
I'm proud to announce that Murray Waas has been added to the Yearly Kos panel on the CIA leak investigation that will be held in Las Vegas on Friday, June 9. I'll be moderating the panel that already includes Ambassador Joe Wilson, Emptywheel of The Next Hurrah, Larry Johnson, Dan Froomkin of the washingtonposst.com and our own Christy Hardin-Smith.
As a journalist for the National Journal and blogger at his blog Whatever, Already!, Murray Waas has owned the Plame story from the start. As emptywheel has written before, he is the "gold standard" by which all other journalists covering the story are judged. Typically Murray will make some bold new revelation about the story (see Exhibit A), then someone like Michael Isikoff will go crawling to some administration-friendly attorney to print the official spin (see Exhibit B). When they see what does and doesn't fly, they'll turn up on Jim VandeHei's doorstep putting bandaids on the initial spin (see Exhibit C), but without Murray's original reporting -- which does not depend on White House spinners for information -- damn little of this story would have made its way into the public eye.
Murray will also be joining us at our Firedoglake Plame Breakfast on Saturday, June 10.
I'll let NYU Journalism Professor Jay Rosen speak to Murray's importance to this story, from an article entitled Is Murray Waas is Our Woodward Now?
By Woodward Now I mean the reporter who is actually doing what Woodward has a reputation for doing: finding, tracking, breaking into reportable parts—and then publishing—the biggest story in town. He’s also putting those parts together for us.
[]
Dan Froomkin reads all the coverage (it’s his job) and wrote this on March 31:
Slowly but surely, investigative reporter Murray Waas has been putting together a compelling narrative about how President Bush and his top aides contrived their bogus case for war in Iraq; how they succeeded in keeping charges of deception from becoming a major issue in the 2004 election; and how they continue to keep most of the press off the trail to this day.Key point: The biggest story in town is partly a story about the ways of the Washington press. On March 31 Waas emerged from his workshop and added a critical piece (“Insulating Bush”) to which other big pieces attach:
Karl Rove, President Bush’s chief political adviser, cautioned other White House aides in the summer of 2003 that Bush’s 2004 re-election prospects would be severely damaged if it was publicly disclosed that he had been personally warned that a key rationale for going to war had been challenged within the administration.This story said that “Bush had been specifically advised that claims he later made in his 2003 State of the Union address — that Iraq was procuring high-strength aluminum tubes to build a nuclear weapon — might not be true.” But then he went ahead anyway.
Froomkin says the rest of the Washington press corps should wake up to what Waas is uncovering. “Waas’s fellow reporters at major news operations should either acknowledge and try to follow up his stories — or debunk them. It’s not okay to just leave them hanging out there. They’re too important.”
Ann Marie Squeo has a rather embarassing piece in the Opinion Journal full of the usual canards regarding bloggers and online journalists and their "one-sided analysis" of stories. Before she steps out and makes a public display of such ignorance again, she might want to familiarize herself with Murray's work on the Plame case:
- February 12, 2004 -- Plame Gate: Did Robert Novak willfully disregard warnings that his column would endanger Valerie Plame? Our sources say "yes." (From The American Prospect Online)
- March 8, 2004 -- Plugging Leaks: More details emerge on the Plame investigation, as Karl Rove's testimony is revealed for the first time. (From The American Prospect Online)
- July 8 2004 -- Ashcroft's Interest The attorney general received numerous briefings last year on the Plame case: "Whatever the FBI knew, [he] was able to know within days if he wanted to." (From The American Prospect Online)
- July 16 2004 -- Curveballs to Congress: The Senate Intelligence Committee has spoken on the intelligence that led us to war. If only we had known ... (From The American Prospect Online)
- April 6, 2005 -- Exclusive: Plame Game Over? The special prosecutor says his investigation was “for all practical purposes complete” six months ago. (From The American Prospect Online)
- April 22 2005 -- Plame Game Redux: The grand jury finds evidence of an aggressive administration campaign to discredit Joe Wilson. But charging someone with a crime has proven to be far more difficult. (From The American Prospect Online)
- July 15, 2005 -- Front-Page Fronts: The Times and the Post are publicizing Rove's version of events. But is his story true? (From The American Prospect Online)
- July 19 2005 -- An Unlikely Story: Karl Rove's alibi would be easier to believe if he hadn't hidden it from FBI investigators in 2003. (From The American Prospect Online)
- August 8, 2005 -- House Democrats ask that Libby grant Judith Miller a specific waiver to testify (from Waas' blog Whatever, Already!)
- August 13, 2005 -- What Now, Karl? Rove and Ashcroft face new allegations in the Valerie Plame affair (revealed how James Comey had pressured Ashcroft to recuse himself from the Plame case) (From the Village Voice)
- August 6, 2005 -- The Meeting: Scooter Libby and Judy Miller met on July 8, 2003, two days after Joe Wilson published his column. And Patrick Fitzgerald is very interested. (From The American Prospect Online)
- October 18, 2005 -- CIA Leak Prosecutor Focuses On Libby (From The National Journal Online)
- October 20, 2005 -- Secret Service Records Prompted Key Miller Testimony (From The National Journal Online)
- November 12, 2005 -- Libby Testimony is Key to Rove Inquiry (From The National Journal Online)
- March 30, 2006 -- Insulating Bush: How the plan to discredit Joe Wilson was part of a strategy to delay information that the Niger Uranium claims were bogus until after the 2004 election (From The National Journal Online)
- April 6, 2006 -- Libby Says Bush Authorized Leaks (From The National Journal Online)
- April 14, 2006 -- Cheney Authorized Leak of CIA Report, Libby Says (From The National Journal Online)
Murray's August 6, 2005 story which revealed that Judy Miller had never asked Lewis Libby for a waiver was cited in Patrick Fitzgerald's September 12, 2005 letter to Joseph Tate, and it was this reporting that finally helped Fitz break the log jam and caused Judy Miller to testify. When she got out of jail she called Murray to thank him for his work. Because of Murray we know what we know about Karl Rove's various testimonies before the grand jury, the fact that Robert Novak cooperated with Fitzgerald early on, and that Dick Cheney instructed Scooter Libby to leak classified information for political gain.
I challenge Ms. Squeo to go back and find one piece of reporting on this story done by the Journal in any of its mouldering forms that can touch the hem of anything Murray has done.
Peter Daou, Tim Greive and Dan Froomkin have all provided valuable and appropriate context for much of the online reporting being done in this case -- would Ms. Squeo like to provide the same on the reporting of the Opinion Journal's newest addition, Judith Miller? What incredible ironiy that Squeo's piece about bloggers getting things wrong appears on the same day the Queen of All Iraq makes her debut on those same pages. I searched Squeo's piece for any acknowledgement of the woman who brought you "Curveball," WMDs and mobile weapons labs, but alas, could find none. The traditional media smugness her piece exhibits is entirely misplaced. In the future Squeo might want to fact check a bit more closely before engaging in broad generalizations and breathless hyperbole. It's rather unbecoming.
The rest of you are cordially invited to join me, Murray Waas and the rest of the Plame panel at the FDL breakfast we'll be having on Saturday, June 10 in Las Vegas, for which you can register here.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Fitz it to me!
FITZ!
Did I make it! lol
WTG FDL for nabbing Waas!
Fitzgerald Hammer of Justice!
“quite refreshing’.
fitzy-galore
LOL I tried. :o)
Colbert!
That’s great news. Will the panel discussion be made available in some fashion, like a video or a podcast or a transcript?
What a lineup! Jiminy– Waas too? The wingnuts must be so jealous– they got nothin’, NOTHIN’ I tell you!
Jane - wow - what a great panel! Any chance of filming it for a webcast?
I’d be eager to purchase a video or DVD or download of the proceedings … just no way I’m gonna be able to get to Lost Wages.
Will there be a limit as to how many people can attend the Plame panel?
fahrender: AAR are sponsoring and broadcasting from the event. They are providing free broadband for us all for the whole time too.
From previous thread.
OT–wolfie just said to cheney spawn ‘your dad shot a man in the face’
LOLOLOLOL!
We are a little concerned seeing as how Snow got in trouble today and someone leaked Plame went back in time to Vanity Fair. Murray we may have no time fer ya.
Wow. I wish I could come, I really do. Will there be transcripts? Live blogging?
Wowie - can anyone say “dream panel”? I sure can. I’m going to have such a major pity party while this is going on. *g*
Of all the bleedin luck
An OT thought experiment:
There was a lot of conspiracy talk on a previous thread about the video of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon. The following is a ballpark estimate since the precise parameters are not known.
The 767 has been described as flying at between 350 and 500 mph. That is 513 to 733 feet per sec.
The distance from the right edge to the Pentagon wall is about 150 feet.
A 767 is 159.2 feet long.
Many security cameras run at about 15 frames per second or 1 frame per .067 sec.
Given the speeds above, it would take .29 to .20 seconds to cross a 150 ft. stretch. This would equate from 3 to slightly over 4 (i.e. 5 ) frames on the security camera. This is I believe what has been talked about.
You might argue that the plane would be pictured for about twice this time (the space and the plane length both being about 150 feet). In this way, the front of the plane would arrive in the frame about .29 to .20 seconds before the tail but this would ignore the likelihood that some part of the nose entered the space in question between frames and that the tail of the plane never made it to the wall in one piece. This would bring you back to 5 or 6 frames rather than 6 to 8.
The near invisible blur comes from the fact that 30 to 50 feet of plane are moving through each point which contains some part of the plane “imageâ€. The effect is similar to old time photos where exposure times were so long that someone walking becomes a blur and only stationary objects look clear. Here the frame time is faster but the plane is moving much faster.
Hope this helps.
MSNBC’s ticker said something about Fitzgerald being at the courthouse today. I don’t know what it exactly said as I caught the tail end of it. Did anyone else see it?
I think Daily Kos is going to have some sort of live feed online but I’m not positive so don’t quote me.
And what, pray tell, does one serve at a “Plame Breakfast”?
Surely not Eggs Benedict, but perhaps Pun-anas Foster.
i heard wolf say the leak grand jury met today, but that could be interpreted any way you want. no details. ;(
Truthout has a new confirmation of Leopolds story
We have been contacted by at least three reporters from mainstream media - network level organizations - who shared with us off-the-record confirmation and moral support. When we asked why they were not going public with this information, in each case they expressed frustration with superiors who would not allow it
We also learned the following: The events at the office building that houses the law firm of Patton Boggs were not in fact a very well-guarded secret. Despite denials by Corallo and Luskin, there was intense activity at the office building.
Truthout 5/17/06
PollyUSA: I saw that latest truthout.org bit. What do you make of it? There’s a new article about Rove doing a fundraiser in June for the phone-jammer (or some other) legal fund. That really got my day off to a depressing start.
angie, the grand jury did meet at 1:00 but I have no idea if Fitz was there.
obsessed
I still have my fingers crossed.
I think Vandehei has something.
Miami, Fla.: The blogs are abuzz with reports of Karl Rove’s impending (some say actual)indictment. What’s the story?
Tom Edsall: I think we will know very soon, perhaps as soon as early afternoon. No guarantee, however.
snip
Tom: Is it true that Patrick Fitzgerald met with Karl Rove and his people at Rove’s firm of Patton, Boggs over the weekend to try and reach a “deal”? I heard it from reliable sources and also heard that no deal was reached and that Fitzgerald could be indicting Rove as early as today. What have you heard?
Thanks!
Tom Edsall: Jim VandeHei, who has been ahead of his competitors on this story, has been trying to track down every rumor, including the one you cite. We have not been able to confirm the kind of detail you describe.
WaPo 5/15/06
On Rover- It’s 6 pm in Washington. I guess that means no indictment today? I would imagine that the court closes at five- so no indictment could be filed? Anyone know for sure?
OT - Looks like The Da Vinci Code is not exactly earning rave reviews. I thought the book was pretty awful, but sometimes bad books can make good movies. Not in this case, apparently.
Pollyusa #22 Thanks for that link. I didn’t see that today…..It seems they are trying to be as transparent as possible. More than we can sy for our losers at the MSM
Truthout says that “Fitzgerald is not obliged to make an announcement at any point”.
So apparently, if the indictment comes a year from now, they are vindicated.
Is there any point short of Fitz himself showing up on this panel where defenestration is an acceptable course of action for venting the frustration I have about not being able to go to YearlyKos? Because I think I’m getting close…
I’d love to go to Y-Kos, man, June 10, can’t swing it. I was looking at the attendees list thinking, hmm, can I swing it that soon, then saw the Murray Wass confirmation. Started checking, but can’t book the time off, sigh.
Next year maybe
OT: Watching the Colbert John Gibson exchange, quite funny. But it puts me in mind of a Larry Niven/Stephen Barns novel ‘Saturns Race‘.
The fictional narrative is that the late 21rst century saw massive social change as a result of the ‘population/contraceptive minded’ portion of the western world effectively ’selecting themselves out of existence’.
Since the people who for social, ethnic, material or religious reasons weren’t amenable to the idea of contraception/population control, they eventually overran the population that was, and within a few of generations the contraceptive-population control influence waned altogether.
The setting is centuries after that period, but the idea of natural ’social selection’, struck me as interesting, perhaps Gibson is expressing a similar angst.
That’s quite a lot of firepower you’re moderating there Jane. Nervous much?
Sorry for so many OT
Rumsfeld today on the 6,000 National Guard to be sent to the border with Mexico:
“This will not only not adversely affect America’s ability to conduct the war on terror or respond to other domestic emergencies, it will actually provide useful real-life training for the members of the National Guard.”
You see it’s actually good for them according to the everthoughtful Rumsfeld. I don’t know how many of the National Guard involved would agree.
Still no word on how this circus will be funded.
eep, Murray Waas… my bad.
Now I’m going to read you some phrases and ask if you think each one better describes the Republican Party and its leaders or the Democratic Party and its leaders. . . .”
.
Republican
Party Democratic
Party Both (vol.) Neither (vol.) Unsure
% % % % %
.
“Is concerned with the needs and interests of business and other powerful groups”
5/11-12/06
59 24 7 3 7
.
“Well organized”
5/11-12/06
41 34 6 11 8
.
“Selects good candidates for office”
5/11-12/06
36 40 4 11 9
.
“Is concerned with the needs of people like you”
5/11-12/06
31 54 3 7 5
.
“Able to manage the federal government well”
5/11-12/06
30 47 4 12 7
.
“Can bring about the kind of changes this country needs”
5/11-12/06
30 53 3 8 6
.
“Governs in an honest and ethical way”
5/11-12/06
29 41 6 17 7
.
“Is concerned with the needs and interests of the disadvantaged”
5/11-12/06
22 63 3 6 6
Newsweek
(in every case, the first number listed is the measure for goopers- the second is the measure for dems.
Two points
One- many keep repeating “Yeah goopers are getting hammered but so are the dems”. That’s bullshit if you look at these numbers.
Two- Goopers are fond of sayin “people don’t know what the dems stand for”. That’s total bullshit- these results show that people know very well what dems stand for.
Re: the Hayden hearing not on TV in the morning.
From Cenk at The Young Turks:
Just get to the home page, and the video is right there!
Lou Dobbs is hyperventilating about a Heritage Foundation study that asserts 103 million LEGAL immigrants would be permitted in the next 20 years under the current Senate bill … too many brown folk for his taste?
Leslie in CA #27
Bland book, bland actor, bland director = bland movie. Boy, I never saw that coming!
Leslie in CA at 3:09 pm #27, Faux News was flogging that angle hard all day, so it’s probably good, lol.
That’s great news re: Waas. Hope I can make it. Still up in the air.
OT, but have to share. Just finished grading the last finals. One question was about “backward pairing”- a term related to tests for learning where the order of the reinforcement and the stimulus is reversed.
Define “backward pairing” re: the fly experiments.
An answer I got:
Backward pairing means that flies pair with some other fly outside their own species.
op99 — I just get to be the dumb one and ask the questions. *whew*
Seems like you failed to mention the real news about who would be attending. :)
But Waas is quite a coup, too … congrats!
the 6000 National Guards are there in 2-week shifts — total folk will be over 150,000! Very high turnover. The Guard will be doing their annual required 2-week training down there instead of where they now do it. I suppose it makes sense to do training for Iraq in the Arizona desert instead of Maine or Minnesota forests …
Leslie in CA #27 - how much did the church give the critics?
I gotta say, I’m overwhelmed to be invited to hang in the same room as this crowd. Thanks, Jane, for putting together a stupdendous panel.
I like Ron’s (#17) idea about the podcast for us stay-at-homes.
And as for the breakfast menu, is it possible to find out what Judy and Libby ordered when they had their lengthy breakfast together at the St. Regis?
Jane, dida get my email request for a breakast rez?
If the Leopold article is correct, it stated that Rove had 24 “business hours” from Saturday. That would mean sometime tomorrow.
I read Christy’s Waiting for Godot entry but haven’t had time to read the comments since then. Any Fitz sightings at the GJ today?
Valley Girl - does that explain how we got Dubya?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12836649/
Barbara and Koko sittin’ in a tree……
All my heroes in one room! AAARGH! I do envy those who are going.
Please take lots of still photos too as I can’t do media on my machine.
Thanks
rw cole, about the poll numbers - the one that bothers me is “Governs in an honest and ethical way.” The GOP is at 29% (matching Bush’s lowest GAR to date, interestingly enough), but the Democrats are only at 41%.
And over at dKos, Georgia10 notes that in a May 5-7 Gallup poll, 76% of respondents said Rs and Ds are equally corrupt. Now, the folk who are happy/willing to respond to telephone polls may not be the best-informed people out there. Still, I’d like to see that spread be more like 25-65 going into the midterms.
*ilson46201 @ 3:19 pm (#43) - They’ll have just figured out where the mess hall and coffee shops are and it will be time to leave. I guess I haven’t mentioned today that I think this is a really, really stupid plan.
Jane, same question as Bobby G. re rez email.
Leslie- Good point- and Charlie Cook addresses that in his latest report- claims it’s why he stays an independant.
emptywheel at 45 — I was just thinking the same thing. Excellent work, Jane. Can’t wait for the conference — and the breakfast. :)
twolf1 - yes, probably a backward pairing. I was hoping someone would make that connection ;)
Jane 41, if you’re lucky, it’ll be a 3 ring circus all on its own, like the Franken/Ivins/O’Reilly panel that Pat Schroeder fucked up lol. What a humdinger that turned out to be.
twolf1 #44
A mediocre film made controversial by religious wingnuts is the kind of publicity that I bet most marketing folk would kill for. The real question is how much did the producers pay the church.
Oh Hell! I’ve been bumping into walls around here trying to console myself that I can’t go this year and now this! I always catch Murray on Democracy Now and this panel that has been assembled is such a mega event! Question? For those of us sitting at home humming to ourselves whilest you are suping of the intellectual and friendly brainfest are their going to be any live bloggers or videos available? Dumb question probably, but just wanted to remain hopeful.
In October Fitzgerald issued a Media Advisory on the same day he announced the Libby indictment.
twolf1, I don’t think the Cannes film festival was packed with Opus Dei members. Not only was there no applause after TDVC finished, it actually got some boos and hisses. Someone - sorry, can’t remember who - made a comment to the effect that the book, while mediocre in itself, addresses some interesting questions, which sounds about right to me. I would have liked to have seen someone make a film that raised the questions without being dull, but the odds were against it.
VG 40, that’s what makes teaching such a rewarding profession.
Valley Girl, If you’re in Maine this summer visit me! I’m near Belfast. And no, i’m not a Mainer nor are my children who were born here. If your cat had kittens in the oven, you wouldn’t call them biscuits woudja?
Almost embarassed to admit it wasn’t until the April 06 disclosures did I realize my much longed for Woodstein of Plame was Waas
Don’t think it took the then establishment so long to follow up on all of Woodward-Bernstein’s story.
Was really struck by the difference when Tobin’s (NH phone jammin’ boy) 22 calls to WH were disclosed recently - Woodward’s interest in the original burglarly was piqued when one of the burglars (McCord?) had WH phone #’s on him
Froomkin is right - Get On It - Now!
I thought Truthout, Leopold, Plame, and Larry were the same people?
Will they discuss the stock market crash and Russian and China’s threats if we attack Iran(Plame studied this BEFORE the State Department begun the desk).
Leslie in CA, maybe the 14 people who haven’t read the book will like it.
Sorry, that should have been JAR, not GAR, in my comment #52.
Jane,
Your Plame panel will be amazing. EW is right Waas is the “gold standard”, if it comes from Waas you can take it to the bank.
I did get everyone’s emails and I emailed you back. Looking forward to seeing everyone in person there.
Hugh 59, good point. I for one will go see anything the catholic church doesn’t want me to.
Hear, hear!
Frankly, I think you should invite Victoria Toensing to keep it fair and balanced.
-GSD
Ray McGovern is coming up on Loulou Dobbs!
pollyusa 69 — I hope you are going to be there! I am saving you a seat next to me ;)
mary jane- #64 that would be great! Thanks. First 2 weeks of July. Jane has my email. We’ll connect some way or other before then.
I did not read The DaVinci Code, and probably will not. My wife loves it (but, then, she likes “Pride & Prejudice” too). I just find religion stuff pretty dopey. Have to laugh at all these groups getting so worked up over this movie.
op99 67, that reminds me of a Far Side cartoon - big ballroom with a banner saying something like, “First Annual Convention of the North American Didn’t Like Dances With Wolves Society.” And maybe half a dozen people in the room. The “Did Like TDVC” Society might have similar numbers.
Jane — just FYI — I reserved breakfast for two since my hubby will be there as well. If I’ve paid extra, just use whatever that is for someone else who needs some fundage donation. :)
I did not read the DaVinci Code
Athiest, my head would explode
I did not see the DaVinci Code movie
too many critics say its not too groovy.
If the Democrats can link the Republican octopus of corruption together in basic and easy to dollow narrative, they will be able to make the Republicans look institutionally corrupt.
There are enough current Democratic scandals going on–though not Abramoff related or even remotely related to the continued power grab hijinx of the Republicans—there is enough to throw smoke—Pat Kennedy, Mollohan, Jefferson, the McKinney incident.
But if the Dems can paint the Delay, Abramoff sleazy money, anti-democratic Phone jamming, Rove and Libby scams as being a big old ball of collusion-which they are-they have won the debate.
-GSD
Does anybody have the link to Fitzy’s website they can post? Maybe we oughta be keeping an eye on it…
Thank you.
Wow, cool! Waas has been fantastic in his tenacity and accuracy. Meanwhile, Jason Leopold seems to have crawled back under his rock, with no Rove indictment in sight.
best fitz link
this is the one you get if you go to the main page and click on the top secret invisible “legal proceedings” link
Don’t forget to ask if they threw Rove under the same bus they threw Libby under? Was that so they could get Libby out from under it and on board for the trip to club fed? Is there a big white house reunion planned at the club and Rove is hosting it so they want both on board, (Libby is the original bus boy)? Does Chaney have his ticket yet or does his high position mean that he’ll get special transport? It won’t be much of a party without the big boss, Bush. Is he going too?
PZ Myers 92 last thread - hope to meet you in LV, I’m a regular lurker at Pharyngula, great blog. Yours in Christ (just kiddin’), op99
Special Counsel Website
none: there’s still plenty of confident bluster under the rock to which you allude, but, that said, my depressometer is running very high lately.
What the heck - the link was live in Preview.
Leslie in CA 78, I was one of them lol. Not so much DWW, but just the thought of Kevin Costner makes me break out in a bad rash.
Here, let me try (this is the main page):
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/iln/osc/
AhhhhGHGH…..No Fitz today…
It just does not look like its going to happen…I just keep thinking, if the indictment really was going to happen, some MSM would have at least reported more fully on the possibility….
damn it all to hell
Leslie: try [a href=” url “> text ]
How difficult/expensive to do a live video stream of the panel .. ?
Tee hee, crooksandliars noticed that Tony Snow described ABC as a “competing network” during his press conference. :)
GSD 73:
For the dunk tank? Might make a few exta bucks for FDL that way. Add some piranha and make a few more.
I’ve had that Fitzy page up all day — I’ve been regularly hitting F5. I feel like such a Skinnerian pigeon…
op99 — that’s funny. Didn’t see PZ Meyers, will have to go look now.
aha! Today Dobbs had on his Pundit Panel somebody named Miguel … it’s a small step.
Do we think Fitz would post to his website prior to a public announcement?
http://www.hsh.com/today.html
30 year fixed mortgage rates hit 6.88%.
We’re approaching housing bubble burst time- fasten yer seatbelts- this is gonna be a rough ride.
Jane 98, *g*, hope I didn’t offend anyone, as is my wont.
Maybe we can book as a target for the pie toss.
-GSD
Anyone know how many people the Plame panel conference room will hold? If I decide to come at the last minute, any chance I CAN”T get in??
RWCole, what happens around 7?
-GSD
I know the bubble in New England is already leaking like a 90 year old at a keg party.
-GSD
Jane, it’s absolutely fantastic to nab Waas. Congratulations!
Thanks for linking every Plamegate article by Waas; it’s invaluable.
Also, your “Exhibit A,” “Exhibit B” and “Exhibit C” observation is both funny and true! Thanks for articulating it so nicely; it helps me put some of the competing tales in better perspective. Waas has always been the most credible reporter on matters Plamegate.
a winger on Dobbs wrote in complaining about the Official White House Website had the option of English or Spanish. I’m proud that I did the first bilingual Congressional website in ‘97 - even the Hispanic Caucus thought it was cool.
Waas plays Murray Storm, a gonzo journalist investigating links between some mobsters, crooked cops, and crooked politician, and suddenly everything turns into a classic revenge movie prototype: The bad guys kill Storm’s family, and leave him for dead. After waking up from a seven-year coma, Storm sets out for vengeance.
‘Hard to kill Rove’ is an entertaining action movie. The amount of limb-snapping may be lower than usual for a Waas movie, but the fight scenes are good. An added bonus is the fact that ‘Hard to kill Rove’ features some of Waas’s best lines and moments (”I’m gonna take you to the bank, president Bush. To the blood bank!”).
*ilson– my SO said to that report “huh, it does?” I said yuh-huh– same idiot who pretends to spekey da spanish and says: the National Anthem should be sung in Ennngllush.
GSD 73
“Frankly, I think you should invite Victoria Toensing to keep it fair and balanced.
-GSD”
Can’t we get Judy Miller?
there’s even out floating on the Internets an old pic of George Bush carrying a Mexican flag. Pendejo!
Batocchio — he is and I think two things are true: everyone who writes on Plame knows how valuable he is and take it for granted that everyne else does, and people in the traditional media have no idea how important his work is. I hope we can do more to highlight that.
PS I don’t say this to nudge anyone but we are getting reservations like crazy right now. I don’t want anyone not to be able to come so I’d recommend making your reservations earlier rather than later.
obsessed, thanks - I do links all the time, usually w/no problem. But I did that one rapidly so may have missed something.
op99, I don’t mind Costner, though I haven’t seen his recent stuff. I do like The Untouchables, though - and no, that’s not a post-Fitz thing! *g*
Back when the Libby announcements were made, Fitzgerald did not have another, pending case where the defense was hyperventilating to get the information that might be asserted in the indictment. It will happen when (and if) it happens. The silver lining if nothing happens until the KOS panel is getting to pick all the brains there.
Well, here’s something you can chew over at your conference, if you like. I cannot vouch for this as it comes from Wayne Madsen, a former NSA employee who has it out for the administration. From:
www.waynemadsenreport.com
May 16, 2006 — From May 5, 2006 pre-trial hearing re: Scooter Libby indictment.
Libby attorney Theodore Wells intends to shift blame to Ambassador Joseph Wilson and Marc Grossman. Today, Fitzgerald and Wells will be back in front of Judge Reggie Walton in pre-trial hearings at the US Courthouse in Washington. Any future trial of Karl Rove will likely follow this same template.
THE COURT: Are you going to be seeking to introduce any evidence about what Wilson discovered on the trip and what he reported back?
MR. FITZGERALD: No, Your Honor. There will be controversies. But when Mr. Libby says, for example, he didn’t approve forgeries, we won’t disagree. We won’t disagree that Mr. Wilson was not sent by the vice president. What will come up are the conversations where Mr. Libby says to someone did the vice president send him on the trip and he said no. The vice president asked a question. In response to the question, the CIA sent him on a trip by themselves. He came back. He reported to the CIA and then in May of ‘03 this controversy breaks out. We are not going to dispute the substance. We will dispute that he did talk to people about Wilson’s wife and the relevance will be the conversations, for example, the best one is Mr. Grossman when Mr. Libby asks him what he knows about the trip. Mr. Grossman didn’t know about the trip either. He found out and came back and said, my understanding is that his wife works at the CIA and people are saying she was involved in sending him on the trip which is what he tells Mr. Libby which goes directly to the relevance of whether or not Mr. Libby’s testimony is true. Mr. Grossman separately has a report prepared all about the trip and the substance of it the so-called INR report which Mr. Libby never sees. We don’t intend to offer the INR report. We produce it in discovery. But we are not going down the road of trying the case of whether or not Mr. Wilson is right or Mr. Libby is right or whose view of this. It is simply whether or not Mr. Libby told the truth.
MR. WELLS: Now let’s return to Mr. Grossman. Mr. Grossman is going to take the stand and he’s going to say this is what I did. I asked for a report to be prepared. I met with Mr. Libby and I told him certain things. Now let’s assume I want to show this jury that Mr. Grossman is not being totally truthful, that I want to show, for example, that Mr. Grossman went to college with Mr. Wilson and they were classmates and throughout their careers they traveled together through the State Department and the diplomatic arena from college right on through. I want to give you a sample of just two emails that are classified so you will see the importance of these documents for purposes of discovery and how they may permit me to materially advance my examination of Mr. Grossman and to try to show that he is