<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Post Hits Blair Over Iran Split</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:59:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Now? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Operation Iranian Liberation</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-71841</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Now? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Operation Iranian Liberation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 02:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-71841</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[…] In Washington Post Hits Blair Over Iran Split Taylor Marsh, writing at Fire Dog Lake, notes that the WaPo thinks Tony Blair is a total wimp for not submitting to the whims of the Shrubbery. […]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] In Washington Post Hits Blair Over Iran Split Taylor Marsh, writing at Fire Dog Lake, notes that the WaPo thinks Tony Blair is a total wimp for not submitting to the whims of the Shrubbery. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owlbear1</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-70101</link>
		<dc:creator>owlbear1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-70101</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here have some cheese with that…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/food/foodheroes/images/cheddar_300×193.jpg&quot;&gt;http://www.bbc.co.uk/food/food.....15;193.jpg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here have some cheese with that…</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/food/foodheroes/images/cheddar_300×193.jpg">http://www.bbc.co.uk/food/food&#8230;..15;193.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porta Bella</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69792</link>
		<dc:creator>Porta Bella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69792</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You know, I appreciate all the comments here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, I resent the the link to the Huff post.&lt;br /&gt;
I make a comment on theblogs, the most recent a blog by Carl Berstein in Vanity Fair as posted on the Huff Post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I sense there is becoming a cult re the blogging and am becoming more skeptic as to the purpose of the blogs–I am becomiing less and less inclined to stand beside this venue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Someone need to alert Arianna Huffington as to her policies re the comments on the blogs. They are delayed and sometimes never posted. It has been almost an hour since I posted a commment to Carl Bernstein’s blog there.&lt;br /&gt;
Who is more important? Why have comments when they are being screened and censored but the tabloid and sensationalism continues.  It is beginning to look as if the Huff post is nothing more than a tabloid dedicated to sensationalsim with Arriana posts the vehicle to fame and fortune.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Umm, I would suggest that this is nothing more that a way to fame and fortune for Arriana.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think that that commentators deserve more respect than that. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wana have a blog on the Huff post,-then expect comments. Wanna keep those comments out of your blog then censor them. That oughta do it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I appreciate all the comments here.</p>
<p>But, I resent the the link to the Huff post.<br />
I make a comment on theblogs, the most recent a blog by Carl Berstein in Vanity Fair as posted on the Huff Post.</p>
<p>I sense there is becoming a cult re the blogging and am becoming more skeptic as to the purpose of the blogs–I am becomiing less and less inclined to stand beside this venue.</p>
<p>Someone need to alert Arianna Huffington as to her policies re the comments on the blogs. They are delayed and sometimes never posted. It has been almost an hour since I posted a commment to Carl Bernstein’s blog there.<br />
Who is more important? Why have comments when they are being screened and censored but the tabloid and sensationalism continues.  It is beginning to look as if the Huff post is nothing more than a tabloid dedicated to sensationalsim with Arriana posts the vehicle to fame and fortune.</p>
<p>Umm, I would suggest that this is nothing more that a way to fame and fortune for Arriana.</p>
<p>I think that that commentators deserve more respect than that. </p>
<p>Wana have a blog on the Huff post,-then expect comments. Wanna keep those comments out of your blog then censor them. That oughta do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: professor rat</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69790</link>
		<dc:creator>professor rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 23:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69790</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Any simpleton that’s seen ‘ Mission impossible 1′ knows that the NOC lists are the crown jewels of CIA intelligence and are kept in special rooms at Langley and they are never, NEVER to be allowed to get into the open.&lt;br /&gt;
Rove’s limited hang-out just went all the way - he is not Phillip Agee or John Young at Cryptome. He must be fired immediately and frogmarched out the front door. Virginia farm boys in five minutes! COME ON!&lt;br /&gt;
It’s Fitzpeachment time - yesterday. 25th ammedment time - extraordinary election time.&lt;br /&gt;
Mutual aid or end-of-day’s? Your choice America.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any simpleton that’s seen ‘ Mission impossible 1′ knows that the NOC lists are the crown jewels of CIA intelligence and are kept in special rooms at Langley and they are never, NEVER to be allowed to get into the open.<br />
Rove’s limited hang-out just went all the way &#8211; he is not Phillip Agee or John Young at Cryptome. He must be fired immediately and frogmarched out the front door. Virginia farm boys in five minutes! COME ON!<br />
It’s Fitzpeachment time &#8211; yesterday. 25th ammedment time &#8211; extraordinary election time.<br />
Mutual aid or end-of-day’s? Your choice America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mommybrain</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69663</link>
		<dc:creator>mommybrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69663</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;SqueakyRat #74 - That Fred Phelps creature needs to be tied down and given a BJ.  How hate-filled do you have to be to be a member of that Church?  I know, they’re all his relatives, but still.  If my dad had ever talked like that I’d have wondered about his sanity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ccmask #53 - makes my blood boil to read the hypocracy.  By the way, is it today, the alternate April 15th, that something will happen?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SqueakyRat #74 &#8211; That Fred Phelps creature needs to be tied down and given a BJ.  How hate-filled do you have to be to be a member of that Church?  I know, they’re all his relatives, but still.  If my dad had ever talked like that I’d have wondered about his sanity.</p>
<p>ccmask #53 &#8211; makes my blood boil to read the hypocracy.  By the way, is it today, the alternate April 15th, that something will happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fran</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69660</link>
		<dc:creator>fran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69660</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wapo just won 4 pulitzers Jane must be ill!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wapo just won 4 pulitzers Jane must be ill!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vidkun</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69639</link>
		<dc:creator>vidkun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69639</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I read this putative GOP hatchet job and I don’t know what you’re talking about. It explicitly attributes Blair’s problems to Iraq and to his asshole-buddy Bush. Why should I not read this as the continuing saga of Bush allies paying for their toady ways, in Spain and now in Italy, and maybe soon, a PM in UK? âŠ‚âŠƒ [emoticon indicating maybe we should stop a minute &amp; sniff a fuckin ammonia ampule]. The Post is servile &amp; mediocre, but sometimes by accident they do report reality.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this putative GOP hatchet job and I don’t know what you’re talking about. It explicitly attributes Blair’s problems to Iraq and to his asshole-buddy Bush. Why should I not read this as the continuing saga of Bush allies paying for their toady ways, in Spain and now in Italy, and maybe soon, a PM in UK? âŠ‚âŠƒ [emoticon indicating maybe we should stop a minute &amp; sniff a fuckin ammonia ampule]. The Post is servile &amp; mediocre, but sometimes by accident they do report reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69629</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69629</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Barbara did say that&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barbara did say that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eclaire</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69624</link>
		<dc:creator>Eclaire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69624</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ccmask at #53, you made up that comment by Barbara Bush, didn’t you?  If not, then she’s talking about Republican males, obviously, who can recall with bell-like clarity, their single oral sex encounter.  I mean, really, what woman wants to, …, you know, with a Republican.  Think Grover Norquist (whoops, he’s a libertarian).  Tom DeLay?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, Democratic males have had so many encounters….. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, thanks for the giggle.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ccmask at #53, you made up that comment by Barbara Bush, didn’t you?  If not, then she’s talking about Republican males, obviously, who can recall with bell-like clarity, their single oral sex encounter.  I mean, really, what woman wants to, …, you know, with a Republican.  Think Grover Norquist (whoops, he’s a libertarian).  Tom DeLay?</p>
<p>Now, Democratic males have had so many encounters….. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for the giggle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pod</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69595</link>
		<dc:creator>Pod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/17/washington-post-hits-blair-over-iran-split/#comment-69595</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Fitz has let us down completely:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.house.gov/hinchey/FitzgeraldResponseToHinchey.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.house.gov/hinchey/F.....inchey.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One page pdf linked at Rep. Hinchey’s site.  Why did it take Fitz SIX MONTHS to offer his REFUSAL TO INVESTIGATE THE NIGER FORGERIES as requested by Rep. Hinchey and 39 other Democrats?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fitz has let us down completely:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.house.gov/hinchey/FitzgeraldResponseToHinchey.pdf">http://www.house.gov/hinchey/F&#8230;..inchey.pdf</a><br />
One page pdf linked at Rep. Hinchey’s site.  Why did it take Fitz SIX MONTHS to offer his REFUSAL TO INVESTIGATE THE NIGER FORGERIES as requested by Rep. Hinchey and 39 other Democrats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
