Comments on: What’s Your Definition of Leak? http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/ Firedoglake weblog Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:42:12 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: The Oracle http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-62171 The Oracle Mon, 10 Apr 2006 04:16:18 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-62171 <p>War is Hell.</p> <p>Bush is the War President. Therefore, Bush is the Hell President.</p> <p>Jesus Christ is called the Prince of Peace. Jesus, if president, would be called the Peace President.</p> <p>Bush is the War President, and is therefore not a Christian, or at least not a follower of the Prince of Prince.</p> <p>Bush is the War President. Bush is the Hell President.</p> <p>War is Hell.</p> War is Hell.

Bush is the War President. Therefore, Bush is the Hell President.

Jesus Christ is called the Prince of Peace. Jesus, if president, would be called the Peace President.

Bush is the War President, and is therefore not a Christian, or at least not a follower of the Prince of Prince.

Bush is the War President. Bush is the Hell President.

War is Hell.

]]> By: A day in the life of Silly Monkey » Long time no post! http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-62109 A day in the life of Silly Monkey » Long time no post! Mon, 10 Apr 2006 03:20:32 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-62109 <p>[…] Scooter fingers BUSH! (Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay!) Nice one on Firedoglake Linked through the KOS […]</p> […] Scooter fingers BUSH! (Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay!) Nice one on Firedoglake Linked through the KOS […]

]]> By: Bushtit http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-62039 Bushtit Mon, 10 Apr 2006 02:37:43 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-62039 <p>Impeach!</p> Impeach!

]]> By: Odograph.com » Blog Archive » George Bush http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-61881 Odograph.com » Blog Archive » George Bush Sun, 09 Apr 2006 23:38:11 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-61881 <p>[…] - more here […]</p> […] – more here […]

]]> By: Ken from Ken’s Kitchen http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-61714 Ken from Ken’s Kitchen Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:58:47 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-61714 <p>Wee-wee!</p> Wee-wee!

]]> By: Rubber Soul http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-61677 Rubber Soul Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:13:01 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-61677 <p>John Casper, although I didn’t sign my name, I wrote the ‘immaculte declassification’ line in the WaPo Blog this morning. Glad you liked it and feel free to pass it around. I think it is a good meme for how this administration operates. Besides you know bush is going to say that God told him it was the right thing to do!</p> John Casper, although I didn’t sign my name, I wrote the ‘immaculte declassification’ line in the WaPo Blog this morning. Glad you liked it and feel free to pass it around. I think it is a good meme for how this administration operates. Besides you know bush is going to say that God told him it was the right thing to do!

]]> By: mommybrain http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-61661 mommybrain Sun, 09 Apr 2006 19:49:55 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-61661 <p>Suzanne 74 - I haven’t been in a couple of years. last time I went the road had washed out. We tried to find it going overland but without the road we were, literally, lost. </p> <p> If you stand on the porch at the rangers’ station, facing the woods opposite, it’s up the road to the left. After many turns onto smaller and smaller roads, you park at a switchback and pick up the trail there. You’ll come to a grove at the bottom of a hill, maybe 1/2 mile from road. it’s there. Semper Virens office at the ranger station might be able to direct you? Last name is Burby. It’s a lovely hike even if you don’t find it. And thanks.</p> Suzanne 74 – I haven’t been in a couple of years. last time I went the road had washed out. We tried to find it going overland but without the road we were, literally, lost.

If you stand on the porch at the rangers’ station, facing the woods opposite, it’s up the road to the left. After many turns onto smaller and smaller roads, you park at a switchback and pick up the trail there. You’ll come to a grove at the bottom of a hill, maybe 1/2 mile from road. it’s there. Semper Virens office at the ranger station might be able to direct you? Last name is Burby. It’s a lovely hike even if you don’t find it. And thanks.

]]> By: mommybrain http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-61645 mommybrain Sun, 09 Apr 2006 19:28:52 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-61645 <p>#64 markfromirelandindenmark</p> <p>thanks for the gentle reminder. Wiping the tears away now.</p> #64 markfromirelandindenmark

thanks for the gentle reminder. Wiping the tears away now.

]]> By: Stacy B. http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-61639 Stacy B. Sun, 09 Apr 2006 19:23:15 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-61639 <p>Oh. My. God.</p> <p>This <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/08/AR2006040800895.html">WaPo editorial</a> is unbelievable. It has Bob Woodwards greasy fingerprints all over it.</p> <p>Most of the assertions in the editorial are a)false, b) rebutted on page 1 of the WaPo itself and c) nothing more than disgusting cheerleading for George Bush.</p> <p>Basically, it’s nothing more than a smear job of Joseph Wilson. But it ends proclaiming that George Bush basically did nothing wrong in declassifying his evidence for war- the WaPo selectively ignores the question of what Bush DIDNT choose to declassify because it rebutted his scase for war, but, hey- journalistic integrity isn’t exactly the WaPo’s concern these days is it?</p> Oh. My. God.

This WaPo editorial is unbelievable. It has Bob Woodwards greasy fingerprints all over it.

Most of the assertions in the editorial are a)false, b) rebutted on page 1 of the WaPo itself and c) nothing more than disgusting cheerleading for George Bush.

Basically, it’s nothing more than a smear job of Joseph Wilson. But it ends proclaiming that George Bush basically did nothing wrong in declassifying his evidence for war- the WaPo selectively ignores the question of what Bush DIDNT choose to declassify because it rebutted his scase for war, but, hey- journalistic integrity isn’t exactly the WaPo’s concern these days is it?

]]> By: Tim http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-61629 Tim Sun, 09 Apr 2006 19:06:06 +0000 http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/04/09/whats-your-definition-of-leak/#comment-61629 <p>” simplicity is the point of the spear . . .”</p> <p>Amen ck !</p> ” simplicity is the point of the spear . . .”

Amen ck !

]]>