<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reliable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:51:21 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jeanne</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-86138</link>
		<dc:creator>jeanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 14:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-86138</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;the status quo is threatened by the blogosphere, particularly the liberal bloggers. power to the people!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the status quo is threatened by the blogosphere, particularly the liberal bloggers. power to the people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Enquiring Mind</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-86099</link>
		<dc:creator>An Enquiring Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 13:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-86099</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Saw the guys from Sweet Jesus I hate Bill O’Reilly on Countdown Friday nite. Here’s an idea for a new blog: Sweet Jesus I Hate Howie the Putz.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw the guys from Sweet Jesus I hate Bill O’Reilly on Countdown Friday nite. Here’s an idea for a new blog: Sweet Jesus I Hate Howie the Putz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SombreroFallout</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-86044</link>
		<dc:creator>SombreroFallout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 11:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-86044</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;falcone wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This stuff is mildly amusing invective, but itâ€™s not good writing. I donâ€™t support Kurtzâ€™s statement, but the examples youâ€™ve given donâ€™t do much to contradict him:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;â€œHowie the Putz is practically begging for a job at Faux News.â€ &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I mean, câ€™mon. We laugh because we agree with him, but itâ€™s about at the level of a 9-year old fighting with his 11-year old sister. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have to agree with falcone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lileks is an idiot and a raving loon.  I’d actually agree with him on a principle or two, but he tortures language and fact so severely in the process of taking a pitchfork and torch to his liberal monsters, that he’s just laughable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The idea that Howie admires his &lt;i&gt;writing,&lt;/i&gt; of all things, is just ludicrous.  And telling: we have a journalist who knows not from writing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ailes’ “Whores Your Daddy?” was inspired, and his writing’s not necessarily bad (nor terribly good) overall, but falcone has it right: when Jane Hamsher &lt;i&gt;doesn’t&lt;/i&gt; like a writer’s factually-based point of view, then that person is “just another bullshit artist.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ailes has Howie Kurtz dead to rights, factually — but he’s an easy target.  Kurtz is thick as a brick, virtually if not literally senseless, but “Howie the Putz” is not good writing.  It’s a cop-out &lt;i&gt;to&lt;/i&gt; good writing. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Next we’ll hear that Matthew Cooper is a good journalist because &lt;i&gt;he’s a nice guy.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Richard D. Felsing&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>falcone wrote:<br />
<i>This stuff is mildly amusing invective, but itâ€™s not good writing. I donâ€™t support Kurtzâ€™s statement, but the examples youâ€™ve given donâ€™t do much to contradict him:</i></p>
<p>â€œHowie the Putz is practically begging for a job at Faux News.â€ </p>
<p>I mean, câ€™mon. We laugh because we agree with him, but itâ€™s about at the level of a 9-year old fighting with his 11-year old sister. </p>
<p>I have to agree with falcone.</p>
<p>Lileks is an idiot and a raving loon.  I’d actually agree with him on a principle or two, but he tortures language and fact so severely in the process of taking a pitchfork and torch to his liberal monsters, that he’s just laughable.</p>
<p>The idea that Howie admires his <i>writing,</i> of all things, is just ludicrous.  And telling: we have a journalist who knows not from writing.</p>
<p>Ailes’ “Whores Your Daddy?” was inspired, and his writing’s not necessarily bad (nor terribly good) overall, but falcone has it right: when Jane Hamsher <i>doesn’t</i> like a writer’s factually-based point of view, then that person is “just another bullshit artist.”</p>
<p>Ailes has Howie Kurtz dead to rights, factually — but he’s an easy target.  Kurtz is thick as a brick, virtually if not literally senseless, but “Howie the Putz” is not good writing.  It’s a cop-out <i>to</i> good writing. </p>
<p>Next we’ll hear that Matthew Cooper is a good journalist because <i>he’s a nice guy.</i><br />
Richard D. Felsing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John West</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-86040</link>
		<dc:creator>John West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 11:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-86040</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, Howie! Read Hunter! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or any of half a dozen other dKos favorites. You won’t even need your dictionary.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Howie! Read Hunter! </p>
<p>Or any of half a dozen other dKos favorites. You won’t even need your dictionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeyess</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-86005</link>
		<dc:creator>joeyess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 06:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-86005</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well no wonder Howie doesn’t think much of lefty bloggers…………..they describe him perfectly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can’t have THAT in the warm fuzzy cocoon of D.C.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sheeesh!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well no wonder Howie doesn’t think much of lefty bloggers…………..they describe him perfectly.</p>
<p>Can’t have THAT in the warm fuzzy cocoon of D.C.</p>
<p>Sheeesh!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebewilderness</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-85864</link>
		<dc:creator>thebewilderness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 04:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-85864</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’m tempted to introduce him to Twisty at Iblamethepatriarchy, but I don’t think he would survive it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m tempted to introduce him to Twisty at Iblamethepatriarchy, but I don’t think he would survive it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theExile</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-84091</link>
		<dc:creator>theExile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-84091</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent job of repositioning a head into the receptacle it lives in…………!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have to agree with the commenter who most likely accurately deduced Howie prolly only sees blogs of the right. With a few exceptions (who become towers of neocon wisdom) the right write wrong - can’t spell, have no concept of grammar or logic.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent job of repositioning a head into the receptacle it lives in…………!</p>
<p>I have to agree with the commenter who most likely accurately deduced Howie prolly only sees blogs of the right. With a few exceptions (who become towers of neocon wisdom) the right write wrong &#8211; can’t spell, have no concept of grammar or logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c u n d gulag</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-84084</link>
		<dc:creator>c u n d gulag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-84084</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Jane,&lt;br /&gt;
What he practices couldn’t even be called propaganda.  It should be call amateur-aganda.&lt;br /&gt;
Howie da Putz - what a dope…  what a moroon…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jane,<br />
What he practices couldn’t even be called propaganda.  It should be call amateur-aganda.<br />
Howie da Putz &#8211; what a dope…  what a moroon…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kitt</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-84028</link>
		<dc:creator>Kitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-84028</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;itâ€™s hard to pick out even three beautiful writers from the millions of bloggers.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have to wonder what ones motivation would be for putting out such an obvioulsly false statement just on it’s face. But beyond that, doesn’t the statement cancel itself out just on a logical or realistic sense? What I mean is, how could or would anyone have taken the time to “pick out” one, two, or three from ,&lt;b&gt;millions&lt;/b&gt;? That would be a numerically impossible undertaking due the the factual volume stated in that that word “millions”.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>itâ€™s hard to pick out even three beautiful writers from the millions of bloggers.</i></p>
<p>I have to wonder what ones motivation would be for putting out such an obvioulsly false statement just on it’s face. But beyond that, doesn’t the statement cancel itself out just on a logical or realistic sense? What I mean is, how could or would anyone have taken the time to “pick out” one, two, or three from ,<b>millions</b>? That would be a numerically impossible undertaking due the the factual volume stated in that that word “millions”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akhenaten</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-83961</link>
		<dc:creator>akhenaten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/28/reliable/#comment-83961</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“Beautiful writing” is, of course, relative. And it is up for discussion how relevant the ability is to finding truth. And isn’t that what the blogs do best? Search for truth? I hope so. I hope that’s what you’re about. That’s why I stop by. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And if that is your cause, then who cares how “beautiful” the writing is? I do not read FDL, atrios, or any other highly-trafficked blog for Beauty. Surprise, surprise. I pick up literature for that.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Beautiful writing” is, of course, relative. And it is up for discussion how relevant the ability is to finding truth. And isn’t that what the blogs do best? Search for truth? I hope so. I hope that’s what you’re about. That’s why I stop by. </p>
<p>And if that is your cause, then who cares how “beautiful” the writing is? I do not read FDL, atrios, or any other highly-trafficked blog for Beauty. Surprise, surprise. I pick up literature for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
