<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Big Digs in the Desert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:35:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Waxing</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-111135</link>
		<dc:creator>Waxing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 12:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-111135</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Homemade wax&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;homemade wax, madam tuso, meguires,&lt;br /&gt;
zaino car wax&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Homemade wax</strong></p>
<p>homemade wax, madam tuso, meguires,<br />
zaino car wax</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LuckyLindy</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-69464</link>
		<dc:creator>LuckyLindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-69464</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Did everyone else notice that I. Lewis Libby was a contributor or participant for the PNAC document posted as a .pdf in a prior post.  He’s listed on the last page. Great example of how these guys are inserted all over our governemnt.  What a web.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did everyone else notice that I. Lewis Libby was a contributor or participant for the PNAC document posted as a .pdf in a prior post.  He’s listed on the last page. Great example of how these guys are inserted all over our governemnt.  What a web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noen</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-69119</link>
		<dc:creator>noen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 01:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-69119</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;“I had never ever considered a military coup in the US a welcome prospect. But Iâ€™ve been thinking that maybe the big money folks in the financial sector â€“which would be devastated by the blowback of an attack on Iranâ€“and the rebels in the Pentagon could get together with Patrick Fitzgerald and work out a scenario in which inditements would be issued against Bush/Cheny, backed up by a threat from the Pentagon to remove them forcefully from office if they donâ€™t resign, in order to restore the Constitution.”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry, won’t happen. The “big money folks in the financial sector” have already moved their holdings to more secure depositories off shore and elsewhere. They will sit back and watch us drown in our debt. Just as they sat back and watched the stock market crash of 29. The truly wealthy suffered no losses on that day and won’t on any future crash either. Probably about time for another “harvest” anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“I had never ever considered a military coup in the US a welcome prospect. But Iâ€™ve been thinking that maybe the big money folks in the financial sector â€“which would be devastated by the blowback of an attack on Iranâ€“and the rebels in the Pentagon could get together with Patrick Fitzgerald and work out a scenario in which inditements would be issued against Bush/Cheny, backed up by a threat from the Pentagon to remove them forcefully from office if they donâ€™t resign, in order to restore the Constitution.”</i></p>
<p>Sorry, won’t happen. The “big money folks in the financial sector” have already moved their holdings to more secure depositories off shore and elsewhere. They will sit back and watch us drown in our debt. Just as they sat back and watched the stock market crash of 29. The truly wealthy suffered no losses on that day and won’t on any future crash either. Probably about time for another “harvest” anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-68263</link>
		<dc:creator>3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-68263</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“Weâ€™re not colonizing a country. Weâ€™re colonizing the Middle East.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yeah, see, it’s Darth Dick’em’s take on economic globalization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead of outsourcing jobs, we invade countries, thereby creating new employment opportunities for Americans right there in the colonies.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Weâ€™re not colonizing a country. Weâ€™re colonizing the Middle East.”</p>
<p>Yeah, see, it’s Darth Dick’em’s take on economic globalization.</p>
<p>Instead of outsourcing jobs, we invade countries, thereby creating new employment opportunities for Americans right there in the colonies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-68258</link>
		<dc:creator>3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-68258</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, at least the contract didn’t go to Bin Laden  Construction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I guess.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least the contract didn’t go to Bin Laden  Construction.</p>
<p>I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shargash</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-68156</link>
		<dc:creator>shargash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-68156</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;When you colonize a country…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We’re not colonizing a country. We’re colonizing the Middle East.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When you colonize a country…</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We’re not colonizing a country. We’re colonizing the Middle East.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clueless</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-68111</link>
		<dc:creator>clueless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 22:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-68111</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;26 cathy says: &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;April 15th, 2006 at 7:22 am &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Taylor-&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1.Haliburton&lt;br /&gt;
2.Haliburton&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3.Haliburton&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did I name the companies correctly? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cathy - you missed two. The article said FIVE companies. Here’s two more to add to your three:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. Haliburton&lt;br /&gt;
5. Haliburton&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That should take care of the entire list!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>26 cathy says: </i></p>
<p>April 15th, 2006 at 7:22 am </p>
<p>Taylor-</p>
<p>1.Haliburton<br />
2.Haliburton</p>
<p>3.Haliburton</p>
<p>Did I name the companies correctly? </p>
<p>cathy &#8211; you missed two. The article said FIVE companies. Here’s two more to add to your three:</p>
<p>4. Haliburton<br />
5. Haliburton</p>
<p>That should take care of the entire list!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clueless</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-68105</link>
		<dc:creator>clueless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 22:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-68105</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;19 kurotenshi says: &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;April 15th, 2006 at 7:11 am&lt;br /&gt;
â€œScore one more for our cultural sensitivity&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Temple of Babylon now a U.S. helipad and parking lotâ€¦â€&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This sickens me to the core. Antiquities are far more finite than oil and our inability to protect what is not only a source of pride for Iraqis, but also for civilization in general, leaves us without the most powerful commonality we share - history. Seeing how Egypt has successfully harnessed itâ€™s role as a vibrant and far-reaching culture through itâ€™s own atiquities and worldwide interest therein; I find it hard to believe that we could of not done the same with Iraq in order to strengthen common bonds and shared historical values.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This may be part of the problem as to why we are not protecting Iraqi antiquities: Wouldn’t the rightwing nutjobs hate to discover antiquities that might be so old that they seriously impair the concept of Creationism??? Don’t the nutjobs claim that the whole world is only something like 6,000 years old? If Indiana Jones were to discover a jug that is 7,000 years old…….well there’d be a lotta splainin to do!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>19 kurotenshi says: </i></p>
<p>April 15th, 2006 at 7:11 am<br />
â€œScore one more for our cultural sensitivity</p>
<p>Temple of Babylon now a U.S. helipad and parking lotâ€¦â€</p>
<p>This sickens me to the core. Antiquities are far more finite than oil and our inability to protect what is not only a source of pride for Iraqis, but also for civilization in general, leaves us without the most powerful commonality we share &#8211; history. Seeing how Egypt has successfully harnessed itâ€™s role as a vibrant and far-reaching culture through itâ€™s own atiquities and worldwide interest therein; I find it hard to believe that we could of not done the same with Iraq in order to strengthen common bonds and shared historical values.</p>
<p>This may be part of the problem as to why we are not protecting Iraqi antiquities: Wouldn’t the rightwing nutjobs hate to discover antiquities that might be so old that they seriously impair the concept of Creationism??? Don’t the nutjobs claim that the whole world is only something like 6,000 years old? If Indiana Jones were to discover a jug that is 7,000 years old…….well there’d be a lotta splainin to do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arcturus</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-68069</link>
		<dc:creator>Arcturus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 21:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-68069</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Since no one has mentioned it, Dahr Jamail wrote about the permanent military bases &amp; the embassy last month, in his piece &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/031306A.shtml&quot;&gt;Iraq: Permanent US Colony&lt;/a&gt; in the light of military planning documents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;It appears as though “mission accomplished” in Iraq was not necessarily referring to guarding the Ministry of Oil and occupying the country indefinitely (or finding WMDs, disrupting al-Qaeda, or liberating Iraqis, blah-blah-blah), but to having a military beach-head in the heart of the Middle East. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that while US officials don’t dare say the word “permanent” when referring to military bases in Iraq, they will say “permanent access.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since no one has mentioned it, Dahr Jamail wrote about the permanent military bases &amp; the embassy last month, in his piece <a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/031306A.shtml">Iraq: Permanent US Colony</a> in the light of military planning documents.</p>
<blockquote><p>It appears as though “mission accomplished” in Iraq was not necessarily referring to guarding the Ministry of Oil and occupying the country indefinitely (or finding WMDs, disrupting al-Qaeda, or liberating Iraqis, blah-blah-blah), but to having a military beach-head in the heart of the Middle East. </p>
<p>Note that while US officials don’t dare say the word “permanent” when referring to military bases in Iraq, they will say “permanent access.”</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: concerned</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-68064</link>
		<dc:creator>concerned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 21:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/15/our-big-digs-in-the-desert/#comment-68064</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hm, did we ASK our government to build that ?&lt;br /&gt;
I think we should be protesting very loudly about this ! Sure, they can say that they’re hiding this for security reasons, but maybe it’s because they know what they’re doing is WRONG.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hm, did we ASK our government to build that ?<br />
I think we should be protesting very loudly about this ! Sure, they can say that they’re hiding this for security reasons, but maybe it’s because they know what they’re doing is WRONG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
