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-154427</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-154427</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Norm Coleman is a No on this issue&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norm Coleman is a No on this issue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-154067</link>
		<dc:creator>Adie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-154067</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ohmygosh.  Just noticed about Jane’s mom!  So sad.  Our hearts got out to you, Jane, and your family.  We just ache for you.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohmygosh.  Just noticed about Jane’s mom!  So sad.  Our hearts got out to you, Jane, and your family.  We just ache for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adie</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-154057</link>
		<dc:creator>Adie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-154057</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just finished e-mailing all the Dem. Senators, as well as a bunch of Repubs. (our 2 from OH - joy, plus any else that struck my crazybone for one reason or another; eg., Frist thinking he wants to be preznit, those mentioned by Christie, some fence-sitters; does Joementum count?).  Thanks, all, for the great posts — helped a lot to help me piece something together.  Below is what I sent to most, in case it might give s’more ideas. Then I’m gonna rest me weary fingers.&lt;br /&gt;
——————————&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Senator _______:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I urge you to support Net Neutrality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please vote FOR S-2917 (Snowe-Dorgan), WITHOUT AMENDMENT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Net neutrality is vital to free speech, equal access, university research, and the growth and competitiveness of small businesses, just to mention a few aspects of American life that depend upon the maintenance of free and open access to the internet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The only way to operate the internet properly is as a public service, like electricity, or a library.&lt;br /&gt;
It is critically important that the internet remain free from corporate control or manipulation.&lt;br /&gt;
Phone companies should NOT be allowed to discriminate depending on who is calling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please support the American electorate by voting FOR net neutrality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please vote FOR S-2917 (Snowe-Dorgan) WITHOUT AMENDMENT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;br /&gt;
Sincerely,&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished e-mailing all the Dem. Senators, as well as a bunch of Repubs. (our 2 from OH &#8211; joy, plus any else that struck my crazybone for one reason or another; eg., Frist thinking he wants to be preznit, those mentioned by Christie, some fence-sitters; does Joementum count?).  Thanks, all, for the great posts — helped a lot to help me piece something together.  Below is what I sent to most, in case it might give s’more ideas. Then I’m gonna rest me weary fingers.<br />
——————————<br />
Dear Senator _______:</p>
<p>I urge you to support Net Neutrality.</p>
<p>Please vote FOR S-2917 (Snowe-Dorgan), WITHOUT AMENDMENT.</p>
<p>Net neutrality is vital to free speech, equal access, university research, and the growth and competitiveness of small businesses, just to mention a few aspects of American life that depend upon the maintenance of free and open access to the internet.</p>
<p>The only way to operate the internet properly is as a public service, like electricity, or a library.<br />
It is critically important that the internet remain free from corporate control or manipulation.<br />
Phone companies should NOT be allowed to discriminate depending on who is calling.</p>
<p>Please support the American electorate by voting FOR net neutrality.</p>
<p>Please vote FOR S-2917 (Snowe-Dorgan) WITHOUT AMENDMENT.</p>
<p>Thank you.<br />
Sincerely,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caitlin</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-154056</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-154056</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you! Is there anywhere I can find a summary of what exactly is in the bill?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you! Is there anywhere I can find a summary of what exactly is in the bill?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brownandserve</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-154051</link>
		<dc:creator>brownandserve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-154051</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ted Stevens’ amendment needs to be killed - not the bill as written.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted Stevens’ amendment needs to be killed &#8211; not the bill as written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caitlin</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-153968</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-153968</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don’t understand. We’re one vote shy of killing a Ted Stevens bill in committee? I thought the goal was to get a majority of the Senate Commerce Committee to vote for the Snowe-Dorgan bill so it *wouldn’t* die in committee?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t understand. We’re one vote shy of killing a Ted Stevens bill in committee? I thought the goal was to get a majority of the Senate Commerce Committee to vote for the Snowe-Dorgan bill so it *wouldn’t* die in committee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weeder</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-153807</link>
		<dc:creator>weeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/22/net-neutrality-crunch-time/#comment-153807</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;nostrafarious,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Josh at tpm is mentioning senators as they come out in support of NN.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nostrafarious,</p>
<p>Josh at tpm is mentioning senators as they come out in support of NN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.251 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-16 22:51:58 -->

