Instead, when I went over for a weekly check to see what their thread choices were, it went like this:

“Terrists arrested in Canada…terrists in the Gaza Strip…terrists in Iraq…terrists under the bed; terrists coming out of the bathtub drain; terrists in our navel lint; 9-11; 9-11; 9-11; 9-11; 9-11…and-they-brought-up-Haditha-real-quick-just-to-ruin-memorial-day-for-america…

TERRRRER! TERRRRRER! TERRRRER!

And when WILL all the surrender monkeys realize that we’re at WAR, goddammit, and that some of us are risking SERIOUS carpal-tunnel-syndrome AND piles from all the dangerous keyboard patrols we’re mounting, to keep the ragheads from buggering Ms. Liberty cross-eyed?

As Bill the Cat said: “Pffffttphttpptt!”

Sorry:)

Everybody knows that Webb is the ONLY candidate who has a half-ass chance to knock the racist grin off George Felix Allen’s face.

And like a lot of folks who may not be paying attention to the issues and candidates, they’ll just circle the name of Miller without a clue that they’re actually handing Allen an easy victory in November.

That they would endorse Westly, who is running as a more centrist fellow (question whether he is really), is not surprising.

Overall, the LA Weekly has morphed into the LA Times, with porn and tattoo ads, and promoting silly, noisy rock bands.

If left-liberal bloggers have any influence on the Democratic party, they should use their muscle right now to block a grotesque sellout–handing Republicans an odious victory on the inheritance tax.

Giving the GOP its way would hand a fabulous reward to the country’s wealthiest families but, worse than that, create a $1 trillion hole in future federal revenue. If this happens, forget about universal health care or other major social reforms and public investment that Democrats are promising to pursue.

Yet leading the rush to appeasement is Senator Max Baucus of Montana, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee and the party’s number-one Quisling.Baucus tips over easily to outrageous deals with Republican tax-cutters. Back in 2001, he sold out on Bush’s reactionary tax reduction package.Now he is working to organize a rump group of Democratic senators for “compromise” on the estate tax.That is, give the Republican sponsors most of what they seek and, in the process, cripple possibilities for the future.

Democrats do not need do anything about the estate tax at this point since the Bush version expires automatically in 2011. Let the next president decide what to recommend.For now, Dems merely need to hold the 40 votes to sustain a filibuster. The caucus overwhelmingly supports that position. The problem is the handful of potential deserters.

The first chore for activists is to bang on Baucus– quickly and mercilessly– because a Senate vote is expected next week. More to the point, grassroots Democrats need to bang on the handful of wobbly Democratic senators disposed to go along with Senator Sellout or flirting with the idea. These include the two Nelsons (Bill of Florida, Ben of Nebraska), Salazar of Colorado, Lincoln and Pryor of Arkansas and– most shocking– Washington’s two usually progressive senators, Cantwell and Murray. Their state includes a bunch of techie billionaires and the family-owned Seattle Times that hammers them on the supposed injustice of the estate tax. They need to know a price will be paid for defection.

The second great task for grassroots Dems is to confront the party leaders on their own cowardly acquiescence.Why do they allow this one disloyal rogue to undercut the party’s position and yet escape any punitive consequences?If Democrats should win back Senate control this year, Baucus will become Finance Committee Chairman again–free do more outrageous tax favors for his wealthy pals.

The Democratic caucus and minority leader Harry Reid ought to inform Baucus– right now– that, if he proceeds with this sellout, he can forget about ever being chairman again. [Empasis comes from DWT.]The legislative fight may sound like inside baseball and it is, but this is a central test of character for the party.If incumbent Democrats are unwilling to upset their “club” by punishing this wayward jerk on such a decisive matter, then maybe the “club” deserves to retain its minority status.

Thanx so much for hosting Howie’s weekly pieces. Few, if any, of us have the time to do what he’s doing…. finding the races where we can make a difference, and highlighting them.

And Howie, speaking of which…..Personally, I’d rather see a post about Donna Edwards NOW than closer to the MD primary. One reason I didn’t wind up giving to Winograd last week was that it would be “late money” to a candidate whose chances were indistinct…

With limited funds, I’d much rather send in “early money” to establish a candidate’s credibility as soon as possible.

But maybe that’s just me! :)

From the top of the relevant Google search page:

Results 1 – 10 of about 119,000 for lieberman cloture. (0.17 seconds)