The past is not dead. In fact, it's not even past.
If you turn on your cable tonight, and you happen to have Turner Classic Movies, you'll be able to watch, for one of the first times in broadcast, D.W. Griffith's classic silent, The Birth of a Nation.
It's an instructive film, in part because Griffith introduced so many innovations that we now take for granted. One of these, of course, is the wealth of racial stereotypes that run throughout it.
It's also instructive that it's happening now, because there seems to be a fresh wave of thinking out there that sees this whole ugly racism thing now as a thing of the past. We can sift through its bones and quaintly examine them, tut-tutting the primitives of a century before, smug in our certainty that of course it lives no more.
One of these is Shelby Steele, who wants to argue that "white guilt" over the depredations of white supremacy keeps us whites from doing what we need to do in places like Iraq and on our southern border:
To maintain their legitimacy, they practice the minimalism that makes problems linger. What but minimalism is left when you are running from stigmatization as a "unilateralist cowboy"? And where is the will to truly regulate the southern border when those who ask for this are slimed as bigots? This is how white guilt defines what is possible in America. You go at a problem until you meet stigmatization, then you retreat into minimalism.Possibly white guilt's worst effect is that it does not permit whites--and nonwhites--to appreciate something extraordinary: the fact that whites in America, and even elsewhere in the West, have achieved a truly remarkable moral transformation. One is forbidden to speak thus, but it is simply true. There are no serious advocates of white supremacy in America today, because whites see this idea as morally repugnant. If there is still the odd white bigot out there surviving past his time, there are millions of whites who only feel goodwill toward minorities.
The notion that racism is dead has been a favorite theme of the right for awhile now. It began, probably, with the Thernstroms' America in Black and White, and continued with Dinesh D'Souza's The End of Racism. In a similar vein, the new White House Press Secretary, Tony Snow, suggested awhile back that he thinks racism a dead issue:
"Here's the unmentionable secret: Racism isn't that big a deal any more. No sensible person supports it. Nobody of importance preaches it. It's rapidly becoming an ugly memory."
-- Tony Snow, on an October 2003 edition of Fox News Sunday
What Snow is really doing, of course, is defining racism away. This is only true if "racism" is largely just the purview of the Ku Klux Klans and Silver Shirts, the David Dukes and Hal Turners and the National Socialist Movements of the world. It's also only true if you believe that the only racism of possible significance is that which might be condoned by public officials -- that racist acts by ordinary citizens are of no consequence.
The stark reality, however, is that racism not only continues to thrive in America both in less obvious, institutional ways, but also through the auspices of the conservative movement and its official wing, the Republican Party. The 21st-century American right has proven remarkably content not merely to let the embers of racism smolder away at the roots of our society, but to fan them in ways both subtle and unsubtle.
There is a long history of this: the long-running collaboration with neo-Confederates in the South, courtesy of the Southern Strategy and its transformative effects on the GOP, is only the best-known instance. The transmission of appeals from the far right in the 1990s, though less remarked upon, is certainly a piece of the picture.
Then there are the increasing numbers of overt white supremacists, clothed in seemingly normal personas, stepping up and running for public office as Republicans. The nice young man running for the Mosquito Control Board in Florida is also an avid member of the National Alliance. Out in Montana, another neo-Nazi announced his plans to run for the state Legislature.
And even though Republican officials there, appropriately, condemned the man's candidacy, it does little to drown out the consistent drumbeat we hear from conservative quarters these days. The more common refrain from rank and file conservatives, especially when it comes to the immigration debate, sounds a lot more like Michael Savage when he calls pro-immigrant marchers "vermin."
Let's take the most recent variant: the bizarre overreaction to the new Spanish-language version of "The Star Spangled Banner."
John Chuckman noted the weirdness of the reaction -- and the underlying cause:
"This is evoking spirited revulsion on the part of fair-minded Americans," offered John Teeley, representative of one of innumerable private propaganda mills in Washington commonly dignified as think-tanks. Mr. Teeley continued, "You are talking about something sacred and iconic in the American culture. Just as we wouldn't expect people to change the colors of the national flag, we wouldn't expect people to fundamentally change the anthem and rewrite it in a foreign language."A foreign language? There are roughly thirty-million Spanish speakers in the United States. The analysis here is interesting: an immigrant singing an anthem in his own language resembles someone changing the national flag. This argument does, perhaps unintentionally, reveal the real concern: Hispanics are changing our country, and we don't like it.
As No More Mister Nice Blog points out, there have been previous renditions of the "Star Spangled Banner" in German, French, Polish, and Tagalog. According to the Wikipedia entry on the song:
The Star-Spangled Banner was translated into Spanish in 1919 by the US Bureau of Education. It has also been translated into a number of other languages. In 1861, it was translated into German (and is also on that page in Latin). It has been translated into Yiddish by Jewish immigrants and into French by Acadians of Louisiana.It has also been translated into Samoan:
O Roketi mumu fa'aafi, o pomu ma fana ma aloi afi
E fa'amaonia i le po atoa, le fu'a o lo'o tu maninoa
Aue! ia tumau le fe'ilafi mai, ma agiagia pea
I eleele o Sa'olotoga, ma Nofoaga o le au totoa
The whole uproar reminds me a bit of the outrage that followed Jimi Hendrix's performance of the national anthem at Woodstock:
The creation of these effects was groundbreaking in its own right, far expanding the traditional techniques of the electric guitar. The rendition has been described by some as a generation's statement on the unrest in US society, and others as an anti-American mockery, oddly symbolic of the beauty, spontaneity, and tragedy that was endemic to Hendrix's life. It was an unforgettable rendition remembered by generations. When asked on the Dick Cavett Show if he was aware of all the outrage he had caused by the performance, Hendrix replied: 'I thought it was beautiful.'
Jimi was so cool.
Unfortunately, the harpies of the nativist right are not.
You see, to them, it doesn't matter that there have been other renditions of the National Anthem in other languages. For them, it's the same thing as those dirty Mexicans who were waving Mexican flags: they polluting our culture. They're taking away our lily-white, English-speaking past and replacing it with a multilingual, multiracial present.
Some of this is plain old ignorant provincialism. Americans are the only people I know who are positively insulted when someone tries to speak to them in another language. And some of it, frankly, is latent white supremacism: the belief that "traditional" white culture is innately superior, and any dilution of it is a bad thing.
The overarching narrative, though, is fairly clear: Latinos are the problem, and they should be sent back to Mexico.
The reality is that much of the demographic change fueling this anger is occurring in places that, previously, have been homogeneous white communities: rural and suburban communities in the West and Midwest and South. The kinds of places where, only fifty years ago, it was not uncommon to encounter signs on the city borders reading: "Nigger, Don't Let the Sun Set on You Here."
These signs were particularly common in the Midwest, but also could be found out West and in the East as well. They were less common in the South, which dealt with its black population differently, through Jim Crow laws and segregation; the rest of the country simply ran blacks out of their communities and forced them into urban black neighborhoods. As James Loewen documents in his book Sundown Towns [more about which I'll soon be writing] the direct effects of these policies have given us a legacy of racial separation that is still with us. And most of these privileged white communities, despite the changes in modern racial sensibilities, still continue to resist any demographic change.
One of the ways this resistance manifests itself is in the form of hate crimes, which as I've explained previously, are known to occur not in correlation with economic downturns, but rather with dramatic demographic shifts. (I go into this in some detail in Death on the Fourth of July.) Particularly in formerly homogeneous communities facing an influx of easily identifiable Others.
So it should not surprise us that, as the ADL recently reported, the levels of threats and actual violence directed against Latinos is rapidly rising in these precincts around the country. A sampling:
January 2006, California. Ryan Nicholas Newsome, a member of the Another Order white supremacist gang, pleaded no contest on January 20, 2006, to assault charges in Yuba County. He pleaded no contest to assault with force likely to cause great bodily injury with a criminal street gang enhancement as a result of an August 2005 incident, in which he and an associate allegedly assaulted a Hispanic man.December 2005, Tennessee. A Blount County judge on December 1, 2005, sentenced Jacob Allen Reynolds and Thomas Matthew Lovett to four years in prison and six months in prison (and two and a half on probation) respectively after they pleaded guilty to vandalizing a Mexican food store in Maryville on May 7, 2005, causing over $17,000 in damages. The men allegedly broke windows and a refrigerator, vandalized a car, and spray-painted Nazi symbols on the store. Three others charged still await trial.
November 2005, Texas. Christopher Chubasco Wilkins, a prison escapee, was recaptured on November 5 and charged with murdering three men in the Fort Worth area during his month-long escape. Wilkins, who is according to police a self-proclaimed white separatist heavily tattooed with a variety of white supremacist tattoos, including a portrait of Adolf Hitler, is alleged to have killed two Hispanic men and one African-American man by gunshots to the head. Police are examining a possible racial motive. Wilkins had been living at a halfway house in Houston, after being released from federal prison, and left the house without permission.
November 2005, Tennessee. A federal judge sentenced former Klansman Daniel James Schertz to 14 years in prison for selling pipe bombs to a person he thought would use them to kill Mexican and Haitian immigrants. The person turned out to be an undercover informant. Schertz, a former corrections officer and member of the North Georgia White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, pleaded guilty to making five pipe bombs to be used to blow up a bus carrying Mexican workers. Later, Schertz expressed gratitude that the government had stopped him, but said, "We should have people here who know how to speak English. They are over here illegally and nothing gets done to them."
October 2005, California. A Sacramento man and two other suspects who allegedly attacked and injured six people in a hate-crime spree at two local parties were arrested in the early morning of October 16, 2005. Ryan Marino, 22, posted bail from El Dorado County Jail later Sunday after being charged on four counts of assault with a deadly weapon with an extenuating circumstance of a hate crime. He allegedly used brass knuckles after shouting epithets against Hispanics and proclaiming "white pride" at a home Sunday evening. Party attendees later identified Marino, who police said crashed the parties with the intent of "beating up Mexicans."
September 2005, Utah. A federal judge on September 27, 2005, sentenced Lance Vanderstappen to 20 years in prison for trying to kill a Hispanic man while in a holding cell in July 2005 awaiting sentencing for a racketeering charge. The victim had stab wounds to his neck, throat and chest. In court, Vanderstappen, a member of the notorious Soldiers of Aryan Culture white supremacist prison gang, admitted that he targeted the victim because he was Hispanic, saying "I intentionally tried to kill him." Vanderstappen pleaded guilty to attempted murder.
September 2005, New Jersey. Joseph Schmidt of Little Egg Harbor received a sentence of three years' probation in September 2005 after pleading guilty in June to two counts of bias intimidation, two counts of aggravated assault, two counts of criminal mischief, two counts of possessing weapons for an unlawful purpose, and simple assault. The charges were related to a string of attacks on minorities, primarily Hispanics, in Ocean County in 2003. Schmidt, a member of the white supremacist skinhead group East Coast Hate Crew, received a light sentence because he had cooperated with authorities in prosecuting other members of the group. Three others involved in the incident pleaded guilty and one was acquitted. Others have yet to go to trial.
July 2005, California. Four people, three men and one woman, were arrested in Riverside, California, on July 11-12, 2005, charged with making terrorist threats with a hate crime enhancement. Some of the people arrested had "white pride" tattoos, according to authorities, who also seized a variety of white supremacist items. According to police, the suspects drove to a home and challenged several Hispanics there to a fight, threatening them and using racial slurs. A similar episode occurred the next night. According to police, the people arrested claimed no particular group affiliation but said they were proud to be "members of the Aryan race."
May 2005, Arizona. White supremacist Steve Boggs was sentenced to death on May 13, 2005, for murdering three fast-food workers in Mesa, Arizona, in 2002 during a robbery. He had been convicted of three counts of first-degree murder and various robbery, burglary and kidnapping charges. Boggs shot the victims, a Native American and two Hispanics, then stuffed their bodies into a freezer at the store. Boggs wrote to a Mesa police detective that he had wanted to "rid the world of a few needless illegals. I don't feel sorry." Another defendant still awaits trial. According to prosecutors, the two men were members of a small hate group they called the Imperial Royal Guard.
May 2005, Texas. Two racist skinheads pleaded guilty on May 5, 2005, to a racially motivated beating of a Hispanic man in January 2003. Douglas Brannan of Hockley and Mark Fletcher Smith of Spring, both sporting many white supremacist tattoos, were convicted of civil rights violations. The two men, and a teenager, had attacked a Hispanic customer at a gas station, beating him and kicking him with steel-toed boots until he was unconscious while shouting "border jumper," "spic," and "we kill people like you." Brannan received a five year sentence and Smith a three year sentence.
December 2004, California. Ten racist skinheads from Redlands and Riverside attacked three Hispanics in the parking lot of a topless bar on December 29, 2004. According to police, they assaulted the men while yelling racial slurs at them and identifying themselves as members of skinhead groups. No arrests have yet been made.
November 2004, Wisconsin. Mark Lentz of Sheldon, Wisconsin, received a three-month sentence and two years of probation, as well as 40 hours of community service, after pleading no contest to a misdemeanor hate crime. Lentz was the last of four racist skinheads to be sentenced for luring a Hispanic man outside a bar in Waukesha, then hitting him on the head with a bottle and repeatedly kicking him. Mark Davis II of Watertown earlier received a 3 � year sentence and two years of extended supervision, Kasey Bieri received an 18-month jail term and three years of probation, and Jeffrey Gerloski received four months in jail and two years probation.
June 2004, Texas. Ranch Rescue member Casey Nethercott was convicted by a Texas jury of felony firearm possession in connection with an attack on two illegal immigrants from El Salvador outside of Hebbronville, Texas, in 2003. He was sentenced to five years in prison. The two immigrants (now in the U.S. legally) successfully sued Nethercott and others involved in the incident for a total judgment of $1,450,000.
November 2003, Idaho. Aryan Nations member Zachary Beck was arrested for felony malicious harassment as a hate crime for attacking a Hispanic male in the parking lot of a supermarket after asking if the victim was Mexican. While awaiting trial on that charge, he was later re-arrested after allegedly shooting at a police officer in Longview, Washington, during a standoff. He still awaits trial on the alleged crimes.
June 2003, California. Two racist skinheads, Waylon Kennell and James Grlicky, were convicted in separate trials for the brutal beating of a Mexican migrant worker in San Diego in the fall of 2003. Grlicky was convicted of attempted murder, conspiracy, robbery, assault and battery, with a hate crime enhancement. Kennell was convicted of assault causing great bodily injury and battery with serious bodily injury. According to the prosecutor in the case, the two went hunting for a "beaner" to beat and rob. They kicked the victim in the head around a dozen times, including "curbstomping" him�kicking down on the back of the head when the victim's open mouth is placed against a concrete curb (emulating a scene in the movie "American History X"). The victim suffered brain damage as a result of the attack.
May 2003, New Hampshire. Aryan Nations member Russell Seace, Jr., of Hampton Beach, pleaded guilty on May 27 to being a felon in possession of a firearm as part of a plea bargain with the federal government. In exchange for money, Seace had agreed to kill a Hispanic inmate after he was released, in retaliation for an alleged attack by the Hispanic man on a white prison inmate.
February 2003, Oregon. A Mexican landscaper in Beaverton was beaten with a baseball bat, robbed, and told to "go back home," by a man with a shaved head and a coat with "KKK" on it. Baseball bats are one of the weapons preferred by racist skinheads. Authorities posted a reward but were unable to make an arrest in the crime.
The most recent, and horrifying, such case occurred recently in Texas, where two shaved-headed young men with a history of racial epithets and brawling attacked a 16-year-old Hispanic youth, sodomized him with a broomstick, carved him with a knife, poured bleach over him, and left him near death. (Somewhat predictably, prosecutors are declining to file hate-crime charges at this time.)
And, as the San Francisco Chronicle recently reported, there has been a regular onslaught of racist, clearly white supremacist ugliness floating around the anti-immigration forces recently, almost certainly whipped up by the pro-immigrant marches. This includes death threats against public officials.
There's no reason to be surprised by this, though. Anyone watching the anti-immigration agitation carefully -- particularly the semi-official celebration of violent viglantism known as the Minutemen -- can hear for themselves the old embers of racial hate crackling back to life.
So while Minuteman founder Chris Simcox works steadily to deny the presence of any kind of white-supremacist element in his ranks, you can hear one of his early fellow border patrollers expounding:
No, we ought to be able to shoot the Mexicans on sight, and that would end the problem. After two or three Mexicans are shot, they'll stop crossing the border and they'll take their cows home, too.
At an anti-immgrant rally in Tennessee four days before the marches, this proposal drew applause:
On Apr. 27 -- four days before a mass movement that includes undocumented workers, legal immigrants and U.S. citizens refused to go to work or school in observation of the "Great American Boycott" -- more than 1,000 people attended an anti-immigrant meeting called "Demagnetise America" in Franklin, Tennessee.Those in attendance heard Nashville radio talk show host Phil Valentine say that he thought that U.S. Border Patrol Agents should consider shooting undocumented immigrants as they come across the border.
According to the news story posted at the website of the Centre for New Community's Building Democracy Initiative, Susan Tully, the national field director for the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) -- present at the event -- "chuckled at the idea, while the large crowd erupted into applause".
At the immigration marches themselves, pro-Minuteman agitators showed up and shouted racial hatred:
The Minutemen were doing their best to incite the Mexican protesters to violence, with shouts of "you motherfuckers" (from the black woman pictured above) and "go home, Mexicans", not to mention the skinny guy (pictured above, middle finger extended) who kept flipping them off and grabbing his crotch (really!). There were several people who did a wonderful job keeping the marchers away from the line of cops and the Minutemen, telling them that there was no need to sink to that level and that "we're better than that". There was never a point where I thought violence was imminent, to the credit of the police and the rally organizers.
You see, everyone knows that being a racist is bad. That's why no one ever admits to being a racist, even when they're rather nakedly so.
But that doesn't mean that people actually stop being racist. It just means that it goes on under the surface, when people think they aren't looking.
So the Minutemen loudly proclaim that they're weeding out any white supremacists and neo-Nazis. But then former organizers come forward and tell quite a different tale:
Neo-Nazis volunteered for Jim Gilchrist's recent congressional campaign and distributed racist propaganda at Gilchrist rallies with the full knowledge of the Minuteman Project co-founder and his campaign managers, according to a former Gilchrist campaign volunteer whose account is supported by photographs, video footage and postings on the white supremacist Web site Stormfront."They were basically allowing Skinheads and white nationalists to work the phone banks and do IT [computer work] and distribute National Alliance fliers targeting non-whites," Cliff May, a dance instructor in Orange County, Calif., told the Intelligence Report. "When I told Mary [Gilchrist's finance manager] and Eldon [Gilchrist's grassroots coordinator] that I didn't want to work for a campaign that was tainted by white supremacy in any way, they told me not to cause a stir.
"When I kept bringing it up, they kicked me out."
Photographs taken at an Oct. 29 Gilchrist rally in Sacramento show a man outfitted like a Nazi Skinhead distributing propaganda from the neo-Nazi National Alliance. "I talked with Gilchrist about it and he said they'd decided to, in his words, 'let it go,'" May said. Three weeks later, May says he spotted two neo-Nazis among a crowd of Gilchrist campaign volunteers at a City Council meeting in Lake Forest, Calif. May recognized the young man and woman from photographs of neo-Nazis giving seig-heil salutes in front of swastika banners at an anti-immigration protest in Laguna Beach four months earlier, in July. May said he videotaped the neo-Nazis at the November meeting in Lake Forest and immediately afterward played the footage on a big screen television at Gilchrist's campaign headquarters.
"I identified the couple on the tape as white supremacists and started asking everyone if they'd actually been working the office, and the front desk person and other volunteers said they had," said May. "Gilchrist was there and stated that he didn't want to deal with it and he left." May said he later learned from Gilchrist's campaign managers that some neo-Nazis were told they could work for the campaign as long as they kept their ideology quiet. "Gilchrist had assured the media several times he had a zero tolerance policy toward white supremacists. But from what I saw from the inside, it was more like, 'Don't ask, don't tell,'" May said.
At Thursday night's hearing where Simcox spoke, the Minutemen were treated to a long series of harangues against them, including some that entered the realm of inaccurate hyperbole.
But the real prize came from Simcox:
Also, I take great pride in being part of the Civil Rights Movement -- Martin Luther King. And of course I admire the original border Minuteman, Cesar Chavez, who warned us about illegal immigration 25 years ago and actually marched to the border to protest illegal immigration and predicted the problems we have today.
It's factually true, but distorted; Chavez would never have condoned an operation so clearly aimed at demonizing Latinos as the Minutemen. Nonetheless, some of the Minutemen's supporters sounded similar notes. One in particular chastised the crowd for exhibiting its "prejudice" against the Minutemen, and wondered aloud, at numerous points, "What would Martin Luther King say?"
Human Rights commissioner Ellis Casson, a Seattle pastor who actually knew King, piped up at the end in response.
"I knew Dr. King," he said. "I know what he would say:
"'Here we go again.'"
Yes indeedy.

[Hat tip to Gene Lyons for the Steele piece.]
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight
whoo- boy, gotta go back and read, but
FITZ!!!
Fitz!
Thanks in advance, Mr. Neiwert.
Ask BobbyG about racism:
http://www.bgladd.com/my_girls.jpg
quite the post - much to digest. thanks.
OT– I hate to repost, but Leslie gave us the heads up that the replay of the Bolton hearing today is on CSPAN 1 right now and he gets flamed on Niger– worth watching.
early descent into silliness, entirely inappropriate in the context of the seriousness of the post’s subject matter, but what the heck, it’s Late Nite:
angie 67 (previous thread)
Shez, thank you– you just made me dance with my kitty more and more much to my joy and probably his chagrin…
your chat must be happy if he grins
Thanks so much, David.
The deeply racist impulses being fueled on the right over immigration are very frightening. They try to appropriate the language, imagery and legacy of people like Chavez and MLK just as you say, and then point to this and pompously claim how very egalitarian and color blind they are (witness the Red State racists and Ben Domenech) as cover for the dangerous stuff they are espousing.
Then they go into their victim act and whine about how oppressed they’ve been by “white guilt.” It’s a truly disgusting spectacle and thank you so much for being willing to take it on.
David Neiwert ! you are blogosheric - everywhere I’ve been tonight, folks have been awaiting your weigh in on this - and here you are right here - THANK YOU JANE !
rip it big guy, rip it - I’m going back for seconds - Thank you
There’s no place like home . . .
In Memphis, Tennessee, in 1965, when SNCC and SCLC were just beginning to test the Civil Rights Act in local restaurants, I saw a sign on a laundromat wall: “maids in uniform only.”
The fundamental viciousness of that sign, cloaked as it was in a veneer of white southern gentility, has haunted me ever since. To this day, I hate and despise all forms of racism, especially the sugar-coated, cowardly versions.
Now, kracker kids, you know in your little lily white hearts that Jesus wasn’t Aryan …Don’t you?
This looks like an argument whereby the tail wags the dog. Before you can make the conclusions offered by Steele, it seems you need to analyze each war.
If one does an analysis of the wars (take Vietnam and Iraq as examples) the problem doesn’t originate in white guilt…it originates in the lack of any consensus measure of the legitimacy for conducting said wars.
Steele’s analysis is an insult to the American public, offered to bolster the misguided decisions of a select few…all the while undressed and exposed by the majority of the citizenry for what it actually is…a mistake. Therefore, the analysis is quite simple…Americans aren’t inclined to support mistakes.
more observations here:
www.thoughttheater.com
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....05_pf.html
Immigrant Backlash In Herndon
Voters Oust Leaders Who Supported Center
darkblack says:
May 2nd, 2006 at 9:04 pm
Now, kracker kids, you know in your little lily white hearts that Jesus wasn’t Aryan …Don’t you?
_____
Neither was he Jewish. He was a “Christian.”
chatgrin, heh– you are a master, punaise.
Me, I am a meer mistress of my kat.
Thank goodness I found the new thread again.
Wave the bloody red shirt of Martin Luther King.
In answer to the rhetorical question of when will you noisy civil righters ever be satisfied King thundered out a lightening string of never’s - NEVER so long as police brutality, disenfranchisement, housing and lodging discrimination, ghettoization and routine attacks on black self esteem exist and spread. NEVER, he shouted quoting the prophet Amos till…”Justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream…”
” Should unjust conditions for anarchists prevail the call for them to be non-violent is a demand for them to submit to injustice. Nothing in the theory of non-violence counsels this suicidal course.”
King on non-violence and it’s inextricable link with justice.( he may have mentioned Negro’s there, not anarchists; my bad.)
Martin Luther King jnr also described ” AGGRESSIVE non-violence, MASSIVE non-violence and non-violent SABOTAGE ” this post 67 King also spoke of the new campaigns ” DISRUPTIVE DIMENSIONS.”
Only such campaigns would be “POWERFUL” and “DRAMATIC” enough to bring essential change.
” Non-violence must be adapted to urban conditions and urban moods. Non-violent protest must now mature to a new level, to correspond to heightened black impatience and stiffened white resistance. This high level is MASS CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE. There must be more than a statement to the larger society, there must be a force that interrupts its functioning at some key point…to dislocate the functioning of a city without destroying it can be more effective than a riot because it can be longer lasting, costly to the larger society, but not wantonly destructive. It is a device of of social action that is more difficult for a government to quell by superior force…it is militant and defiant not destructive.”
Round this time MLK also said he wanted to “go for broke”, was willing to accept longer jail time and said…” In a sense you could say we were engaged in the class struggle,” and also called for …” a redistribution of economic power. We are now making demands that will cost the nation something…you are messing with folk then. Your messing with the captains of industry…and this all means that we’re in dangerous waters because it really means that we’re saying something’s wrong with capitalism…there must be a better distribution of wealth and maybe America must move toward a democratic socialism.”
Do you want to know more?
Search on ‘ Anarchism and the Black revolution’
because power concede’s nothing without the demand - it never has and it never will.
cbl — David Neiwert is awesome.
Indeed, BobbyG…He was one of the good goys.
;>)
sorry, Punaise
is stephen colbert writing shelby steele’s material for him?
just askin’ …
The contemporary Republican party thrives on racism. Racism is the animating emotion of its base. Racism gives Republicans the solid South. The nice clean oligarchs don’t share the personal sentiments of the racists, but they love them — they use them to maintain their power.
David Neiwert keeps us up on how the hard right more and more infiltrates the mainstream and his description is true. But this could not happen if one of the two poltical parties had not chosen to embrace racism as a strategy to win and maintain power.
As long as we allow this, America is morally foul.
It feels like you are saying that if you are against illegal immigration you are racist.
You point out several violent acts, and the latent underlying racist trend on the side of those who think this is an issue. But you do not seem to acknowledge the same tendencies on the side of the immigration movement. Are you suggesting that whites are the only group which has violent tendencies?
It also seems like you are not acknowledging that racism is a two way street. For example, my wife teaches in the Los Angeles area and has a very large percentage of hispanic students who openly admit that they HATE white people.
Racism is a problem that ALL people have to deal with, as it can come from many different places.
Immigration has placed many people, especially here in southern california and perhaps in AZ and TX, at odds to each other. Middle class white Americans view immigration as a threat. And immigrants view Middle class white Americans as a barrier to their percieved liberties. I have heard ignorant things from both sides. But to take the side of one at the expense of the other does not help the situation.
Wow, what a powerful read! Geez did that need saying. Thank you!!!!
Who pays these losers to talk. We have nothing better to worry about (according to this person you mention) than white guilt, and who invented what?
People are different colors…get over it.
I would pray that “white guilt” over slavery and atomic bombs and stockpiling 10’s (100’s?) of thousands of nukes with our buddies USSR might keep us from this manifest destiny propaganda for a while longer.
Ignorant intellect.
And illegal immigration is just one small thing in this guys comments - it sounds like a wedge for a fear & pride combo ticket.
Well, what do you know. What serendipity!
I was just talking up the TCM series (Tuesday and Thursday evenings all throughout the whole month of May) in the thread below, and here is one of my very favorite people in the world, Mr. Neiwert, mentioning it as an intro to his FDL piece.
I’ll be back here later tonight to scarf down every single one of David’s words a bit later, along with all the great comments, but for now I’m going back to the TCM series.
They’re currently in the middle of the 1927 version of “Uncle Tom’s Cabin.” I just had to pop back over to the ‘puter to see what was up with the mysterious disappearing and reappearing new thread.
I’m so happy to see who our guest poster is, because as I said here just yesterday, David Neiwert is unique in what he does, priceless. No one else covers the racist/fascist threat to this nation in such detail and with such insight as he does.
Now it’s back to the evil Simon Legree and the long-suffering Eliza.
The Republicans in Power lust for the 1950’s. They want women at home in pearls and apron waiting for the man to come home and make the important decisions. They want the brownskinned people to “know their place”, a subserviant place, doing all the hard work that is too beneath them and their ilk to dirty their hands doing.
They want pure little daughters who want to be just like mom when they grow up. They want power over other people’s lives but insist they are above the law.
They want their Cold War back. They want a scared populace doing duck and cover at their beck and call. It is all about power, power over others makes them feel better about themselves.
Power and control. Racism is just one way they operate.
No Irish Need Apply —
Read Mark Twain’s Roughing It —
Racism is the antagonism of one tribe against another; different skin color is not required.
Don’t know if this has been mentioned on another thread, but if not –
Go check out the WaPo op-ed “My Guantanamo Diary” by Mahvish Khan, a law student at U of Miami who’s been to Gitmo as a translator nine times;
and then you can hand it to yr favorite neighborhood racist and dare them to deny the folks that are imprisoned there deserve, as Khan says, less rights than the iguanas at Gitmo, which are protected by the Endangered Species Act.
Why do Republicans hate Hispanics?
If they want to give us all the Latino voters, they can keep all the skinheads. I’m down with that trade. I’ll take the growing demographic over the shrinking one.
I think the Republican leadership is very, very scared the base won’t turn out in November. That’s why they’re cranking up the Brown People Fear Machine. It’s really a stupid, short sighted move, politically, as well as morally bad. Heckuva job, guys!
YOu’re my codliver oil David. I know you are good for me, but I flinch.
Today, at a stoplight, I was behind a truck that had a faded flag decal and right after that the words: “It’s a WHITE thing, you wouldn’t understand it”
I’m 5′2″ blonde and today was driving a truck (driverside window down). The shaved head (so are my nephews, so that doesn’t really bother me) 20something looked in his rearview and grinned at me. I’m pretty nonconfrontational, but his grin provoked me to take my thumb and turn it down. The anger in his face, spitting out the window, gunning his motor - it was as if his mother disowned him. So much anger, just awaiting a trigger.
Racism wins in Herndon, Virginia:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....01805.html
darkblack 18
…one of the good goys…
where’d jew hear that?
Woodrow Wilson was a Princeton academic and Governor of New Jersey before he was elected President — but he was a Georgia Southerner before he went North.
Woodrow Wilson thoroughly enjoyed Birth of a Nation, and endorsed it’s overt racism. It was this failure of character that betrayed and destroyed the first Progressive Movement in America.
When Franklin Roosevelt was elected President, he called himself a Liberal — because the word progressive had fallen into disgrace.
Sound familiar?
In the Spring of 1945, LIFE magazine ran a story on their editorial page that began, I’m a Liberal too, but . . . — the point being, Conservative had been turned into a dirty word, by FDR and the New Deal Era.
Sound Familiar?
Where do you think the modern GOP Reactionaries got their playbook?
As usual, I’ve been listening to the BBC in the background as I read here, and earlier I heard a comment that I found painful. I am sorry I don’t know where it came from, but the gist was that illegal immigrants are taking jobs that unemployed blacks should have.
I haven’t completed all the links, but your commentary is, as always, powerful. The immigration issue is complex, but rhetoric like I heard tonight and when I linked to one or two of the sites simply fuels the fire of hate. I have concerns now about the increased involvement of the US in the Darfur issue. I believe it is long overdue and crucial and that our country should be ashamed of neglecting our moral responsibility. But I wonder what these hate groups will do with it in communities where refugees from Nigeria and the Sudan have emigrated and settled. Shame, shame, shame.
ck
right now, it looks like the Republican’s are using the Goebbels play book…when they use a play book at all, and aren’t just making crazy-ass shit up.
Faulkner did not write “in fact.”
Faulkner didn’t have a blog, either. Loser.
Mary, beautifully stated.
and
Pachacutec, I didn’t know about that, how terrible. How deeply ironic that the guy who won is a health club person, huge donation to the common good. Where will he get his healthy veggies if the migrants leave?
Punaise:
Ask BobbyG…I thought he brewed it up.
;>)
If illegal aliens break the law and feel they are entitled to citizenship, then they are showing by example how life should be in the United States.
Likewise, I should be able to sit across from your six year old daughter in a restaurant, lay out a line of coke on the table and snort away. Or, pull out a needle and shoot up heroin.
We simply quit enforcing laws and bless those who break them. Or, are you trying to rationalize that some instances are justified while others are not?
rocksaw-
Racism really only has meaning when it is perpetrated by the race in power. Eliminate that, and the hatred that your wife speaks of will disappear, magically.
rcauthen– read it the day it was published. thank you for linking to it tonite. I have hated this part of us for a long time and will for a long time to come, I will fight this and kick myself silly everyday until we rectify this…if we ever can.
Racism is alive and well here and the many have jumped on board…
But our country– both dem and rethug– is participating in the worst example imaginable. Forget for a minute our revered founding fathers, what about our true beliefs? What about our parents, our grandparents, our great- grandparents, our ancestors and every thing we’ve been taught? Was it hatred or tolerance?
God. Yahweh. Buddha. The Goddess, etc. Did any Deity exhort us to hate or kill or even fear one another. No. It is a human instinct and a human act. Other animals kill to simply survive. We now kill to reign, not to coexist. We kill to dominate and subdue. I have never heard of a herd of animals killing wantonly and indiscriminately (including a feeding frenzy by sharks) that was not meant to satisfy simple hunger. Yet, supreme humans quite often slaughter the weak in order to claim superiority.
I have never owned, shot, or wanted a gun and yet I would do all of that and more to protect my loved ones and my country… it is why I understand the compulsion that occupied and war ravaged people fight back. THAT to me is the only just war.
National security can only be preserved by nurturing our humanity.
G’nite, friends. Sorry for the ranty purge.
put away the spoon.
do not feed.
37 CLETER
No snark intended. Just that the source for the quote is wrong. For a place that struggles to get facts right, right Jane?, better be consistent.
Why do Republicans hate Hispanics?
If they want to give us all the Latino voters, they can keep all the skinheads.
Courting the Latino Vote was key to Karl Rove’s strategy for a permanent GOP majority — and he was that close to pulling it off.
http://www.coronadoproject.com.....amp;p=memo
Over the last three election cycles, the Democratic Party has lost 28 percent of market share among Hispanic voters. This lost share represents crucial winning margins in states like Iowa, New Mexico, Nevada and Colorado — all states that could have helped John Kerry become President.
But all of that has been thrown away — mute testimony to how desperate it has become in the BushCo bunker.
That they would court the racist vote instead of Latinos, means they are scraping the maggots off of the bottom of the BushCo barrel. There is no future for this den of thieves — surviving November is their only goal . . .
One more thing, a survey released today reveals how little we, as a young nation, have progressed:
>>>>>>
The US may be the world’s only true superpower but global domination does not equal global knowledge. A new survey shows young Americans have what can only be described as shoddy geography skills, with six out of 10 unable to locate Iraq on a map and almost half incapable of pointing to the state of Mississippi.
Traditionally, the US has bowed to the idea of isolationism, hoping that geography in the form of vast oceans can help act as a protection from other nations. But the survey suggests that such an attitude- both culturally and in terms of interest in overseas travel - is having a woeful impact on Americans’ ability to learn about the wider world.
>>>>>
http://news.independent.co.uk/.....361584.ece
The cspan rebroadcast ended a while ago. i’ve been catching up since then. and it is time to go to bed.
angie, thanks again for the original reference to the Bolton hearing. the 2nd part was not shown, but the first half was worth every minute.
BobbyG, my heartfelt sympathies. I took time out to visit your site tonight. I hope you and your ladylove have a good reunion. wishes for peace and happiness.
‘nite all.
g’nite Leslie, g’nite all.
i’m not sure what i’m going to say here but i feel like i’m going to, maybe, at least seem like a devil’s advocate. i don’t believe that racism is dead. in the u.s., or in any other country for that matter. sometimes it’s the result of wars or violence (koreans are still angry at the japanese), sometimes it’s differences of religion and/or class (the northern sudanese find the southern sudanese inferior). sometimes it’s a matter of the color of one’s skin, or facial features. it is difficult to parse the rejection alterity prompts. and sometimes it’s all wrapped up in tradition. and all of the above relate in some way to identity and territory.
when i came back to the u.s. after being away for ten years at the end of august 2001, i had just gotten settled in when the lid blew off. a few weeks after 9/11 i began to see all of this really disgusting language regarding arabs and muslims in general. it was shocking to me and i call the perpetrators racist. when i called them on it i was castigated, indignantly, for using the word racist. it was as though the word was passe. it’s meaning had been drained. it was an empty shell, or so they were attempting to bully me into believing.
we progressives, liberals, or leftists should, however, reconsider the idea of tradition. we should embrace tradition as something to continue to value and respect. it is part of our identity as well, not simply the consolation of “conservatives”. i, too, love jimi hendrix’s version of the national anthem. but i also understand the preference that many people have for the “old fashioned” arrangement. part of the reason we have become so fragmented as a nation is loss of things that were traditional and have been lost. there are americans who are good people who have been alienated from progressive ideas as a result of these broken traditions. we have lost them and in the process we have lost elections and the possibility to lead the country in a better direction.
There was something this week on the local news about Chris Simcox in Arizona about his accounting practices, not being a non-profit and where is ALL that money going. I cannot find anything on a short search but the jist of the story is compaints from donors & the guys who are down on the border. They want to know where those $10,000 checks are going because these guys are down there on their own, no port-a-potties, food or any supplys. It is bring ALL your own if you are going to be a boarder watcher.
Some of the old codgers being interviewed look like your clasic hate anyone of color and they were really sour on the Mintuemen with how poorly they are being treated. Stating they have seen large checks being passed to Simcox.
One of the local stations did interview Simcox about the donations, lots of song & dance not to give real answers. But he did state he has recieved approx 150,000 individual donations and finally said he has recieved around $250,000 which made the reporter really astounded saying that there that many people donating $2.00 checks….
There was also investigation into if Simcox had done any IRS filing for his group and if the donors are telling the truth, that checks in the thousands were given to him, he is just getting rich off of HATE!
As the mother of two non-white children this issue is upfront and personal. If they first come for the Mexicans (approprate term here in AZ) then next they will be after the asians …. which will be my kids next…. If they pass laws to deny birthright citizenship to the children of immigrants, that means my own grandchildren would be denied their American Citizenship even though my kids are naturalized. YOU just do not know how far these racist ReThugs will go.
I have often thought the young supremisist movement in the U.S. has an erie silence over the past few years, at least in the media. My guess is large percentages are in the armed services and will someday come home ready to spread newly acquired skills. What we all spend the most of our public resources on. Who in our land would want a paid invitation to learn the tactics of armed war more? Just guessing.
This country has come a long way, yet we are still only just begining to heal and learn from the civil rights movement. Ignoring our history and present situation as this story points out so well, along with our wars, ignoring Darfur, Katrina denial, gated communities, to name a few giant examples.
Thank you for maintaining an eye on this important issue, ignoring hatred will not make it go away.
rcauthen28 - thanks for the link. I’m getting to disheartened to stay awake and keep the wheels spinning. Here’s hoping for dreamless sleep.
Racism is Tribalism — the weak and fearful retreat into their tribal group, and throw stones and outsiders.
The secure and self confident have the strength of character to see beyond tribal differences.
The shock of 9/11 tipped the balance of American character from self confidence to fear; Bush/Rove seized the opportunity, and we will pay the price for decades to come.
throw stones at outsiders; not and –
good for you, angie.
I may be alone on this thread, going to bed in a minute, but I think that in the light of what we read here tonight and in r.cauthen’s link, in the tribal killings in Iraq and in Darfur, the choice becomes ever more clear. We can’t allow our country and our Constitution to continue on this path of insatiable power for power’s sake. When the Bill of Rights was so carefully crafted, when the government was in its infancy, the dreams for this nation were for peace and equality, for prosperity and justice for all people. I look at my country with a growing sense of shame and sorrow. All of our divisions are manmade and sustained by hate and fear. When did America become anyone’s personal property? Remember when you were little and were in school saying the “Pledge of Allegiance”? Did you ever just feel really proud? Did you ever have a little flutter in your heart? I did. More than a few times. America was so much more than a thing to be had; it was an idea, a notion of the way things could be; it was leaders and neighbors and good. It was the American Dream.
One of the differences I see between myself and the Republicans is that when I disagree with something I read or see from them, I don’t seem to have a knee-jerk reaction to point a finger and scream, Traitor. When did one party become more American than the other? Why is my opinion less valuable because it is different? I read so often on townhall or redstate that liberals are “crazy” or “stupid” or “ignorant”, but if that person needed my very specialized care, would it matter? Would I be ignorant then?
I don’t think that the majority of us at firedoglake are as interested in being perjorative or ugly as we are in moving our country forward in a way that can be safe and fair for everyone, where compassion is as important as power and where the least of us is as honored as the greatest. When we are verbally derisive, I always feel a little let down, but I know it comes from a place of deep and long-harbored frustration, not a place of real hate. When I visit redstate or LGF or freerepublic, I feel fear because the language there is so loaded with meanness and derision, as though the commenters could reach through my screen to lash out at me.
It’s 2am and since I’m mostly alone here, I think, just for old time’s sake….
I Pledge Allegiance
to the Flag
of the United States of America
and to the Republic
for which it stands;
One Nation, under God
indivisable
With Liberty and Justice
for all.
Steele is wrong in just every way you can be. Here is just two that stuck in my craw. The idea of just war and the laws of war started with Muslims and Catholics in the middle ages -that was about arabs fighting arabs and white people fighting white people. These ideas got a big boost from mid 18th through end of 19th century in Europe -more white people fighting white people. Certainly the Geneva Conventions were about how to head towards minimal war, and this was a very white on white affair of late 19th century Europe.
And another thing, we are supposed to believe that there were no white people in the US advocating “minimal war” back before white guilt was supposed to popular. So there were no whites in the US protesting treatment of Native Americans in the 19th century? No whites protesting Mexican War, no whites protesting US suppression of Philippine independence? Mark Twain didn’t have to apologize for suggesting the US adopt the skull and crossbones as the national flag?
Damn funny how conservatives like this can show the most grotesque kind of ignorance -that they would condemn and wail about as showing the decline of standards. Yet they walk around without a doubt in their heads about their superior knowledge and wisdom. It is a phenom deserving of scientific study.
I like my pledge the old fashion way
I Pledge Allegiance
to the Flag
of the United States of America
and to the Republic
for which it stands;
One Nation, indivisable
With Liberty and Justice
for all.
wesgpc #56
Exactly. The abolitionists should have kept their mouths shut; then everything would be hunky-dory today. Has Mr. Steele asked himself where that would have left him, I wonder?
david, thank you for such a thoughtful and thought-provoking article.
as always, your writing gives me both cause for concern and the needed energy to push for change.
I think we should try a Pledge of Allegiance in Spanish.
rocksaw: But to take the side of one at the expense of the other does not help the situation.
I agree. Illegal immigration is not, in a number of very significant ways, a good versus evil issue, and it has no easy solution. There are literally billions of impoverished people in the world. If we take them all into our system, one by one, the point will come when even the best and most unselfish among us reaches an intolerable level of personal suffering. Right now, it’s only staggering health insurance premiums. When it comes down to starvation, it will really start to hurt … physically. And make no mistake that that’s exactly what it will come down to if we try to do the right thing for all of humanity. Hundreds of thousands of innocent, wonderful human beings are dying every day. How much of your own comfort … how much of your very survival … are you willing to put on the line to save how many of them? If someone held guns to heads of your parents, and you could only save one, which would you save? It’s that kind of unthinkably terrible choice that lies at the heart of this. It’s not a political issue. It’s a human tragedy. Of course we have to take care of the illegal Mexicans here. We know them — we’ve seen their faces — we’ve heard their voices — they’re our friends and neighbors — at least where I live. What about the other 52 million Mexicans still in Mexico? And Mexico is one of the less impoverished countries in THIS hemisphere — think of Africa. Where does it stop? Sure, I sent a $200 check to the Red Cross for the Katrina victims. But I didn’t sell my house and send the proceeds, now did I? Did you?
I had long since given up on “the left” for being essentially hypocritical — for sipping $9 a glass chardonnay while preaching about the rights of the impoverished. It took the unbelievable crimes of Bush, Cheney & Rove to bring me back into the fold and stir me to righteous indignation once again. And I am no fucking doubt righteously indignant, but when we’ve gotten rid of these bastard crooks, and we’re left with real problems that need real solutions, it’s not going to be so easy to tell right from wrong.
This new crop of crooked Republicans and phony Christians is ruining our objectivity. Everything they say and do is so unquivocally evil and inexcusable that we’ve become conditioned to expect a simple right & wrong answer to every issue. Well, I, for one, am not a college student any more. I’ve been there and done that, and I’m not about to be fooled again.
One commenter referred to trolls on this post. I hope they weren’t referring to rocksaw #21 and fahrender #49, because I think they make valid points. One reason why Steels’s “odd white bigot†passage is BS is that it is true that many whites are resentful of what they perceive as unfair advantages given to minorities. When you put that together with stagnant or declining wages for many low skilled whites and increased uncertainty, that produces many unconscious white bigots. We all know them. Many of them have “best friends†who are black or Hispanic or Asian or whatever, but when they start talking about faceless communities, they talk like racists. The GOP southern strategy could not have succeeded without there being many of these people.
I do believe that there is institutional racism. I’ve lived at times in the poor inner city, and the very very poor boondocks. I’ve lived in places where I have seen with my own eyes how young African-Americans (book them, carefully following procedure), Hispanics (beat him up, prolly illegal anyway, so what’s he gonna do?), and whites (hey, dude, chill, or you’ll get a really stern warning next time) have been treated differently. And there is always a reason at had that doesn’t directly concern race.
Yet I think it is dishonest to say that it is easy to cure institutional racism, using tools such as affirmative action in hiring, without perceived individual level discrimination against whites. I believe I have seen instances of that too. In fact, twice I have been privately told that I missed an job opportunity for, well, you know, uh, delicate political reasons when competing against some minority. My own thinking was, frankly, “Well, so what? I am a white man and I got oodles of opportunities, something else good will turn up for me. And if we were the finalists, who knows for sure, anyway? Probably not the person who gave me their opinion†(and it was their opinion, not a fact, if one were to be objective about it.)
A whole lot of people don’t see it that way. They would take the helpful tipster’s opinion as fact. They don’t perceive alternative opportunities. So then you get racial resentments, and lawsuits, and lots of angry frustrated white marks for GOP subliminal racist appeals.
What the point? I agree with this insightful post. But we have to look at the big picture and have the guts to confront the GOP racist strategy across the board. These GOP strategists have said that they do not mind working class people getting squeezed so they are more susceptible to resentment and hatred. They do not mind passing crappy bogus international corporate welfare treaties with the words “free trade†in them that will impoverish Mexican lower classes and drive them over the border. In fact that is a great strategy: create an undocumented immigration problem and use it for domestic political advantage. After many places in Mexico are emptied of working age people then the kids and oldsters are easier to rip off. Criminalizing the undocumenteds will effectively lower their wages and working conditions here in the US, and the deportees back to Mexico will end up working for even lower wages in maquilladoras at the border. (hey kids, remember back in the day, then those were in the news and going to create a new Mexican middle calss. Wha happened?)
Conclusion: I think David Niewert is correct as far as he goes, but I think we also need to think about how t convince all the non-wingnuts who are susceptible to subliminal bigotry that they are being used in this game.
I will leave inevitable corollary about how this is another reason centrist Democrat strategy is a pathetic loser as an exercise for the reader. (you know that was coming, huh?)
David,
Best ultra-long post here I can remember. Almost too much brought up to comment upon unless I want to type here until dawn.
Yiddish, Samoan, W singing the anthem en espanol. Porque?
For the end of racism and religious intolerance as those Yiddish, Samoan and Hispanic citizens had known it, that’s porque.
I use Hendrix and his “Star-Spangled Banner” at Woodstock as a metaphor in my music appreciation class. In the class, I try to show that once one talented or ingenious musician has shown the rest of us that some new technique is not only usable but awesome, the rest of us merely have to learn how to do it. The fact that one might have to work harder and practice longer hours to accomplish mastery is part of why the advancement is important. That technique eventually becomes another step along the way of cultural evolution. Every year I hear another eighth-grade guitarist spending hours and hours hoping to get that icon of American patriotic music down.
The meme from the right that racism is over in America is one of the many faulty doctrines they teach which we can use as a wedge.
You see, to them, it doesn’t matter that there have been other renditions of the National Anthem in other languages. For them, it’s the same thing as those dirty Mexicans who were waving Mexican flags: they polluting our culture. They’re taking away our lily-white, English-speaking past and replacing it with a multilingual, multiracial present.
This is very reminiscent of the ugly racism of le Front National in France under Le Pen. Subsititute “North-African Arab” (magrehbin) for “Mexican”. They’re defending a mythic monolithic culture, “les Francais de bonne souche” (the French of pure strong roots, more or less). Intermixed with a strong anti-semetic strain.
obsessed #61 too, huh? See, lots of people get a bit ruffled by liberal and progressive lectures on racism. I do not think they are all trolls. Sermons on racism are needed, especially now. Bad stuff might be brewing that needs to be prevented, or impeded, if possible. But we need to find arguments and perspectives that answer these kinds of concerns.
Anybody who says (or actually believes) that racism is dead in America is either stupid or lying to you.
Way, Way OT
Here’s the Storm Track site if anyone wants to bookmark it. It’s run by a Yale grad student named Bryan Woods. He’s got a pretty good sense of humor about the weather, and a good eye for what’s important. I get the feeling he doesn’t think much of Dr. Gray, and judging from how bad Gray’s forecast was off last year. I agree with him….click here
From Steele’s column:
There are no serious advocates of white supremacy in America today, because whites see this idea as morally repugnant.
This isn’t just wrong, it’s a goddamn lie. There are no serious advocates of white supremacy in America today, because racism is no longer respectable and thus most racists eschew explicit avowals of white supremacy.
Perhaps why Steele so miscontrues the issue is that, for the last 30 years or so, racism has been less about controlling black people than about controlling white people. Racism is the crack cocaine of political discourse. Its function isn’t so much to oppress people of color as to seduce working class white people into forsaking their natural, economic interests for the transitory psychological pleasures of hating and feeling superior.
Americans are the only people I know who are positively insulted when someone tries to speak to them in another language.
Different facial expressions, carriage, clothing and body language also insult them. People don’t seem to realize that a person is not “speaking American†in that regard, and see these differences in Asians or Africans for instance, as insults. Americans can be very insulting about Asian food as well; e.g. “it smells terrible,†nadada, when in fact these are really yummy dishes that are being cooked. Then there’s driving. Honk if you see an Asian. This is particularly acute in the South.
Things that make you go Hummz,
~ Estimates are that by 2020, Anglo Americans will be the minority.
~ The cultural history of America is one that is historically driven by the need to oppress the brown skinned person. First you have the Native Americans that the white man killed to have this land. Then you have the African, whom the white man enslaved to work the land. Then you have the Asian who built on this land. And of course the Hispanic who again works this land.
~ Best of all, we have the Arab. Who has the oil that we conquer his land to claim it as our own.
Now let’s talk about racism. Tony “Snowman” left a chill for me. I read what he said and somehow I felt compelled to mention to myself, The more distant that racism becomes an “UGLY MEMORY”, the more present it becomes to our current reality. What’s next? We’ll be teaching our youth that racism no longer exists and that the dispersions shown toward other societies or cultures is to be considered “NORMAL” ? And the shirt color will be . . . GREEN?
I have long contended that America’s biggest plague unto herself IS racism. While we claim to be THE MELTING POT of societies, we tend to do it best with our own kinds. This is why races tend to segregate themselves. But America, the home of the free? If you’re white.
Along that line of segregated societies and history, I have also long contended that America’s fascination with the BROWN RACES is equivalent to the 1930’s era Germanic States fascination with the Jews. While Hitler had his Jews and Europe was his battle field, so does Bush have his Arabs and the Middle East is his battle field. I mean, come on, America doesn’t attack Indonesia for their al-Qaeda cells, or Spain, or Great Brittan.
What gives?
Last weekend, I got an e-mail containing the following:
See? Not only is bigotry patriotic, it pays well, too!