
I got to Oklahoma today and while my mom and I were in line at the grocery store I got to thumb through the tabloids. On the cover of the Globe:
George and Laura Bush's marriage has collapsed as his approval ratings plummet and a host of mounting personal problems rip the first couple apart and push them to secretly lead separate lives!
GLOBE has learned that while George and Laura still appear as the first couple at various public functions, they hardly speak to one another in private and don't even want to be in the same room together.
"When the cameras aren't on, they have nothing to do with one another," a longtime friend confides to GLOBE. "There's no interaction at all."
"For all practical purposes, they've broken up."
Soon, however, Mom and I were home and per Christy I had a look on the high minded front page of the Newspaper of Record:
The dynamics of a couple's marriage are hard to gauge from the outside, even for a couple as well known as the Clintons. But interviews with some 50 people and a review of their respective activities show that since leaving the White House, Bill and Hillary Clinton have built largely separate lives — partly because of the demands of their distinct career paths and partly as a result of political calculations.
The effect has been to raise Senator Clinton's profile on the public radar while somewhat toning down Mr. Clinton's; he has told friends that his No. 1 priority is not to cause her any trouble. They appear in the public spotlight methodically and carefully: The goal is to position Mrs. Clinton to run for president not as a partner or a proxy, but as her own person.
Many of those interviewed were granted anonymity to discuss a relationship for which the Clintons have long sought a zone of privacy.
I'm actually going to give this one to the GLOBE. Both publications are rolling around in the gutter for the benefit of their circulations, but at least the GLOBE has the guts not to lie prone exclusively before BushCo., unlike the beltway bores who are always looking for new and interesting ways to prostrate themselves.
As many find themselves looking back in nostalgia for the Clinton years, I suppose it's only natural that those who entertained themselves by obsessively inspecting every detail of Clintonian genitalia should return to that sport. Ah good times.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
FROOTZ — an homage to Liberace?
sorry so off topic,EPU’d already so here’a repeat
Good evening FDLers,
just back from the Crashing the Gate Delivery.A wonderful time was had by all.I’m beat.
Around noontime today I noticed the Globe cover story at my neighborhood supermarket (those damn dogs are eating me out of house and home!) and I even posted a too-snarky comment about it. Like I said: out here in the Hoosier Heartland the Globe is sold in more places than the NYTimes . . .
fitz forceps!
“Many of those interviewed were granted anonymity to discuss a relationship for which the Clintons have long sought a zone of privacy.”
What incredibly selfish people, to seek a zone of privacy around their relationship! Mr. Mehlman, Ms. Rice, Mr. Dreier, Mr. Drudge, Mr. Bolten, and Ms. Winfrey have never made such unrealistic demands of the public. Why should the Clintons get special treatment?
I hope the NYT public editor has something earnest to say about this page one (six) slime next Sunday….
I sent my snarky comment here:
To reach Byron Calame, who represents the readers, e-mail public@nytimes.com
So how reliable is the Globe as an indicator of the zeitgeist?
DMM — do tell…
*ilson -
I saw that ’snarky’ post and, being a bit naive maybe, and of course not having seen said cover, I thought you were joking.
How long ago was it that the coverage had George drinking again?
Gee, I’d love to see if these headlines at checkout track w/polling JAR…talk about ‘viral’ marketing.
Who ‘owns’ the Globe?
newstips@globefl.com (for all of you muckrakers out there!)
http://www.globemagazine.com/ (doesn’t have the latest issue)
p.s. I try to read the tabloids whenever I can (in the line at the supermarket, that is)
So I guess we’ll be seeing the Times resurrect the gossip about George W. Bush’s decades long affair with Victor Ashe?
The New Cervix Times looks enviously on the circulation numbers of the World Weekly News, and wishes it could send intrepid reporter, Judith Miller, into the field — to catch the Clenis or Hillary in flagrante dilecto with Bat Boy.
Absent that, they send the Eye Spy Sewer Cam up the drainpipes of the Clinton residence, to see who does what . . .
VG 10, I confess that I sometimes get in the longest line to scan those scandal rags.
somewhat off topic, tho not if you consider the larger implications, but skippy is just sick and tired of it all.
ck == New Cervix Times — I’m using that one at some point. Most excellent.
Old Joke Warning
Why is Laura always on top?
Because George can only f*ck up.
Randi Rhodes has said over and over again that the Traditional Media has “cancelled the news”. Congressman Conyers had a “forum” in the basement of Congress because he was NOT allowed to call a real one about “what is wrong with the media”.
I stopped watching most TV news which makes my kids happy because they don’t have to hear Mom swearing at it endlessly with what a @#$%$#@ liar that TV anchor who is spewing some crap.
Local news reguritating what Faux has been putting out.
I quit watching because there would be story after story in the news segment and the only thing you can say is… “That was news?”
BTW, I had to buy that Globe for that quote.
Inquirer says that Clusterfuck only wants to do Laura in the ass- like he does the rest of america- and she’s had enough of it. Bought an 18 inch dildo and slammed it to him. Now he won’t have anything to do with her. But that’s just a RUMOR!
GLOBE has learned that while George and Laura stll appear as the first couple at various public functions, they hardly speak to one another in private and don’t even want to be in the same room together.
No matter how much the dosage is increased, even XANAX has it’s limits . . .
DMM #2:
You did something (a lot!) very positive. Now please tell me that you bounced my copy off DiFi’s head after she helped vote Hayden out of committee today. We in CA have but one senator - Barbara Boxer.
Jane:
“Many of those interviewed were granted anonymity to discuss a relationship for which the Clintons have long sought a zone of privacy.”
Shouldn’t that passage read, “Many of those interviewed were granted anonymity so that they could knife their friends/patrons/mentors in the back with impunity.”? Talk about vile! I’m not all that big a fan of either Clinton, but this article and the mentality behind it are just sick.
Well it was a long day,more so for those from NY.Pretty well recived,quite a few had heard about it,I think word spread as the day went on.Mostly gave the books to the folks at the front desks,but a few LDs and PR reps did come out to receve them.Politics TV got plenty of good footage.Jim P should be posting a more detailed diary on Kos.Me and Jim met with Sarbanes and Mikulski staffers before we even started with the book delivery,for stateprojectMD,sort of a meet and greet,open the channels of communication type thing.Sent a few pics to Pach,your welcome to them also.
Why would the Clintons want a zone of privacy about how often they screw, who they screw, or in what manner they screw? Must have somethin to hide. Only GUILTY people are afraid of the truth.
Jane, at least you can use it if your dogs are not already house broken?
Or have you gone into birds to line their cages?
Or do people still wrap fish in those things?
Apparently the Clinton’s look for a zone of privacy when they take a shit too- what are they HIDING?
those who entertained themseles
George and Laura stll
Your posts are usually flawless Jane so I hope I’m not being a bore by pointing out a few typos.
As far as George and Laura’s relationship? Can you imagine ANY self-respecting woman wanting to be “close” to W?
Di Fi has a policy of not reciving any gifts at all,I don’t have a problem with that,but that negates wacking her with a copy(just kidding)
The funny part is…..I drew the Leiberman card(pause to laugh hystericaly).His front desk boys looked like they had bitten lemons.Had the hardest time not telling them how much I’ve given to Ned
who wouldn’t chose the inflamatory prose of the Globe to the ‘watching paint dry’ turbidity of the Times or the Post or just about any of the official newspapers of record
guess it was just coincidence that Tweety had a set piece (no pun intended) on the Clintons’ er relationship today.
it’s spring, things are bad, so naturally everyone’s attentions wander back to the good old days and speculations about Bill Clinton’s sex life
Welcome to Oklahoma Jane! Look forward to meeting you in Lost Wages. Got to get offline now. Save me a seat for something or another on the 8th. I’ll be flying back here on the 9th. Bizzy bizzy. Nightall!
This behavior by the Right Wing NY Times pisses me off more than anything else. The GOP is doing what any organized crime syndicate does — it pushes it’s advantage until the guardians of the public interest push back.
But the Right Wing GOP Gangsters struck paydirt, when the co-opted the MSM into becoming the Right Wing Propaganda Organ of the BushCo Criminal Conspiracy. Al Gore got 40,000 more votes in Florida than George Bush — who knew? No a single citizen, thanks to the Right Wing New York Times . . .
Goebbels and Hitler only dreamed of a propaganda machine like the MSM . . .
Next week the New York Times offers and exclusive and inside look into “What did Dick and Lynn Cheney do to make Mary gay?”
-GSD
Mary had one look at Daddy and swore off guys for life.
ya’know
i gotta go with the high road on this and say it really isn’t any of our business
that said, maybe the NYT needs to look for space at the checkout in OK
my personal favorite has always been The Sun (at least until The Onion)
but they want, like $2 now, and it just ain’t that good.
DMM, thanks for trying. If I ever see her, I’ll swat her with a rolled-up copy of the Globe. My friends in SF used to live a few blocks from the Blum compound, but they’ve since moved to a nicer neighborhood.
Jane *is* flawless. It’s the internets that got sloppy.
You were in Kookla and you didn’t call? :-)
Actually, I’d seen the Globe story on the shelves in the checkout aisle but I didn’t make the connections you have. But that’s why I read you. In fairness, this was over the weekend and to my shame, I actually thought it was a good thing the Bushes were being gossiped about. Since then, of course ….
Globe…or Times. Hmm. Like the punchline to the old joke says: “We’ve already established what you are…now we’re just negotiating the price!”
We’re creeping ever closer to the realization that party affiliation isn’t all that Duke Cunningham and Dubya have in common. Hickies in awkward places from JimmyJeff GannonGuckert are not likely to play well in the red states, methinks.
Perhaps the New York Times will do an exclusive as to how Condi Rice, Ken Mehlman and Dave Drier and Lyndsey Graham keep their chastity in accordance with their Christian faith.
They can give tips on how to avoid situations that lead to sin. Tips like icing the private parts, use of salt peter, how they keep handy pictures of Barbara Bush to stanch erotic feelings and such.
Then they can offer how celibacy in the service of the nation is their ultimate sacrifice.
Maybe they can ask Pickles if George W. still hankers to jerk some cow cock.
-GSD
Before I crash for the night,thumbs up to all who paticipated today!We all worked our asses off,many a mile in those buildings,few problems getting boxes of books through security,but it got done,and well!
Came home to find my copy of Greenwald’s new book on the back deck.All right Amazon!
Good night to all.look forward to rolling up the sleeves and working the next project,once we decide what that may be.
If anyone wishes to get involved in Maryland,E-mail me at paradox65 AT comcast DOT net
Again,good night all.
site helper: the email address has been edited so that it is not prey to spambots
“Many of those interviewed were granted anonymity to discuss a relationship for which the Clintons have long sought a zone of privacy.”
OK, this had BETTER be the first tentative step in the direction of the NYT outing every single closeted self-loathing queer in the Republican Party.
Responsible journalism demands that someone start going through Ken Mehlman’s garbage. Make me proud, NY Times!
GSD –
Pickles said Dubya tried to milk a stallion . . .
A stallion named JimmyJeff?
There’s another advantage the Globe has over the NYT, it’s cheaper and has better pictures. Well, I guess that’s two advantages, but when you’re a reader of those two rags, clearly you’re not into counting.
So, Jane, did you get to check out The Weekly World? Haven’t been able to get to the supermarket this week, and I’m behind on my science reading. Where’s the amazing bat child this week? ;-)
That Globe article looks like a recycled article about the Clintons.
The Globe used to be a Canadian paper (from Montreal) before it was acquired by a US tabloid conglomerate, according to Wikipedia. I wonder if it still has any Canadian editorial influence.
My very favorite tabloid is Mira! (exclamation point in the title.
Yeah, it’s all in Spanish, but that’s a bonus. Why? They use such simple language, over and over, that you can pick up the kind of Spanish you don’t learn in school. I’ve learned lots of colloquial Spanish this way. And laid my eyes on some muy delicioso eye candy. If there’s anything I love more than politics, it’s a hot young stud.
Oh, and Mira is really, really good about using their fonts and punctuation to put the spin on a story. Especially when you see the word “embarazado.” Any reader of Mira knows that this means P-R-E-G-N-A-N-T. The type, size and color (and bold/not bold) tells you, right off, if so-and-so being knocked up is a good or bad thing. If you get an exclamation point on it, it’s a really big deal.
Jane, did the Globe that you bought happen to mention what Bat Boy is doing this week? Or is that some other tabloid? Maybe the NYT will cover the story…
Shorter Jane: The only diff between the NYT and Globe is that the NYT uses more multi-syllabic words.
Recall that it was the Examiner or the Enquirer or whatever tabloid that broke the Rush-Eats-Oxycotin-For-Breakfast story.
I find it telling when the rags publish stories like this. There’s sometimes a remnant of truth in the vulgarity and silliness and lies. Just like the corporate media only with more obviously photoshopped pix.
And GSD 39, it was horses, not cows that Laura claimed W hankers to jerk off. Why do I recall that? Because it’s well-known among us intheknow here in Texas that W is terribly frightened of horses. Laura made a “double funny”.
rwcole @ 8:36 pm (#32) - There’s a problem with your theory, which is that her mother would have the same effect on behalf of women.
Gods, fuck this ridiculous culture and all this utter puerile juvenile unbelievable freakin RIDICULOUSNESS.
FITZ TAKE ME AWAY!!
& goodnight all
neurophius @ 8:55 pm (#46) - It’s The Weekly World that covers the bat child and other issues in the field of notional zoology (Nessy, Bigfoot, aliens, etc.). Many of the tabloids used to cover this field, also, but apparently it doesn’t have the cachet it once did.
Sharkbabe @ 8:58 pm (#49) - Amen, and goodnight.
On a hopeful serious note, Kevin Drum reports that Iran really wants to find an accomdation –
http://www.washingtonmonthly.c.....008881.php
AN OPENING FROM IRAN….The letter earlier this month from Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad may have been wacky, but apparently it really was intended as a diplomatic opening: …
So George W. Bush has a “Trigger Finger”….neigh?
-GSD
“Recall that it was the Examiner or the Enquirer or whatever tabloid that broke the Rush-Eats-Oxycotin-For-Breakfast story.”
Wouldn’t “The Decider” make a good name for a tabloid? W could go into the publishing business after he’s kicked out of office. He could decide what he wants the truth to be and then print it.
Wouldn’t “The Decider” make a good name for a tabloid? W could go into the publishing business after he’s kicked out of office. He could decide what he wants the truth to be and then print it.
He’s already doing that, with every Federal Printing Press his cronies can find — since nobody except the kool-aid drinkers still believe him, his on future is in fiction . . .
LJ/Aquaria, that sounds like the Paris Match magazines my brother used to send me when I was a kid. You can learn a lot from photos and words, sort of the soup can method of foreign language learning.
Just wanted to mention before my computer craps out again… The Young Turks are going to interview Ned Lamont on Thursday.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/5/23/234424/388
kos diary on today’s CtG book giveaway on Capitol HIll.
Please recommend this Roots Project group diary.
but why is this even a topic for discussion? I would’a thought that, given a closed bedroom door, drawn curtains, & 2 (or more) consenting adults, whatever followed (in absence of live webcam) was just none of my effin’ business?
While I appreciate snark for its own sake on any topic, how does it come about that FDL’s political debate about important topics (war, justice, corruption, energy, environment) is hijacked / redirected by irrelevant (albeit salacious) matters?
Better by far to ignore tabloid side-tracks, and concentrate on serious issues.
It’s a small point, I know, but I’ll bet more regular people (sheeple) read the Globe than the NYT, so more people are probably reading about dumbya and Laura’s marital woes than Bill and Hill’s.
Well, frankly, I’m not too bent out of shape by the NYT article. To me, it just seemed to document that the Clintons continue to live a life of lies….relationship lies. Since Hillary injects herself into the presidential theater…I think it’s fair game. It goes to the moral fiber in her…just like news stories of some Republican candidate who is wedded to a certain industry go to his moral fiber.
I DO NOT, and would not, ever want to read stories about the Clintons personal sexual activities (if there are any), such as frequency, positions, etc etc…all that sort of thing. But I didn’t take that from the NYT article. To me, the article just seemed to update the reader on what I’d call the ongoing hypocrisy of the Clintons; as played out in their sham marriage.
If hypocrisy exists among any WH officials….report that too! If some WH official touts family values, but there’s evidence of late night orgies or so forth…report it!
Hillary, decades ago, chose to remain in a “non-existent” marriage. That was her conscious decision. And now she wants to be president? Then, I say it’s fair game.
Ghostman
Neuro 54: I think he already does that - decides what he wants the truth to be. And the corporate media dutifully prints it. But to your point, once he’s out of office, he won’t be able to capitalize on the brand as he does now. Surely Rove or Babs or someone has already gobbled up the rights to “The Decider” for W’s legacy - the umbrella brand for the fantasy-based twilight years.
I demand to know every detail of the sexual congress between Victoria Toensing and Joseph DiGenova. Frequency, length, duration, width, volume, viscosity, position, and whether it is strictly legal under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982.
All joking aside, it is outrageous that the NYT would print a story like that one about the Clintons, especially in the news section and even on the front page! As far as I can tell, there is no story there, just innuendo. So they are both extraordinarily busy people, and don’t always have a lot of time to spend together. WTF? Is that news? I would really like to hear someone from their executive editorial staff justify running it. If the marital relations of presidents or presidential candidates are a legitimate subject for a front page story, I would like to hear how George and Laura are doing. It has been widely reported that at one point, Laura forced George to choose between her and drinking. So how is that doing? Could we please have some anonymous interviews with 50 or so of their best friends, closest relatives, present and former staff members and political advisors to provide a basis for wildly speculating whether George has held up his end of the bargain (not drinking), or whether Laura has sold her soul by putting up with his bullshit in exchange for the privilege of continuing to be First Lady (isn’t that what people say Hillary Clinton did?) Maybe Laura wants to run for Senator after George leaves office. How abusive will she let him be in order to maintain a respectable facade and get herself elected? I think there may be a real story there. Isn’t Judy Miller looking for something to do?
Hilde @ 9:20 pm (#62) - Looks like you have a business plan and an ad campaign slogan all worked out there.
As the content of his and her frequent t.v. appearances have shown, we can assume that the DiGenovas have a lot of proclivities that show experience with scat, because most of what I have seen from them is nothing but shit.
-GSD
you should have seen tweety. he was obsessed with that article and it was topic ‘a’ in three different segments where he repeatedly pulled quotes from it to dissect. i swear he laminated a copy of it for those long, lonely nights…
Cujo 65: Standard boilerplate stuff. I just input The Decider, fantasy-based, psychotic, criminal, greedy, self-centered, addict, horse-fearin’ and fake codpiece into the appropriate entry fields and voila! Ready for the ka-ching!
Oy, I just caught of glimpse of Calabeza de Cabeza Gigante (Pumpkinhead in official English) on Larry King. Oy vey. On that note, I must retire for the night.
May tomorrow bring blessings of Fitzmas to us all!
Thirty years ago on family visits to Tulsa I would go over to Oral Roberts Tower of Babel on Sunday evenings and chastise the cotton tails on my bicycle. While waiting for church services to end I would watch the aliens leave church with glazed eyes in horrific pastel clothing. I was eleven yrs. old. They scared me then and I wanted to tell them. Oklahoma is a wonderful place to bottom feed (lurk) if your a little foriegn chess champion. When you get to the top your listening to JJ Cale.
Jane —
Where in Okla does your mother live? Did you used to live there? I went through all of school there and then moved to CA at age 22. I am middle age now.
… Speaking on condition of anonymity, one staffer expressed concern that Bush, if elected, could strive to compensate for feelings of inadequacy by going to war with one of the oil-rich countries in the Middle East. … One longtime friend of Barbara Bush believes the drug and alcohol habit that has plagued Bush for years may resurface if Camp David visits are not strictly limited. … Several friends said Bush has always been perceived by his father as a “weak-headed” and difficult child … Another suggested Jeb would assume the mantle of “despised” Bush son if George W. becomes President. A close friend believes that the opprtunity to play the role of Chief Executive might relieve George W. of the great mental strain he has been put under by his mother. …
Personally, I’m tired of political dynasties and endless repeat performances in politics: Bushes, Clintons, Giuliani? Newt? Gore?…. Let’s chuck ‘em all and get some new blood in Washington. Lord knows we need it.
My mother was born in Hugo, OK. Well before that, my great grandfather married a Choctaw squaw in Oklahoma which makes me 1/16 Native American. In fact, my terrier here in OR was bred in Oklahoma. Yipes. But born and raised in Texas, I’m not a dirt burglar.
So… looks like somebody at The Globe had “Dave” with Kevin Kline come up in their NetFlix queue recently, eh? ;^)
Seriously, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the Bushes’ marriage had hit some rocks, possibly the ones George likes floating in his bourbon, and quite possibly things could be as bad as the Globe article suggests.
But damn… is it really any more relevant (or, more to the point, our business) than the Clintons’ marital problems were? I mean, I know the Republicans took it upon themselves to rub a stained cocktail dress in our collective face and make it our business, but aside from that… well, I always tend to figure that the less organic memory space I’ve got to waste with info like that, the better off I am. Might just be me, though.
Jane, I did like your catch on this one, though, if for the picture it paints of the New York Times and the traditional media in general. And the MSM wonders why they’re getting increasingly agitated at the fact that they’re getting their asses handed to them in the reportage department by folks with blogs. I think the Times little McStory on the state of the Clintons’ marriage may as well be subtitled “Exhibit fucking A”, as far as that goes.
Frequency, length, duration, width, volume, viscosity, position, and whether it is strictly legal under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982.
EW! EW! EW! EW!!
viscosity??!!
Please, Lobstergirl. I want to be your friend, but if you ever use the words “Victoria Toensing” and “viscosity” (eurggghh…) in a sentence together again? It’s off. No soup for you.
OT - RE: Joe Lieberman Campaign Contributions
According to Open Secrets, Sen. Lieberman was the largest campaign donation recipient for the following industries for the 2005-2006 election cycle:
Defense Aerospace
Alternate energy production & services
Retail Sales
Savings & Loans
Venture capital
He was the 2nd largest campaign donation recipient for the following industries:
Pharmaceutical manufacturing
Securities/Invest
He was the 3rd largest campaign donation recipient for the following industries:
Book, newspaper & periodical publishing
Business Services
Foreign Policy
Professional sports, arenas & related equip & svcs
2001-2006 Senate Election Cycle Campaign Contributions by Business Sector for Sen. Lieberman:
Sector/Total
Finance/Insur/RealEst $4,259,921
Lawyers & Lobbyists $2,426,079
Misc Business $1,970,052
Other $1,661,542
Health $1,058,990
Communications/Electronics $700,345
Ideology/Single-Issue $488,736
Construction $360,548
Energy/Nat Resource $204,600
Defense $190,451
Transportation $157,100
Agribusiness $154,428
Labor $139,250
These totals include both PAC and Individual contributions by business sector
Current Committee Assignments:
Armed Services
Environment and Public Works
Governmental Affairs
Small Business
‘You can’t handle the truthy’
;>)
Darkblack (74) That’s spectacular! Thank you for sharing it.
ahh…darkblack.
That lil graphic gives me an excuse to remember that Laura was on Sun/AM Talking Heads a couple weeks back. ABC, but can’t recall who she was talking to. Anyway, the way you’ve got her wasn’t too far off from what I was watching (altho, I must admit, I could only take it for about 30 secs). She’s always come across as sorta the ’school librarian’ prim n proper, all the way back to those halcyon pre-9/11 days.
I can say this with certainty - she is definitely being (perhaps heavily) medicated, or she’s tipping something like absinthe.
She was east of stepford.
Eureka Springs #68: That was powerful strange.
That was quite the ‘Action Day’ in DC. Today (well, yesterday now, except AK/HI) the NetRoots project delivered a copy of Crashing the Gate to all Dem members of congress. Good stuff.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/5/23/234424/388
It occurs to me this is a bit like the ‘Perfect Storm’ -
an audience (us disaffected Dems)
a medium (blog)
the freshly minted ‘primer’ (CtG) by major players in medium
And a ‘target’ audience.
Add passion for a mission, like saving democracy/constitutional government.
I will be making a ‘contact’ to my man just to let him know that I know that he’s got a copy.
Congrats all around! Good work.
darkblack #76: fantastic. I demand, demand, you hear, that FDL use this as an illustration at the top of a future post. I will bug FDL until it does. Plleeeeeaaazzzzze.
And as long as FDL is going tabloid, what I want is an investigation into the Preznential space alien advisors. You know, OK they kind of drop in, but the WH doesn’t have to listen to just any old thingbob that drops in. They have a choice, and don’t you let them tell you otherwise. That’s where most of this shit comes down, you know. The alien advisor. Weekly World News showed a picture of GW’s and it was one of those long skinny snotty looking ones with the big veins in the forehead. I don’t trust those kind. Bill, he had him a kind of cute Yoda looking one. It was from another galaxy and had a more cosmopolitan wide angle view on things.
Sorry, I meant SPACE alien. I didn’t want to scare people thinking the Preznit listened to a Mexican alien, unless it is Fox, whenever the Bush needs to drum a few brown votes. Which is different, unless of course Fox is plotting with the other alien, Gubernator Alien Schwarzensaucer, to not do what is best for all Bushes, in which case Fox is bad too.
Blank Kluge #77: halcyon, that’s like Prozac, right?
darkblack @ 11:46 pm (#75) - Thanks darkblack, that was terrific. Now I’m caught up on science for the week.
wesgpc
Yes, but who can keep track?
I feel conflicted - I’m against censoring the web, but I just successfully got LGF classified as “hate speech” by Smartfilter, the world’s largest provider of filtering software.
Upside: His traffic is going to tumble, along with his ad revenue. And this is a cornerstone of Open Sores Media, now classified as hate speech.
Downside: I feel kind of dirty. Karl Rove dirty.
Best investigative journalism on the planet, IIRC.
So ‘ nine fingers ‘ says to me…’ if Jimmy’s arse is tight you must indict’…DEVELOPING
I don’t know if the wonderful people here at FDL, submit questions to the Washington Post’s “Politics Hour” Live discussion, link Today the guest is Charles Babbington, their Congressional Reporter. I figure folks here may have some more pointed questions then I can think of.
Supermarket tabloids: “Best investigative reporting on the planet,” says K.
From Men in Black.
I’m going to be forwarding this to the WaPo’s online chat today. They need to know the Globe is kicking their ass. Maybe Fred Hiatt will write an editorial? Lil Debbie won’t be happy and neither will Church Lady Brady.
Pach at 58: Thanks for linking to the diary.
Reading about the delivery of CtG gives me hope. I bought one of those copies and I wish I could have been there to deliver it. Thanks to everyone who did the hard work…
On David Letterman last night he did his “Top 10 Reasons…” on the Clinton’s marriage. I have seen many “Top Tens” on Letterman and I would say this one totally bombed with the audience reaction. Anyone else catch that?
Dixie Chicks new album is number 1 at Amazon.
Well, Katie and Norah on the Today show thought the NYT front page story on the “troubled Clinton marriage,” complete with recap and video of Gennifer, Paula and Monica, was worthy of coverage in the first 15 minutes (you know, the “real” news segment). I’m not surprised, just disgusted.
Ah, but they’re The New York Times, and you’re not. Throw any rocks and bottles you like, but their message sails serenely around the world, even here, of all places:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/.....96,00.html
I’m sure Bill Keller will be laughing all the way to the coffee machine this morning, while somewhere Sidney Blumenthal (who contributes to the Guardian) is tearing out his hair in frustration.
But let’s not get too mad — let’s get even, starting with Ned Lamont retiring Joe Lieberman.
Good morning, pups.
My spidey/fitzy sense is tingling — what’s in the air?
Interesting.
Ghostman
Why does Congress only worry about Presidential power when it’s their offices, not the private homes of the citizens who vote them into office?
The outrage over the Bush Administration’s use of search warrants on Capital Hill against Rep. Jefferson is justified. Separation of powers does require taking such steps only as a last step, if other means are exhausted. It might even prohibit them altogether, under the Speech & Debate Clause of the Constitution (although I don’t have time to analyze that deeply).
It is good that even Republicans have finally risen up (such as Speaker Hastert’s complaints yesteday) at such an abuse of Presidential power.
We need to be on the right side of this issue as well, despite the fact that Rep. Jefferson may have done something very bad. As Justice Felix Frankfurter once wrote in a case involving an asserted Communist defendant, “”The history of liberty has largely been the history of observance of procedural safeguards.” McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 347 (1943).
But why do the Republicans consider the Constitution to be threatened only when their own privacy is invaded, but not the privacy of ordinary American citizens?
And why do the Republicans protest about the Executive Branch’s failure to observe procedural norms only when it involves a Congressman — not when it involves other Americans?
Christy, I hope you will jump on this.
Sorry that I failed to close my bold face font with a broken tag. (Head hanging in shame.)
And “Capitol Hill”. Damn!
and should be “taking such measures only as a last step”
Must be the tropical air, or sleepiness.
Sorry.
When I read the NYTimes piece I had a somewhat different perspective, namely that this was something that Hillary and her people wanted. It is a puff piece for her which both promotes her intimate links to Bill (the still uber-popular President and national “sex symbol”), and conveys her potential independence. NYT supports Hillary strongly, and as with her Murdoch fund raiser, she is making use of media across the board. The problem for her is not the media, but her failure to connect with voters of all stripes because she seems so disingenuous.
I certainly hope that this unprecedented FBI raid on Capitol Hill awakens a somnolent GOP Congress to the over-reaching Bush Administration assault on the US Constitution…
Richmond, imo, the NYT’s and the WaPo set the margin on the left for the corporate media. Everyone else lines up to the right. The corporate media isn’t telling us how bad Iraq is. The corporate media isn’t investigating wingnut welfare and its connections to K Street and the selling of America; the abolition of the separation of powers, and on and on and on. It is in this context that this “the nocturnals of HillBill, is so absolutely unnewsworthy. The fact that one of the two surviving relics of corporate journalism published the story, simply makes the NYT’s decision to run this, even worse.
OT, per everyone else, great job dark black.
*NEWS FLASH* 250 COPIES OF CRASHING THE GATE DELIVERED TO CONGRESSIONAL DEMS!!
More at DailyKos; video at PoliticsTV!!
Stay tuned, FireDoggers!!!
The Today Show just did their tabloid Clinton marriage dissection. I sent them an email suggesting they take their national enquirer format all the way & create a weekly ulitmate reality show about the marriages and realtionships of all legislators and political pundits. They could call it “The Personal Lives of Politicos”…Lord knows, they would never run out of material.
Yesterday, I unsubscribed from the email version of Circuits and the Book Review, and wrote public@nytimes.com about my disgust. Then I wrote the webmaster to delete my account entirely because I don’t want them counting me in their marketing.
My participation was a small, small unit to them, but I feel so much better completely divorced from them. I recommend it.
BTW, Jane, whatcha doin’ in OK?
BuzzFlash interview: Eric Boehlert (of the book “Lapdogs-How the Press rolled over for Bush)
Calling the White House press corps lapdogs — and proving it
A Buss Flash Interview
Remember Whitewater? Travelgate? Ken Starr? And everybody’s favorite Clinton quote, “That depends on what the definition of is, is”? The White House Press Corps’ reporting of every conceivable Clinton Administration misstep rose quickly to a fevered pitch, and stayed there for eight years. So what happened after January, 2001, when George W. Bush waltzed into Washington?
snip
Eric Boelhert: Right. Journalism is not a science. It’s incredibly subjective. The problem has been a strong mindset that takes over within the D.C. press corps. The press has been extraordinarily timid with Bush. If you just look back at the same press corps during the Clinton Administration you see that a titanic shift took place on inauguration day in 2001.
During the Clinton years there was this mindset that we can print anything we want – any half-baked allegation – as long as it’s leaked from either a prosecutor or Republicans on the Hill. And two and three months later, when nothing pans out and it turns out to be complete fantasy, A, we don’t write about it again, or B, we pretend it wasn’t fantasy and we just keep writing about it as if it were a fact. That was the mindset during the Clinton era, and the mindset during the Bush era is the complete opposite. The mindset did a complete 180.
Now you have just as unsettling and damaging a mindset as during the Clinton years. It’s a completely different standard that they have set down for the Bush Administration. My book simply details how incredibly timid are the standards they use for Bush, coming off the heels of what was probably an unprecedented aggressive standard that they used for the Democrats in the Clinton White House.
BuzzFlash: Eric, thank you for the wonderful book.
snip
Read the whole interview here: http://www.workingforchange.co.....emID=20855
Good Morning Firepups,
Rayne - thanks so much for the CTG Delivery video - big, big lump in my throat from watching ‘citizens’ in action - Thanks !
The more they memorialize the Clenis, the Worse ol’ Worst Ever looks…
ccmask-
It sounds like we need to get a democratic president so we can get the fourth estate to do its job again.
Either that or we have to stop calling them journalists. After all, when was the last time they reported real news. Maybe today they’ll have some real news to tell…Fitz!
Good to see you Prof! How the semester finished painlessly.
Countdown last night - Keith had Mark Zaid, who is also IIRC representing some whistleblowers and testified b4 the house subcommittee that Kucinich is on. Smart guy (d*mn makes me feel old though) and great interview. That means you won’t be seeing him on ABC, NBC, CBS or any of the Matthews, Russert, O’Reilly etc. shows, so catch him on c-span or KO
immanentize says: “My spidey/fitzy sense is tingling %u2014 what’s in the air?”
May 24th, 2006 at 4:59 am
Can you be more specific, please? Is your intution telling you that something is about to happen?
John (#101). You are right. The NYT’s reporting now is on many issues rightist editorializing. The treatment of Alito was appaling (”he respects fathers”) and was probably the key reason why there was not more opposition to him. Ditto Hayden: they set it up as a Democratic versus Republican contest, leaving out the fact that this goes to the heart of our very democracy. BTW, MoDo’s op ed piece today was a bad indicator, reaching back to the rips she did of both Clinton and Gore, ridiculing them mercilously and leaving aside serious issues. TOday she attacks the attire of both H. Clinton and Gore, and makes the issue of global warming little more than “fashionable” people-speak intended to get votes. She leaves out that this too really is a critical concern. With NYT “liberals” like Maureen Dowd writing about Democratic presidential candidates, the left doesn’t need to worry about the wing nut right and their media dominance.
cbl (106) — very envious here, I can’t get my damnable Windows Media to run the video, and my sound card is on the fritz to boot.
Agh. Now I have to switch to another machine t