Comments on: Another Endorsement for Ned Lamont http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/ Firedoglake weblog Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:45:30 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: lambert strether http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149681 lambert strether Tue, 20 Jun 2006 00:16:49 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149681 <p>I tried to get ‘ “Ho” Lieberman ‘ propagating awhile back, just as a friendly nickname, you understand, but with this running-as-an-independent nonsense, it seems more and more appropriate… Once again, the Republicans lower the bar!</p> I tried to get ‘ “Ho” Lieberman ‘ propagating awhile back, just as a friendly nickname, you understand, but with this running-as-an-independent nonsense, it seems more and more appropriate… Once again, the Republicans lower the bar!

]]> By: Boudica http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149630 Boudica Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:39:05 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149630 <p>Joe now knows he’s in BIG trouble with Connecticut voters. It seems to have come as quite a surprise to him. I wonder if it has crossed his mind that as he has misread the strength of opposition to his candidacy, perhaps he has also misjudged what is in the best interest of this nation? It’s time for him to do some sould searching about how he has gotten things so wrong. Until he gets a clue it’s not a good idea to return him to the Senate.</p> Joe now knows he’s in BIG trouble with Connecticut voters. It seems to have come as quite a surprise to him. I wonder if it has crossed his mind that as he has misread the strength of opposition to his candidacy, perhaps he has also misjudged what is in the best interest of this nation? It’s time for him to do some sould searching about how he has gotten things so wrong. Until he gets a clue it’s not a good idea to return him to the Senate.

]]> By: Kelly A. Greene http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149628 Kelly A. Greene Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:38:50 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149628 <p>Lovely picture. Only problem, that is not Connecticut in the background. Nutmeggers know the highest elevation is about 1400 feet. Get them in front of the Connecticut River or a buoy on the Sound and they and he will be all set.</p> Lovely picture. Only problem, that is not Connecticut in the background. Nutmeggers know the highest elevation is about 1400 feet. Get them in front of the Connecticut River or a buoy on the Sound and they and he will be all set.

]]> By: punaise http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149560 punaise Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:16:35 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149560 <p>beat L.A.! beat L.A.!</p> beat L.A.! beat L.A.!

]]> By: Dover Bitch http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149525 Dover Bitch Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:47:13 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149525 <p>Yeah, but Magowan gave the max $2000 to Bush and did not support Kerry. The big point though is that the Giants fans have hated the Dodgers since not long after the Civil War! :)</p> Yeah, but Magowan gave the max $2000 to Bush and did not support Kerry. The big point though is that the Giants fans have hated the Dodgers since not long after the Civil War! :)

]]> By: Peterr http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149519 Peterr Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:44:28 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149519 <p>Dover Bitch</p> <p>Wasn’t aware of McCort’s giving, but going by LaSorda and Scully. As for Peter McGowan, he spreads the wealth around - gotta keep both sides happy, in the grand corporate lobbying tradition.</p> Dover Bitch

Wasn’t aware of McCort’s giving, but going by LaSorda and Scully. As for Peter McGowan, he spreads the wealth around – gotta keep both sides happy, in the grand corporate lobbying tradition.

]]> By: Dover Bitch http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149511 Dover Bitch Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:40:39 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149511 <p>Peterr,</p> <p>You’re wrong about the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/2004-campaign-mlb.htm">Dodgers and Giants</a>. Giants owner gave more money to the GOP than the Dems. On the other hand Dodgers owner McCourt gave 100% of his contributions to Dems.</p> Peterr,

You’re wrong about the Dodgers and Giants. Giants owner gave more money to the GOP than the Dems. On the other hand Dodgers owner McCourt gave 100% of his contributions to Dems.

]]> By: GSD http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149508 GSD Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:39:44 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149508 <p>Texas Lady,</p> <p>Are you Kay Barely Hutchison?</p> <p>Say solong to Odious Joe.</p> <p>-GSD</p> Texas Lady,

Are you Kay Barely Hutchison?

Say solong to Odious Joe.

-GSD

]]> By: Peterr http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149499 Peterr Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:34:31 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149499 <p>No argument here on Bonds and BALCO . . . I’m a Cubbie fan, myself, and can’t stand either the Giants or the Dodgers.</p> <p>Gimmie Harry Carey, God rest his soul, broadcasting from the Wrigley Field bleachers on a sunny September day . . .</p> No argument here on Bonds and BALCO . . . I’m a Cubbie fan, myself, and can’t stand either the Giants or the Dodgers.

Gimmie Harry Carey, God rest his soul, broadcasting from the Wrigley Field bleachers on a sunny September day . . .

]]> By: schwa http://firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149485 schwa Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:28:44 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/06/19/another-endorsement-for-ned-lamont/#comment-149485 <p>I need some good news - how long ’til Lamont tops Lieberman in the polls?</p> I need some good news – how long ’til Lamont tops Lieberman in the polls?

]]>