As you may have heard, Joe Lieberman now has a challenger for the Democratic nomination for his old and current Senate seat in Connecticut. Ned Lamont received about 33% of the votes in what I would describe as a moonbat insurrection.
Tom Watson …

Do you think states rights as an issue would attract voters? This is part of a rant I wrote yesterday.

Currently, marriages are part of the states rights, reserved to each state, to determine. This is, therefore another unprecedented assault on the rights of a state to determine and enforce its own laws. The Terri Schiavo case attempted to transfer end of life decisions from the realm of the family, to congress. The medical marijuana law passed by several states, is decreed by this congress to be illegal. The right to end ones own life, under carefully considered circumstances, has been attacked by this congress. The rights of medical doctors to prescribe adequate pain medication to their patients is infringed upon.

Originally, I thought, the republicans raising the marriage amendment was just a way of generating controversy to drown out any real reporting. Then I remembered that some states have community property laws and some don’t. Would a constitutional amendment give the U.S. congress the right to override the states and impose a single nationwide law? And determine
grounds for divorce, etc.?

Not that I would ever do anything that gauche. But I certainly think it about him. Funny, I usually can’t abide Pisces men!

Now if only I didn’t have to pay to read him……….

If by war ‘heroes’ they’re referring to the President and his stunt on that aircraft carrier, I will continue to sneer. But the one thing I see nothing of (or would tolerate) is people on the ‘left’ saying anything negative about the troops. If anything, it’s the lefties who have shown greater concern for our troops and their safety.

Err…I’ve already done this, since the Alito cave-in. I removed myself from the donors to: NARAL, Emily’s List, the DSCC, and the DCCC (I know, the DCCC is not the same as the DSCC but the company “men” are the same regardless of house OR sex). I ONLY give to proper candidates (Hackett, Lamont, etc) and withhold money from EVERYONE else. I have made it a point to inform any Democratic political fundraisor who calls me that I do NOT give money to the party anymore and why…and that they are to never again call me, I’ll call them when they earn such respect.

Am I alone here? Has everyone else sold out their values and the common true good for perceived political expedience? Is everyone else simply holding their nose in the hopes of winning with company men and thinking that you will be able to “correct” the bastards to the correct path post-election? IT WONT WORK! The INSTANT a senator (in particularly, given their long terms) gets re-elected, they will dump you like a bag of shit. They will feel free to do what they’ve always done because it yet again got them elected.

Tell me I’m not alone in this.