
(guest blog by Taylor Marsh)
Well, so much for making us safer and forget about "mission accomplished." Oh, I guess what President Bush meant to say is that he didn't care about the rest of the world, including the Iraqis, as long as the bombs were blazing "over there." How Christian of you, brother Bush. Next week will begin the last 1000 days of George W. Bush's presidency. I'm starting to feel safer already.
Last year the Bush administration calculated the number of terrorism incidences in a manner that was not significantly broad, so in the middle of it they changed their calculus. However, it only revealed the absurdity of Bush and Rummy's rationalization for fighting the "war on terror," which basically amounted to the who cares who dies as long as it's not on American soil strategy. According to Knight Ridder, over half of the fatalities in the rise in terrorist attacks came from Iraq. The death toll does not include combat deaths of U.S. soldiers, Iraqis and anyone else involved in the Iraq war.
The Republican party foreign policy is completely bankrupt. It lies in a heap in the Iraqi desert.
The number of terrorist attacks documented by U.S. intelligence agencies jumped sharply in 2005, crossing the 10,000 mark for the first time, according to U.S. counterterrorism officials and documents obtained by Knight Ridder Newspapers.
Officials caution that much of the increase, due to be reported publicly next week, stems from a change last year in how terror attacks are counted, coupled with a more aggressive effort to tally such violence worldwide.
But the documents say, and officials confirm, that some of the rise is traceable to the war in Iraq, where foreign terrorists, a homegrown insurgency and sectarian strife have all contributed to political bloodshed.
The other problem with the Bush foreign policy failures is that while we're fighting the war in Iraq, other terrorist groups have been able to cement regional fiefdoms. In addition, terrorist groups are not only more independent, but have branched off into "micro-groups." These terrorists are also involved in cyberspace now, something that Richard Clarke warned our government about over a decade ago, when he was President Clinton's terrorism czar, a cabinet level position at the time.
However, the minute George W. Bush came into office, he and his Cold War warriors demoted Mr. Clarke and made his former terrorism czar position a basic staff level post, ignored his warnings, then didn't bother to meet with him until the day before 9/11. For his apology to the 9/11 families, Mr. Clarke was swiftboated by the Republicans, while Ken doll Sean Hannity continues to repeat the ridiculous Republican talking point that Bill Clinton was offered Osama.
The United States and its allies have mounted an intense military and diplomatic assault on terrorist havens, which include Somalia, the trans-Sahara in North Africa, and the Sulu Sea in Southeast Asia.
While that effort has had some success, officials say they're alarmed about a new haven: cyberspace, which terrorists are using for recruitment, propaganda and even training.
The annual tally of terrorist attacks has drawn intense scrutiny in recent years, in part because of a series of embarrassing and controversial incidents.
In April 2004, the State Department issued a report for calendar year 2003 that incorrectly stated that significant terrorist attacks had declined from the year before. In fact, the number of attacks had risen, but the report failed to include major attacks at the end of 2003. (source)
Larry Johnson disagrees with how the Bush administration is defining terrorism. However, I would say that's the least of our problems, as long as George W. Bush is in office and the Republican party's bankrupt foreign policy and national security strategeries are the order of the day.
Login Here
Share This
Spotlight



Support this site!
Keep
up with news
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
Advanced search


RSS/XML Feed
Fitz?
Fitz ‘em fast and hard!
Wow!
Kitt
mommybrain is wicked … in a good way !
Rethug marketing 101: Tightly package the codpiece.
just saw this at salon.com:
Former CIA official: White House ignored Iraq intel
Here we go again.
Tyler Drumheller, the CIA’s former top man in Europe, tells CBS News that the White House ignored intelligence in the run-up to the Iraq war. Drumheller says former CIA Director George Tenet told the president and the vice president that Iraq’s foreign minister, with whom U.S. spies had struck a deal, was saying that Saddam Hussein had no active WMD program.
The news fell on deaf ears, Drumheller says.
“The [White House] group that was dealing with preparation for the Iraq war came back and said they were no longer interested,” he tells “60 Minutes.” “And we said, ‘Well, what about the intel?’ And they said, ‘Well, this isn’t about intel anymore. This is about regime change.’”
Drumheller…the drums of war…they can all go to hell
Happy Earth(a Kitt) Day
Amen, moeman.
Throw the motherfitzer’s out
Caped Cod
I’ve never understood how his “attack them over there so we don’t fight here” line has ever survived. It should have been greeted with absolute dersion.
It is morally repulsive to make the innocent civilians pay in blood for such a policy.
And it doesn’t actually prevent the terrorists from attacking wherever they choose. We’ve seen them do their worst outside of Iraq, haven’t we?
And frankly, America has been hit at home repeatedly by the terrorists. The nature of a terrorist fight is to inflict the maximum negative psychological effect with the minimum amount of materiel and personnel.
All that has to happen is for a transcript of Osama to appear on the airways and politicans and the talking heads will bleat repeatedly for Americans to be very afraid and offer up the American way of life on the altar of Bush’s and PNAC’s fantasies of world domination.
America wasn’t destroyed on 911, but the fifth columnists have been working night and day ever since, to finish the job that was started on that day.
From the previous thread;
Anne #83 and all fellow Marylanders.If you would be interested in joining the grass roots project started by Pach,e-mail me at paradox65@comcast.net whith your e-mail addy.Hope to hear from ya!Lets get something going here.
clark was very sustinct and he advised the president in no uncertain terms that invading Iraq would exacerbate the fight against terrorism
show me a person that doesn’t know this guy is the most damaging head of state that America has ever known
Now- for your saturday afternoon amusement- how many things can you find wrong with THIS picture?
Katherine Harris explains the misunderstanding …
“At the time I had a meal with Mitchell Wade, I thought that my campaign would be reimbursing my share of the cost. I later discovered that somehow this was not done. I then discussed with my staff the best way to correct this oversight. Neither I nor my advisors ever thought it would be appropriate to reimburse Mr.Wade in the midst of the government investigations into his conduct. Just to resolve any questions, I have donated to a local Florida charity $100 which will more than adequately compensate for the cost of my beverage and appetizers.
“The night of our dinner, Mr. Wade purchased several expensive bottles of wine which he took home with him uncorked — this is apparently the reason the bill was so high.”
“I take full responsibility for this oversight and continue to operate under a policy of openness, transparency, and accountability to the people of my district and the state of Florida. While the rules are complicated, as a member of Congress, it is my responsibility to know and obey them. It has always been my intent to conduct myself in an ethical manner, and I regret this oversight.”
Thought bubble above Bush:
“Looks like I’ve got the biggest Dick. Heh Heh. And they think he’s in my pants. Heh Heh”
I’d say she’s uncorked
show me a person that doesn’t know this guy is the most damaging head of state that America has ever known
I wonder what it will be like trying to explain this sorry state of affairs to a school kid 10-20 years from now.
.
Does uncorked mean unopened and corked mean open? Does Katherine Harris know the difference?
Uncorked- means “I didn’t have sex with that man”.
We’re really gonna miss ol Kathy- now that she’s gone.
Edw*rd
I think it’s more careful parsing. If I’d bought a thousand dollar bottle of wine it damn well better be uncorked. If anyone brought my corked wine, I’d send it back.
And I usually carry home any wine I order, too.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
In my stomach!
from freedictionary.com:
“un·cork (n-kôrk)
tr.v. un·corked, un·cork·ing, un·corks
1. To draw the cork from.
2. To free from a sealed or constrained state”
A. I don’t think Harris knows the difference.
B. punaise is right - Harris IS uncorked.
The question is, given all this, why can’t the Democrats articulate a clear message that highlights a) the GOP’s failure on many fronts in the War on Terror, b) why we are more unsafe today as a result of the Bush Doctrine and c) how the Dems will approach foreign policy?
The Dems are STILL afraid to take Bush on for fear of being labeled “weak” but Jesus, if they can’t do it now, when will they be able to?
It’s time they find their backbone and start articulating a plan moving forward- a plan that involves NOT alienating all of our allies and stirring up anti-American hatred in all the world’s hot spots. And how about this- some diplomacy for a change? You know, instead of using American soldier’s lives like just so much tank fodder for Karl Rove’s fear-mongering?
Seems as if whoever performed Kathy’s lobotomy forgot to remove the icepick.
John Kerry today in Boston:
“I have come here today to reaffirm that it was right to dissent in 1971 from a war that was wrong. And to affirm that it is both a right and an obligation for Americans today to disagree with a President who is wrong, a policy that is wrong, and a war in Iraq that weakens the nation.
-snip-
Lives have been lost to bad decisions. Not decisions that could have gone either way, but decisions that constitute basic negligence and incompetence. And lives continue to be lost because of stubbornness and pride.”
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200.....NlYwM3MTY-
rwcole
Now- for your saturday afternoon amusement- how many things can you find wrong with THIS picture?
Mr. Wade purchased several expensive bottles of wine which he took home with him uncorked — this is apparently the reason the bill was so high.
Does she mean unopened? Uncorked would imply opened. I assume she’s saying she had none of the wine as it was never opened, thus owes nothing for it.
Does anyone say, “Cork the wine and pour us a glass”?
What does it matter, she’s lying.
.
From Dictionary.com
corked
adj 1: sealed with a cork 2: (of wine) tainted in flavor by a cork containing excess tannin; “a corked port”
I’ve also heard it used for wine with pieces of cork in it, from the cork breaking.
And who would be stupid enough to buy way over priced wine at a restruant if they were not gonna drink it there?
Is it even legal?
.
Yeah- I think she’s saying that Wade had the server uncork the expensive wine- to save him the trouble when he got home apparently- then he put the bottles in a doggie bag and took them home with him. (this is, of course, illegal in any state that I have ever heard of.
Restuarants have licenses for selling for on premises consumption-it’s illegal to sell for off premises use. Then you’ve got you open container laws.
She’s lost her marbles- big time!
Kathy does better ridin horses wearin her push up bra.
She’s lost her marbles- big time!
And she’s lying
.
Ms. Harris still scares me.
Taylor–Scares you? Hell- she’s pretty normal for a criminal psychotic.
back on topic,
I went down to my studio computer, which I don’t use for e-mail anymore, and looked this up. Back in early 2003, I was writing to a few friends who thought war against Iraq would be like Afghanistan had been the year before. I told them it would be far different and would destabilize the region. I predicted it would also lead to an increase in terror in the region.
Anyway, I found this back then and sent it out to friends. I’m sort of surprised it is still up and running. It’s a bit dated, but funny as hell, even though it could still come to pass:
http://idleworm.wolffelaar.nl/...../iraq2.swf
To understand what this report really means, you have to read the fine print regarding how they define “terrorists”. Newly identified terrorist organizations included in these statistics are:
al-cancer
al-el-heartattack
el-la-drunkdrivera
By including these previously unknown terrorist organization, we can get a much more clear picture of why we need Bush to continue his aggressive attacks in the Middle East. Gotta get them terrorist organizations over there a’fore they come here.
Hope this helps.
“Next week will begin the last 1000 days of George W. Bush’s presidency. I’m starting to feel safer already.”
Ms. Marsh,
Please… Don’t feel safer for a second. These rats are cornered. In their world, all policy is politics. So, to raise his flaccid poll (pole?) numbers and pump-up his base, King George might be ready to penetrate Irans bunkers with guided missiles (is it getting hot in here, or is it just me?). Newcular even.
Whew, I need break. And a cigarette…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katherine_Harris
Wikipedia’s write up on just a few of the Harris scandals.
Punaise at 11 Caped Cod
Oh, so THAT’S how the fish got to be the symbol of Christianity - the Caped Cod Crusaders!
Oh, and ThankYou, *ilson.
Ed*ard Teller - HILARIOUS. Great link.
c u n d gulag - Don’t despair, I was being sarcastic.
Too bad John Kerry couldn’t decide before or during his campaign that Iraq was Vietnam redux. Or if he had decided, to, um, let us in on it. I’m sure we can give some of the credit to Bob Schrum but geez, John, all those years positioning yourself to be President only to lose your nerve! At least you’re rich.
“. . . Mr. Wade purchased several expensive bottles of wine which he took home with him uncorked . . .”
Wasn’t that a scene in “Barfly?”
You know, the part where Mickey Rourke (right after he’s been caught in flagrante delicto with the local Congresswoman at a rotary fundraiser) spirits away several bottles of uncorked wine from behind the bar and walks out into the night making offers “TO ALL MY FRIENDS . . .”
sláinte
cl
Condi’s got wet panties about the new Prime Minister of Iraq.
Remember kids Col. Wilkerson told us last week we ain’t seen nothin’ yet, and that more leaks are coming. This fellow will be on 60 Min. sunday :Prewar Intelligence Ignored, Former C.I.A. Official Says
If you haven’t seen the Colonel’s talk, it’s still up on the C-SPAN site.
Sorry to interrupt the Harrisfest, but Larry Johnson has a very interesting post up about Mary McCarthy:
http://noquarter.typepad.com/m....._of_m.html
Details and questions you won’t find in the M$M.
and just what kind of “W Action” do we see working to lower the price of gasoline? Gallivanting around the country using up jet fuel bigtime doesn’t count, either!
A Latina student at Stanford, quoted in the Stanford Daily, re Bush’s visit fiasco the other day:
“I thought Stanford was really a bubble, but seeing all the people that are out here has shown me that people really are concerned,†she said. “I’m Latina; I’m from Guatemala. Right now President Bush is doing some very interesting things in Latin America. We have a phrase ‘For every pig, there will be a Saturday.’ Basically, his game is over.â€
Don’t you LOVE that - for every pig there will be a Saturday!
That’s been the problem with this war from the get go. A couple of years back, the National Intelligence Council, a think tank for the CIA, reported that Iraq actually was serving as a breeding ground for terrorists. In addition, Iraqi insurgents have perfected such things as building bombs and IEDs, and gained urban combat skills. Add to that the fact that we’ve pissed off huge swaths of the arab/muslim/persian populations, and we’ve got a huge mess on our hands.
These crazy conservatives with their, ‘We hate Europe, We hate Canada’ attitudes are ridiculous. Foreign intelligence agencies are a big part of our own counter-terrorism measures. But the Sean Hannity wing of the GOP can’t see that. They have no real ideas of how to keep the country safe, and they seem to find the notions of negotiation and peace abhorrent. Infuriating and frightening all at once.
It’s like the Right with its talk of a ‘pre-9/11′ attitude versus a ‘post 9/11′ attitude.
In the post 9/11 world, they allege, you don’t use law enforcement or indictments. That whole notion’s moronic because we should be using every tool we have - police, intelligence agencies, the courts, the military - to handle security issues. From what I’ve read, we have FBI and DEA agents in places such as Iraq and Afghanistan. So it’s just more dishonesty. Unfortunately, these kinds of notions are just too damn complex for conservative punditocracy to get.
“Strategery”….indeed. In football, if the back keeps fumbling, he gets benched. Baseball, if the pitcher keeps serving up home run balls…back to the minor leagues he goes. At your local bank, if the teller keeps mis-counting money, he gets fired. And on and on. Yet, at the WH, these idiots sail merrily along. What have they accomplished in our “Global War On Terror”?? What? Maybe that’s just the question we Americans should be asking.
And, what a bunch of fools to give up the hunt for Osama. Idiots. At the time, I just shook my head in wonder. Now, I see, they never really were very interested in getting him. He was just an excuse for their other “games”. remember when the WH told us that “well, Osama is reduced to nothing, just living in a cave like a rat”….how many terrorist attacks ago was that?
It’s standard military doctrine, anytime you want to take down the enemy, put its leaders on the target list. Goes back at least to WW-II. We should be on the hunt for Osama. He’s out there, coiled, and working on a strike. Meanwhile, our fearless leader wants to play “Top Gun” and run tanks around Iraq. Lunacy.
Ghostman
OK, I can’t figure that this ‘Road To Perdition’ currently playing in Bagdhad is about anything besides oil (claims of WMD, 911 notwithstanding…notsomuch…) and burning fossil fuels produces greenhouse gases, leading to ozone depletion and harm to humans from UV, etc. and it being Earth Day and all, just thought this was worth a link:
http://www.google.com/search?q=earth+day
As usual when Google attaches significance to the day, they have a wonderul graphically illustritive ‘google’ @ google home. Worth a click for sheer visual delight if you haven’t got you google today.
(disclosure: I have affiliation or stock holding or any other financial interest or employment by company referred to in this post.)
rwcole
That Harris story doesn’t make sense. I don’t think you can take wine home from a restaurant in Florida. There was some talk about changing that, but I’m not sure it went through. There are some arcane pecularities about liquor buying here.
The Florida press has certainly become hostile to Harris here–the Orlando and St Pete papers especially so. The pictures that accompany the stories have become particularly unflattering. She really only looks human from certain angles, in carefully composed compositions. The papers have quit trying to make her look non-monstrous.
uncorked = unhinged?
*ilson46201 says:
April 22nd, 2006 at 2:42 pm
and just what kind of “W Action†do we see working to lower the price of gasoline? Gallivanting around the country using up jet fuel bigtime doesn’t count, either!
And I’m sure all the people living in the CA Delta area feel so much safer knowing that the Army Corps of Engineers isn’t going to do anything to fix the levees there, unless the residents fork over the money for it.
Earlier this week, David Neiwert offered a slightly different perspective on the question of perceived terrorist threats.
http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/
From W Action #43
“Too bad John Kerry couldn’t decide before or during his campaign that Iraq was Vietnam redux”
Yeah. As far as I’m concerned, Kerry hasn’t gotten back from the wood shed yet - if ever. He’s still back there enduring is oh so well deserved thrashing for conducting one of the crappiest, and consequently, tragic Presidential campaigns in modern history.
do you mean a defense contractor was trying to get Congresswoman Katherine Harris drunk at a bar? Where was her husband? Does he know she is meeting other men and drinking wine? Expensive wine? What kind of family values is that? Not exactly the sort any right-thinking Floridian would want in the U.S. Senate for sure !
Cleter, if you’re working in a restaurant and someone spends $2,800 in one night, do you think you care if they ask you to not uncork a couple extra bottles of wine?
Harris was tryin ta get corked the other night by a college reporter- things was goin fine afore he puked on her.
damn bloody typo
dis: insert NO
new thread - old Earth
This diary at Kos http://dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/22/14424/9624 by Shockwave ties in with the last couple of threads. It summarizes a couple of the articles about Iraq and Iran up at the website for the Strategic Studies Institute of the U.S. Army War College.
Mostly pointing out - Iraq, not a good idea to begin with, even if handled differently (. . .critics also have neglected the larger lesson that there are certain limits to what military power can accomplish. For certain purposes, like the creation of a liberal democratic society that will be a model for others, military power is a blunt instrument, destined by its very nature to give rise to unintended and unwelcome consequences. Rather than “do it better next time,” a better lesson is “don’t do it at all.”)
And, Iran - won’t be a good idea either, even with many differnt handling possibilities.
Another related article, if I could find it, would be Scheuer’s take on the last Bin Laden tape and what it means for attack here in the US. Not a comforting read.
That’s OK, Taylor. It’s all better now. We’ve just turned the corner, and Jawad Al Maliki, noted secularist and consensus humanitarian (also: asshole buddies with
Jaafari and Al Sadr, and pick-a-mullah…:o)) is now Prime Minister-nominee, as per Condi Rice and Jack Straw’s machinations.
If, three years back, someone had gone out to Las Vegas, and made a little book on this guy, who is a staunch islamist hardass, ascending to the purple, while bushCo cheerleads and Condi dances naked, they could have made some serious bling.
I mean, can the “victory” bar get any lower?
The Kurds and the Sunnis, and bush, have expended all this political capital just to change out Jaafari, for one of his top aides.
What a deal. There went their chance to shoehorn into the “security ministries” anyone who will actually try to rein in the Shia militia, AKA the “Payback’s a bitch!” brigades.
I would love to know what Al Sadr got, for this little deal. He’s got the largest single bloc of votes in the assembly, and he wants bushCo gone yesterday. He was kingmaker for Jaafari.
Let’s see what transpires, as the minsterial appointments come into play, along with the oil-divvy.
I foresee some world-class footdragging, as the various factions may actually get together and sing “Kumbayah!”, only, they’ll do it because ALL their hands are on the vise handle that is ratcheting up the pressure on junior’s nads, with the mid-terms getting closer all the time, and the joy of watching him writhe, will be irresistable. :o)
Hell of a summer. :o)
‘
E*T-made my day!
Fitz-gon, Take me away!
Kitt, you’re right; he HAS to eat that enabling vote, just like John Edwards ate it, months ago.
And I STILL wouldn’t support him for another run.
We HAVE to have someone who will speak the truth to the american people: NO good result for us, from the shitmire. Only misery and problems.
That’s how fucked up was the decision to invade and TRY to occupy Iraq; no “plan” will work.
Same old-same old; we are not the solution, we (collectively speaking), caused the problem, and we are still the problem, and staying will not solve it.
It is in the hands of the Iraqis, and holding a gun to the heads of the factions (a gun that is morphing into a foo-foo water pistol, as we speak…) can only enforce (temporarily) the limited level of violence that we see now; sooner or later, the various factions will have to decide for themselves, if they want one country, or several.
The longer we stay, to try to impose the kind of “unity” that bushCo hopes will let them keep those giant bases, and the world’s largest embassy-cum-CIA-station on a permanent basis, the harder it will be to leave.
Which leaves the run-out option, and/or the american voters installing two democratic-controlled houses of congress, to start the withdrawal.
Any Utah FDL’rs out there? If any of you would be interested in joining the grass roots project started by Pach,e-mail me at shooogarp@hotmail.com with your e-mail address.
I would like to get a group of folks together to harass and shame Orrin Hatch and Bob Bennett. Chris Cannon and Ron Bishop too.
Delurk! Delurk! Let’s get active! This what FDL is all about ACTION!
Can I make a suggestion to all you folks posting your emails on this site?
Put your address in a form that can’t be read by spam bots who troll the web collecting addresses to sell to spam merchants.
Use the form: name at domain dot com
Rather than: name@domain.com
And your address will be far more invisible. You may still get spam, but it will be far more limited, as it will have to be collected by a human.
OT -
Sunday’s edition of CBS’ 60 Minutes has Ed Bradley speaking with Tyler Drumheller, the former Chief of the European Division of the CIA. Secretary Rice responded to his claims that the intelligence was worked around policy by saying this:
However, she must have a bad memory because the Iraq WMD Commission said [taken from page 115 of James Risen’s book]:
[paraphrased from my post at TGS]
you write: “Next week will begin the last 1000 days of George W. Bush’s presidency. I’m starting to feel safer already.” You don’t really think this cabal is going to give up power, do you - best NOT be complacent. It’s the boiling frog phenomenon - bit-by-bit they take away liberties and wage illegal war, in preparation for declaring martial law & cancelling the 2008 election.
In the interest of fairness, regarding the issue of Clinton and Osama via Hannity, let’s let the public decide for themselves. From tape:
Aside from that I’m generally suspicious of ambiguous announcements of this or that without supporting evidence. Recall the Lancet estimate of 100,000 Iraqis dead? That number was later determined to be the median estimate of a possible range of 80 deaths, to 190,000. All based on a handful of “interviews”. We all know what Twain said about statistics.
The appropriate terminology is
Morally Bankrupt and Perverse
Use it liberally