
(Update: Ned will be over at Kos taking questions at 7pm EDT/4pm PDT, stop by and say hello.)
The NYT has some very encouraging words on Ned:
Ned Lamont has already shown that his candidacy should be taken seriously. On May 19, a third of the delegates to the Democratic state convention voted to endorse him instead of Senator Joseph I. Lieberman.
Now, with just over two months until he faces the senator in the Aug. 8 primary, Mr. Lamont hopes to defy polls, political experts and the calendar and win the nomination. To do so, he must greatly expand on the support he has won for voicing opposition to Senator Lieberman's support for President Bush on key aspects of the war in Iraq.
Mr. Lamont's skills as a campaigner, some political observers say, are critical to accomplishing his goal. They cite his high energy, his sharp wit and his knowledge of issues, and his ability to convince voters that he is a legitimate challenger. His great wealth and his willingness to use it also cannot hurt.
"Once you scratch and sniff, you realize he would be a very credible senator, and that makes him a very credible candidate," said George Jepsen, the immediate past chairman of the Democratic State Central Committee. "If he was a nut, Joe wouldn't have a problem. But he's intelligent. He's accomplished. There are no personal warts. He teaches in the Bridgeport public schools. How many people of his pedigree and background go do that?"
Mr. Jepsen, who supported Senator Lieberman in past races, has not taken a public position in the primary. He is among many Democrats, however, who predict that voters who are angry with Mr. Lieberman are likely to turn out in great numbers in the primary. The senator, he said, is "genuinely threatened on Aug. 8."
My favorite part? How Lieberman's defenders try to come to his rescue:
Some political experts and some supporters of Senator Lieberman point to polls showing that he remains popular in the state, even if he is more popular among Republicans than he is among Democrats. They also note his high ratings from liberal interest groups and his support among prominent elected Democrats.
I think I get it -- his own party hates him, his support among "prominent elected Democrats" comes from people he's threatened to withhold campaign funds from, the grassroots "interest groups" in Connectict have largely turned their backs on Holy Joe and the only support he's been able to get comes from DC cocktail weenie fiends totally out of touch with what's happening in the state. If this is "support," I'd hate to see how they'd trash him.
Meanwhile, Ned's campaign manager Tom Swan sends this today:
This past weekend, as we reflected on the sacrifices made by American service members and their families during wars past and present, Senator Lieberman launched a full-run of television attack ads against Ned Lamont. Just like President Bush did to John Kerry in 2004, the ads are so devoid of context they would make Karl Rove blush. And while their content is highly suspect, the money paying for them is undeniable. This election cycle, Senator Lieberman is the U.S. Senate's top recipient of campaign contributions from the defense industry, second largest recipient of pharmaceutical manufacturer donations, and has collected over $1 million from political action committees. From now until the end of the campaign, every time you see a Joe Lieberman advertisement, flier, bumper sticker or button, you know who's paying for it.
Our campaign will never match Senator Lieberman's special interest money, and we don't want to. This campaign is a struggle for the heart and soul of our party, and we have relied on a growing army of grassroots Democrats who share the common goals of bringing our troops home from Iraq, healthcare for all Americans, and energy independence. That's why over 8,000 individuals have contributed and signed up to volunteer in three short months. But we need your help again. It's not about the amount you can give, it's about adding your voice to the thousands more who share our vision of progress.
You can donate here .
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Fitzy Ned!
FITZ!
and
NED
al-Scooter’s back in town. Is Fitz?
I was really happy to see this in the NYT. Ned is gonna do it. Time for another donation.
Domino # one is about to topple over..
Yeah, but what about his marriage? Why hasn’t the NY Times given us a breakdown of exactly how much time he spends with his wife, etc.?
/snark
Ned’s gonna be a Lamontster come August 8th.
Joe can always get a job on FNC. He and Ann Coulter could play footsie under the coffee table on Fox and Friends. Then again, that might be a dangerous game to play with Little Miss Pointy Pumps.
I have to disagree with Tom Swan — there is NOTHING that would make Karl Rove blush.
Well, maybe if “Tiny” asks for a date in the prison showers, but anything political — no way.
al-scooter 7 — that made my dog barf.
I’ve always wanted someone to play that “every time you see my opponent’s buttons/bumper stickers/TV ads, now you know who paid for them” card! What better way to take an opponent’s financial advantage and turn it against him? (I still wish Gore or Kerry had done that when they were financially outgunned by both Bush campaigns…)
You got me to contribute to his campaign through the Act Blue link, and I even “tipped” Act Blue. Very clever.
Way Off Topic
Re: Monday Late Nite FDL - Mo’ Music
Jane (and others interested) -
At the end of this post is a link to a Web site streaming live recordings from Fillmore - all Fillmore live, all the time.
I just learned of this site a few weeks ago, and I haven’t been able to check what is in its rotation. But just today, I notice that they’ve broadcast CSNY, Joan Baez, and Miles Daves from the late ’60’s and early ’70’s. So what could be the downside?
Who knows - tune in, and you just might catch Duane screeching away through the mists of time.
And if your karma is really good, and if you listen really closely, you might just catch a budding punk rock nitwit, sans undies, getting her own screech on in the background.
We should all be so lucky.
http://www.wolfgangsvault.com/.....amp;nhbx=1
ned will post a diary and be around to respond to comments over at KOS at 7pm this evening. tim taggaris has a nice little diary over there. some day i will learn how to post links.
It’s GJ day- any Fitzy sightings?
Simly copy the url and post it - it should work automatically.
http://www.dailykos.com/user/ttagaris
Thanks,Difficult lawyer! pretty cool listening to Quicksilver and Reading the comments at the same time. Right on.
The Ned Lamont NYT story makes up for the sadly one-sided one about the “Brick Bitch” and her “grassroots-send-a-brick-to-your-Congressperson” campaign.
It’s GJ day- any Fitzy sightings?
Only in our dreams…..sigh.
Out of curiousity though, anyone know when this GJ’s term expires?
And btw, anyone know if Rove ain’t gonna be charged, will he be publicly exonerated? Fitz made a big point at the press conference that he doesn’t talk about people unless they’re being charged, so isn’t it possible we may never, ever hear anything?
Sigh…..
OK folks, it’s crunch time. Jomentum is not dead yet, and Lamont will need money from all of us. Lamont has become our most visible symbol, our most tangible figure for real change fueled by the net roots. One of our most important jobs right now is to send Ned’s campaign some green stuff.
As has been noted many times on this site: Early Money Is The Most Effective Money. Politics is about momentum and the more momentum Ned gets the more unstoppable he becomes and the more influential we become. DO IT NOW.
My God, we have an actual winning candidate on our hands.
I’m a supporter of Lamont and a probable donor to his campaign. I am quite satisfied with his domestic stands. But, there is one question, an imperative one, at least for me. And that is, if he were to replace Lieberman, how exactly would he treat the “special relationship” between the governments of the United States and Israel regarding the Palestinian “question”? For it has been my contention that until the Israeli/Palestinian situation is settled, there will be no peace in the Middle East. I’ve not been able locate Mr. Lamont’s position on this most critical issue. Would he, if elected have a more objective and freer approach to this baffling conflict? Or would it be more of the same, stale, status quo, Lieberman-Bush non-solution, solutions? I truly believe it is a legitimate inquiry, as I am very concerned that if we (the U.S. and Israel) continue down the present path, a nuclear world war may await.
Tug (21):
He has the potential, yes! but he’s not going to get there unless we help him in areal way.
If I can recommend anything, it’s that we begin getting very serious about telling people who Ned Lamont is. He needs multiple, repetitive introductions. It’s not even about Holy Joe anymore, in a way. It’s about Ned, Ned, Ned.
Does anybody have any links to polls in Connecticut? I’m curious to know where the 2 stand among Democrats likely to vote in the Primary.
Pach 24
All Ned
All the Time
dOn
Here’s the only polling I can find on the race- Rasmussen- 5/05
Senator Joe Lieberman (D) has angered many Democrats for his position on Iraq and his relationship with the Bush Administration. Despite that, the incumbent is well positioned to win another term in Washington.
Lieberman leads businessman Paul Streitz (R) 59% to 23% in a general election match-up.
However, Lieberman faces a stiff challenge from within his own party. Ned Lamont has raised the banner for those disaffected with Lieberman and mounted a more serious challenge than initially expected. Lieberman has not ruled out an Independent bid for the Senate if Lamont were to win the nomination.
In that case, Lieberman would win 47% of the vote, Lamont 20%, and Streitz 17%. Those numbers are similar to our previous poll on this match-up.
Lieberman’s support from Republicans and unaffiliated voters changes little whether he runs as a Democrat or an Independent.
The impact among Democrats is quite different. Running as the party’s standard bearer, Lieberman attracts 68% of the vote from the party faithful. However, if Lamont is the Democratic nominee, Lieberman earns just 43% of the vote from Democrats in the state. Lamont gets 32%.
The deadline for filing to run as an Independent is the day after the Democratic Primary. In practical terms, because of petition signature requirements, Lieberman would have to begin preparation for filing as an Independent before the Democratic Primary.
Lieberman also leads Lamont by 20 percentage points in a Primary Election match-up.
rwcole 27 — those pollling numbers are old, long before the convention when Ned’s awareness was relatively low. It’s taken off since then. I seriously doubt they still hold.
Jane–Yes they’re three weeks old. It’s all I can find. Have you seen anything more recent?
Lobstergirl
I don’t think this will end with a defeaning silence. Fitz is not irresponsible. He would not leave the nation (or Rove) in limbo forever.
Don’t worry, it will all happen in it’s own good time.
Jane #9:
Maybe Kobe’ll feel better if you ask him to visualize Joe having to undergo a rabies series after meeting his former constituent. Those puncture wounds don’t heal themselves, ya know!
FFFFFFIIIIIIITTTTTTTZZZZZ! Where are you? It’s been ages. Tell us what you’re up to! Give us a sign. A word. A filing. A motion. An indictment or two. Anything. Just so we know you’re still out there fightin’ crime.
These ads are indeed a mark of Joe’s desperation, and they’ll get worse. Ned is a multi-mega-millionaire with a library at Harvard named for his family. Joe won’t let Connecticut Democrats forget any of that.
Joe’s already tested the “he can buy as many Senate seats as he wants to” line. Our netroots support for Ned is critical. Ned’s campaign cannot allow itself to be painted as a millionaire’s vanity quest; our $$$ change that story fast.
Additionally, this “take Ned seriously” NYT writeup is a shot across the bow of the campaign. Rovian wingnut swarm, ahoy!
=============
Had enough?
=============
So can anyone tell me how being “more popular among Republicans than he is among Democrats” is going to help Joe in a DEMOCRATIC primary? It’s not like a bunch of republicans are gonna show up to vote for him, even if the primary is open. By the way, are the CT primaries open or closed?
Thanks to all for the polling links, but it sounds like there is nothing publically available at least since the State Democratic Convention. Judging from Lieberman’s attack ads, I’d say his campaign is privy to some internal polls that they don’t like.
I’ll help with the ouster of Joementum, if you all promise to help me defeat Kyl here in AZ.
Re: the poll numbers
I can’t see it falling out that way.
If he’s going to run as an independent, he’ll have to telegraph his intent long before the primary, which he will therefore loose.
Consequently, he’ll wind up splitting the Republican vote (which the quote notes, in saying that an independent run won’t hurt him with the Republicans, but doesn’t follow to its logical conclusion).
This will put Ned in office.
His “best” strategy would be to fight Ned for the primary and drop out if he doesn’t win, in the hopes that this might let a like-minded Republican get in where he failed.
–MarkusQ
Difficult Lawyer - Thanks for the link. James Taylor on now. Eagerly awaiting It’s a Beautiful Day.
not in the spirit of this particular post, but Kos highlights this:
Conason on the NY Times’ tabloid “journalism”:
al-Scooter — that was Lucy. Kobe’s still baked on pain pills.
Dadhusker 36 — we’d love to help with Kyl. Haven’t gotten into it much yet due to the primaries, but please send good links, local blogs covering the race, etc. we’d love to help.
Belatedly:
Hi, Teddy!!!
mbrain:
It’s a Beautiful Day. I saw those guys in 1969 at a little club called “The Family Dog” down by the ocean, near Playland in San Francisco. Those were the beautiful days! Hadn’t thought about that group in a lotta years. Such gooood music.
How Republican is Connecticut, and how much of the Republican vote has gone to Joe in prior general elections?
If Lamont makes it to the general election, how likely is he to pull any GOP vote, especially if Lieberman should go independent? I think I agree that as an independent, Lieberman is more ikely to split the GOP vote than the Democratic vote, but I haven’t figured out the logistics of Lieberman being prepared to go independent in the time fram within which he needs to present valid petitions.
While running errands today, I caught bits and pieces of Talk of the Nation doing a political round up. After coming back to my car at one stop and turning on the radio, the guest was saying something about Lieberman and McCain both being disliked/distrusted by their own parties - and thus, potentially an interesting presidential ticket.
No idea about the ID of the speaker or the context of the remark, and before I could get more info my 4 year old demanded dad’s attention. At any rate, it struck me as about as off the wall as it gets. Let’s see: the likeliest voters on both sides don’t care for either of them, so that makes them attractive?
Talk about strategery. Let’s hear it for straightforward progressive candidates like Ned. Love that “when you see the buttons, you know who paid for them”!!
Our money, and Ned’s campaign, won’t convince Joe to drop out to run as an independent, but I bet really bad poll numbers could get him going hat-in-hand to Mr. Kiss, looking for a job. SecDef? Veep?
The McCain/Lieberman ticket logic seems like something Ombudswoman Howell would cook up: gee, everybody hates us, we must be doing great!
The GJ is for 18 months, yes? The last one ended on October 28 or 29, so there’s lots of time left for this one.
Kiddo, the best person to ask about Lamont stuff is Bob Adams, he can be found in the blogroll under “connecticut bob”. He’ll get you an answer.
He also said they expect polling data on the race by the end of this week, I think.
Jane, I wanted to personally thank you for Duane the other night. I went to youtube last night and watched a bunch of old doors and santana, along with my current insane passion for PearlJam. My boys were never really into them, but I feel possessed, have been listening to “ten” nonstop since Gyro posted the link to the Letterman concert. But in my life, nothing can compare to the Allman Brothers live, soaring guitars and the perfection of the percussion. You made a lot of folks very happy.
Oklahoma Kiddo: So tired I don’t think that I can make it… The Family Dog - I’ve heard about that place. Moved from California to DC in 67, missed all the action. Never got to see them live, but had their eponymous album and wore the grooves out.
Man, the Vault Radio store has Fillmore posters that I had once upon a time, now selling (some of them) for up to $10,000 (for a Cream poster). Wish I’d been more of a keeper.
zennurse 48 — that YouTube can be addictive. I can get lost over there myself…glad you enjoyed Duane. I’ll happily share him ;)
re Fitz and Rove being “exonerated”
This was a requirement for the Independent Prosecutor. But Fitz has no obligation to “exonerate” anyone that he is investigating. That is why the GJ is supposed to be secret.
Things are heating up here in CT. The local bloggers are starting to question the HRC endorsement of Holy Joe, especially now that Chimpy is making noises like he wants an anti-gay marriage amendment.
And I’ve got two new Lamont videos on my blog; I spent 5 hours editing, but it was fun so I didn’t mind.
Hi Zennurse! Yes, AFAIK there will be new numbers shortly; I’ll keep a lookout for them. It’s a whole new ballgame post-convention.
“the only support he’s been able to get comes from DC cocktail weenie fiends totally out of touch with what’s happening”
Cocktail weenie FIENDS? Don’t know if that’s a (Freudian) slip/typo or not, but it’s a great line. And thanks for a consistently stimulating website.
Both McCain and Lieberman are party vote splitters, so as ‘wedge candidates’ they have ’swing’ power. If one comes out strong, they other plays the spoiler for the opposing party.
At least thats my impression of the “on the one hand” and “on the other hand” estimations of the potential future roles of McCain and Lie-berman.
Since both are proven puppets for Neo-con interests, at a party level, their value as vote splitting ’swing’ candidates means its win-win for the neo-cons.
Hopefully Ned will upset that particular
fantasystrategy.A while back, a request was made for info about Joe’s funding sources. At the time I knew I had some information but couldn’t recall where I’d seen it. I see it’s mentioned here again. Since I found it again…
“Executives at ChoicePoint Inc. - which bought the company whose list Florida officials used to prevent thousands from voting in the 2000 presidential election - were among the biggest contributors to U.S. Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman’s re-election campaign from January to March, records show.”
http://www.journalinquirer.com.....d=16608288
Hope this helps.
ct bob 52
your videos are great. loved the convention where each town sounded off. very moving. keep it coming.
a bit OT, but since some commentators are hungering for a little Justice today, some good news:
Ohio Coingate operator Tom Noe just pled guilty to 3 counts:
http://tinyurl.com/m9nwo
Pete (57) thanks!
But credit for the convention roll call goes to Spazeboy over at the “Ned Lamont Resource”; he’s the one that sat down and made the dozens of edits for the 167-town roll call.
http://www.laresistance.us/blo.....-round-up/
Wow, AY56, that link is a rollcall of corruption.
New Yahoo headline:
“Bush troubled by reports of Iraq killings”
Anybody who thinks the MSM ain’t pimping for Bush just has to read that headline - not “SAYS he’s troubled” but apparently just it’s an undisputed fact - “HE IS troubled.”
Guess the reporter has looked into his soul, huh? Read his mind?
Here’s Joe Lieberman: Droopy, Rape Gurney Joe, Joementum, W’s favorite democrat, Big pharma whore, defense industry whore, corporate shill, lover of W’s tax cuts for the wealthy, Gang of 14 sellout.
Votes with thugs for cloture on Alito, whiny voice (sorry for the ad hominem, but his voice is truly nauseous), Kisses and hugs Dubya, loves the Iraq WOT, stabs his party in the back, down on women and gays, anti-reproductive rights for women, panders to religious right, he is generally a pilondial cyst on the ass of the Democratic Party.
Note he is ‘troubled’ by the ‘reports’, not the killings.
Teddy,
I know!
Can you imagine my chagrin when I finally remembered? EEESH!
Since I was the one who began the pun-ball rolling on the “Unleash the Wingnuts” thread w/the “stupid cracks about molting” (your description of same), I felt compelled to reply.
It’s at No. 193 on the “Unleash the Wingnuts” thread.
No interest in starting a flame war here, just thought you might be characterizing matters in a rather uncharitable and hypocritical manner (i.e. “OK for thee [i.e. Jane] but not for me [i.e. me and others who picked up the pun-ball”).
everhopeful –
It’s been mentioned before, but needs to be repeated — Bush is troubled by reports of the killings, not the killings themselves.
mbrain:
“So tired I don’t think that I can make it…”
“White bird must fly, or she will die…”
Wonderful stuff! Wonderful times.
rw, you haven’t given us any new numbers on Bush recently, have you? I’ve admittedly been doing a little skimming, so I may have missed it. I’d be interested, and rely on you a bit to keep me current.
Also, has anyone seen the articles about a number of KS pols jumping parties from them to us? in Kansas??? I think that says a lot about how Bush is playing in Topeka, if not Peoria.
zennurse says:
May 31st, 2006 at 2:01 pm
The GJ is for 18 months, yes? The last one ended on October 28 or 29, so there’s lots of time left for this one.
But I’m pretty sure this current GJ was already seated when Fitz announced that he needed to present more evidence. We don’t know when they were seated.
mikey at 51
I know he is not require to exonerate anyone, nor do I believe there will be a need/opportunity for him to exonerate Rove.
Nonrtheless, I don’t think he will leave the nation or any of the targets/subjects/witnesses hanging about their status beyond the time needed to complete his investigation.
He is not an asshole. These are people’s lives and careers, he won’t leave them twisting for no good reason.
I’ve looked into his eyes and read his soul. He is most definitely not troubled by either a.)the reports or b.) the actual deaths.
Why on earth would he be troubled by any deaths at this f****ing point? Media Whores are, yet again, ever vigilant…
Also, DifficultLawyer, thanks for the link to wolfgang, what a great find. I’m sending it to a few folks who will treasure it as well.
Leisure Guy, I saw your interchange with NathanfromNebraska on the Sirotablog yesterday. His Fugue and Variations on the word fuck and your quote from Robert Graves. LMAO!
Zenn- There haven’t been new numbers on Bush for a while. We are in a holiday week- and many pollsters don’t like to pull data during such periods- but I’ll pass on anything I see.
It will probablyh be mid week next week before we get anything meaningful. By then we’ll also have some primary results and know what happened in Bilbray v. Busby.
zennurse @ 68
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/.....700196.htm
looseheadprop @70:
But he said at his October presser that he was not obligated to issue a report, and furthermore that he thought this was a good thing.
Sent in a small contribution. I will be worth it just to see Holy Joe sweat, and wonderful to see him lose.
Thanks for posting the contribution button.
Oh, Lobstergirl, I didn’t realize that they were already seated. Thanks for clarifying. I wonder how we can find out when they do end, then. Maybe lhp or Mary might know, or Christy. I think that’s pretty important info.
Zenn- I have read the Kansas reports and heard a brief but interesting discussion on NPR this morning. Apparently the Kansas Gooper party has been taken over by the far right- and many goopers are jumping ship- including the former state president of the party who is joining the dem governor as running mate in the election.
There is apparently a serious SPLIT in the party in Kansas- with the moderates pissed as hell at the hard right wingers who are now in control. Don’t know how it is likely to shake out.
BradBlog Alert –
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002891.htm
A damning and detailed feature article, written by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., for Rolling Stone, documenting evidence of the theft of the 2004 Presidential Election is set to hit newstands this Friday, The BRAD BLOG can now confirm. The online version of the article will be posted tomorrow (Thursday) morning.
The article, which has been several months in development, will contend that a concerted effort was undertaken by high-level Republican officials to steal the Election in Ohio — and thus the country — in 2004!
Kennedy told The BRAD BLOG this morning that “the best evidence says the Republicans succeeded” in their plan.
He writes in the article, and confirmed to us today, that evidence shows Ohio Sec. of State J. Kenneth Blackwell was “certainly in on” the scheme, and “there are indications that the effort went all the way up to the White House.” …
…DEVELOPING VERY HARD…
Heckermill at 65
I (thought I ) said I LIKED the puns? Didn’t I?
I also said, that I was as guilty as anyone of making up snarky nicknames. I don’t have a problem with that.
It was the outright, striaghtfoward ad hominum attacks and the descent into name calling (which is the evil, puposeless, non clever cousin of snarky nicknames)
Puns=clever/good
namecalling=counterproductive/lacking in imagination
No, brother, by all means pun on.
From the link on Kansas Politics above- it appears that there are quite a few goopers who now realize that only hard righters can win primaries in Kansas- so they are becoming dems to face the hard righters in the general election where they have a much better chance of winning. It will be interesting to see if this becomes a trend. It would be strange to see Kansas turn blue- with an army of ex goopers running the show. Could happen.
Jane #50:
Poor Lucy! It must be a bad time for poodles. One of my wife’s friends had to hospitalize her standard with pneumonia last Friday. As we’re much closer to the vet hospital than she is, my wife has begun twice-a-day visits. They seem to be improving morale.
So here’s to all the poodles getting well and all the guardians returning to “normal” lives! And I’ll be more cautions with my post content.
RE: new Kansas ‘Dems’
I know it sounds good to have republicans change parties, but is it really a win for democrats? I’m not sure if this is good news or not. Their stands on issues haven’t changed, so I’m not sure what to think. I guess if it means defeating the far right in Kansas, it’s good. Right?
Fair enough. Wasn’t disputing whether you liked puns or not.
Somehow I thought myself implicated in the freeperization of America. Not sure how I got that impression, exactly, but I apparently became confused by the following:
Since I was the one who started the puns on molting in that thread, somehow I got the impression you meant me.
How silly of me.
No worries. I apologize for taking it up.
Lobstergirl at 76
He was refering to a report like the Starr Report (which I bought a Barnes & Noble at the time). If you haven’t read the Starr Report, well let me tell you it is one doozy of a bodice ripper novel. It should have that guy from the “i can’t believe it’s not butter” commercials on the front cover.
Fitz is so, so right. It is a good thing he is not required to issue his own version of the Starr Report. For one thing 95% of it would probably have to be redacted for national security purposes. It would be unreadable and a disaster. I can’t think of any way it could be written that would be fair, not misleading, yet not compromise a whole truckload of naitonal security secrets.
Christy, if you’re still around, I left a comment in the “Even Neocons …” thread. Kinda goes along with my observation last night that you’d think the smart neocons would be having doubts about their theories about now. I guess some of them are …
While dems continue their long wait to regain power- goopers are preparing for a battle of their own.
The right is faced with some uncontrovertible facts:
1) George Bush is one of theirs.
2) George Bush has governed as a member of the hard right- and followed the holy grail of conservative thought in every decision he has made.
3) George Bush has made an absolute hash of things- and they are poised to get worse rather than better.
It’s not just Iraq- it’s the economy stupid. It’s deficits. It’s failed government at every level.
The scary thing for goopers is that they are going to get laughed off the stump if they keep quoting Clusterfuck (read gooper) talking points. This is a VERY serious gooper problem.
America gave the Rushmobile a test ride- and it’s lyin in the ditch spinning it’s wheels.
Gonna need a total remodel.
TeddySanFran #33 — Ned’s family is responsible for Lamont Library? The library that did not permit undergraduate women to use it, back when I was at Radcliffe? Of course, that was just one of several examples of sexual apartheid at Harvard back then, all of which left me with enough residual anger that I still refuse to give Harvard money. I give to the Radcliffe Institute, but Harvard can pound sand. Oh, well, Ned is way too young to have had anything to do with that, so I won’t hold it against him. He’s certainly good on women’s issues, unlike Joementum. One contribution to Lamont coming up.
Just nipped over to HufPo to try to snag us that “A Little LESS the Matter with Kansas?” story again, zennurse — but instead I got snagged myself, laffin’ at this one:
“Explained: The GOP Obsession With Gays”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....21938.html
A certain doctor/senator prolly ain’t liking the new term “a Fristy” rill good. Heh.
Interesting point, NumberFour, but I would expect kansas dems to be pretty moderate, so it is surely possible these are moderate republicans who want to see some integrity and peace in Congres. If so, I’m all for that, at least it’s a start in a state that is redder than red. I don’t think we would expect that they would become progressive overnight; if they are finding enough common ground to run as ticket-mates, then they will hopefully defeat the hard right which can only be good for bipartisanship, imo.
BarbaraB at 89,
Lamont Library…helped determine my fate. I refused to apply to a university that had a boys-only library. National Merit Scholar. Their loss.
But I don’t hold it against Ned. In fact I have sent the maximum donation for the primary. Will donate again when he wins!
RWCole
I gotta take exception with just one of your premises. Bush has not observed a consistent hard right agenda.
Real Conservatives don’t like big government spending and hate deficit spending. He is a weird hybrid the “tax cut and spend neo con”.
he is not a conservative, he is just a clusterfuck
zennurse, you make good sense. You’re absolutely right about common ground.
BarbaraB: The NYT article states that Ned’s great-grandfather gave money for the Lamont Library, so I don’t think we can blame Ned for their mysogyny (heinous though it was) during your matriculation.
CTBob (52) (59)
Thanks for the credit, the plug, and the link.
Just goes to show that us bloggers in Connecticut cannot be told apart–we’re that on message.
The Bradblog story looks explosive . . . will be on line Rolling Stone tomorrow and on news stands Fri.
OT– Tweety still all over Hill and Bill from the NYT story… it’s an official obsession– he’s nuts.
Yeah- tweety was on hill n bill yesterday. Got pissed when he was told he was bein a gossip.
Lotsu At 90
We gotta make the term a “Fristy” a regular part of the vernacular. Hilarious!
I am flabbergasted at stories about the sexual apartheid at the Lamont Library - I didn’t know it had happened ‘recently’ in the USA. University libraries have traditionally been ‘cruisy’ but making it an all-male library is so over-the-top (so to speak).
lotuslander- the most amazing thing is the radio interview about Lenny in Shark Tale being gay because he doesn’t eat meat and “cross-dresses” as a dolphin and a serious discussion of Rudolf the Red-Nosed reindeer being gay. OMG, how insane, Sam Seder is amazing.
looseheadprop @ 2:56 pm (#93) - He [Bush] is a weird hybrid the “tax cut and spend neo con”.
We on the left sometimes refer to this as “borrow and spend”. Apparently, it’s more responsible than “tax and spend”.
I really wish he would accept paypal, as print-and -mail is kind of a kludge. Any reason why not? thanks,
Mark
Here it comes- the last best hope of goopers to hold the house- the Marriage Amendment- and Clusterfuck’s gonna pitch it personally..
(Washington) President Bush reportedly will hold a Rose Garden press conference on June 5 to press Congress to enact the so-called Federal Marriage Amendment that would ban same-sex marriage.
The conservative Weekly Standard reports that Bush will gather supporters of the amendment behind him as he makes his pitch.
Tweety’s show - his TOTAL obsession with Hillary is tabloid politics most weird and obnoxious…
But I REALLY get PO’d at the weak dems he has on that show - I figure it must be that Hardball “deigns” to allow certain so-called dems on the show ONLY if they agree ahead of time to dish about Hillary with the old panty sniffer himself.
Nothing else explains to me why on earth they don’t just say, “You’re obsessed with Hillary - this is for the tabloids - not political shows for intelligent people. I’m not talking about this stupid stuff so shut the F*** Up!”
new thread - old weenies
rwcole #82: Interesting. I’m hearing rumblings of the same thing here in Virginia. When there’s an open seat (and occasionally when there’s a moderate R incumbent), a wingnut wins the primary and gets stomped in the general election. (The one reliable Achilles’ heel of wingnuts is that no matter what the polls or the voters say, they’re absolutely certain that the vast majority of people agree with their far-right views.)
As the wingers demand absolute loyalty to tenets like their no-tax pledge, we may see more defections by people who care more about having a functional government than ideology. For the most part, I’m inclined to welcome them. (Well, in proper truth-and-reconciliation fashion, those who have “not committed serious crimes.” *g*)
*ilson — Thank you for the “recently” — I graduated in 1966. (egregious can speak for herself.) At some point in the intervening 40 years, Lamont was desegregated, but it was too late for apologies. I do not, however, hold great-grandsons accountable for the sins of great-grandfathers, or even their more recent relations. Ned is quite obviously living proof that sexism is not hereditary.
Re: # 105
I hope Mary Cheney is happy now. Myabe she can use some of the profits from the 4,000 books she has sold to beat back the effort at mass dehumanization about to be undertaken by her fathers running mate and her political party.
-GSD
rwcole, WaPo had Ned at 13% on April 11 among just Dems. See the link below. That means Ned was 55 points behind on April 11.
Five weeks later in the Primary, May 19, Ned captures 33% of the Dem vote. In about 36 days Liebermann’s lead shrank from 55 points to 34 points, a 21 point switch of registered Dems. Joe’s losing more than half a point every day.
The Rasmussen number, that Ned is 20 points behind on May 5, doesn’t make any sense against the primary numbers. Rasmussen has Ned closer to Joe on May 5 than the actual primary results had Ned on May 19.
What you have taught me is the importance of the slope. The slope of Joe’s decline and Ned’s growth is very, very dramatic. Just going by the slope of the line, if it remains constant, Ned will be ahead of Joe in July?
By Chris Cillizza | April 11, 2006; 1:22 PM ET
“The primary in Connecticut is closed, meaning that only registered Democrats can vote — a rule that should benefit Lamont. But the challenger has a long way to go to be a serious threat to Lieberman. Although no recent polling has been released publicly, a February Quinnipiac University survey showed Lieberman with a 68 percent to 13 percent lead over Lamont….”
I threw this together, so please feel free to check my numeracy.
The connection of Lieberman and choicepoint makes sense when you start looking at the interlocking directorates of many organizations.
I am slowly and painfully putting together a relational database of interlocking directorates where there is some relationship to government posts.
For example, one of the directors of Choicepoint is John J. Hamre, who is also the president and CEO of the Center for Strategic and international Studies.
Please look carefully at the folks on the board.
http://www.csis.org/about/trustees/
And look here for Choicepoint:
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/ph.....l-govboard
There are many other connections among the sets I am working on, interlocked with, for example, Home Depot. It goes on and on, and the web is complex and somewhat scary. Next is connecting the dots between lists on opensecrets and governament contractors, etc.
This is a shorter version of what got EPU’d prior thread at 111.
WaPo had Ned at 13% on April 11 among Dems. That means Ned was 55 points behind on April 11.
Five weeks later in the CT Primary, May 19, Ned captured 33% of the vote. In about 36 days Liebermann’s lead shrank from 55 points to 34 points. Joe’s losing more than half a point every day. At that rate, 68 days after May 19, July 27, Ned and Joe are tied. If the trend continues after July 27, Ned is up six or seven points on Primary day, August 9.
Please feel free to check my numeracy. This is all based on a continuation of the current trend.