<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuevo Plumbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/</link>
	<description>Firedoglake weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:49:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tiparillo</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-64118</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiparillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 22:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-64118</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Phoenix Woman:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Karl Rove oversaw (oversees?) the White House Office of Political Affairs where the calls were made to.  And several Bush 2004 campaign staffers, including Kenny Mehlman and Coddy Johnson were in the Political Affairs office at the time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phoenix Woman:</p>
<p>Karl Rove oversaw (oversees?) the White House Office of Political Affairs where the calls were made to.  And several Bush 2004 campaign staffers, including Kenny Mehlman and Coddy Johnson were in the Political Affairs office at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: looseheadprop</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63812</link>
		<dc:creator>looseheadprop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63812</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mary,&lt;br /&gt;
Know I am EPU’d here, but thought you may check back.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WOW. that was some nice piece of work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Re: You last entry. Fitz’s 4 term expired. He is now a holder terminable at will. Let them dare try it though!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary,<br />
Know I am EPU’d here, but thought you may check back.</p>
<p>WOW. that was some nice piece of work.</p>
<p>Re: You last entry. Fitz’s 4 term expired. He is now a holder terminable at will. Let them dare try it though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: segmentation fault</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63603</link>
		<dc:creator>segmentation fault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63603</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;can we fucking impeach bush yet?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can we fucking impeach bush yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayne</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63601</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63601</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mary (107) — good job!  you might find more at Cooperative Research&lt;br /&gt;
(http://www.cooperativeresearch.org).  If you aren’t already a member, consider joining ePluribusMedia and adding your timeline to the PlameCIA timeline there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**ATTN. FDL’RS** Cooperative Research has been a fantastic open source repository of research into 9/11, Iraq and Katrina.  Unfortunately they are out of money and need your help.  Donations are tax-deductible (yay!).  Go to the link above to help if you can, even $10 bucks will help keep them online.  Be sure to browse the research at their site while we still can…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary (107) — good job!  you might find more at Cooperative Research<br />
(<a href="http://www.cooperativeresearch.org)" rel="nofollow">http://www.cooperativeresearch.org)</a>.  If you aren’t already a member, consider joining ePluribusMedia and adding your timeline to the PlameCIA timeline there.</p>
<p>**ATTN. FDL’RS** Cooperative Research has been a fantastic open source repository of research into 9/11, Iraq and Katrina.  Unfortunately they are out of money and need your help.  Donations are tax-deductible (yay!).  Go to the link above to help if you can, even $10 bucks will help keep them online.  Be sure to browse the research at their site while we still can…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christofay</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63538</link>
		<dc:creator>christofay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63538</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The red welfare state continues. Farming price supports are a form of socialism, basically welfare. Bidless business to Halliburton, those Houston guys can’t compete in the international mega-scale building project business, they need a government hand-out to stay competitive. Plus all those do-nothing national security companies like MZM, the trough that Cunningham fed at, again is just welfare for white boys with a pretty bow put on it so they don’t have to live with the stigma of receiving govt hand-outs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The red welfare state continues. Farming price supports are a form of socialism, basically welfare. Bidless business to Halliburton, those Houston guys can’t compete in the international mega-scale building project business, they need a government hand-out to stay competitive. Plus all those do-nothing national security companies like MZM, the trough that Cunningham fed at, again is just welfare for white boys with a pretty bow put on it so they don’t have to live with the stigma of receiving govt hand-outs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike g</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63468</link>
		<dc:creator>mike g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63468</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;brace yourself for this excuse: if the president leaks the name of a covert cia officer, then it’s not illegal.  how else does novak have absolute certainty, unless bush leaked it himself or was on the phone?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brace yourself for this excuse: if the president leaks the name of a covert cia officer, then it’s not illegal.  how else does novak have absolute certainty, unless bush leaked it himself or was on the phone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63407</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 03:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63407</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Republicans are racists, I totally agree with that.  The red state map::confederacy map identity really convinced me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But you just need to talk with Republicans in red districts to know it’s all about the “welfare state” and the sacrifices they make for people who don’t want to work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ironically (for them), it is the blue states that wind up supporting red districts through federal taxes!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let those boony-towns decay, let their crazed leaders howl in the night (how’s that for drama), and let the metropolitan areas on the east and west coasts thrive.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 100 years the hicks, in their empty and unpainted districts with dusty and potholed roads, the hill people will still be fighting for creationism and blaming someone else for their stupidity.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republicans are racists, I totally agree with that.  The red state map::confederacy map identity really convinced me.</p>
<p>But you just need to talk with Republicans in red districts to know it’s all about the “welfare state” and the sacrifices they make for people who don’t want to work.</p>
<p>Ironically (for them), it is the blue states that wind up supporting red districts through federal taxes!</p>
<p>Let those boony-towns decay, let their crazed leaders howl in the night (how’s that for drama), and let the metropolitan areas on the east and west coasts thrive.  </p>
<p>In 100 years the hicks, in their empty and unpainted districts with dusty and potholed roads, the hill people will still be fighting for creationism and blaming someone else for their stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAB</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63380</link>
		<dc:creator>DAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 03:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63380</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Re: the nuclear option-my fear is it is the only toy in the WH playroom that Georgie boy hasn’t played with yet. What do kids often too when they are told not to play anymore and get ready for bed? AND re: NH,  can’t George just ask the NSA who were the parties of the phone calls.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: the nuclear option-my fear is it is the only toy in the WH playroom that Georgie boy hasn’t played with yet. What do kids often too when they are told not to play anymore and get ready for bed? AND re: NH,  can’t George just ask the NSA who were the parties of the phone calls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63365</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 03:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63365</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OT, but where else to put it? Here’s my shot at a timeline on some of the Niger/Libby/Wilson etc. info. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is just a draft and no claim to highest and best sourcing, or even reliable sourcing, yet at least, but here is the time line I get for the Niger to Libby disclosures, to lawsuit info.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	1.  &lt;b&gt;Fall of 2001, soon after 9/11&lt;/b&gt;&lt;i&gt;the C.I.A. received an intelligence report from Italyâ€™s Military Intelligence and Security Service, or sismi, about a public visit that Wissam al-Zahawie, then the Iraqi Ambassador to the Vatican, had made to Niger and three other African nations two and a half years earlier, in February, 1999.&lt;/i&gt; While nothing was made of this at the time (1999), as the story goes,  SISSMI takes another look after 9/11 and suggests Zahawie was really there to buy yellow cake.   The  VP sees this info, which had not documentary support, and brings it up in his daily CIA briefing â€“ briefer chcks it out, tells VP there are no details.  VPâ€™s Press Sec. Cathie Martin say at this point,  &lt;i&gt;. â€œEnd of story,â€ Martin added. â€œThatâ€™s all we know.&lt;/i&gt;  However, a CIA source tells Hersh that Cheney &lt;i&gt; asked the agency to review the matter once again&lt;/i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact&quot;&gt;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/.....027fa_fact&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	2. &lt;b&gt;November 14, 2001&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;as the Taliban were being routed in Afghanistan, Richard Perle, a Pentagon consultant with long-standing ties to Wolfowitz, Feith, and Chalabi, articulated what would become the Bush Administrationâ€™s most compelling argument for going to war with Iraq: the possibility that, with enough time, Saddam Hussein would be capable of attacking the United States with a nuclear weapon. &lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact&quot;&gt;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/.....027fa_fact&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	3.  &lt;b&gt;December, 2001&lt;/b&gt;, INR major review of Iraqâ€™s progress on WMDs, finding no progress, completed and provided to Colin Powell.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact&quot;&gt;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/.....027fa_fact&lt;/a&gt; (nonsequitor but article also details Bolton managing to get direct access to electronic surveillance data) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	4.  &lt;b&gt;Early 2002 and January 30, 2002&lt;/b&gt; SISMI intel begins to play a role in decision making and 1-30  CIA report &lt;i&gt; C.I.A. published an unclassified report to Congress that stated, â€œBaghdad may be attempting to acquire materials that could aid in reconstituting its nuclear-weapons program.â€ A week later, Colin Powell told the House International Relations Committee, â€œWith respect to the nuclear program, there is no doubt that the Iraqis are pursuing it.â€ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact&quot;&gt;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/.....027fa_fact&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	5.  &lt;b&gt;Late February, 2002 &lt;/b&gt;  CIA sends Wilson to â€œdiscreetly check it outâ€ and is told that CIA has received a copy of a memorandum of agreement.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact&quot;&gt;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/.....027fa_fact&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	6.  &lt;b&gt;eight/nine days later&lt;/b&gt;  Wilson comes back, makes report, says he assumes the VP got it.  VPâ€™s Press Sec, Cathie Martin, says, &lt;i&gt;â€œThe Vice-President doesnâ€™t know Joe Wilson and did not know about his trip until he read about it in the press.â€ The first press accounts appeared fifteen months after Wilsonâ€™s trip.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact&quot;&gt;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/.....027fa_fact&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	7.  Leaving out all the reports and memos re: whether Pres had already made up his mind by about March 2002 to go to war in Iraq, but lots of things floating around about that time and later, some maybe earlier (eg, recent report about Cheney requests for Iraq briefings right after 2000 vote count) .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	8.  &lt;b&gt;August 7, 2002&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;Vice-President Cheney, speaking in California, said of Saddam Hussein, â€œWhat we know now, from various sources, is that he . . . continues to pursue a nuclear weapon.â€&lt;br /&gt;
	 []&lt;b&gt;August 26th, [2002] &lt;/b&gt;Cheney suggested that Saddam had a nuclear capability that could directly threaten â€œanyone he chooses, in his own region or beyond.â€ He added that the Iraqis were continuing â€œto pursue the nuclear program they began so many years ago.â€&lt;br /&gt;
	 []&lt;b&gt;September 8th, [2002]&lt;/b&gt;he told a television interviewer, â€œWe do know, with absolute certainty, that he is using his procurement system to acquire the equipment he needs in order to enrich uranium to build a nuclear weapon.â€&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact&quot;&gt;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/.....027fa_fact&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	9.  &lt;b&gt;September 8, 2002&lt;/b&gt;  Rice, the National Security Adviser, says in an interview, â€œWe donâ€™t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloudâ€ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact&quot;&gt;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/.....027fa_fact&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	10.  &lt;b&gt;September 14, 2002&lt;/b&gt; the President makes his radio address and says, &lt;i&gt;â€œSaddam Hussein has the scientists and infrastructure for a nuclear-weapons program, and has illicitly sought to purchase the equipment needed to enrich uranium for a nuclear weapon.â€&lt;/i&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact&quot;&gt;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/.....027fa_fact&lt;/a&gt;  [All this time, 2002 elections and the force resolution are coming up. ]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	11.  &lt;b&gt;September, 2002&lt;/b&gt;, Members of Congress (Durbin and Graham in particular) request an NIE before Iraq vote;, Bush was not going to get one before sending troops to invade.  (NSA = National Security Archives for this timeline) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	12.  &lt;b&gt;September 24, 2002, &lt;/b&gt; Tony Blair comes out with dramatic allegations about Iraq trying to purchase uranium based largely on the SISMI information. (According to a parliamentary inquiry, stronger language in the report is toned down after the CIA cautions its British counterpart and references to SISMI as the sourcing are dropped, even though they form the primary basis of the British report.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	13  &lt;b&gt;Oct. 1, 2002.&lt;/b&gt;Classified version completed &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	14.    &lt;b&gt;October 4, 2002&lt;/b&gt;, Tenet releases an unclassified paper &lt;i&gt;Iraqâ€™s Weapons of Mass Destruction programs&lt;/i&gt; (White Paper)  Per the later Senate investigation report, the White Paper was missing many of the caveats in the key judgments and was also missing some of the references to alternative views .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	15.  &lt;b&gt;October 5, 2002&lt;/b&gt;  memo from CIA to Bushâ€™s speechwriter, Michael Gerson and deputy National Security Adviser, Stephen Hadley, objecting to reference in proposed Cincinnati speech for Bush about Hussein trying to obtain yellowcake;&lt;br /&gt;
	      &lt;b&gt;October 6, 2002&lt;/b&gt; second CIA memo, this one to Rice and Hadley, more specifically referring to â€œweaknessâ€ in the evidence; and&lt;br /&gt;
	      &lt;b&gt; Right before the speech&lt;/b&gt; call from Tenet to Hadley requesting the reference come out â€“ it did not appear in the speech.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/1BlogArchive/2005_11_01_dsmemo_archive.html&quot;&gt;http://www.downingstreetmemo.c.....chive.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	16.  &lt;b&gt;October 7, 2002 &lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt; President Bush said, â€œFacing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proofâ€”the smoking gunâ€”that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.â€&lt;/i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact&quot;&gt;http://www.newyorker.com/fact/.....027fa_fact&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	17.  &lt;b&gt;October 13, 2002&lt;/b&gt; Wilson writes an op piece for San Jose Mercury News, critical of the run up to war and                  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politicsoftruth.com/editorials/saddam.html&quot;&gt;http://www.politicsoftruth.com.....addam.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	18.  &lt;b&gt;Oct. 16, 2002&lt;/b&gt; Iraq force authorization (passed Oct 5??) is memorialized &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.c-span.org/resources/pdf/hjres114.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.c-span.org/resources/pdf/hjres114.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	19.  &lt;b&gt;January ___, 2003&lt;/b&gt; National Intelligence Council issues memo that the Niger story is baseless and should be laid to rest. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/08/AR2006040800916.html&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....00916.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	20.  &lt;b&gt;January 28, 2003&lt;/b&gt; Presidentâ€™s SOTUS, with 16 words, â€œ”the British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.” That sentence came in the homestretch of saying that Iraq was ”assembling the world’s most dangerous weapons.” The sentence was part of building the case that ”the gravest danger facing America and the world is outlaw regimes that seek and possess nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	21.  &lt;b&gt;February 6, 2003&lt;/b&gt; Colin Powell addresses UN with â€œproofâ€ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/05/sprj.irq.powell.transcript/&quot;&gt;http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/.....ranscript/&lt;/a&gt; and doesnâ€™t mention the Niger issue. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	22.  &lt;b&gt;March 13, 2003 &lt;/b&gt; al-Baradei and IAEA say Niger docs obvious fakes and some resulting uproar.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/14/sprj.irq.documents/index.html&quot;&gt;http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/.....index.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;But the discovery raises questions such as why the apparent forgeries were given to inspectors and why U.S. and British intelligence agents did not recognize that they were not authentic â€¦ A &lt;b&gt;U.S. intelligence official said that the documents were passed on &lt;/b&gt;to the International Atomic Energy Agency &lt;b&gt;within days of being received&lt;/b&gt; with the comment, ” ‘We don’t know the provenance of this information, but here it is.’ ” If a mistake was made, a U.S. official suggested, it was more likely due to incompetence not malice. “That’s a convenient explanation, but it doesn’t satisfy me,” [Ray] Close [a former CIA official] said. “Incompetence I have not seen in those agencies. I’ve seen plenty of malice, but I’ve never seen incompetence.” &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	23.  &lt;b&gt;Sometime in March&lt;/b&gt; Wilson claims there is a meeting of Cheney staff and/or others at which investigating Wilson was planned.   Cheney denies.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-04-29-cheney-cia-leak_x.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.usatoday.com/news/w.....leak_x.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	24.  &lt;b&gt;June 3, 2003 and effective July 11, 2003&lt;/b&gt; Tenet announces his resignation. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12296-2004Jun3.html&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....4Jun3.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	25.  &lt;b&gt; June, 2003&lt;/b&gt; British parliamentary inquiry debunks Blairâ€™s claim that, even though the Niger docs were forgeries, he and Bush had â€œother, secret evidenceâ€ they could not disclose.  This leaves the WH edgy and fingerpointy.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/08/AR2006040800916.html&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....00916.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	26.  &lt;b&gt;Sometime in June, 2003&lt;/b&gt; President decides to â€œdeclassifyâ€ â€œpartsâ€ of the NIE, (resurrecting the â€œparts is partsâ€ chicken nugget battles) (no, WaPo didnâ€™t mention the nuggets, but a scoops a scoop, and parts are parts).  He directs that Cheney â€œget it outâ€ &lt;a href=&quot;http://wireservice.wired.com/wired/story.asp?section=Politics&amp;storyId=1508945&quot;&gt;http://wireservice.wired.com/w.....Id=1508945&lt;/a&gt; but with no other details.  OR the maybe the same, maybe alternative version, &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/pnjqv&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/pnjqv&lt;/a&gt; Bush did not authorize anyone to release the information to reporters. Apparently what he â€œdeclassifiedâ€ (in the parts sense), were the Key Judgments from the NIE, which had been, in a â€œtake out the qualificationsâ€ sense in Tenetâ€™s white paper, plus a couple of paragraphs that were not Key Judgments but alluded to the yellowcake and aluminum tubes claims made by the VP, P, NSAdv. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/iraq-wmd.html,&quot;&gt;http://www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/iraq-wmd.html,&lt;/a&gt;  IMO, the typed up reports of what was released do not do justice to the pdf of what was released and how it looked.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB129/nie_judgments.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/N.....gments.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
since that is what was ultimately released on July 18, 2003.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/08/AR2006040800916.html  IMO, the typed up reports of what was released do not do justice to the pdf of what was released and how it looked.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB129/nie_judgments.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/N.....gments.pdf&lt;/a&gt;  At this point, no allegations or references that the President authorized the leaking of Plameâ€™s identity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	27.  &lt;b&gt;Sometime at the end of June/beginning of July??&lt;/b&gt; Cheney tells Libby to make revelations of portions of the NIE ; Libby balks, Cheney tells Libby that the President has authorized the release of the information, Libby speaks with Addington (but does not include him in the â€œthree people who knewâ€) and Addington tells him that the authorization from the President is tantamount to a declassification.  All from Libbyâ€™s GJ testimony, per the Special Prosecutorâ€™s Memorandum and does not mention any authorization by anyone to mention Plameâ€™s identity. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	28.  &lt;b&gt; June 23, 2003,&lt;/b&gt; Judy Miller and Libby meet, an incident that slips their minds (perhaps as the story takes form that the OVP and WH interest in Wilson only came about after his July op ed?) and she took notes.  Subject???  [Possibly some references from this period of time to restrictions on Millerâ€™s writing for the NYT vis a vis WMD and Iraq â€“ but I have no cite/info so ???  Also not clear if Libby knows]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	29.  &lt;b&gt;June 26/27??, 2003&lt;/b&gt; Libby and Woodward (working on book) meet and Libby mentions info apparently from the NIE.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/08/AR2006040800916.html&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....00916.html&lt;/a&gt;  (Woodward also met with someone who mentioned Plame prior to the July 8 meeting between Libby and Miller, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10117465/site/newsweek/&quot;&gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10...../newsweek/&lt;/a&gt; and Woodward also finds Libbyâ€™s handwriting neat and organized and should probably be called upon to help transliterate, donâ€™t you think?)  From the Newsweek article, we learn that both Woodward and Novak are convinced the Plame leaks will end up being â€œnothing.â€ Woodward also admits knowing Novaks source when it comes out that he had the discussions/meetings he had at the WH)(and we also know that Novak is â€œabsolutely sureâ€ the President knows who did the Plame leaking). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	30. &lt;b&gt;Beginning sometime on or before the beginning of July, 2003&lt;/b&gt; Hadley and others are lobbying the WH to declassify parts of the NIE and are not advised, at least not through 7-8-03, that the President has already done that or started the process. &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/pnjqv&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/pnjqv&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	31.  &lt;b&gt; July 6, 2003&lt;/b&gt; Wilsonâ€™s â€œWhat I Did Not Find In Africaâ€ piece. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	32.  &lt;b&gt;July 8, 2003&lt;/b&gt; Libby meets with Miller, discusses NIE sections referring to a sheet he has brought with him [who prepared and what was on it and does Spec Prosec have it?] and specifies that he understood he was to tell her that the vigorous pursuit of yellowcake was one of the Key Judgments of the NIE (it was not and, by this point, had been pretty much disproven  in any event unless there was additional â€œsecretâ€ evidence, which there was not and had been shot down in the parliamentary inquiry report released in June).  Other than the parenthetical â€“ Libbyâ€™s GJ testimony as referred to in Spec. Prosec. Memorandum. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	33.  &lt;b&gt;July 8, 2003 &lt;/b&gt;Air Force One trip  to So. Africa with Card, Fleischer, Powell, the Memo naming Plame, and Rice.&lt;br /&gt;
	34. &lt;b&gt;Sometime in July, 2003&lt;/b&gt; Tenet takes responsibility for the 16 words.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/usa/george-tenet/&quot;&gt;http://www.rotten.com/library/.....rge-tenet/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	35. &lt;b&gt;July 13, 2003&lt;/b&gt; Novak article outing Plameâ€™s covert CIA identity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	36.  &lt;b&gt;July 18, 2003, &lt;/b&gt; the Key Judgements, plus additional paragraphs, were released to reporters.  Full NIE has never been released.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	37. &lt;b&gt; July 23, 2003&lt;/b&gt;  Hadley takes blame for 16 words.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3088597.stm&quot;&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3088597.stm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	38.  &lt;b&gt;September, 2003&lt;/b&gt; meeting with Powell, where statement is made about â€œeveryone knowingâ€ (unclear context). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	39.  &lt;b&gt;Septeber 26, 2003,&lt;/b&gt; CIA directs DOJ to initiate investigation. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	40.  &lt;b&gt; September 29, 2003, (8:30 PM)&lt;/b&gt; Gonzales notified by DOJ (at request of CIA) an investigation has been opened, preserve all materials. Gonzales tells only Card at first, then 12 hours later staff.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	41.  &lt;b&gt;October 3, 2003&lt;/b&gt; Comey appointed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/10/20031003-7.html&quot;&gt;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news.....003-7.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	42.  &lt;b&gt;December 23, 2003&lt;/b&gt; Daschle sends letter to Ashcroft asking for a special prosecutor. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	43. &lt;b&gt;December 26, 2003&lt;/b&gt; Post reports investigation gaining momentum&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	45.  &lt;b&gt;December 30, 2003&lt;/b&gt; Fitzgerald appointed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	46. &lt;b&gt;January 2, 2004 &lt;/b&gt; reports that FBI is having WH staffers sign releases for reporters of confidentiality they may have given their sources. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	47 &lt;b&gt;February 6, 2004&lt;/b&gt; Fitzgerald receives letter clarifying scope. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	48.  &lt;b&gt;November 10, 2004&lt;/b&gt; Bush announces Gonzales for AG.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	49.  &lt;b&gt;April 20, 2005 &lt;/b&gt; Comey announces resignation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	50.&lt;b&gt;October 28, 2005, &lt;/b&gt; Libby Indicted&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	51. &lt;b&gt;October, 2005&lt;/b&gt; Fitzgeraldâ€™s appointment as US Atty in ND IL is/was up.  Renominated/reappointed????&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT, but where else to put it? Here’s my shot at a timeline on some of the Niger/Libby/Wilson etc. info. </p>
<p>This is just a draft and no claim to highest and best sourcing, or even reliable sourcing, yet at least, but here is the time line I get for the Niger to Libby disclosures, to lawsuit info.  </p>
<p>	1.  <b>Fall of 2001, soon after 9/11</b><i>the C.I.A. received an intelligence report from Italyâ€™s Military Intelligence and Security Service, or sismi, about a public visit that Wissam al-Zahawie, then the Iraqi Ambassador to the Vatican, had made to Niger and three other African nations two and a half years earlier, in February, 1999.</i> While nothing was made of this at the time (1999), as the story goes,  SISSMI takes another look after 9/11 and suggests Zahawie was really there to buy yellow cake.   The  VP sees this info, which had not documentary support, and brings it up in his daily CIA briefing â€“ briefer chcks it out, tells VP there are no details.  VPâ€™s Press Sec. Cathie Martin say at this point,  <i>. â€œEnd of story,â€ Martin added. â€œThatâ€™s all we know.</i>  However, a CIA source tells Hersh that Cheney <i> asked the agency to review the matter once again</i><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact">http://www.newyorker.com/fact/&#8230;..027fa_fact</a></p>
<p>	2. <b>November 14, 2001</b> <i>as the Taliban were being routed in Afghanistan, Richard Perle, a Pentagon consultant with long-standing ties to Wolfowitz, Feith, and Chalabi, articulated what would become the Bush Administrationâ€™s most compelling argument for going to war with Iraq: the possibility that, with enough time, Saddam Hussein would be capable of attacking the United States with a nuclear weapon. </i> <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact">http://www.newyorker.com/fact/&#8230;..027fa_fact</a>  </p>
<p>	3.  <b>December, 2001</b>, INR major review of Iraqâ€™s progress on WMDs, finding no progress, completed and provided to Colin Powell.  <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact">http://www.newyorker.com/fact/&#8230;..027fa_fact</a> (nonsequitor but article also details Bolton managing to get direct access to electronic surveillance data) </p>
<p>	4.  <b>Early 2002 and January 30, 2002</b> SISMI intel begins to play a role in decision making and 1-30  CIA report <i> C.I.A. published an unclassified report to Congress that stated, â€œBaghdad may be attempting to acquire materials that could aid in reconstituting its nuclear-weapons program.â€ A week later, Colin Powell told the House International Relations Committee, â€œWith respect to the nuclear program, there is no doubt that the Iraqis are pursuing it.â€ <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact">http://www.newyorker.com/fact/&#8230;..027fa_fact</a></i></p>
<p>	5.  <b>Late February, 2002 </b>  CIA sends Wilson to â€œdiscreetly check it outâ€ and is told that CIA has received a copy of a memorandum of agreement.  <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact">http://www.newyorker.com/fact/&#8230;..027fa_fact</a></p>
<p>	6.  <b>eight/nine days later</b>  Wilson comes back, makes report, says he assumes the VP got it.  VPâ€™s Press Sec, Cathie Martin, says, <i>â€œThe Vice-President doesnâ€™t know Joe Wilson and did not know about his trip until he read about it in the press.â€ The first press accounts appeared fifteen months after Wilsonâ€™s trip.</i><br />
<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact">http://www.newyorker.com/fact/&#8230;..027fa_fact</a></p>
<p>	7.  Leaving out all the reports and memos re: whether Pres had already made up his mind by about March 2002 to go to war in Iraq, but lots of things floating around about that time and later, some maybe earlier (eg, recent report about Cheney requests for Iraq briefings right after 2000 vote count) .</p>
<p>	8.  <b>August 7, 2002</b> <i>Vice-President Cheney, speaking in California, said of Saddam Hussein, â€œWhat we know now, from various sources, is that he . . . continues to pursue a nuclear weapon.â€<br />
	 []<b>August 26th, [2002] </b>Cheney suggested that Saddam had a nuclear capability that could directly threaten â€œanyone he chooses, in his own region or beyond.â€ He added that the Iraqis were continuing â€œto pursue the nuclear program they began so many years ago.â€<br />
	 []<b>September 8th, [2002]</b>he told a television interviewer, â€œWe do know, with absolute certainty, that he is using his procurement system to acquire the equipment he needs in order to enrich uranium to build a nuclear weapon.â€<br />
<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact">http://www.newyorker.com/fact/&#8230;..027fa_fact</a> </i></p>
<p>	9.  <b>September 8, 2002</b>  Rice, the National Security Adviser, says in an interview, â€œWe donâ€™t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloudâ€ <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact">http://www.newyorker.com/fact/&#8230;..027fa_fact</a></p>
<p>	10.  <b>September 14, 2002</b> the President makes his radio address and says, <i>â€œSaddam Hussein has the scientists and infrastructure for a nuclear-weapons program, and has illicitly sought to purchase the equipment needed to enrich uranium for a nuclear weapon.â€</i>  <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact">http://www.newyorker.com/fact/&#8230;..027fa_fact</a>  [All this time, 2002 elections and the force resolution are coming up. ]</p>
<p>	11.  <b>September, 2002</b>, Members of Congress (Durbin and Graham in particular) request an NIE before Iraq vote;, Bush was not going to get one before sending troops to invade.  (NSA = National Security Archives for this timeline) </p>
<p>	12.  <b>September 24, 2002, </b> Tony Blair comes out with dramatic allegations about Iraq trying to purchase uranium based largely on the SISMI information. (According to a parliamentary inquiry, stronger language in the report is toned down after the CIA cautions its British counterpart and references to SISMI as the sourcing are dropped, even though they form the primary basis of the British report.  </p>
<p>	13  <b>Oct. 1, 2002.</b>Classified version completed </p>
<p>	14.    <b>October 4, 2002</b>, Tenet releases an unclassified paper <i>Iraqâ€™s Weapons of Mass Destruction programs</i> (White Paper)  Per the later Senate investigation report, the White Paper was missing many of the caveats in the key judgments and was also missing some of the references to alternative views .</p>
<p>	15.  <b>October 5, 2002</b>  memo from CIA to Bushâ€™s speechwriter, Michael Gerson and deputy National Security Adviser, Stephen Hadley, objecting to reference in proposed Cincinnati speech for Bush about Hussein trying to obtain yellowcake;<br />
	      <b>October 6, 2002</b> second CIA memo, this one to Rice and Hadley, more specifically referring to â€œweaknessâ€ in the evidence; and<br />
	      <b> Right before the speech</b> call from Tenet to Hadley requesting the reference come out â€“ it did not appear in the speech.  <a href="http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/1BlogArchive/2005_11_01_dsmemo_archive.html">http://www.downingstreetmemo.c&#8230;..chive.html</a></p>
<p>	16.  <b>October 7, 2002 </b> <i> President Bush said, â€œFacing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proofâ€”the smoking gunâ€”that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud.â€</i><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?031027fa_fact">http://www.newyorker.com/fact/&#8230;..027fa_fact</a></p>
<p>	17.  <b>October 13, 2002</b> Wilson writes an op piece for San Jose Mercury News, critical of the run up to war and                  <a href="http://www.politicsoftruth.com/editorials/saddam.html">http://www.politicsoftruth.com&#8230;..addam.html</a></p>
<p>	18.  <b>Oct. 16, 2002</b> Iraq force authorization (passed Oct 5??) is memorialized <a href="http://www.c-span.org/resources/pdf/hjres114.pdf">http://www.c-span.org/resources/pdf/hjres114.pdf</a></p>
<p>	19.  <b>January ___, 2003</b> National Intelligence Council issues memo that the Niger story is baseless and should be laid to rest. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/08/AR2006040800916.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/&#8230;..00916.html</a></p>
<p>	20.  <b>January 28, 2003</b> Presidentâ€™s SOTUS, with 16 words, â€œ”the British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.” That sentence came in the homestretch of saying that Iraq was ”assembling the world’s most dangerous weapons.” The sentence was part of building the case that ”the gravest danger facing America and the world is outlaw regimes that seek and possess nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons.”</p>
<p>	21.  <b>February 6, 2003</b> Colin Powell addresses UN with â€œproofâ€ <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/05/sprj.irq.powell.transcript/">http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/&#8230;..ranscript/</a> and doesnâ€™t mention the Niger issue. </p>
<p>	22.  <b>March 13, 2003 </b> al-Baradei and IAEA say Niger docs obvious fakes and some resulting uproar.  <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/14/sprj.irq.documents/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/&#8230;..index.html</a><br />
<i>But the discovery raises questions such as why the apparent forgeries were given to inspectors and why U.S. and British intelligence agents did not recognize that they were not authentic â€¦ A <b>U.S. intelligence official said that the documents were passed on </b>to the International Atomic Energy Agency <b>within days of being received</b> with the comment, ” ‘We don’t know the provenance of this information, but here it is.’ ” If a mistake was made, a U.S. official suggested, it was more likely due to incompetence not malice. “That’s a convenient explanation, but it doesn’t satisfy me,” [Ray] Close [a former CIA official] said. “Incompetence I have not seen in those agencies. I’ve seen plenty of malice, but I’ve never seen incompetence.” </i></p>
<p>	23.  <b>Sometime in March</b> Wilson claims there is a meeting of Cheney staff and/or others at which investigating Wilson was planned.   Cheney denies.   <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-04-29-cheney-cia-leak_x.htm">http://www.usatoday.com/news/w&#8230;..leak_x.htm</a></p>
<p>	24.  <b>June 3, 2003 and effective July 11, 2003</b> Tenet announces his resignation. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12296-2004Jun3.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/&#8230;..4Jun3.html</a></p>
<p>	25.  <b> June, 2003</b> British parliamentary inquiry debunks Blairâ€™s claim that, even though the Niger docs were forgeries, he and Bush had â€œother, secret evidenceâ€ they could not disclose.  This leaves the WH edgy and fingerpointy.  <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/08/AR2006040800916.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/&#8230;..00916.html</a></p>
<p>	26.  <b>Sometime in June, 2003</b> President decides to â€œdeclassifyâ€ â€œpartsâ€ of the NIE, (resurrecting the â€œparts is partsâ€ chicken nugget battles) (no, WaPo didnâ€™t mention the nuggets, but a scoops a scoop, and parts are parts).  He directs that Cheney â€œget it outâ€ <a href="http://wireservice.wired.com/wired/story.asp?section=Politics&amp;storyId=1508945">http://wireservice.wired.com/w&#8230;..Id=1508945</a> but with no other details.  OR the maybe the same, maybe alternative version, <a href="http://tinyurl.com/pnjqv">http://tinyurl.com/pnjqv</a> Bush did not authorize anyone to release the information to reporters. Apparently what he â€œdeclassifiedâ€ (in the parts sense), were the Key Judgments from the NIE, which had been, in a â€œtake out the qualificationsâ€ sense in Tenetâ€™s white paper, plus a couple of paragraphs that were not Key Judgments but alluded to the yellowcake and aluminum tubes claims made by the VP, P, NSAdv. <a href="http://www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/iraq-wmd.html,"></a><a href="http://www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/iraq-wmd.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/iraq-wmd.html</a>,  IMO, the typed up reports of what was released do not do justice to the pdf of what was released and how it looked.  <a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB129/nie_judgments.pdf">http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/N&#8230;..gments.pdf</a><br />
since that is what was ultimately released on July 18, 2003.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/08/AR2006040800916.html  IMO, the typed up reports of what was released do not do justice to the pdf of what was released and how it looked.  <a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB129/nie_judgments.pdf">http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/N&#8230;..gments.pdf</a>  At this point, no allegations or references that the President authorized the leaking of Plameâ€™s identity.</p>
<p>	27.  <b>Sometime at the end of June/beginning of July??</b> Cheney tells Libby to make revelations of portions of the NIE ; Libby balks, Cheney tells Libby that the President has authorized the release of the information, Libby speaks with Addington (but does not include him in the â€œthree people who knewâ€) and Addington tells him that the authorization from the President is tantamount to a declassification.  All from Libbyâ€™s GJ testimony, per the Special Prosecutorâ€™s Memorandum and does not mention any authorization by anyone to mention Plameâ€™s identity. </p>
<p>	28.  <b> June 23, 2003,</b> Judy Miller and Libby meet, an incident that slips their minds (perhaps as the story takes form that the OVP and WH interest in Wilson only came about after his July op ed?) and she took notes.  Subject???  [Possibly some references from this period of time to restrictions on Millerâ€™s writing for the NYT vis a vis WMD and Iraq â€“ but I have no cite/info so ???  Also not clear if Libby knows]</p>
<p>	29.  <b>June 26/27??, 2003</b> Libby and Woodward (working on book) meet and Libby mentions info apparently from the NIE.  <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/08/AR2006040800916.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/&#8230;..00916.html</a>  (Woodward also met with someone who mentioned Plame prior to the July 8 meeting between Libby and Miller, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10117465/site/newsweek/">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10&#8230;../newsweek/</a> and Woodward also finds Libbyâ€™s handwriting neat and organized and should probably be called upon to help transliterate, donâ€™t you think?)  From the Newsweek article, we learn that both Woodward and Novak are convinced the Plame leaks will end up being â€œnothing.â€ Woodward also admits knowing Novaks source when it comes out that he had the discussions/meetings he had at the WH)(and we also know that Novak is â€œabsolutely sureâ€ the President knows who did the Plame leaking). </p>
<p>	30. <b>Beginning sometime on or before the beginning of July, 2003</b> Hadley and others are lobbying the WH to declassify parts of the NIE and are not advised, at least not through 7-8-03, that the President has already done that or started the process. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/pnjqv">http://tinyurl.com/pnjqv</a> </p>
<p>	31.  <b> July 6, 2003</b> Wilsonâ€™s â€œWhat I Did Not Find In Africaâ€ piece. </p>
<p>	32.  <b>July 8, 2003</b> Libby meets with Miller, discusses NIE sections referring to a sheet he has brought with him [who prepared and what was on it and does Spec Prosec have it?] and specifies that he understood he was to tell her that the vigorous pursuit of yellowcake was one of the Key Judgments of the NIE (it was not and, by this point, had been pretty much disproven  in any event unless there was additional â€œsecretâ€ evidence, which there was not and had been shot down in the parliamentary inquiry report released in June).  Other than the parenthetical â€“ Libbyâ€™s GJ testimony as referred to in Spec. Prosec. Memorandum. </p>
<p>	33.  <b>July 8, 2003 </b>Air Force One trip  to So. Africa with Card, Fleischer, Powell, the Memo naming Plame, and Rice.<br />
	34. <b>Sometime in July, 2003</b> Tenet takes responsibility for the 16 words.  <a href="http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/usa/george-tenet/">http://www.rotten.com/library/&#8230;..rge-tenet/</a></p>
<p>	35. <b>July 13, 2003</b> Novak article outing Plameâ€™s covert CIA identity.</p>
<p>	36.  <b>July 18, 2003, </b> the Key Judgements, plus additional paragraphs, were released to reporters.  Full NIE has never been released.  </p>
<p>	37. <b> July 23, 2003</b>  Hadley takes blame for 16 words.  <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3088597.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3088597.stm</a></p>
<p>	38.  <b>September, 2003</b> meeting with Powell, where statement is made about â€œeveryone knowingâ€ (unclear context). </p>
<p>	39.  <b>Septeber 26, 2003,</b> CIA directs DOJ to initiate investigation. </p>
<p>	40.  <b> September 29, 2003, (8:30 PM)</b> Gonzales notified by DOJ (at request of CIA) an investigation has been opened, preserve all materials. Gonzales tells only Card at first, then 12 hours later staff.  </p>
<p>	41.  <b>October 3, 2003</b> Comey appointed <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/10/20031003-7.html">http://www.whitehouse.gov/news&#8230;..003-7.html</a></p>
<p>	42.  <b>December 23, 2003</b> Daschle sends letter to Ashcroft asking for a special prosecutor. </p>
<p>	43. <b>December 26, 2003</b> Post reports investigation gaining momentum</p>
<p>	45.  <b>December 30, 2003</b> Fitzgerald appointed.</p>
<p>	46. <b>January 2, 2004 </b> reports that FBI is having WH staffers sign releases for reporters of confidentiality they may have given their sources. </p>
<p>	47 <b>February 6, 2004</b> Fitzgerald receives letter clarifying scope. </p>
<p>	48.  <b>November 10, 2004</b> Bush announces Gonzales for AG.  </p>
<p>	49.  <b>April 20, 2005 </b> Comey announces resignation</p>
<p>	50.<b>October 28, 2005, </b> Libby Indicted</p>
<p>	51. <b>October, 2005</b> Fitzgeraldâ€™s appointment as US Atty in ND IL is/was up.  Renominated/reappointed????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Yum</title>
		<link>http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63351</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Yum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 03:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/10/nuevo-plumbers/#comment-63351</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Rove is the paradigm frat-boy college Republican: smirking, pasty fucks high-fiving each other over the latest political ambush; the entitlement crowd on Spring Break, date-raping.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Phone-jamming.  Old school bullshit, like McCain’s black baby and drug-addled wife.  Criminals are the ones who get caught.  Black, noisome “winning isn’t everything it’s the only thing” cancer on the Republic.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m so sick and tired of it.  It’s the worst traits of the “me generation” writ large; a grotesque, blasphemous cult of wish fullfilment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They must decrease, and we must increase.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rove is the paradigm frat-boy college Republican: smirking, pasty fucks high-fiving each other over the latest political ambush; the entitlement crowd on Spring Break, date-raping.</p>
<p>Phone-jamming.  Old school bullshit, like McCain’s black baby and drug-addled wife.  Criminals are the ones who get caught.  Black, noisome “winning isn’t everything it’s the only thing” cancer on the Republic.  </p>
<p>I’m so sick and tired of it.  It’s the worst traits of the “me generation” writ large; a grotesque, blasphemous cult of wish fullfilment.</p>
<p>They must decrease, and we must increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
