
Oh how very sad when the trials of war (you know, the one everyone hates) separate true love.
Joementum promised to show up once a month on Hannity's show, but he's been AWOL for the past two months. Why could that be? And when Mike Stark has called in to the show, Hannity cuts him off at the very mention of his paramour's name. Well Mike is not giving up; he's got a week-long push to put the question to Hannity and force him to make an honest woman out of Holy Joe. It's the least we can do, so please go give Mike a "recommend" and help him out at Kos.
Meanwhile there is a very good article on Ned Lamont in the New Haven Register (via My Left Nutmeg):
Only six weeks into his official campaign against the three-term senator, Lamont says he is more than an antiwar candidate, as he talked about his objections to the country’s energy plan he said was written by industry lobbyists and subsidizes drilling by Exxon-Mobil, a policy backed by Lieberman.
"It was wrong for New England and I think wrong for the country," Lamont said.
Lamont said he was also moved to oppose Lieberman around invasion of privacy issues represented by the Terri Schiavo case and warrantless wiretaps advocated by President Bush.
Lieberman has said he does not want to scold the president for what has happened in the past, "but I think you should hold people accountable."
He said rules already in place allow national security wiretaps with court approval.
"You can’t unilaterally just go ahead and say I’m going to interpret the laws as I see fit," he said of Bush. Lamont also backs the censure resolution against the president.
And over at Kos there is a very good diary by Sun Tzu about Ned's appearance at a party for Markos and Jerome last week; I admit I don't know who it is that wrote the post but I was there and the description of Ned is quite apt:
I imagine most are familiar with the phrase `fire in the belly' when it comes to candidates for public office. It's a shorthand way of saying a potential candidate has the gumption, the oomph, the stamina, the willpower, the fortitude, the guts to make the run and endure the endless campaigning, attacks, handshaking, baby-kissing, yadda, yadda. And while fire in the belly is a necessary component of a successful candidate's make-up, no question, it also has the element of a charging bull to it. A candidate with fire in the belly might, figuratively speaking, run into a brick wall. Repeatedly.
In my experience, though, fire in the belly is not the crucial aspect of candidate assessment. It's Fire In The Eyes, baby. Fire In The Eyes means a candidate is on a Mission. Yes, from God, as the Blues Brothers told us. Fire In The Eyes is about strategic smarts and `no mercy'. It means a candidate will see the kill shot in a campaign when it opens up and take it without hesitation. Fire In The Eyes means a candidate knows he/she is the `right thing to do' for voters in the election and the other(s) are not. It has elements of intensity, of justice, of understanding campaign reality and, most importantly, Fire In The Eyes combines the elements of: a) recognizing absolute and total political combat is coming with b) the determintion to prevail under any and all circumstances.
Ned Lamont has Fire In The Eyes, folks. I have no doubt whatsoever about this. He needs a little `spit polish' here and there, but he's ready and he's in it to win. We talked a lot about strategy, positioning and the political environment, the zeitgeist. I'm not going to go in great detail here because that gives too much information to Joementum and his flacks. However, Ned understands what he's up against and he understands better how to navigate and what to execute campaign-wise. He's beginning to see potential kill shots, he's locating them on his radar now, getting targeting coordinates. He knows he must be fearless, relentless. He's seeing the campaign from a more strategic and psychological view.
His messaging may take a turn, a good one, look for it. It will be about pressure, if it happens. Squeeeeezing Joementum. Ever increasing, unrelenting pressure. Merciless execution to draw out Joementum's `real self' for public display. "Tell the truth, Ned. Give the people the truth", I said to him. He's 10-4, roger wilco on that.
The Lamont campaign is a very serious campaign and inch by inch they are gaining ground on a terrified Lieberman, who is too frightened of Fearless Leader's 24% approval rating in Connecticut to go spooning with his girlfriend Hannity.
You can contribute to Lamont here .
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


RSS/XML Feed
Fitzzzzzzzz. Hi Jane!
With Lamont doing so well and mounting such a growing, boat-rocking threat to an established do-nothing Democrat like Lieberman, I’m surprised that the other Democratic big-wigs haven’t yet run Lamont out of town on a rail, the way they did to Paul Hackett out in Ohio.
Hi Angie.
Uh… Clem.: I think the online response to the Hackett rail is what is keeping them from doing so. Plus I don’t think many have been wild about the knives Lieberman consistently throws in the party’s back. They may not say so out loud but it’s my general impression many would not be saddened by Lieberman’s replacement by just about anyone with a “D” next to their name.
Its awesome how well Ned is doing, and a reminder that for a Democratic retake of the Congress to be meaningful, it must be retaken by real democrats, politicians who will stand up in the face of the dire situation our Republic is in, rather than nodding factotum placeholders like Lieberman and his supporter, Barack Obama, representing the state where I live.
Well, it looks like he’s got a job if he loses to Lamont. They could call it “Hannity and Lieberman”. If you can go from FOX News flunkie to Bush spokesman, I don’t see why you shouldn’t be able to go from Bush spokesman to FOX News flunkie.
Sean Hannity and Michael Reagan Try To Blame Liberals For High Gas Prices
Reported by Ellen - April 25, 2006Hannity’s face was in the bullyboy squint and he jabbed his finger as he spoke to “Democratic strategist†Bob Beckel. “I want YOU to know, Bob Beckel, I give blame for high gas prices. 30 years of the Democrats beholden to the extreme environmental movement, we haven’t built a refinery. We’re not allowed to drill in the 48 states or off the coast of Florida or California. We can’t drill in ANWR. We can’t do anything… Government taxes are 62 cents a gallon in New York for gasoline. The gas companies only get 9 cents a gallon. I blame you liberals for this.â€
http://www.newshounds.us/2006/.....prices.php
You know, for some reason when reading this a possible Democratic “slogan” or very brief statement of principle popped into my head. Maybe it’s because, to me, the Schiavo case is a crystal-clear metaphor for how the two parties approach individual liberty. The Republicans want to control every aspect of your living and dying. The Democrats want to give you the respect and honor of living your own life, in your own way, without undue interference.
When asked what Democrats stand for, the answer should be:
“The Dignity of the Person.”
Democrats are pro-democracy, because only in a democracy can each individual pursue their life in their own way.
Democrats are pro-choice because it is up to each woman, not the State, to control her own body.
Democrats are pro-Constitution, because in a nation where the Executive wields unilateral, unimpedable power in an unending state of war, individual liberty and dignity is impossible.
Democrats are pro-environment, because it is impossible for people to have dignity and to pursue their own course in a world befouled by pollution.
Democrats are pro-alternative-energy, because being beholden to overseas oil interests forces us to surrender our ideals in pursuit of energy.
Don’t know why all that came from this article, but there it is.
Jane- this is the link to the article you posted recently- night before last? Well worth a read, it was. Fer sure. http://www.courant.com/news/lo.....451.column
Intrigued by this
===Watching, but decidedly not orchestrating, these bloggers is a 46-year-old Leprachaunish-looking Wall Street refugee with a puffy graying beard. His name is Aldon Hynes. He “lives on the web,” as he puts it. Sixteen hours a day, scouring sites, writing comments. As an official Lamont staffer, he finds donors and volunteers nationwide on sites like dailykos.com (another source of priceless yet free Lamont help).
Hynes believes the blogosphere is reviving democracy by enabling everyday people to participate in politics on their own terms. ===
Any knowledge of this guy? Aldon Hynes? The comment partly made me wonder if he’d been at FDL under another name.
Uh…Clem. 2, I’m sure they’d like to. But Connecticut is no Ohio, and Lamont is no Hackett. Not only is he a stronger all-around candidate (and I say that as someone who liked Hackett and sent him money), he has his own deep pockets to fall back on if Rahm and company try to bully his contributors.
OT: Loved Bush’s idea of “relaxing” environmental restrictions on gas companies in order to reduce gas prices. I always think the man can’t get any sleazier, and he always manages to surprise me. Any word on how the latest Pat Roberts coverup is going?
OT..
Shrub’s pal, Kenny Lay (Enron) evidently suffers delusions similar to that of Shrub himself. Lay testified today that “We thought The Wall Street Journal was on a witch hunt against Andy Fastow and maybe Enron,” Lay said. “It was absolutely destroying the confidence of investors at a time when we think we’re doing well.”
Doing well? He can’t seriously believe this.
OT but funny– looks like Ricky Sanatorium may, just may, have outed himself…..
>>>>>>
Tuesday, April 25. 2006
Ah, the Good Old Days
Rick Santorum recently addressed students at North Catholic High School in Pittsburgh and said something that we found very interesting. Rick was telling the students that when he was growing up he didn’t live close enough to a Catholic high school to attend one. But that’s not what we found interesting, what was interesting was when Rick said this, “So, I didn’t go to a Catholic high school when I was living in Pennsylvania.” (emphasis ours)
http://santorumexposed.com/ser.....-Days.html
OT - AP is reporting that consumer confidence is way up, highest in four years. WTF?
Uh…clem — Jane (as usual) is right on the money. People I know in the state D party (former Congressional representatives, et al)are seriously rooting for Ned — they can’t yet turn on Joe (sake of party unity and all that) and because they know if Joe were to win, he would absolutely punish anyone who was behind Ned publicly, and that could hurt the state at large. You see, they really care about what happens here, unlike Joe.
I don’t think there is a big-time D in the state who wouldn’t vote for Ned in the private voting booth, and be thrilled to keep the seat while getting rid of Joe.
And remember, all those rich Ds who think like Rs will be on Cape Cod, Nantucket or the Vinyard in August when the primary vote is held — us poor working stiffs here in the heat and humidity will be turning out for this one.
Angie-
I don’t get it.
Jane -
That. Was. Hilarious.
Glorfindel-
They mean confidence that Bush will screw up again.
“Uh… Clem.: I think the online response to the Hackett rail is what is keeping them from doing so. Plus I don’t think many have been wild about the knives Lieberman consistently throws in the party’s back. They may not say so out loud but it’s my general impression many would not be saddened by Lieberman’s replacement by just about anyone with a “D†next to their name.”
Hi Jane!
Yeah, I really have been hoping lately that this is the case. Above all, I hope that they’ve learned their lesson after the response to what they did to Hackett. The Democratic Party hasn’t needed vibrant new blood this badly for quite awhile, and they simply cannot afford to chase off folks like Hackett and Lamont (who, I’m really glad to see, is apparently not under the Democratic Good Ol’ Boy network’s guns.)
I tend to also think you’re right about the Democrats kind of having had it to friggin’ -here- with Lieberman’s backstabbing. At least I hope they have. Watching the blogosphere rip their hair out at the Democrats’ seeming inability to get their act together is often like watching Basil Fawlty try and explain something basic to Manuel the waiter.
“Clean the windows!”
“Green…?”
“Oh, God, I could spend the rest of my LIFE having this conversation… Look, please try and understand before one of us DIES.”
Oy… it’s worse than being a damned Cubs fan, I’m telling ya! ;^)
Oh! Just looked again at the graphic. Brilliant- Hannity & Colmes… sentenced to 12 yrs in prison… Jane, you are sly.
Sean Hannity is almost as repulsive as his mentor Rush.
Female caller with thick Southern twang: “Hi Sean, I just wanted to let y’all know that I think you’re a great American and I thank the Lord for what you do.”
Sean (earnestly): “Thank you Emma Jean and you’re also a great American. Libruls…blah…terror…blah…Democrats…blech!”
It’s like a fascism ho-down. No, seriously.
AirAmerica, can you do something about that signal strength, these people are killing me.
Angie -
I got it.
Where’s Curt Weldon when you need him?
Matt O-
Explain it to slow me.
rwcole and john casper -
left an EPU’d link downstairs on ethanol- Survey/Study put together by National Resources Defense Council
Hi Jane, love the line under the graphic - in our dreams !!!
ccmask, great link. Dems have to turn this around on them. Hannity and the WH want an even bigger trade imbalance than we already have. Hannity and the WH want to export jobs to oil producing countries.
Frank Probst, lots on the prior thread about your fine comment. Also, IIRC, you wrote your alma mater, William and Mary about the honor code and Xerox Ben. Did you ever get a satisfactory reply?
Tonight I’ll be videotaping Ned’s appearance at the Monroe Democratic Town Committee meeting, and tomorrow I’ll be at the big statewide petition drive kickoff in Norwalk.
Lamont’s campaign is getting some really great press here in Conn. and nationwide lately, and the blogosphere is making a difference in how the MSM is covering it.
Keep it coming, Jane!
(and…Woohoo, I didn’t miss a Lieberman thread for a change!)
OT — my husband said he’s heard that under the radar the Bushies are putting in place the revival of the draft/selective service boards/the whole shebang. All war all the time? Anything to this?
and OT — Whenever the AP or ny other media types hype the great economy for the Bush admin [abetting, not enabling!] one has to ask: what’s your frickin’ yardstick? And what does that have to do with people in the Real World?
ot, but this is hugely interesting:
“Wall Street wants change” on issues such as the Iraq war and the budget deficit, said James Torrey, chairman of the Torrey Funds, which manages about $1 billion. “I’m finding people who are registered Republicans who are saying to me, `what can I do to help?”’
….
The Iraq war and ethics problems among congressional and executive-branch Republicans have helped drive President George W. Bush’s public approval ratings to the lowest point of his presidency. That has spurred donations to Democrats, said Orin Kramer, general partner of Boston Provident Partners LP in New York and a longtime Democratic fund-raiser.
`Party With No Power’
“When the party with no power can raise more money than the party with all the power, it means people are pretty disturbed about the country’s condition,” Kramer said.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/.....;refer=us#
Cathy -
Santorum said “when I was living in Pennsylvania,” as if to say he doesn’t live there now - the state he represents in the Senate.
But if the cause be not good, the King himself hath a
heavy reckoning to make when all those legs and arms and heads,chopp’d off in a battle, shall join together at the latter day and cry all ‘We died at such a place’- some swearing, some crying for a surgeon, some upon their wives left poor behind them, some upon the debts they owe, some upon their children rawly left. I amafeard there are few die well that die in a battle; for how can they charitably dispose of anything when blood is their argument? Now, if these men do not die well, it will be a black matter for the King that led them to it; who to disobey were
against all proportion of subjection.
King Henry V
William Shakespeare
…one more thing…
I can think of a bunch of things that “BFFs” can stand for other than the obvious, but I’ve decided to take the high road for a change…don’t get used to me being like this, though. :)
cathy @ 15– he may have just given credence to the notion that has been floating about that he does not live in PA. Read more here:
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04324/414066.stm
#6: Government taxes are 62 cents a gallon in New York for gasoline. The gas companies only get 9 cents a gallon.
Lessee…federal tax 18.4c/gal. NY is charging 43c/gal in taxes? CA is only taking 18.
That leaves (after the 1 to 2 c/gal that the station nets) … about $2.50/gal for the distributor, the refiner, and the producer to divide. Which makes me wonder if what Hannity and Reagan really mean is that the profit for the oilcos is about 9c/gal.
And as far as drilling off the coasts of CA and Florida - those are limited-access (vertical coastline), protected, or tourist areas for the most part. Which Hannity and Reagan should know.
Weird- quite a few comments at the end of the last thread seem to have vanished- ~ starting with mine with link to gas Bush index. cbl missing in that group. Anyone else having this problem? Matt O. missing too etc.
Nat Hentoff has an interesting take on the Supremes, of Court fame.
http://www.villagevoice.com/ne.....883,6.html
Looks like Kennedy is the new O’Connor. If only Roberts turns out to be a Souter.
-GSD
cbl, thanks a lot. I also appreciated your comment about the “imprimatur” of NRDC. I am a “babe in the woods,†on these issues, so such comments are very helpful.
This is definetely OT but I wanted to reference this op ed piece by Zbigniew Brzezinski in today’s Herald Tribune…
http://www.iht.com/bin/print_i.....edzbig.php
A must read!!
V.G.
Let me check.
great link bkny, thanks.
angie and Matt O-
OK. I guess I think of the senators as living in DC but I know they split their time in both places.
Geez..the reason why I posted #29 was because I had just finished reading this story from http://barkbarkwoofwoof.blogspot.com/
OTTAWA — The media will be banned from CFB Trenton today when the bodies of four Canadian soldiers killed over the weekend in Afghanistan return home.
The decision to mirror a practice that is controversial in the United States follows an announcement on Sunday that the flag on the Peace Tower will not be flown at half-mast to mark the deaths.
V.G.
It looks the same to me. Or at least exactly how it did before I knew there was a new thread.
Perhaps Santorum is spending too much time at K-Street that he gets confused on his legal residence…
Ot
Do not let them say it can’t be done and cheaply.
156 mpg car built with off the shelf parts.
http://www.loremo.com/index_en.php
Matt O. LOL, but really this cannot be good for him. If you check the op ed I linked to, the citizens of PA paid for his kids’ education and there’s more…
Matt O.- okay, I just refreshed that thread for the umpteenth time, and the comments were back.
Bustednuckles,
I’d trade in my Honda for that baby. 156mpg? The Big Oil CEO’s would be apoplectic. We must start buying them :)
OT - dang, Jane Jacobs died.
I agree with the negative opinions about Lieberman and the positive opinions about Lamont. I agree wholeheartedly that Democrats have not exploited the countless failings of the current administration. Nevertheless, I am cautious about the “Fire in the eyes” idea.
Read this (from above): “Fire In The Eyes means a candidate is on a Mission. Yes, from God, as the Blues Brothers told us. Fire In The Eyes is about strategic smarts and `no mercy’. It means a candidate will see the kill shot in a campaign when it opens up and take it without hesitation. Fire In The Eyes means a candidate knows he/she is the `right thing to do’ for voters in the election and the other(s) are not.” Now ask yourself whether George Bush would fit. I think he would and so I would be cautious about using these words and these ideas to support Lamont.
I feel so dumb. I tried, I really did.
Blatantly foolish f***ers?
Boring Fox Freaks?
Badly Featured Foxters?
Bland Floundering Fools?
Bungling Fox flunkies?
What are BFF’s?
wish I weren’t too old for roller skates.
“What are BFF’s?”
Best Friend Forever.
Zennurse–I feel so lame and prissy–
Best Friends Forever?
Santorum and dirty, dirty money are BFFs.
I think one has to determine when a person has fire in the eyes in order to decide whether it’s a good thing or not. Bush probably only has it when he’s riffing on the rapture…think about how often he looks like someone turned out the lights (that could be the tranquilizers), how he can look completely disengaged, unable to put together two consecutive coherent sentences, stuck in that Beavis and Butthead heh-heh-heh thing, jaw tic’ing away…
zennurse -
umm, hate to suggest this but:
butt-f***ing friends?
btw, I’m gay, so no scorn please. :-)
OfT: just pulled this off the WaPoo’s blog:
“….
I was thinking maybe a May Day snark hunt.
Or — even more elusive than the snark — how about a hunt for
Deborah Howell’s job description?
Jim Brady’s integity?
Fred Hiatt’s brain?
Len Downie’s outrage?
Don Graham’s balls?
Or we could organize a field trip along the editorial page/news division firewall … just to see if it could be scaled.
Posted by: AJ | April 25, 2006 10:10 AM”
Jim
Church LadyBrady has abandoned the blog. The WaPoo doesn’t respond to comments and they don’t clear them either. If you want to sell something, Jim’s paying for the space.Bustedknuckles -
If I could paraphrase Chris Rock from his 2000 stand-up:
We could, but they “gotta get ya on the comeback” (when he was talking about health care)
Tsk, tsk Joe. You should know what every one of the not-male gender knows: your status depends on the man who chooses you. It’s a very simple equation. Take Hannity’s arm,so the door doesn’t hit you on the way out, because the Frenchmen & women of CT are onto your double agent status.
OT.
GAO says that many more than “4″ Iraqi provinces are unstable.
The general Bushco line is “4 of 18 provinces” are stable.
(Snip)
http://www.wpherald.com/storyv.....4320-7448r
Also, notice the size of Al ANbar province, that one province is about one third of Iraq. K
Lieberman has said he does not want to scold the president for what has happened in the past, “but I think you should hold people accountable.”
How much in the past are we talking about? Two days? What’s the Lieberman statute of limitaations?
Wikipedia on Jane Jacobs
Oh, and here I am, miss prissy herself, giving this all kinds of nasty and nefarious definitions. I think either one works in context, and thanks; been a long time since I signed anyone’s yearbook.
Listened to Talk of the Nation with Batiste and another Gen (active duty) as well as Kerry. Kerry was kind of scattered, the generals were wonderful. The calls were supportive of the gens, one woman whose husband and son in the military was nearly weeping as she thanked them for coming out about the betrayal of the “boots on the ground” military who feel as they do but can’t speak out. Talk of theNation replays throughout the evening, if you want to catch it, go to
PublicRadioFan
just refresh for up to date listings
The ‘middle’ third way: BOY Freinds 4EVAH!
If Brady’s left the comments ’swinging in the wind’ could be ‘that’s all she wrote’ (’Turn out the lights, the parteeeeze ooooovvveeeeeeerrr’) Or, could be ‘maintanence’.
Can’t you just see those crazy guys doing the macarena at their commitment ceremony?
Pacha -
Now I do, and I am scarred forever. Thanks…
From Drudge: Gas Price Map
Pachacutec-
yeah, but it’ll never last.
damn…memory modules…’TWISTING in the wind’ was what it should be…
Glorfindel: Yeah, the fight over who gets to keep the dogs will be ugly.
Cathy 39
Sanitarium lives in a McMansion near Leesburg in Loudoun Co., Va, the local answer to 90210.
He lives there full time with his wife and kids who are home schooled. Ricky tried, but failed, to get some kind of Pa. state grant to subsidize this when his cover was blown and he had to go to ground.
It’s actually pretty funny that the caption under Hannity & Lieberman reads “will be sentenced to 12 years in prison.” I hope that’s more prophetic than the infamous “terror alerts.”
Senator Pat Roberts is determined to push back the meaningful elements of Bush White House complicity into the Iraq War beyond the 2006 elections by splitting up “phrase two” into more fragments, writes Josh Marshall.
“Tonight on Hardball, Tyler Drumheller, the former top man for the CIA in Europe,
sits down for an exclusive cable interview to discuss his claim that the White
House cherry-picked intelligence about Saddam Hussein’s weapons capability to
make the case for the war in Iraq.”
Would someone please, PLEASE, PRETTY F***ING PLEASE ask Lieberman exactly how he thinks he’s going to hold Bush “accountable”?
Is he going to let Bush stick his tongue *ALL* the way down his throat next time they kiss? “Oh, okay, George, I’m only letting you get to second base, because you screwed up again! But remember, next time, a little more foreplay? Please? Well, we can talk about it later…”
I love this.
From an interview with Lewis Lapham.
“We also need an awakening on the part of large numbers of people, both Democrat and Republican, of a political consciousness that has been dormant for the better part of the last thirty years. We have to change the notion that politics isn’t important, that what’s important is the economy and money, and that politicians serve at the pleasure of their corporate sponsors. They might as well be hired accordion players at a hospitality tent at a golf tournament.”
force him to make an honest woman out of Holy Joe.
They don’t call him JoeBlow for no good reason.
new thread: Lotus 1,2,3….
BLAMING THE ENVIRONMENTALISTS FOR HIGH GAS PRICES IS SUCH A LAME JOKE that the media will likely fall for it, hook, line and sinker.
The truth is, the oil industry has been shutting down refineries to DRIVE up price as their own memos prove:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/....._6980.html
Jamie Court Jamie Court
Bio
Blog Index RSS
09.07.2005
Memos Show Oil Companies Closed Refineries To Hike Profits
If you believe the oil industry’s response to Katrina, you’d think demanding environmentalists are to blame for $3 per gallon gasoline because the tree huggers shut down refineries with tough new rules. President Bush even mimicked the industry excuse by waiving environmental standards in the wake of Katrina. Well, the industry’s own internal memos show the intentional shrinking of American refinery capacity in the 1990s was the oil companies’ own idea to pump up profits.
Take this internal Texaco strategy memo: “[T]
Looks like the Bush White House does background checks just as well as Jim Brady at the Washington Post does.
We’re not allowed to drill in the 48 states or off the coast of Florida or California.
Hannity is certifiable. Of course we drill in the “48 states”?????? Maybe not in the middle of Deleware street, but he’s nuts. Offshore or not, ANWAR or not, we don’t have reserves TO develop that are commensurate with our consumption. Hannity’s allegiance to fossil fuels development as the drillout of our problems is plain stupid.
Lieberman claims he does not want to: “scold the president for what has happened in the past.â€
Similar to the espionage free-pass and criminality double standard for Republicans, Lieberman subjects a contemptuous double standard of his warped subjective morality to members of our team. Who can forget his self-absorbed “scolding†of President Clinton?
I vividly recall Joe sanctimoniously attacking Bill Clinton on the Senate floor, while the President was in Ireland on a follow-up trip to the critical role President Clinton played in helping to bring about the negotiated peaceful settlement of the centuries old conflict in Ulster.
The Good Friday peace agreement was a triumph of U.S. foreign policy, presidential leadership, and an example of what courage and strength in foreign policy really looks like. For Lieberman, however, it was an opportunity (in addition to “scolding the president for what happened in the pastâ€) to selfishly tarnish the role the U.S. and our President played in one of the proudest moments in modern Irish history.
At a time when President Clinton was continuing to play a crucial role in helping to build a safer and more secure future in Ireland, Joe Lieberman’s signature contribution to the public good was to go down (so to speak) on the Senate floor and whip himself into a career defining passionate lather over someone else’s blowjob. Lieberman’s calculated undercutting of President Clinton’s role in helping to build a better future in Ireland highlights Lieberman’s core lack of decency when it comes to the very essence of public service.
Maith thú Ned Lamont!
sláinte
cl
Can’t you make your point without the homophobia?
i remain mystified by ms. hamsher’s predilection for calling men she doesn’t like women, e.g. joe l. it’s so boringly men’s locker room, dear.
Dammit I can’t remember my old New Haven girlfriend’s name. Hope I’m not turnin’ queer.
She had a mentally retarded brother…but it wasn’t Joementum. I’ll have to sleep on it.
Love you Jane.
Free winkie committee,
I am always a little conflicted about that. For instance, as a woman I am always appalled at myself when I find myself voicing sexist stuff. On the other hand, sometimes the racist, sexist, homophobic attitudes of the I-hate-women-who-are-know-it-alls Tom Delays gets so much, that I feel that I enjoy the patriotboy satire because it brings attention to the stuff that most people want to seem to ignore. That’s actually one of the things I like about FDL: that there’s a willingness to confront the baggage and windbags that infect our society. I see this post as kinda teasing Joe for his right-wingish tendancies.
I really think Ned is a great guy, But I don’t think this is the time, nor place for a all out battle between the democrats in CT. When the democrats have a majority in the house and senate, then we clean house.
No offense Dominick, but progressives really can’t afford to have a fake Democrat in the house who sticks his knife in our backs when oh say, there’s another nomination for another Alito. It’s not a battle between Democrats. It’s a battle to prevent the U.S. from becoming coathanger country. For starters.