Comments on: Lamont Rocks Steady, Lieberman Runs Scared http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/ Firedoglake weblog Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:38:54 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: mui http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-124032 mui Tue, 30 May 2006 16:27:10 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-124032 <p>Joe really hit rockbottom with that ‘mercial. Oh wait a minute, he hit rockbottom with that Hilary letter, or no maybe he hit rockbottom when . . . oh never mind.</p> Joe really hit rockbottom with that ‘mercial. Oh wait a minute, he hit rockbottom with that Hilary letter, or no maybe he hit rockbottom when . . . oh never mind.

]]> By: professor rat http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123863 professor rat Tue, 30 May 2006 11:55:30 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123863 <p>Congrats to Ned - our underdog and friend. Congrats too to Pach whose post bought out the armchair general’s. At the risk of getting lipstick on the cuffs of our fluffy shirts it’s fun to twist a pigs ear now and then isn’t it. It’s quite telling too what makes the 101st fighting keyboardist’s waddle out to battle.<br /> They hate the constitutional attack and they hate the Phase 2 attack. They hate them because they know deep down that we are right and they are wrong and we will win. They are dying screaming and oh! …the creatures of the night! What sweet music they make!</p> Congrats to Ned – our underdog and friend. Congrats too to Pach whose post bought out the armchair general’s. At the risk of getting lipstick on the cuffs of our fluffy shirts it’s fun to twist a pigs ear now and then isn’t it. It’s quite telling too what makes the 101st fighting keyboardist’s waddle out to battle.
They hate the constitutional attack and they hate the Phase 2 attack. They hate them because they know deep down that we are right and they are wrong and we will win. They are dying screaming and oh! …the creatures of the night! What sweet music they make!

]]> By: Joyful Alternative http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123861 Joyful Alternative Tue, 30 May 2006 10:58:13 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123861 <p>Re Comment 91, I intended to explain to the concern troll how the Pennsylvania Democrats didn’t exactly “unite behind Bobby Casey,” but I forgot that such blogs don’t allow comments, just like their White House.</p> Re Comment 91, I intended to explain to the concern troll how the Pennsylvania Democrats didn’t exactly “unite behind Bobby Casey,” but I forgot that such blogs don’t allow comments, just like their White House.

]]> By: radlib1 http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123844 radlib1 Tue, 30 May 2006 08:19:05 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123844 <p>I think that just the picture of Bush leaning in for a little loving kiss on the cheek with Joe should appear on the screen for about 30 seconds. </p> <p>Then the tag line pops up –</p> <p>“HAD ENOUGH?”</p> <p>LAMONT FOR SENATOR </p> <p>(hat-tip to Teddy SanFran for the line)</p> I think that just the picture of Bush leaning in for a little loving kiss on the cheek with Joe should appear on the screen for about 30 seconds.

Then the tag line pops up –

“HAD ENOUGH?”

LAMONT FOR SENATOR

(hat-tip to Teddy SanFran for the line)

]]> By: fairnbal http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123837 fairnbal Tue, 30 May 2006 08:08:20 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123837 <p>Okay, I know this isn’t supposed to matter and all but hell, Ned is a whole lot easier on the eyes than Joe the bassethound. Oh, and I do like Ned’s standing up and being a real Democrat.</p> Okay, I know this isn’t supposed to matter and all but hell, Ned is a whole lot easier on the eyes than Joe the bassethound. Oh, and I do like Ned’s standing up and being a real Democrat.

]]> By: mui http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123815 mui Tue, 30 May 2006 07:25:13 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123815 <p>BTW Can’t believe that Human Rights, or anyone claiming a name to that, would support torture Joe, gurney Joe or coathanger Joe. Ughh.</p> BTW Can’t believe that Human Rights, or anyone claiming a name to that, would support torture Joe, gurney Joe or coathanger Joe. Ughh.

]]> By: mui http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123811 mui Tue, 30 May 2006 07:19:16 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123811 <p>Defending big pharma against seniors and defending big oil *must* be hard *bipartisan* work, for the two of thems, Joe and Nancy. Mwahaha. I think Joe just outed himself again.</p> Defending big pharma against seniors and defending big oil *must* be hard *bipartisan* work, for the two of thems, Joe and Nancy. Mwahaha. I think Joe just outed himself again.

]]> By: mui http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123807 mui Tue, 30 May 2006 07:14:27 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123807 <p>My mind is now churning. I like the idea of a moveon.org commercial with Nancy Johnson & Joe Lieberman being caught red-handed together.<br /> I wonder what they talk about those two . . . hmmm.</p> My mind is now churning. I like the idea of a moveon.org commercial with Nancy Johnson & Joe Lieberman being caught red-handed together.
I wonder what they talk about those two . . . hmmm.

]]> By: radlib1 http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123806 radlib1 Tue, 30 May 2006 07:14:00 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123806 <p>Just got home and saw Rudy’s post at #33 about the Human Rights Campaign’s support for Lieberman. He’s right. We should all take action. </p> <p>Here’s my little part for tonight –</p> <p>Dear Human Rights Campaign,</p> <p>Please rethink your backing of Lieberman.</p> <p>If you care at all about the human right to live, please see Lieberman’s strong, unyielding support for Bush’s War on Iraq. The people there are now in a civil war that the United States and Bush and Lieberman set in motion with an unnecessary, preemptive strike. Tens of thousands of innocent Iraqi citizens and nearly 3000 Americans soldiers have lost their lives in this bloody debacle. Lieberman is a chickenhawk who never served a day in uniform and yet is more than willing to send young Americans to die for a lie (Saddam Hussein is not now nor ever has been Osama bin Laden).</p> <p>Lamont is against the War on Iraq. Period.</p> <p>Lieberman claims to be pro-choice for women, yet he voted for cloture, along with the Republicans, to pack the Supreme Court with an anti-choice justice, Sam Alito. He is in favor of pro-life (anti-choice) license plates for Connecticut. His new nickname is “Rape Gurney Joe” because he says hospitals shouldn’t have to give morning-after pills to rape victims — they can always go to another hospital. Whoa! Whaaa’s that about?</p> <p>Lamont, on the other hand, is solidly pro-choice, pro women’s rights. He would’ve filibustered and voted against cloture for Alito.</p> <p>Think about it. Do you really want to support a war lover who won’t fight for women’s rights?</p> <p>Do the right thing for yourselves and for the rest of us. Support Ned Lamont for U.S. Senate.</p> <p>Sincerely,</p> Just got home and saw Rudy’s post at #33 about the Human Rights Campaign’s support for Lieberman. He’s right. We should all take action.

Here’s my little part for tonight –

Dear Human Rights Campaign,

Please rethink your backing of Lieberman.

If you care at all about the human right to live, please see Lieberman’s strong, unyielding support for Bush’s War on Iraq. The people there are now in a civil war that the United States and Bush and Lieberman set in motion with an unnecessary, preemptive strike. Tens of thousands of innocent Iraqi citizens and nearly 3000 Americans soldiers have lost their lives in this bloody debacle. Lieberman is a chickenhawk who never served a day in uniform and yet is more than willing to send young Americans to die for a lie (Saddam Hussein is not now nor ever has been Osama bin Laden).

Lamont is against the War on Iraq. Period.

Lieberman claims to be pro-choice for women, yet he voted for cloture, along with the Republicans, to pack the Supreme Court with an anti-choice justice, Sam Alito. He is in favor of pro-life (anti-choice) license plates for Connecticut. His new nickname is “Rape Gurney Joe” because he says hospitals shouldn’t have to give morning-after pills to rape victims — they can always go to another hospital. Whoa! Whaaa’s that about?

Lamont, on the other hand, is solidly pro-choice, pro women’s rights. He would’ve filibustered and voted against cloture for Alito.

Think about it. Do you really want to support a war lover who won’t fight for women’s rights?

Do the right thing for yourselves and for the rest of us. Support Ned Lamont for U.S. Senate.

Sincerely,

]]> By: mui http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123800 mui Tue, 30 May 2006 07:06:16 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/29/lamont-rocks-steady-lieberman-runs-scared/#comment-123800 <p>Ohmigod. Nancy Johnson. Don’t get me started. She’s the evil medicare D big pharma congresscritter who walks in disguise as a nice grannie. Maybe we should ask a rhetorical question of Joe Lieberman: critter Joe, will you support Dem opponent of Nancy Johnson, Chris Murphy?<br /> Ah forget it. It seems like we know the answer to that. Big pharma congresscritters stick to each other on both sides of the aisles.</p> Ohmigod. Nancy Johnson. Don’t get me started. She’s the evil medicare D big pharma congresscritter who walks in disguise as a nice grannie. Maybe we should ask a rhetorical question of Joe Lieberman: critter Joe, will you support Dem opponent of Nancy Johnson, Chris Murphy?
Ah forget it. It seems like we know the answer to that. Big pharma congresscritters stick to each other on both sides of the aisles.

]]>