I’m in Los Angeles in the secret bat cave of Crooks & Liars tonight. We’re going to take a bit of a respite from our bigotsphere series. As I’ve mentioned in the comments, we’re going to try and put together an online, downloadable PDF book of all the entries for free distribution, and I hope it winds up on the desk of every journalist and every politician in the country. I’m really, really proud of how funny, profound and insightful these posts have been. But there are a couple of people whose voices I want to hear from before I close it out so they’ll probably be weighing in later in the week.
In the meantime let’s take a glance at what a sad waste of time the Pulitzers have become. They dole one out to David Finkel of the Washington Post, author of the liberal blogger hit piece that ran on Sunday — kind of like Mary Carey getting the Oscar, know what I mean? Sue Schmidt should’ve been drummed out of journalism for her stint as a first class front page shit shoveler during Whitewater, but she was allowed to resurrect herself in order to spare no effort to tar Democrats with the GOP corruption brush. Remember how the whole Deborah Howell "Jack Abramoff gave money to Democrats too" thing started? Yep that’s right, Lil’ Deb picked that up from reading Steno Sue’s Pulitzer-worthy (I suppose) work.
Hey Sue — don’t you think it’s about time you acknowledged the debt you owe to the work of David Rosenbaum of the New York Time, who was murdered earlier this year? It would be the classy thing to do. Which is why nobody should hold their breath.
I guess I shouldn’t be so surprised. TBogg shows us the work of Robin Gihvan, also of the Washington Post, who demonstrates what it truly means to get a Pulitzer these days (here talking about the John Roberts family):
The wife wore a strawberry-pink tweed suit with taupe pumps and pearls, which alone would not have been particularly remarkable, but alongside the nostalgic costuming of the children, the overall effect was of self-consciously crafted perfection. The children, of course, are innocents. They are dressed by their parents. And through their clothes choices, the parents have created the kind of honeyed faultlessness that jams mailboxes every December when personalized Christmas cards arrive bringing greetings "to you and yours" from the Blake family or the Joneses. Everyone looks freshly scrubbed and adorable, just like they have stepped from a Currier & Ives landscape.
In a time when most children are dressed in Gap Kids and retailers of similar price-point and modernity, the parents put young master Jack in an ensemble that calls to mind John F. "John-John" Kennedy Jr.
Separate the child from the clothes, which do not acknowledge trends, popular culture or the passing of time. They are not classic; they are old-fashioned. These clothes are Old World, old money and a cut above the light-up/shoe-buying hoi polloi.
At some point someone involved in this episode of The Surreal Life: Pulitzers mustered some shame and the very deserving James Risen and Eric Lichtblau were honored (and to appreciate what Lichtblau has had to put up with over the years from the Alien Queen herself, Barbara Comstock, in order the to get his job done please check out this post by emptywheel). Of course the authoritarian cargo cultists are already calling for their imprisonment because the Leaker in Chief is the only one allowed to engage in National Security Incontinence.
Congratulations to Lictblau and Risen for much-deserved honors; they are now being hounded by the Bush Administration for their efforts (can’t you hear Fred Hiatt cheering in the background?) There are still journalists doing heroic work out there, it’s just harder to see them for all the truthiness passing for journalism these days.



109 Comments





Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Firedoglake
FITZ AND IMPEACHMENT NOW!
What about Dana Priest? That was a deserving prize.
Phrase of the day: National Security Incontinence.
to the ICJ immediatement!
I get to go into the other room and watch Keith Olbermann on an enormous TV set talking about the NY Sun documnents through the magic of TIVO.
Yep, pretty exciting.
While the Pulitzer committee may have had some missteps, I think the other truly deserving winners should be commended.
The superhuman efforts of the Time-Picayune during the Katrina aftermath deserve three or four years worth of Pulitzers. Also, lets not forget the San Diego Union-Tribune for breaking and digging through the Cunningham muck. Too bad they couldnt fit Murray Waas into the mix.
You are so cool and deserving, Jane. How is CA anyway? I used to live in Newport Beach on the beach and had friends in Venice! Give it a virtual squeeze for me! ;)
Jane: Tell John I’m getting lots of email, thanks! Google has me frozen again, and I’m getting some help with invitations, but I’ll have to create some more groups again. I may send you a list tomorrow once things slow down again.
Stop all this nonsense for 30 seconds and prepare to laugh…. A lot.
http://video.google.com/videop…..5967411931
And the guys in San Diego who outed Duke Cunningham? Great job!
I wish the Toledo Blade people had received recognition for the Coin-gate investigation —
In spite of all the downer news — undeclared war on Iran?, pushback on the generals asking for Rummy’s resignation — the news about Ryan’s convictions made my day. Go, Fitz! What we need is a repeat for your WH investigation.
EPUd – even better media :
on a happier note (and with one mild caveat – this includes a positive comment about Obama and McCain which I will fuss about), a friend sent a link to a new and important global warming initiative complete with a very good 4 minute movie (which my friend produced) which should be shared widely – along with the action steps attached – this is something we can all do no matter our location – offsetting our own carbon emissions is actually quite inexpensive and makes a big impact:
from Joel Makower, http://www.makower.com
I’m very pleased to announce the launch of a 4-minute flash movie on climate change that I produced over the past year in partnership with Stonyfield Farm and two nonprofits, Earth Day Network and Clean Air-Cool Planet. The movie is part of an ambitious campaign to mobilize citizens to take mass actions to change — or circumvent — our political and corporate leaders’ tepid response to climate change.
The movie — a “documentary†told from 2056 — tells the story of how “2006 was the year that changed everything,†when tens of thousands of citizens come together on the Internet to buy clean power. That unleashes a succession of positive changes, as utilities scramble to build wind and solar farms, individuals make fortunes investing in new clean-tech companies, and old dinosaurs like Ford and McDonald’ find profit — and salvation — in clean, green technology. Even Martha Stewart gets involved.
To view the movie and the plan, click here:
http://www.renewus.org/index.html
Jane,
I am just stunned by the Rosenbaum article, I had never seen nor heard of it.
My initial response to your post was, ‘Come on, that article w/Grimaldi was quite good, rich in detail blah blah blah’
and then I read David’s ‘blueprint’ – think of the dearth of info on Dear Jack when that article was written
You were right to call them out for that -
talk about ’shoulders of giants’
hope you’re enjoying the bat cave!
cbl – left you a note on last – it’s awaiting moderation so check later, ok?
(I’m assuming the mod thing is because there are 2 links in the post – to a big new global warming initiative – it’s worth waiting for!)
mk #10
here here on San Diego Union! actual shoeleather involved ! You may know Toledo Blade won last year for their series on Vietnam Atrocities
hey and speaking of Abramoff, just caught the Shuster clip on 265 emails from Safavian to Jack, but the most tantalizing was hearing prosecutors are still trying to cut a deal with Safavian oh yeah daddy, bring that!
Cheers for Dana Priest, but I, too, wish the Toledo Blade had been honored. For a relatively small paper they are doing a great job with Coingate. I believe they have single-handedly broken the story.
And I still love Robin Gihvan’s take on how ridiculous the DICK looked in his ski parka at the somber ceremony in Europe.
Great catch on the WaPo’s Robin Gihvan. What an insightful eye she has and what a heartbreaking piece about Roberts’ kids. IIRC, she caught DeadEye in a pink tie for his Brit Hume, how-I-shot-Harry- in-the-face, interview.
FWIW: Cozumel had linked to some great news about Olbermann ratings heading north. Given the similarity of the FDL/Kos audiences with Olbermann’s, if I had any marketing responsibility for Olbermann’s show, I would really want a lot of coverage of the Kos panel. Summer can be slow for news.
mk (and OhioBLue) another hear hear, this time on the Toledo Blade. Great job. Also, as ZenN pointed out below thread, this deserved the nod it got:
http://www.pulitzer.org/year/2…..ich01.html
Did Steno Sue ever get around to the Chinese and garment connections? The acting US atty removed in Guam? The . . .never mind. If someone wants to hand out a pulitzer for Abramoff, the Rolling Stone article is FANTASTIC!
I will give WaPo credit for graphics when they make an effort. Whoever does their charts and flow charts and graphs and interconnects – that person/dept should get some kudos, even though I mostly skip the paper itself these days. How aggravating to read an excellent article, to have it all surrounded by tripe. I guess all the irritants at WaPo do mean a few of the journalists mfg pearls, but I’m not up to craking open a few hundred slimy grey things looking for them anymore.
siun, I thought putting your comment for Taylor this morning on the previous thread was really well done.
Thanks for the link in 17, Mary.
I hope the pulitzer and related kudos encourages the San Diego Union Tribune to do more fact based investigations. They must’ve gotten some ugly push back because they hired a reporter/blogger named Chris Reed who is really swiggin’ the Jim Jones punch and spewing utter nonesense about Iraq trying to buy Uranium from Niger. He still believes it.
The most amazing thing about the Cunningham story isn’t what Marcus Stern dug up – the most amazing thing is that the U-T printed it.
You’re welcome John, but I owe it to ZenN. I’ll slide in a thank you here to you and GSD for all the links you each provide – I don’t get to say something each time, but I very much appreciate them.
Speaking of pulitzers – here’s Carl Bernstein in Vanity Fair with a few words to say about Bushco and Senate investigations, topped with unflattering comparisons to Nixon. Carl was always my favorite.
http://www.vanityfair.com/feat…..0417fege08
John – thanks
and Mary – Rolling Stone has become my one regular print media source – they have been doing brilliant work. Their online politics news feed is very very good as well and I check there daily. (I’m still enjoying the image of you + john deere on easter – wonderful!)
Woo hoo! Couldn’t get WordPress to edit in Mac and all I’ve got here in LA is Macs coming out my ears. Found out it won’t work with Safari, you have to install Firefox.
I did not know what I was going to do for the next few days. I know the WaPo would feel utterly bereft.
Jane, I hope you consider adding to your piece to amplify on what you said: “There are still journalists doing heroic work out there”
This is so true of the HEROIC efforts of the The Times-Picayune of New Orleans. I read much of their reporting at the time, including the details of what the staff went through during Katrina. Their dedication was beyond belief, imo. Stunning, truly amazing, as I read their work. Many of those working hard to get the news out, trapped in a flooding building in NO, didn’t even know where their families were. Heartbreaking. I can’t comment on The Sun Herald of Gulfport, Miss., as I didn’t read their coverage, but I assume they are deserving as well.
Or, if it’s not practical to amend your current post, PLEASE consider doing another one that highlights the difference between the heroic efforts of the Picayune staff and co in face of incredible adversity, vs. the easy life of the reporters on the DC cocktail weenie circuit. That is a stark contrast. Picayune staffers were professionals, deeply involved in the importance of their work and craft, doing what they could to provide life-saving information to their readers. The others (Wapo screed)… well, words escape me.
Valley Girl and gang.
Times Pic has done well during and since Katrina but before “the thing” as Chris Rose of Times Pic calls it…
IMHO…shills for the most part. Very much pandering to those in power locally. Not rocking the boat very much if ever. Lots of puff pieces on the local military installations. Reporting on the corruption once the US Atty found it. No original reporting to speak of in pre-Katrina land. My Dad’s weekly scooped them and the Daily in semi-rural Hammond, LA on a regular basis. It is redicuous and just shows how they have to pander to the advertisers and those in power. My dad is too busy losing money too worry about that! All this underscores the need for the Internet and the blogs and any independent media out there. They are doing all this now because the chips are down and our city and way of life is on the line. Better late than never but I would have appreciated something more from the daily with a monopoly in this city.
Valley Girl — maybe we’ll have our own counter-Pulitzers. Whaddaya think?
Ohhh Jane sounds cool….Late nite real deal reporting with FDL…
you so rock as usual.
I think it’s a great idea.
OfT “CenterPoint Energy Issues Rolling Blackouts In Houston”
“Customers Should Decrease Electricity Usage”
UPDATED: 6:15 pm CDT April 17, 2006
HOUSTON — Unseasonably hot temperatures forced power utilities around the Houston area and Texas to conduct rolling blackouts on Monday.
http://www.click2houston.com/n…..etail.html
Thanks for another link in 21, Mary. The Bernstein piece is going to be widely read and discussed, I believe. If there’s one thing the Bush Administration has needed a stiff dose of, it’s Congress’ subpoena power.
Here’s my favorite slice from the piece. It sounds almost like an epitaph for the Bush Administration:
OT: Did anyone catch NPR’s Talk of the Nation segment today with their ombudsman? I heard just a portion of it; the guy seemed fairly intent on getting beyond he said/she said faux “balance”.
You could call the new awards the “Firedogs of Excellence”.
Yep, on the new Macs, Firefox is mandatory for any blogging, except HuffPo.
How long you gonna be down? Call us.
hi Siun – good energy/climate video – thanks for the warning about the “gag me” McCain/Obama moment. Martha Stewart pastel solar panels – LOL.
There’s a move afoot in Berkeley to create a city-owned utility co., and one of the goals is for greener production. Will check into it.
Man I’ve been reading this blog for a while now, especially the WaPo stuff, but today for the first time I heard about the WaPo’s financial windfall thanks to their educational subsidiaries(Kaplan and the Quest Education Corporation) and Bush’s no child left behind act. Is this widely known?…am I just slow?
MsAnnaNOLA- Thank you so much for the info in #25. I know you’ve been posting here for quite a while, and I take what you say very seriously. Being not from NO, all I know of the Times Pic is what I read during the Katrina coverage, and others from outside the area would not have your perspective. Despite that background, it did seem to me that the Times Pic staffers truly did rise to the occasion in an heroic way, even if not before. Whatever their history pre-Katrina, the reporting at the time seemed quite extraordinary, and does deverved highlighting by comparison with Steno Sue and their ilk. That kind of FDL post probably would not be able to go into the details of their previous behavior while still socking it to the Steno Sues (me imagining myself trying to write such a post). I’d really like to hear more of what you have to say on this matter. xxoo VG
question for Jane – last night you referred to several targets of the bigotsphere campaign expressing their ire – did you ever treat us gossips to any deeper dirt on that front?
I don’t know Venice very well, but during a brief visit a while back got the distinct impression that there was a lot more to it than the cliche’d beachfront freak show (sorry, locals!).
FDL’er, ripping Debbie:
“Howell wrote. “News stories are to inform; editorials are to influence.”
They are. But, to paraphrase Patrick Moynihan, you’re entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts. That’s the “trouble” we were having with the Washington Post editorial. Whoever wrote it seems to think he’s entitled to his own set of facts that support his position.
Even your excuses for lousy journalism are becoming pathetic.
Posted by: Cujo359 | April 17, 2006 05:16 PM”
OT, great to have you back punaise.
The FDL journalism awards are an excellent idea. Could we honor the memory of David Rosenbaum and name them after him?
hmmm… counter Pulitzers… sounds daunting to make a selection. It would be real easy in some categories at least, if writing for public service, or humor, or style could include Fitz’s written text of filings (is that the right term?) in the Libby case.
Dan 30 Thanksmuch. I do think Carl left one out though – the flightsuited Pres in front of the Rove ordered and taxpayer bought & paid for “Mission Accomplished.”
Jane – if you don’t already have another gameplan, I think RBG’s idea (38) is awfully good.
Maybe we can dig up some “the truth is out there” leftover X files posters as prizes.
OT: after shaking off the bunt sign a few times, d r i f t g l a s s hits a solid, bases-clearing double in the gap:
…The last in (sic) of the window closed on the GOP in 2004. That was the 11th hour of their soul: a last chance to stand up and demonstrate that any of them are even remotely interested in justice and the public good and holding elected officials to account for lies, corruption, treason, the deaths of Americans and the ruin of nations.
They’re not.
They’re a sack of complicit assholes who would rather napalm the Constitution than live by it. Who scream themselves deaf that Liberals Are Angry while relying for their electoral manhood wholly and deliberately on racists and homophobes and grinning professional haters like Rush and Falwell and Robertson. So when faced both with prospect of losing (and the acres of subpoenas that will follow) and the reality that all of their First Order Lies are collapsing into rubble around them, do not expect them to come over all reasonable.
Expect trench warfare…as the stalling and obfuscating and rear-guard cover-up actions by Quislings like Pat Roberts to get hotter and angrier.
Expect the Swiftboating to be cranked up to a hitherto unimagined level.
Expect terror-alerts every seven minutes.
…
So as they scramble for the lifeboats while simultaneously declaring that anyone who says the ship is taking on water is a traitor, expect Republican rhetoric to get very wild and very ugly indeed over the next six months.
Expect the bullshit to get more extravagant and the bearings that work Scotty McClellan’s jaw up and down over his lie-hole to burn out and need replacing at least once a week.
MsAnnaNOLA p.s. or maybe in light of your comments #25, the story line could be:
Times Pic- history of being shills for the most part. Very much pandering to those in power locally. But they rose to the occasion when disaster struck (Katrina).
vs.
WaPo Steno Sues – history of being shills for the most part. Very much pandering to those in power locally. And, they are incapable of rising to the occasion when disaster strikes (BushCo.).
Well, if you think about it, the Rosenbaum piece on Abromov kind of explains why he was killed. Someone has a long memory.
Steve — I will call you & Pam.
VG — I’m up to my eyeballs right now in book, Plame, blog, yearly kos, mom, etc. I know you’re busy but if anyone has any interest in handling the nuts-and-bolts aspect of this one let me know.
We could also have some “Judy Miller” awards for worst journalist, one for worst editorial….
Maybe you could announce the winners and losers at the Kos Panel?
A few quick comments, then I have to go…
Sue Schmidt won a Pulitzer for her coverage of Abramoff? The world really has turned upside down.
A journalism award for deserving journalists is a great idea. Naming them after Rosenbaum is a good idea, too.
You write a snarky little comment somewhere and it lives forever. (Thanks, John Casper, it’s nice to be noticed even if it’s not by the source of your annoyance.)
unordered lists work on this blog.
Well, as they say in Mexico, auf wiedersehen!
The Putz-Licker Prize
(…or not.)
Hey, just got through an 18-hour trip to the interior of Alaska and pulled in an e-mail from Parachutec about the Roots Project.
Listened to “T-Rex” doing “Bang The Gong” on the plane. Things are looking up!
peace,
jim
John Casper – thanks, it’s good to back in FDL-ville
Valley Girl:
Yeah you got it. I just thought I would let you all in on the “truth” from my perspective. I agree that they have done well since Katrina hit. I am just not fawning over them because their ass is on the line now! That rag will be worth nothing if the city is not rebuilt so lets just say there is a little something in it for them. Oh and if what I heard on the debate today is true…(no idea by the way but it is consistent with past performances.) one candidate stated that Ron Forman was working with the former Mayor Morial’s people. If that is true, he is probably corrupt as Morial was and guess who endorsed him? Ta Da you are correct…The Times Picayune!
Again, I am not sure if it is true because I just heard it mentioned on the nationally televised debate with Tweety but would not be surprised.
this is weird – my #34 says it’s awaiting moderation:
hi Siun – good energy/climate video – thanks for the warning about the “gag me†McCain/Obama moment. Martha Stewart pastel solar panels – LOL.
There’s a move afoot in Berkeley to create a city-owned utility co., and one of the goals is for greener production. Will check into it.
Jane, clarification- which “this one” are you meaning? The counter-Pulitzers? Not in the counter category, but in the ALSO category, looks like the Toledo Blade is deserving, based on comments above. Any further thoughts you might have would be helpful and welcome. I can contribute research, but not writing (too much writing on my plate right now). I’m sure if we could get a plan, FDLers would step in. First step might be more feedback from commenters on this thread as to deserving names that were missed.
And maybe a first post could be about Toledo Blade, and then following up with a late nite challenge to come up with others who belong in the instead or missing category. I’m sure with the enthusiam of FDLers many links would be provided.
OR, maybe something that doesn’t even involve a first post about Toledo Blade- just a FDL late nite challenge for the best “others”, giving the various Pulitzer categories within, and the basis for judging, the judges, etc. I could probably find the latter info quickly on the internet.
Jane,
You’re absolutely right, but your post comes off a bit heavy. Name a year when the Pulitzers got it totally right, or – name a year they did measurably better?
OTOH,
1. Luckovich’s winner is my new screensaver – I’m going to show it to my class tomorrow at 22-foot by 28-foot resolution.
2. I think there are already counter-Pulitzers out there.
3. Hope you’re enjoying the bat cave and getting good work done.
anybody else getting these?:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
April 17th, 2006 at 11:10 pm
said comment was short and had no links in it.
Hope I’m not repeating something that may already have been posted, but… Carl Bernstein’s piece in Vanity Fair is recommended reading for everyone who is disgusted with his ex-partner Woodward, and wants to know exactly where integrity survives. It survives in Bernstein. He more than makes the case for the Constitution of the United States.
http://www.vanityfair.com/feat…..0417fege08
not me punaise…I have been long winded and linked as usual…ha ha :)
shoephone: it was but someone re-recommended it and so I went back and read it. Excellent. I forwarded it to my minions um er friends.
Ed*ard Teller
2. I think there are already counter-Pulitzers out there.
If that’s true, then we can save Jane and FDlers some time and agony. Do you have a link? Or, a suggestion to follow the theme in a complementary way that would help give more visibility to FDL issues?
I must have had way to much coffee or way too much WWIII posts today! It is 2 am! Night all! happy Late Nite FDLing.
‘Sausage Tactics…’ here:
Panic in Year Zero…
Coming Next:
Somnambulist censored from rightwingnews.com for posting a short article excerpt from American Conservative magazine! Post deleted by moderator!
MsAnnaNOLA #58
I for one have no problem “digesting” your spicy Cajun links. Laissez les bonnes paroles rouler.
punaise #55
no
Every once in a while a comment is accidentally going to get caught in the spam filter. We try to go in regularly and clean them out.
VG,
No link and no time. Long day today, longer one tomorrow, so off to bed. Had to check in here to see if a Pulitzer prize thread had happened, and lo and behold – it is the late night de jour. Drama blogs are agog, not realizing the drama prize is fairly often NOT awarded.
I remember seeing a counter-Pulitzer piece somewhere about three years ago, but where…….?
Love ya, valley girl!
RE: counter Pulitzer
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1220-21.htm
Jane 64 – thanks for the info.
(mmmm: spam, cajun links, sausage. we need some roughage)
http://www.pulitzer.org/
Above is the link to Pulitzer site. Unfortunately, there don’t seem to be any unique addresses to individual pages, so you’ll have to click through it. I copied and pasted this from one page:
===Members of the 2006 Pulitzer Prize Board
Lee C. Bollinger, President, Columbia University
Jim Amoss, Editor, Times-Picayune, New Orleans, La.
Amanda Bennett, Editor and Executive Vice President, The Philadelphia Inquirer
Joann Byrd, Former Editor of the Editorial Page, Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Kathleen Carroll, Executive Editor and Senior Vice President, Associated Press
Thomas L. Friedman, columnist, The New York Times
Henry Louis Gates, Jr., W.E.B. DuBois Professor of Humanities, Harvard University
Donald E. Graham, Chairman, The Washington Post
Anders Gyllenhaal, Editor and Senior Vice President, Star Tribune, Minneapolis-St. Paul
Jay T. Harris, Wallis Annenberg Chair, Director, Center for the Study of Journalism and Democracy, Annenberg School of Communication, University of Southern California
David M. Kennedy, Donald J. McLachlan Professor of History, Stanford University
Nicholas Lemann, Dean, Graduate School of Journalism, Columbia University
Ann Marie Lipinski, Senior Vice President and Editor, Chicago Tribune
Gregory L. Moore, Editor, The Denver Post
Richard Oppel, Editor, Austin American-Statesman
Mike Pride, Editor, Concord (N.H.) Monitor
Paul Steiger, Managing Editor, The Wall Street Journal
Paul Tash, Editor, St. Petersburg Times
Sig Gissler, Administrator, Graduate School of Journalism===
The Norman Solomon P.U.litzer referred to in my #66 is awarded for bad journalism only. Not sure if there is a ‘counter Pulitzer’ for excellence in journalism, but there are all sorts of journalism awards, so I don’t see a problem in starting a new one, whether for journalistic excellence or stenographic garbage.
Bullgoose- thanks for the link. Read up, all.
===It is regrettable that only a few journalists can win a P.U.-litzer. In 2005, a large volume of strong competitors made the selection process very difficult. And now, the fourteenth annual P.U.-litzer Prizes, for the foulest media performances of 2005: ===
I won’t spoil the fun, but just as a teaser, a few familiar names are named, like those beginning with Mil*** and Woo*****.
Awwww crap… This is going to be messy. There are some nutcases in the new reformed Likud party (er… Kadima) and BushCo that don’t remind this crap at all.
Remember, Bush said before 9/11 that it might be best to just let them fight it out and US would see who was standing when the dust settled. Reeeallll Grown up policymaking there.
Rmember to put this mess at Bush’s doorstep too. You will be accused of “Bush hatred” but remind those kinds of folks that sitting by and doing nothing was his @#!$% policy… real brilliant. Now we got Likud morphing into a pretend moderate party with more influence than ever, and Hamas running Palestine -real swift, BushCo. It’s not his “fault” but he were a hell of an enabler.
***
Israel Warns of New ‘Axis of Terror’ By LAURIE COPANS, Associated Press Writer
57 minutes ago
TEL AVIV, Israel – After Hamas defended a deadly suicide bombing Monday, Israel’s U.N. ambassador warned that recent statements by the Palestinian government, Iran and Syria “are clear declarations of war, and I urge each and every one of you to listen carefully and take them at face value.”
Ambassador Dan Gillerman cautioned that a new “axis of terror” — Iran, Syria and the Hamas-run Palestinian government — was sowing the seeds of the first world war of the 21st century.
“A dark cloud is looming above our region, and it is metastasizing as a result of the statements and actions by leaders of Iran, Syria, and the newly elected government of the Palestinian Authority,” he said.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200…..lestinians
Robin Givhan is God!
And, don’t forget to congratulate the Wonder that is Dana Priest.
OT … Wow! Carl Bernstein has written an excellent article in Vanity Fair, entitled “Senate Hearings On Bush, Now”:
http://www.vanityfair.com/feat…..0417fege08
what about the many journalists & photographers our government has murdered in iraq? don’t they deserve recognition, again & again, lest americans forget that our leaders can’t stand free speech?
Pachacutec – I e-mailed you about organizing in Tucson.
Jane – Enjoy California. I miss my Bay Area roots.
Also, it sounds like John Amato is livin’ the life: big screen and TIVO!
Here’s Col. Wikerson’s speech at the Mideast Inst. last week. Well worth the hour it takes. It’s in the Most Viewed Video section lower right hand corner: click here
I just loved this from Wilkerson last year:
48 punaise says:
The Putz-Licker Prize
HA HA HA !!!
Punaise, you rock. That is just too good and too precise. Judy Kneepads, Li’l Debbie, the whole lot of them f’lating the Sugardaddy Moneybag Warmachine. SLURP!
Jeex, but FDL is one helluvan American National Treasure…
I didn’t have as big a problem with the Finkel article on The Angry Left as others did (and apparently neither did the subject of the article). We are angry and rightfully so.
If the Post (and the right generally) want to label us as angry, we should see that as an opportunity to make it clear that we, and all Americans, have abundant reason to be angry. And that people all over America (on the left and the right) share that anger … about both how we got into Iraq and how the post-war recontruction has been mismanaged, about Katrina, about cronyism, about domestic spying, about the treatment of veterans, and on and on. And that anger is the MOST appropriate response to an administration that had demonstrated an unforgiveable level of ignorance and incompetence and corruption. Because anger motivates action. And action is the only thing that will bring change.
The Post has done so many other things that are more damaging to their integrity and our political discourse. Like last week’s (4/9) editorial on the leak and today’s stupid editorial on the military “revolt” somehow threatening to politicize the military. Like Bush hasn’t done everything possible to associate the military with his political agenda.
This “Angry Left” article just isn’t that important by comparison.
And Finkel’s article on Yemen (which is what he won for) was excellent, speaking as a general reader and not a Yemen expert. I am not at all unhappy that he won a Pulitizer for it.
.
Tom Lasseter of Knight Ridder should have a Pulitzer too. This story is another piece of evidence on why the Generals are talking…U.S. knew Shiite militias were a threat but took no action largely because they were focused on Sunni insurgency
BY TOM LASSETER
Knight Ridder Newspapers
Oh Jane. I was so relishing how this diary started out. I was 110 percent with ya until you came for Gihvan. She’s actually a very talented fashion writer (I know because I myself play a fashion writer in real life and love her stuff), and a lot more objective and biting when it comes to criticism than most out there. If she won a prize for her style writing then she probably deserved it.
As for the piece you highlighted, reading between the lines, it seems to me that Givhans, who is black, is trying to tell us something about the Roberts the judge based on how the family dresses and it is hardly positive (and perhaps even a little scary!).
Jane-Have you seen any of my old friends?
Gihvans description of the Roberts costumes stands out in my memory, I suppose because she managed to subversively articulate something I myself felt. While most of the press was going on and on about how cute his kids were (and the “adorable dancing” boy – in shorts and saddle shoes!!!! – careening out of control at press conferences), my skin was crawling at the spectacle of the wife and two little children being paraded out there like something out of a story book (very reminiscint of the kind of thing one saw in DC a lot in the Reagan 80’s). I saw image of the wife – an attorney herself – dressed in easter candy pink suit and the two children (matching set of twins) in their pastel turn of the century outfits as a message to the right, “Judge Roberts is with you, don’t worry.”
Worth contacting Rosenbaum’s family to either ask or inform them about using his name, so they don’t first hear about it from the right wing screamers?
Jane, you’re outstanding. I’m new here & when you said you were going to Venice, my thought was that you were just another jet-setter, but that was silly of me
My only suggestion is that it’s more fun to put out a list of ‘worsts’, like the Ig-nobels that scientists do. Among the worst you’d include non-deserving Pulitzers, thus showcasing them in a suitable context
On February 22, 2004, Susan Schmidt unveiled the Abramoff/Scanlon extortion racket for the very first time. Without that article, for all its flaws, there would be no “Abramoff scandal”. I have no problem trashing Schmidt for her many other failures, but her work on the Abramoff/Scanlon fiasco was groundbreaking, and its repercussions will be felt for years. If Dems take the House this November, we quite possibly have Schmidt to thank.
Those who think that all Dems have clean hands in the tribal lobbying game are frankly, wrong. Abramoff may have wanted most of the cash of his six tribal clients to go to his Republican buddies, the tribes were not always compliant, and knew which Dem palms were greasable as well. If we Indians can admit leaders like Poncho were corrupt, why can’t Dems do the same. It actually makes us more credible, not less.
Hannity is staying in for the long run here……
Quote:
“Let me be straight with you – I like George Bush,” Hannity said. “I think he’s a man of principle, a man of faith. I think he’s got a backbone of steel and he’s a real, genuine, big-time leader … He’s a consequential figure for his time. We don’t see it right now.”
History will vindicate Bush as a strong leader the same way it did Harry Truman, another unpopular president of his time, Hannity said.
snip
Oy, vey.
OT:
Bob Portman new Office of Management and Budget director, to be named today
Questions flying around my mind this morning about the latest Plame development — the declassification and release of the INR memo and analysis. Why was it released? Perhaps to bolster Libby claims that there was a lot of ill feeling between analysts about the Niger claims — it certainly comes through that these guys did not feel in the loop about the Wilson trip or at least claimed they knew nothing.
So my big question is — is the administration “aligned” with the prosecution — or maybe are they “aligned” with the defense? Certainly the documents and the Luskin spin arrived in the NY Sun inbox nearly simultaneously.
And I wonder how or if any of this will play in the Friday hearing on gag orders. Would Luskin be subject to one?
Jane….
call those counter awards
“the Pukelitzers”
It is worth reading the Opinion page of the WaPo today including EJ Dionne (who gives Broder a swift one). I’d love to find old columns of Cohen’s to see where he was in 04 prior to the election. I don’t read him all the time, but I’m pretty sure I’m seeing a rat jumping a sinking ship, or trying to, anyway.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…../opinions/
Dear Jane: You omitted my favorite Pulitzer irony. Risen and Lichtblau won an award for a story the Times refused to print for an entire year for reasons it still refuses to discuss.
OS…Anyone else have problems following the thread or reloading… once you submit a comment?
Punaise – glad you liked the little movie – I think it’s a good campaign for folks to participate in – and easy.
On Oakland green power – email Joel (see his blog site) – he’s a very proud Oaklander and great guy and I’m sure would have the info on that plan.
Bush – during OMB appointment speech: “America accounts for 5% of the worlds population. That means that 95% of potential customers are overseas.”
Maybe that’s why our borders haven’t been secured — he thinks we are completely surrounded by oceans and we don’t really need to do anything about securing them. He must not realize that he can walk across either Mexican or Canadian borders. Maybe a geography lesson should be edited in to “My Pet Goat.”
Awful quiet this morning… Where is everybody?
Mary (21) — thanks for posting that link, heard about the story but hadn’t been able to scout the link yet. Will read immediately after this thread.
Dan Lewis (30) — wow, I may skip the rest of this thread; Bernstein points to “The Dog That Didn’t Bark” within that comment you excerpted from Bernstein’s essay.
If America was under attack, why didn’t the Secret Service immediately whisk the President away to safety? For that matter, if an entire American city was flooded, why wasn’t Bush on the phone making calls instead of fly-bys?
Dog. Not. Barking.
Why?
JaneKnowles #81; if you follow the link and read TBoggs comments you will find no disagreement…
twolf1 — Need to do some homework ASAP on Portman. NPR report says “Portman helped Bush win Ohio”, which to my mind means he is dirty…and that Bolten just named a fox to guard the hen house.
Okay, no furth prod needed…Google-ing Portman + “Toledo Blade” now…
New thread upstairs
Lets have dinner, Jane. ;-)
TBogg is so quick to tar a woman journalist (when you stop being useful to him, you just be a “dumb bitch” too) that he crops the Givhan article unfairly. It’s not briliant, but if you read the whole thing, it’s not pointless tripe either. Here are the two concluding paragraphs:
Dressing appropriately is a somewhat selfless act. It’s not about catering to personal comfort. One can’t give in fully to private aesthetic preferences. Instead, one asks what would make other people feel respected? What would mark the occasion as noteworthy? What signifies that the moment is bigger than the individual?
But the Roberts family went too far. In announcing John Roberts as his Supreme Court nominee, the president inextricably linked the individual — and his family — to the sweep of tradition. In their attire, there was nothing too informal; there was nothing immodest. There was only the feeling that, in the desire to be appropriate and respectful of history, the children had been costumed in it.
In light of his role in the Wen Ho Lee affair, I don’t consider Risen to be worthy of anything at all.
Hey Jane — you’re in town? Gimme a ringy-dingy!
@ Dru/98: I did follow the link, and I couldn’t figure out the take though admittedly I’m sleep-deprived and given how tough Jane tends to be on the Post (and how people in general regard all things fashion-related), I figured the scales were tipping in the direction of disgust with her winning an award.
Anyway, I should add that I am very happy for her. A couple years back, I read an article by her that inspired me to figure out her email address (the Post lists some addresses online but not others but it’s easy to guess what one’s might be), and sent her an email complimenting her. I 100 percent sure she had no clue who I was, but she still responded with a very humble and gracious thank you.
If there is one common attribute many of the Pulitzer winners share, it is holding up a mirror to the scandals and corruption of the Bush administration and his Republican Party.
For the details, see:
“The GOP’s Pulitzer Prize Winning Scandals.”
JaneK 104; I can see how it could be interpreted either way; My take was that it was amusing to see a Pulitzer for politicofashion snark! (And fwiw; I do recall a discussion about gowns on Oscar night here at fdl!!)
How in the hell could the NYT win a Pulitzer for a story they held onto for a year (until after the election)? This is reporting?
I heartily endorse the idea of anti-Pulitzers. Take as a model the Golden Raspberries–which are awarded on the eve of the Oscars. Maybe time to start planning for a ceremony for next year on the eve of the Pulitzers….
Wasn’t Risen (along with Pincus) one of the guys who lead the charge to smear Gary Webb who exposed CIA involvement with drug running?