
The Pod has an extremely high volume setting and is famous for his ability to displace vast amounts of water and reflect direct light from the top of his head.
See? You can play it too. It's easy. The Pod will show you how. He was on Hannity & Colmes today talking about his new oeuvre on Hillary Clinton, and how when he calls her a bitch he only means it in the best possible way (Crooks & Liars has the clip):
HANNITY: It is a great admonition. It is a great warning, and I fully agree with you: They better not, to quote a phrase, "misunderestimate her." You say -- you describe for example -- you use the B-word to describe her.
PODHORETZ: I do, but I use the B-word to describe her and say that that is a virtue as the first woman presidential, you know, possibility.
HANNITY: Explain that, because you know what? A lot of people are going to get -- look, I know you, and you're a tell-it-like-it-is guy, but some people may misunderstand that.
PODHORETZ: OK, I'll put it to you very simply: The first woman president has to be somebody who has qualities that will convey to people that she can stand up before [North Korean leader] Kim Jong Il, [Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad, Osama bin Laden, all the worst men in the world, that she can pull the trigger when she has to, that she can negotiate, that she can stand tough and stand tall. Therefore, the first woman president has to be somebody who has qualities that we commonly associate with being unfeminine. She's got to be tough, she's got to be steely, she's got to be adversarial, and she's got to be difficult.
COLMES: That's pretty harsh language and pretty hateful language, I would think. And then you say -- you call her flat and unwomanly. Why would you degrade another human being like this?
PODHORETZ: Hey, I'm saying she's the first -- she's going to be the first woman president of the United States. I don't think that's very degrading.
I get it, Pod. So if I called you a chubby, bald little crap juggler who'd starve if it wasn't for wingnut welfare and nepotism, it would be, like, a testament to your incredible sex appeal?
(I think the Pod's cubicle might be a bit too close to Ramesh's -- Ramesh is now very upset that people like Andrew Sullivan think his book, entitled The Party of Death, might be about the Democratic Party -- just because the book jacket says it is.)
I was reading this bit from Roll Call this morning on the big telecom companies who oppose internet neutrality and I was struck by much the same feeling as when listening to the Pod:
I don't see where this is political," said BellSouth spokesman Bill McCloskey. "It just seems odd for the Democrats to take an anti-consumer position - to say the government should set rules to deny consumers choice."
I'll leave it to someone much smarter than me to explain exactly how making all the internet sites that can't pay AT&T vig load much slower than the megasites who can is tantamount to denying consumers a choice. But it's a shining example of a phenomenon that I believe needs its own name: wingnut ideas that appropriate the language of the left because they know they should be ashamed and don't want to take responsibility for what they're saying.
We have the Bush's Clear Skies Act (which turned back 30 years of pollution control) and Healthy Forest Initiative (which allowed clear-cutting trees). Then there was the positively Orwellian "peacekeeper missile." The list goes on. And on. And on.
The Pod doesn't want to take responsibility on TV for calling Hillary a flat, unfeminine bitch because he knows he crossed the line. So now it's a compliment, it means she's tough, steely, full of resolve -- good strong, feminist traits, right? Only it doesn't. It means she's a bitch. But it's out there anyway. Damage done, clean getaway, eh Pod?
Maybe not so fast. I was casting around this morning for a good name for this particular bit of hypocrisy, and Adam Green of Moveon suggested " Progressive In Language, Except Conservative Right Aiming Principle" -- otherwise known as PILECRAP.
They may bash the left but when they borrow our language they admit that our principles, our ideas, our values and beliefs -- like peace, clean skies, healthy forests, strong women, consumer choice -- are better than theirs.
And that's no PILECRAP.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
Fitz!!
Mrs. Sharkbabe Fitzgerald
Well, he’s in a position to know about “womanly.” After all, he definitely has larger breasts than Hillary.
And a happy Fitzo de Mayo to you TWO.
aargh, me eyes!!!
It’s Lee Raymond’s just-as-evil twin!
Onto Mary Cheney.
How is she going to react to the caluclated effort by her fathers party to fire up the gay hatred on the right just to drive the religious zealots to the polls? Will she think that Karl Rove is a “bad man”…..Will she mouth “Go fuck yourself” to Pat Robertson, Sam Brownback, Rick Santorum or John McCain?
From the Wapoo:
“Karl Rove, Bush’s top political adviser, and GOP leaders are well aware of the problem and planning a summer offensive to win back conservatives with a mix of policy fights and warnings of how a Democratic Congress would govern. The plan includes votes on tax cuts, a constitutional amendment outlawing gay marriage, new abortion restrictions and measures to restrain government spending.”
-GSD
err..calculated.
-GSD
I’ve never seen a person who’s neck is fatter than his head.
Re: “The Pod has a has an extremely high volume setting”
Didn’t Apple release a firmware fix for that?
One wise friend of mine once explained that when someone says, “It’s not personal,” that just means its not personal to them.
Love the screen shot — he looks like a Dugong
http://www.weebls-stuff.com/toons/dugong/
Jane Hamsher of the left, it’s “Clear Skies” not, “Clean” (literally)
two teensy typos,
hypocrisy, and the 2nd forests. ;)
“Ugly as sin” is quite wrong. Sin has to be made attractive to get folk to abandon their better instincts. The wordsmiths of the right understand this maxim well. Affirmative-action is denounced as racism. Jane has given other better examples above …
GSD– she just called John McCain an honorable and good man…
Hey sean, your BOSS..rupeck murdock is giving money to a HILLARY CLINTON fund raiser…
OPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPSSSSSSSSSS……I guess you better shut your mouth about her..right?
Sharkbabe 2, it takes quite a man to reel you in, lol.
These fucks really have destroyed language itself. And they still control huge amounts of what goes into the mass reptile brain.
That Hannity/Pod exchange: as Charles Ryder’s dad was fond of saying, such a lot of nonsense.
Ever since that pic of Pod in the pool, never been able to take him seriously. Not that I did before that anyway.
GSD,
Relax,the spelling police are off tonight
I see the logic. So I just wanted to say that Bush is a f*cking bastard who gives other f*cking bastards a bad name and I mean that in the best possible way.
err-guess I was wrong about the spelling police
I’m sorry, I don’t want this to get lost at the end of the last thread so U’m posting it again;
talk about revisionst histry, this is scary stuff
from think progress
Jane, thank you for saying something so clean and honest that I feel I can breath for a few minutes before I immerse myself back in the foul sewage that is the news of the day.
You give me hope.
Carolyn
the transcript won’t be up till tomorrow, but i’d like to include an ugly exchange on hardball.
of course, tweety, bob shrum and ed rogers chortled with laughter at rogers’ response to a jeb bush/hillary clinton match-up: ‘he’d beat her like a broken mule’.
I can’t believe you are giving credibility to that sack of shit by paying him any attention.
Jane- typo I assume AT&T vig load = AT&T big load but I have made some stupid mistakes before.
You know what wingnuts dream of even more than towel snapping fratboy man-on-dog love? The fantasy of being anally raped by Hilary with a strap-on!
So if I call Pod a lying sack of shit, it just means that I’m impressed by his manliness, right?
20, the spelling police never rest, but just on the main post.
cheney on colbert– to be honest with you, i did not find him funny.
well, duh.
“Empowerment” is a perfectly good word they’ve pile-crappped on.
Knut Wicksell 24, if they’re on TV they must be answered, refuted, ridiculed.
GSD 7 - Mary Cheney is the antichrist. Her book and her little turn on the runway and her comments to the media are pushing my every creepshow button every bit as much as her stone evil father, but even creepily more so. She is THE FUCK EVIL SHIT.
op99 - yeah, that and a come-hither foot (huh? what’s this?)
a compliment to the commenters here: as a spelling-nazi myself, I find the comments to be amazingly correct in spelling and grammar. Quite a high level of literacy and keyboarding skills…
Re: Mary Cheney - I don’t really care about her sex life - but I have come to the conclusion that Mary Cheney is not a very nice person. But then look who her parents are. Look at the examples she’s had to emulate.
Are we sure she was looking at Edwards, and not at her father, when she mouthed “Go f*ck yourself?”
Karl Rove is mistaken if he thinks people are more afraid of gay people getting married than they are of him and his ilk.
There’s a movement afoot to make the word “bitch” gender neutral in some contexts…I think it’s something to do with prisons…Hannity and Pod and all the other neo-con chickenhawks ain’t nuth’n but punk ass bitches!!
Quite a high level of literacy and keyboarding skills…
excluding, sadly, me….
Jane, you seem to have a mental block when it comes to spelling “hypocrisy”. BTW, lest you think I’m mocking, I can’t spell “guarantee” without looking it up. I’ve been unable to spell it all my life. Don’t know why.
the rest of cheney on colbert:
“…why if I had a shotgun i’d…”
Sharkbabe 32, hope ya get a second chance, grab it with both hands, so to speak.
34
Anne says:
May 10th, 2006 at 7:02 pm (#34) If there’s such a thing as the meanness gene, I doubt Mary Cheney would have been a nice person if she’d been raised by Buddhist monks.
I thought the article I read said she’d mouthed the words to her father, perhaps meaning that this was her opinion of what Edwards had said.
“Therefore, the first woman president has to be somebody who has qualities that we commonly associate with being unfeminine.”
I think that this kind of asinine and truly stupid mindless sexist potty-talk is part of an intentional planned campaign by reactionaries to limit political participation of women, to split forces of moderates and non-political majority (both men and women) who would naturally be opposed to Bush, and generally scam, play infantilize and chumpify political discourse in the US. See my EPU’d comment at end of last thread.
And it is so common, most people probably barely notice it. I note that it took FDL a very short while to find an example of this junk after two posts on related topics. So, in the face of this propaganda, one wonders why women would be reluctant to blog or become national political leaders?
I find the kind of sexist political discussion very weird and disturbing. It is part of the Vast Rightwing Conspiracy, no doubt about it in my mind. Disclaimer: I’m no H. Clinton fan.
You know, if I was HRC, I’d call Faux and ask for a chair right next to Pod. And I’d give him the cold up-and-down elevator look, make him squirm.
And if the talking heads mentioned the Pod’s use of the B-word, I’d say, “Hell f*cking yeah, I’m a bitch with brass balls bigger than the ones you think you have. What about it?”
What is it about the right that they groom and then coddle these brainless, spineless lardballs to shape public opinion?
Cujo, I too have noticed that persistent spelling-block concerning “hypocrisy”. Personally, I can never easily remember how to spell “personnel”…dunno why.
‘PILECRAP? PILECRAP, you say?’
;>)
cujo 37, that’s because it’s supposed to have a “goddamn” in the middle of it, i.e. “I gauran-goddamn-tee it.”
Troll 26 - I think they’re dying for it, really and truly. Perhaps while blowing Gannon. Twisted as hell bunch of crazed repressives.
BBC, Brits calling for closing of Guantanamo, including the poodle.
The Wednesday Night Mugging? Rape? Assault? Battery?
NSA denies the justice department clearance to look into NSA spying on Grandmas phonecalls to Aunt Ethel.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12727867/from/RSS/
-GSD
Zenn,
The Poodle is in the low 20% in ratings in the UK.
-GSD
45 “I guaran-goddamn-tee it.†the spelling police blushes.
GSD
Tears are my only response to that article.
No big deal but it’s oeuvre. Can anyone tell me why these guys have a Hillary fixation? I mean she isn’t that popular on the blogs and I don’t think she’s that popular in the country. But they can think of nothing and no one else apparently. Are they that out of touch or just stupid and lazy?
(thanks op99 39)
I wrote a piece back in March about the word “detainee” and how that PILECRAP came about in the face of neocon needs.
http://getintheirface.blogspot.....error.html
The theft of language seems to be one of the strengths of the GOP! I think you hit it right on the head Jane. They know our ideas are better. They know there ideas can’t stand the fierce aintispeptic of public scrutiny… So they steal the shiny coating off of the Left’s good ideas and wrap their turds in them.
It’s people like Pod who give short balding fat guys a bad name
Specter et al just got handed a ton of ammo on Hadley by this stunt, GSD.
Turley handed the Congress their asshats on their lack of any meaningful investigation on this debacle tonite on KO.
This is a government that does. not. work.
re: The Wednesday Night Mugging? Rape? Assault? Battery? #48
WTF
Not* OT :
Tower of Fitz!
(*save in a recursive/obsessional sense….
but I’m slothfully late to the thread for tomfitzery…)
Wow, talking about sexism and out pops a perfect example. Disgusting. Appalling. Regressive. and most obviously Scared.
From last thread, zennurse: “There are a number of physican blogs I’ve found, largely by men, but there are some very interesting ones about nursing which are largely by women. I’m sorry to see that, but hope it will change.”
My wife is a psychiatrist and I can only imagine the (additional) good she’d be able to do with a blog. However, I can already hear her response: “and WHEN would I do this?” She still isn’t home from work. Maybe that’s why I understand and empathasize with the last two threads - raising a child, working, keeping house - that’s ME! Don’t get me wrong, wouldn’t change a thing, but I’ve got a unique perspective amongst my male friends :)
Speaking of…time to go play games with my lovely daughter.
the right wing has been stealing language for some time — never forget “Arbeit macht frei”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vig
immanentize #36
When in doubt blame the keyboard. I always do.
I am not a Hillary fan at all (though I would vote for her over a Republican in a general election) but what he just said is disgraceful. Simply disgraceful.
Honey, I know nobody likes the poodle, it’s just fun to say that someone is saying it on a respected radio show.
He wasn’t the one, it was some minister he was agreeing with.
One of my little pollyanna dreams, no more gitmo, and justice for all.
http://www.wordreference.com/ is a good thing to bookmark to check foreign words. Also here’s a handy dandy spell check for french or spanish:
http://www.thesolutioncafe.com.....ecker.html
OK *ilson, that cannot be topped, but I have always liked this country’s program: “Atoms for Peace”
The Collapse of Bushism:
“In the space of 12 months, Russia and China have managed to move the pieces on the geopolitical chess board of Eurasia away from what had been an overwhelming US strategic advantage, to the opposite, where the US is increasingly isolated. It’s potentially the greatest strategic defeat for the US power projection of the post-World War II period. This is also the strategic background to the re-emergence of the so-called realist faction in US policy.”
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/HE09Ad01.html
-GSD
rat bastahd 59, then it sounds like you’re mis-”handled” - you sound like a doll to me.
Oh. My. God. Jane Hamsher, you are one evil bitch, in all the nicest ways of course!
I am completely out of breath. My sides are aching. Though I can’t say whether its from laughing or trying to hold my dinner down - or both!
52, hugh: my own theory is that the “R” team wants to play up the importance of Hillary so as to try and get her nominated. The “R” team figures that they’ll soundly defeat her in a general election, but they worry that she won’t get the “D” team nomination.
Ghostman
The Hillary thing among wingnut males really amounts to a full-blown psychosis.
They Gotta Have Her, Kill Her, Have Her…
The DOJ has shutdown the NSA probe because none of the investigators were given a security clearance. Fucking Abu “Don’tswearmein” Gonzalez!
Outfuckingrageous.
read it at dailykos
I like anybody who has “rat” in their handle.
So now all the congresscritters who say they want an investigation into the illegal spying must insist on it now, since the JD was stopped, right?
RIGHT???
omg.
sharkbabe at 73 –
Should I change my handle to “Immanentize the Rat?”
Gosh, I’ve been out all day. . .
I thought you people were going to indict somebody while I was gone!? Wazzup?
VG must be around, cleaning me up and making me presentable ;)
By the way, I wish I was a bitch. Instead I’m just a prick.
You know, somebody’s doing the business with Hillary. It’s just hard to tell what that business is.
For instance, the DLC (including Hillary) gets their underwear in a bunch about Howard Dean, and finding nothing they can trash about him, they start a whisper campaign that he’s “far left” and “unelectable” (read Crashing the Gates on this). The ‘wingers picked up the ball and ran with it, natch.
And Karl Rove says, “Yeah, I’d love Dean to be the candidate.”
So what does Murdoch’s fundraising and the Pod’s bassackwards praise say about the ‘wingers position on Hillary?
Are they positioning her for a tumble, or is she their DINO?
Jane Hamsher, you are one evil bitch, in all the nicest ways of course!
Did you see V for Vendetta? Jane is V and words are her dancing knives.
VG — No vig is short for “vigorish”
http://www.answers.com/vigorish&r=67
I went through a spell where I read nothing but mafia books. Sometimes it shows.
This thing with Rupert and Hillary. I have a theory. Maybe Rupert is giving her money so she wins the nomination because he knows she would not win, and then we are stuck with a Republican president for another four years.
Personally, I don’t think Hillary, at least now, is electable nationally, and I think Rupert knows that.
RE the Hillary obsession of the impotent men of Wingnuttia: its simple projection. They still haven’t worked out their issues with their abusive mothers. Intelligent, repressed, and extremely ambitious mothers who made their sons pay for the sins of their fathers, who in turn grew up to be misogynistic pigs.
Well, that is one theory anyway.
VG @ 25 & BK @ 61
Urban Dictionary: vig
very appropo.
immanentize, nah, yer perfect as is.
Mary Cheney, however, should be eaten by rats.
they would love for Hilary to run. she polls indifferently at best and they just can’t wait to resurrect her national healthcare immolation. she has brains but little TV charm. no Q factor, no votes. besides, she’d be a slow moving, defenseless target. if she fights back she’s a bitch. if she doesn’t she’s another democratic wimp. sorry Hil, we have to take a pass.
“So if I called you a chubby, bald little crap juggler who’d starve if it wasn’t for wingnut welfare and nepotism, it would be, like, a testament to your incredible sex appeal?”
This is simultaneously brilliant and scary. I hope that you never get mad at me.
“I went through a spell where I read nothing but mafia books. Sometimes it shows.”
LOL Me too. Long before the Sopranos. Fugedaboudit ; )
OP99
Here’s a good writers’ tool. I’ve never used it for blogging (and probably should) but I’ve used the corporate and techical version for several years. Very handy application and works with just about any application from word to webmail.
http://www.whitesmoke.com/index.html
just saw on CNN the ad for Neil Young’s new album with the tagline: “You be the decider!” …way cool
Jane, thanks. Thanks to Blank Kludge I finally got it, in general, at least. But I didn’t get the Mafia connection! So appropriate. Some typo changes have been made in your absence. Please check.
Years ago, Gore Vidal got into it with Midge Dector and Norman Podhoretz - I forgot the cause of conflict. What I remember is that Gore, when he finally unleashed the inevitable coup de grace, referred to the two of the as…..”the waddling pods”.
That’s our boy.
OT - i found a cartoon portraying the ASSHAT — as was discussed a few threads ago.
OT kind of but still about the peculiar use Republicans make of information.
I was just listening to the NewsHour. Kavanaugh, Bush’s nominee for the DC circuit, was just downgraded from well qualified to qualified by ABA. So the response? The ABA ratings are overblown. Anyone remember how the ABA rating was played up during the Alito nomination? I guess the lesson is: if you agree with me, that’s great, you’re great and if you disagree, then you don’t count.
Bush Intinerary Found Next to His Presidency… in the Garbage
I wonder if this has anything to do with the Murdoch’s new chumminess with Hillary. After all, Faux can’t spin on a dime and say she’s the best thing since sliced bread. No, they have to walk this back a little bit… “you know, we’ve been saying Hillary’s a bitch for years, but we’ve meant it as a compliment all that time, yeah — that’s the ticket — we need a bitch for President”.
Mary Cheney is a flat-out freak show. She says she is gay, but it is obvious that she has got a serious Oedipal think going on with her Daddy. About as creepy as it gets in a woman her age.
VG — I expressed my gratitude to your services upthread. But thanks again. I always appreciate it.
“If ya don’t pay by Friday, ya rat, the vig gets added to the principle…”
Valley Girl@25
I think this is not a typo
Vig could be short for “vigorish”, the slang for the usurious interests rates charged by loan sharks. Putting AT&T in the same category as loan sharks may be unfair to loan sharks, but them’s the breaks. (Dictionary says that “vigorish” derives from Ukranian or Russian.)
I often wonder what sort of calculation is behind these right-wing Hilary slamfests. It seems Podhoretz and Regnery are all poised to publish these anti-Hilary titles. I mean Hilary is just not appealing to a lot of progressives, including me. Gore, Feingold, yes. Hilary, no. So is this reverse psychology? They demonize her to make us stand behind a losing centrist proposition. Maybe Podhoretz and gang aren’t even that subtle and are scared that she’d win.
From my limited lexicon, vig is when you make a bet. You can win say 5 bucks; but if you lose, the house makes a percentage in the middle for handling the bet. If you lose, you PAY 6. The extra buck for the house is ‘vig’. Kinda like the builtin’ ‘gratuity’ on certain foodemporium tabs.
OT (and personal) –
So, I’ve been down in the dumps about not being able to go to Yearly Kos. REALLY down in the dumps. So much so that I almost can’t bear reading about the event. Well, big deal, that’s life. I’ll just suck it up.
And to HELP me suck it up, I’ve got happy happy news (for me). Our two new CD’s arrived to day: Neil Young’s “Living With War” & Bruce Springsteen’s “We Shall Overcome: The Seeger Collection.” As soon as Mr. K8 gets home with the goodies which arrived at the work address, woo hoo, happy feet!
Second happy bit of news: We just got tix to see Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young in July! Yippeee!!! Oh, happy, happy feet!
So, no more moping for me, nosirree!!! Still, I guess when Yearly Kos comes ’round, I’ll still be sad I can’t make it, but NEXT YEAR, right?!?
lorelynn 91 - when Tracey Ullman played a lesbian pro golfer on her old HBO show, the character was named Midge Dexter. Man, Tracey had the sharpest writers ever on that series.
Jane, oops, sorry I missed your previous comment.
Speaking of PILECRAP, here is the most disgusting thing I have hever seen, bar none. I recommend that you do NOT click through. Seriously.
http://poetry.rotten.com/weightlifter/
Jaysus, it’s like we are living in the Soviet Union. The WH has killed the DOJ inquiry into the NSA spying program.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/domestic_spying
IMHO opinion, this pundit’s boviating is not really an example of sexism, it is an eample of opportunistically using sexism as a political weapon. I think that Hillary is a candidate that the GOP fears. They must have polling data that show Hillary’s negatives are not so deep that they would prevent her from being a strong candidate. This stupid trash talk is just an attempt to make the very thought of Hillary Clinton unpleasant and icky -pave the way for the media CW for 2008. Pavlovian reactions take time to implant. It is an attempt to brand her. It is political social engineering. Like branding Kerry as an opportunistic untruthful weasel with no principles, and Gore as a juvenile teacher’s pet whose exaggerations turn into lies on a regular basis. If one of the supposedly leading candidates were a minority, or whatever, some kind of coded smear language would be found for that person as well.
For some reason, rather blatant, and if you think about it, rather silly and stupid, but still quite offensive, sexist language is more acceptable than racist language. They have carved out smear that Hilary will be feminazi bitch headcase and that is the smear that they are planting here, for further nurturing and tending over coming months.
It wouldnt’ work if it were not for US’s interesting problem with them uppity unfeminine women (silly little things keep insisting that they might have valuable opinions), and it would not be very effective, IF the US had something called an opposition party. And IF the US media did not also use sexsm to rake in big bucks.
Why do we not hear trenchant analyses of how any of the rightwingnut women deal with the grave dilemma of femininity vs. assertion? Oh! the Humanity! How do Coulter and Malkin put aside the femine virtues? And lo! What the cost!? Oh, heavens forfend, etc. bla bla bla.
FOX capitalizes on the sad but real fact that a large percentage of the body politic likes to hear fat, scholarly ‘experts’ say stupid, bigoted things. hey, this professor guy said it’s OK to hate gays, brown people, etc. must be true, it’s on TV. these people think WWF is real.
let’s counter barrage: republicans steal. republicans are crooks. FOX likes republicans. FOX is a crook. FOX wants to steal your bass boat, your Jeff Gordon jacket and your children. FOX wants to steal your children.
http://derenegade.blogspot.com.....-said.html
nuff said.
goin to bed.
nitey-nite
sleep tight
op99 106
That’s the end result of the asshat.
anon 107, that’s like something out of Catch 22. Jaysus, indeed.
uncle toby #94
We have a bitch for President. Just ask Cheney.
111 eeewwww.
Ah, Mrs. K8 (103), I am sad I have to wait for my Neil Young, because of the super-savings deal at Amazon.com. I ordered it along with Glen Greenwald’s book, etc. Waiting for publication? I guess.
Ah, PILECRAP. Reminded me of my term for the Supreme Court that’s being taken over by way of two stolen elections: Supreme Court Republicans of the Unelected Minority. SCROTUM.
So…what exactly is it that makes Hillary more of a bitch than Kay Bailey Hutchinson? Or Elizabeth Dole? Or that hideous crone from Ohio? Or Katherine Harris?
Poor Katherine Harris has started running ads here. They look like they were made her nephew Skippy using the AV equipment from Inbred Rich Fuc*tard Country Day School. She states that the big difference between her and Bill Nelson is that “I never give up and I never give in.” Then she makes a hideous smile-like grimace. It is truly awful. She’s running it like a mofo in the I-4 corridor.
108, wesgpc: “I think that Hillary is a candidate that the GOP fears. They must have polling data that show Hillary’s negatives are not so deep that they would prevent her from being a strong candidate.”
Hmmm. You know, maybe the “R” team is split right now…some think they’ll cream Hillary, some think she’ll win. Maybe they ran out this guy to say these things in order to poll on it…get the reaction from viewers, who are mostly “R” team folks.
Somehow, I still think alot of the “R” team wants Hillary to run….but you may be on to something!
Ghostman
Poolboy has a column about conservatives throwing Bush under the bus:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....02040.html
anon 107, they just can’t help themselves, can they? They will overstep, lie, take bribes, obfuscate and overstep some more until they just can’t keep up with all the little details of their obfuscation and lying and overstepping and the whole house of cards will come crashing down.
Man, if the Dems don’t stand up and yell about this little bit of Animal Farm wingnutterie…
This is the line: if Karl Rove can still be in possession of the highest level of security clearance in the land, then why isn’t it being granted to the NSA investigators?
&
Just what is this Adminstration trying to hide from Congress and the American people?
Jane, you need to see this:
http://bostonprogressive.blogs.....wrong.html
“As an indication on how difficult it is likely to be for a woman who needs EC to have access to it over-the-counter or find a doctor to give a written prescription in the 72 hours for best effectiveness, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is now advising women to get a preemptive prescription to the morning-after pill.
Get an advance prescription for emergency contraception so it will be on hand if you need it, the nation’s largest gynecologist group advised women Monday.
The new campaign aims to increase access to the morning-after pill following the Bush administration’s refusal to allow the emergency birth control to be sold over the counter nationwide.
“We want women to be prepared, well before a contraceptive failure or unprotected sex occurs. Afterward may be too late,” said Dr. Michael Mennuti, president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Something is very, very wrong.
posted by Craig R.
JPod’s mother’s day card:
Midge, because you “can stand tough and stand tall”, you’re my favorite bitch.
Yours,
The Son of a Bitch.
I am trying to sum it all up: Highly paid GOP strategists pay obnoxious and shameless guys like this to emit these kinds of mouthfarts as part of a conscious well researched political strategy. Some one long go decided this smear is the best way to brand old H.C. That simple. It is business. The sexism of it is not found in the psyche of this guy. He may be, probably is, sexist. Maybe we would be surprised and he aint very much. But he does understand he is being paid to spout this BS. If he knows H.C. personally and that she is not really as he portrays; and if he knows that the dilemma of the Tender Trap of Femininity vs. the Strength Necessary to Lead a Nation is pile of steaming hore crap; well, he is totally cool with spouting it anyway. It is how he pays the rent. His day gig, as it were.
Actually I think it is a perfectly legitimate kind of sleazy politcal warfare. Far more so than other things the reacionaries do.
Troubling sexism is in why this junk probably works in the US. And why Dems as party are not organized enough to realize that if it does work it is bad for party, regardless of what it does to Hillary’s campaign.