Comments on: FDL Late Nite: What Are YOU Wearing to Yearly Kos?

By: myb

myb — Fri, 16 Jun 2006 03:26:47 +0000

yup

By: RubDMC

RubDMC — Fri, 19 May 2006 02:23:20 +0000

I’ll be the guy with the open-necked rayon shirt, lots of gold chains, and a pinky ring. You can’t miss me in a crowd.

BTW, my PayPal registration for the breakfast bonanza sez e-mktg assocs, but my real name is RubDMC. Glad I jumped on that one.

By: Matt O.

Matt O. — Thu, 18 May 2006 20:16:14 +0000

Rayne
I guess I am just S.O.L. I will, however, have a digital camera.

Bob
That was pretty good.

By: anne

anne — Thu, 18 May 2006 18:28:07 +0000

Arggggh! Do you have room for one more at the breakfast? This is one of the main reasons I registered and was travling overseas without e-mail access when you announced the deadline for registering. Can I please sign up? Pretty please?

Please e-mail me and let me know!

Thanks!

By: looseheadprop

looseheadprop — Thu, 18 May 2006 15:32:49 +0000

What heppend to the HAyde thread? I just came back here and the got this thread at the home page. Waddup?

By: Old Sow

Old Sow — Thu, 18 May 2006 15:07:05 +0000

Or lunch…….

By: Old Sow

Old Sow — Thu, 18 May 2006 15:04:11 +0000

Susan, EPU’d at Waas was answered there, and MaryJane from Belfast emailed me at the address I left there. She’ll drive up and join us in Ellsworth when we can set a date. FLD Breakfast Downeast Maine, anyone else interested?

By: punaise

punaise — Thu, 18 May 2006 15:00:25 +0000

Cliff Varnell 216

…that is a scary nightmare.

_____

there are about 10 albums on my 5 album desert island list. (so sue me. :~)
one of the Late Nites we should launch a general call out for folks to chime in with theirs.

By: looseheadprop

looseheadprop — Thu, 18 May 2006 14:05:52 +0000

Not endorsing the Wayne Madson report or anything. I am a professional sceptic on this.

However, at least his details sound more consistetn with SOP. But only just a little bit.

I don’t remember any report of Gonzales meeting w/the GJ before the return of the Libby indictment. I never saw the AG meet with a GJ I was involved with, nor even my local US attorney. There is no reason. Before you take the indictment in for the “true bill” vote, it has to be signed off by the US Attorney.
Since Fitz stands in the shoes of the AG, he does not need a sign off (though if he did not feel the Abu had a conflict, he might run it past him as a courtesy)

Abu showing up sounds weird, but maybe it was at Abu’s own request. Abu has done other weird things.

Had it not been for the confirmed sighting of PJF at the President’s lawyer’s law firm right before the Libby indictment, I would be scoffing outright at the idea that he showed up at Patton Boggs.

The EAGLE DOES NOT FLY. Defense lawyers come to visit the government, not the other way around.

The tidbit about Luskin becoming a target, intrests me. That has some possibilites that stir the imagination.

It is also consistent with and would explain something I heard from the foley square rumor mill a while ago, but didn’t understand at the time, and would explain why Luskin became so quiet as of late.

I have not made a secret of my scepticism regarding the Leapold report. While I am miles and miles away from buying into the Madsen thing, I must admit, it has me intrigued.

By: Christy Hardin Smith

Christy Hardin Smith — Thu, 18 May 2006 14:00:57 +0000

HAHAHAHA Bob — Oh, man. That’s hilarious. Perhaps Taylor and I can work that out for you…after all, what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. ;-)