
From the one-for-the-good-guys-department: Bloomberg reports that FCC Chairman Kevin Martin has ordered a probe of dozens of television stations, for airing advertisements as if they were vetted news reports. Martin’s stellar move to ferret out fake news offenders comes one month after the indefatigable folks at the Center for Media and Democracy issued a ten-month-in- the-making report into the propaganda puffery. From Bloomberg:
The April report by the non-profit Center for Media and Democracy found at least 77 stations, including 23 affiliates of Walt Disney Co.'s ABC networkand seven Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc. stations, ignored an FCC warning to disclose sponsors. The maximum fine for each violation is $32,500, rising to $325,000 for multiple infractions, said FCC spokesman Clyde Ensslin.
The Madison, Wisconsin-based non-profit began their work after a March 2005 report in the New York Times about the prevalence of government-produced propaganda appearing as news. CMD executive director John Stauber said his team was able to capture only about 1% of the thousands of video news releases produced and aired as straight news—without disclaimers—over the last year by corporate and governmental PR firms. It ain’t like they had any help from the TV stations in tracking down these VNRs.
Nope, broadcasters love the free VNRs because then they can lay off the real live, professional journalists, and just hire monkeys to download the pre-packaged video releases, strip’em of disclaimers and present them as the station-produced news of the day. Oh, and pocket the spare change.
Some particularly scary factoids? From the report:
Collectively, these 77 stations reach more than half of the U.S. population. The VNRs and SMTs whose broadcast CMD documented were produced by three broadcast PR firms for 49 different clients, including General Motors, Intel, Pfizer and Capital One. In each case, these 77 television stations actively disguised the sponsored content to make it appear to be their own reporting. In almost all cases, stations failed to balance the clients' messages with independently-gathered footage or basic journalistic research. More than one-third of the time, stations aired the pre-packaged VNR in its entirety.
Stauber is not naïve. He is not demanding that VNRs be outlawed, only that broadcast news directors label them as the PR-propaganda they are. “PR firms produce this stuff and broadcasters literally just plagiarize it, airing the reports as their own. PR firms exist to have their work plagiarized—it’s like ‘Plagiarize me, please! But their work should not be aired as journalistic reports.”
This dirty secret of the broadcast news biz has been hard to prove since VNRs debuted in the late 1980’s. In fact, Radio and Television News Director honcho Barbara Cochran bragged at one point that VNR’s were “kind of like the Loch Ness monster,” in that people talked about them but no one could actually find them.
Stauber’s team managed to surreptitiously capture the 36 VNRs in the study by getting onto various PR firms’ e-alert mailings, which list what’s available each day for downloads…but those channels have dried up since CMD released their report. Stauber hopes to soon find another back channel into naughty newsrooms, to give the FCC more ammunition.
“What we need is one ethical TV producer to act as a whistleblower and feed us these VNRs, but that man or woman has not come forward yet.”
Any takers?
Meantime, to put some people power behind the FCC investigation, visit CMD’s partners over at Free Press, who’ve launched the “No Fake News” campaign.
Graphic from an ad for the broadcast PR firm D S Simon Productions
Login Here
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


RSS/XML Feed
FROOTZ!
Fitz, Feingold & the Red Sox!
Bay State Librul
Fitzaroonie!
Kobe!!!
Sinclair? Fake news? Go on!
Kobe!!!
Bacon!!! Or, rather, in light of the topic of fake news: Beggin’ Strips!!
It will be “news” when it isn’t fake LOL!
Propagandized infomercials. Thanks Jennifer!
I wonder if we’ll see more of this: agencies doing the work they’re mandated to do. They know that someone else will come to power soon, and if they’ve been abject lapdogs, they’re more likely to get tossed.
I would hope that any decent next President would ask his staff on Day One: “Get me a list of everyone Bush appointed to anything.”
Italy will pull 1,100 of its troops from Iraq in June, the new government said Friday, giving its first specific numbers about the planned withdrawal.
“In June we will reduce our troops from 2,700 to 1,600,” Foreign Minister Massimo D’Alema said during an evening television show.
Didn’t either the Daily Show or Colbert Report do a little piece on this issue recently? I could swear that I remember seeing a montage of the same “newsclip” showing up on various networks.
*ilso– coulnd it be another “turning point”?
180 degree turning point !
n. sorry.
I don’t watch television, so I’ve never seen one of these fake news stories. But NPR or PRI did a story on them earlier today and it’s scary to think that this kind of slickly pakaged “reality” can be passed along to an unsuspecting public with little or no oversight.
Oh well, at least I know I’m fully protected from Janet Jackson’s nipple, as well as from a veritable cornucopia of filthy language.
#15, I’m with you on the TV/NPR thing. NPR did a nice story on some fake PSAs by Fannnie May recently, too.
sorta gives a whole nother meaning to “yer either with us or aginst us, heh heh heh” don’t it?
Jennifer, good to have you back on FDL. Thanks for shining some light into the cesspool that is the mainstream media.
Regarding the difficulty of identifying VNRs: does the FCC have subpoena power?
*ilson 10:
Bravo for the Italics!
The net - tomorrows news today!
I would not be at surprised to hear our Fitz leader is having so much fun lurking here that he’s left off dotting the ‘ i’s and crossing the ‘ t’s on all those boring briefs.
See Jane king hit Dick
See Chimpy run
See dogs have lots of fun
Stauber and his crew do great work at the Center for Media and Democracy. I encourage folks to donate and get on their email list.
Imagine my surprise when I read that it was Clear Channel, Viacom and Sinclair…
Agh.
But seriously, we need to begin a dialogue about media policy under a Democratic majority. What does a free press look like (for those of us who have experienced one) and how do we get there from here? I believe we restore the Fairness Doctrine, but in a way that fits today’s technology. I also believe we need to revisit diversity of media by reassessing percentage of ownership of ALL media.
This will be seen as EXTREME by the corporate right-wing, but I believe we also need to develop positions that 1)protect the privacy of individual’s information, and 2) acknowledge access to information is a fundamental human right. Both points will bring down a rain of nuclear snow from industries with vested interest in knowledge management — but it’s OUR information, not theirs, and it’s only their privilege to use it for express purposes with express permission.
Conversely, they may not have access to our attention to manipulate our personal knowledge, understanding and information without our express permission — these “fake news reports” violate that very concept.
What else do we need to address?
Um, if the braodcasters really want some material to plagerize, I believe we could provide some.
“Plagerize THIS, suckah…”
I have to say, I’ve read a LOT of articles, seen on TV, etc. lately many many references to “the blogosphere”–the blogosphere thinks this, thinks that–and although it’s almost always in the tone of “those irrelevant manic x-wingers,” the media is obviously paying attention!
We do have a voice, and it’s a unified voice. Plus, it’s fairly easy for MSM reporters to read the blogs and report on what the blogosphere thinks.
Me thinks our power is growing!
OT
I just saw a brief clip of Chimpy’s recent visit to our southern border. He was wearing a long-sleeved shirt with the sleeves rolled up to his elbows. Why, when he is going to someplace like Yuma, AZ, doesn’t he wear a short-sleeved shirt? Is it because they keep the temperature too low on Air Force 1, or is it because he thinks rolled-up long sleeves make him look more like he’s doing HARD WORK?
Oh yeah, forgot the most important concept: The airwaves are public property, licensed for use at the discretion of the American people.
We need to ensure that ALL Americans understand this, especially as we enter a period of rapid development and change in technology. VNR’s are a violation of that concept if they do not notify the observer of their nature; they capitalize on hiding behind another’s licensure without paying the public for the privilege of that level of access.
We need to have a candid conversation about radio and television as they change from broadcast over publicly owned airwaves to WiFi distribution; will the public understand that advertisers can and will do anything they wish over WiFi since it is not regulated in the same way as traditional airwave-broadcast media?
#26
Hey, I guess that’s the down-side of net neutrality. We’ve got to do our own policing and call it out loud and clear if we see some shady shenanigans…
Yea capitalism!
Welcome back, Jennifer, interesting post and topic.
I don’t watch TV either but this whole concept is so sleazy! I honestly was not aware of it. I used to watch lots of TV but as I began using more discernment about what my teenage son was viewing at a difficult time in his life, I really evaluated how we (he and I) were being influenced by even the better choices. I also became enraged at the rato of commercials to programming and how insipid and insulting most American commercials are. Clearly news programming is a dicey proposition now, but it was the marketing of the elections and then 9/11 that really ended it for me. We flipped around the dial comparing the panic porn and the facial expressions of the newscasters as they were reporting and agreed we were being had. My son still turns on TV when he’s here, but thankfully, he’s as likely to watch ESPN and the History Channel as he is MTV or some other nonsense. We like watching those “I love the 80’s” and the Simpsons together sometimes, and the Red Sox, but it’s been nice to see him choosing other ways to entertain himself.
Please, let me never see the day that the world turns into one, giant commercial, where everything we see is a message that has been carefully crafted by some corporation.
angie says:
May 26th, 2006 at 3:24 pm
*ilso
and
angie says:
May 26th, 2006 at 3:25 pm
n. sorry.
Whew, Angie, I thought *ilson had taken off another letter in protest of the way
* sez *uclear.
mommybrain– I’m still sitting here wondering how the “n” got totally inserted into could. It was a stroke of I know not what…
Rayne, your comment is so clear and concise- wonderful. I love reading you.
At the kickoff for CTG, Markos was talking about the future of media and how we needed a Demchannel, that there should be fairness and choice as the media technology expands. As I said above, there is a lot of TV, but imo very little to choose from for progressives who are looking for programming they can feel good about. I don’t trust most of what I read in newspapers, why would I trust these huge media conglomerates to report news or inform me about the issues I really care about. There are only so many hours in a day for PBS programming and even there, there are programs that don’t interest me. I listen to NPR locally because it is one of the good ones, and I stream other radio online when I want specific programs like Justice Talking, Dem now or PRI. But what I would like is 4 or 5 stations programming a progressive voice for those of us who have brains and who are not permenantly attached to our clickers. Is it the corporate media (again) who is keeping this away from the American Public? I think this would be nothing but good.
Theres a good post over at Steve Gilliards on the slime job being done on the Clintons sex lives. Check it out second thread down from top.
Dear Times editors
I sure would like to see this letter in the Times.
I don’t watch television, either (except for DVD movies).
Do I hear a fourth?
ps, I think this is where politicsTV is going, but wouldn’t it be nice to be able to watch carefully chosen sitcoms and documentaries with commercials for Working Assets, blogs and organic products? How about a progressive cartoon channel or a home show about recycling and chemical free homecare and building?
#33 zennurse
I heard a discussion of the great variety in viewpoints that are provided on satellite radio.
Haven’t tried it, but it sounds great (as an example, they were talking about a GLBT station). It sounds like a progressive entrepeneurial type could do a lot with that…
Jennifer,
OT a wee bit:
Any plans to deliver copies of Glenn’s book to each and every one of our Congressional critters?
Angie - fast brain, slow fingers ;-)
Rayne - A part of that is also campaign finance reform - a equal amount of free airtime for national candidates on both network and cable TV for political advertising; Limit paid advertising to x amount of time.
Tell me what the SC said about political advertising being the equivalent of speech, protected?
It was actually the blogosphere (in the form of Indymedia ) that warned us of powers sought or unsought by the Military-Entertainment complex and the threat this represented to democrats and democracy.
‘ The society of the spectacle ‘
George A 34
Thanks for the link to “Dear Times editors.” It was well worth the trip to go read it. Too bad it is unpublishable in its present form. I hope a lot of people write more letters to the times that make the same points in a more publishable manner.
klevenstein says
May 26th, 2006 at 3:53 pm
Re: one big commercial.
I have read articles with Advertising folk who visualize advertising everywhere they go and imagine this for our future, on the sides of skyscrapers (Times Square), in your cellphone, projected into the night sky. Many cities, to raise money for transportation budgets, are having “commercials” in the form of murals painted on city buses. Boston has done this and while they are creative, they are very much a commercial. You can even get a car if you agree that it will advertise a product, done in much the same way. It’s pretty scary. Makes billboards seem quaint.
Speaking of fake things and beggin’ strips, has anybody seen “Steve don’t eat that?” Wherein Steve eats all kinds of wierd things and writes about it. The beggin strips is volume 3 (scroll down)
http://www.thesneeze.com/mt-ar.....eat_it.php
all the news that’s fit to primp
klevenstein: “Please, let me never see the day that the world turns into one, giant commercial, where everything we see is a message that has been carefully crafted by some corporation.”
We’re pretty close already!
Have you seen the Simpsons episode of the futuristic school?
Electronic Teacher: So if you have three Pepsis, and you take away one Pepsi, how many Pepsis do you have?
Student: Pepsi?
E.T.: Partial credit!
Out here in the Bay Area, there’s an outfit called “Grade the News” that provides an independent check on the local media. It grew out of a local PBS affiliate grant-funded project, and now is located at the San Jose State University J-School and affiliated with the Stanford U. J-School.
Their “mission statement” page is http://www.gradethenews.org/nav/mission.htm
I haven’t done much with GTN, but after reading Jen’s post I want to look into things more. My guess is that the real consumers of these fake news pieces are the local stations who are feeling strapped for resources. They are cheap, easy to use, and don’t compromise your journalistic integrity unless someone notices.
There’s the pressure point to use, if you want to direct some action. No news director wants to be caught on tape saying “Just leave that $100 bill on the nightstand, please.”
Especially if one of their competitors has the tape.
Tucker Carlson, Hannity and Toesuck, Greta Van, Rita Cause, Nancy Grace, Scabro, Lou Mud Dobber, Tweety, Pumkinhaid, and Billo et al are VNR’s (or are VNR-like, anyway) aka the slime oozin’ from your teevee set. Joeseph Goebbels would be proud of the level of brownshirted hairy chested bombast that we have reached.
Punaise 44
VNRs - all the news that’s fit to pimp.
mommybrain - all the news that’s fit to punt
(OT - all that Prince Fitz news? not so much)
Thanks, Jennifer, for posting about our report — which can be read in full at http://www.prwatch.org/fakenews/execsummary
In response to Bonnie (#11) — we were very happy to have the Daily Show (America’s premier fake news source, but they disclose) cover our report recently, in a Lewis Black commentary. Unfortunately, it looks like that clip’s been removed from their website.
In reponse to Neurophius (#18) — it’s my understanding that the FCC would be able to obtain additional information from television stations, though I don’t know if that’s technically a subpoena.
One important point to make here is that the PR firms that put out video news releases use an electronic tracking system to record (and report back to their clients) which stations aired the VNRs when and in what context. If it were possible to make that information public, the outcry would last from here to eternity.
And Rayne (#26) - hear, hear to reclaiming the public airwaves! Always remember that when TV (and radio) stations apply (or re-apply) for their broadcasting license, they promise to serve the public interest and their local community, in exchange for the opportunity to profit off the public airwaves.
– Diane Farsetta
CMD senior researcher and co-author, “Fake TV News: Widespread and Undisclosed”
But, but, but… without VNRs and SMTs, how will we know of the glories of our corporate masters? Surely you wouldn’t expect us to ferret out all their goodness on our own!
Apple case against bloggers overturned on appeal.
http://news.com.com/Apple thwarted in bid to unmask leaker/2100-1047_3-6077547.html
…”Shield law protections
The appeals court pointedly took issue with Apple’s argument that the Web sites were not legitimate journalists. Apple had claimed that the sites were engaged not in “legitimate journalism or news”–but instead in “trade secret misappropriation” and copyright violations.
Judge Conrad Rushing of the California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, who wrote the opinion, said: “We decline the implicit invitation to embroil ourselves in questions of what constitutes ‘legitimate journalism.’” To do otherwise, Rushing warned, would imperil the very values that the First Amendment was intended to protect.
Rushing and his two colleagues went even further, saying that the California reporter’s shield law protects Web publishers–which appears to be the first decision making that status official. “Beyond casting aspersions on the legitimacy of petitioners’ enterprise, Apple offers no cogent reason to conclude that they fall outside the shield law’s protection,” Rushing wrote.”…
——–
Fitz, the no-news prince
all the news that fitz is to print
Um, why are these things so hard to capture. Couldn’t an investigator set up TV recorders in different markets to record newscasts on different stations,
chop them up into video stories, and then look for video stories that match across shows?
The problem (seems to me) is that main stream media beams it’s message to intellectually, almost criminally negligent, main stream Americans, who are too damn lazy-brained to cross-reference outright lies and propaganda. And most Americans appear to like it that way. I blame the citizenry at least as much as the MSM for the mess we’re in. With the availability of the internet and books, etc., there’s just no excuse for it.
Hey, Diane– good on you and your team!
Thanks to Diane for joining us here at firedoglake and expanding on Jennifer’s post. Re:”If it were possible to make that information public, the outcry would last from here to eternity.”, we need a whistleblower, as Jennifer suggests. The blogosphere could take it from there. Can it be that every employee in these companies believes this is fair and honest? How do we recruit this person? What a coup that would be!
I stopped giving to NPR and PBS when Tomlinson came on board and all the people calling me had no clue what I was talking about…or they just pretended. I want my airwaves back– and that means CSPAN too.
Welcome, Diane. Thanks for your good work.
Another OT post, but for those who are following the Chicks, you might be interested in this discussion of the recent TIME cover story and photos at BAGnews Notes:
TIME cover story
Yeah–and whatever happened to Bob Edwards?? That was a tragedy.
re the Chicks: they have to endure Larry King tonite. ;)
Re: The Chicks and Time . . . well that will sell a lot of copies! LOL
angie, Tomlinson’s gone, long gone, take another look at your NPR programming. Here’s a great link for being choosy online. I gove for Fresh Air, This American Life, On Point, Wait, Wait Don’t tell Me, Car Talk, Justice Talking and the BBC. There is much more than just news, NPR may not be perfect, but it offers so much more than Hardball and that blonde woman with the voice.
Count me in with the no-TV crowd. I can barely sit still for a DVD movie. I just don’t like the passivity of being a viewer.
I’m glad I’ve missed most of this. I remember when I first heard rumors that this was happening (I heard it in the early 90s, from some people who were in the PR business), but I didn’t know it had become this pernicious.
I give to Prairie Home Companion, Car Talk and Wait, Wait Don’t Tell Me and The World. LOL, zennurse, I found out how to give to the shows individually.
Bob Edwards has another show, I’ll try to find it for you, I agree, I loved him. Also, Chris Lydon is doing Open Source radio.
Chris Lydon @ Open Source, WGBH, UMass Lowell
http://www.radioopensource.org/
Bob Edwards @ XM radio
Bob Edwards @ XM Satellite Radio
How do you do that, angie? can you do it on the websites? And what’s The World?
angie, forgot that link to PRF=
http://www.publicradiofan.com/
check it out, you can listen to all kinds of stuff, radio netherlands, whatever.
Diane, #50:
They use an electronic tracking device? Hmm.
I’m about as technically apt as a gnu, so I’m no help, but can’t a tracking device be detected somehow? What sort of tracking device? I bet a halfway on the ball teen computer nerd could figure out how to do this.
From far far away, mind you, not in the good old USA where laws might be broken regarding intellectual property.
Ahem….
Speaking of good TV on the internet, John Amato on The Young Turks now…
http://www.theyoungturks.com/
NPR varies across the country, too. My sis gets lots of church music instead of the informative programs in VA…
zennurse– I mail it snailmail and here’s a link to The World:
http://www.theworld.org/
Tomlinson may be gone, but my local NPR’s coverage to date on issues has been sad, sad, sad. Not another dime, especially as long as they have Juan Williams anywhere near a news department.
neurophius #41.. Your welcome. I too would like to see letters like that published in a lot of newspapers, but the MSM has such brown noses or their scared sh*tless it will never happen. Though one can also hope and pray it will.
all the spews that are fit to rinse
OT - the Hayden confirmation vote (just in case anyone hasn’t seen it yet). Glad to see that my senators (Durbin & Obama) voted Nay (and somewhat surprised to see that Specter did as well).
Grouped By Vote Position
YEAs —78
Akaka (D-HI), Alexander (R-TN), Allard (R-CO),
Allen (R-VA), Baucus (D-MT), Bennett (R-UT),
Biden (D-DE), Bingaman (D-NM), Bond (R-MO),
Brownback (R-KS), Bunning (R-KY), Burns (R-MT),
Burr (R-NC), Byrd (D-WV), Carper (D-DE),
Chafee (R-RI), Chambliss (R-GA), Coburn (R-OK),
Cochran (R-MS), Coleman (R-MN)
Collins (R-ME), Cornyn (R-TX), Craig (R-ID),
Crapo (R-ID) DeMint (R-SC), DeWine (R-OH),
Domenici (R-NM), Ensign (R-NV),
Enzi (R-WY), Feinstein (D-CA), Frist (R-TN),
Graham (R-SC), Grassley (R-IA), Gregg (R-NH),
Hagel (R-NE), Hatch (R-UT), Hutchison (R-TX),
Inhofe (R-OK), Isakson (R-GA), Jeffords (I-VT),
Johnson (D-SD), Kohl (D-WI), Kyl (R-AZ),
Landrieu (D-LA), Lautenberg (D-NJ), Leahy (D-VT),
Levin (D-MI), Lieberman (D-CT),
Lincoln (D-AR), Lott (R-MS), Lugar (R-IN),
Martinez (R-FL), McCain (R-AZ), McConnell (R-KY),
Mikulski (D-MD), Murkowski (R-AK), Murray (D-WA),
Nelson (D-FL), Nelson (D-NE) Pryor (D-AR),
Reed (D-RI), Reid (D-NV), Roberts (R-KS)
Santorum (R-PA), Sarbanes (D-MD), Schumer (D-NY),
Sessions (R-AL), Shelby (R-AL), Smith (R-OR),
Snowe (R-ME), Stabenow (D-MI), Stevens (R-AK),
Sununu (R-NH), Talent (R-MO), Thomas (R-WY)
Vitter (R-LA), Voinovich (R-OH), Warner (R-VA)
NAYs —15
Bayh (D-IN), Cantwell (D-WA), Clinton (D-NY),
Dayton (D-MN), Dodd (D-CT), Dorgan (D-ND),
Durbin (D-IL), Feingold (D-WI), Harkin (D-IA),
Kennedy (D-MA), Kerry (D-MA), Menendez (D-NJ)
Obama (D-IL), Specter (R-PA), Wyden (D-OR)
Not Voting - 7
Boxer (D-CA), Conrad (D-ND), Dole (R-NC), Inouye (D-HI)
Rockefeller (D-WV), Salazar (D-CO), Thune (R-SD)
http://www.senate.gov/legislat.....0#position
OOhhh, got The World streaming now, very nice, thanks.
LJ- I tend to read firedoglake while I have the radio on, often find I know about things 3 days earlier than All things Considered and definitely before Morning Edition, but I am lucky in that wbur/Boston does good news, recently had Dem Gov candidates panel and did a special on the Health Care Initiative here.
zennurse - isnt it funny, I tend to come here first to check out breaking news. Someone in the comments always knows. I just discovered streaming audio! I have Air America on the computer and NPR on the radio, fdl at my fingertips. my own little media hq.
KALW in San Francisco is generally good - NPR plus local programming. Including those riveting school board meetings, carried live…
watertiger = funny
OMG darkblack– John is singing your praises in heaven!!!
‘Everybody’s talking about planting, slanting, accessing, suppressing, spinning, ginning…All we are saying…Is give our news piece a chance’
;>)
Desmond Dekker R.I.P. -
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/ent.....018910.stm
hmm….. Specter the only Rethug who voted against Hayden. The rest look like a list of future Presidential candidates. Caught this story on KOS. More NSA expose’. Whistle while you read.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyo.....153050/533
Mr. Dekker, RIP, indeed. ;(
it is indeed impressive that Democratic Preznit-wannabees feel it was important to vote against Hayden… Evan Bayh is such the poll-watcher!
Another shit confirmation today - Brett Kavanaugh!
JUDGE BROWNIE
Posted by John Kerry
May 26th, 2006 @ 1:41 pm
Remember Brownie? This morning Senate Republicans might as well have given him a federal judgeship.
If there’s anything the last five years have proven %u2014 from Iraq to Katrina %u2013 it’s that competence matters.
http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=3127
I can’t help my curiosity on Specters nay vote.
Re: The Apple decision.
I’m a bit torn on that one, as a blog fanatic and an Apple user. I understand the stands of both sides. However, and IANL, Apple may have an appeal on its hands for this part of the judge’s ruling: “the more fundamental judgment, embodied in the state and federal guarantees of expressional freedom, that free and open disclosure of ideas and information serves the public good.”
Uh… That can have a really, really broad interpretation. A company can never have a reasonable expectation of protecting trade secrets? It’s always in the public good to disclose everything?
Having seen recently how heated the placement of political signs can get… maybe one theme for a commercial on taking back our airwaves could be “It’s Your Yard”. The idea being, the rights belong to ALL of us, and it’s up to us to protect our electronic turf from drive-by placcarders, PR vandals, and giant corporations who want to spoil our view and block out our civic sunlight — because they think we won’t notice, or that we’ll be too timid to argue with them.
wrt *ilson46201 said:
it is indeed impressive that Democratic Preznit-wannabees feel it was important to vote against Hayden%u2026 Evan Bayh is such the poll-watcher!
Does this mean that the Dems are finally waking up to the idea that running against illegal warrant-less eavesdropping and all the other NSA/CIA/FBI hijinks is actually a good tactic?
Will wonders never cease :-)
Rove couldn’t be wrong…could he?
I heard in characterized as a vote against the NSA spying thingy, I heard his speech this am on cspan blasting Abu AG and we’ll see what Specter does as opposed to his fiery but dud- like remonstrations. Show us the money, Specter.
OT - Pach, I hope you’re reading this…well done on the previous thread. I’d like to know if Mike Mings ever follows up on your interview. Keep us posted.
I am only gonna correct that last typo– not in but it… my mouse is broken and I am trying to get used to the laptop dumbness. I will not clutter up the threads with further OCD issues that I have. Watch out!
I would take a nickel at this point.
Apple’s attempt to classify blog websites as not deserving first amendment protections was evil. Steve Jobs is awful.
A company can never have a reasonable expectation of protecting trade secrets?
Punish the leakers if you can find them, not the press!
Didn’t Specter say even swearing in Gonzo would be basically ‘moot’ or an exercise in frustration?
I say get Comity and Ashcroft. At least they might be inclined to ‘hint’ or something…
—-
I personally wish Arlen would get that mining guy back. You know, the one who walked out of a hearing on safety that he was testifying about. Last seen with cell phone attached to ear.
Must be like Libby…very, very busy. Too busy to care about some dead miners.
Diane - great work.
Rayne 26 - great post. News is like a part of their licensing fee, not something to make $$ from. Now if we could just get acknowledgments on the “oops, how’d that leak into domestic use” military propaganda pieces too.
I looked at John Kerry’s piece on Kavanaugh linked above and its good, but at the end, disingenuous.
They do have enough Dems in the Senate to filibuster. THey just did not do it. They don’t have enough Democratic GUTS in the Senate to call Frist on his game. If The REpublicans get all their nominations with 51 votes anyway bc we WON’T filibuster, then who cares if it is technically still on the books?
It’s why I don’t think its the end of the world to getting stuck with an “even worse” Republican is the worst thing in the world if it means getting rid of incumbant DINOs so that there is actually a shot at getting someone who is worth having the next time through.
I don’t think anyone really is letting it sink in - someone like Kavanaugh with a lifetime appointment to the most powerful Circuit Court we have. Lovely. If another Justice steps down in the next two years - Bush will probably use the 6 mos on the DCCir to nudge him into the Supreme Court.
Dems didn’t even ATTEMPT a filibuster. What’s that —- Joe Leiberman’s “gang” wouldn’t go for it? Yeah - Joe’s an essential ingredient to disasters.
Does any of our non-TV viewers get the “you’ve grown horns!” stare when you say you don’t watch TV? Man, the ordinary sheeple CANNOT understand that you can live in a city for 7 years and still not be sure which channels belong to which Alphabet Soup combinations, and never mind keeping the network affiliations straight. Or how you don’t have a dang clue what an American Idol or Desperate Housewife is, where to find them or even when. I’ve heard of them, of course, but I really don’t get it, and zone out when people discuss either at work.
They always ask, “But what do you do? How do you know what’s going on?” That last question makes me laugh in their faces. How do I know what’s going on? Why don’t you tell me who Valerie Plame is, what Patrick Fitzgerald is in relation to her, and why Judy Miller went to jail over her? Tell me what Abu Ghraib is. Ask me about Duke Cunningham.
They don’t even have a frickin’ clue what any of this is, and they have the audacity to imply that they must be more informed than I could ever be, because they watch TV and I don’t.
This is really the way Americans think, folks.
Blank K - I say get Comity
Heck, if we had comity we might not need hearings. *g*
Ron, like I said, I understood the bloggers side of the issue. But stop kicking the strawman so that you can take a shot at Apple. My remark was in relation to what the judge said in his ruling, not what Apple needed to do in the general context of the case itself.
tis the problem– they don’t need or want any steenkin’ comity ‘ceptin amongst themselves.
aargh!
For Bay Area people:
I recall hearing that one of the guilty channels was KPIX, channel 5.
For fans of NPR:
While I think most of their shows are good, there are some problems. One serious issue is that their correspondent in Haiti was also on the payroll of one of the US government propaganda organizations. (I don’t recall which one). I think she has since resigned from that organization, but she should have been fired from NPR, and was still working for them last I heard.
For the record, Apple isn’t evil and Steve Jobs isn’t awful, just like Microsoft isn’t evil and Bill Gates isn’t awful. They’re all companies or people that do things sometimes that aren’t so great. That makes them human. Not evil. I don’t think any of them are doing 1/1000 the damage to this country that BushCo is doing.
Mary -
Naturally.
——
spec testimony:
http://www.baseball-almanac.com/humor4.shtml
…”Costello: Now who’s got it?
Abbott: Naturally.
PAUSE
Costello: Look, if I throw the ball to first base, somebody’s gotta get it. Now who has it?
Abbott: Naturally.
Costello: Who?
Abbott: Naturally.
Costello: Naturally?
Abbott: Naturally.
Costello: So I pick up the ball and I throw it to Naturally.
Abbott: No you don’t, you throw the ball to Who.
Costello: Naturally.”
I sure wish I could see one of these shows. Oh, I have no doubt that they exist, and that this article is very, very accurate. I probably HAVE seen one of these shows and just didn’t know it. But I wish one or several could be pointed out to me. Do they wind up on any particular network channel more than others? Any particular time-slot more than others?
Ghostman
NPR is a shadow of what it once was. Tomlinson’s malign influence remains in at least the president of the board and certainly one or more other members of the board: reactionaries all. The news is now so lacking in journalistic rigor (though individual reporters do rise above the rabble) that I often turn it down just to keep my head from exploding. And am I the only one who wants Mee-shelle to just go away?
Diane Farsetta (50) — very glad to see you drop in, Diane, be sure to drop by often.
FDL’rs, there’s an action plan here waiting to coelesce. Everytime you notice one of these VNR’s that fraudulently (yes, I think this is a fraud) represent a corporate or political point of view as news, we should be writing a letter to the FCC and asking for the review of the local broadcaster’s licensure. We also should be organizing a group to buy a de minimus share of stock in these companies, to provide access to a shareholder’s meeting; we can then insert shareholder petitions into shareholder meetings, asking for a change of corporate charter to forbid the corporation to create or use VNR’s as a product since they are a fraudulent practice.
And we should be writing letters to the editor of every newspaper in the region served by the broadcasters in question whenever there is a VNR, to point out the problem and ask other viewers to take action as described here. The folks who read the LTE’s are the same ones most affected by VNR’s; those of us out here in the blogosphere aren’t watching television as much.
new thread fyi
I rarely watch local news but when I do there is often a “healthcast” that comes off like an infomercial. Very canned and surely fake news.
I’m another one of those non-TV watchers, and I have found that (unlike many vices) once you quit, it’s hard to go back to it.
This almost got me into trouble once, waiting in an airport lounge for a flight back to N.O. I joined in a conversation which included an attractive woman whom a few other people seemed to recognize, but I had no idea who she was. Of course, she works for one of the N.O. TV stations, and I said some unflattering things about certain people for whom I sort of work (commissioners of some kind) … fortunately, she held similarly low opinions of these people, and advised me not to voice them quite so loudly … I only found out who she was after I got home and asked my wife who it might have been (she’s lived here longer than I have).
sofistic @ 43, OMG!!!
Here is a link about KPIX:
http://www.prwatch.org/fakenews/vnr18
Here is a link about NPR’s Amelia Shaw:
http://www.haitiaction.net/New....._17_6.html
Blank Kludge (106) — Heh. Thanks! It’s been forever since I saw or heard that A&C classic gag, and my kids had never seen or heard it. We went to the site and read it together; they bust their guts laughing.
Naturally.
Tell Stauber to subscribe to PRNewswire; it’s one of the big press release outfits which often has video clips available.
Mary says: May 26th, 2006 at 5:36 pm
Senator Kerry is not refering to filibustering at the ned of his post. He’s refering to taking back control of the Senate. There’s nothing disingenious about that. You don’t want Dems to have control of the Senate. There was not enough Dems to stage a filibuster. Otherwise I think he would have.
The Media Matters study had an impact. I’m a health journalist for a major market O&O local tv station. Today mgmt sent out a memo requiring us to identify the source of all video we use, whether it comes from a VNR, gov’t agency, stringer, etc.
Media Matters should also look at all celebrity interviews. Almost always when they’re on a talk show (and not selling a book, movie or tv show) and they bring up some condition from which either they or a family member have successfully recovered, they’re under some sort of contract with a drug company.
From my perspective one of the most important thing we can do is buy Dixie Chicks & Neil Young CDS, tickets to Inconvenient Truth & Michael Moore movies, and books by authors writing about what we think is important.
Management in my business cares most about ratings, ticket sales, book sales etc.. Political pressure is secondary.
Re: Bob Edwards - I don’t miss him. I’m sorry for hte way he was ousted - especially as we are just about hte same age.
But I was getting more and more angry listening to his interviews - as bad as any of the network stars in his willingness to accept evasive answers, not follow up, throw softballs to re thugs and gloss over important issues. Oh, and his attitude of “i’m one of the kewl guys, we’re in this together” (and you the listener, are not) was growing by the year.
By the time he was dumped, I had been screaming at the radio when he was on quite a lot.
oops, sorry for the typos. I’m at work - hurrying. Guess we’ll see if I can post from work or not.
Rayne wrote, “FDL’rs, there’s an action plan here waiting to coelesce. Everytime you notice one of these VNR’s that fraudulently (yes, I think this is a fraud) represent a corporate or political point of view as news, we should be writing a letter to the FCC and asking for the review of the local broadcaster’s licensure…. And we should be writing letters to the editor of every newspaper in the region served by the broadcasters in question whenever there is a VNR.”
I’d love to see something happen along these lines. We’ve had a number of discussions at the Center for Media and Democracy about how we might facilitate this sort of thing, but we haven’t quite figured out how to organize it.
There are two discrete things that need to be accomplished:
(1) Tracking VNRs that are sent out by PR firms, and documenting examples of when and how they are used. This ought to be easy, but it isn’t, in large part because the PR firms and TV stations have set things up so it ISN’T easy. Some VNRs are distributed via NetNewswire, as Linkmeister pointed out, but most are not. We have an article about VNRs on SourceWatch that lists some of the major producers and distributors. However, most VNRs are sent to TV stations via satellite or other high-speed digital transmission, often using proprietary technologies such as Pathfire, which are not accessible by the general public. In effect, PR firms and TV broadcasters have have created their own ultrabroadband network, almost like the internet except that the public never gets to see it. They’re able to track what they send back and forth, and PR firms use the data to provide detailed reports for their clients detailing when and where VNRs are broadcast, but that information is also proprietary and does not get shared with the public.
(2) Advocacy, such as letter-writing campaigns, as well as monitoring of news content at the local level to put pressure on stations to behave in a more transparent and ethical fashion. This part of the puzzle would probably be easier to organize, but to do it effectively, we need to come up with a better way of doing part (1) above. It took us 10 months and about $75,000 to produce the Fake News Report that Diane Farsetta and Dan Price wrote, and of course they only caught and tracked a small fraction of the VNR universe. If someone has ideas for an effective way of continuing this work going forward, we’d love to hear them.
The thing that really pisses me off about this whole issue is that John Stauber and I first wrote about VNRs more than a decade ago, in our book, Toxic Sludge Is Good For You: Lies, Damn Lies and the Public Relations Industry. Since then, we have talked about VNRs on numerous occasions when we have been interviewed for newspapers or radio. On more than one occasion I’ve done call-in radio interviews in which TV news producers have actually phoned in and hammered me, claiming that “no TV stations ever use that stuff,” and acting as though I’m nuts to suggest that it ever happens. The comment from Barbara Cochran about VNRs being like the “Loch Ness monster” speaks for itself. We knew VNRs were being used, because PR people discuss them fairly candidly in the PR trade press or at PR industry workshops that we have attended, but when we’ve talked about it publicly, TV news people would act as though we were cranks or conspiracy theorists.
Now, thanks to Diane and Dan, we’ve got actual video that shows how commonly and flagrantly VNRs are passed off as real news. What this proves is that American TV news producers and people like Barbara Cochran have been lying through their teeth, and they’ve been lying for more than a decade. If they’re this dishonest about what goes on inside their own newsrooms, how can anyone expect them to do an honest job of reporting what goes on in the rest of the world?