
Grassroots to AT&T: Are you feelin’ us now?
While Mercenary Mouthpiece Mike McCurry whines and lies, the New York Times editorial page comes out in favor of the people:
"Net neutrality" is a concept that is still unfamiliar to most Americans, but it keeps the Internet democratic. Cable and telephone companies that provide Internet service are talking about creating a two-tiered Internet, in which Web sites that pay them large fees would get priority over everything else. Opponents of these plans are supporting Net-neutrality legislation, which would require all Web sites to be treated equally. Net neutrality recently suffered a setback in the House, but there is growing hope that the Senate will take up the cause.
One of the Internet’s great strengths is that a single blogger or a small political group can inexpensively create a Web page that is just as accessible to the world as Microsoft’s home page. But this democratic Internet would be in danger if the companies that deliver Internet service changed the rules so that Web sites that pay them money would be easily accessible, while little-guy sites would be harder to access, and slower to navigate. Providers could also block access to sites they do not like.That would be a financial windfall for Internet service providers, but a disaster for users, who could find their Web browsing influenced by whichever sites paid their service provider the most money. There is a growing movement of Internet users who are pushing for legislation to make this kind of discrimination impossible. It has attracted supporters ranging from MoveOn.org to the Gun Owners of America. Grass-roots political groups like these are rightly concerned that their online speech could be curtailed if Internet service providers were allowed to pick and choose among Web sites.
Tell us again, Mike you lying sellout, how we online activists are just a bunch of clueless, uncouth whiney kids. . . with whom the New York Times apparently agrees. Chris Bowers exposes the lying bullshit about netroots activists you, Joe Klein and your other pecksniff power pimp sellouts keep hawking at the corner of 17th and L.
Let’s have a look at the names in your lobbying firm, shall we? Oooh, Randy Tate, one of the founders of the Christian Coalition. Tell me again, Mike, about your Democratic bona fides, how we should all be civil and moderate in tone? Let’s check out your clients. Oooooh. . . the Republican National Committee! Well, how-dee-doo! And the Lincoln Chaffee endorsing Sierra Club makes an appearance here, as do both the ACLU and the Department of Homeland Security. Interesting! Would any financial supporters of the ostensibly progressive groups on this list like to send a little note to them about Mike’s firm’s conflicts of interest?
And what does this ultimate insider’s lobbying club call itself? Behold, ladies and gentlemen, the pinnacle of insider DC hubris and deception: the "Grassroots Enterprise." (Mike, if you were not a target already, guess what?) Seems the New York Times and a couple of hundred million Americans might take issue with that name. But I digress. I need to address the genuine grassroots members out there.
We’re making real progress on the Internet Freedom front, and the bad guys are definitely dazed and wobbling on the canvas. We delivered a hard, unexpected punch on the Markey Amendment last week but still need to finish the fight. Rep, Markey has introduced new Net Neutrality legislation in the House, just moments ago. Here’s what you can do today, courtesy of Matt Stoller at MyDD (updated to reflect breaking developments):
1. SIGN a Net Neutrality petition to Congress.
2. CALL Congress now. Especially, tell your representatives in the House to support Markey’s Net Neutrality Act of 2006, but educate your senators on this issue too, as the fight will soon move there.
3. WRITE A LETTER to Congress.
4. MYSPACE: Add "Save the Internet" as a friend.
5. Check out the BLOG RESOURCES about this issue, including "Save the Internet" logo.
6. VISIT the SavetheInternet coalition Web site for more information.




99 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
fitz
Fitz you are!
Yes, Pachutatec, and I urge ALL to go over and let Mr. McCurry know that he has not even begun to explain the alleged principles he has put forward in his defensive and error ridden screed. Since Mr. McCurry is clearly sensitive and defensive, I suspect he is feeling a little guilty. It may be that a few well written zingers might be just what he needs to knock him out of the ring and leave AT&T and Comcast looking for some new fighter for their corner.
“pecksniff power pimp sellouts”
Nicely wrought Pach, you Jane Hamsher of the Left~!
You know you are being taken seriously when they come after you.
This, my friends, is a revolution.
Excellent work, Pach. Funny, I don’t remember Mike McCurry as being a WATB from his Clinton years, but if the shoe has begun to fit…
I love it when Ali shows up here at FDL.
” Pecksniff Power Pimps”
Great wordsmithing Pach
Rep. Charles Gonzalez (D AT&T)
Christy: Mike makes a good heat shield for his employers, but when the punch is directed at him, he’s a total wuss. Look at that HuffPo WATB piece.
McCurry fancies himself a thick-skinned Irishman. You know who’s a street smart, thick skinned Irishman?
Take a look at comment #1 above.
I read McCurry’s HuffPo piece yesterday and didn’t really understand what he was talking about. Neither did Josh Marshall:
“Does anyone understand what this means? I’m not saying this for effect. I really have no idea what he’s talking about.”
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.c…..008342.php
Thanks Pach,
Letters written, petitions signed, friends notified. I always feel so much better when I can do something – Thank you for making it so easy.
Well-written article, by the way. You must be wearning you snarky hat this morning – looks great on you!
The ACLU?
I’m confused. They supported the Markey amendment to COPE.
Are they simply making unwarranted assumptions about McCurry’s political allegiances?
WATB? Translation, please..
WATB = Whiney Ass Titty Baby
I believe Atrios was the originator.
With all this bashing of Mike McCurry I want to give him some props. You’ve got to hand it to McCurry, he’s got guts. To come to HuffPo and and write such a lame, disingenuous, laughably false piece, full of ridiculous non-arguments and absurdly jejune and simply untrue statements attacking imaginary enemies for uncommited offenses takes a lot courage.
Not only is there an amazing pantload of crap there is also some great (unintended) hilarity. As in “This is not an issue where there is a progressive, pro-little guy, pro-Dem stand versus the big bad companies that pay big bad lobbyists (what a joke you think I am one of them).”
The joke’s on you, Mike.
I particularly love his last comment where he claims to want a rational conversation after going out of his way to avoid one. Brilliant!
But, alas, one can be brave and still a fool. And a dangerous fool at that.
I am sure his corporate paymasters are thrilled. They are the only ones.
LeisureGuy:
http://www.urbandictionary.com…..?term=WATB
I would like to know the meaning of
1. EPU
2. WATB
I would appreciate anyone taking a sec to solve my puzzlement.
LeisureGuy at 14 — WATB was Atrios’ original nickname for Harris at the WaPo (I think, if my brain remembers this correctly.) It stands for “Whiny Ass Titty Baby” — but it has morphed into that whole “ooooh, your criticism is mean…stop it, stop it” sort of behavior description of people who can dish it out, but have no expectation of ever being on the receiving end. McCurry’s screed at HuffPo yesterday was a prime example of that.
Dates % % % Disapprove
.
CBS 4/28-30/06 33 58 9 -25
.
USA Today/Gallup 4/28-30/06 34 63 3 -29
.
NBC/Wall Street Journal 4/21-24/06 36 57 7 -21
.
CNN 4/21-23/06 32 60 8 -28
.
FOX/Opinion Dynamics RV 4/18-19/06 33 57 10 -24
.
Pew 4/7-16/06 35 55 10 -20
Here are the most recent JARs for GW Clusterfuck- seems to be sinking deeper and deeper.
theExile:
http://futuredv.blogspot.com/2…..pu-on.html
Nice pic of Ali- perhaps the world’s best athlete. Amazing reflexes- stunning grace and quickness. Incredible man.
82 casualties in Iraq last month. We’ve turned the corner.
rwcole:
We’ve turned the corner so many times, it seems we’re right back where we started.
:-(
Exile 18 – EPU=to have your post get left behind on an old thread after everybody’s jumped to a new one. So called for commenter Evil Parallel Universe who it famously kept happening to.
By George Jahn, Associated Press Writer
VIENNA — Oil prices rose above $74 a barrel Tuesday — flirting with their record high above $75 reached last month — amid concern that international pressure on Iran to modify its nuclear program may lead to supply disruptions from the key exporter.
Bolivia’s moves to secure greater state control of its energy reserves and production also supported prices, as did glitches at several U.S. and foreign refineries, despite the relatively small amount of gasoline shortfalls involved.
Moves toward nationalization by Bolivian President Evo Morales, along with similar plans in Venezuela and Ecuador “could influence further supply worries,” said Vienna’s PVM Oil Associates.
Still, Iran remained the main focus of concern.
USA Today
I vote Mike a Ron Ziegler medal of freedom – way to go Mike!
Thanx everyone!
30 year fixed rate mortgages hit 6.7%. We are one more fed bump away from 7% money- then hello housing bubble bursting party.
Iraq city council in Basra vows “martyring” efforts to prevent US attack on Iran.
*Bush claims to vow to bring the war to Iran in an effort to fight them “way over there” instead of over here.
http://veredictum.com/node/194
-GSD
Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced the Network Neutrality Act of 2006 today.
Full text here, courtesy of Alternet.
YES!!
WASHINGTON – A congressional watchdog group asked the Justice Department on Monday to investigate whether Rep. Katherine Harris, R-Fla., attempted to obtain a $10 million appropriation for a defense contractor in return for his financial support.
Common Cause filed a complaint with the Justice Department, citing information provided by contractor Mitchell Wade, as part of a plea agreement in the bribery case of convicted former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham, R-Calif…
OT, but almost swallowed my coffee mug reading these letters….
One of the “letters†at E & P.
“”The routine went over well with this particular crowd — better than did Colbert’s, in fact, for whatever reason.”


If the reason was not obvious to you, you also, in all probabilty, don’t understand why “talk radio” has listeners and Air America does not. I love satire, and admire anybody who can do it well, but out-and-out nastiness doesn’t cut it. Years back, I stopped watching Jay Leno when he made so much fun of Paula Jones’ facial features and Kathryn Harris’s makeup. Political correctness doesn’t seem to apply to liberals.â€
http://tinyurl.com/malxl
Thanks, Dr. Bong. I had looked in various dictionaries of acronyms, without finding anything appropriate. (”We are the best”? That didn’t seem right.) Now that I know, I can feel like the in-group, too. Still, it was once considered courtesy in writing to first use the fully spelled out term, followed by the acronym in parentheses, and only then use the acronym. But I suppose that was in publications which expected new readers. (Sorry for the snark, but I really hate in-group jargon. It’s so self-congratulatory.)
IIRC, I read in a recent Atrios thread that WATB was coined by regular Atrios commenter “four legs good”, and was a term used by a boyhood friend. Now, back to my letter writing. And thanks, Pachacutec, for making this so easy.
What could better shift attention from Clusterfuck’s failure in Iraq than a new failure in Iran?
Clusterfuck doesn’t do the war thing very well.
Net Neutrality was the only issue outside of legal immigration mentioned at yesterday’s march in Austin -
the speaker was a 17 year old girl – a self confessed ‘my space addict’ – caught her later jawboning the SEIU Reps to link it – fabulous
and hey “grassroots ?” – why not, now that we have “healthy forests’ “clean water” and “clear skies”
Thanks, Morris Sheppard for your McCurry quote (at #16): “This is not an issue where there is a progressive, pro-little guy, pro-Dem stand versus the big bad companies that pay big bad lobbyists (what a joke you think I am one of them).â€
It’s the parenthetical that tells all. McCurry has crossed over to the dark side not only with his sell-out of principles, not only with his client base, not only with his wingnut colleagues, but with his adoption of Karl Rove’s trademark preemptive projection — preemptively accusing your opponents of the very thing you know you’re guilty of, to try prospectively to immunize yourself.
cf., “I know you are but what am I?”
I am wondering if this is too reductive: nothing good has come from this [107th-109th] congress yet, which is reason enough to oppose it.
McCurry is The Communications Expert, yet he did not so much provide the rationale for this legislation as his rationalization for pimping it.
The bastard is flicking his bic on the bridge of the Hindenberg.
WASHINGTON (CNN) — Acknowledging the energy situation is a “crisis,” U.S. Energy Secretary Sam Bodman said Sunday it could take three years before drivers get relief from high gas prices.
Speaking on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Bodman blamed the increase in gas prices on the rising cost of a barrel of oil.
“The suppliers have lost control of the market and therefore, demand exceeds supply,” Bodman said.
“Clearly we’re going to have a number of years — two or three years — before suppliers are going to be in a position to meet the demands of those who are consuming this product.”
CNN
So that’s convenient. Oil prices are going to stay high as long as this idiot is energy secretary. He’s saying that everything will be all right- but not until he and Clusterfuck leave office.
Great post, Pach. That certianly is an impressive spanking going on over at the HuffPo. I always love it when so-called “moderates” (*cough*) think show up at the HuffPo and think they are doing us all a favor by fobbing off a bunch of bullshit (Joke Line, Donnie Fowler, etc.) I love it even more when the readers send them packing.
Who is Sam Bodman?
http://www.fromthewilderness.c…..dman.shtml
James Lucier, a Washington analyst with the Prudential Equity Group, has said, “The choice of Bodman is a signal that they want to continue using the Energy Department as more of a long-term transformation change agent than a high-profile position.”2 If confirmed, Bodman has said that he will carry out… “sound energy policy to ensure a steady supply of affordable energy for America’s homes and businesses, and to work toward the day when America achieves energy independence.”3
It is expected that Bodman will promote Vice-President Dick Cheney’s energy initiative. He is expected to deregulate the energy industry and promote new nuclear power plant construction, clean coal-burning plants, and to press for drilling in ANWR and elsewhere within the US. Given his educational background in chemical engineering, his appointment will likely boost confidence in the Energy Department’s proposed transition to a hydrogen economy.
Cheney Still in Control of Energy Policy
The Bodman nomination signals that the Bush administration wants an experienced administrator to run the department, leaving energy policymaking to the White House. Although the White House has long denied it, industry insiders and energy experts long ago concluded that Dick Cheney is in direct control of energy policy. “There is no doubt whatsoever that (Cheney) sets the broad direction and is keeping an eye on these agencies to make sure they follow their checklists,” James Lucier has said.4
Nice work Pach. I also want to thank Morris Shepard in 16 above for his usage of “jejune”. A moment for a vocabulary-geek to savor. I read McCurry’s piece yesterday and found it rebarbative, to say the least.
In this, and several other confrontations lately, I am reminded of Bill Clinton’s smack-down of Jerry Brown early in the 1992 campaign. Brown brought up something about Hilary’s finances, and Clinton literally swelled with anger and snapped, “You’ve got a lot of nerve talking about my wife, standing there in your 600-dollar suit with your family money.” (I may have the number wrong). I don’t recall anyone ever trying a cheap shot like that on Clinton again when he was in earshot. I’ll give McCurry credit for trying to fight back, but he’s really punching into the air when he starts whining about the poor Pulitzer-prize-winning journalists that we’re too mean to. No sale, Mikester.
peace,
jim
RWCole,
Notice the pattern. Someone else will have to deal with Iraq too.
-GSD
This nation is soaring.
-Stephen Colbert
Interesting healine over at Raw Story:
Bush ‘ready to blow’ after Colbert skit… Developing…
hope so. ;)
Mike McCurry has completely lost it. And doesn’t he know that we know the papers are owned by the corporations and the WH and those are the intimidators and deciders… nice post Pach!!!
“Oil prices are going to stay high as long as this idiot is energy secretary. He’s saying that everything will be all right- but not until he and Clusterfuck leave office.”
That is not altogether a bad thing. It improves the likelihood they will leave. OTOH should the deme grow restive, they can use it as an excuse to declare a State of Emergency. Perhaps that is an objective. Clearly if it is do-able Chancellor Cheney will.
GSD– Yeah- it’s pretty interesting.
In 2004, americans elected an all gooper government- the dream team. GW Clusterfuck ridin point and a host of wingnutters by his side.
Now- with over two and a half years to go- the gooper dream team is in meltdown. They can’t get ANYTHING done- they don’t even have any PLANS to do anything. They’re dead in the fuckin water- reduced to flag burning amendments and gay marriage bans.
In the meantime- the USA is in one of the most dangerous situations it has ever faced- all brought to you by the dream team.
Incredible.
What does Clusterfuck have to say about the fucking mess? “We’ve turned the corner!”
cbl… rwcole… and GSD
OT but…If you got a minute to go off site and read this guys take on the oil addiction frame..I would appreciate your thoughts
http://jeffrey-feldman.typepad…..sheik.html
While the great decider was taking a very long nap- the gooper ship of state wandered into shallow waters. It is mired and is being battered by high seas. Unable to move forward- and prevented from moving backwards by a rare brain disorder- the decider has decided to ignore the crisis and pretend that everything’s just swell.
2 1/2 more years of this bullshit? Can the nation survive it?
From US News & World Report:
Skewering comedy skit angers Bush and aides
By Paul Bedard
Posted 5/1/06
Comedy Central star Stephen Colbert’s biting routine at the White House Correspondents Association dinner won a rare silent protest from Bush aides and supporters Saturday when several independently left before he finished.
“Colbert crossed the line,” said one top Bush aide, who rushed out of the hotel as soon as Colbert finished. Another said that the president was visibly angered by the sharp lines that kept coming.
“I’ve been there before, and I can see that he is [angry],” said a former top aide. “He’s got that look that he’s ready to blow.” …
_____
Tough shit, punk-assed Deciderer.
Here it is Codpiece about to blow:
>>>>>
Comedy Central star Stephen Colbert’s biting routine at the White House Correspondents Association dinner won a rare silent protest from Bush aides and supporters Saturday when several independently left before he finished.
“Colbert crossed the line,” said one top Bush aide, who rushed out of the hotel as soon as Colbert finished. Another said that the president was visibly angered by the sharp lines that kept coming.
“I’ve been there before, and I can see that he is [angry],” said a former top aide. “He’s got that look that he’s ready to blow.
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/n…..hwatch.htm
Quick, hit the Gannon Button, Bush is about to blow!
-GSD
Wow. I can’t believe it. I went to bed last night and couldn’t sleep, so I got out of bed and blogged about McCurry… first thing I’ve blogged about in almost a month.
Then, I start my day with FDL and look what the topic is.
Apparently Bush believes “crossing the line” is the exclusive prerogative of the Absolute (sic) Executive.
If you want to know what a sell-out this group is, go to their web site and see “who they are”.
http://www.grassroots.com/who/
Not only is Mike McCurry one of the founders, but Randy Tate — one of the biggest know-nothings ever having served in Congress. This guy was voted out of office (WA state) so quick you could hear is political placenta tear. Where did he land? At the helm of the Christian Coalition.
So, why would a ‘liberal, clinton loving’ McCurry form a political organization with pro-life, pro-jesus, pro-whitebread “rockin’ randy tate”?
I smell someone trying to fill Jack Abramoff’s hole.
Everybody who hasn’t read what is being done to Mike McCurry over at HuffPo should amble on over there and have a read. There’s some BRILLIANT invective being dumped in Mikey boy’s lap in the comments section after his lame posting on Net Neutrality.
kinda O/T
Don’t know if it’s been covered here before but, if ever you need a ‘good read’ – pick up Hunter S. Thompson’s essays and interviews with Muhammed Ali – I think it’s better than any of his Fear and Loathing pieces
BobbyG # 32 – not that Common Cause needed help, but can’t help but wonder if they had any ‘tips’ on Kathy from the usual suspects
and vocabulary geeks upthread – I was once dazzled by a guy longer than I should have been b/c he used perspicacious appropriately on the first date
Wolcott’s got a new one up on the Colbert performance, and it’s fabulous, as usual.
http://jameswolcott.com/archiv…..p_pros.php
Man, I want to be Wolcott when I grow up.
Just one moment while I add to my list of people I should avoid pissing off:
*Morris Sheppard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I don’t see the RNC on the on-site client list? Has it been changed or did you pull it from someplace other than the lobbyists site, Pach?
I dont really object to a lobbyist firm that has different lobbyists representing entities that have competing interests, although it depends on how you bill yourself. From what I have read, though, Mike’s conflicts issues tend to crop more when facts meet his statements or coherent argument struggles for ascendency over his mental jello jiggle of: “liberals scared pulitzer prize winning journalists out of asking the hard questions.”
Colbert had a point about boxing glaciers, but I think he is lacking in jello wrestling experience to have the correct metaphor for Mike.
Deadlast I totally agree.
The Grassroots Astroturf McCurry shop has Christian Coalition ties? WTF?
Bottom line: when you act like a republican, squawk like a republican, hang out with republicans: Then you are a republican. See ya Mike enjoy going down with Bush’s sinking ship.
McCurry is operating from the Rove playbook. You take a bill that will benefit the GOP/corporate/whatever and cloak it in a moral voice – which as we know means Christians hacks like Ralph Reed. Every Astroturf group need a Christians face to put on a corporate bill. Example: Next week Rep. Goodlatte is going to help out his donors in the horseracing industry by making the gambling activity of their competitors (offshore online gambling firms) illegal. He hypocritically calls it anti-gambling legislation and Christians run around like he is going to legislate morality – when infact he will enshrine gambling interests like those of republican horse racers.
Anyone want to tackle the corporate client rooster list of McCurry and compare with the press releases from the Christian coalition? I bet anything you find some religious group that is opposed to net neutrality. Any other “grassroots efforts†coming out to bat against this bill?
Here is a good example of how guys like this work Check out the article on Jack: http://www.hillnews.com/thehil…..news4.html
Just wondering what the Gannon button is supposed to do -does it unleash a Gannon Gimp that mauls you like some kind of trunk monkey?
I imagine getting Gannonized could also simply block your airway, making speech prohibitive.
Larry– Nice piece- although pretty sketchy on the details of a solution.
If you haven’t read Kevin Phillip’s latest book- “American Theocracy”, I recommend it.
One of the interesting parts was a recap of Carter’s handling of the last big oil crisis.
What did Carter do?
First of all he called on americans to conserve energy- he put on a sweater and asked other americans to do the same.
He challenged congress to raise the fuel efficiency standard for cars over an extended period.
What happened?
The nation’s oil consumption actually DECREASED over ten years. The price of oil went DOWN- to $10 per barrel. IT WORKED!
The situation today is a bit different. The world oil industry will hit a production peak within the next ten years. At that point- it will begin a fairly rapid decline. Prices will escalate rapidly. We ain’t seen NOTHING yet.
Goopers refuse to do what Carter did. Reduced consumption could trigger profit losses to major contributors.
It’s really not a question of whether or not we will reduce consumption. We will. Somewhere around $6 per gallon- people will make changes.
At $6 per gallon- it will cost $100 to fill yer tank. Gas is ALREADY at $6 per gallon in Europe.
What needs to be done is:
1) America needs to be told to conserve (the bully pulpit).
2) The subsidies for ultra high mileage vehicles and solar power installations need to be increased dramatically. The govt should pick up half the cost of a typical solar installation and up to $5,000 for an ultra high mileage vehicle.
3) Zero interest 30 year financing for solar installations needs to be arranged for. The loan repayment should come from the power bill. People are afraid to invest in solar power because they don’t have the cash- or because they are afraid that they’ll move within a few years and won’t get the investment back. By using the financing through the utility bill method- their utility bill would be reduced a bit- as would the utility bills of potential buyers- even with the payback of the loan included.
4) CAFE standards should be raised to a fleet standard of 40 MPG over the next ten years (including light trucks).
The effect of these short term changes would be massive in the mid term. If a person can get the incremental cost of the superior technology covered- we would see a reduction in energy consumption that grows annually as the fleet slowly gets turned over and as the solar power installations come on line. We would NEVER have to build another power plant!
The vehicles of the near future will be “plug in multi-fuel hybrids” getting 100 mpg and running on any of a number of alternative fuels. The only missing ingredient is better batteries- and Toyota just bought the company in Japan that owns the technology to do it–General Motors sold it recently- idiots!
Excellent post Pachahutec on an important topic. Why is it that members of the House and those who lobby them are so like cockroaches: impossible to get rid of but really disliking having a bright light shone on what they are doing.
rwcole #40
With crude oil prices on the rise again after dipping slightly, gas prices are likely to follow. Bodman’s comments are just so expectable from an Administration filled with oilmen: Can’t do a thing about them prices. Like to but can’t so no sense trying. Fact is we have no control over ‘em. Act of God. Holy Jesus, sorry, just saw what my stock in Exxon was doing, Bob, call up my country club and tell them I will buy that lifetime membership, now where were we, oh yeah, sorry, well it’s been nice but I have another appointment. Bob, can you see if I can get a one o’clock links time, yeah, well goodbye now, y’all.
Yay!!
Currently #19 on Google for “Mike McCurry”:
http://www.firedoglake.com/200…..t-freedom/
Let’s hope it rises. Google bomb away.
Someone please screengrab the client list:
http://www.grassroots.com/who/clients/
Before they change it. The Republican Naional Commmittee is still there.
BTW – Colbert’s own clip choice was great last night. He had the Dana Milbank “OMG, I’d never in a million years have the nerve to say that” audience shot and he played birds and crickets chirping to fill in for the silent, shell shocked crowd.
I think he had a hard time all through the program night not breaking into smiles.
rwcole…
thanks for taking a peek at that and your comments ….spot on as usual
preciate your insights
gotta go bye yall…be good
Pach 67,
Grabbed a couple of shots. Lemme know if you want ‘em.
Hilde
Here’s an estimate of the numbers involved in a solar power installation:
An installation that produces about 80% of the power needed to run a typical house- and plug in hybrid vehicle- would cost about $40,000.
If the govt picks up half- the cost comes down to $20,000.
If the $20,000 is financed over 30 years (the estimated life of such a system), the cost is $666 per year- or $55 per month. The typical savings would be over $100 per month in reduced electricity charges at today’s rates. Who wouldn’t agree to a deal like that? Solar power would become a new huge industry in this country- and one would expect rapid advances in the technology. The saving would, of course, grow as energy prices escalate.
Sure the govt. would be fronting a pile of cash- but not more per kilowatt hour than it does already for nukes and new power plants- and these would be zero emmissions with next to zero maintainence.
I heard Bill Clinton speaking on the radio on this subject a few months ago. He understands it backwards, forwards, and sideways.
All we need is a new president.
While reading this piece, (Thanks Pach) I remembered something that happened to me a while back. I went to the blogs at msn.com and guess what! You can’t view this page unless you have IE6 installed on your computer.
Aside from banning our favorite sites in favor of their favorite sites, I wonder how much the protection racket involved in this is planned to make software obsolete so you HAVE to upgrade/buy new software. But planned or not, I bet if they beat us on this issue it will be a factor.
Let’s make sure they don’t get the chance to prove me wrong. ;)
rwcole at #64- I like the sound of that. Although gas is at $6 gallon in Europe, over 50% of new auto sales are diesel (at least in the UK) compared to 5% of the market in diesel sales in the US. US automakers dropped the ball big time in not developing its diesel engine technology. Now, with the second generation common rail diesels (CRD), makers like BMW, and DaimlerChrysler are poised to launch significantly expanded options for their diesels here beginning this fall.
I don’t know that Big Oil paid US auto makers to corral us in less efficient gasoline autos, but the lack of foresight in Big Oil’s inability to keep up with demand raises an eyebrow.
Muzzy–Mercedes has built prototype plug in deisel hybrids able to run on a wide variety of fuels. This is not future technology- it’s available now- just not in production. Even a mediocre government could make it happen very quickly.
Waaaaaaay to Gooogle Bomb this post!!! Keep it up. Let’s hammer the christian coalition/RNC connection all day.
I am sure they are about 30 min away from editing their website.
nice self-pwnage McCurry
now stfu & gbtw, n00b
not to sound like Froomkin’s handmaiden or shill, but he really, really has Colbert’s back. And met the Rover in the flesh and lived to tell.
i just have to say how much i enjoyed the backlash to mike mccurry’s insulting, contemptuous hissyfit. man, i always considered him one of decent guys from the clinton team. i had no idea he’d set up shop; sad to see he’s just another contract-seeking whore.
and what and excellent, to the point nyt editorial. with perfect timing to boot. lol
I don’t believe McCurry’s doing this for a simple paycheck. There’s that, of course- what self respecting old school insider can pass up ill gotten gains? But there’s more. What’s the greatest threat to the survival of the DC political adviser class?
Internets duh.
He’s doing dirty dual duty by supporting a harmful policy and, now, by going directly into rhetorical partnership with traditional media and its overblown self-importance.
A steel cage death match with the terrible terrible fever swamp yields delicious cocktail weenies, no?
Pachacutec – I just did a Firefox Scrapbook capture (html + graphics) of the Grassroots Enterprise clients page, just in case they change it.
NBC News and news services
Updated: 1:45 p.m. ET May 2, 2006
KABUL, Afghanistan – A top al-Qaida leader with links to Osama bin Laden’s training camps and extremist networks in Europe was captured in Pakistan and has been flown out of the country, a U.S. official told the Associated Press.
Mustafa Setmarian Nasar, a dual Syrian-Spanish national with a $5 million U.S. bounty on his head, was taken to an unspecified location, Pakistani officials told the AP…
_____
Think they aren’t already torturing this dude? Right.
Over just the past few weeks, a Democratic Party that seemed nearly moribund in nonfederal races has leapt back to life. South Dakotans who had been disengaged from politics have flocked to circulate petitions for a ballot measure that would overturn the new law. Democrats are fielding candidates for 90 percent of the state House and Senate seats up this fall, more than at any time in the past 14 years. And not one but two credible Democratic candidates  Jack Billion and Dennis Wiese  are vying to take on Gov. Mike Rounds (R), whose re-election this fall had until recently been considered a cakewalk.
“This has been the most extraordinary month in South Dakota politics that I’ve ever witnessed,” said Sioux Falls attorney and Democratic activist Todd Epp. “Literally a month ago, the Democrats here were a beaten lot. Ron Volesky, our only serious gubernatorial candidate, pulled out of the race with about $3,000 in the bank. We were having problems with candidate recruitment. It was typical Democratic defeatism. Then the bill got passed and signed and the people of the state woke up. It has been amazing.”
Although the abortion ban wended through the Legislature for the better part of two years, it didn’t attract much public attention until the legislative endgame in February and March, said Mitch Krebs, the news director of KSFY-TV in Sioux Falls.
“There wasn’t a firestorm of opposition right off the bat,” he said. “There were not a lot of letters to the editor about it. That’s why it seemed to come out of nowhere.”
Now what other gooper states wanna pass this law? Do it goopers- do it!
Larry,
For a longtime the left and anyone not in the far right have allowed Rush Limbaugh to define issues on a national level.
Any talk of conservation was “ranting” by “environmental whackos”.
Of course, all of the things postulated by those whackos turns out to be spot on.
The framing of “addiction to oil” puts the onus on the poor junkies, us. Perhaps we can talk about “petroleum pimps” who have made a killing out of keeping America wed to an energy policy that will help to drive the nation off of a cliff while they continue to load the banks with the money from their junkie clients.
As with RWCole.
*Conservation on a massive scale. Hello Jimmy Carter.
*Investment in mass transit, not the continued hamstringing of the system–as witnessed in the way congress always dicks with Amtrack.
*Focus on the renewables–wind, hydro, solar. Also an effort on the part of local, state and federal governments to use those sources in all areas possible.
* A serious debate by serious people, not lobbyists and phony scientists like Michael Crichton.
-GSD
When MS Vista rolls out, there will be the end of support for Win 98 and ME. Even though Microsoft is supporting NN (for now), I put nothing past people willing to play with China in the Long Game.
New USA Today/Gallup Poll
Bush JAR 34%
Coz- yep- and new CBS has him at 33%. He’s still sinkin- and stinkin.
Bush poll numbers continue decline
USA Today/Gallup puts Bush at 34 percent; CBS pegs Bush at 33
Raw Story
rwcole,
There goes my pony : ( LOL
new thread
any way you folks could keep this issue “top” and center for the next couple of weeks? readers need to see this first thing every time they arrive at the site.
thanks for the coverage you have been giving this; it’s been great.
I used mcjoan’s list from kos net neutrality diary & made calls to about 3/4. I said don’t mess with the net. Cole’s person said her boss agreed with me. Putnam’s person wasn’t interested cause I’m not from his state. Now, it seems to me that this is a national issue & will affect us all and I am sure I can send some money to his opponent when he wants to reup. Isn’t Putnam a cousin to the lovely Katherine Harris or am I wrong?
My two cents. This is definitely a matter of getting the word out and making it so everyone can understand. I don’t even care if we are working on the same side of G*n Own*rs of America. I think it is about freedom of speech. This member of the choir already hit the keyboard sotospeak.
Bravo Fire! Keep it up…I will write to some those folks as well. McCurry, at this stage of his current career, is no differnet than Abramoff or Scanlon or any of the hundreds of K street bloodsuckers collecting huge dollars! Boycott the “Grassroots” list of clients now!! J
GSD > “…Perhaps we can talk about “petroleum pimps ”
PetroPimps(tm)
I like the image(s)
*sigh*, EPU`ed again
“Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.” – some Big Oil Executive
I note that Brad DeLong doesn’t agree:
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/…..bbyis.html
DeLong says he has no opinion:
I don’t know enough about “net neutrality†to have an opinion, other than that Telco regulation is incredibly complicated.
How anyone could construe that as opposition is beyond me.
Check out the back end – it’s being run by a firm called “GetActive.com.”
Go to http://handsofftheinternet.com/hoti_docs/signup/ and click “sign up as an individual”
What’s their deal?
“Net neutrality” versus “net monopolism.”
Aaaah, that is the question.
Whether ’tis nobler to stick with democratic “net neutrality” in the United States or go the way of the Communist Red Chinese with their “net monopolism”, must give us pause?
In fact, some of our nation’s telecom companies have already proven they haven’t any problem with Communist China’s “net monopolism,” haven’t they?
Thus, I am a NetPatriot, unlike all the NetTraitors out to turn our “neutral” internet into one like the Communist Chinese have.
Vote American. Vote “net neutral.”