Comments on: NARAL-CT Head Backs Ned Lamont http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/ Firedoglake weblog Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:55:23 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: notableabsence http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-106100 notableabsence Tue, 16 May 2006 17:34:35 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-106100 <p>FYI, NOW endorsed Ned Lamont for the primary as well…just hadn’t seen that news up here and thought it was relevant. </p> <p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/ll3h8">http://tinyurl.com/ll3h8</a></p> FYI, NOW endorsed Ned Lamont for the primary as well…just hadn’t seen that news up here and thought it was relevant.

http://tinyurl.com/ll3h8

]]> By: Bomboniera http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-106077 Bomboniera Tue, 16 May 2006 17:08:05 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-106077 <p><i>I was told that they didn’t really think the vote was “significant” and didn’t count cloture votes in their endorsement scorecards.</i></p> <p>Jane. You make it sound like you called and got “La di da, no big deal…” </p> <p>I told you repeatedly that I didn’t know what would happen with the cloture vote. I told you that I couldn’t say with any degree of certainty <strong>if</strong> it would affect the endorsement, and if so, how much. I told you that the people who make those decisions hadn’t met yet. I kept offering to have someone get back to you, someone who could speak with more authority. But you’re still asserting that NARAL told you the cloture vote wasn’t significant and wouldn’t be counted, end of story. At that moment, I didn’t know any of those things for sure, and I didn’t tell you I did.</p> I was told that they didn’t really think the vote was “significant” and didn’t count cloture votes in their endorsement scorecards.

Jane. You make it sound like you called and got “La di da, no big deal…”

I told you repeatedly that I didn’t know what would happen with the cloture vote. I told you that I couldn’t say with any degree of certainty if it would affect the endorsement, and if so, how much. I told you that the people who make those decisions hadn’t met yet. I kept offering to have someone get back to you, someone who could speak with more authority. But you’re still asserting that NARAL told you the cloture vote wasn’t significant and wouldn’t be counted, end of story. At that moment, I didn’t know any of those things for sure, and I didn’t tell you I did.

]]> By: 60yoh http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105346 60yoh Tue, 16 May 2006 01:29:36 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105346 <p>a quim-bat cat costume..lol!<br /> wth is a quim-bat…</p> a quim-bat cat costume..lol!
wth is a quim-bat…

]]> By: Muzzy http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105311 Muzzy Tue, 16 May 2006 01:03:37 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105311 <p>cbl, here’s a try: <a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v206/walkerdixon/Rascula.jpg">Rascula and Quim-bat</a> Rascal looks like the devil in this but with a narrow beard these days is a lot more handsome ;) </p> <p><a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v206/walkerdixon/lilQuim.jpg">Little Miss’ first day at home</a></p> cbl, here’s a try: Rascula and Quim-bat Rascal looks like the devil in this but with a narrow beard these days is a lot more handsome ;)

Little Miss’ first day at home

]]> By: mui http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105267 mui Tue, 16 May 2006 00:35:57 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105267 <p>Oh yes, how can anyone of us forget what NARAL did? That was like a coathanger in the back. I did write thanks to Chris Dodd though & Kennedy & Kerry but not . . . you know who.</p> Oh yes, how can anyone of us forget what NARAL did? That was like a coathanger in the back. I did write thanks to Chris Dodd though & Kennedy & Kerry but not . . . you know who.

]]> By: Old Sow http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105265 Old Sow Tue, 16 May 2006 00:34:34 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105265 <p>Stephen Parrish at 36</p> <p>a “remote” chance.. a pun on purpose?</p> Stephen Parrish at 36

a “remote” chance.. a pun on purpose?

]]> By: mui http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105263 mui Tue, 16 May 2006 00:33:31 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105263 <p>And last but not least, hello angie!</p> And last but not least, hello angie!

]]> By: mui http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105258 mui Tue, 16 May 2006 00:32:04 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105258 <p>Thank you Carolyn and thank you Bob Adams.<br /> And thank you FDL for bleeping out that bleep that compared elections to segregationists. Sorry, I went ballistic.</p> Thank you Carolyn and thank you Bob Adams.
And thank you FDL for bleeping out that bleep that compared elections to segregationists. Sorry, I went ballistic.

]]> By: Everythingseemsoneat http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105225 Everythingseemsoneat Tue, 16 May 2006 00:19:26 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105225 <p>“Mustn’t play on anyone’s fears”</p> “Mustn’t play on anyone’s fears”

]]> By: Bob Adams http://firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105224 Bob Adams Tue, 16 May 2006 00:19:01 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/15/naral-ct-head-backs-ned-lamont/#comment-105224 <p>And you too, Valley Girl! <b>Thanks!</b></p> And you too, Valley Girl! Thanks!

]]>