<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Spin That Won&#8217;t Die</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:11:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mitchel Schapira</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-83043</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchel Schapira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-83043</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You are making too much of this, Ms. Smith. You are undoubtedly correct that Fitz did not/would not say that he was going to indict Rove, since this is the province of the Grand Jury. As you point out, he would have to be a moron or a press hog. However, it was Luskin to whom the thought is attributed. He is surely a press hog, and I leave to others the judgment about him being a moron. Moreover, though a prosecutor doesn’t indict, he or she does present charges to the grand jury, who then indict or return a no true bill. (Also known as an ignoramus, for you trivia buffs.) Finally, Luskin was not directly quoted, and the difference upon which you focus is subtle enough that you cannot discout the possibility that it escaped the reporter’s attention. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Visit the Schapira blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://schapira.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;What we know so far &lt;/a&gt;…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“… and tell ‘em Big Mitch sent ya!”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are making too much of this, Ms. Smith. You are undoubtedly correct that Fitz did not/would not say that he was going to indict Rove, since this is the province of the Grand Jury. As you point out, he would have to be a moron or a press hog. However, it was Luskin to whom the thought is attributed. He is surely a press hog, and I leave to others the judgment about him being a moron. Moreover, though a prosecutor doesn’t indict, he or she does present charges to the grand jury, who then indict or return a no true bill. (Also known as an ignoramus, for you trivia buffs.) Finally, Luskin was not directly quoted, and the difference upon which you focus is subtle enough that you cannot discout the possibility that it escaped the reporter’s attention. </p>
<p>Visit the Schapira blog <a href="http://schapira.blogspot.com">What we know so far </a>…</p>
<p>“… and tell ‘em Big Mitch sent ya!”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Des</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-82823</link>
		<dc:creator>Des</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-82823</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just as an aside… It was mentioned that Rove did not initially recall his telephone conversation with Cooper “amid the hundreds of calls” he deals with each day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ok, let’s be conservative and assume “hundreds” means 200 and let’s say each call lasts 3 minutes. This means Karl spends a solid 10 hours a day on the phone. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So how did he get to be so rotund? He doesn’t have time to eat.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as an aside… It was mentioned that Rove did not initially recall his telephone conversation with Cooper “amid the hundreds of calls” he deals with each day.</p>
<p>Ok, let’s be conservative and assume “hundreds” means 200 and let’s say each call lasts 3 minutes. This means Karl spends a solid 10 hours a day on the phone. </p>
<p>So how did he get to be so rotund? He doesn’t have time to eat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symbolman</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-82407</link>
		<dc:creator>Symbolman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-82407</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Christy, love your take on all this, Jane has seen my film “Rove’s War” and posted my “Fitzmas Tree” flash animaton here on the site, just my way of introduction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The “Rove’s War” film is a two DVD set thats a complete Chronology of the Plame outing, spent a year researching it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here’s one take on the situation with Rove that I’ve put forward on another site, I was asked to post it here by another great poster yodermom, thinking it might be a good theory to bring up..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here it is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*****&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ve been doing some more research on the web and I think I can see a solution that answers ALL the issues and even in a way, bails out Mr Leopold..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here’s the scene. Now a Target Letter may not have to be a “letter” at all, tho some kind of agreement may have been reached on paper before today. As folks may recall Fitz met with Luskin AND Rove BEFORE they went into the Grand Jury and had a discussion. There’s a possibility that Fitz gave Rove a “Come to Jesus” speech, which is basically, “Look bud, I OWN YOU.. I’ve got the goods on you, you may as well fess up, plead guilty and co-operate and we’ll see what we can do as far as reducing the sentence..”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now IF according to Leopold there was an Agreement beforehand (maybe on paper), then that letter would “technically” be a “Target Letter”, IE Rove is now a Target, but part of the agreement is that Fitz will allow Luskin to state publicly outside and after the Grand Jury meet that Rove is only a Subject and NOT a Target.. Once Rove has pled GUILTY inside to the COOPER LIES, then he technically is NO LONGER a “Target”, BUT he still had to deal with two subjects SINCE those lies, Vivica Novak, and the 250 emails..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, since he’s pled guilty to the one charge on this visit “Obstruction of Justice”? “Lying to a Grand Jury” whichever.. he’s STILL open to Indictments on these other counts, part of the agreement being to spill his guts, so Fitz can get to the CENTER of the cookie, Bush or Cheney (who can still be btw, charge with “Obstruction of Justice” whether they were under oath or not).. That’s why it’s been reported that Rove, “Doesn’t know if he’ll be Indicted yet..”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He gets to walk out and his lawyer says he’s NOT a Target, as per the deal with Fitz.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which means that the look you saw in one photo, the pucker factor reflecting the other end of this monster’s face was about 9.98.. It is possible that Rove Pled GUILTY YESTERDAY and may STILL BE INDICTED on more charges, or bled some more for info.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hopefully leading to Bush or Cheney. And we may never find out what he copped to, or anything for that matter, a lot of this being done in SECRET, and plenty of conjecture.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ideas? Thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*****&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So , sure, I know the GJ can’t do anything but indict, and I’ve been told that he’s got to be indicted, then judged in open court and all that..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But from the times I’ve been in court I’ve known that it’s a dog and pony show, once everyone has agreed to a plea bargain it’s just rubberstampping a bunch of paper, signatures, etc..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sealing the Indictment would still allow Luskin to walk out of the Grand Jury with Fitz’s approval and say that Rove is still a “SUBJECT” etc, while Rove is singing his lil heart out at each meeeting..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Going to so many meetings has made me thing there MUST be a deal, and there’s a LOT of secrecy going on in any case, being the  Bush admin in the first place..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, there’s my theory, hack away, anyone, but in the end I do think this is possible, and that there may be an anticlimactic end to this, hopefully not a pardon, and we take back both houses and slash and burn all the criminals &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Keep up the great work!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Symbolman co founder of Takebackthemedia.com&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Christy, love your take on all this, Jane has seen my film “Rove’s War” and posted my “Fitzmas Tree” flash animaton here on the site, just my way of introduction.</p>
<p>The “Rove’s War” film is a two DVD set thats a complete Chronology of the Plame outing, spent a year researching it.</p>
<p>Here’s one take on the situation with Rove that I’ve put forward on another site, I was asked to post it here by another great poster yodermom, thinking it might be a good theory to bring up..</p>
<p>Here it is:</p>
<p>*****</p>
<p>I’ve been doing some more research on the web and I think I can see a solution that answers ALL the issues and even in a way, bails out Mr Leopold..</p>
<p>Here’s the scene. Now a Target Letter may not have to be a “letter” at all, tho some kind of agreement may have been reached on paper before today. As folks may recall Fitz met with Luskin AND Rove BEFORE they went into the Grand Jury and had a discussion. There’s a possibility that Fitz gave Rove a “Come to Jesus” speech, which is basically, “Look bud, I OWN YOU.. I’ve got the goods on you, you may as well fess up, plead guilty and co-operate and we’ll see what we can do as far as reducing the sentence..”</p>
<p>Now IF according to Leopold there was an Agreement beforehand (maybe on paper), then that letter would “technically” be a “Target Letter”, IE Rove is now a Target, but part of the agreement is that Fitz will allow Luskin to state publicly outside and after the Grand Jury meet that Rove is only a Subject and NOT a Target.. Once Rove has pled GUILTY inside to the COOPER LIES, then he technically is NO LONGER a “Target”, BUT he still had to deal with two subjects SINCE those lies, Vivica Novak, and the 250 emails..</p>
<p>So, since he’s pled guilty to the one charge on this visit “Obstruction of Justice”? “Lying to a Grand Jury” whichever.. he’s STILL open to Indictments on these other counts, part of the agreement being to spill his guts, so Fitz can get to the CENTER of the cookie, Bush or Cheney (who can still be btw, charge with “Obstruction of Justice” whether they were under oath or not).. That’s why it’s been reported that Rove, “Doesn’t know if he’ll be Indicted yet..”</p>
<p>He gets to walk out and his lawyer says he’s NOT a Target, as per the deal with Fitz.</p>
<p>Which means that the look you saw in one photo, the pucker factor reflecting the other end of this monster’s face was about 9.98.. It is possible that Rove Pled GUILTY YESTERDAY and may STILL BE INDICTED on more charges, or bled some more for info.</p>
<p>Hopefully leading to Bush or Cheney. And we may never find out what he copped to, or anything for that matter, a lot of this being done in SECRET, and plenty of conjecture.</p>
<p>Ideas? Thoughts?</p>
<p>*****</p>
<p>So , sure, I know the GJ can’t do anything but indict, and I’ve been told that he’s got to be indicted, then judged in open court and all that..</p>
<p>But from the times I’ve been in court I’ve known that it’s a dog and pony show, once everyone has agreed to a plea bargain it’s just rubberstampping a bunch of paper, signatures, etc..</p>
<p>Sealing the Indictment would still allow Luskin to walk out of the Grand Jury with Fitz’s approval and say that Rove is still a “SUBJECT” etc, while Rove is singing his lil heart out at each meeeting..</p>
<p>Going to so many meetings has made me thing there MUST be a deal, and there’s a LOT of secrecy going on in any case, being the  Bush admin in the first place..</p>
<p>So, there’s my theory, hack away, anyone, but in the end I do think this is possible, and that there may be an anticlimactic end to this, hopefully not a pardon, and we take back both houses and slash and burn all the criminals </p>
<p>Keep up the great work!</p>
<p>Symbolman co founder of Takebackthemedia.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Parallel Universe</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-81822</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Parallel Universe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-81822</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;SP, CPA and others. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t know why they spin. They remind me of very young children who, when they hide under a blanket really think they are invisible. That lasts till what, 3 or 4?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I (really should use We) believe they are delusional in so many ways, so why not have a delusion that the public will believe that Rover is not a subject or target or whatever so long as he is not indicted or not know publicly to be cooperating; take refuge under their blankie of spin; until Fitz speaks or acts, nothing has happened and all is well, and somehow, the vast majority of Americans will believe it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Silly? Ineffectual? Strange? Dumb? Yeah, since &lt;b&gt;they’ve lost the “Keith Jackson” vote&lt;/b&gt; and so many other constituencies. But, it is all they have. Taking a different tack would lead to admissions regarding the phony evidence used to promote the war, the lies, etc. And that just cuts too deep, so really isn’t available to them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m fine with their strategy b/c I believe that most people don’t get past Bush Administration/Criminal Investigation/National Security. The details don’t matter. The big issue themes are a winner so long as they talk about it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So. Delusion Away.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SP, CPA and others. </p>
<p>I don’t know why they spin. They remind me of very young children who, when they hide under a blanket really think they are invisible. That lasts till what, 3 or 4?</p>
<p>I (really should use We) believe they are delusional in so many ways, so why not have a delusion that the public will believe that Rover is not a subject or target or whatever so long as he is not indicted or not know publicly to be cooperating; take refuge under their blankie of spin; until Fitz speaks or acts, nothing has happened and all is well, and somehow, the vast majority of Americans will believe it.</p>
<p>Silly? Ineffectual? Strange? Dumb? Yeah, since <b>they’ve lost the “Keith Jackson” vote</b> and so many other constituencies. But, it is all they have. Taking a different tack would lead to admissions regarding the phony evidence used to promote the war, the lies, etc. And that just cuts too deep, so really isn’t available to them.</p>
<p>I’m fine with their strategy b/c I believe that most people don’t get past Bush Administration/Criminal Investigation/National Security. The details don’t matter. The big issue themes are a winner so long as they talk about it.</p>
<p>So. Delusion Away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dksbook</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-81817</link>
		<dc:creator>dksbook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-81817</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have been so grateful for Christy’s analysis throughout this whole investigation, and haven’t had anything to add.  But it struck me today with Christy’s reference to “Gold Bars” Luskin, that, really, what sets most of us apart from the Republicans is that they never, ever, run out of money, and this is why they can sustain the 24/7 attack on the Constitution.  Think what could be done with all that money!  Everybody that gets sick could go to the doctor.  Everybody that gets into college could actually go.  We could really tackle our oil dependency.  We could afford the personnel needed to hand-count every vote.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Say, I really like that real-time preview feature!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been so grateful for Christy’s analysis throughout this whole investigation, and haven’t had anything to add.  But it struck me today with Christy’s reference to “Gold Bars” Luskin, that, really, what sets most of us apart from the Republicans is that they never, ever, run out of money, and this is why they can sustain the 24/7 attack on the Constitution.  Think what could be done with all that money!  Everybody that gets sick could go to the doctor.  Everybody that gets into college could actually go.  We could really tackle our oil dependency.  We could afford the personnel needed to hand-count every vote.  </p>
<p>Say, I really like that real-time preview feature!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Parrish, CPA</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-81810</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Parrish, CPA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-81810</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;rwcole says:&lt;br /&gt;
April 27th, 2006 at 8:51 am&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You’ve made some excellent points in your comments. Yes, his bank account needs to be looked into; perhaps that project is already in progress.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The idea for him to step down is a big story.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leads me to EPU’s comments in post 87 above. If Karl has entered into a plea agreement or if he will be indicted, then why all the spin? Although this week’s spin resembles the spin from three or four months ago, I’m wondering if it’s intended for the general public - no, perhaps not now, though that may have been the intent three or four months ago. I think I see what is happening…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rwcole says:<br />
April 27th, 2006 at 8:51 am</p>
<p>You’ve made some excellent points in your comments. Yes, his bank account needs to be looked into; perhaps that project is already in progress.</p>
<p>The idea for him to step down is a big story.</p>
<p>This leads me to EPU’s comments in post 87 above. If Karl has entered into a plea agreement or if he will be indicted, then why all the spin? Although this week’s spin resembles the spin from three or four months ago, I’m wondering if it’s intended for the general public &#8211; no, perhaps not now, though that may have been the intent three or four months ago. I think I see what is happening…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: professor rat</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-81796</link>
		<dc:creator>professor rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 15:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-81796</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When this GOP pack of criminals is run off they may still have a plan to act as spoilers, assassin’s and terrorist’s. A new KKK.&lt;br /&gt;
So we may need to get some of those retired generals back and bring more troops home like it was Little Rock again.&lt;br /&gt;
Just sayin.&lt;br /&gt;
BTW with this media featuring the likes of a red fascist ( Hitchen’s ) and a brownshirt like Ledeen I would say the Military-industrial complex has become the Military- entertainment complex. The anti-trust laws will have to dusted off big time to deal with this menace won’t they?&lt;br /&gt;
Merry Fitzmayday and Fitzo de Mayo.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When this GOP pack of criminals is run off they may still have a plan to act as spoilers, assassin’s and terrorist’s. A new KKK.<br />
So we may need to get some of those retired generals back and bring more troops home like it was Little Rock again.<br />
Just sayin.<br />
BTW with this media featuring the likes of a red fascist ( Hitchen’s ) and a brownshirt like Ledeen I would say the Military-industrial complex has become the Military- entertainment complex. The anti-trust laws will have to dusted off big time to deal with this menace won’t they?<br />
Merry Fitzmayday and Fitzo de Mayo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwcole</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-81791</link>
		<dc:creator>rwcole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 15:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-81791</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Scattered thoughts on the Rove thing:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Could be good news for Rove”- Yeah and the next good news will be that he’s got terminal brain cancer-there’s NO way this is good news for Rove and any reporter who prints that shit without comment deserves to be fired.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rove is not a wealthy guy- he came into the White House with less than a million dollars in assets- and he’s been FHON-ing (feathering his own nest) ever since. The cost of Luskin alone would damned near break him. He wants to spend his golden years runnin with the hot shots- that means at least $10 mm in the bank. He’s vulnerable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The combination job at the White House (politics and policy) was the perfect opportunity to shake down donors. “If you give us this- I’ll get you that- and I am the guy who can do it.”. It also provided a perfect opportunity for nest feathering. Someone needs to look into Karl’s bank account.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Karl knew about the GJ interview at least three weeks ago. It certainly influenced his “demotion”. So whose idea was it for him to step down? There’s a big story there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Karl gets indicted- and convicted- he’s in much worse shape than Libby. Libby has money. Libby can do work that has less high visibility and support himself. Karl only knows politics- and if he’s poison- he can’t make a living.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All of these things have to be spinning around in his mind. His goal has to be to get out of this thing undamaged- both politically and financially. That’s a tall order.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scattered thoughts on the Rove thing:</p>
<p>“Could be good news for Rove”- Yeah and the next good news will be that he’s got terminal brain cancer-there’s NO way this is good news for Rove and any reporter who prints that shit without comment deserves to be fired.</p>
<p>Rove is not a wealthy guy- he came into the White House with less than a million dollars in assets- and he’s been FHON-ing (feathering his own nest) ever since. The cost of Luskin alone would damned near break him. He wants to spend his golden years runnin with the hot shots- that means at least $10 mm in the bank. He’s vulnerable.</p>
<p>The combination job at the White House (politics and policy) was the perfect opportunity to shake down donors. “If you give us this- I’ll get you that- and I am the guy who can do it.”. It also provided a perfect opportunity for nest feathering. Someone needs to look into Karl’s bank account.</p>
<p>Karl knew about the GJ interview at least three weeks ago. It certainly influenced his “demotion”. So whose idea was it for him to step down? There’s a big story there.</p>
<p>If Karl gets indicted- and convicted- he’s in much worse shape than Libby. Libby has money. Libby can do work that has less high visibility and support himself. Karl only knows politics- and if he’s poison- he can’t make a living.</p>
<p>All of these things have to be spinning around in his mind. His goal has to be to get out of this thing undamaged- both politically and financially. That’s a tall order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gryphon</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-81787</link>
		<dc:creator>gryphon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 15:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-81787</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great picture at the head of this thread.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lots of people spinnig like mad and going nowhere. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only hope it’s predictive.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great picture at the head of this thread.</p>
<p>Lots of people spinnig like mad and going nowhere. </p>
<p>Only hope it’s predictive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Parallel Universe</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-81783</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Parallel Universe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 15:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/27/the-spin-that-wont-die/#comment-81783</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Reddhead - If I were a famous blogger with a fine legal mind looking at all things Rover, the perspective I would look at it from is this: If I were representing Pigboy, what would I think is going on and why. I wouldn’t look at it from the prosecution side, just the defense side.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think if you look at it from that perspective, cut out all the CM BS, and just look at the facts regarding the investigation so far and your client’s role in both the events being investigated and the investigation itself, you would come to one of two conclusions - he is already cooperating in exchange for a plea deal, or he will be indicted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But that’s me.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reddhead &#8211; If I were a famous blogger with a fine legal mind looking at all things Rover, the perspective I would look at it from is this: If I were representing Pigboy, what would I think is going on and why. I wouldn’t look at it from the prosecution side, just the defense side.</p>
<p>I think if you look at it from that perspective, cut out all the CM BS, and just look at the facts regarding the investigation so far and your client’s role in both the events being investigated and the investigation itself, you would come to one of two conclusions &#8211; he is already cooperating in exchange for a plea deal, or he will be indicted.</p>
<p>But that’s me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
