<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BREAKING: Back in the Grand Jury Saddle This Morning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:49:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zzyzx</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-81114</link>
		<dc:creator>zzyzx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-81114</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;mx/ot:  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Has there ever been a more appropriate time for King Crimson’s 21st Century Schizoid Man?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mx/ot:  </p>
<p>Has there ever been a more appropriate time for King Crimson’s 21st Century Schizoid Man?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoosierville</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80804</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoosierville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80804</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This was updated on the USA today link:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Update at 4 p.m. ET: CNN’s John King just said Rove is still inside the courthouse. Reporters are outside, “staking out” the exits. King said neither Rove nor his lawyer are expected to speak to the media when they depart.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;King also said that the lawyer, Luskin, released a statement saying Rove testified voluntarily and that Fitzgerald has not decided whether to bring additional charges in connection with the case.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was updated on the USA today link:</p>
<p><b>Update at 4 p.m. ET: CNN’s John King just said Rove is still inside the courthouse. Reporters are outside, “staking out” the exits. King said neither Rove nor his lawyer are expected to speak to the media when they depart.</b></p>
<p>King also said that the lawyer, Luskin, released a statement saying Rove testified voluntarily and that Fitzgerald has not decided whether to bring additional charges in connection with the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emptywheel</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80798</link>
		<dc:creator>emptywheel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80798</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jeff&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Let me put it this way: Iâ€™ve become increasingly convinced that there are some people in DC who serve as sources for some of the stories unfriendly to the White House who, to put it generously, let wishful thoughts mix with their information.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I agree with you here 100%. But I’m not making that claim based on the reports from people who may have been snookered by sources only apparently unfriendly to the WH. As I’ve been saying for months, there is clear evidence someone tampered with evidence relating to Rove’s Cooper conversation (not just the email, but also the phone log). And that we know, from court filings, that Fitzgerald has gotten a new lead on what may be those emails. So I strongly suspect someone will go down because of the crime; it doesn’t have to be Karl. But there is too much evidence to believe it will just be dropped. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Besides, it’s Republican scandal 101. Things really start to get interesting when evidence of their deleted PROFs notes or tapes come forward. We’re at that stage now, I think.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff</p>
<p><i>Let me put it this way: Iâ€™ve become increasingly convinced that there are some people in DC who serve as sources for some of the stories unfriendly to the White House who, to put it generously, let wishful thoughts mix with their information.</i></p>
<p>I agree with you here 100%. But I’m not making that claim based on the reports from people who may have been snookered by sources only apparently unfriendly to the WH. As I’ve been saying for months, there is clear evidence someone tampered with evidence relating to Rove’s Cooper conversation (not just the email, but also the phone log). And that we know, from court filings, that Fitzgerald has gotten a new lead on what may be those emails. So I strongly suspect someone will go down because of the crime; it doesn’t have to be Karl. But there is too much evidence to believe it will just be dropped. </p>
<p>Besides, it’s Republican scandal 101. Things really start to get interesting when evidence of their deleted PROFs notes or tapes come forward. We’re at that stage now, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: looseheadprop</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80783</link>
		<dc:creator>looseheadprop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80783</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How reliable is TruthOut?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A target letter is HUGE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A target letter is… &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DO THE HAPPY DANCE TIME  !!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Godesses, I need some divine guidance. Do I put my faith in TruthOut?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How reliable is TruthOut?</p>
<p>A target letter is HUGE.</p>
<p>A target letter is… </p>
<p>DO THE HAPPY DANCE TIME  !!!</p>
<p>Godesses, I need some divine guidance. Do I put my faith in TruthOut?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMinNY</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80706</link>
		<dc:creator>MMinNY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80706</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Story’s up at truthout. . .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/042606I.shtml&quot;&gt;http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/042606I.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Story’s up at truthout. . .</p>
<p><a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/042606I.shtml">http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/042606I.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80693</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80693</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“Raw Story has been wrong many times in covering this story. Absolutely no credibility.”&lt;br /&gt;
The only thing I know they got wrong was that Rove was not indicted in the first round.  But just about everyone got that wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anything else you can think of?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Raw Story has been wrong many times in covering this story. Absolutely no credibility.”<br />
The only thing I know they got wrong was that Rove was not indicted in the first round.  But just about everyone got that wrong.</p>
<p>Anything else you can think of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Forde</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80689</link>
		<dc:creator>John Forde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80689</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I read somewhere that Fitz had SEIZED hard drives from administration computers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there any documentation to this?&lt;br /&gt;
How do you get a search warrant to search the Executive Offices? If it’s true, when this is over, that petition is going in the Smithsonian.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read somewhere that Fitz had SEIZED hard drives from administration computers. </p>
<p>Is there any documentation to this?<br />
How do you get a search warrant to search the Executive Offices? If it’s true, when this is over, that petition is going in the Smithsonian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimster</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80687</link>
		<dc:creator>kimster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80687</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Raw Story has been wrong many times in covering this story.  Absolutely no credibility.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raw Story has been wrong many times in covering this story.  Absolutely no credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80685</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80685</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Raw Story is reporting Rove received target letter- details to follow.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raw Story is reporting Rove received target letter- details to follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/26/breaking-back-in-the-grand-jury-saddle-this-morning/#comment-80679</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;emptywheel - Are you really that confident that there is a story to the lost emails, and that Rove led Fitzgerald to them?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let me put it this way: I’ve become increasingly convinced that there are some people in DC who serve as sources for some of the stories unfriendly to the White House who, to put it generously, let wishful thoughts mix with their information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;But I also donâ€™t see why you bring Rove before the GJ just to close the case.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe you’re right.  But I could imagine Fitzgerald both wanting to get Rove under oath to tell his part of the VNovak-Luskin-Rove story, and wanting to run things by the grand jury, if only out of respect for it as the final judge on what to do.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>emptywheel &#8211; Are you really that confident that there is a story to the lost emails, and that Rove led Fitzgerald to them?</p>
<p>Let me put it this way: I’ve become increasingly convinced that there are some people in DC who serve as sources for some of the stories unfriendly to the White House who, to put it generously, let wishful thoughts mix with their information.</p>
<p><i>But I also donâ€™t see why you bring Rove before the GJ just to close the case.</i></p>
<p>Maybe you’re right.  But I could imagine Fitzgerald both wanting to get Rove under oath to tell his part of the VNovak-Luskin-Rove story, and wanting to run things by the grand jury, if only out of respect for it as the final judge on what to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
