Fitz!

While we’re Fitzing, let’s not forget BUCK FUSH!

Truly sickening display, even for Coulter.

Thanks for the great post Taylor

Why do Republicans keep fantasizing about gay marriage, and oral sex in the oval office?

And why do titillation-obsessed Democrats keep yammering on about Ann Coulter’s Adam’s Apple, as if anything about her sexuality has the slightest bearing on her political lunacy. Do you not see that your comments might be hurtful to someone who shares Coulter’s physical traits without sharing her juvenille politics? This kind of writing is as stupid as talking about John Bolton’s mustache. Grow up.

You betcha, Matt, as always, a pleasure to be sitting in at FDL.

Her real name is Arthur Coltrane from Georgia.

Look it up on Google.

The adams-apple may be a giveaway.

I love this one.

that there is no such thing as IQ,

And she would be exhibit A ?

Sorry, EPU’d myself from last thread.

115 looseheadprop says:

June 6th, 2006 at 3:20 pm

Peterr,
Chicago Rules. Thank you for reminding me.And anyone who lurks here, this has to played by Chicago Rules.

Rayne :

When Guliani was USA in NYC he brought a series of cases against Wallstreeters.Mostly insider trading cases. Haven’t seen the like until Dave Kelley ( a Guliani hire)brought back the tradition.

Many powerful people and powerful law firms objected and complained to the WH, but Rudy had too much public support and so the cases stuck. But appeals were filed.

When he left office, he tried to get a commitment about who would replace him as USA. Specifically, he wanted a commitment that no one would try to go back and dismiss the wall street cases after the fact.

He could not get it and was pressured for time b/c he wanted to run for mayor and could not fundraise while he was a Hatch Act employee.

When he left, the WH appointed a man who indirectly through a series of op ed pieces and public appearances by his law partners, campaigned for the job on a platform of abhoring the Wall Street prosecutions.

When th new USAe got the job, he had the appeals of these cases assigned to inexperienced brand new ASUA’s. Some of whom had never SEEN a Second Circuit brief before.

Many of them got killed by top notch appellate lawyers with years of experience. The newbies knew they were cannon fodder. It was horrible to watch.Normally, new ASUA’s are carefully trained and nurtured in the hope that good ones will make gov’t service their life’s work (or most of their super productive years).

You come to an office like SDNY all full of idealism, enthusiasm, and hope for bright shiney victories both for the good you can do for your country and for the good you can do for the ole’ resume.

These newbies became cycnical and burnt out overnight, seeing the once glorious “sovereign disrict of new york” sullied by politcs.

Many left before their 3 year commitment ended daring the incumbent USA to sue them. (which he couldn’t so, it’s a none binding commitment, a word of honor kind of thing, only they felt there was no reciprocal honor).

A lot of really good people left or were forced out of government service during Iran Contra. The stories were never really reported.

With Bushco 1 it was all about protecting their little club of rapaciuos insiders. With Bushco 2, it seems, it still is.

Never forget, Fitz lived thorugh all of this. Saw it first hand. he knows how ruthess these people can be.

So, yeah, there are a lot of ways this “former jurist” they want to appoint could tank the cases, the investigation, everything without leaving any fingerprints. Hell, he/she could go to trial and “lose” by taking a dive. like a fixed prize fight.

How it’s going to turn out, I have no idea. This is not the first time they have tried to get rid of him and he is still here. Maybe they will fail this time too.

This AM, I was scoffing at the WSJ article. Combined with the Levin thing, NOW it has my attention.

Maybe it’s an fey Irish thing, but I take it seriously when the hairs stand up on my neck. OK, OK so I am superstious.

It’s in the graphic Eli, not in the writing. If you’re going to criticize, at least aim at the right target. (Note: also see #63)

Wait a minute:

She actually thinks the AIDs virus DISCRIMINATES???

A virus? Can tell if you are what? gay? black? deserving of divine retribution???

WHATTTTTTT?

What the hell is wrong with making fun of John Bolton’s mustache?

-GSD

THAT’S PERFECT. Ann Coulter gets to play the Martha Mitchell part!!.. you know what they say about history… it doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhynme. I am now waiting for Cheney to resign.

personally,I think john Bolten’s mustache would look fabulous on Anne.

Coulter is a useless demagogue. Ignoring her is by far the best option. Lets focus on those who matter, not the bobble heads they send out to distract us.

and if the rumors are true, there’s no telling exactly where on Ann that Bolton mustache has been already !

Is she really a guy? I used to live in the Meat Packing District, NYC and she looks like the ladies I walked passed on my way home…
but they had better legs.
RG

Click on the link to chapter one of her book in my post and read a little. I swear she’s finally lost it.

When I get really, really, really bored I like to go on the blogs and watch people give a complete nitwit like Coulter all the attention she so richly doesn’t deserve.

I agree with Tlaloc at #14, it’s best to just ignore Coulter, she’s vapid, and she feeds on attention.

It’s like her time in the sun is waning and she won’t go with any measure of grace.

There’s nothing like hiding candy in the meat packing district, eh?

-GSD

Welcome back Taylor- I’m happy for you to see me. Looks as if Little Morphin Annie may be staring at some jail time eh?

I would substitute cloven hooves for clawed feet in the graphic above,but hey,that’s just me.

When she leaves a room,does anyone check for a bat flying away?

The mere fact she’s on TV is a symptom that those running the media are certifiably insane.I’m angry I even know who she is.

You nnow Taylor,
I thought her Today Show performance was odd. i think you are right, a hangover would explain it.

Usually she is quick with a response, but this AM she could not seem to focus or think at all.

Like she was in slo-mo

Taylor Marsh (at 17) said:
“Click on the link to chapter one of her book in my post and read a little. I swear she’s finally lost it.”

well…oookay. As long as it’s free.

What harm could it….k-k-GACK!…What IS this stuff?! Mental insecticide??

Sad truth: you can say just about anything and if you’ve got the audience and media-darling gig, you will be taken seriously. Especially if you are controversial, semi-attractive (sexually), and the viewers will be polarized: love you or hate you, whatever, they’ll tune in. Because that’s the game: Sell soap! Sell lots of sexy soap! Watch this stupid mouthy blonde bimbo say outragious things—it’s good TV!

We’ve over here in our bubble reading *books* of all things, writing pithy comments and essays on the Internet, and laughing at our sly snarking humor. While Walmart America tunes in to the Amazing Televised Circus. And buys that soap.

BTW, what a surprise that Ms. Coulter would include breast impants in the same group as AIDS, IQ, and nuclear power. Wow. Nice set, Ann.

Don’t miss Kathy Griffin’s comments later on the Today Show. (scroll up on C&L.) KG appeared with Al Rokker (I guess plugging her new Bravo show). Here’s KG from the transcript:
“I’d like to go after Ann Coulter, I saw that nut-bag on the show earlier. What’s she doing wearing a cocktail dress at seven in the morning. She got home from the party last night. Doesn’t she just make stuff up Al? Who fact checks? You can’t just let Ann Coulter…”

And *then* Rokker starts trying to interrupt Griffin, to get her to stop doing her number on Coulter. They cut Kathy Griffin off just as she said, “Can I go on the *real show* next time, Al?”

hee hee hee

I doubt if she’ll do any time as a result of her voting fraud. A simple low-grade felony conviction will revoke forever her law license … she’ll also be called “convicted felon Anne Coulter”…

Hey, RWCole – That would be too classic. She’s really unraveling in her new book. If you take a look at the one chapter offered it’s truly amazing what the wingnuts will publish.

Today, Matt Lauer actually fawned over her even after she slammed the 9/11 widows.

Market for bat shit futures hits a new high today.

Clip from “Graduate” remake:

“Let me give ya a tip kid- Guano- the future’s in Guano”.

Ann Coulter is a character from an underground comic who has been transported into mainstream consciousness. She is not to be taken seriously.

I guess her agent or handler or the dude who lets her out of the cage every morning (ok, bad taste, thousand apologies) called up Ed Schultz trying to book her and Ed was having none of it…goes to show that talk radio can be classier than the morning mainstream pulp that passes as news.

sorry purvis and tlaloc, you ignore people like this at your peril. Far better to expose, air out, fumigate and disinfect rather than let this grow like fungus in the dark.

Maryjane Osa #26 – I didn’t see Griffith, but put up the clip of C&L, not noticing the Griffith part. Classic.

Coulter’s cruelty could not be more transparently calculating. She’s hoping ultimately to goad one of more of these widows into a public cat-fight. All part of her marketing strategy. She is scum.

Coulter attractive? Sexually? Wow! Guess we’ve all got different wiring- but she’s a starter in the anti-boner defense league in my opinion.

Anne:

Please start the colonization of Mars NOW.

“Coulter attractive? Sexually? Wow! Guess we’ve all got different wiring- but she’s a starter in the anti-boner defense league in my opinion.”

I concur with your diagnosis. Ewww…

looseheadprop @ 8:

Never forget, Fitz lived thorugh all of this. Saw it first hand. he knows how ruthess these people can be.

Yes, he did. And he’s still there. Not blicking. Not giving an inch. He’s still there, with oh-so-tasty snark to put the icing on his legal filings. He saw it all, he knows them and their tactics, and he’s still there. Damn, he’s good . . .

If they want Fitz taken out, they’re going to have to do him like they did Cox: feet first.

And lhp, given what you shared here, I’d say Fitz is already playing by Chicago Rules. He may not be announcing it to the press, or even saying out loud, one lawyer to another, but the message is clear from Fitz to Rove: don’t mess with me.

Here in the Bay Area, Chicago Rules were expressed in a different tone as seen in another law and order movie. As another angry public servant in the mold of Sean Connery put it, to the crook lying on the ground in his gunsight: I know what you’re thinking. Did he fire six shots or only five? Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement, I’ve kinda lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you’ve got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya punk?

So, Karl, look at that briefcase. Has Fitz emptied it out, or is there still a filing in there with your name on it? Maybe Addington’s name? Maybe Dick’s name? A Federal Prosecutor with an indictment ready to go is about the most powerful person in the nation, and it would blow your boy’s presidency clean off. You’ve got to ask yourself one question, Karl . . .

Damn, he’s good – so good, he’s been playing by Chicago Rules already, and we hadn’t even noticed.

FITZ!

Ann Coulter=Abu Musab Al Zarqawi in a cocktail dress.

Extremist psuedo religious fascists.

-GSD

Heard the Dixie Chicks on “Fresh Air” this afternoon while drivin around. They sounded pretty good- although the vocals were much better on some cuts than others.

They said that they never expected how their original comment would change their careers- but added that they don’t have to be as careful about what they say anymore cause their NEW fans all share their views.

Enjoyed the interview. These girls sound about as middle america as they come.

Re the EPUs last thread on GW’s poll bounce (if any): Anybody see whether these polls pre- or ante-date the Canadian-terrorists news?

If so, I ‘magine tonight’s news (CBS, anyhow) that the VA’s blunder also affects at least 50K active-duty troops will put a speedy quietus to THAT. (That among other odds ‘n’ ends . . .)

As Kathy Griffin always sez, Taylor, whenever people call her Kathy Griffith, “Griffin, it’s GRIFFIN!” Don’t feel like the Lone Ranger, it happens so often it’s part of Kathy’s schtick.

Oh my, Ann Coulter. Just when we thought she’d defined “over the top,” she goes after the widows of 9/11! Shameful, really, that The Today Show gave her a platform, I guess it’s all downhill for Matt now that Katie’s gone…. (*G*)

“Holy Batwings!!! Robin, now we stop catch all the nefarious regimes of the world”

kristinejoy,

you mean repatriating, not coloninzing, right ?

and hey, look at this anagram

No Real C**t

One of the reasons I like to bring up Ann Coulter when she slithers out with one of her books is because I believe she actually embarrasses the Republicans. I never miss an opportunity to do that, believe me.

Ooops, right, TeddySanFran. I knew that, just typed it wrong.

It’s disgraceful that our TV media decides to put this woman on the airwaves.

And I am unwilling to continue reading here as long as comments about Ann’s possible transgender-ness are permitted.

Not funny, people. There’s lots of stuff to say about Ann that doesn’t demean our transgender brothers and sisters.

Bye for now….

It’s 6-6-6…that explains all about Coulter.

Here is the link to Kathy taking Psycho Nut Bag on …

http://www.crooksandliars.com/…..html#a8607

cbl–HA!

Dejah Thoris woulda kicked her ass…

Anne Coulter is another reason I’m so glad I’m a Kinsey-6.1

Yikes, did anyone else read this Craig Unger story in VF on the Niger forgeries?

http://www.vanityfair.com/feat…..0606fege02

Is this new?

Shorter Eli: You big meanies! You shameless hurt the feeling of transvestites nationwide!

As for staying on topic, I’m all for that. But, Coulter isn’t playing to this crowd and couldn’t care less what we think of her.

Demagogue, yes, useless, no. Coulter and people like her should be publically derided at every chance. The do nothing crowd has shown us what doesn’t work.

I think we can devote a post or two without losing focus, right? Or have I missed entirely that FDL is the center of the political universe or something?

Grow up? Thou doth protest too much, methinks.

It’s disgraceful that our TV media decides to put this woman on the airwaves.

That is EXACTLY the point.

Why does Matt Lauer Hate America? Why does Matt Lauer debase himself, by dredging up the vilest filth from the Right Wing Cess Pool?

Ignoring or responding Ann Coulter, your choice, mach nix –

Holding her corporate media enablers feet to the fire, priceless –

Agree with rw and Coz, but have you-all looked around lately at what constitutes sexual attractiveness in our great land? Ugh. She’s skinny and hanging a skimpy little dress on her Big Set. Walmart America likes that kind of thing, Goddess save us all…

Griffin was great, thanks Maryann

Sad truth: you can say just about anything and if you’ve got the audience and media-darling gig, you will be taken seriously. Especially if you are controversial, semi-attractive (sexually), and the viewers will be polarized: love you or hate you, whatever, they’ll tune in. Because that’s the game: Sell soap! Sell lots of sexy soap! Watch this stupid mouthy blonde bimbo say outragious things%u2014it’s good TV!

I’m counting on that!

I’m ready for my close-up, now.

#9, Taylor;

That’s weak, man. You obviously chose the graphic.

lhp (8) — Thanks for the reply. I think they missed the window of opportunity to SNM our Fitz, would have been the holiday break, before the Ports-Dubai story broke wide open. Now they are firmly in danger of losing not the religious whackos (to use Scanlon’s label) but the paleo- and traditional conservatives if they go SNM. I figure they have until the end of the month to do it, tops. When is the next break for Congress?

Peterr’s right about the Chicago Rules; I’m sure by now Fitz knows he’s got at least one plant on board and any discussions are being recorded. I think that’s why we heard the scuttle about a Sealed v. Sealed; they already knew a shoe was going to drop and they went preemptive. Unlike many folks, I think there is some actual meat to the Leopold and WMR stories, just as there was to the TANG stories. It’s right there — except somebody has also thrown sand in our eyes and in Fitz’. There probably is more than one sealed indictment and it’s just a matter of getting through this latest defensive move.

Trust those fey instincts; I’ve learned to trust mine. But mine tell me something big is happening before the end of June, and it won’t be all bad.

Hey Taylor good to see/read you around here again. Hope all is well…

Jack Cafferty just replayed his classic– we better pray nothing happens to Specter (wrt NSA) …followed by this:

What an idiot I am

Specter is a gutless republican worm.

There aren’t gonna be any hearings.

Dick Cheney’s gonna decide and the worthless senators are gonna let him

I chose the graphic because it was a doll, like in plastic. Are you telling me that one line in the description knocks out the doll aspect?

MaryAnn -

Re VF piece; I despise this chickenhawk Ledeen puke:
_____

“…In January 2003, two months before the war started, he wrote, “If we were serious about waging this war, we would, at an absolute minimum, support the Iranian people’s brave campaign against their tyrants %u2026 and recognize an Iraqi government in exile in the ‘no fly’ zones we control. %u2026 If we don’t, we may well find ourselves facing a far bigger problem than Saddam alone.”

Ledeen repeatedly urged war or destabilization not just in Iraq but also in Iran, Syria, Lebanon, even Saudi Arabia. “One can only hope that we turn the region into a cauldron, and faster, please,” he wrote. “Faster, please” became his mantra, repeated incessantly in his National Review columns.

Rhapsodizing about war week after week, Ledeen became chief rhetorician for neoconservative visionaries who wanted to remake the Middle East. “Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad,” he wrote after the attacks. “We must destroy [our enemies] to advance our historic mission.”

The U.S. must be “imperious, ruthless, and relentless,” he argued, until there has been “total surrender” by the Muslim world. “We must keep our fangs bared,” he wrote, “we must remind them daily that we Americans are in a rage, and we will not rest until we have avenged our dead, we will not be sated until we have had the blood of every miserable little tyrant in the Middle East, until every leader of every cell of the terror network is dead or locked securely away, and every last drooling anti-Semitic and anti-American mullah, imam, sheikh, and ayatollah is either singing the praises of the United States of America, or locked securely away, and every last drooling anti-Semitic and anti-American mullah, imam, sheikh, and ayatollah is either singing the praises of the United States of America, or pumping gasoline, for a dime a gallon, on an American military base near the Arctic Circle.”

so far, the Unger article in VF is revealing nothing new to Plameologists but Vanity Fair readers may be informed…
I still am reading it though…

The wingnuts are in full blossom.

Check out this beauty from “Pro-Torture 9″ Senator, Oklahoma’s finest–Straight Jim Inhofe.

“INHOFE: As you see here, and I think this is maybe the most important prop we’ll have during the entire debate, my wife and I have been married 47 years. We have 20 kids and grandkids. I’m really proud to say that in the recorded history of our family, we’ve never had a divorce or any kind of homosexual relationship.”

As I said elsewhere, it is rather creepy that he has the sexual histories of his family memorized…Here’s to hoping that he doesn’t do chastity checks.

It also begs the question, just how often the family “records” their sex acts.

-GSD

Coulter’s cruelty could not be more transparently calculating.

I agree. It’s hard to not react (the jabs at the surviving family of those killed in the terrorist attacks was just vicious) but she lives to goad.

Taylor Marsh @ 4:08 pm (#58) Griffin was great.

Looks like she wasn’t read in on the limits of acceptable banter, though.

Insulting widows who say things our owners don’t like == OK.

Insulting harpies who says things that are useful to our owners == NOT OK.

Or maybe Standards and Practices got hung up on that obscene phrase “Who fact checks?”.

O)K Valley Girl, I’ll bite. What’s up with the mod com check thingie? you aren’t with the NSA are you? lol

And I’ll crap if she comes back and asks for that in triplicate!!!!

from a Smirking Chimp thread:

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/v…..mp;forum=4

It’s common knowledge that Ann Coulter is the nom de plume and anagram of Cale Turnon, noted psychopathic female impersonator, and the bastard love child of Dr. Mengele and Rush Limbaugh. The infamous so-called “pilonidal cyst” that kept Rush out of the military was in fact Cale’s ectopic pregnancy.

=====

So Ann (Cale) actually exploded out of Rush Limbaugh’s anus? That explains everything.

=====

“The National Government will preserve and defend those basic principles on which our nation has been built up. They regard Christianity as the foundation of our national morality and the family as the basis of national life.” –Adolf Hitler

Bustednuckles-sorry for the intrusion. Please ignore. Just a way to communicate quickly about behind the scene spam problems, comments that need to be released from moderation and such while JH and RH are otherwise occupied during their big Vegas adventure.

VG
I figured it was something along those lines. I was being nosy. ;~)

cujo359 – I think Griffin was also right on when she talked about being ostracized to the outside and not given a spot on the real show. What was that about?

WTF? people here are defending Coulter? just wait til she goes after the widows from this idiotic war that Clusterfuck started in Iraq. you know she will.

Taylor – how about the next time that you write about tranny coulter you use a piece of dog doo as the graphic.

Amen, Rusty. I’m with you.

Coulter is the reason god invented fast-acting poisons.

On topic this time . . .

And I thought I needed another cup of coffee this morning. Spit-takes over bad puns is one thing, but Ann Coulter before breakfast is waaaay over the line. In so many ways.

Serious, Ann C looked like a deer in the headlights when Matt read her quote back to her. The look on her face was like “Did I write that?”

I can also picture Katie Couric, relaxing at home on her post-Today, pre-CBS vacation, calling Matt after the show. In her most serious voice, she tells him, “Damn. If I’d only stayed another week, I could have done that interview.” Then she bursts out in laughter, spoiling the effect.

Meanwhile a thousand women at home watched it all, then burned their little black dresses. “My eyes. . . my eyes . . never again . . . never again!”

Ann has dead eyes.

I saw the piece this morning and cursed Matt Lauer for the winger fuck he is. I don’t give a shit if he limply called her on the carpet for her despicable remark–he should have grilled her about voter fraud and death threats against Supreme Court judges.

She is as vile and repugnant as they come. I’d rather ride Pat Buchanan bareback than listen to her crap.

Whoa. Sorry ’bout that image. I mean, I’d make him shave his back first!

Annie appeals to NASCAR fans- she’s an accident waiting to happen. No body knows what kind of mindless hatred is going to come out of her mind next.

“Did you see Annie? Did she just say we should kill all the black babies? Holy shit- pass me another Lone Star”.

Rayne: “the TANG stories”?

Off topic – in case anyone has been wondering why I haven’t posted recently, my broadband Internet service provider has some domain name resolution problems that prevent its servers from finding FDL at its new location.

I’m using public domain name servers now to gain access to FDL. If others are encountering problems similar to what I experienced in recent days trying to gain access to FDL, please use Google or some other search engine to look for public domain name servers near you. So long as you are comfortable with changing your TCP/IP settings, you will easily be able to manually enter the Internet protocol addresses for the server(s).

1.”These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by griefparrazies. I have never seen people enjoying their husband’s death so much.”

I am stunned that she would say something like that. Just stunned.

2. Here’s ANOTHER opportunity for the Democrats. Coulter always needs to be referred to as “leading Republican voice, Ann Coulter”….and on and on. Fix HER to the R team. Ask aloud, why do republicans blame the widows of 9-11?

Let the R team try to straighten out the mess. But put the R team on the defensive.
Ghostman

TANG – Texas Air National Guard

O.K., it’s time to be the devil’s advocate again.
First I should say that I really, really, don’t like Ann Coulter, or anything she stays for, or the way that she stands for it. BUT,

She cleaned Matt Lauer’s clock. She did. Because he is a wuss. He should have showered her with outrage and really got in her face. But he didn’t. Because he wasn’t prepared, or because he is incapable of doing it. He’s the Morning Show nice guy. Ann Coulter eats them for hors d’oeuvres. His indignation was barely a mumble which she ran over with her Mack truck. She is a Nazi and a LIAR. She is also very intelligent, even though her ideas are outrageous and false. As for her sex appeal, suffice it to say “beauty is only skin deep but ugly goes clean to the bone”, and it is in the eye of the beholder.

I don’t know how to talk computer, but something unprecedented just happened to my FDL (I’ve seen it elsewhere but not here). The format has gone to TNR12 spread fullscreen on a white background. You too, or is it just on my end?

Now back to normal.

“Fix HER to the R team. Ask aloud, why do republicans blame the widows of 9-11?”

Spot on!

internet elves are fucking around on the FDL servers it seems…

fahrender, I disagree.

I think Matt Lauer did a fine job. He pointed out what an idiot she is, and let it stand at that. She came across as a shrill opportunist.

I really think he did well. Actually think quick notes saying so would be helpful.

Ghostman, Ditto. That’s dead on.

Of course our message/spin deficient politicos will pass it by. ;)

Ghostman @85, you nailed one there.

Every time folks hear “leading Republican voice, Ann Coulter”, it’s another three votes for Dems. “If that’s a Republican voice,” says every mainstream Republican women who hears this bile, “then mine surely isn’t Republican.”

At the risk of reinforcing an already painful image (thank you so much, Tommy Yum @81!), Coulter could easily be the 2006/2008 version of Pat Buchanan. His 1992 “Culture War” speech at the Republican Convention helped Clinton a lot more than it did Bush 41.

Please, Ann, write another book . . . but NBC, warn me before putting her on the air. We don’t let our four year old watch that kind of thing. He’ll have nightmares for weeks.

Ann Coulter, or as she is known in Republican circles, the Ghost of Josef Goebbels.

-GSD

*ilson46201 says:
June 6th, 2006 at 4:43 pm

internet elves are fucking around on the FDL servers it seems…

==
I hope this is temporary, like really temporary. There must have been some problems earlier too- seems people ended up posting the same comment multiple times bec. at first they got an “error” message.. Oh, and I recently got that same page layout weirdness too, but it went away.

one more thing. if you really want to get your knickers in a twist, tune in to Tucker Carlson tonight. he’s “having” coulter on his show. i’ve never watched his show but i may tonight just to really get pissed off. there is no one whom i hold in lower regard. the two of them together ought to be really something.

I hope this is not a stupid question, but I want to email a couple of the posts here to a friend and there is no option to “email to a friend”. Any FDL folks want to help me out with this highly technical issue?

Love this post btw.

for a while I was even deleting those extra copies – NSA has their ways of getting copies of everything we write and say without need for CCs …

will her head twist around and will she projectile vomit while spewing her hate-speech at the same time?

jere: copy&paste is your friend …

*ilson !!!

myskinner lever REFRESH button has disappeared – whaaaa!

“And out top nominee for today’s worst person in the world is REPUBLICAN, Ann Coulter…”

- Keith Olberman

Don’t I wish.

oh, there it is, sorry *ilson!

I still have the weird page layout, all white and no refresh comments buttons and no FDL header

LOL @ skinner lever ! so apropos! I too feel like such the pigeon pecking at 15 second intervals…

Your graphic for Dear WSJ a few doors down reminded me of a joke Leno told last night about Kenneth Lay. Imagine a poor guy having to go to prison with a name like Ken Lay–he might as well just change it to Ben Dover.

Goopers on Hardball are downplaying the results of the Bilbray/Busby race. Could be that early exit polls don’t look good for em. Here’s hoping!

internet elves are fucking around on the FDL servers…

We need a Constitutional amendment banning that.

Jere, right click then left click on send link. It should go to E-mail Then add comment for which post to read.

Suzanne- try right clicking and reloading/ refreshing the page via the browser.

Of course Anne Coulter spews her vile today – (shakes head, rolls eyes) the 40th anniversary of Robert Kennedy’s Ripple of Hope speech

Seriously, watch the trailer – if a tear doesn’t come to your eye – there’s something profoundly wrong with you.

HT to puddle

Tweety says that he knows that he can ifluence the vote still in the 50th and then highlights Busby’s comments over the weekend about “you can still help with no papers”.

He’s desperate.

jere – copy the url at the top of this page into your email.

Urban Pirate (#91):

We’ll just have to disagree on that. I think that Coulter must be refuted boldly and forcefully. What Lauer did wasn’t forceful or articulate. He was flabbergasted and off balance. He had no passion and showed no indignation. Repugnant as her words were she was bold and unrepentant. She knew that she hadn’t been effectively challenged.

OT and behind times. So if I understand it, here’s the WSJ’s take.

1. The Prosecutor has filed a document that states that Libby gave copies of portions of the NIE to a gov’t official, who gave them to WSJ (and impliedly sets up that WSJ dutifully wrote an OpEd in line with the cherrypicked classified info they were leaked.)

2. WSJ – Ouch. He makes us sound like whores and fools and pliant, easily manipulated Gumby dolls.

3. Prosecutor says that government “does not intend to offer in evidence a copy of the editorial itself” and is not going to use NIE leak info as a grounds for charges, but rather to show that Libby was, despite his claim of too many other things, still “heavily focused on shaping media coverage of the controversy concerning Iraqi efforts to obtain uranium from Niger.”

4. WSJ – (stomping foot) well, yeah, but . . . but . . . but, we got a horse named Pokey who talks. So there.

I wonder who wrote the piece? They start a paragraph with “Quoth the NIE.” I am not making that part up. Quoth? Did WSJ beat WaPo to the “let’s hire a gameboy expert who has visions of — uh, well, just visions I guess ” punch?

So imagine our surprise when Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald declared his intention last month to use that editorial ROFL. Imagine everyone’s surprise – especially since the S. Prosecutor (#3 above) said he wasn’t going to be offering it into evidence. (In keeping with the discussion below on su’thin talk, as a child sent north of the river to school, I was amazed to learn that surprise was actually one word, not two, punctuated by a swallow of air in the middle.)

It suggests that his case is a lot weaker than his media spin. That got a screen wipe. So We do not comment on pending cases is media spin and wildly successful media spin at that? That would make Rove the Grasshopper and Samborn (sp?) the Master? *G* (Pssst: I hear the Prosecutor’s spokesman is secretly funded by, the “Crickets Chirping Foundation.” )

In the “who wins the parsing contest this week” WSJ says “Libby was not our source.” Or maybe that was the, “see, we can all agree about some things” contest? The Prosecutor says the exact same thing – Libby gave the info to another govt official, who gave it to WSJ. So – WSJ basically just confirmed that, right? Someone should send them a thank-you note.

They then mention that Libby had to fight back about “critics who make false allegations” (as opposed to, oh, say calling their wife and family fair game and punching the 3yo when Dad wasn’t looking). To prove it all, they work in the “Quoth” of the “talking NIE” (who want’s to bet they named it Pokey?)

At least – they Quoth the part they were given, back then. Seeing as more is now declassified, and it shows that the quote they were given did not include the other information that disputes their “quoth” you have to wonder: How does someone who can’t read footnotes get through a prospectus?

Whazzat? Gameboys don’t come with footnotes? Explains a lot.

Fun is where you find it. ;-)

Ghostman 84

I agree. Excellant repetitive talking point.
She should always be painted with the republican brand and… whenever possible as the soulless wretch she is.

I mean really, why is the REPUBLICAN spokeswoman ANN COULTER upset that the 911 orphans miss their parents. *g*

Taylor – i just made a new graphic of coulter for you to use. let me know……

rwcole –

the college girl has called me twice from her Busby gig -,

says exit polling looking better than expected

and

she clearly has her first election night rush, talking a mile a minute – citing “demos” and “the numbers” – lol!

fwiw, I’m halfway through the Unger article in VF on the Niger Forgeries. Horribly detailed but still nothing brand new…

I’d like to propose that some enterprising blogger start a campaign to send ‘Ann’, funny name for a guy, oh say, ten cases of Wild Turkey. Little political theatre….

And who knows?

She might drink it all.

send it to me, rusty: http://www.taylormarsh.com/contact.php

BobbyG—Ledeen has issues, no? My goodness. And they call us the angry ones!

Hmmm, I meant bile

Eli:And why do titillation-obsessed Democrats keep yammering on about Ann Coulter’s Adam’s Apple, as if anything about her sexuality has the slightest bearing on her political lunacy.

Could Eli be considered a “concern troll”? I know the term usually refers to a wingnut who lectures Democrats about what they should do to be electable, but doesn’t the term also refer to liberals like Eli who are concerned that liberals are being too unpleasant?

Kind of like brothers-in-law: aren’t there two kinds of brothers-in-law? You know, your wife’s brother and your sister’s husband?

Just asking.

Whether Lauer did well or not, the question is really more why they have her on. I can understand giving any extremist hatespokesperson, even a David Dukes, a one time shot – but I don’t really think morning shows with little kids watching is the most appropriate place to have someone rolling like a cowdog in dung to the harpy call of enjoying WTC deaths. But now they know – she comes on to say hateful, despicable things and not much else.

If the point is just to stir the pot with hatred, why don’t they do a weeklong segment on how to use the internet for fun and profit setting up hate sites?

Tuesday we’ll show you how to download pictures of dead and dieing Muslims and how to see if your site is capable of hosting videos as well, and we’ll have a call in segment so you can talk to an expert who will show how you can use your site to sponsor a little league team. Wednesday – some new and interesting approaches to webhosting information on abortion doctors that just might lead to some exciting headlines in the future! We’re holding back Thursday as a mystery hate, uh, mystery date, but don’t miss our finale on Friday – The Gay Bashing Boom! You can profit too! Back to you Ann.

It’s just disgusting, no matter how they handle it.
IMHO, FWIW.

Taylor – done.

one final tranny coulter rant. she calls Lewinsky a “fat Jewish girl”. think about that.

Inhofe – “Very Proud” to have never had a homosexual in the family

Senator, I am “Very Embarassed” to belong to the same species of animal as your backward ass

finished the Unger article: good! nothing newsmaking … detailed as all hell

They repudiate science when it contradicts their pagan beliefs…
Unlike Republicans, who of course only repudiate science when it contradicts their Christian beliefs. Or might affect the bottom line.

I was unaware that Druids or Wiccans had such strong beliefs about breast implants. You learn something new everday from Ann. Nothing applicable to reality, but nonetheless, something new.

Mary, if you ever get tired of the law (yeh, riiiight), how ’bout you become the next LiJa Productions*?

* Lily Tomlin/Jan Wagner

cbl–That sounds encouraging. I’m cautiously pessimistic about the result- but every ray of hope helps.

It will turn on turnout. Did your daughter mention turnout?

JanE Wagner

oh, and Larry, 116: yes, I did go back and read your comment on earlier thread. Thank you for the good words, and I agree with your assessment.
Ghostman

Dang – ck 55 – you said it better, first and shorter.

angie – 62. Jack really said that? I actually kinda like Jack (and Lou too – even if he is a bit nuts on some stuff).

Ummm…someone, somewhere must have already noted that Ann Coulter’s book came out on 06-06-06?

Ann Coulter exists to divert attention. Any time the Repugs need her out there she is going to divert a solid amount of news away from the public. When the dems take over it would be nice if we had someone like her to keep the wingnuts busy bitching about that person instead of grandstanding about worthy news items.

Yes Mary, he was not a happy camper at all. His voice was dripping with disgust.

Taylor, do not change this graphic. It’s funny and entertaining. It is clearly not meant to be inoffensive. Ms Marsh apologizes to anyone she did not offend in this post.

Now, move along, please.

Lotus – I didn’t exactly get tired of it, but I left the law for someone else awhile back. I still fool around with him on the side, but we’re not “an item.” ;-)

LiJa – Yeah – in my dreams. *g*

I do bitter better than banter.

Chain Ann (and Malkin) to the Neocon Party, and toss the anchor overboard.

http://finance.messages.yahoo……;mid=73948

anchor? Malkin? as in “Anchor Baby” ?

Thesaurus Rex @ 5:27 pm (#139) – I’m with TRex, here. It’s a funny graphic.

Actually, Austin Powers said it all when it comes to Ann Coulter, “She’s a man, baby!”

Richard Mellon Schiafe found him/her while out trolling in gay bars in Gainesville in the late 80’s. She was still more he then she back then and was trying to make it as a drag queen but couldn’t cut it because she couldn’t sing, had no talent, and the other “girls” hated her because she was such a raging bitch even then. And she stole their stuff. She was such a nasty skank.
It was well known that the only reason the boss put up with her was because he didn’t have to listen to her mouth as long as he kept something in it.
But even he was glad when Schiafe took her away.
She came back once to show off after a couple of years of Schiafe paying for her treatments. She looked better but she was still such a bitch that we all threatened to kick her ass if she didn’t get the f**k out of there. that was the last I saw of her until I saw her on TV trashing Clinton with Jennifer Flowers.

Mary: maybe I’ll have a comeback to that when my laugh-riddled ribs stop hurting. Meanwhile, jes’ fine, jes’ fine.

Fuck, I wish I could TYPE!

TRex, I had no intention of changing the graphic, believe me. I do, however, thank you for your wit and I am sorry that I didn’t offend enough of you. Maybe rusty’s graphic at the link below will accomplish that:

http://www.taylormarsh.com/arc…..p?id=24123

This is kind of an open thread, right? I just read on the HuffPo that Hillary is going to run on the kind of marriage she has and Bill is going to campaign for her on that issue too. I’ve said all along that the NYT “attack” on their marriage was with their full consent. Is she just going to run on that? Does she get a pass on the Iraq war? Yikes, sometimes I feel like Fiedler in the Spy Who Came in from the Cold.

As a contributing editor and syndicated columnist at the National Review Online (NRO) Coulter was asked by editors to make changes to a piece written in 2001 soon after the September 11 attacks in which her friend Barbara Olsen had been killed. On the national television show Politically Incorrect, Coulter accused NRO of censorship and claimed she was paid $5 per article. NRO dropped her column and terminated her.[4] Jonah Goldberg, editor-at-large of NRO, said, “We did not ‘fire’ Ann for what she wrote. … We ended the relationship because she behaved with a total lack of professionalism, friendship, and loyalty”.[5]

Coulter contracted with USA Today to cover the 2004 Democratic National Convention, but was replaced by Jonah Goldberg after an editing disagreement (Memmot, 2004). She wrote one article that began, “Here at the Spawn of Satan convention in Boston”, and referred to some (unspecified) female attendees as “corn-fed, no make-up, natural fiber, no-bra needing, sandal-wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie chick pie wagons.” The newspaper declined to print the article, and Coulter published it instead on her website.

On August 28, 2005, Coulter’s syndicated column was dropped by the Tucson newspaper Arizona Daily Star. David Stoeffler, the editor and publisher said, “We’ve decided that syndicated columnist Ann Coulter has worn out her welcome. Many readers find her shrill, bombastic and mean-spirited. And those are the words used by readers who identified themselves as conservatives.”[6]

Coulter is represented by Premiere Speakers Bureau.[7]

Wikipedia

I’m speaking metaphorically, of course, ilson…Drop anchor!

http://www.mediatransparency.o…..rsonID=106

Coulter the Molter, uggghhh.

OT, from a DKos diary:

Rumors are flying fast and furious in CT that this weekend’s Really Bad Press has pushed the Lieberman Campaign to declare their independent run sooner rather than later.

They have people doing research about returning money if asked once the go Indy. My bet is Lieberman’s gone by the end of the month.

Internal Polls show his nosedive continues.
Bye-Bye JOE.

http://dumpjoe.com/

by ctkeith on Tue Jun 06, 2006 at 12:53:20 PM PDT

Mary at 114,
That made me laugh so hard, I think i pulled a muscle. Randall Samborn should get a framed copy of that post.

Fabulous!

Peterr and rayne,

Thank you for being braver than me. I was feeling pretty aprehensive. I’m glad you have the level of faith that you do, and thanks for loaning some of that faith to me.

Nice site, punaise!

bridge Don’t know- don’t care. I’m sick to death of the puke inducing discussions about the Clinton’s marriage.

erm, I meant to say using the deaths not enjoying. can the moderator either fix it or delete it so I can?

my 5:33, that is.

rwcole @ 5:37 pm (#149) – Many readers find her shrill, bombastic and mean-spirited. And those are the words used by readers who identified themselves as conservatives.

That one’s priceless.

when a brave student tried to throw a pie at Anne when speaking at a small college in Indiana, I sent the P.R. Dept a thank you note for educating students so well as to do the right thing when confronted by fascism.

Montana Senate results should be tricking in now. Go, Tester.

*ilson, I thought you got arrested today…..

bridge 146

Stand by your man. At first, it sounds really stupid. After some consideration, I’m thinking that it might be a good way for Hillary to market herself – that is – getting Bill back into the mix. Pitch the old two for one angle. Vote for Hill and you get Bill again. Many voters would love to have Bill back to straighten up the mess that the Worst President Ever has created.

A millionaire customer told me that he hated Bill Clinton b/c Clinton cost him a hundred grand. Clinton’s first term featured a one time fat cat tax. It’s gonna be (got to be) payback time for millionaires again to fix the deficit caused (yet again, duh) by trickle down economics.

Riesz Fischer says:
June 6th, 2006 at 5:08 pm
Eli:And why do titillation-obsessed Democrats keep yammering on about Ann Coulter’s Adam’s Apple, as if anything about her sexuality has the slightest bearing on her political lunacy.

Could Eli be considered a “concern troll”? I know the term usually refers to a wingnut who lectures Democrats about what they should do to be electable, but doesn’t the term also refer to liberals like Eli who are concerned that liberals are being too unpleasant?

Kind of like brothers-in-law: aren’t there two kinds of brothers-in-law? You know, your wife’s brother and your sister’s husband?

Just asking.
———————————————————-
I don’t think so. I think that Eli’s point was that saying that Ann looks like the world’s worst drag queen is an insult to drag queens. Calling her Tranny Coulter is similarly offensive to transsexuals (One “s” or two? I’m never sure.). There’s no need to denigrate her based her personal appearance. We should keep the focus as tight as we can on the fact that she’s batshit crazy. With her running around bashing 9/11 widows, I don’t think it’ll be that hard to do.

I havent been arrested since May 1971 in DC … damn lawyers keep telling me I am right but cops have handcuffs and guns so I back down — the better part of valor and all that…

what Frank Probst said

(The top people in the administration) are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by (the mainstream media). I have never seen people (using the death of 3000 people) so much.

(many thanks to the magician behind the scenes!)

I think Frank Probst is right. Hatred of other (as in different) people is the Rethuglican game, and you don’t want to swim in their sewer.

Most important thing in Montana is for Burns to win the gooper primary- as long as he’s the candidate- MONTANA’s IN PLAY.

Night all. I going to bed early so tomorrow I won’t have the blank stare and slow uptake that Coulture displayed with Lauer this AM.

I want to have my wits about me. Catch you on the flip side.

*ilson, can you recruit 499 friends to get arrested with you, just so we can chant Free the Indy 500!

For anyone who wonders what this is about, *ilson was stalking Laura Bush today and got chased off a college campus by the police. (Is that a reasonable synopsis?)

I’m not seeing ANY election news ANYWHERE- not even New Jersey- where the polls must have closed some time ago. Anyone got a site?

*ilson, I think that Indiana college is Earlham, a small Quaker liberal arts college and the one my daughter picked out of a pile of two dozen and will start attending this fall. Isn’t that cool? I’m so proud, I’ve raised a teen-aged liberal! AND she bakes some killer pies.

Taylor,

I could only manage to get through a couple paragraphs of Coulter’s chapter……before almost throwing up, but you’re right she’s finally gone off the deep end. I wish we could ignore such ignorance and stupidity, but unfortunately she gets too much attention from the MSM to completely disregard.

rwcole, I get the feeling Burns could win if Tester loses the Dem. primary. Tester’s opponent recently admitted to an extramarital affair, so his ability to hammer Burns is very hampered.

Go Tester!

What Coulter said is totally outrageous.

I thought the following link was total crap, but now I am thinkingit might be true

rwcole,

just got back from KOS and MYDD – zip, Nada, nuttin’ yet !

the daughter says numbers look “slightly higher” than projected AND about an hour ago, said they were expecting a post commute ‘bump’

new thread

for tracking Montana Senate results (nothing shown yet)

cbl–Thanks- please keep us posted on daughter communication!

Thanks, Frank. Good answer.

What Coulter said is totally outrageous.

I thought the following link was total crap, but now I am thinking it might be true

Look, Canada is profoundly different country. Regardless we have to be vigilant about the Pox Americana that Coulter represents. We are taking the recent terror allegations with a large grain of salt. I believe that there is a lot less here that meets the eye. The fact is that now on the ground the alleged suspects are being dealt with in a manner that is in fact unconstitutional (CDN). By the way gay marriage is constitutional here.
What we have is a want-to-be conservative government that wants to be a Bushco mini-me. It isn’t going to happen. I an profoundly disappointed that denizens of FDL have played so precisely along with Bushco and Coulter to suggest that Canada is a refuge of Al-Queda. The Pox Americana will never infect Canada.
BTW, the Sopranos is shown uncut on network television here. Good luck getting FOX to follow suit. There comes a point when the ‘Good Americans’ will be regarded as the ‘Good Germans’ now are.

Bad link, James A

angie @ 4:12 pm (#62) – The transcript of this Situation Room is up at CNN.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CAFFERTY: What an idiot I am. I actually thought at the time Senator Specter was going to exercise his responsibility to provide some congressional oversight of the executive branch, you know, see if the White House is playing by the rules. Silly me.

In the end, Senator Specter has turned out to be yet another gutless Republican worm cowering in the face of pressure from the administration and fellow Republicans. There are not going to be any hearings. Americans won’t find out if their privacy is being illegally invaded.

You know what the Senate Judiciary Committee settled for instead? Senator Orrin Hatch said he has won assurances from Vice President Dick Cheney that the White House will review proposed changes to the law that would restrict certain aspects of the NSA program.

Dick Cheney is going to decide if it’s OK to spy on American citizens without a warrant. And this worthless [of] bunch senators has agreed to let him do it. It’s a disgrace.

I liked some of the e-mails he received on this one. Just search for “cafferty” at the page I linked.

Andrew Cohen at the WaPo went through a similar moment of cognitive dissonance today, and then recovered nicely.

You’ll note YT had a handy metaphor for Mr. Cohen today in the comments.

“I an profoundly disappointed that denizens of FDL have played so precisely along with Bushco and Coulter to suggest that Canada is a refuge of Al-Queda.”

You’re kidding, right?

Christine Pelosi is supposedly going to be live blogging about the CA-50 from here:

http://www.challengernet.com/H…..fault.aspx

Sleep “less tight than Ann” lhp and knock em dead tomorrow.

Re: CA-50 GOTV: Focus Like a Laser Beam on Special Election & Primary Voters By jacks on 6/6/2006 4:07 PM
Is there any exit polling data available now? When do the polls close.thx

——————————————————————————–

Re: CA-50 GOTV: Focus Like a Laser Beam on Special Election & Primary Voters By mfeld on 6/6/2006 4:50 PM
So far i’ve called Busby, Bilbray, Westly and Angelidies campaigns. They all have said that there won’t be any polling data available until 8pm tonight…. hard to beleive and gutwrenchingly painful to wait for…. but that seems to be the case

——————————————————————————–

Re: CA-50 GOTV: Focus Like a Laser Beam on Special Election & Primary Voters By Circle on 6/6/2006 8:44 PM
Hey Casey AisernmanHate mongering is not welcome at this site; go peddle you’re nastysnatch where it’s appreciated%u2014among your own kind.

——————————————————————————–

Re: CA-50 GOTV: Focus Like a Laser Beam on Special Election & Primary Voters By sfpelosi on 6/6/2006 8:45 PM
No exit polling. First results expected at around 8:30pm.Off to walk a final precinct for Francine!

(From the link above)

Cujo359 – 179
good snarling spineless dog analogy

Frank – do you know any trannies? I do. they are pretty tough girls and they would likely laugh in anne coulters face and call her worse things than i do. for her ‘looks’ and also for her politics.

With regards to focus, we need to keep the focus as tight as we can on the fact that the republican policies are a complete and total failure. a shrill harpy getting face time on matt lauer’s couch is nothing more than that. of course she’s crazy. that’s her schtick.

now, can we move on to “anchor babies”?

punaise @ 6:24 pm (#184) – Thanks. I just wish we’d named the little critter Arlen.

Now, thinking about the election for U.S. Congress in November, regardless of how you might plan to vote in your own district, which party would you like to see in control of Congress after the congressional elections in November: the Democrats or the Republicans?” If other/unsure: “Well, which way do you lean: more toward the Democrats or the Republicans?” Options rotated

.

Republicans Democrats Other (vol.) Unsure
% % % %
6/1-4/06
38 50 6 7
.

Among ALL adults (excludes leaners):

4/27-30/06 37 48 6 9
4/6-9/06 36 46 8 10
2/23-26/06 38 47 7 8
1/22-25/06 39 51 10 -
12/8-11/05
38 49 13 –

——————————————————————————–

TRex, I had no intention of changing the graphic, believe me. I do, however, thank you for your wit and I am sorry that I didn’t offend enough of you.

Tay-Lo-

I gotcher back, baby. And after I get everything moved over to Thesaurus Rex dot org, you can have the keys to party at my blog any time you like.

Stick shiksa?????

That was GOOD scotch I was drinkin’ when I read that!

Cujo359 … just wish we’d named the little critter Arlen.

yeah: Snarlin’ Arlen

Taylor and commenters, you always get it just right (lhp, peterr, ghostman, *ilson)and I thank you. It does a body, a person and a country good to know that you are out there. Brilliant, interesting and fun. My state is a primary one today, and it’s so good to know that you are involved in the ongoing care and health of this republic. EPU’d, but wanting it that way; I want you to know the hope that you give to others.

You would think that some of these quacks would do the right thing and take one for the party. Morrison in Montana, after getting bagged with the adultery, would just say, it’s not my time, and give it a rest….Jefferson in Lousiana is another……Jilted Joe Lieberman is another….Poor Joe, with the new gay marriage attack he won’t be able to marry Bush now: (

But nooooooooooo…

-GSD

Ann was bad, but Inhofe wins!
http://images1.americanprogres…..20.240.mov

I say we should at least promote Kathy Griffin to the B list.

It is so obvious they are scared to death. Coulter most of all. She is at full hysteria. When she goes as far in desperation as to rail against the 9/11 widows, you know she is almost gone. And make NO mistake — she IS done. She has lost any credibility she MIGHT have once had. (Any word on whether Bill Maher still loves her?)

Think about it. She doesn’t act this way to make money — she already has enough. Very soon, no one will want her on their teevees anymore — even Faux News. And THAT will kill her. Buh Bye, skank.

Shell (#195):

I’ll believe it after it happens.

She thinks she’s going to score points by referring to Lewinsky as Jewish how, exactly? Was that a shout-out to her neo-Nazi fan club?

Has anyone heard Kathy Griffin’s line, “sweaty, puffy coke whore”? Sorry, just had to tip the hat to KG tonight.

Sweet transexuals have it all going on – they are the salt of the earth – I love them dearly and they are all holy to me. That said I am still disturbed by this recent news report…’ the British government has recently learned that Arnie Coulter has sought significant quantities of testosterone from Switzerland…DEVELOPING.

Trust but verify.

“Why do Republicans keep fantasizing about gay marriage, and oral sex in the oval office?”

Because they’re gay and have oral sex in the WH?

(waynemadsenreport.com)

Coulter said: “President Clinton saved the Constitution by repeatedly ejaculating on a fat Jewish girl in the Oval Office.“
Making fun of Coulter’s skinniness and adam’s apple is just as fair as her making sport of Monica Lewinski’s weight. And why, for that matter, did she point out her Jewishness? Why do “conservatives” like Coulter get to say any damn thing they please, while we liberals have to be nice?
What a twit! Dag.

Judging people by their looks is wrong and hurtful – I have stopped reading many popular liberal blogs because they do this so routinely and cruelly. The point is that this hurts innocent people as well as evil people like Ann Coulter.

An interesting post somewhere on how msm reports more on murders here than our soldier’s deaths and injuries in Iraq. Why doesn’t the msm quit pretending to report news, go for broke & broadcast 24/7, every minute tabloid tv? We could see all day & night the coulters, the moonie fake ex-gay advisors, pick your favorite murder, the “supreme leader sounds good to me” kristols, left behind videos, robertson daily leg presses, polygamist hunters, weekly clinton marriage updates & rita cosby, rita cosby, rita cosby. Would rip van winkle americans finally get that the “liberal” media has been taken over by those who don’t want us to know anything of substance, that they think americans are too stupid to care? Would they say, hey, wait just a doggone minute, enough of this swill, we want real journalism back? Probably not. Years of insidious, creeping mindnumbing takes it’s toll.

Anne Coulter accusing ANYONE of being a media whore has to be the ultimate hypocrisy.

According to the Starr report, Clinton only ejaculated on Monica ONCE. So I don’t know where Coulter gets off asserting that Clinton repeatedly got off.

See a tongue-in-cheek visual depicting the new “war on Ann Coulter”…here:

http://www.thoughttheater.com

Unfortunately. if Ann Coulter were as ugly as a mud fence she would never have made it into print in any but the most needy right-wing blogs, let alone dream of getting a book published. And so it goes.