
There was a moment on Saturday, as I was headed down the escalator in the Washington Convention Center, when I suddenly felt dizzy and my hands started to sweat. My heart beat fast and hard, like it might bust out of my chest. Pure panic mode. I promise that it was not just the after effects of the fabulous, best-time-in-10-years kind of night I’d enjoyed the evening before at Café Citron, near Dupont Circle (Publishers Group West fellas and T-Honey: YOU ROCK!). No, it was the once-familiar, sinking feeling of being a hack reporter for Variety, charged with finding a quota of stories about inked book deals, snarky publishing gossip, and whatever “new trends” corporate publicists could spin about a 15th-century medium.
Hi, I’m Jennifer Nix and I’m a recovering staff “writer” for the “Showbiz Bible.” Yes, for one year, my corporate overlords tried to make me believe that the Holy Grail of knowledge and the most important question in America was: What show will replace “Seinfeld?” I, however, primarily covered “major” book publishing and its intersection with the Hollywood movie business. That was a long year, peppered with lunches spent crying in the women’s bathroom just off Variety’s “news” room, lamenting the very wrong career turn I’d taken, and plotting my escape.
I took a deep breath and whispered my mantra: “I am not a corporate shill. I am not a corporate shill.” What a delicious moment of relief when the panic passed. This time, I was at Book Expo America as an independent publisher.
Book Expo, however, is primarily a ridiculous display of fawning and ass-kissing, a giant corporate junket courtesy of the massive marketing budgets at the Big Houses. It’s the yearly gathering where corporate newspaper and magazine reporters wander through thousands of booths, like so many rock stars, saying and writing glowing items about their corporate-publisher-siblings’ books. This process is facilitated by perky and usually blond publicists. Independent publishers are meant to pay the pricey admission just to watch, to stand on the sidelines and not get too familiar with the reporters and reviewers, because really, darling…if their books were any good at all, the Big Houses would have inked those deals.
I’d forgotten, too, about the faux self-deprecation that print media reporters exhibit when forced to sit face-to-face with the throngs of small publishers who come to BEA with the hope of being “discovered” by a big media reporter, rather like Lana Turner in a drugstore, to be the token Unknown-Author-Makes-Good story of the year.
For example, I sat in a room of maybe 400 hopefuls at a panel called, “DC Print Media: Meet the Editors.” There on the dais sat the deputy editor of the Washington Post’s Book World, a national editor of The Atlantic, and a book editor from USA Today. The moderator was a perky, blond publicist named Elizabeth Shreve, who earlier had introduced these same unwashed-masses-yearning-to-proffer-new-ideas-to-the-marketplace to a bevy of National Public Radio producers—in particular to “Fresh Air’s” Amy Salit.
“I describe my job this way,” said USA Today man. “I’m like an admissions counselor, who has to learn how to read faster and say, no.”
From The Atlantic’s editor came a gem of a story about how he works at home in LA, and his dog likes to chew on the books sent to him. I think that’s what it was about. I zoned out at one point and then heard him plead: “Please, no hard-to-open packages.” He also talked about how little room they have to discuss books in his magazine, which now comes out ten times a year, no longer monthly. “But if there is a book that people are going to be talking about, then we want to make sure to cover it.” And how does he know beforehand that folks will be talking about a certain book? The perky corporate publicists!
WaPo’s man talked about the system at Book World, of how a very few of the thousands of books sent to him get put on a table and his staffers “try to read at least 50 pages” to determine if they make the cut for a mention.
A paraphrased compendium of advice for publishers not represented by the perky publicists? Don’t send emails and definitely don’t call us. Don’t get cute or fancy with the packaging—that makes us suspicious. Don’t send us press kits. A hand-written note is nice. We need to hear about your book three or four months before it comes out, but definitely don’t email or call us.
I felt my face getting red. This is how the public learns that books exist, by being anointed by one of these print gatekeepers, who, in all fairness, are overworked and besieged, and given smaller and smaller space in which to mention books. But books are still the vehicles that best carry the ideas that can build our society, correct wrongs, explain us to ourselves and others, connect us, bring us joy—and when necessary, piss us off enough to change the status quo. But first, they have to get by one of these big media types who probably long ago stopped feeling any sense of mission or urgency, or the true power of where ideas can take us. To them, books and the publishers behind them, are more like swarms of locusts descending upon them day after day, no end in sight. With this diseased corporate system for disseminating ideas, it’s no wonder our society is slipping into the shitter.
I raised my hand.
“I’m just wondering how much attention you pay to what’s going on online,” I asked. “Say, when a book rises up to number one on Amazon, or when the blogs are buzzing about certain books.”
“We don’t trust Amazon. Anything can rise to the top of that list,” said USA Today man. The other editors’ faces were steeled against giving too much attention to someone they didn’t recognize, even though I am blond these days. I persisted, and not only because rising to the top of Amazon represents ACTUAL SALES rather than the taste of elitist editors.
“Yes, but you complain about how little room you have, yet there’s unlimited room online to talk about books—and people do. Just seems like those discussions should also factor into your decisions about what to cover in print.” Their faces remained smug and closed, eyes already searching out other, perhaps more respectful, raised hands.
“We don’t read blogs, other than maybe for amusement,” WaPo fella said. (Not surprising to FDL readers, I’m sure.) I persisted yet again.
“But, I publish instant political books, and I don’t have the kind of lead time you demand. For instance I found the George Lakoff bestseller, Don’t Think of an Elephant, and ushered it into the world in six weeks while at Chelsea Green, because I met him in late July of 2004 and we were committed to getting that book out before the election.”
The editors’ faces lit up with recognition. This book they knew. I must be “Somebody.” Atlantic guy interrupted and said that was a book he covered because people were talking about it. Yes, sir, but people were talking about it because it sold on Amazon after progressive membership groups and DailyKos talked about it online and drove sales, one by freaking one, until it caught the attention of big media and stores around the country. That book became a bestseller and introduced Lakoff’s ideas into the national debate after being launched online because I had no other choice with an instant book, and no marketing budget. I had to get creative.
After the panel, I followed up with each of these men, telling them how we are witnessing a sea change—an actual trend!—in book publishing, on both the editorial and marketing/distribution sides of the biz. We can identify new voices and talent emerging in the blogosphere—and these folks come with built-in communities to help spread the word about ideas that get them fired up. I told them about the rise of Glenn Greenwald’s How Would a Patriot Act? to number one on Amazon, purely as a result of bloggers mentioning it and urging their readers to support the ideas therein. I said books don’t have to take a year to publish, and they can help drive the national debate as another part of the media landscape, to shed more light on important national stories that mainstream media leave in too much darkness.
“We really don’t cover very many political books,” said USA Today man.
Yes, at a time when a radical administration is declaring the Constitution null and void, corporate media aren’t in the mood to tell the public about the political books that are trying to make sense of this mess.
So, it falls to us my friends. If your fellow citizens are going to hear about important new ideas—progressive and otherwise—that just might move them to action, we have to sustain the online buzz about progressive books, like Crashing the Gate, How Would a Patriot Act?, Lapdogs, All Together Now, Hostile Takeover, and Stop the Next War Now.
Instead of sitting back and listening as the mainstream media decree that progressives and Democrats have no ideas, we need to be creative about launching vehicles for our ideas, and making sure they sell. We all have to work together to tell our base about these new books and voices, and we have to keep the pressure on the mainstream to cover those ideas and voices so that the rest of America can hear about them.
We have to be the media. Write reviews of these books on online retailer sites. Call up your local bookstore and ask if they carry them. Call your local radio station and ask them to book these authors for interviews. Write about these books on your own blog. Tell your friends and family in person and via email. Buy copies for those Republicans and conservatives in your life.
Call up or send emails to WaPo, The Atlantic and USA Today. Tell them and the rest of the national media that there are more important books than those about dogs with which to fill their pages.
It’s time to talk about political books. It’s only our democracy at stake.
Related posts:
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Jill Richardson, Recipe for America: Why Our Food System is Broken and What We Can Do to Fix It
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes William Greider, Come Home America
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Jonathan Tasini, “The Audacity of Greed: Free Markets, Corporate Thieves and the Looting of America”
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Michael Huttner and Jason Salzman, 50 Ways You Can Help Obama Change America
- FDL Book Salon Welcomes Richard McCormack, Editor of Manufacturing a Better Future for America





Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search

Truth to power!
Fitz, Feingold, and FDL . . lead us out of this hellhole!
Fitz!
Fitz! Roots! Colbert!
Good for you, Jennifer. I assume you had something to do with Glen Greenwald’s new one. If so, these mugs should be taking notes from you. Just ‘cos the dinosaurs were big didn’t mean extinction wasn’t imminent.
I got home late last night to see Glenn Greenwalds book sitting on my door stoop and I can’t wait to get home in the next hour to read it. Thanks for your leadership in getting that book to market.
Great job, Jennifer.
Folks, meet the person most responsible for Glenn Greenwald’s How Would Patriot Act?, next to Glenn himself.
1,159 DAYS AND THE KILLING GOES ON AND ON AND…
Fitz, Fiengold, and Lamont..oh my!!
KEEP THE FAITH BUT GET READY FER A STREET FIGHT!!!
So the FDL Book Salon is on the cutting edge! Why am I not surprised?
Dear Jennifer,
Fascinating post. As someone who started out in publishing at Bantam Books, I can empathize with the onslaught of published material—not to mention manuscripts—that those in publishing must deal with on a daily basis. It quickly becomes burdensome even for the most enthusiastic book lover.
That said, I’d just like to take your ideas one step further: the creation of a blog reviewing these books and providing a forum for their dissemination would be a terrific addition to the progressive blogosphere, and I’m sure that if handled correctly it would be well-linked, receive immediate attention, and grow into a real presence on the web.
Too busy to start it myself, but any FDLers out there be my guest.
Thank you Jennifer– you write beautifully!!! You message has been received and welcomed. This is a sad but not suprising state of affairs; we must change it and I, for one, will do my part.
Dayum, you can write.
I got a panic attack just reading your first few graphs.
Thanks for a great post.
WaPo just had an online politcal chat with Meachum sp ???? from Newsweek for his “American Gospel.” I haven’t read the book yet, but I don’t think the chat got a lot of questions. I also don’t think they advertised it very well.
Jennifer, you’re my new personal hero. The candle-filled shrine will be up just as soon as I get all these pesky political books I buy by the pound moved out of the way.
Funny and interesting. A great combination. Hearing of the book editors, I got this image of a prairie 65 million years ago, a group of dinosaurs their eyes fixed on the ground because, of course, nothing important ever comes from the sky. Meanwhile a few small mammals bothered to look up. The rest as they say is paleontology.
Jennifer, this is a great call to action. As you say, it’s no surprise how these guys think but always amazing. Thank you for putting it so well.
—
my favorite part of book expo on cspan2 was AMY SEDARIS!!!
We have to be the media.
This goes perfectly with the prior Heathers post. The last several years, I’ve sometimes fantasized the Democrats would have the intestinal fortitude to refuse to appear on shows like Meet the Press and the Fox network entirely. Why should progressives provide canon fodder?
I heard something interesting on Al Franken’s show this morning, and I’m embarrassed I don’t remember who the guest was who made this point: Television viewers are not the consumers of corporate media; they are the product. Viewers are the product which corporate media delivers to its customers, the advertisers.
Content is bait. Heaven forfend that content cause a viewer to engage in critical thinking!
People wanting intelligent discussion are turning, have turned away from the corporate media. And we “consumers” or “citizens” or whatever we are find the two-way nature of this medium far more satisfying. Heck, it isn’t even two-way but rather multidirectional.
I think the gatekeepers like the ones at the BEA are about to wake up and find the fence has been moved.
Jennifer,
Excellent post. By coincidence (ha!) my copy of Patriot arrived today. So slim, so political-pamphlet like in its topicality and speed to press.
In a way, it’s a relief the MSM isn’t covering this movement very well. Things start to go awry when the powerful and malevolant take notice. I started my working life at a public library and stayed with books and ideas(bookstores, flunky at National Journal ) until I got to NAL as a publisher’s rep and complete disillusionment set in. At that level, it’s not about ideas at all, it’s about money. Only.
So I say we turn our backs on MSM and just do it. We are the town square. The vehicle is here and you’re right, blogs come with built-in communities (Howdy, neighbors). Remember that ancient Clairol commercial? I tell two people and you tell two people and they tell two people…
I’m clearing the decks so I can finally read Glenn’s book. Thanks for making it so.
Funny, we were just discussing in the last thread (thanks to Christy bringing up the subject) about the pathetic trend in the literacy and relevance of newspapers. Looks like the big book publishing houses will be going along with that trend real soon now. I’m glad their’s room for independent publishers like Ms. Nix, or we’d have nothing left to read in a decade or two beyond graphic novels and computer books.
OT: Re: The Jefferson (D-Highest Bidder) office search.
I can’t figure out what all of the uproar in Congress is about. I’m assuming that the FBI had a search warrant. (If not, then I understand the uproar.) They certainly seem to have enough evidence to justify one. Why is it okay for the FBI to spy on my phone calls without a warrant, but not okay to search someone’s office with a warrant?
Thanks for writing this.
It is a sad fact that most of the newspapers and magazines which still cover books are giving them less space.
One thing about BookExpo is it is a gathering of independent bookstores as well.
I’ll admit I’m also skeptical of Amazon rankings. Far too many stories use them as a lazy way to get a statistic. There was a Wall Street Journal article years ago on how a few sales can cause a book’s rank to rise (though obviously it takes a lot of pre-orders for a book to reach the top of the list).
I understand people who don’t have a good independent bookstore shopping online (though they can use http://booksense.com or http://powells.com ). But even in the Bay Area, Cody’s is closing one store and A Clean Well-Lighted Place for Books is for sale and may close.
There are also litbloggers and some of them are political. One does a podcast and did an interview with Norman Solomon when War Made Easy came out
http://www.normansolomon.com/n…..rview.html
strange that the publishing experts don’t understand the new face of publishing. how could you ignore the power of the blogs? well, i think that they do at their peril.
OT– Dodd is considering a run for the WH… acc to CNN just now.
OT: And apologies if this has been discussed and answered elsewhere. James Wolcott’s blog seems to have disappeared. I get nothing but a blank space. Do we know why?
I’m awaiting Glenn’s book from Amazon — and it’s so nice to meet you, Jennifer! Thank you so much for sharing your expo experience with us; this was fun to read and I felt like I was there beside you. Plus I liked the part about being blonde now….
Frank Probst:
Question is, why did Abu Gonzales’ Justice Department hit the Hill office of Jefferson, a Democrat, and not the Hill offices of Cunningham, or any other Republican under investigation?
EPU’d from previous thread:
wait, the SSCI voted 12-3 for Hayden in SECRET?
wtf is up with that?
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITI…..index.html
From the NYT: All eight Republican members of the committee were joined by four Democrats in endorsing General Hayden. Senators Russell D. Feingold of Wisconsin, Evan Bayh of Indiana and Rob Wyden of Oregon voted against his confirmation, citing their concerns about General Hayden’s role in a controversial domestic surveillance program he ran while head of the National Security Agency.
Chalk up another vote for Fernald – DiFi just blew it again. And more cheers for Feingold!
Very interesting. The book world has a certain pinache to us blogger types. The way you describe it reminds me of my “show biz” days, which sometimes got kinda seedy.
Thanks for stopping by Drinking Liberally, and look forward to seeing you at Glenn’s DC booksigning.
A great resource with a large catalogue for independent publishers that deserves to be much better known:
Small Press Distribution
Check out the Featured Cultural Writing & Featured Middle Eastern Studies titles.
Maybe if the print corps sidelines themselves to a huge new vehicle for publicizing books, we’ll see some bright new stars emerge in the industry (not to mention the excellent writing that is emerging).
Thanks for the insightful post, Jennifer.
Sounds like you’re on at least the tenth or eleventh step to recovery…
Thanks, Jennifer – great post. I’m eagerly awaiting my copy of Glenn’s book. As with so many other aspects of the ongoing revolution, it’s up to us – and yes, from a lurker, a progressive book blog is a great idea. If I weren’t already working two jobs, I’d try to start one.
ahem, “sideline themselves”, that is.
Pachacutec says:
May 23rd, 2006 at 1:33 pm
Frank Probst:
Question is, why did Abu Gonzales’ Justice Department hit the Hill office of Jefferson, a Democrat, and not the Hill offices of Cunningham, or any other Republican under investigation?
———————————————————-
That’s also a legitimate–but separate–question.
Man, I’ve been on both sides of this, so I can definitely relate. When I was on the business end (oh, so long ago), I didn’t need 50 pages to tell me if something were worth a damn–I knew in three paragraphs. To this day, I can go to B & N, pick up a book, read those first three grafs–and I know: Flop or Fizzle. With fiction–as a consumer, my soft heart will tell me to give a book a few more pages. In business, I wasn’t so kind. But non-fiction?Sorry, if you didn’t grab me in those three grafs, back on the pile you went. It still holds as a consumer.
The “eye” for good or bad books is an acquired skill. But you can bet I use that skill now that I’m on the writing end. ;)
The best part is that, since I got my on-the-job flop or fizzle training, I can spot obscure books or authors now that will “break out” big later. I was screaming off the rooftops about Neal Stephenson–I think I was one of maybe 10 people who read his first book–and I don’t even read sci-fi, all that often. But I wasn’t finding anything that interested me in my usual areas, I wandered over to sci-fi, picked up his book…and something about his writing grabbed me, right off. I remember when a writer friend came to me with the Ingrams stats on Cryptonomicon, and said, “You were right that he would hit it big. Look at this!”
And folks, I’m just a dumb hick from Texas. If I can learn how to do this, anybody can. So who needs stinkin’ Atlantic or WaPo or NYTBR? They are too stuffy, too beholden to the corporate publicity machine. Most of their reviews aren’t to tell you about the books, anyway, but to tell you how smart the reviewer is. And when they do tell you about the book, it has to fit a rather rigid criteria for what makes a good book…to the review cabal.
Today’s great books are out there. You can find them, right now, without their help. And, like the writer of this post says, you can push those book into the spotlight, thanks to dozens of new avenues that make NYTBR fight a bit harder to be ahead of the literary curve, rather than behind it…like they usually are.
Thanks for the link, Arcturus 29.
Frank Probst @ 1:30 pm (#19) – According to NPR yesterday, they had an 83-page warrant. Why it had to be that long, I’m not sure, but it’s available at the NPR site.
http://www.npr.org/documents/2…..dacted.pdf
[It’s a PDF document, of course.]
Appears that Congress don’t want the FBI snooping around their offices. Like you, I’m a bit confused as to why they would draw the line here, but it’s nothing to do with a lack of a warrant or probable cause.
my son passed on to me a book by an author i had never heard of:
“Partly Cloudy Patriot” by Sarah Vowell
It actually falls under the category of humor but it is humor with a point. She slips in her critque of the current political scene sometimes quite unexpectedly. Vowell’s style is not “in your face” like Hunter S. Thompson and therefore she can reach a whole different, less radical segment of the population. Her most recent book is called “Assassination Vacation”. I don’t know if her books have reached the best seller lists or have been reviewed in USA Today but they deserve to be.
Why am I awaiting moderation? Weird!
I ordered Glenn Greenwald’s How Would a Patriot Act? (on the day it hit Amazon No. 1) for two reasons only: because I read about it on AOL, and because I was familiar with Greenwald and his blog from their frequent mentions on FDL. How does that behavior figure into the conventional publishing world’s scheme of things?
Frank Probst-
Congresscritters are above FBI warrants and searches.
There is a certain decorum afforded the members.
T-
I’ve been trying to find a good objective book on how politics actually works–what’s the process for candidates from dream to victory?- what are the agreed upon ingredients for a successful campaign?, what are some basic decision making trees for candidates to follow in planning a campaign and for making midterm corrections?. Haven’t found anything yet. Any suggestions?
Would prefer something from a seasoned pro who has both DONE it- and perhaps taught about it at a university.
P J Evans @ 1:34 pm (#27) – Evan Bayh voted against Hayden? He must have had his Wheaties and forgotten his tranquilizers today.
OT to Christy: Sorry I jumped the gun on the latest Libby “news”. Jeralyn has pointed out that there’s nothing really new here. I just can’t keep track of the names of all of the people who talked to Libby about Plame before he “first” heard about her from reporters, so I thought it was legit.
Question for Libby’s lawyers: You claim Libby didn’t know about Plame until reporters told him about her, but when Fitz says a CIA briefer told Libby about her before then, you have no trouble coming up with the CIA briefer’s name. How does that work? He can’t remember being told, but he remembers the name of the man that he can’t remember talking with?
Thanks Jennifer for another great post. I jumped to the top thread when I logged in as soon as I saw your name.
I preordered Glenn’s book last week, the bookstore is waiting for their first shipment to arrive any day and I’m definitely looking forward to reading it.
Jennifer, I was impressed with your choice to press these men afterward, engage with them, and educate them a bit. It would have been so easy to just walk away in disgust.
There’s value in standing in there with the industry poobahs. It’s a crashing the gates kind of thing.
BTW – I thought it brave of you to indulge a snark about dog books here at Jane’s venue ;>)
Hey, Jane and Redd,
Let’s hear more from Jennifer. This lady can write! She builds suspense, tells a tale, makes a point, and hooks us right in. Good addition to the FDL front page lineup.
Hey, Jennifer,
You are Isaiah Thomas, Revolutionary War printer, and yours is the new Sedition Foundry.
More details at http://www.dwroth.com/american…..n_Foundry_
Thank you for what you are doing!
Prof (from an island off the coast of Honduras for a few days)
Sarah Vowell is great. When she read a while back at A Clean Well-Lighted Place for Books, I told her I wish become a regular op-ed columnist for the NY Times instead of just a guest when someone goes on vacation. She said it was harder to do than she expected.
You really need to hear her voice. This wikipedia
entry on her has links to the episodes of This American Life where she has pieces
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Vowell
OT: Wow – I’ve been reading through this search warrant (I was interested in what they were looking for). Jefferson’s apparently accepted at least a couple of bribes (should probably say “is alleged to have …”), and is alleged to have been involved in bribing a Nigerian government official.
If this is true, he deserves the crap that’s about to hit him.
mb# 35: my pleasure!
Thanks, Jennifer, for depressing the holy living snot out of me.
Seems like every time I go to the local bookstores, I leave wondering why I bother going back — always the same corporate-approved pablum, never the classics, never the slightly-older-than-brand-new, never any small-press writers or no-longer-popular grand masters.
I know the key is to support independent bookstores (of which there are none in my hometown) or to order online. But it gets so depressing to see the publishers stubbornly refusing to learn anything new. It gets depressing to think of how many writers may be getting their brilliant books tossed aside by publishers who can’t be bothered to think outside the box…
Thanks, Jennifer. I was just having the same conversation with someone — why are these books not being reviewed? We assume the WaPo spends much time with their heads in a very personal dark space, but still.
I guess we’re just going to have to raise some hell over this.
I suppose the system discourages risk taking. If you bet money on a longshot- and you lose- it can’t be good for your career- so a profile of safe bets emerges and most stick within the yellow lines.
Self preservation.
Cujo,
Maybe Congressman Jefferson answered the e-mail spam from Mrs. Sani Abacha?
-GSD
John Casper — it’s absurd that they pick people like Meecham and Ole 60 Grit who write bullshit books nobody wants to read, subsidized by wingnut welfare, to do no-interest online chats at the WaPo.
The insidious kewl kidz aspect of all this is disgusting.
Jane, I love it when you say those magic words “guess we’re just going to have to raise some hell over this”.
Re: Sarah Vowell and her voice.
If you have kids or are a big Rand fan, you’ve probably heard her voice. She is the voice of Violet in “The Incredibles.”
I was aghast at the FBI searching a Congressional office — it has nothing to do with comity or decorum . It is very very dangerous when the Executive Branch starts messing with Members of the Legislative. The Constitution has a very definite clause written into it about members not being subject to arrest for legislative matters. It used to be that Kings would simply arrest Parliaments for getting too uppity. You do NOT want the Preznit to have willy-nilly powers to hassle Congresscritters with legal kerfuffles.
Congress crossed the line with impeaching Clinton about sex — Clinton rightfully called it “A fucking coup d’etat!” You can also do a coup by tieing up Congress with FBI investigations etc. That’s why it’s so important for the Congressional Ethics Cmte to meet and do its own housecleaning to prevent unwarranted Executive intrusion…
Pacha,
Why do wwe know all of these details about Jefferson before he is even indicted? Have we been treated to the juicy Bob Ney details leaked by DOJ? Hardly, it appears that Jefferson is indeed corrupt, but the way the news has broken and the story already narrated is a bit fishy.
Because, we all know that the corruption is exactly equal and fair and balanced.
-GSD
OT: Does anyone know why Wolcott is offline?
We’re all lucky to have you, thanks for the post. I just got home from the post office after picking up my 6 copies of HWAPA and I felt like Santa taking 1 to library, 1 to realtors’ offices, 1 to bank, 1 to local Dem leader’s office and 1 to my sister. Lest we all forget, and thank you for the reminder Jennifer, this effort takes all of us, but oh my the rewards can be sweet. Thanks again!
Jane 54: Let’s swarm the next WaPoO kewl kidz online chat, and make them unhappy they invited the wingnut to play. Or is that what you meant by “raising a little hell over there?”
Questions can be submitted as soon as the WaPoO chat is announced.
Just the very idea that print news media people consider themselves too “above” blogs to read them “except for amusement” is TOTALLY laughable.
In fact, it’s become the other way round for me—I read the blogs to get my news, and re-read the news in the paper just for amusement.
*ilson46201 says:
May 23rd, 2006 at 2:06 pm
I was aghast at the FBI searching a Congressional office — it has nothing to do with comity or decorum . It is very very dangerous when the Executive Branch starts messing with Members of the Legislative. The Constitution has a very definite clause written into it about members not being subject to arrest for legislative matters. It used to be that Kings would simply arrest Parliaments for getting too uppity. You do NOT want the Preznit to have willy-nilly powers to hassle Congresscritters with legal kerfuffles.
Congress crossed the line with impeaching Clinton about sex — Clinton rightfully called it “A fucking coup d’etat!” You can also do a coup by tieing up Congress with FBI investigations etc. That’s why it’s so important for the Congressional Ethics Cmte to meet and do its own housecleaning to prevent unwarranted Executive intrusion…
———————————————————-
Taking a cash bribe isn’t a “legislative matter” in my book. And I don’t see why a Congressional office should be sacrosanct. If you find a dead body and a trail of bloody footprints leading into a Congressional office, I don’t see why you should stop at the door.
Bertrand says Re: Sarah Vowell and her voice.
She’s on This American Life a lot, too. How did I get the notion she’s related to David Sedaris?
GSD @ 2:02 pm (#53) – Based on what I’ve read so far, it wouldn’t surprise me if someone on Jefferson’s staff ghost wrote that letter for her.
We’re now onto some influence-peddling scheme in Ghana. Wonder how many more countries we’ll find Jefferson’s been scamming.
A very inspiring post! Thanks for writing! Keep up the good work! :)
MSNBC.com is running a “poll” asking “Which congressional party has more crooks”
- Republicans
- Democrats
I think there is a pox on both their houses choice too.
Given that this is an important, scientific poll, please join me in voting early, and voting often.
GSD says:
May 23rd, 2006 at 2:07 pm
Pacha,
Why do wwe know all of these details about Jefferson before he is even indicted? Have we been treated to the juicy Bob Ney details leaked by DOJ? Hardly, it appears that Jefferson is indeed corrupt, but the way the news has broken and the story already narrated is a bit fishy.
Because, we all know that the corruption is exactly equal and fair and balanced.
-GSD
———————————————————-
It’s all in the warrant/affidavit, I think. But I’m not clear on why that was unsealed before an indictment was handed down. My guess is that not all prosecutors play it as close to the chest as Fitz does.
Frankly, I’m not willing to cut Jefferson any slack, even if you can convince me that he’s getting more scrutiny than he would if he were a Republican. The FBI has him on videotape accepting a $100,000 cash bribe. They subsequently found $90,000 of this cash in his freezer. Jefferson is claiming there are two sides to the story. If he can’t come up with a plausible explanation–right now–he should resign. And if he won’t, the Democrats should start the ball rolling to get him kicked out of the House.
“”””Truth to power!
Fitz, Feingold, and FDL . . lead us out of this hellhole””””
What exactly is this “truth to power”? There’s a very quick analysis of it, and the engine for the race car (as opposed to adjusting the steering while the car’s front end continues empty, HERE
remember, in politics, policy is not the race car, communication is.
this is what happens when such a poor job has been done recognizing these fundamentals, that far right wing candidates,including a far right wing administration, with a horrendous track record, win repeated elections.
On a related note, instead of griping, or misplaced consolation, this also is the case that needs to be made NOW to every media source in America, repeatedly. America is not well informed on these issues, and it is skewing democracy as s result (pun is intended).
T–#40—“Congresscritters are above FBI warrants and searches.
There is a certain decorum afforded the members.”
I presume you meant, “the REPUBLICAN members”!
Just wrote over @ Glenn’s that Barnes & Noble was ranking HWAPA sales at 868 yesterday, today they’re showing it at 177!!! Congratulations Jennifer
TeddySanFran, it’s tough to do, because the chat host determines what gets published. That’s why Church Lady Brady chose that format for his Ethics chat with Jane.
Just got back from today’s Roots project, which was great fun and went well (once we got past some Capitol Police security difficulties.) I may have more to say later; right now I need to catch up on work because I was officially “working at home” the whole day.
You know you’ve hit the bottom when even Osama bin Laden is trying to distance himself from you: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200…..0bQ–
Here’s my part for this moment: Don’t forget 50 Simple Things You Can Do to Fight the Right! It’s being sold with Glenn’s book over at Amazon.
More OT – They announced the “poll” on CNBC, but I can’t find it on the MSNBC site, so apologies to all.
Frank – I don’t think Jefferson should be cut any slack either – no one keeps money in the freezer (except if you have a bad moth problem, but I digress). But, the fact that his investigation is so public vs. the lack of publicity/interest concerning myriad Republican rep investigations is a fair question, the only answer to which is, of course: politics.
Assuming the “poll” referenced above ever shows up, why ask the question today, with Jefferson in the news? Why not when Cunningham was pleading out, or news of Hookergate was using up electrons?
It shouldn’t be a “political” issue, but it obviously is, and if it is, then it is fair game to question how the investigations are handled not only by the DoJ, but by the CM as well.
Jennifer – Fine post, and thank you for using “sea change” rather than “paradigm shift,” the last refuge of bad writers.
Ditto comment # 66 and also, I notice when a columnists for the USA Today, WaPo, etc — write books, they are auto’d on the paper’s reviews, etc.
Total BS and conflict of interest! Don’t worry the net will wipe these arogant bastards away quicker than you can say, newspaper print? what is that?
LindaR #16:
Thanks for sharing this excellent observation!
To tie it in with Christy’s NYT post, it looks like they’re trying to make the same transition from delivering content to readers to delivering eyeballs to advertisers. In the slightly longer run, debasing the product will be a losing strategy for them, but for now it’s just rank with decay.
Please don’t misunderstand me: I think William Jefferson should be taken down is he is anywhere near as guilty as he appears to be.
I thought that was understood.
Redshift: Looking forward to more info!
fahrender 37, I’ve seen her interviewed on The Daily Show. Very funny and scholarly too.
Just got my copy of Glenn’s book today.
My copy of How Would A Patriot Act arrived today. I borrowed your idea about an American crisis and managed to get a mention of the book in a letter to the editor of my local newspaper by mentioning your name, Jennifer. I haven’t learned how to post a hot link yet, but the URL is:
http://www.theunion.com/articl…..5359916374
As an example, this horrendous WSJ piece, absolutely skewering the left, is a result of poor communication.
The journal should not on the one hand be considered a leading publication (which it is) and on the other be able to engage in such blatant mischaracterization’s, of both the issues, and positions on the issues, as this. But it is.
For two closely related reasons, both having to do with communications.
When all of the media covers issues better, such outrageous manipulation (if its done purposefully by the journal) or misconstruction (to the extent its done by bias or a lack of objective understanding) would not be possible for a responsible journal. thus, in addition to contacting the journal regarding its profound ignorance, communicating with all media will have a direct effect. this is not done enough by democrats (and often not done graciously yet strongly when it is, which is also key) in contrast to the far right wing — which has orchestrated a highly cohesive, organized, public propaganda campaign (which they believe so don’t see as propaganda) against the media, and it has had effect (see this classic example which profoundly altered the outcome of the election of 2004.
The other aspect is even more critical. It goes to the heart of communications themselves. How can democrats and liberals their positiions, and the issues to their detriment, be so profoundly misconsructed? Simple, by not focusing on the heart of communication, constantly, as the republican party, IN STARK CONTRAST, does.
Again, this, along with the links therein, covers it.
But the simple fundamentals actually cover most of the problem. (actualy the problem is recognizing this). Recognize this, and the fundamentals are covered quickly in a simple paragraph here
Why? Because they go to the heart of the matter. Communication. and they go to the heart of effectively communicating a message, correctly, TO THE MAJORITY OF AMERICA, given the conflicting cacophony of voices and misinformation that is constantly being thrust upon the American populace.
Again, blatant mischaracterizations such as by the WSJ should not be tolerated, nor should public misinformation on such seminal issues to our democracy as this. But the effective case has to be made correctly, repeatedly, and to a majority of America (hence why those principles enunciated above are so critical for democratic voices with a platform on T.V or in the news, for example)
Fitz on 80!!!
oops Roots on 92!!!
why are these comments awaiting moderation, meanwhile comments all around are being posted? just asking…you dont have to post this one, I just want to know. thanks
Jennifer:
Thanks for the insight into the corporate publishing industry. It just reinforces my distrust of the MSM. CNN did a story today about how the stories about the effects of global warming are just based on politics, not science. Their evidence: because the New Republic and the Competative Enterprise Institute (a front group for Exxon Mobil) told them so.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/…..n-dioxide/
Talk about corporate shills.
and that comment, the one asking why comments were awaiting moderation, which you didnt have to post, gets posted immediately???
OT…but heads up….Leopold to be interviewed live at 5pm CT which is in 12 minutes. Here is the link. Click on the Ideas Network side, not the classical music side.
http://www.wpr.org/webcasting/live.cfm
There is also call in to the program via an 800 number.
OT: Frank Probst,*ilson46201 – While I share *ilson46201’s concern about the separation of powers, there should be a legal method of dealing with this sort of thing. Here’s a paragraph from the warrant in the section that explains the probable cause:
I had to type this by hand, so any mistakes in spelling are probably mine.
Congressmen can’t be allowed to get away with bribery and using their office for personal benefit by hiding the evidence at the office. If Congress had an operational Ethics committee, they might have gone through that body to obtain permission or the evidence needed. Since that body is a farce, they chose the direct route, and the court agreed.
Tony 81, your link to the “union” article is “hot,” thanks. Maybe what you meant is using the html tags to display the link?
I like the New Yorker and the New York Review of books for the work they have done on exposing the Chimp emperor’s new clothes.
I am deeply troubled and suspicious about the ‘ Atlantic’ after they published rubbish by the well known red fascist Christopher Hitchens.
( ‘ Stalin did not fall from the sky!’ Emma Goldman said to Leon Trotsky )
We need books so long as everything is not yet streamed online yet and we need people to winnow and chaff for us so we live in highly interesting times.
I listen to the radio on my walks to the shop but might prefer to read or read as well as listen. The technology needs are a heads up display and ubiquitous WiFi.
Better Wifi than DiFi for it’s a fine swine that doesn’t know it’s time.
Greennwald’s messages are often exceptionally written, as I assume his book to be. His post yesterday on the potential prosecution of journalists, for example, was brillinat:
It think the issue to which it speaks is far more important to America right now than most other issues combined, and cover it here
another critical issues, which the left is getting absolutely skewered on by some right leaning media sources, is also not being covered well and is the second most important issue facing us. Ironically, it is through the misuse of this issue that the current administration, enabled by a largely far right wing (and democratic do nothing) Congress, is reshaping America
A stopped reading the New Yorker when they started putting umlauts – ¨ – over the first “o” in “cooperate.” I thought their fear that someone might pronounce it “cooper-rate” just a wee bit too precious. But that’s me. I stopped reading the NY Post a long time ago for better reasons, so I got that going for me.
comment #63 Art 1 sec.6 “They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from arrest” etc.
The felony exception probably applies to Jefferson, Hastert, Ney, Doolittle and on and on
Jennifer, I’d like to know what you think of this…My sense of the times we live in now is that political books are becoming increasingly popular, as they did (if memory serves) during Watergate and post-Watergate era.
Heck, I even found something to back that up, but it’s from 2004, don’t know if it still holds.
“…the country is buying, reading and talking about political books at a rate unrivaled since the post-Watergate period.”
http://www.washingtonspectator…..ooks_1.cfm
new thread: “Mistress of her domain”
new thread alert
My copy of Glenn’s book came yesterday!
carter, Jane has the filters set for moderation when there are more than 2 links in a post I believe, it usually doesn’t take long for them to Ok the posts.
Cujo, I’ve noticed on the Preview feature that when copying and pasting you have to either enter another character of text or a line break under it for the pasted text to appear, it will pop right in the preview then. Hope this helps.
Shez @ 3:12 pm (#99) – In this case, the problem was that I had to copy from a PDF file that consisted of images of a bunch of pages. In short, there was no text to cut-n-paste – they just made pictures of all the pages of the warrant. Thanks for the tip, though.
Margot–Back in 2004, yes, political books were selling. But not lately. I had lunch with Markos and Jerome at BEA, and we talked about how tough it is for political books right now. And then I left lunch and went straight to the panel mentioned above, where USA Today man told me they are not covering many political books these days. Makes sense that if the general public (aka non-blog-readers) are not buying as many political books, it’s because MSM are not telling people about them. Because these books are certainly being published. And on the left, we haven’t had anywhere near the kind of coordinated effort and money spent on marketing books, to make sure they sell well, as they enjoy on the right. Those right-wingers line up and buy conservative books in bulk and pay for huge publicity campaigns.
This is something that the blogs are definitely rising to the occasion on, but we still need to see cooperation from our budding infrastructure consisting of indy media and progressive membership groups with big lists…like MoveOn, True Majority, Campaign for America’s Future, Center for American Progress, People for the American Way, etc. We can win on the ideas front, if we all work together.
Sorry if this is OT, because I have not read all the previous comments. I do not know if this is relevant, but I think you hit it with this: “After the panel, I followed up with each of these men”.
I am a man, and it seems that the testosterone still runs pretty much everything these days, much to my dismay. Your several mentions of “men” and “man” stand out. Was it deliberate? Thanks to the website and to you for getting this book to press.
So can anyone recommend some good book review sites? Since the net is free of those lead-time and real-estate constraints that all the Big Shot reviewers mentioned. Is anyone taking advantage of that?
Although the concept still seems like a sound one, I haven’t been very impressed with Working Assets’ charity-linked long distance service in practice, or the way they treat their customers (I am no longer one).
However, I am thrilled to see their recent move into publishing books like How Would A Patriot Act*. I wish them the greatest success for being willing to take a gamble on the industry sea change Jennifer describes and hope to see them richly rewarded by the marketplace.
*My copy arrived today too!
It’s interesting to read this, because I was just trying to decide if it was worthwhile for me to start publishing reviews on my blog.
I guess that’s a yes, then.
Interesting — but it only confirms my suspicions.
The right has think tanks that in turn promote pundits, which in turn write books that get promoted by a bunch of fat, white male editors who work at newspapers owned by the right…
But we’re going to expect this incestuous, navel-gazing and blind clusterf*ck to change their ways — even if the person making the plea is intelligent and blonde?
The answer is to build our own publishing dynasty; we need to create our own think tanks, our own network of promotion-opportunities, our own publishing house(s), for our own thinkers and pundits. We need to funnel the demand away from the system that fails to support us, to a system that does.
Here’s another example of insanity that’s rather related: television media mourns loud and often about the loss of marketshare among white men in the 18-35 age bracket. Where are they? Will they come back if we make this or that show? They seize upon the one thing that captures interest and then they do it to death; all news becomes Faux News-lite, all evening programming becomes Survivor-lite.
In the meantime, an enormous unserved market waits with tears of boredom…the 49 to 52% of the market that cannot abide Faux News waits. And waits.
Until they get frustrated enough that they start their own media, like YouTube and PoliticalTV and podcasts. And they spend not one dime on commercial programming…
RE: 132. As a result of the information discussed in the paragraphs immediately above [much of which is redacted: ed.] the government has exhausted all other reasonable methods to obtain these records in a timely manner short of requesting this search warrant. A member of Congressman Jefferson’s staff has indicated to law enforcement agents that records relevant to the investigation remain in Congressman Jefferson’s Capitol Hill office, which the government has been unable to obtain to date. Left with no other method, the government is proceeding in this fashion.
FWIW, I don’t buy it. If (as they supposedly do) they have him on tape committing the crime, then why are these records so essential ? Are you trying to tell me that in 220+ years of corrupt congressmen, this is the first time that records are only available at Congressional offices ? This is very dangerous ground and, sorry, torturers don’t get the benefit of the doubt.
Thanks so much Jennifer for the independent publisher’s point of view and a quick peak at BEA in DC. I wanted to be there, but the flu hit me hard and I decided not to share it with the crowd.
When aquiring books for the public in my county, we are relying more and more on Amazon as a selection tool. We have always depended on the requests of our patrons (customers), as well. PLEASE, if you don’t see what you want at your public library, ask the librarian. Then, we can justify buying the book you want. As a poor library with limited choices, we often need the amunition when we defend our choices to our funders.
“We have to be the media.”
Absolutely, Jennifer!
“We have to be the media.”
Absolutely, Jennifer!
http://www.bethemedia.org
http://www.bethemedia.com
Here’s Hoping You Get Glenn To LA
Hey, Jennifer! According to the latest from him, we’ve been dropped from the book tour. Something fell through. Any way we can help rectify that???
Hi Paul–We didn’t have a sponsor group sign on, and a Florida gig came up. Possible, if there is interest, to get him to LA at the end of June. Did your review run yet?
Did Ghandi really say, “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”?
You go, Jen!
Mike
While as an independent bookseller I sympathize with your frustration, your quote of the Post’s Book World editor was not correct. He said they “looked at blogs more out of curiousity than (to guide) editorial judgement.” JIT (just in time) inventory practices demanded that wholesalers and publishers adapt to the needs of booksellers more than a decade ago. JIT publishing will require that booksellers and reviews do the same for readers. Large houses have been steadily increasing the number of “drop-in” titles (sold outside of the seasonal catalogs & sales calls).
However, as others have noted, independent booksellers remain a crucial piece of the publishing pie. If you submit title info only to the media and online behemoths (who are more concerned with moving product than sharing ideas), you will cut independents out of the mix and lose a natural ally.
Re: the panel of men, the educational panels depend on who the Amer. Booksellers Assoc. can convince to participate. Per BEA’s announcement, the Post editor was subbing for his boss, Marie Arana.
Jen,
We publish Thursday. I did a whole other thing over at My Left Wing, that Glenn linked to.
What’s needed in the way of a sponsor group?
Thanks for that, Jennifer and Jane. I understand that there is an enormous amount of material to be sifted through, publishing-wise. What I don’t understand, as a reader, is why an enomormously disproportionate amount of affluent white male voices tend to rise to the top. it doesn’t rflct the audience, and it’s economic suicide.
Ah, well, it’s very good that Glenn is getting published–he’s a smart guy and his ideas deserve exposure.
But, as long as Chelsea Green behaves, editorially, exactly like the big houses, seeking the book of the moment and treating the unknown name like a leper, it won’t ever become anything more than it is now.
In the old days, thirty or so years ago, one got a note from even the busiest of editors, saying, “thanks, but, no thanks. It’s not what we are looking for.”
These days, even that small courtesy is too much trouble, for small houses and big alike–including Chelsea Green.
That’s a long-term mistake, I think, especially for small houses trying to become bigger ones.
As for this –
“Call up or send emails to WaPo, The Atlantic and USA Today. Tell them and the rest of the national media that there are more important books than those about dogs with which to fill their pages.
“It’s time to talk about political books. It’s only our democracy at stake.”
– here’s one such effort (with email and other addresses linked):
SEND A NOVEL MESSAGE:
http://antiiraqwarnovel.wordpress.com/
about the Iraq War and this novel — HOMEFRONT — review here:
http://www.counterpunch.org/jacobs05232006.html
Political books are not our democracy at stake. It is the heart of the human soul that is our world at stake. Many people don’t read those books, don’t have computers, don’t have cash to buy books. Do they deserve this “Democracy”?
People are the stake, the goal is people, the need is for people to get off their fucking computers and interact with other people, speak, become concerned about their world and their water and their food and their neighbors. Move about in the 3D world and make changes in their lives, the way they treat others, the way they pay their money into this system to help it do its dirty work, the way they support a crooked system. All the people need to do these things, even the ones who never will pick up a book like the ones you tout. And there are many of them.
Can you get me a t-shirt from the Harlequin booth?
Marie Arana–the Post editor also said the line about amusement, relating to blogs, which got a laugh from the audience. I wrote it down. Cheers.
montag–i’m no longer at chelsea green, but sorry if you didn’t hear back from them. you have to be persistent, though. the small houses are often grossly understaffed, and the big ones are just understaffed. either way, it’s polite to nudge folks.
Paul–In most of the cities on the tour, Drinking Liberally chapters are finding a venue, sending email blasts to their members, and being our organizers on the ground. If we can get some kind of membership group in LA to help out similarly, we could work an LA stop back in.
Clarification: Maria Arana is the editor of Book World and could not attend the panel. Her deputy editor, Jabari Asim, participated in her place. Book World is an anomaly: #1 slot a Latina, #2 an African American.
Bookish–Couldn’t be happier that Book World has a diverse staff, and particularly editorship of Book World. What is still frustrating, though, is that mainstream papers like WaPo and USA Today could be validating the exciting, online discussions and events relating to books–particularly because they seem to have dwindling staff and space to discuss books. But they seem not to want to recognize this sea change, and are resistant to working with blogs. Why be amused by blogs, rather than see the passion, talent and commitment behind most of them? Identifying and working with various blogs. Have the debate, chastise blogs when they are off-base. But don’t ignore them! Blogs represent the people “formerly known as the audience.” Work with us. Recognize and tout the success stories, like blogs taking an instant book to number one for 4 days, which literally was the announcement to stores and the public that the book even existed. There are so many new ways to publish and talk about books. Let’s celebrate that, and not stick to the same old ways! As Bertrand Russell wrote, “The world needs open hearts and open minds, and it is not through rigid systems, whether old or new, that these can be derived.”
Jen-
For me, so much of the blog world is preaching to itself, without the “open hearts and open minds” needed to connect with fellow voters and change minds. As a former organizer, I have to agree with the comment re: leaving the computer & doing something. As a bookseller who has survived the shake-out, I cannot celebrate a book that relies on Amazon for the vast majority of its sales. Re: “which literally was the announcement to stores and the public that the book even existed”–that’s why my first comment requested title info-apparently, you chose to leave independents out of the loop. My store’s original location was on a busy retail block that has been devastated by online competitors who have contributed nothing to the local community or economy.
Although I do not defend the media conglomerates & multinational publishers, I see lots of room for improvement in your model. Seeking validation of your work from these sources appears to be a contradiction. Blogs regularly receive MSM recognition–why the need for validation? Your publishing efforts may be motivated more than most by the social good, but perhaps reviews would improve the bottom line?
Bookish–I met Glenn Greenwald in January. Asked him if he wanted to do a book in mid-February. We signed his contract March 1. He wrote the book from then until about April 15, when editing started and went on until April 26 when book went to printer. I was also launching this book as a first book, from a first time publisher–so all biz end matters had to also be handled as well. There were 3 of us at Working Assets working to make this happen, and a freelance editorial team. With one book, it was nearly impossible to get a distribution deal, and when it looked like we might not, I put the book up for sale on Amazon, because I could do so as an individual.
I also called around to independent bookstores, but no one would list the book. They said I had to go through BookSense, which we eventually could do, after we signed the deal with Publishers Group West in late April.
It took a few weeks to get the book fully into PGW’s system, but as quickly as humanly possible (having to rely on antiquated publishing systems), we got the book listed on Powells, B&N, BooksWeLike, BookSense, etc. Please see our website at http://www.workingassetspublishing.com.
The book has been ordered by stores all around the country, and has begun arriving and selling. In fact, I saw my first copy of How Would a Patriot Act? on a bookstore shelf at Kramer Books in DC, while at Book Expo.
There may be room for improvement in my model, but there’s also plenty of room for improvement in all of book publishing, selling, reviewing and reporting. How would you propose that I could have better gotten the word out on the two instant books I’ve done? In the end, the early online buzz drives more sales and lifts all boats. If I’d been able to drive all early sales to independents online, I’d happily have tried, but no one took me seriously–with Lakoff, or with Glenn’s book–until they saw sales on Amazon.
And I believe that the online community, and particularly blogs, may be a savior for the book industry as a whole, so I’d just like to see them recognized.
Hi, I just wanted to clarify that I said I read blogs all the time, but primarily out of genuine curiosity. I don’t turn to them for editorial judgment–not because I have no respect for their judgments (quite the contrary)–but because I feel an obligation to base my judgments on my own reflections. I didn’t use the word amusement at the panel on which I spoke and would not presume to. I’ve helped bring a number of bloggers to the Post’s book pages, including Davey D, Maud Newton, Jessica Crispin, Mark Anthony Neal (NewBlackMan) and Lester Kenyatta Spence (The Black Slate). The more the merrier, as far as I’m concerned. I enjoyed talking with you afterward, Jennifer, and I do wish we could have had that cup of coffee. I didn’t mean to discourage you and I regret having done so.
all best,
Jabari
Shit, Jennifer, I’m impressed.
Clearly, we need to clone you.
Thanks for this. Many years ago I did some marketing for an independent press. Our owner believed you would get it done if you just played by the rules. If I’d stuck with it, I’d have tried to figure out how to break the rules to break through the embargo on our work. Believe it or not, I think it may be a little easier now with the internet and possibly through direct sales as a larger percentage of the whole.
Will do my bit for Glenn’s buzz — that book is going to move, so far as books can still.
I deeply appreciate your insightful comments and critique. I read your original challenge to progressive authors to utilize the power of publishers like Chelsea Green to publish progressive material. I did not know if your departure from that firm meant there was a problem that you had not foreseen. I spoke very briefly with Markos during his book tour, and he assured me that there was no such problem. The content of your posting made that even more clear, which I was really really happy to hear, because with Lakoff’s book and CTG Chelsea Green remains, for me, the most interesting publisher out there.
Godspeed in your continued career objectives.
I am the publisher of Ig, an independent press based in Brooklyn. We recently published an anthology, Proud To Be Liberal, and just last month published Confessions of a Former Dittohead by Jim Derych, the story of a Rush Limbaugh “dittohead” and his journey to the left. Confessions was originally a diary series on Daily Kos. Markos called Confessions “one of most important political books of the year.” (Hope he is right.)
Having been in the publishing business for close to four years, with national distribution, I understand the “in’s and out’s” of publishing better than I care to. It is a very frustrating and hard business, as there are quite simply too many books published each year, most of which are crap.
However, I agree with Jennifer about the blogosphere being a hidden gem in progressive publishing. Confessions was our first “blog-based” book, but we have already signed up several others that we will release over the next year or so. Our foray into the blog world was as much by necessity as design–as a small press with just two fulltime staff, we cannot afford to pay the big advances that “name” authors require.
I think what is happening is that presses like ourselves and Working Assets and Chelsea Green are mining the turf so to speak, and eventually, when enough of these books sell, the major review sources, who are always five years behind the times, will wake up.
Look around you, just about everything progressive is squeezed out or remarketed to a watered-down version of ideas that are picked up by conservatives and ridiculed on right-wing am radio and on the Fox network.
I believe that over the past 10 years the corporate icons have tangled up into a knot anything the progressives have done or said.
It’s going to take years to untangle. But, hopefully, the process has begun.