<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush&#8217;s Favorite Democrat Comes Out Swinging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:30:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogenlust</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-124816</link>
		<dc:creator>blogenlust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 10:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-124816</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[…] His positions aren’t all that different than Lamont’s, and Lieberman’s positions aren’t that much different than Clinton’s, particularly on those issues provoking the greatest scorn from the progressive community like the war in Iraq and close ties to conservatives. (Hillary may not be George Bush’s favorite Democrat, but she’s Rupert Murdoch’s). […]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] His positions aren’t all that different than Lamont’s, and Lieberman’s positions aren’t that much different than Clinton’s, particularly on those issues provoking the greatest scorn from the progressive community like the war in Iraq and close ties to conservatives. (Hillary may not be George Bush’s favorite Democrat, but she’s Rupert Murdoch’s). […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchel Schapira</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-120149</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchel Schapira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 00:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-120149</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Does anybody remember the Liberman-Cheney debate in which Lieberman commented on Cheney’s obscene fortune earned while at Haliburton. Cheney, said somehting like, “I earned it all without any help from the government.” If Lieberman had said “Dick, if you think that Haliburton doesn’t benefit from the government, you are either an imbecile or a crook. Which is it?” he might have won the election. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh, wait! He did win the election. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Visit the Schapira Blog, &lt;a href=&quot;http://schapira.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What we know so far …&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;… and tell ‘em Big Mitch sent ya!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody remember the Liberman-Cheney debate in which Lieberman commented on Cheney’s obscene fortune earned while at Haliburton. Cheney, said somehting like, “I earned it all without any help from the government.” If Lieberman had said “Dick, if you think that Haliburton doesn’t benefit from the government, you are either an imbecile or a crook. Which is it?” he might have won the election. </p>
<p>Oh, wait! He did win the election. </p>
<p>Visit the Schapira Blog, <a href="http://schapira.blogspot.com"><em>What we know so far …</em></a></p>
<p><i>… and tell ‘em Big Mitch sent ya!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mui</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-118680</link>
		<dc:creator>mui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 00:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-118680</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Michael Cavallo (153). It’s not about chasing “people you don’t completely agree with out of the Democratic party.” Perhaps you have not been following. Lieberman differs significantly from a lot of Democrats.  He casts throwaway votes: ex: Alito confirmation. Or maybe you are blind to the local situation here in CT. Or how Lieberman got a elected in the first place all those years ago.  But I don’t feel I should have to itemize. You can easily do the research on your own.&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, even if you don’t agree, you should not accuse any of the FDlers, especially those from CT, of being “like the Moral Majority.” The conclusions people came to about Lieberman were after some pretty painful realizations. It’s the type of self-deceptive statements that Lieberman makes and you are parroting that initially made us want to give Joe the benefit of the doubt. Trust me, it backfires.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Cavallo (153). It’s not about chasing “people you don’t completely agree with out of the Democratic party.” Perhaps you have not been following. Lieberman differs significantly from a lot of Democrats.  He casts throwaway votes: ex: Alito confirmation. Or maybe you are blind to the local situation here in CT. Or how Lieberman got a elected in the first place all those years ago.  But I don’t feel I should have to itemize. You can easily do the research on your own.<br />
In other words, even if you don’t agree, you should not accuse any of the FDlers, especially those from CT, of being “like the Moral Majority.” The conclusions people came to about Lieberman were after some pretty painful realizations. It’s the type of self-deceptive statements that Lieberman makes and you are parroting that initially made us want to give Joe the benefit of the doubt. Trust me, it backfires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Cavallo</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-117570</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cavallo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 14:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-117570</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That’s right, guys.  Chase people you don’t completely agree with out of the Democratic party — that’s surely the way to take back Congress and the White House from the Republicans!  There’s a huge range of issues in which Lieberman’s votes are the same as Kennedy, Kerry, etc.  But that’s not good enough, right?  You guys remind me of the way the Moral Majority likes to police the Republicans.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s right, guys.  Chase people you don’t completely agree with out of the Democratic party — that’s surely the way to take back Congress and the White House from the Republicans!  There’s a huge range of issues in which Lieberman’s votes are the same as Kennedy, Kerry, etc.  But that’s not good enough, right?  You guys remind me of the way the Moral Majority likes to police the Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPENCER ADAMS</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-116355</link>
		<dc:creator>SPENCER ADAMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 18:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-116355</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s a related link from the WaPo’s Fix blog:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/&quot;&gt;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Conn. Senate: Lieberman’s Primary Fight Getting More Interesting&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Heading into last weekend’s Democratic Party convention in Connecticut, there was little doubt among political insiders that wealthy businessman Ned Lamont would qualify for the Aug. 8 primary ballot to take on Sen. Joe Lieberman (D). But the challenger’s strong showing shocked many within the political establishment.&lt;br /&gt;
Ned Lamont&lt;br /&gt;
Can businessman Ned Lamont tap into an anti-incumbent mood to oust his party’s 2000 vice presidential nominee from the Senate? (AP)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lamont received 33 percent of the vote from the gathered delegates, far more than the 15 percent he needed to qualify for the August primary ballot. Lieberman took well more than the 50 percent required to win the formal endorsement of the party, but his victory was overshadowed by Lamont’s performance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Liz Dupont-Diehl, a spokeswoman for Lamont, said her candidate’s showing was better than the campaign initially expected. “There was a lot of positive emotion and momentum and a lot of people were really able to vote their conscience,” she said. “A lot of undecideds went our way.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lieberman’s side — not surprisingly — played down the convention results, choosing to focus on the fact that the incumbent won the party’s formal nod. Campaign manager Sean Smith said Lieberman emerged from the convention with the “confidence of an overwhelming victory” despite the fact that convention-goers were “angrier and more active than your typical primary voter.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Spin aside, however, Lamont’s showing is a stunning symbol of the widespread discontent in the state toward the war in Iraq and Lieberman’s support for the conflict. While Dupont-Diehl insisted that Lamont is far from a one-issue candidate, there is little doubt that the galvanizing factor in his campaign is his opposition to the war.&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Lieberman&lt;br /&gt;
My how times have changed since 2000… . Many Democrats in Connecticut aren’t happy with Sen. Lieberman’s record on the Iraq war. (Melina Mara — The Washington Post)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lieberman is aware of his weakness on the issue and has already begun running campaign ads in which he acknowledges that many within the party disagree with him about Iraq but that on the broader issues like health care and education they are in agreement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Though Lamont made a considerable splash over the weekend, his prospects of ousting Lieberman on Aug. 8 should not be overestimated. Polling shows the difficulty of Lamont’s task. The most recent independent survey — conducted by Quinnipiac University — showed Lieberman with a 65 percent to 19 percent lead over Lamont.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Smith said many delegates at the convention saw the endorsement question as a “free vote” to “register displeasure with Lieberman without it costing them anything,” and with that demon exorcised they will return to the senator’s fold in August.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lieberman’s wide lead in polling is sure to shrink as more Democrats in the state get to know Lamont, but it does encapsulate the challenge inherent in defeating an entrenched incumbent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How can Lamont make inroads? First, by staying within financial shouting distance of Lieberman. At the end of March, the incumbent had $4.3 million in the bank compared to Lamont’s $371,000. Lamont has cut himself $1 million worth of checks in recent days but must raise or contribute several times that much to wage a viable challenge to Lieberman. Lamont doesn’t need to be at parity with Lieberman in spending but can’t afford (ahem) to be outspent at anything like a two-to-one clip.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Second, Lamont must keep voters’ minds focused on the Iraq war while simultaneously broadening the scope of his campaign to other pocketbook issues that could appeal to voters looking for a change. Dupont Diehl provided a preview of that message Monday: “People are very upset about health care, people are very upset about education, people are upset at the attention Iraq is taking away from other issues,” she said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lamont’s convention showing proves that Lieberman is in for a real fight for the Democratic nomination. Lamont remains a decided underdog but has in relatively short order coalesced the anti-Lieberman vote in the state. This should be one of the most entertaining primaries in the country. Regardless of the results, Democrats should be able to hold the seat. Former Derby Mayor Alan Schlesinger won the Republican nod at his party’s state convention.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s a related link from the WaPo’s Fix blog:<br />
<a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/">http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/</a></p>
<p>Conn. Senate: Lieberman’s Primary Fight Getting More Interesting</p>
<p>Heading into last weekend’s Democratic Party convention in Connecticut, there was little doubt among political insiders that wealthy businessman Ned Lamont would qualify for the Aug. 8 primary ballot to take on Sen. Joe Lieberman (D). But the challenger’s strong showing shocked many within the political establishment.<br />
Ned Lamont<br />
Can businessman Ned Lamont tap into an anti-incumbent mood to oust his party’s 2000 vice presidential nominee from the Senate? (AP)</p>
<p>Lamont received 33 percent of the vote from the gathered delegates, far more than the 15 percent he needed to qualify for the August primary ballot. Lieberman took well more than the 50 percent required to win the formal endorsement of the party, but his victory was overshadowed by Lamont’s performance.</p>
<p>Liz Dupont-Diehl, a spokeswoman for Lamont, said her candidate’s showing was better than the campaign initially expected. “There was a lot of positive emotion and momentum and a lot of people were really able to vote their conscience,” she said. “A lot of undecideds went our way.”</p>
<p>Lieberman’s side — not surprisingly — played down the convention results, choosing to focus on the fact that the incumbent won the party’s formal nod. Campaign manager Sean Smith said Lieberman emerged from the convention with the “confidence of an overwhelming victory” despite the fact that convention-goers were “angrier and more active than your typical primary voter.”</p>
<p>Spin aside, however, Lamont’s showing is a stunning symbol of the widespread discontent in the state toward the war in Iraq and Lieberman’s support for the conflict. While Dupont-Diehl insisted that Lamont is far from a one-issue candidate, there is little doubt that the galvanizing factor in his campaign is his opposition to the war.<br />
Joe Lieberman<br />
My how times have changed since 2000… . Many Democrats in Connecticut aren’t happy with Sen. Lieberman’s record on the Iraq war. (Melina Mara — The Washington Post)</p>
<p>Lieberman is aware of his weakness on the issue and has already begun running campaign ads in which he acknowledges that many within the party disagree with him about Iraq but that on the broader issues like health care and education they are in agreement.</p>
<p>Though Lamont made a considerable splash over the weekend, his prospects of ousting Lieberman on Aug. 8 should not be overestimated. Polling shows the difficulty of Lamont’s task. The most recent independent survey — conducted by Quinnipiac University — showed Lieberman with a 65 percent to 19 percent lead over Lamont.</p>
<p>Smith said many delegates at the convention saw the endorsement question as a “free vote” to “register displeasure with Lieberman without it costing them anything,” and with that demon exorcised they will return to the senator’s fold in August.</p>
<p>Lieberman’s wide lead in polling is sure to shrink as more Democrats in the state get to know Lamont, but it does encapsulate the challenge inherent in defeating an entrenched incumbent.</p>
<p>How can Lamont make inroads? First, by staying within financial shouting distance of Lieberman. At the end of March, the incumbent had $4.3 million in the bank compared to Lamont’s $371,000. Lamont has cut himself $1 million worth of checks in recent days but must raise or contribute several times that much to wage a viable challenge to Lieberman. Lamont doesn’t need to be at parity with Lieberman in spending but can’t afford (ahem) to be outspent at anything like a two-to-one clip.</p>
<p>Second, Lamont must keep voters’ minds focused on the Iraq war while simultaneously broadening the scope of his campaign to other pocketbook issues that could appeal to voters looking for a change. Dupont Diehl provided a preview of that message Monday: “People are very upset about health care, people are very upset about education, people are upset at the attention Iraq is taking away from other issues,” she said.</p>
<p>Lamont’s convention showing proves that Lieberman is in for a real fight for the Democratic nomination. Lamont remains a decided underdog but has in relatively short order coalesced the anti-Lieberman vote in the state. This should be one of the most entertaining primaries in the country. Regardless of the results, Democrats should be able to hold the seat. Former Derby Mayor Alan Schlesinger won the Republican nod at his party’s state convention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheFool</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-116296</link>
		<dc:creator>TheFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 16:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-116296</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Real funny guys.  I come looking for FDL and I find they’ve been hacked by cumswappers.com&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real funny guys.  I come looking for FDL and I find they’ve been hacked by cumswappers.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plisko</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-116282</link>
		<dc:creator>Plisko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 16:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-116282</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The “Bush Kiss” needs to be in every political poster and commercial running against Leiberman with the slogan:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Joe Lieberman, Bush’s rubber stamp”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The “Bush Kiss” needs to be in every political poster and commercial running against Leiberman with the slogan:</p>
<p>“Joe Lieberman, Bush’s rubber stamp”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimB</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-116171</link>
		<dc:creator>JimB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 15:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-116171</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;While Cheney was CEO at Halliburton, he was asked how he had managed to bring the corp back into the black.&lt;br /&gt;
His reply was, “Arther/Anderson is doing some new kind of book work for us”.&lt;br /&gt;
You all remember Arther Anderson being convicted of several felonies, being shut down and thousands of employees losing their jobs?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mob is in the WH !&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Cheney was CEO at Halliburton, he was asked how he had managed to bring the corp back into the black.<br />
His reply was, “Arther/Anderson is doing some new kind of book work for us”.<br />
You all remember Arther Anderson being convicted of several felonies, being shut down and thousands of employees losing their jobs?</p>
<p>The mob is in the WH !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-116078</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-116078</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I swear I see Bush’s tongue in that picture.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I swear I see Bush’s tongue in that picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mui</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-116054</link>
		<dc:creator>mui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 11:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/23/bushs-favorite-democrat-comes-out-swinging/#comment-116054</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;BTW. Saw about five minutes of Hannity for the sheer ghoulish pleasure of it. I was wondering why Lieberman%u2019s lover dissects the statements of alleged rape victims and football players, while there are so many people dying on the ground in Iraq.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW. Saw about five minutes of Hannity for the sheer ghoulish pleasure of it. I was wondering why Lieberman%u2019s lover dissects the statements of alleged rape victims and football players, while there are so many people dying on the ground in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.261 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 12:33:02 -->

